CRIMINAL LAW. Problem Question Notes. PRINCIPLES... 1 Capacity Actus Reus Mens Rea... 4 Coincidence... 6!
|
|
- Mabel Arnold
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CRIMINAL LAW Problem Question Notes PRINCIPLES... 1 Capacity... 2 Actus Reus... 3 Mens Rea... 4 Coincidence... 6 OFFENCES... 7 Common Assault... 8 Actus Reus... 8 Mens Rea... 9 Consent to Harm Aggravated Assault Assaults Causing Particular Injuries Assaults Causing Disease Assaults with Further Specific Intent Assaults Using Offensive Weapons or Dangerous Substances Assaults on Victims with Special Status Domestic and Personal Violence Assaults Offences Relating to Public Order Sexual Assault Actus Reus Mens Rea Related Offences Reform Homicide I: Murder Actus Reus: Causation Mens Rea Constructive/Felony Murder Additional Notes Homicide II: Manslaughter Unlawful and Dangerous Act Manslaughter by Criminal Negligence Property Offences Actus Reus Mens Rea Coincidence Statutory Expansion of Larceny DEFENCES Self-Defence Genuine Belief Reasonable Response Excessive Self-Defence i
2 Necessity Nature of Emergency Accused s Belief Objective Standard Necessity and Abortion Duress Threat of Death or GBH Reasonable Apprehension Ordinary Person Test Limitations to the Defence Mental Illness Disease of the Mind Defect of Reason Nature and Quality of the Act Wrongness of the Act Special Verdict Disease of the Mind Tests Automatism Loss of Control External Cause No Prior Fault Provocation Provocative Circumstances Ordinary Person Test Subjective Loss of Control Substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind Abnormality of Mind Underlying Condition Substantial Impairment Intoxication Specific/Basic Distinction Relationship with Other Defences Intoxication and Murder Involuntary Intoxication Case Summaries 67 ii
3 [Principles]. Capacity + Actus Reus + Mens Rea Defences = Criminal Liability Criminal Liability 1. A person must have legal capacity to commit a criminal offence 2. That person must have committed the conduct elements of the offence, that is, the actus reus 3. The fault elements, or the mens rea, which form part of the offence, must have been present at the time of the actus reus; and 4. The absence of any defences of excuse or justification which would negate liability Burdens of Proof Legal Burden: o The prosecution must prove all the elements of a particular offence Beyond Reasonable Doubt the golden thread rule [Woolmington (1935)] o Exceptions are mental illness and substantial impairment of mind, burden rests with the defendant to prove on the balance of probabilities Evidentiary Burden: o Refers to one party s duty of producing sufficient evidence for a tribunal to call upon the other party to answer. o It is essentially involving the need to suggest a reasonable possibility 3
4 CAPACITY Presumption: people are sane, responsible for their own actions and know the difference between right and wrong. Three major exceptions: o Mental Illness: denies the D an ability to reason, and so the D is excused from criminal responsibility. The D exculpated because he did not know the nature and quality of the conduct, or that the conduct is wrong. Burden of proof on the defence to prove on the balance of probabilities that D is insane. Otherwise, if the D wants to raise other defence(s) there is an evidential burden on the D and P must rebut beyond reasonable doubt o Children: Inability to appreciate consequences of acts and lacking full appreciation of right and wrong. Children under 10 cannot commit a crime. The doctrine of doli incapax applies to children between the ages of ten and fourteen years. Doli incapax is a Latin term which means incapable of wrong. There is a rebuttable presumption: the prosecution needs to prove not only all the elements of an offence, but also that the child had the mental capacity to understand that what he of she was doing was wrong. o Involuntariness: where the act is not done in consciousness of the nature of the act and in exercise of a choice to do an act of that nature When the criminal act was accidental (provided there was no recklessness or criminal negligence this is really a lack of MR) When the criminal act was a reflex action [Ryan (1967); Murray (2002]. This is an act founded on an external cause rather than intention. As opposed to automatism, where a mental state is at issue, when volition is questioned, the barest levels of control are denied by the accused. o If the unwilled action occurs in the context of a dangerous situation that has been established by the defendant then voluntariness will be imputed by the voluntary creation of that situation e.g. pointing a loaded gun with the safety catch off When the conduct was performed whilst the accused was in a state of impaired consciousness [Jiminez (1992)] (see automatism) 4
5 ACTUS REUS Act Positive act, most common form of actus reus Sometimes offence definitions specify forbidden consequences (such as the death of a person, for homicide). For these offences, the prosecution must prove a link between the defendant s act and the prohibited consequences (causation) Omission Under common law tradition, a person could not be liable for failure to prevent harm, even where a person had the power to prevent that harm. In order for criminal liability for an omission to be established, a legal duty, and not just a moral duty, must be proven. Common Law Duties: General care and protection based on relationships: e.g. a duty owed by parents towards their young children [Russell (1933)] General care and protection which are voluntarily assumed towards a helpless person [Stone and Dobinson (1977); Taktak (1988)] Duties to carry out specific undertakings where failure to perform may be dangerous, with situations of employment featuring prominently o Employee s breach of duty to operate machinery of a mine resulted in a manslaughter conviction [Lowe (1850)] Duty to do something when you have created the danger or peril [Miller (1983)] Statutory Duties: Under statute, a provision may create liability for omissions e.g. criminalise the failure of polluters to notify the regulatory agency of pollution incidents) Status The prosecution does not have to prove any action on the part of the accused. Instead, criminal liability results from the fact that someone is found in a particular position [Larsonneur (1933)] For instance in NSW, status offences have included offences in the context of legislation responding to terrorism. It is an offence in NSW if a person is intentionally a member of an organisation which they know to be a terrorist organisation. 5
