Attorney/Client Privilege Defined
|
|
- Rafe Johns
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Attorney-Client Privilege For In House Counsel and the Use of Personal Electronic Devices and Social Media in the Workplace An Overview and Discussion May 19, 2011 Association of Corporate Counsel West Central Florida Chapter Attorney/Client Privilege Defined The attorney-client privilege exists in order that one who is, or seeks to become a client, may consult freely with counsel without fear of compelled discovery of information communicated by him to the attorney whom he has employed, or seeks to employ. -Wigmore 2 Attorney-Client Privilege Elements 1. Where legal advice of any kind is sought 2. From a professional legal advisor in his/her capacity as such 3. Then the communications relating to that purpose 4. Made in confidence 5. Are received by counsel 6. Are at the client s insistence permanently protected 7. From disclosure by the client or by the legal advisor 8. Except if the client waives the privilege - Wigmore, Evidence
2 Courts condense Wigmore s Elements into 4 Factors 1. Communication 2. Made between privileged persons 3. In Confidence 4. For the Purpose of Seeking or Providing Legal Assistance 4 Dilemma for Corporate Counsel and the Courts Defining the scope of the privilege for in-house counsel is complicated by the fact that these attorneys frequently have multi-faceted duties that go beyond traditional tasks performed by lawyers. Courts faced with applying traditional attorney-client privilege issues to corporate counsel may generally apply a different privilege standard to communications involving corporate counsel than to outside counsel. Courts have employed a variety of factors to determine whether communications involving corporate counsel are privileged. 5 Policy Justifications 1. Encourage clients to be completely truthful with their attorneys without the fear of disclosure so that the attorneys can give effective legal advice 2. By promoting a client s freedom of consultation with an attorney the privilege fosters voluntary compliance with regulatory laws and facilitates effective administration of the laws 6 2
3 Policy Justifications The purpose of the privilege is to encourage full and frank communications between attorneys and their clients and the privilege exists not only to the giving of professional advice to those who can act on it but also the giving of information to the lawyer to enable him to give sound and informed advice. Upjohn Co. v. U.S., 449 U.S. 383 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court specifically addressing the attorney-client privilege in the context of a corporate client 7 Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege Generally accepted that a corp. is entitled to same protection of confidential communications as an individual See Fla. Stat. (2010) Shielding these discussions from discovery promotes general compliance with the law Corp. commonly consult with in-house counsel on how to comply with the law Employment Laws Contracts 8 Who May Raise the Privilege Complicated because the corporation can only communicate through its agents. Therefore, certain employees may claim the attorney-client privilege on behalf of the corporation. 9 3
4 I. Communication May be oral or written Silence? May not always protect attorney notes may not protect every communication U.S. Postal Serv. v. Phelps Dodge Refining Corp., 852 F. Supp.156 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) In-house counsel s handwritten notes containing factual info from individuals who may not be clients are not privileged Might be able to claim privilege if the conveyors of the info are agents of the client, empowered for that purpose. 10 II. Privileged Persons Generally: The client The client s attorney Communicating agents of the client and/or the attorney Agents of the attorney for purposes of the representation 11 Corporation as a Client How to Determine who is a Privileged Person Control Group Test Only individuals in the control group defined as those employees in a position to control or take part in the determination of corporate action in response to legal advice, could act as the client for purposes of the privilege Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 210 F. Supp. 483 (E.D.Pa. 1962) 12 4
5 Corporation as a Client Subject Matter Test 1. Employee, not a member of the control group, made a communication to the corporation s attorney at the direction of a superior for the purpose p of obtaining legal advice for the corporation 2. The subject matter of the issue requiring attorney advice was within the scope of the employee s duties Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 423 F.2d 487 (7th Cir. 1970) 13 Corporation as a Client Modified Subject Matter Test Added: the communication was not disseminated beyond these persons who, based on the corporate structure, needed to know its contents - Diversified Indus., Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 596 (8th Cir. 1977) - Florida Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1994) - Muro v. Target Co., 243 F.R.D. 301 (N.D. Ill. 2007) ( s containing privileged content sent by corporate counsel via a large list-serve were not privileged because not everyone on the list-serve could be identified) 14 Corporation as a Client Ampicillin Test Modified the Modified Subject Matter Test Replaced direction of corporate superior with a reasonable belief by the employee making the communication that the communication was necessary to the decision making process concerning a problem on which legal advice was sought In re Ampicillin Litigation, 81 F.R.D. 377 (D.D.C. 1978) 15 5
