CHAPTER 1: FOUNDATIONS
|
|
- Anthony Cameron
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: FOUNDATIONS 5 THREE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CRIMINALISATION: 5 ELEMENTS OF GUILT 5 CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF CHILDREN 6 CORPORATIONS 6 THE AIMS OF PUNISHMENT 6 DOUBLE JEOPARDY 7 ABUSE OF PROCESS 7 PERJURY 7 BURDENS OF PROOF 8 INSANITY AS A DEFENCE 8 APPEALS IN AUSTRALIA 9 CHAPTER 2: ASSAULT AND RELATED OFFENCES 10 CONTACT: NO INJURY 10 CONTACT: SOME INJURY 10 CONTACT: SERIOUS INJURY 10 COMMON ASSAULT 11 THREAT 11 BATTERY 12 ASSAULT CASES 13 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT: ACCOMPANIED BY PARTICULAR INTENTION 16 ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO KILL (ATTEMPTED MURDER) CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) SS POISONING CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) SS 39, 41, 41A 17 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT: COMMITTED ON PARTICULAR CLASS OF PERSONS 18 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT: RESULTING IN PARTICULAR KIND OF HARM 19 ASSAULT OCCASIONING ACTUAL BODILY HARM CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) S WOUNDING OR INFLICTING GBH CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) SS 33, 35, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: PARTNERS AND CHILDREN 20 STALKING 20 SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS 21 CONSENT 21 AFFRAY 22 FALSE IMPRISONMENT: KIDNAPPING 23 CHAPTER 4: MURDER 25 ACT AND CAUSATION 25 INTERVENING ACTS: BREAKING CAUSATION 26 MALICE 27 MALICE AFORETHOUGHT 27 CONSTRUCTIVE MALICE 27 CONTEMPORANEITY 28 LAWFUL HOMICIDE 28 CHAPTER 5: VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER 29 VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER 29 PARTIAL DEFENCES 29 INFANTICIDE 29 SUBSTANTIAL IMPAIRMENT BY ABNORMALITY OF MIND 30 EXCESSIVE SELF-DEFENCE 31 1
2 PROVOCATION - PARKER V R [1963] 31 CHAPTER 6: INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER 35 UNLAWFUL AND DANGEROUS ACT MANSLAUGHTER 35 NEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER 36 CULPABLE DRIVING CAUSING DEATH 37 INDUSTRIAL MANSLAUGHTER 38 LECTURE: WEEK 2 [MURDER] 39 HOMICIDE 39 OMISSION 39 MURDER OR MANSLAUGHTER TEST 40 CAUSATION AND NOVUS ACTUS INTERVENIENS 40 TAKE YOUR VICTIM AS YOU SEE THEM 40 OPERATING CAUSE OF DEATH 41 PROSECUTING DOCTORS 41 TRANSFERRED MALICE 42 RECKLESS INDIFFERENCE TO HUMAN LIFE 42 CHAPTER 12: COMPLETE DEFENCES 43 SELF-DEFENCE: CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) SS REQUIREMENTS FOR SELF-DEFENCE: 43 NECESSITY: CRIMINAL CODE ACT 1995 (CTH) S THE CONDITIONS NEEDED TO SATISFY NECESSITY 49 DURESS 50 THE CONDITIONS NEEDED TO SATISFY DURESS 51 BATTERED WOMAN SYNDROME 51 NECESSITY AND DURESS: CRITICAL COMMENT 52 THE POSITION OF MARRIED WOMEN: EWART V FOX [1954] 52 INTOXICATION - DETERMINING WHETHER INTENT WAS PRESENT 53 CHAPTER 14: MENTAL IMPAIRMENT AND RELATED DEFENCES 54 M NAGHTEN S CASE (1843) 54 QUESTION OF LAW RESERVED (NO 1 OF 1997) - FULL COURT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SA 56 SCOPE OF MENTAL IMPAIRMENT DEFENCE 56 COMMONWEALTH CRIMINAL CODE ACT MENTAL HEALTH (FORENSIC PROVISIONS) ACT 1990 (NSW) - NGMI 58 MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2007 (NSW) 58 BURDEN OF PROOF 58 MENTAL HEALTH (CRIMINAL PROCEDURE) ACT UNFITNESS TO STAND TRIAL - MENTAL HEALTH (FORENSIC PROVISIONS) ACT 1990 (NSW) PT PREVENTATIVE DETENTION 59 CHAPTER 3: SEXUAL OFFENCES 60 CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) 60 ACTUS REUS FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT 66 MENS REA FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT 66 RECKLESSNESS REQUIREMENTS 66 SEXUAL ASSAULT FLOW CHART 67 ACTUS REUS 67 MENS REA 67 INDECENT ASSAULT REQUIREMENTS 61L 67 2
3 RAPE BY DECEPTION CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) S 61HA(5) 68 SODOMY, BESTIALITY, INCEST, PROSTITUTION 68 STALKING & INTIMIDATION 69 REQUIREMENTS FOR STALKING 69 REQUIREMENTS FOR INTIMIDATION 69 CHAPTER 7: PROPERTY OFFENCES (NSW) 72 LARCENY 72 ELEMENTS OF LARCENY ILICH V R 72 STATUTORY PROVISIONS REGARDING LARCENY CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) 72 ACTUS REUS LARCENY 73 MENS REA LARCENY 77 FRAUD CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW) S 192E ALTERNATIVE VERDICT TO LARCENY 79 ELEMENTS OF FRAUD 81 ACTUS REUS FRAUD 82 MENS REA FRAUD 83 ROBBERY, BURGLARY, BLACKMAIL, RECEIVING 84 BLACKMAIL 84 BURGLARY / HOUSEBREAKING GOVERNED BY SS OF THE CRIMES ACT RECEIVING 85 CHAPTER 11: COMPLICITY 86 PRINCIPAL IN THE FIRST DEGREE 86 ACTUAL PERPETRATOR 86 JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES [ALL PARTIES ARE CHARGED AS PRINCIPAL IN THE FIRST DEGREE] 86 DOCTRINE OF COMMON PURPOSE PART OF J.C.E. 87 WITHDRAWAL FROM A JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE R V ROOK [1993] 87 INNOCENT AGENT [THE CONTROLLER IS CONVICTED AS PRINCIPAL IN THE FIRST DEGREE] 88 PRINCIPAL IN THE SECOND DEGREE 89 CONSPIRACY 92 ATTEMPT 93 INCITEMENT 93 ***EVERY CRUCIAL CASE*** 94 R V HALLETT [1969] SASR {NOVUS ACTUS INTERVENIENS - CAUSATION} 94 R V CRABBE [1985] 156 CLR 464; 58 ALR {FORESEEABILITY - WILFULL BLINDNESS - RECKLESS INDIFFERENCE} 96 ROYALL V R [1991] 172 CLR 378; 100 ALR {CAUSATION} 98 R V BLAUE [1975] 1 WLR {NOVUS ACTUS INTERVENIENS - TAKE YOUR VICTIM AS YOU SEE THEM} 99 R V SMITH [1959] 2 QB {MURDER - CAUSATION - OPERATING CAUSE} 100 3
4 FAGAN V METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONER [1969] 1 QB {BATTERY - ASSAULT - CONTEMPORANEITY - CONTINUOUS ACT} 101 EVANS & GARDINER (NO 2) [1976] 101 {NOVUS ACTUS INTERVENIENS} 101 R V RYAN AND WALKER [1966] VR {CONSTRUCTIVE MALICE / MURDER - FURTHERANCE OF THE COMMISSION OF A FELONY} 102 R V BUTCHER [1986] VR {MURDER - HOMICIDE BY UNLAWFUL ACT} 102 R V CORNELISSEN [2004] NSWCCA {JOINT ENTERPRISE - MANSLAUGHTER - UNLAWFUL AND DANGEROUS ACT} 103 NYDAM V R [1977] VR {MANSLAUGHTER - CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE} 103 R V PULLMAN [1991] 25 NSWLR 89; 58 A CRIM R {INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER - UNLAWFUL AND DANGEROUS ACT} 104 R V LAVENDER [2005] 104 {INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER - CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE} 104 WILSON V R [1992] HCA {INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER - CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE} 104 ***CRIMINAL PROCEDURE NOTES*** 105 CHAPTERS 1 & 2: CRIMINAL TRIAL & ARREST 105 JURY 105 ARREST 106 WARRANTS 109 PROTECTED PERSONS 109 CHAPTER 3: BAIL 110 SHOW CAUSE 112 CHAPTERS 8 & 9: IRAC & CASE BRIEFING 112 HOW TO WRITE A CASE BRIEF 112 SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR A CASE BRIEF 113 CHAPTER 4: SEARCH AND SEIZURE 114 FAMILY VIOLENCE 115 MOTOR VEHICLES 116 COMMONWEALTH: TERRORISM OR SERIOUS OFFENCE 116 EVIDENCE 117 4