6 MENS REA General Intent: Irrelevant whether the intention was pre-meditated or formed a split-second before the act The D had a desire to do such a prohibited act or to bring about a result, of which he had knowledge of the probability of the occurrence of the consequences of that act [Stones (1456)] Intent, in one form, connotes a decision to bring about a situation so far as it is possible to do so, to bring about an act of a particular kind or a particular result. Such a decision implies a desire or wish to do such an act or to bring about such a result (Brennan J) [He Kaw Teh (1985)] Transferred Intent: o Where the accused has the intention to commit one criminal act but, due to the intervention of an additional factor such as lack of skill, commits the prohibited conduct against another unintended victim, then the intent (or malice) is transferred. o Does not operate where the actus reus and mens rea do not match e.g. throwing rock at person and smashing window [Pembleton (1874)] Ulterior intent: the intent must apply to its original act and the consequences. I.e. intention to wound and intention to cause grievous bodily harm. Basic intent: the prosecution has to prove that the accused acted voluntary, and that he or she intended to act. Recklessness: Recklessness occurs where D is aware of a risk that a prohibited outcome may occur and continues to act, regardless. The D has foresight of the possibility of the occurrence of consequences [Coleman (1990)] o For murder it is a foresight of probable consequences [Royall (1990)] Recklessness differs from intention, in that intention can be established where D wants a particular outcome or recognises that it is virtually certain. Recklessness differs from negligence, in that negligence is the failure to recognise an obvious risk, while recklessness is recognition of a risk but the decision to continue regardless. Wilful blindness is an evidentiary issue that may prove the defendant realised the possibility of prohibited outcome [Crabbe (1985)] it is not the offender s indifference to the consequences, but his knowledge that those consequences will probably occur [Crabbe (1985)] o Except sexual assault: not only where the accused adverts to the possibility of consent but ignores it, but also where the accused is so bent on gratification and indifferent to the rights of the victim as to ignore completely the requirements of consent. [Kitchener (1993)] Knowledge: May include knowledge of circumstances, e.g. lack of consent, age of victim or knowledge of consequences 6
7 Negligence: Negligent conduct is conduct that is far below the standard that reasonable persons would observe to avoid the commission of harm. Negligence in criminal law requires a high degree of negligence, sometimes denoted as criminal negligence or gross negligence. Fault component of negligent manslaughter is: an intent to do the act which, in fact, caused the death of the victim, but to do that act in circumstances where the doing of it involves a great falling short of the standard of care required of a reasonable man in the circumstances and a high degree of risk or likelihood of the occurrence of death or serious bodily harm if that standard of care was not observed, that is to say, such a falling short and such a risk as to warrant punishment under the criminal law [Nydam (1977)] Strict Mens rea is presumed unless the defendant can raise evidentiary burden that there was an honest and reasonable belief in an alternate set of facts that would take the behaviour beyond the realm of crime [He Kaw Teh (1985)] The availability of honest and reasonable mistake as an excuse distinguishes strict liability from absolute liability [Proudman v Dayman (1941)] The defence of honest and reasonable mistake of fact: o Reasonable grounds for belief o Honest/genuine belief Must have an affirmative belief in a mistaken set of facts rather than mere inadvertence to facts [State Rail Authority v Hunter District Water Board (1992)] Ignorance of the law does not afford any excuse for an act which would otherwise constitute an offence [Ostrowski v Palmer (2004)] o Alternative set o facts must take the actions of the accused beyond criminal liability Absolute Absolute liability offences require only the perpetration of the actus reus and exclude the defence of honest and reasonable mistake of fact. General defences such as necessity and duress are still available unless expressly excluded 7
8 COINCIDENCE For an offence to be committed, the prohibited act and the fault element must coincide. o Act and intent must coincide. If the circumstances of a fatal altercation are such that the prosecution can prove that some acts were done with the necessary intent but cannot prove that other acts were done with that intent, no conviction for murder can be returned unless there is evidence on which the jury can reasonably find that the act which caused the death was one of those done with the necessary intent. [Meyers (1997)] Continuing Mens Rea In some contexts, the coincidence of actus reus and mens rea may not be subject of narrow or strict interpretation. There may be coincidence even if the intention preceded the act, for example where the accused thought that they were disposing of a body or concealing commission of an offence. [Thabo Meli (1954)] If mens rea existed at the time they commenced a series of acts, and there was no intervening act breaking the casual chain then the mens rea applies to the series of acts. Where the unlawful application of force and the eventual act causing death are parts of the same sequence of events, the same transaction, the fact that there is an appreciable interval of time between the two does not serve to exonerate the defendant from liability. That is certainly so where the appellant s subsequent actions which caused death, after the initial unlawful blow, are designed to conceal his commission of the original unlawful assault [Le Brun (1992)] Underlying the decisions is an assessment that we do not fully reflect the accused s level of culpability by looking at a snapshot taken at a particular point in time, rather than a video which presents the sequence of events leading up to this point. o PROBLEM: we need to be aware of the risks of over criminalisation in other contexts from too ready a rejection of the need for coincidence between actus reas and mens rea. Continuing Actus Reus Mens rea does not have to be present at the commencement of the act, but can be superimposed on a continuing actus reus. It cannot however change an actus reus which is complete, and in which mens rea was absent [Fagan (1962)] o In that case the court held that whether the driving onto the foot was accidental or intentional, the accused still knowingly, unnecessarily, and provocatively allowed his car to remain there after the battery had been identified. o The crucial question was whether the actus reus could be considered spent after the car came to rest on the foot, or whether it was a continuing act operating until the wheel was removed. 8