6 Corporation as a Client cont d Upjohn Co. v. U.S., 449 U.S. 387 (1981) - Rejected the control group test because it incorrectly focused on who was communicating as opposed to the substance of the communication - Expanded the scope of attorney-client privilege regarding corporate communications - Court stated that a determination of whether corporate attorney-client privilege existed was to be done on a case-by-case basis - But did not draft rules for applying the privilege and set forth a case-by-case standard 16 Element 3: In Confidence A communication is made in confidence if the client expressly so states or if the attorney reasonably so concludes Courts look to: Intent Location Means 17 In Confidence Complex issue in corporations because often communications must be filtered through many employees Bank Brussels Lambert v Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.,160 F.R.D. 437 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (where decision making power of corporation is diffused among several employees the dissemination of confidential communications to such persons does not defeat the privilege) 18 6
7 In Confidence: Presence of a Recording Device The presence of a recording device in an attorney-client meeting may destroy the attorneyclient privilege. See U.S. v. Thompson, No , 2007 WL (C.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2007) (a telephone conversation between an attorney and a client was not privileged when the client was aware that the telephone conversation might be recorded) 19 Element 4: For Purpose of Seeking or Obtaining Legal Advice To be privileged, communication must have been made primarily for the purpose of obtaining legal advice Upjohn Co. v U.S., 449 U.S. 383 (1981) communication privileged and protected from compelled disclosure because made to secure legal advice 20 Primary Purpose Test United States v. Chevron Corp., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8646 (N.D. Cal. May 29, 1996) A party seeking to withhold discovery based upon the attorney-client privilege must prove that all of the communications it seeks to protect were made primarily for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. No privilege can attach to any communication as to which business purpose would have served as a sufficient cause, i.e., any communication that would have been made because of a business purpose, even if there had been no perceived interest in securing legal advice. The party asserting privilege over documents must demonstrate that the communications that are sought to be protected were made primarily for the purpose of generating legal advice 21 7
8 The Professional Legal Capacity Test Georgia-Pacific Railroad Corp v. GAF Roofing, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 671 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 1996) The application of the attorney client privilege turns on whether the communication is given in the attorney s capacity as a business advisor or office of the company or in the traditional role of lawyer. 22 Transmission of Privileged Documents Within the Corporation Generally, intra-corporate distribution of legal advice received from counsel does not destroy the privilege Idea is that the corporation must be properly informed of legal advice and able to act appropriately Premiere Digital Access, Inc. v. Central Telephone Co., 360 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (D. Nev. 2005) 23 Waiver of the Attorney Client Privilege Generally, privilege waived if: 1. A client communicates confidential information to a third party 2. An attorney reveals confidential information to a third party with the client s consent Can be intentional or inadvertent 24 8
9 Corporate Client Usually assumed by courts that corporate management acts on behalf of the corporation when issues of waiver are discussed. Therefore, usually, the privilege may only be waived by members of the control group Commodity Futures Trading Comm n v. Weintraub, 471 U.S. 343 (1985) U.S. v. De Lillo, 448 F. Supp 840 (E.D.N.Y. 1978) The Board of Directors may waive the privilege Tail of the Pup, Inc. v. Webb, 528 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) And an individual director cannot go against the board s decision Wechsler v. Squadron, Ellendorf, Plesent, & Sheffield LLP., 994 F. Supp. 202 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) Unless the director is a whistleblower But if the director is wrong, he or she can be sued for breach of the director s corporate duty 25 Disclosure Within a Corporation If a member of control group conveys the attorney s advice to any other member of the control group the privilege is not waived Barr Marine Prods. Co., Inc. v Borg-Warner Corp., 84 F.R.D. 631(E.D.Pa. 1979) 26 Beyond the Control Group Upjohnsuggests a need-to-know limitation on sharing privileged information with employees who are not members of the control group Upjohn, 449 U.S. at