5 Chapter 1: Foundations Three Justifications For Criminalisation: 1. Prevention of harm 2. Public interest - public wrongs, opposed to private wrongs (civil law), will be the subject of criminal law. 3. Morality - for conduct to be classed as criminal, it must involve moral wrongdoing. Criminalisation: The process of deeming acts criminally punishable. Writ of error: A writ issued by the appellate court, demanding that the lower court convey the record of a case to the appellate court so that the record may be reviewed for alleged errors of law committed during a juridical proceeding. Transgression: Contravention of a law, rule, or code of conduct. Elements of Guilt Actus Reus: The physical element of conduct constituting an offence; in order for there to be an actus reus, the conduct must be voluntary. Automatism (involuntary acts, which happen whilst asleep or unconscious) establishes a failure to prove actus reus, meaning that the alleged offender did not in fact commit the offence. Mens Rea: The mental element of conduct constituting an offence, which renders an offender guilty. Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea simply means that an act is not necessarily a guilty act unless the accused has the necessary state of mind required for that offence. Negligence: A falling short of the standard of care that would usually be exercised by a reasonable person; coupled with a substantially obvious risk. Criminal law insists upon a higher degree of negligence than does civil law. Strict & Absolute Liability: No Mens Rea is required to prove the defendant guilty of an offence under these rules. 5
6 Criminal Responsibility of Children A child below the age of 10 has no criminal responsibility (s 7.1 The Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)), whilst a child above the age of 10 but not yet 14 can be criminally responsible for an offence if the child knows that his or her conduct is wrong (s 7.2). The prosecution has the burden of proving whether or not the child knows that his or her conduct is wrong. Children s Courts are governed by the Children s Court Act 1987 (NSW) Doli Incapax: The presumption that a child is incapable of wrongdoing / crime. Argument: It seems obvious that children in the final stages of the 20th century are better educated and more sophisticated than their counterparts 200 years ago. A child of 12 in Australia has access to television, radio and the Internet, and has a far greater understanding of the world than a 12 year old at the time of the formation of this term. The prosecution may obtain information from teachers who know the child well. Corporations A corporation will be liable for the criminal acts of its officers and employees if it can be shown that those acts were, in reality, the acts of the corporation. s 12.1(1) of The Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), states: This Code applies to bodies corporate in the same way as it applies to individuals. It so applies with such modifications as are set out in this Part, and with such other modifications as are made necessary by the fact that criminal liability is being imposed on bodies corporate rather than individuals. Punishment upon a corporation can include revocation of a licence, imposition of restrictions, and heavy fines (heavier than those of which can be placed upon a person). ss 4B(3) of Crimes Act 1914 (Cth); and 360A of Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), provide that a fine may be imposed upon a corporation where imprisonment is the only punishment provided for an offence. It is very doubtful that a corporation would be put on trial for murder, since a mandatory sentence to imprisonment is prescribed in all jurisdictions of Australia. The Aims of Punishment 1. Retribution: The punishment deserved to one who is guilty of committing an offence 2. Deterrence 3. Rehabilitation Plea Bargaining: When the case comes to court, it may be that the offender will offer to plead guilty to some of the charges if the remainder of them is dropped. 6
7 The Prerogative of Mercy: The power of the Crown to pardon an offender. It is also open to the Crown to require a lesser penalty than that imposed by the court, being it a shorter term of imprisonment to be served or a part-reduction of a fine to be paid. Motive: The circumstances leading a person to engage in certain conduct. Criminal law pays no attention to motive when deciding whether or not a defendant is guilty of committing an offence. Misappropriation / Embezzlement: The intentional, illegal use of the property or funds of another person for one's own use or other unauthorized purpose, particularly by a public official, a trustee of a trust, an executor or administrator of a dead person's estate Larceny: Theft; stealing. Whether it be grand or petty larceny, it is all punishable as larceny. s 117 of Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 19A pertains to murder Double Jeopardy Special pleas are Autrefois convict (previously convicted) and Autrefois acquit (previously acquitted). A defendant may plead autrefois acquit should she or he be subsequently indicted for the same offence. The notion of autrefois acquit does not prevent a further prosecution for the same class of offence when committed against a different person. Abuse of Process It is an abuse of process for the prosecution to seek to rely on evidence, which is only relevant given the assumption that the accused was guilty of an offence, of which he or she was previously acquitted. In R v Storey [1978] 22 ALR 47, two men who were being prosecuted for abduction and rape, were acquitted of the rape charge. This being appealed be the prosecution in the High Court, was dismissed on the principle that a verdict of acquittal must not be challenged at a subsequent trial, and that an accused must be given the full benefit of such a verdict (Stated: Barwick CJ at 51-2). Evidence may not be used for the purpose of challenging, or diminishing the benefits to the accused of, the acquittal. Miscarriage of Justice: The conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Perjury (Crimes Act 1900 s 327) Where an accused has been acquitted of an offence, he or she may not be convicted of perjury in respect of evidence given by him or her at that earlier trial. In R v Carroll [2002] 194 ALR 1, the High Court held that it is an abuse of process for the prosecution to seek to go behind the earlier verdict of acquittal even though the verdict was obtained, in part at least, as a consequence of fraud. In the UK, since 2003, Part 10 of the Criminal Justice Act [2003] (UK) provides new prosecution rights of appeal against acquittal. 7