9 [Offences]. 1. Common Assault 2. Aggravated Assault 3. Sexual Assault 4. Homicide Murder 5. Homicide Manslaughter 6. Property Offences Larceny Approach: - Define elements - Establish burden of proof - Identify issues of fact for the jury and issues of law for the judge 9
10 COMMON ASSAULT Definition: provided in common law. Only the penalty is prescribed in statute s 61 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW): Whoever assaults a person, although not occasioning actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years Burden/Standard of Proof: Beyond Reasonable doubt burden on the prosecution to prove elements (also must prove that there was no consent if raised by defence) Types of Assault: a) Intentional or reckless infliction of unlawful force (battery) [Fagan v Metropolitan Police Cmr (1969); Venna (1976)] b) An intentional or reckless act causing the victim to apprehend the immediate infliction of unlawful force (psychic) [Darby v DPP (2004); Collins v Wilcock (1984)] Actus Reus Battery Assault: (1) Direct Must be direct and aimed at the victim or on object on which the victim is supported [Salisbury (1976); Haystead (2000)] Can be a continuous act so that an unintentional battery can become a crime where the accused intentionally maintains the physical force to the person [Fagan v Metropolitan Police Cmr (1969)] Clothing is so intimately connected with the person that to touch clothes is regarded as touching the person [Day (1845); Thomas (1985)] Spitting on another person is a battery [DPP v JWH (unreported 1997)] (2) Unlawful Not a battery if contact occurs within the ordinary daily contingencies of life [Collins v Wilcock (1984)] There is no requirement for it to be violent or that actual harm is caused. Mere touching is sufficient [Collins v Wilcock (1984)] Psychic Assault: (1) Positive Act Can be committed without touching [Rolfe (1952)] Cannot be an omission [Fagan v Metropolitan Police Cmr (1969)] The use of words may be sufficient [Knight (1988)] (2) State of Mind of Victim Victim must actually have an apprehension of imminent unlawful contact [Barton v Armstrong (1969); Macpherson v Beath (1975)] Must be aware of the accused s act [Pemble (1971); Lamb v Cotogno (1987)] 10
11 Victim does not have to necessarily be fearful [Brady v Schatzel (1911); Ryan v Khul (1979)] o Whether the victim is uncommonly strong willed, and as such not fearful, should have nothing to do with establishing assault Can be when A puts B in fear of C [Macpherson v Beath (1975)] It is not necessary that the threat is real or possible [Everingham (1949)] Victim s apprehension must be reasonable applying the objective reasonable person test [Barton v Armstrong (1969)] o Unless the accused knew of unusual timidity [MacPherson v Beath (1975)] (3) Imminence Not sufficient that the threat raises likelihood that violence may be inflicted at some future time. While it was not found in this case, a threat over the phone is capable of instilling fear of immediate violence [Knight (1988); Ireland; Burstow (1997)] Can be an assault where fear is of relatively immediate violence of a continuing nature during an unlawful imprisonment [Zanker v Vartzokas (1988)] Can be an assault where the threat is made upon non-compliance with a condition which the accused had no right to impose [Police v Greaves (1964)] o Where cab driver was threatened he would be stabbed if he came any closer. Also relevant where threat is in excess of self-defence [Rosza v Samuels (1969)] o Courts will consider the words of the threat to interpret whether there is any imminence [Tuberville v Savage (1669)] if it were not assize time I would not take such language Mens Rea Intention Relates to use of force (or creation of apprehension) rather than the resulting bodily harm Hostility is not required, however, hostile intent could convert what would not otherwise be a battery into a battery [Boughey (1986)] Recklessness Foresees likelihood of inflicting injury or fear and ignores risk [Vallance (1961)] Accused must subjectively foresee the unlawful contact/apprehension; mere inadvertence to the risk is insufficient [Macpherson v Beath (1975)] Standard for recklessness is possibility rather than probability o Where the crime is murder, the standard is probability [Coleman (1990)] In a fight between men reckless can be given its normal meaning in not caring whether harm occurred or not [Williams (1990)] 11
12 Consent to Harm As soon as the defence raises consent to harm, it must be proven beyond reasonably doubt that the victim did not, expressly or impliedly, consent to the assault [Clarence (1888)] An assault with consent is no assault at all [Bonora (1994)] Consent procured by fraud is not consent [Wooley v Fitzgerald (1969)] o Under criminal law, only fraud as to the nature of the act or the physical identity of the person could vitiate consent [Richerdson (1998)] Those who enter into a consensual fight are guilty of assault if they intend to inflict bodily harm [Coney (1882)] Prevailing test for whether consent is valid is social benefit [Brown (1994)] Exceptions: o Sport: A person does not consent to being injured in the course of a game by any act which is not done in legitimate pursuit of the objects of the game [Carr (unreported 1990); Stanley (1995)] Consent is valid in a professional boxing match [Pallante v Stadiums Pty Ltd (No 1) (1976)] o Medical examinations and operation are only valid where consent is expressly given or where emergency conditions make the procurement of consent impractical [Marion s Case (1991)] o Parents are entitled to use reasonable and moderate force to chastise their children ss 61AA Crimes Act 1900: Parents, or persons acting on behalf of parents, are able to use reasonable and moderate force (trivial and negligible force) to chastise their children. However, the level of force is confined to exclude force applies to the head or neck, or to any part of the body if the harm lasts more than a short period. 12
CRIMINAL LAW FINAL EXAM SUMMARY
CRIMINAL LAW FINAL EXAM SUMMARY Contents WEEK ONE CONTENT... Error! Bookmark not Woolmington v DPP [1935]... 7 Green v The Queen (1971)... 7 Youseff (1990)... 7 Zecevic v DPP (1987)... 7 WEEK 2 CONTENT...