10 Florida Follows the Need-to-Know Requirement Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1994) 28 Waiver By Disclosure to Government Although government agencies carry big sticks, disclosure to it is like disclosure to any other third party. Courts reject notion of selective waiver: [A] party may not waive the attorney-client privilege for its own benefit to a third party government agency, then hide behind the privilege iil in civil iillitigation. Pensacola Firefighters Relief Pens. Fund Bd. of Trustees v. Merrill Lynch, 2010 WL (N.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2010). Few exceptions. See Diversified Indus., Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 596 (8 th Cir. 1977); Saito v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., 2002 WL (Del. Ch. Nov. 13, 2002), aff d, 870 A.2d 1192 (Del. 2005). 29 Some Protection On Scope: FRE 502 Advisory committee decided not to propose a selective waiver provision, it did limit scope. When disclosure is in a Federal proceeding or to a Federal office or agency, waiver is limited to what is actually disclosed unless: Waiver is intentional; Communications concern same subject matter; and Communications ought in fairness to be considered together. Exception is for unusual circumstances in order to prevent a selective and misleading presentation of evidence to the adversary
11 Inadvertent Waiver Every state is different There are three basic approaches: The Lenient Approach There is no waiver as long as there has not been a knowing and intentional relinquishment of the privilege The Intermediate Approach The court examines several factors to determine whether the disclosing party was reasonable in their actions The Strict Approach Once a disclosure has occurred, the privilege has been waived, regardless of intent 31 Inadvertent Waiver Florida takes a middle of the road approach Abamar Housing and Dev. v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor, Inc., 698 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) Inadvertent disclosure of privileged documents did not waive privilege where demonstrated that reasonable precautions were taken to prevent inadvertent disclosure 32 New Rule in Florida Fla. R. Civ. P governing inadvertent disclosure became effective 1/1/2011. Three principal provisions: A party who inadvertently discloses may serve notice within 10 days of discovery. Receiving party must return, sequester, or destroy, and take steps to retrieve materials disclosed. Receiving party may challenge privilege, including on waiver grounds. Rule does not address substantive question of whether and when an inadvertent disclosure constitutes waiver
12 Limited Waiver-Florida Paradise Divers, Inc. v. Upmal, 2006 WL (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (not a complete waiver where party produced privileged documents relating to its advice of counsel defense, but invoked privilege on other documents. 34 Inadvertent Waiver: Factors for Reasonableness Some of the factors a court can look at to determine reasonableness in a middle of the road approach are: The precautions taken to prevent an inadvertent disclosure The number of inadvertent disclosures The extent of the disclosures Any delay in measures taken to rectify the disclosures Any overriding interests in justice 35 Inadvertent Waiver and Document Management Systems Victor Stanley, Inc. v. CreativePipe, Inc., 2008 WL (D. Md. May 29, 2008). A corporation s methods to prevent inadvertent disclosure during discovery were not reasonable when the corporation attempted t to retrieve all privileged il documents from a data-base using a keyword search of 70 terms, but could not demonstrate to the court: The strategy behind choosing the keyword terms The qualifications of the persons who selected the terms That quality-assurance tests were intermittently conducted 36 12
13 Exceptions to the Attorney Client Privilege (Federal) Courts have recognized certain contexts in which the attorney-client privilege might be expected to exist but can be challenged by other means: 1. Fiduciary Exception 2. Crime or Fraud Exception 37 Fiduciary Exception Garnerdoctrine permits the piercing of the corporation s privilege for the benefit of the corporation s shareholders Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F2d1093 F.2d (5th Cir. 1970) May expand beyond the derivative capacity Securities fraud In re Diasonics Sec. Litig., 110 F.R.D. 570 (D. Colo. 1986) 38 Crime or Fraud Exception Broader reach than Garner doctrine 1. Must be an ongoing or future-contemplated action 2. If occurred, privileged, unless cover up is contemplated 3. Attorney s advice must be sought by the client to help effectuate the crime or post-commission cover-up In re Grand Jury Investigation (Schroeder), 842 F.2d 1223 (11th Cir. 1987) (exception applies even where the attorney is unaware of the client s criminal or fraudulent purpose) In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 419 F.3d 329 (5th Cir. 2005) (waiver is limited to communications and documents in furtherance of the ongoing criminal or fraudulent conduct) 39 13