8 Burdens of Proof The Legal Burden: Risk of failure to persuade the trier of fact; the legal burden of proof lies on the prosecutor. The classic discussion of the legal burden is found in Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462. The Evidential Burden: The burden of the prosecution having to prove guilt upon the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In the case of insanity for example, the evidential burden is on the accused to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they were insane at the time of committing the offence. Refer to Insanity as a Defence below. Also the burden of the accused to prove irreproachable in such circumstances as being caught with possession of illicit drugs. Standard of Proof The prosecution must prove to the trier-of-fact on the balance of probabilities that the accused committed the alleged offence. The prosecution must prove this beyond reasonable doubt. Excusable Homicide (Florida Statute): Homicide is excusable when committed by accident and misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means with usual ordinary caution, and without any unlawful intent, or by accident and misfortune in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation, or upon a sudden combat, without any dangerous weapon being used and not done in a cruel or unusual manner. Insanity as a Defence If an accused was insane at the time of committing the act or omission that constitutes the Actus Reus, that person could not have committed an offence. The evidential burden of proving insanity clearly lies on the accused. Every person is presumed to be sane. However, in Davis v United States [1895] 160 US 469, the United States Supreme Court held the burden to rest upon the prosecution. 8
9 Appeals in Australia The first trial lies from the trial court to the Full Court of the Supreme Court or to the Court of Appeal. A further appeal can be taken to the High Court of Australia (only if that court gives its special leave). The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in relation to appeals is spelled out by statute (Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) ss 6-8). The courts have power to dismiss an appeal if satisfied that no substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred. The power, however, is treated as being exercisable only if the court is satisfied that a jury, which was not acting perversely, would inevitably have convicted the accused if it had received correct instructions from the trial judge. Appeals Against Acquittal The Crown has no general right of appeal against a jury s verdict of acquittal. If the jury convicts the accused, and the decision is reversed by an appellate court, then the Crown is open to seek appeal against that decision to the High Court of Australia. Appeals Against Sentence Pertaining to the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5; and the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 567, a prisoner is able to appeal against the sentence passed on him or her. In NSW and Vic, the appellate court has power to increase the sentence even in cases where the appeal has been brought by the prisoner (Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) ss 5D, 6(3); Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) ss 567A(4), 568(4). 9
10 Chapter 2: Assault and Related Offences Contact: No injury Common assault (battery) s 61 Actus Reus Non-consensual contact Mens Rea Intention to make contact Defence Consent (cannot consent to unlawful activity) Collins v Wilcox Contact: Some injury Assault occasioning actual bodily harm s 51 Actus Reus Non-consensual contact causing actual bodily harm Mens Rea Intention to make non-consensual contact Recklessness D foresees possibility of harm Defence Consent (can consent to rough horse play) Brown; Wilson (engrave initials) Contact: Serious injury Assault occasioning GBH s 54 Actus Reus Non-consensual contact causing grievous bodily harm Mens Rea Intention to cause GBH s 33 Recklessness as to causing GBH (D foresees possibility of some harm) s 35 GBH by unlawful act No Defence Not able to consent to GBH Brown 10
11 Common Assault Can be either psychological (threat) or physical (battery) Was it a mere threat or was there battery? If there was battery Did it cause actual bodily harm or wounding? Did it cause GBH? Was it aggravated? Was there consent? Was it legally possible to consent? Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61 Common assault prosecuted by indictment Whosoever assaults any person, although not occasioning actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years. Threat Actus reus for common assault by threat is putting a person in fear or apprehension of physical violence; the fault element is the desire to create that fear. The expectation of physical contact constitutes the threat, even if the person is so far away that pursuing the threat would be impossible Mostyn Desire to place a person in fear suffices, even if the person did not actually fear Brady v Schatzer Does the victim need to be frightened? It was held that it is necessary Ryan v Kuhl How immediate does the threat need to be? Is a conditional threat assault? Knight; Rozsa v Samuels Conditional threats are not an assault, there was no immediate danger to the victim and the conviction was quashed Knight Taxi drivers were fighting about who was first in the queue, and one taxi driver threatened the other by reaching for a knife and threatening to use force I will cut you to bits, but will only attack you in self-defence the conditional threat became assault, because the amount of threat was beyond what would reasonably constitute self-defence Rozsa v Samuels Threats to harm the person in the future Zanker Does assault cover cases where the person does not desire to create the fear but knows it is likely to happen? Actual knowledge of the creation of fear is necessary McPherson v Brown To point a rifle at a victim who was unaware of what was going on was not an assault but held to be attempted assault (Barwick CJ) State v Barry (1912) unless it accidentally discharges and kills the victim manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act Pemble v R (1971) It is an assault to point a loaded gun if apprehension is thereby created R v St George (1840) 11
12 The accused and the victim were in neighbouring cubicles; the accused thrust a knife through a hole to stop the victim from annoying him. The knife had not frightened the victim. McGarvie J held that there was no case for assault, as the victim was not apprehended. The accused could have been charged with attempted assault Ryan v Kuhl (1979) Battery Bringing about of non-consensual contact with the person consent is a defence to battery. Defence to battery is consent is there a type of assault, to which one cannot consent? Any touching of the person, no matter how slight, may constitute a battery the appellant was grabbed by a police officer for questioning it was held that this did not constitute battery. We do consent to a lot of touching in normal day life, however the touching by the police officer was an unlawful assault, as the officer continually touched the appellant Collins v Wilcox Assault is an alternative verdict to grievous bodily harm R v Taylor (1869); R v Snewing [1972] Mens Rea for Assault Either intention to cause non-consensual contact or recklessness is required in order for there to be an assault contemporaneity of mens rea and actus reus Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] QB The mens rea can be created after the actus reus has already been done the accused created a fire and did not put it out Miller The degree of reckless indifference for murder is different to that of lesser crimes the foresight of possible injury is all that is required, opposed to probable R v Williams Police officers were struggling to arrest the appellant, who fell to the ground and lashed out wildly using his legs. In doing so, he kicked an officer in the hand, fracturing a bone. The appellant was convicted He lashed out with his feet, reckless as to who was there, not caring one iota as to whether he kicked somebody R v Venna [1976] QB An assault is not established by proof of a deliberate act, which gives rise to consequences, which are not intended the required mens rea must be established R v Lamb [1967] ER 12