More informationLAW1114: CRIMINAL LAW EXAM NOTES
LAW1114: CRIMINAL LAW EXAM NOTES CONTENTS TOPIC COMMON OTHER 1 S OF A CRIME 2 NON- FATAL, NON- SEXUAL AGAINST THE PERSON 3 SEXUAL 4 HOMICIDE 5 DEFENCES AR (p3) - Positive, voluntary act (PVA) - Causation
More information(1) Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for five years.
SAMPLE Aggravated Assault s 59 Assault Occasioning ABH 59 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (1) Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment
More informationJURD7122/LAWS1022 Criminal Laws
JURD7122/LAWS1022 Criminal Laws MURDER... 5 ELEMENTS... 5 ACTUS REUS... 5 Voluntariness... 5 Ommission... 5 Causation... 5 MENS REA... 5 Heads of mens rea:... 5 Intention to kill... 5 Intention to inflict
More informationIntroduction Crime, Law and Morality. Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax.
Introduction Crime, Law and Morality Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax. Objective Principles: * Constructive-murder rule: a person may be guilty of murder, if while in
More informationCriminal Law Exam Notes
Criminal Law Exam Notes Contents LARCENY... Error! Bookmark not defined. Actus Reus... Error! Bookmark not defined. Taking & Carrying Away... Error! Bookmark not defined. Property Capable of Being Stolen...
More informationFAULT ELEMENTS, STRICT LIABILITY AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY. Generally involves an actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind).
FAULT ELEMENTS, STRICT LIABILITY AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY CRIME A wrong punishable by the State. Generally involves an actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind). Description of a prohibited behaviour
More informationCRIM EXAM NOTES. Table of Contents. Weeks 1-4
CRIM EXAM NOTES Weeks 1-4 Table of Contents Setup (jurisdiction, BOP, onus)... 2 Elements, AR, Voluntariness... 3 Voluntariness, Automatism... 4 MR (intention, reckless, knowledge, negligence)... 5 Concurrence...
More informationCriminal Law A Flowchart
Part 1: Has A Crime Been Committed Actus Reas (Physical Element of Crime): Criminal Law A Flowchart 1. Automatism and Voluntariness a. Was the act done by a sane mind and was voluntary? i. Accidents count
More informationContents PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY Chapter 1: Fundamental Principles of Criminal Liability 1: Actus Reus 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Conduct as
More informationCriminal Law. Text, Cases, and Materials. Janet Loveless. Third Edition UNIVERSITY PRESS
Criminal Law Text, Cases, and Materials Third Edition Janet Loveless UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Guide to using the book Guide to the Online Resource Centre this edition Preface Acknowledgements Table cases
More informationCourse breakdown 1) Theory 2) Offences 3) Extended liability 4) Defences 5) Procedure
Course breakdown 1) Theory a. Principles, classic model & criminal method b. Element analysis 2) Offences a. Dishonesty b. Unlawful killing c. Non-fatal offences against the person d. Sexual offences 3)
More informationMLL214&'CRIMINAL'NOTES' ''''''! Topic 1: Introduction and Overview
! Topic 1: Introduction and Overview Introduction Criminal law has both a substantive and procedural component. o Substantive: defining and understanding the constituent elements of the various common
More information10: Dishonest Acquisition
WEEK (week beginning Monday) 1 (28 July) 1 2 (4 August) 3 CLASS CHAPTER TOPIC PAGE NOS. 2 5: Homicide 4 3 (11 August) 5 4 (18 August) 7 6 6: Defences 8 Introduction, (some classes may view a video and/or
More informationHSC Legal Studies. Year 2017 Mark Pages 46 Published Feb 6, Legal Studies: Crime. By Rose (99.4 ATAR)
HSC Legal Studies Year 2017 Mark 97.00 Pages 46 Published Feb 6, 2017 Legal Studies: Crime By Rose (99.4 ATAR) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Your notes author, Rose. Rose achieved an ATAR of 99.4 in
More informationPART 1: THE FUNDAMENTALS...