14 Crime or Fraud Exception: Limitation Safe harbor provision of 18 U.S.C. 1515(c) serves as absolute bar to prosecution for obstruction of justice where attorney provided bona fide legal services in connection with or anticipation of an official proceeding. Court will examine whether attorney acted in good faith. In U.S. v. Stevens, the court granted a Rule 29 motion to acquit an inhouse attorney who was on trial for obstruction of a proceeding and concealment of documents, some of which had been withheld as privileged. A different court previously had ordered the production of the documents pursuant to the crime-fraud exception. However, the criminal court determined that the attorney had acted in the course of her bona fide legal representation of a client and in good faith reliance of both external and internal lawyers for GlaxoSmithKline. See Rule 29 Mo. Tr. 3-11, U.S. v. Stevens, No. RWT , (D. Md. May 10, 2011). 40 Exceptions to the Attorney Client Privilege (Florida) Florida (Fla. Stat (4)) recognizes the following exceptions to the Attorney-Client privilege: 1. Crime-Fraud 2. Testamentary- Caputo v. Nouskhajian, 871 So. 2d 266 ( Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (communications between decedent and his attorney concerning decedent s intent were not protected by the privilege where decedent s brother and sister were both claiming same assets) 3. Breach of Duty- limited to issue(s) of breach 4. Lawyer as Attesting Witness 5. Joint Clients 41 Discussion Questions 42 14
15 ATTORNEY AS RECIPIENT Your company is looking to expand its retail operations into a new market. The head of the business unit drafts a memorandum to the CEO outlining the benefits and risks of expanding into a new territory. You are copied on the memorandum. The memo is later sought in litigation. Is it privileged? 43 Not Privileged U.S. Postal Serv. v. Phelps Dodge Refining Corp., 852 F. Supp 156 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) No privilege for documents that were: Forwarded to in-house counsel Copied to in-house counsel Attorney s handwritten notes where no indication that legal advice was sought or given A corporation cannot be permitted to insulate its files from discovery simply by sending a CC to in-house counsel Barr Marine Products Co., Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 84 F.R.D. 631 (E.D. Pa. 1979) It would seem obvious that business communications cannot be insulated from discovery by virtue of the mention of an attorney s name, or their being directed to an attorney. 44 Attorney as Document Depository or Incidental Recipient Med. Waste Techs v. Alexian Bros. Med. Ctr., Inc., 1998 WL (N.D. Ill. June 24, 1998) One cannot merely hand over documents to an attorney and have them be protected by the attorney client privilege Leading Florida Case U.S. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 995 F. Supp (M.D. Fla. 1998) Records of interviews of employees not protected by attorney client privilege where interviews were ordered and administered by corporation s audit director and attorney was present merely to gather information 45 15
16 IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AS BUSINESS ADVISOR You are in-house counsel for a government agency that recently conducted a reduction in force (RIF). The agency is now being sued for age discrimination in connection with the RIF. You are not counsel of record. You were involved in organizing and implementing the RIF. You played a significant role in framing or communicating the RIF to employees and the public. You played a key role in the agency s preparation of RIF regulations. The plaintiff wants to depose you. The agency moves for a protective order preventing the deposition on the grounds that you are counsel for the agency and you participated in the early stages of the agency s defense of this litigation. 46 Not Privileged Evans v. Atwood, No CIV. A (RMU), 1999 WL (D.D.C. Sept. 9, 1999) According to the court in Evans v. Atwood, in-house counsel s role in the challenged RIF was so significant that his testimony was necessary to the plaintiffs case. Further, he was not counsel of record in the litigation. Acknowledging the agency s legitimate concerns about the attorney-client privilege, the court expressly reserved the agency s right to object to any questions that implicated the privilege. il In a footnote, the court indicated that communications between inhouse counsel and agency officials which are not strictly legal may not be protected by the privilege: Because an in-house lawyer often has other functions in addition to providing legal advice, the lawyer s role on a particular occasion will not be self-evident as it usually is in the case of outside counsel. 47 In-House Counsel as Business Advisor Business aspects of a decision by in-house counsel are not protected simply because legal considerations are involved Hardy v. New York News, Inc., 114 F.R.D. 633 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) 48 16