13 Intentionally causing serious injury to a child Broking J: In the present case, the learned trial judge told the jury that the requirement that serious injury must be intentionally caused was met if the accused intended to do the act, which in fact caused serious injury. It was not necessary that the accused should have intended to cause serious injury. If the accused intended to do the act, and the act in fact caused serious injury, the offence was committed R v Westaway (1991) VSC Assault Cases Threats A threat of violence over the phone could be classed as a threat of immediate violence R v Knight (1988) Threats made by a driver of a moving vehicle to the passenger can create an apprehension of imminent harm for the purpose of psychological assault. The threats made by the accused is these cases made the victim jump out of the car D gave P a lift and as they were driving, offered her money for sexual favours, which she refused. He then increasingly accelerated while the plaintiff demanded to be let out. D said, I am going to take you to my mate s house. He will really fix you up. Plaintiff jumped out of the car at 60 km/h and was injured. D was held liable for assault Zanker v Vartzokas (1988); R v Roberts (1971) Actual bodily harm / wounding Actual bodily harm covers any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim, provided it is something more than merely transient and trifling R v Donovan [1934] KB The defendant has to only have had the intention to cause common assault, not to inflict actual bodily harm Coulter Cutting a person s hair constitutes assault occasioning actual bodily harm DPP v Smith [2006] Psychiatric injury constitutes assault occasioning actual bodily harm (however, in this case the distress suffered by the victim did not amount to legally recognised psychiatric injury) R v Chan-Fook [1994] Evidence of free bleeding will suffice to prove a wound was inflicted R v Devine (1982) The accused was very drunk and ordered his wife and daughter to go to bed. He realised that his wife had not gone to bed, and told her that he would make it so that she couldn t go to bed. The wife ran to the window and was held by the daughter. They were both very frightened. The accused ordered the daughter to let the wife go, and so she did. The wife fell to the pavement and sustained injuries. The accused was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and maliciously inflicting GBH. 13
14 Lord Coleridge CJ: If a man creates in another man s mind an immediate sense of danger, which causes such person to try to escape, and in doing so he injures himself, the person who creates such a state of mind is responsible for the resulting injuries R v Halliday [ ] The accused s fiancé informed him that she suspected the foreign exchange student had stolen her engagement ring. They questioned the student, then locked him in a room. He tried to escape but was injured jumping out of a window. The accused was not convicted, as although the phrase actual bodily harm was capable of including psychiatric injury, it did not include distress, panic, or hysteria, nor did it include states of mind that were not evident of an identifiable clinical condition R v Chan- Fook [1994] ER Other kinds of battery The accused punched a woman in the face while she was holding her 12-month-old child. As a result, the child fell from her arms and hit his head on the floor. The accused was convicted of battery upon the child the movement, by which the woman lost hold of the child, was entirely and immediately the result of the accused s action in punching her the battery was reckless rather than intentional Heystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire [2000] Spitting can constitute an assault although there is no touching (battery) DPP v JWH 17 October (1997) NSWSC (Unreported) Grievous bodily harm The accused hit another man in the eye, causing the victim to lose most of the sight in that eye. He was convicted of maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm R v Salisbury [1976] VR The accused was convicted of maliciously inflicting GBH; he put out the gaslights in a theatre and placed an iron bar across the doorway of an exit. In the resulting panic, several people were injured. It is not necessary to constitute the offence that the accused directly must inflict injury upon the victim R v Martin (1881) Aggravated assault: attempted murder The accused and his female companion were arguing while drunk in a car park. Three men became involved and a gun belonging to the accused was discharged, seriously injuring one of the three. The accused was charged with attempted murder, intentionally causing serious injury, and recklessly causing serious injury R v Campbell [1997] VR 14
15 Aggravated assault: police officer executing duties An assault is any act, which intentionally or recklessly causes another person to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] QB 15
16 Aggravated Assault: Accompanied by particular intention Assault with Intent to Kill (Attempted Murder) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss S 27: Acts done to the person with intent to murder Whosoever: Administers to, or causes to be taken by, any person any poison, or other destructive thing; or By any means wounds, or causes grievous bodily harm to any person With intent in any such case to commit murder, shall be liable to imprisonment for 25 years. S 28: Acts done to property with intent to murder Whosoever: Sets fire to any vessel, or any chattel therein, or any part of her tackle apparel or furniture, or Casts away or destroys any vessel, or By the explosion of gunpowder, or other explosive substance, destroys, or damages any building, or Places, or throws, any matter or thing upon or across a railway, or Removes, or displaces any sleeper, or other thing belonging to a railway With intent in any such case to commit murder, shall be liable to imprisonment for 25 years. S 29: Certain other attempts to murder Whosoever: Attempts to administer to, or cause to be taken by, any person any poison, or other destructive thing, or Shoots at, or in any manner attempts to discharge any kind of loaded arms at any person, or Attempts to drown, suffocate, or strangle any person With intent in any such case to commit murder, shall, whether any bodily injury is effected or not, be liable to imprisonment for 25 years. S 30: Attempts to murder by other means Whosoever: By any means other than those specified in sections 27 to 29 both inclusive, attempts to commit murder shall be liable to imprisonment for 25 years. 16
(1) Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for five years.