Contents PART 1: THE FUNDAMENTALS... 6 The Fundamentals of Criminal Law (CHAPTER 1)... 6 Sources of criminal law:... 6 Criminal capacity:... 7 Children:... 7 Corporations:... 7 Classifications of crimes:...
More informationMLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES
MLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES Contents Topic 1: Course Overview... 3 Sources of Criminal Law... 4 Requirements for Criminal Liability... 4 Topic 2: Homicide and Actus Reus... Error! Bookmark not defined. Unlawful
More informationMLL214: CRIMINAL LAW
MLL214: CRIMINAL LAW 1 Examinable Offences: 2 Part 1: The Fundamentals of Criminal Law The definition and justification of the criminal law The definition of crime Professor Glanville Williams defines
More informationTopic 5 Non-fatal,Non-sexual offences against the person
Topic 5 Non-fatal,Non-sexual offences against the person Examine how the criminal law deals with some common harms against the person and cover the elements of several non-fatal, non-sexual offences against
More informationHomicide: Intent and Reckless Indifference [Week 1B]! Wednesday, 30 July 2014! 3:12 pm! Criminal Laws (Brown et al) [ ]!! Homicide: Murder and
Homicide: Intent and Reckless Indifference [Week 1B] Wednesday, 30 July 2014 3:12 pm Criminal Laws (Brown et al) [425-448] Homicide: Murder and Involuntary Manslaughter Patterns of Homicide: A Wallace,
More informationCRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD
CRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW 7 DEFINITION OF CRIMINAL LAW 7 Deterrence 7 Rehabilitation 7 Public Protection 7 Retribution 8 CRIMINAL LAW AND
More informationQuestion With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss. 2. What defense or defenses might Dan assert? Discuss.
Question 2 As Dan walked down a busy city street one afternoon, Vic, a scruffy, long-haired young man, approached him. For some time, Dan had been plagued by a pathological fear that long-haired transients
More informationTo begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be:
Homicide Offences To begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be: Murder or voluntary manslaughter if partial defences
More informationLLB130 NOTES !!!!!!!!
! LLB130 NOTES!!!!!!!! Contents Defining Crime 4 Components of Criminal Offences I 9 General Principles 9 Actus Reus and Mens Rea 10 Actus Reus 11 Mens Rea 14 Criminal Responsibility and the Burden of
More informationCriminal Law Outline intent crime
This outline was created for the July 2006 Oregon bar exam. The law changes over time, so use with caution. If you would like an editable version of this outline, go to www.barexammind.com/outlines. Criminal
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Define what is meant by a crime
Tech Level Unit Title: LAW OF CRIME Level: Level 3 Credit Value: 10 Guided Learning Hours 60 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1. Understand the principles of criminal liability Assessment criteria The
More informationHart s View Criminal law should only act on bare minimum and it should not extend into the private realm
NATURE OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY What is Crime? Two thought pools: Criminal law not linked to central morals of society Views of positivists Criminal law is linked to morals or views
More informationLAWS1021 Crime and the Criminal Process Intent and Reckless Indifference... Constructive Murder... Unlawful act causing manslaughter (reckless
LAWS1021 Crime and the Criminal Process Intent and Reckless Indifference... Constructive Murder... Unlawful act causing manslaughter (reckless indifference to human life) - involves reasonable man test...
More informationCriminal Law Doctrine and Theory
Criminal Law Doctrine and Theory Third edition William Wilson Hartow, England - London New York Boston San f rancisco Toronto Sydney Tokyo Singapore Mong Kong Seoul Taipei New Delhi Cape Town Madrid Mexico
More informationI. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.
I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i. A specific intent crime is one in which an actual intent on the part of the
More informationMLL214 CRIMINAL LAW 2013 MICHAEL KRIEWALDT
MLL214 CRIMINAL LAW 2013 MICHAEL KRIEWALDT THE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAW 1 1. Introduction In this unit we are looking at the basic principles and underlying rationales of the substantive criminal law.
More informationCriminal Law II Overview Jan June 2006
Inchoate Liability Incitement Incitement is the common law offence (see Whitehouse [1977]) of influencing the mind of another whilst intending him to commit a crime. Its actus reus is the actual communication
More informationLAWS1206 Criminal Law and Procedure 1 st Semester 2005
LAWS1206 Criminal Law and Procedure 1 st Semester 2005 How to Use this Script: These sample exam answers are based on problems done in past years. Since these answers were written, the law has changed
More informationIntroduction to Criminal Law
Introduction to Criminal Law CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Crimes versus Civil Wrongs 2 Types of Criminal Offences 3 General Principles of Criminal Law 4 Accessories and Parties to Crimes 5 Attempted
More informationCHAPTER 1: FOUNDATIONS
Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: FOUNDATIONS 5 THREE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CRIMINALISATION: 5 ELEMENTS OF GUILT 5 CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF CHILDREN 6 CORPORATIONS 6 THE AIMS OF PUNISHMENT 6 DOUBLE JEOPARDY
More informationCRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #2 MODEL ANSWER. 1. With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss.
CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #2 MODEL ANSWER As Dan walked down a busy city street one afternoon, Vic, a scruffy, long-haired young man, approached him. For some time, Dan had been plagued
More informationCRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY 2011
SUMMARY 2011 LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES DISCRETION TO ARREST Internal police guidelines LEGALITY OF ARREST POLICE INTERVIEW IN CUSTODY PHYSICAL ELEMENTS Conduct Conduct which occurs
More information1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention
1) 11 CHOOSE THE BEST CHOICE AND MARK IT ON YOUR ANSWER SHEET. Part A: Fill in the Blanks 1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention. A person is where
More informationLEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2012
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2012 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 - CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2011
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 - CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2011 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationOffences 3. S300 Unlawful homicide 3. S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4. S303 Manslaughter 7. S335 Common Assault 9
4032LAW Exam Notes Offences 3 S300 Unlawful homicide 3 S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4 S303 Manslaughter 7 S335 Common Assault 9 S339 Assault occasioning bodily harm 10 S340 Serious assaults 11 S317 Acts
More informationSOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 4&5: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada II:
SOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 4&5: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada II: In the next 2 classes we will consider: (i) Canadian constitutional mechanics; (ii) Types of law; (iii)
More informationHSC Legal Studies. Year 2016 Mark Pages 33 Published Feb 7, Legal- Crime Notes. By Annabelle (97.35 ATAR)
HSC Legal Studies Year 2016 Mark 94.00 Pages 33 Published Feb 7, 2017 Legal- Crime Notes By Annabelle (97.35 ATAR) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Your notes author, Annabelle. Annabelle achieved an ATAR
More informationCRIMINAL LAW. Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series. 4th edition
CRIMINAL LAW Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series 4th edition Alan Reed, M.A., LL.M., Solicitor Professor of Criminal and Private International Law, University of Sunderland and Ben Fitzpatrick, B.A., P.G.C.L.T.H.E.
More informationCRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE: SEMINARS & FINAL EXAM NOTES
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE: SEMINARS & FINAL EXAM NOTES TABLE OF CONTENTS 3A: General Principles Proof, Capacity, and Elements of Criminal Offences 2 Introduction 2 Elements of Criminal Liability 4 3B: External
More information692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses
692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses THE LAW New York Penal Code (1999) Part 3. Specific Offenses Title H. Offenses Against the Person Involving Physical Injury, Sexual Conduct, Restraint and Intimidation Article
More informationSAMPLE Criminal Law HD Exam Scaffold
SEXUAL ASAULT -s 61I Crimes Act 'Basic' sexual assault: Actus reus: the Crown must prove BRD both of the following limbs: 1. The accused must have had sexual intercourse with the victim. Sexual penetration
More informationMLL214 Criminal Law Exam Notes and Cases
MLL214 Criminal Law Exam Notes and Cases 1 Topic 1 Introduction to Criminal Law Contents Page Page 6: Fundamentals of Criminal Law Page 7: Strict Liability Page 8: Absolute Liability Page 9: Case: He Kew
More informationCRIMINAL LAW TJ MCINTYRE SEAN Ô TOGHDA
CRIMINAL LAW TJ MCINTYRE SEAN Ô TOGHDA ROUND HALL THOMSON REUTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Preface Table of Cases Table of vii ix xix xxxi CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 1 Defining the Criminal Law 1 Background
More informationStrict liability and honest and reasonable mistake of fact defence
Strict liability and honest and reasonable mistake of fact defence Case Proudman v Dayman SRA v Hunter District Water Board Proudman v Dayman CTM Note Dixon J held that liability is strict in relation
More information1.2 Explain the nature of an actus reus. 1.4 Identify principal types of mens rea. 1.5 Explain the meaning and significance of transferred malice.
Unit 3 Title: Criminal Law Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the fundamental principles of criminal liability Assessment criteria The learner can: 1.1 Define actus
More informationIntroduction to Criminal Law
Winter 2019 Introduction to Criminal Law Recognizing Offenses Shoplifting equals Larceny Criminal possession of stolen property. Punching someone might be Assault; or Harassment; or Menacing Recognizing
More information~~~~~ Week 6. Element of a Crime
~~~~~ Week 6 Element of a Crime PHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF A CRIME (AR) Physical elements may refer to: o A specified form of conduct such as: An act; An omission; or There is a CL duty not to cause harm to
More informationCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition Chapter 3 Criminal Law The Nature and Purpose of Law (1 of 2) Law A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, that proscribes
More informationADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW. Name: Period: Row:
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW Name: Period: Row: I. INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW A. Understanding the complexities of criminal law 1. The justice system in the United States
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface... Major Works Referred to... INTRODUCTION: THE NEED TO ADOPT BROADER PERSPECTIVES... 1
Preface... Major Works Referred to... v ix Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION: THE NEED TO ADOPT BROADER PERSPECTIVES... 1 A. Canada s Criminal Code... 2 B. Rocky Road to General Part... 4 C. Sources of Criminal Law...