17 In-house Counsel Legal Advice is Privileged, Business Advice is Not Courts have imposed a heavy burden on corporations seeking to protect communications with persons holding dual legal and non-legal roles. In re Sealed Case, 737 F.2d 94 (D.C. Cir. 1984) Government sought testimony from in-house attorney who was also a company VP with responsibilities in addition to legal duties. Held: Company can only assert a privilege upon clear showing that advice was given in a professional legal capacity 49 In-house Counsel Legal Advice is Privileged, Business Advice is Not In re Grand Jury Proceeding, 68 F.3d 193, 196 (7th Cir. 1995) A client does not lose the privilege merely because his attorney services a dual role 50 Advice about Legal Consequences of Business Options is Generally Privileged In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Marc Rich), 731 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir. 1984) Privilege attached to legal advice concerning the mechanics and tax consequences of alternative business strategies 51 17
18 INTERNAL AUDITS You are an attorney employed by a corporation that undertook a major internal audit to review accounting performed on a large government contract knowing that issues existed concerning that accounting. The initial phase of the audit was conducted by an internal audit manager with no involvement by you. The second phase of the audit (root cause analysis) was initiated. During phase two, employee interviews were conducted and you participated in some of them. After the completion of the audit, the audit manager drafts a report and recommendation. The R&R is sent to you only. You edit and revise the R&R and use it to give oral advice to company executives. Subsequently, in litigation involving the accounting, the other side seeks to discover the employee interviews and report recommendation. Your corporation claims work product and/or subject to attorney client privilege for these attorney documents. 52 NOT PRIVILEGED/PRIVILEGED United States v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 995 F. Supp (M.D. Fla. 1998) Employee Interview: In the Lockheed Martin case, the record did not support that the attorney planned or conducted the interviews. Instead, the record established that the interviews were the corporation s effort and the attorney attended and participated in some so that she could get a better sense of the situation. The interviews were not the attorney s work product. Plus, the audit was conceived as part of Lockheed s business activity, not in anticipation of litigation. R&R Privileged: Communication between audit manager and lawyer. Purpose was to advise executives about legal issues and contained attorney s own analysis. 53 Internal Investigations Company conducts an internal investigation into allegations of improper accounting practices. The SEC and DOJ simultaneously begin investigating the same conduct, and ask for a report on the internal investigation. Company s counsel agrees to meet, but confirms that no documents will be provided. Counsel subsequently meets and discusses investigation, with an emphasis on witness interviews. Company executive is subsequently criminally charged, and subpoenas the interview memos and other documents regarding the investigation. Can he get them? 54 18
19 Maybe The good: United States v. Fago, 238 F.R.D. 3 (D.D.C. 2006) Presentation to government did not waive work product protection as to undisclosed documents. The bad: SEC v. Roberts, 254 F.R.D. 371 (N.D. Cal. 2008) Presentation to government waived attorney-client and work product privileges as to written material that was orally discussed with government. The ugly: United States v. Reyes, 239 F.R.D. 591 (N.D. Cal. 2006) Presentation to government waived attorney-client privilege as to all interview memoranda; Argument that no written materials were provided was specious because the purpose was the transmission of privileged information. 55 Some considerations Cases in the area turn on finely honed factual distinctions, and not possible to predict with certainty. If you need to present -- a just the facts presentation best limits the risk of waiver. FRE 502 provides downside protection. United States v. Treacy, No. S2 08 CR 366(JSR), 2009 WL (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2009) ( Here, Akin Gump and its client, the Special Committee, have no adversary in this action, and there is no suggestion of selective or misleading conduct. To the contrary, all of the interview memoranda that were disclosed to the Government have now been provided to defendant. Accordingly, the instant case does not present any of the unusual circumstances that would otherwise require a finding of waiver. ). 