SAMPLE Aggravated Assault s 59 Assault Occasioning ABH 59 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (1) Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment
More informationLAWS1021 Crime and the Criminal Process Intent and Reckless Indifference... Constructive Murder... Unlawful act causing manslaughter (reckless
LAWS1021 Crime and the Criminal Process Intent and Reckless Indifference... Constructive Murder... Unlawful act causing manslaughter (reckless indifference to human life) - involves reasonable man test...
More informationLAW1114: CRIMINAL LAW EXAM NOTES
LAW1114: CRIMINAL LAW EXAM NOTES CONTENTS TOPIC COMMON OTHER 1 S OF A CRIME 2 NON- FATAL, NON- SEXUAL AGAINST THE PERSON 3 SEXUAL 4 HOMICIDE 5 DEFENCES AR (p3) - Positive, voluntary act (PVA) - Causation
More informationJURD7122/LAWS1022 Criminal Laws
JURD7122/LAWS1022 Criminal Laws MURDER... 5 ELEMENTS... 5 ACTUS REUS... 5 Voluntariness... 5 Ommission... 5 Causation... 5 MENS REA... 5 Heads of mens rea:... 5 Intention to kill... 5 Intention to inflict
More informationMLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES
MLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES Contents Topic 1: Course Overview... 3 Sources of Criminal Law... 4 Requirements for Criminal Liability... 4 Topic 2: Homicide and Actus Reus... Error! Bookmark not defined. Unlawful
More informationCriminal Law. Text, Cases, and Materials. Janet Loveless. Third Edition UNIVERSITY PRESS
Criminal Law Text, Cases, and Materials Third Edition Janet Loveless UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Guide to using the book Guide to the Online Resource Centre this edition Preface Acknowledgements Table cases
More information1 Criminal Responsibility
1 Criminal Responsibility 1.1 Who can commit crimes? A person who is: Over the age of 18 A rational being Capable of understanding the difference between right and wrong Able to control conscious actions
More informationCRIMINAL LAW FINAL EXAM SUMMARY
CRIMINAL LAW FINAL EXAM SUMMARY Contents WEEK ONE CONTENT... Error! Bookmark not Woolmington v DPP [1935]... 7 Green v The Queen (1971)... 7 Youseff (1990)... 7 Zecevic v DPP (1987)... 7 WEEK 2 CONTENT...
More informationPART 1: THE FUNDAMENTALS...
Contents PART 1: THE FUNDAMENTALS... 6 The Fundamentals of Criminal Law (CHAPTER 1)... 6 Sources of criminal law:... 6 Criminal capacity:... 7 Children:... 7 Corporations:... 7 Classifications of crimes:...
More informationMLL214&'CRIMINAL'NOTES' ''''''! Topic 1: Introduction and Overview
! Topic 1: Introduction and Overview Introduction Criminal law has both a substantive and procedural component. o Substantive: defining and understanding the constituent elements of the various common
More informationCriminal Law A Flowchart
Part 1: Has A Crime Been Committed Actus Reas (Physical Element of Crime): Criminal Law A Flowchart 1. Automatism and Voluntariness a. Was the act done by a sane mind and was voluntary? i. Accidents count
More informationCriminal Law Exam Notes
Criminal Law Exam Notes Contents LARCENY... Error! Bookmark not defined. Actus Reus... Error! Bookmark not defined. Taking & Carrying Away... Error! Bookmark not defined. Property Capable of Being Stolen...
More informationIntroduction Crime, Law and Morality. Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax.
Introduction Crime, Law and Morality Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax. Objective Principles: * Constructive-murder rule: a person may be guilty of murder, if while in
More informationCRM 321 Mod 5 Lecture Notes
CRM 321 Mod 5 Lecture Notes In this module we will examine the worst of the crimes that can be committed - crimes against persons. Persons crimes are distinguished from so-called victimless crimes, crimes
More informationMLL214: CRIMINAL LAW
MLL214: CRIMINAL LAW 1 Examinable Offences: 2 Part 1: The Fundamentals of Criminal Law The definition and justification of the criminal law The definition of crime Professor Glanville Williams defines
More informationCRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD
CRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW 7 DEFINITION OF CRIMINAL LAW 7 Deterrence 7 Rehabilitation 7 Public Protection 7 Retribution 8 CRIMINAL LAW AND
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAW (CHAPTER 1 PAGE 3) WEEK 1 INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW & OFFENCES OF STRICT & ABSOLUTE LIABILITY
1 MLL214 Notes Criminal Law THE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAW (CHAPTER 1 PAGE 3) WEEK 1 INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW & OFFENCES OF STRICT & ABSOLUTE LIABILITY Criminal law is made up of both a substantive and
More information1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention
1) 11 CHOOSE THE BEST CHOICE AND MARK IT ON YOUR ANSWER SHEET. Part A: Fill in the Blanks 1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention. A person is where
More informationCHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law
CHAPTER 14 Criminal Law and Juvenile Law CRIMINAL LAW Chapter 14 Section I Case File and 345-347 Review the case file at the beginning of the chapter. Think about the situation (however exaggerated it
More informationUNIT 2 Part 1 CRIMINAL LAW
UNIT 2 Part 1 CRIMINAL LAW 1 OBJECTIVES: Differentiate between federal and state laws and develop understanding between crimes against people, and crimes against property. NBEA STANDARD I: Analyze the
More information10: Dishonest Acquisition
WEEK (week beginning Monday) 1 (28 July) 1 2 (4 August) 3 CLASS CHAPTER TOPIC PAGE NOS. 2 5: Homicide 4 3 (11 August) 5 4 (18 August) 7 6 6: Defences 8 Introduction, (some classes may view a video and/or
More informationCRIM EXAM NOTES. Table of Contents. Weeks 1-4
CRIM EXAM NOTES Weeks 1-4 Table of Contents Setup (jurisdiction, BOP, onus)... 2 Elements, AR, Voluntariness... 3 Voluntariness, Automatism... 4 MR (intention, reckless, knowledge, negligence)... 5 Concurrence...