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationSection 17 Lesser Evils Defense 535. Chapter Ten. Offenses Against the Person. Article One. Causing Death
Section 17 Lesser Evils Defense 535 THE LAW Israeli Penal Law (1995) (5737-1977, as amended in 5754-1994) Section 298. Manslaughter Chapter Ten. Offenses Against the Person Article One. Causing Death If
More informationLEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2012
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2012 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationCRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS
CRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS Fifth Edition by C. M. V. CLARKSON, B.A.,LL.B.,LL.M. Trofessor oflaw, University ofleicester H. M. KEATING, LL.M. Senior Lecturer in Law, University ofsussex LONDON SWEET
More informationComparative Criminal Law 6. Defences
Comparative Criminal Law 6 Defences 11.03.2013 Content Defenses. Infringement. Guilt. Corporate responsibility. Two, three or more elements? Actus reus and mens rea (-defenses) Actus reus, infringement
More informationCRM 321 Mod 5 Lecture Notes
CRM 321 Mod 5 Lecture Notes In this module we will examine the worst of the crimes that can be committed - crimes against persons. Persons crimes are distinguished from so-called victimless crimes, crimes
More informationDiscuss the George Zimmerman case. What defense he is expected to claim, and why may he qualify under the facts and circumstances?
CHAPTER 5 JUSTIFICATIONS AS DEFENSES CHAPTER OUTLINE I. Introduction II. Types of Defenses III. The Nature of Defenses IV. Justification as a Defense A. Necessity B. Self Defense C. Defense of Others D.
More informationFlorida Jury Instructions. 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE (1)(a), Fla. Stat.
Florida Jury Instructions 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE 782.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat. When there will be instructions on both premeditated and felony, the following explanatory paragraph should be read to the jury.
More informationDefenses for the Accused. Chapter 10
Defenses for the Accused Chapter 10 Denial A defense is the denial of committing the act or giving justification of what otherwise would be considered a criminal act. The most common defense for an accused
More informationVoluntary act by the accused causes the death of a human being
Topic 5 Sporting Violence - Sportspeople may be held criminally liable for death/injury caused on the sporting field. - The perpetrator will argue that the conduct should be dealt with via the competitions
More informationThe Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1
CONTENTS Preface xiii Acknowledgments About the Author xv xvii I. CHAPTER 1 The Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1 A. Introduction 1 1. The Purpose of Criminal Law 1 a) Morality and Blame 2 b) The
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAW (CHAPTER 1 PAGE 3) WEEK 1 INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW & OFFENCES OF STRICT & ABSOLUTE LIABILITY
1 MLL214 Notes Criminal Law THE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAW (CHAPTER 1 PAGE 3) WEEK 1 INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW & OFFENCES OF STRICT & ABSOLUTE LIABILITY Criminal law is made up of both a substantive and
More informationESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY
I. PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW a. Actus reus b. Mens rea c. Concurrence d. Causation II. III. ESSAY APPROACH www.barexamdoctor.com CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY a. Elements of accomplice liability
More informationCRIMINAL LAW CHART OF BLACK LETTER LAW DEFINITIONS & ELEMENTS
I. BASIC DEFINITION - Act + Mental State + Result = Crime Defenses II. ACTUS REUS - a voluntary act, omissions do not usually count. A. VOLUNTARY ACT Requires a voluntary and a social harm An act is voluntary
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2018
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2018 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide candidates and tutors with guidance as to the key points candidates
More informationUnderlying principles of Criminal Liability
Actus Reus 2 of 9 THE GUILTY ACT! Involuntary Acts - does not form actus reus - Hill v Baxter (1958); swarm of bees Omissions - a failure to act is not an act. Where a person's contract requires him to
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More information[page Snyman] 1. Legality 2. Conduct 3. Causation 4. Unlawfulness 5. Criminal accountability/ capacity 6. Fault
MODULE 3: CONDUCT [page 51-63 Snyman] 1. Legality 2. Conduct 3. Causation 4. Unlawfulness 5. Criminal accountability/ capacity 6. Fault For a person to be found guilty of a crime, the State must prove
More informationSection 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree
Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631 THE LAW Wyoming Statutes (1982) Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section 6-4-101. Murder in the First Degree (a) Whoever purposely
More informationUNLAWFUL AND DANGEROUS ACT MANSLAUGHTER:
Unlawful and Dangerous Act Manslaughter 228 UNLAWFUL AND DANGEROUS ACT MANSLAUGHTER: R. v. WILLS1 The defendant ("D") was out shopping with his de facto wife when he saw in the street his legal wife from
More informationCHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law
CHAPTER 14 Criminal Law and Juvenile Law CRIMINAL LAW Chapter 14 Section I Case File and 345-347 Review the case file at the beginning of the chapter. Think about the situation (however exaggerated it
More informationA CASEBOOK ON SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW
A CASEBOOK ON SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW Fourth Edition Christopher H.W. Gane, LL.B., Professor of Scots Law, University of Aberdeen Charles N. Stoddart, LL.B., LL.M. (McGill), Ph.D., Formerly Sheriff of Lothian
More informationLegal Liability. Sophie Foyston ROB
Legal Liability Sophie Foyston ROB14236233 Contents Task 1... 3 Part 1 (P1 and P2)... 3 Neighbour Principle... 3 Duty of Care... 3 Breach of Duty... 3 Damage... 4 Compensation... 4 Part 2 (M1)... 5 Part
More informationThe defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1
Page 1 of 11 206.30 SECOND DEGREE MURDER WHERE A DEADLY WEAPON IS USED, COVERING ALL LESSER INCLUDED HOMICIDE OFFENSES AND SELF- DEFENSE. FELONY. NOTE WELL: If self-defense is at issue and the assault
More informationSlide 1. Slide 2 Basic denial defence which is used when the accused claims that he or she was not present at the time of the offence.