56 WHO IS THE CLIENT: THE CORPORATION OR INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES? Company hires regular counsel to conduct internal review of accounting practices in anticipation of SEC investigation, with the idea of sharing results with auditors, cooperating with regulators, and self-reporting if necessary. CFO is a part of the decision to conduct the review, and is simultaneously being represented by same counsel in an unrelated securities class action. The class action is subsequently amended to include the subject of the review. The CFO is then interviewed as a part of the review. Lawyers do not provide Upjohn warning, and there is no discussion of the civil suit. Later, lawyers advise CFO to retain independent counsel. Lawyers also disclose results of review, including communications with CFO to government. Government charges CFO. Can CFO assert the privilege? 57 19
20 No, at least on these facts United States v. Ruehle, 583 F.3d 600 (9th Cir. 2009). District court found privilege applied, and referred company s lawyers to bar. Appellate court reversed: No expectation of confidentiality. CFO was no ordinary employee. CFO was intimately involved in the review. CFO knew there would be disclosure to third parties, even if not government. 58 Practical Issue Corporate employee consults w/corporate counsel regarding the employee s own potential civil or criminal liability - What should In-house counsel do? - Who holds the privilege? 59 Practical Issue: Employee Interviews Where risk that employee has personal liability, counsel is ethically required to warn employee that corporate counsel doesn t represent employee in individual capacity BEFORE questioning by corporate counsel 60 20
21 Client- Corporation or Individual Employees? An individual s subjective belief that he was represented by corporate counsel is not sufficient to create an attorneyclient relationship and no privilege may attach In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 415 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 2005) (internal investigation-belief was not reasonable under the circumstances) U.S. v. Evans, 113 F.3d 1457 (7th Cir. 1997) (presence of third party defeats attorney-client privilege even though client may harbor desire for confidentiality) 61 Former Employees You are counsel for Initech. You have been asked to prepare Milton, a former Initech employee for his deposition in the Lumbergh/Swingline matter. During your deposition prep you discuss with Milton: 1. Your communications with Milton when he was employed by Initech regarding this matter; 2. Testimony of other witnesses in the Lumbergh/Swingline matter. During the deposition, apposing counsel asks Milton about predeposition communication with you. You object on the basis of privilege. Later, after a break, opposing counsel asks Milton about any discussions with you during the break. Milton tells opposing counsel you are acting as his attorney for this deposition and case. You object on the basis of client privilege. 62 Probably Not Privileged 1. Privileged information obtained by the former employee while employed by the Company (including information conveyed by counsel during that period) remains privileged. Peralta v. Cendant Corp., 190 F.R.D. 38 (D. Conn. 1999) But Refused to extend privilege to deposition prep. If conversation went beyond employee s activities within the course of her employment And Discussion during a break as to how a question should be handled... not shown to be entitled to any privilege. Also No privilege for pre-deposition communications despite claim that company counsel was acting as her attorney. Wade Williams Distribution, Inc. v. American Broadcasting, No. 00 Civ. 5002(LMM), 2004 WL (S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2004) (The mere volunteered representation by corporate counsel of a former employee should not be allowed to shield information which there is no independent basis for checking within the attorney-client privilege. ) 63 21
22 Practical Suggestions 64 Practical Suggestions for In-House Counsel to Protect the Privilege A. Label Written Materials Legal communications between employees and in-house counsel should be labeled as privileged and confidential In-house counsel should assume the primary responsibility for the maintenance of documents regarding privileged communications 65 Practical Suggestions for In-House Counsel to Protect the Privilege B. Legal Advice Corporation should seek advice from in-house counsel that has legal ramifications In-house counsel should avoid handling matters that are usually the responsibility of business executives Communicate business and legal advice in separate documents 66 22