More informationContents PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY Chapter 1: Fundamental Principles of Criminal Liability 1: Actus Reus 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Conduct as
More informationHSC Legal Studies. Year 2017 Mark Pages 46 Published Feb 6, Legal Studies: Crime. By Rose (99.4 ATAR)
HSC Legal Studies Year 2017 Mark 97.00 Pages 46 Published Feb 6, 2017 Legal Studies: Crime By Rose (99.4 ATAR) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Your notes author, Rose. Rose achieved an ATAR of 99.4 in
More informationCriminal Law Outline intent crime
This outline was created for the July 2006 Oregon bar exam. The law changes over time, so use with caution. If you would like an editable version of this outline, go to www.barexammind.com/outlines. Criminal
More informationA CASEBOOK ON SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW
A CASEBOOK ON SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW Fourth Edition Christopher H.W. Gane, LL.B., Professor of Scots Law, University of Aberdeen Charles N. Stoddart, LL.B., LL.M. (McGill), Ph.D., Formerly Sheriff of Lothian
More informationOBJECTIVES: Differentiate between federal and state laws and develop understanding between crimes against people, and crimes against property.
UNIT 2 CRIMINAL LAW 1 OBJECTIVES: Differentiate between federal and state laws and develop understanding between crimes against people, and crimes against property. NBEA STANDARD I: Analyze the different
More information~~~~~ Week 6. Element of a Crime
~~~~~ Week 6 Element of a Crime PHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF A CRIME (AR) Physical elements may refer to: o A specified form of conduct such as: An act; An omission; or There is a CL duty not to cause harm to
More informationLAWS106 CRIMINAL LAW Semester
Week One: The Criminal Law Chapter One of Text What is a crime? LAWS106 CRIMINAL LAW Semester 1 2014 Professor Glanville Williams defines a crime as: 'A crime (or offence) is a legal wrong that can be
More informationThe Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1
CONTENTS Preface xiii Acknowledgments About the Author xv xvii I. CHAPTER 1 The Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1 A. Introduction 1 1. The Purpose of Criminal Law 1 a) Morality and Blame 2 b) The
More informationMLL214 CRIMINAL LAW 2013 MICHAEL KRIEWALDT
MLL214 CRIMINAL LAW 2013 MICHAEL KRIEWALDT THE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAW 1 1. Introduction In this unit we are looking at the basic principles and underlying rationales of the substantive criminal law.
More informationCRIMINAL LAW. Problem Question Notes. PRINCIPLES... 1 Capacity Actus Reus Mens Rea... 4 Coincidence... 6!
CRIMINAL LAW Problem Question Notes PRINCIPLES... 1 Capacity... 2 Actus Reus... 3 Mens Rea... 4 Coincidence... 6 OFFENCES... 7 Common Assault... 8 Actus Reus... 8 Mens Rea... 9 Consent to Harm... 10 Aggravated
More informationESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY
I. PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW a. Actus reus b. Mens rea c. Concurrence d. Causation II. III. ESSAY APPROACH www.barexamdoctor.com CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY a. Elements of accomplice liability
More informationI. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.
I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i. A specific intent crime is one in which an actual intent on the part of the
More informationTo begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be:
Homicide Offences To begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be: Murder or voluntary manslaughter if partial defences
More informationCRIMINAL LAW. Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series. 4th edition
CRIMINAL LAW Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series 4th edition Alan Reed, M.A., LL.M., Solicitor Professor of Criminal and Private International Law, University of Sunderland and Ben Fitzpatrick, B.A., P.G.C.L.T.H.E.
More informationCRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #2 MODEL ANSWER. 1. With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss.
CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #2 MODEL ANSWER As Dan walked down a busy city street one afternoon, Vic, a scruffy, long-haired young man, approached him. For some time, Dan had been plagued
More informationCriminal Law II Overview Jan June 2006
Inchoate Liability Incitement Incitement is the common law offence (see Whitehouse [1977]) of influencing the mind of another whilst intending him to commit a crime. Its actus reus is the actual communication
More informationHomicide: Intent and Reckless Indifference [Week 1B]! Wednesday, 30 July 2014! 3:12 pm! Criminal Laws (Brown et al) [ ]!! Homicide: Murder and
Homicide: Intent and Reckless Indifference [Week 1B] Wednesday, 30 July 2014 3:12 pm Criminal Laws (Brown et al) [425-448] Homicide: Murder and Involuntary Manslaughter Patterns of Homicide: A Wallace,
More informationAdministrative-Master Syllabus form approved June/2006 revised Page 1 of 1
revised 11-02-06 Page 1 of 1 Administrative - Master Syllabus I. Topical Outline Each offering of this course must include the following topics (be sure to include information regarding lab, practicum,
More informationTopic 5 Non-fatal,Non-sexual offences against the person
Topic 5 Non-fatal,Non-sexual offences against the person Examine how the criminal law deals with some common harms against the person and cover the elements of several non-fatal, non-sexual offences against
More informationCRIMINAL LAW TJ MCINTYRE SEAN Ô TOGHDA
CRIMINAL LAW TJ MCINTYRE SEAN Ô TOGHDA ROUND HALL THOMSON REUTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Preface Table of Cases Table of vii ix xix xxxi CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 1 Defining the Criminal Law 1 Background
More informationQuestion With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss. 2. What defense or defenses might Dan assert? Discuss.
Question 2 As Dan walked down a busy city street one afternoon, Vic, a scruffy, long-haired young man, approached him. For some time, Dan had been plagued by a pathological fear that long-haired transients
More informationBUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes
BUSINESS LAW Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes Learning Objectives List and describe the essential elements of a crime. Describe criminal procedure, including arrest, indictment, arraignment, and
More informationADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW. Name: Period: Row:
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW Name: Period: Row: I. INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW A. Understanding the complexities of criminal law 1. The justice system in the United States
More informationSTANSFIELD COLLEGE CRIMINAL LAW Non-Fatal Offences
STANSFIELD COLLEGE CRIMINAL LAW Non-Fatal Offences 2013-2014 CRIMINAL LAW LECTURE 2005 A Q6 1 H hears a rumour that I, his partner, has been unfaithful to him. He grabs at her shoulder but she ducks and
More informationIntroduction to Criminal Law
Introduction to Criminal Law CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Crimes versus Civil Wrongs 2 Types of Criminal Offences 3 General Principles of Criminal Law 4 Accessories and Parties to Crimes 5 Attempted
More informationFlorida Jury Instructions. 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE (1)(a), Fla. Stat.
Florida Jury Instructions 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE 782.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat. When there will be instructions on both premeditated and felony, the following explanatory paragraph should be read to the jury.
More informationCRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY 2011
SUMMARY 2011 LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES DISCRETION TO ARREST Internal police guidelines LEGALITY OF ARREST POLICE INTERVIEW IN CUSTODY PHYSICAL ELEMENTS Conduct Conduct which occurs
More informationIntroduction to Criminal Law
Winter 2019 Introduction to Criminal Law Recognizing Offenses Shoplifting equals Larceny Criminal possession of stolen property. Punching someone might be Assault; or Harassment; or Menacing Recognizing
More informationCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition Chapter 3 Criminal Law The Nature and Purpose of Law (1 of 2) Law A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, that proscribes
More informationChoose the best choice and mark it on your answer sheet. Part A: Fill in the Blanks
: : : : ( ) : : : : : / Choose the best choice and mark it on your answer sheet. Part A: Fill in the Blanks 1-The physical element of a crime is the 1. mens rea 2. actus reus 3. offence 4. intention 2-A
More informationLLB130 NOTES !!!!!!!!
! LLB130 NOTES!!!!!!!! Contents Defining Crime 4 Components of Criminal Offences I 9 General Principles 9 Actus Reus and Mens Rea 10 Actus Reus 11 Mens Rea 14 Criminal Responsibility and the Burden of
More informationSAMPLE Criminal Law HD Exam Scaffold
SEXUAL ASAULT -s 61I Crimes Act 'Basic' sexual assault: Actus reus: the Crown must prove BRD both of the following limbs: 1. The accused must have had sexual intercourse with the victim. Sexual penetration
More informationSection 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree
Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631 THE LAW Wyoming Statutes (1982) Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section 6-4-101. Murder in the First Degree (a) Whoever purposely
More informationFAULT ELEMENTS, STRICT LIABILITY AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY. Generally involves an actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind).
FAULT ELEMENTS, STRICT LIABILITY AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY CRIME A wrong punishable by the State. Generally involves an actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind). Description of a prohibited behaviour
More information1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person
1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person I. ASSAULT AND BATTERY A. In General. 1. Nature of Offenses. (a) [ 1] In General. (b) [ 2] Relationship Between Offenses. (c) [ 3] Classification
More informationOffences 3. S300 Unlawful homicide 3. S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4. S303 Manslaughter 7. S335 Common Assault 9
4032LAW Exam Notes Offences 3 S300 Unlawful homicide 3 S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4 S303 Manslaughter 7 S335 Common Assault 9 S339 Assault occasioning bodily harm 10 S340 Serious assaults 11 S317 Acts
More informationMLL214 Criminal Law Exam Notes and Cases
MLL214 Criminal Law Exam Notes and Cases 1 Topic 1 Introduction to Criminal Law Contents Page Page 6: Fundamentals of Criminal Law Page 7: Strict Liability Page 8: Absolute Liability Page 9: Case: He Kew
More informationCRIMINAL LITIGATION PRE-COURSE MATERIALS
Legal Practice Course 2014-2015 CRIMINAL LITIGATION PRE-COURSE MATERIALS Copyright Bristol Institute of Legal Practice, UWE AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LITIGATION 1. Introduction: You will be studying
More informationBusiness Law Chapter 9 Handout
Major Differences: 2 Felonies Serious crimes, punishable by Death or prison for more than one (1) year. Misdemeanors Non-serious (petty) crimes punishable by jail for less than one(1) year and/or by fines.
More informationUNLAWFUL AND DANGEROUS ACT MANSLAUGHTER:
Unlawful and Dangerous Act Manslaughter 228 UNLAWFUL AND DANGEROUS ACT MANSLAUGHTER: R. v. WILLS1 The defendant ("D") was out shopping with his de facto wife when he saw in the street his legal wife from
More informationState Qualifying Exam Preparation Guide
State Qualifying Exam Preparation Guide (CJ) Exams developed in partnership with Cengage Learning. Book Information Criminal Law and Procedure Author: Daniel E. Hall ISBN-13: 9781285448817 7th Edition
More informationOffences specified in Schedule 15 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003
Offences specified in Schedule 15 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Part 1 Specified Violent Offences 1 Manslaughter. 2 Kidnapping. 3 False imprisonment. 4 An offence under section 4 of the Offences against
More informationChildren Law - Barbados Abortion; Child stealing; Concealment of birth; Endangering life of children; Infanticide
Country Code: BB 1994 ACT 18 Title: Country: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT BARBADOS Reference: 18/1994 Date of entry into force: September 1, 1994 Date of Amendment: Subject: Key words: Children Law
More informationCRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS
CRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS Fifth Edition by C. M. V. CLARKSON, B.A.,LL.B.,LL.M. Trofessor oflaw, University ofleicester H. M. KEATING, LL.M. Senior Lecturer in Law, University ofsussex LONDON SWEET
More informationInspectors OSPRE Part 1 Statistics - Crime
Inspectors OSPRE Part 1 Statistics - Crime Topic 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Probability Ratings 1 Question 5 Questions 4 Questions 3 Questions 3 Questions 3.2 Questions Child abduction Child Abduction x
More informationLecture 3: The American Criminal Justice System
Lecture 3: The American Criminal Justice System Part 1. Classification of Law Part 2. Functions of Criminal Law Part 3: Complexity of Law Part 4: Legal Definition of Crime Part 5: Criminal Defenses Part
More informationUnderlying principles of Criminal Liability
Actus Reus 2 of 9 THE GUILTY ACT! Involuntary Acts - does not form actus reus - Hill v Baxter (1958); swarm of bees Omissions - a failure to act is not an act. Where a person's contract requires him to
More informationSlide 1. Slide 2 Basic denial defence which is used when the accused claims that he or she was not present at the time of the offence.