Slide 1 (including Excuses and Justifications) Slide 2 Basic denial defence which is used when the accused claims that he or she was not present at the time of the offence. Independent evidence supporting
More informationThe defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1. Under the law and the evidence in this case, it is your duty to return
PAGE 1 OF 14 NOTE WELL: If self-defense is at issue and the assault occurred in defendant s home, place of residence, workplace or motor vehicle, see N.C.P.I. Crim. 308.80, Defense of Habitation. The defendant
More informationFALL 2011 December 12, 2011 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE
CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2011 December 12, 2011 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. (A) is incorrect, because a solicitation does not require agreement on the part of the object of the
More informationCriminal Law Guidebook - Chapter 10: Extending Criminal Responsibility
The following is a suggested solution to the problem question on page 246. It represents an answer of an above average standard. The ILAC approach to problem-solving as set out in the How to Answer Questions
More information1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person
1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person I. ASSAULT AND BATTERY A. In General. 1. Nature of Offenses. (a) [ 1] In General. (b) [ 2] Relationship Between Offenses. (c) [ 3] Classification
More informationCRIME, LAW AND MORALITY
LAWS5004 Criminal Law Class 1 CRIME, LAW AND MORALITY (i) Sources of criminal law NSW a CL state; no Criminal Code But most of state s criminal law in the NSW Crimes Act 1900 (e.g. murder, sexual assault)
More informationTORT LAW NOTES. The case below demonstrates that fault is an essential element of liability in trespass to person.
TORT LAW NOTES TRESPASS TO PERSON Traditionally, there were two types of actions that were concerned with the plaintiff s person. They were trespass and action on the case. The distinction between these
More informationCED: An Overview of the Law
Torts BY: Edwin Durbin, B.Comm., LL.B., LL.M. of the Ontario Bar Part II Principles of Liability Click HERE to access the CED and the Canadian Abridgment titles for this excerpt on Westlaw Canada II.1.(a):
More informationLoveless, Allen, and Derry: Complete Criminal Law 6e, Chapter 02
Think box 2.1 D attends a show by a famous hypnotist in the course of which he is conditioned to embrace anyone wearing a uniform. After the show, a police officer (V) approaches D to tell him he is illegally
More information1 Criminal Responsibility
1 Criminal Responsibility 1.1 Who can commit crimes? A person who is: Over the age of 18 A rational being Capable of understanding the difference between right and wrong Able to control conscious actions
More information21. Creating criminal offences
21. Creating criminal offences Criminal offences are the most serious form of sanction that can be imposed under law. They are one of a variety of alternative mechanisms for achieving compliance with legislation
More informationColonel (Retired) Timothy Grammel, United States Army. Issue 1: Is the current definition of consent unclear or ambiguous?
Colonel (Retired) Timothy Grammel, United States Army [Below are comments on the 11 issues currently before the Judicial Proceedings Panel Subcommittee. I had prepared these comments before the Subcommittee
More informationChoose the best choice and mark it on your answer sheet. Part A: Fill in the Blanks
: : : : ( ) : : : : : / Choose the best choice and mark it on your answer sheet. Part A: Fill in the Blanks 1-The physical element of a crime is the 1. mens rea 2. actus reus 3. offence 4. intention 2-A
More informationCRIMINAL LITIGATION PRE-COURSE MATERIALS
Legal Practice Course 2014-2015 CRIMINAL LITIGATION PRE-COURSE MATERIALS Copyright Bristol Institute of Legal Practice, UWE AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LITIGATION 1. Introduction: You will be studying
More informationGOULD S BAR EXAM FLASH CARDS FOR CRIMINAL LAW
Gould's Bar Examination Flash Card Series GOULD S BAR EXAM FLASH CARDS FOR GOULD S LEGAL EDUCATION Providing Quality Learning Solutions to All Law Students WEBSITE http://www.gouldslegaleducation.com OFFICE
More informationLAWS1206 Criminal Law 1 st Semester 2011
LAWS1206 Criminal Law 1 st Semester 2011 How to Use this Script: These sample exam answers are based on problems done in past years. Since these answers were written, the law has changed and the subject
More informationLAWS106 CRIMINAL LAW Semester
Week One: The Criminal Law Chapter One of Text What is a crime? LAWS106 CRIMINAL LAW Semester 1 2014 Professor Glanville Williams defines a crime as: 'A crime (or offence) is a legal wrong that can be
More informationFACULTY OF LAW LAWS5004 CRIMINAL LAW (OFFENCES & DEFENCES) EXTENDED SUMMARIES
Raffael Maestri! 1 FACULTY OF LAW LAWS5004 CRIMINAL LAW (OFFENCES & DEFENCES) EXTENDED SUMMARIES OFFENCES DEFENCES Assault (non-sexual) Provocation Sexual Assault Self-Defence Homicide I: Murder Duress
More informationCRIMINAL LAW MURDER & MANSLAUGHTER
CRIMINAL LAW MURDER & MANSLAUGHTER This is basically a common-law offence and to constitute it there must be an unlawful killing of another human being under the Queen s peace with malice aforethought.
More information