Slide 1 (including Excuses and Justifications) Slide 2 Basic denial defence which is used when the accused claims that he or she was not present at the time of the offence. Independent evidence supporting
More informationTIER 2 EXCLUSIONARY CRIMES
TIER 2 EXCLUSIONARY S Violent or Serious Felonies, Offenses Requiring Registration as a Sex Offender and Felony Offenses for Fraud Against a Public Social Services Program Pursuant to Welfare and Institutions
More informationMBE WORKSHOP: CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
CHAPTER 1: CRIMINAL LAW MBE WORKSHOP: CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: While the below outline is taken from the National Conference of Bar Examiners'
More informationCriminal Law Doctrine and Theory
Criminal Law Doctrine and Theory Third edition William Wilson Hartow, England - London New York Boston San f rancisco Toronto Sydney Tokyo Singapore Mong Kong Seoul Taipei New Delhi Cape Town Madrid Mexico
More informationLecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 14:15-15:15. Session 3, 16 Oct 2018
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 14:15-15:15 e-mail: miljen.matijasevic@gmail.com Session 3, 16 Oct 2018 Criminal Law, part 1 1. What does criminal law involve? 2. What is actus reus and
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Define what is meant by a crime
Tech Level Unit Title: LAW OF CRIME Level: Level 3 Credit Value: 10 Guided Learning Hours 60 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1. Understand the principles of criminal liability Assessment criteria The
More informationCRIMINAL OFFENCES. Chapter 9
CRIMINAL OFFENCES Chapter 9 LEVELS OF OFFENCES In the Canadian legal system we have three levels of criminal offences. Summary Conviction Offences Indictable Offences Hybrid Offences LEVELS OF OFFENCES:
More informationLEGAL STUDIES U1_AOS2: CRIMINAL LAW
LEGAL STUDIES U1_AOS2: CRIMINAL LAW Learning Intentions Learning Intentions: WWBAT understand and apply elements of a crime to crimes against a person. Offences Against the Person What are some of the
More informationFEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation
FEDERAL STATUTES The following is a list of federal statutes that the community of targeted individuals feels are being violated by various factions of group stalkers across the United States. This criminal
More informationGuide to Criminal Law. Contents
Introduction Contents Table of cases 1. The Development of Law 15 Customs 15 General customs 16 Local customs 16 Common law 16 Equity 18 Judicial precedents 19 The doctrine of precedents 19 Original precedents
More informationQuestion What criminal charges, if any, should be brought against Art and Ben? Discuss.
Question 3 After drinking heavily, Art and Ben decided that they would rob the local all-night convenience store. They drove Art s truck to the store, entered, and yelled, This is a stickup, while brandishing
More informationSection 17 Lesser Evils Defense 535. Chapter Ten. Offenses Against the Person. Article One. Causing Death
Section 17 Lesser Evils Defense 535 THE LAW Israeli Penal Law (1995) (5737-1977, as amended in 5754-1994) Section 298. Manslaughter Chapter Ten. Offenses Against the Person Article One. Causing Death If
More informationThe defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1
Page 1 of 11 206.30 SECOND DEGREE MURDER WHERE A DEADLY WEAPON IS USED, COVERING ALL LESSER INCLUDED HOMICIDE OFFENSES AND SELF- DEFENSE. FELONY. NOTE WELL: If self-defense is at issue and the assault
More information4. Causing serious injury intentionally in circumstances of gross violence. 2
Schedule 2 Offences 1 1. An indictable offence that is alleged to have been committed by the accused: (a) while on bail for another indictable offence; or (b) while subject to a summons to answer to a
More informationTable of Contents. Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv. A. General Principles... 1
Table of Contents Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv Chapter 1 Substantive Criminal Law A. General Principles... 1 1. Causation... 1 (a) Causation for Impaired Driving Causing Bodily Harm/Death...
More informationLEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2012
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2012 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationIndex. All references are to page numbers. assault de minimis non curat lex defence, 32 police officer, on a, 7
Index All references are to page numbers. A Aboriginal sentencing principles Aboriginal women, 291 basic principles, 282 generally, 282 manslaughter, 291, 293 practical framework, 286 street gangs, 293
More informationCriminal Code CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) (NO. 2) BILL, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES
BELIZE: CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) (NO. 2) BILL, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES 1. Short title. 2. Amendment of section 12. 3. Repeal and substitution of section 25. 4. Amendment of section 45. 5. Repeal and
More information4. What is private law? 3. What are laws? 1. Review all terms in chapters: 1, 2, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, What is the purpose of Law?
1. Review all terms in chapters: 1, 2, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 2. What is the purpose of Law? Laws reflect the values and beliefs of a society. A rule enforced by government 3. What are laws? 1)Set
More informationSergeants OSPRE Part 1 Statistics - Evidence
Sergeants OSPRE Part 1 Statistics - Evidence Topic 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Probability Rating 7 Question 6 Question 6 Question 5 Question 4 Question 5.6 Questions Grounds for Refusing Bail x2 Police Bail
More informationCriminal Law Guidebook - Chapter 10: Extending Criminal Responsibility
The following is a suggested solution to the problem question on page 246. It represents an answer of an above average standard. The ILAC approach to problem-solving as set out in the How to Answer Questions
More informationCRIMINAL LAW MURDER & MANSLAUGHTER
CRIMINAL LAW MURDER & MANSLAUGHTER This is basically a common-law offence and to constitute it there must be an unlawful killing of another human being under the Queen s peace with malice aforethought.
More informationSubject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Sergeants Examination Actus Reus (Criminal. Crime Criminal Damage Arson Contamination or Interference
Subject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Sergeants Examination 2017 Book Subject Subset Child Protection Child Abduction Child Protection Child Cruelty Police Powers under the Child Protection Actus Reus (Criminal
More informationLaw 12 Substantive Assignments Reading Booklet
Law 12 Substantive Assignments Reading Booklet Reading # 1: Police and the Law Training and Qualifications Police officers have to go through both physical and academic training to become members of the
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 - CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2011
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 - CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2011 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Criminal Law/Criminal Procedure/Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1
More informationThe defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1. Under the law and the evidence in this case, it is your duty to return
PAGE 1 OF 14 NOTE WELL: If self-defense is at issue and the assault occurred in defendant s home, place of residence, workplace or motor vehicle, see N.C.P.I. Crim. 308.80, Defense of Habitation. The defendant
More informationCRIMINAL LAW OUTLINE1
DAN WILSON'S OUTLINES My outlines are not intended to be definitive, comprehensive treatments of the various subjects. They are offered to show the thought processes of a successful bar study process.
More informationCHAPTER 2.10 EXTRADITION ACT
SAINT LUCIA CHAPTER 2.10 EXTRADITION ACT Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of the
More informationSubject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Inspectors Examination Actus Reus (Criminal. Crime Crime Child Protection Child Abduction
Subject Area Breakdown NPPF Step 2 Inspectors Examination 2017 Book Subject Subset Principals and Accessories Causal Link or Chain of Causation Intervening Act Omissions Child Protection Child Abduction
More informationPreview from Notesale.co.uk Page 1 of 63
Criminal Law General Elements of Criminal Liability A guilty act (Actus Reus) + A guilty mind (Mens Rea) - Defense (Absence of a relevant defense) = Criminal liability The terms AR and MR are simply use
More information