23 Practical Suggestions for In-House Counsel to Protect the Privilege C. Corporate Meetings Prior to meetings, in-house counsel should be advised about the topics to be discussed In-house counsel can alert corporate representatives that some communications may not be protected Keep detailed records of the meetings Assist in determining which communications involved legal services and should be protected 67 Practical Suggestions for In-House Counsel to Protect the Privilege D. Internal Investigations Hire outside counsel Avoids bias against in-house counsel by courts If in-house counsel investigates: interview employees within the control group and solicit information to be volunteered by other employees If you want to use the investigation defensively, be prepared to waive. 68 Practical Suggestions for In-House Counsel to Protect the Privilege E. Avoiding Inadvertent Disclosures When Using a Document Management System During Discovery When developing a data-base search, make sure to keep a record of how and why the search was developed Make sure the persons developing and conducting the search are qualified to do so Conduct intermittent quality assurance tests periodically take a sampling of documents and manually review for privileged documents 69 23
24 DISCOVERY ISSUES 70 Social Media Discovery Stored Communications Act specifically prohibits electronic communication providers from disclosing the contents of electronically stored communications or identity of subscribers Rule 45 subpoenas not an exception Rule 34 production requests may provide some help, but relevancy rules apply 71 PED Discovery Federal and state discovery rules are potentially behind the developing technology Rapidly changing technology potentially becoming an increasingly important source of evidence in criminal and civil cases 72 24
25 PED Discovery PED data is easily overlooked PED data more vulnerable to damage or destruction than conventional ESI data Volatile memory makes continued existence of PED data less certain than conventional computer data 73 PED Discovery To the extent that data like IM is retained in the ordinary course of business, IM may, like , constitute ESI and may be discoverable 74 PED Discovery Important to become educated about clients (both internal and external) uses of PED s who has them how they are used what may be stored on them whether data is backed up where it can be retrieved, etc
26 Approaches to Preserving PED Information Freezing the device Cloning the device Forensic acquisition and preservation of PED data 76 Approaches to Producing PED Information Forensic PED expert Manual acquisition Direct review 77 QUESTIONS 78 26
The attorney-client privilege
BY TIMOTHY J. MILLER AND ANDREW P. SHELBY TIMOTHY J. MILLER is partner and general counsel at Novack and Macey LLP. As co-chair of the firm s legal malpractice defense group, he represents law firms and
More informationCurrent Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions:
Current Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions: The Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Protection, and Rules of Professional Conduct 1.6 & 2.3 Presenters: John K. Villa & Charles Davant Williams &
More informationSoup to Nuts: the Inception and Destruction of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Protections
Soup to Nuts: the Inception and Destruction of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Protections Hennepin County Bar Association Professionalism and Ethics Section April 10, 2015 George
More informationPRESERVING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS. Chief Counsel, Investigations
PRESERVING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS Eric J. Gorman Partner Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Lawrence Oliver,
More informationThe Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel. The Attorney-Client Privilege
The Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel Labor & Employment Law Seminar June 9, 2011 Linda Walton Chelsea Dwyer Petersen The Attorney-Client Privilege
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION THE JOHN ERNST LUCKEN REVOCABLE TRUST, and JOHN LUCKEN and MARY LUCKEN, Trustees, Plaintiffs, No. 16-CV-4005-MWB vs.
More informationAttorney-Client Privilege for the Compliance Officer:
Attorney-Client Privilege for the Compliance Officer: Who has it? When do you have it? How do you keep it? April 22, 2014 Marsha Gerber (Moderator) Partner Norton Rose Fulbright (713) 651-5296 Marsha.gerber@nortonrosefulbright.com
More informationCase 2:13-cv MMB Document 173 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:13-cv-05101-MMB Document 173 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TALBOT TODD SMITH CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 13-5101 UNILIFE CORPORATION,
More informationCase 1:17-mc DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:17-mc-00105-DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 20 Case 1:17-mc-00105-DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 2 of 20 but also DENIES Jones Day s Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. Applicants may
More informationCase 1:14-cv FB-RLM Document 492 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13817
Case 1:14-cv-04717-FB-RLM Document 492 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13817 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationWHAT S HAPPENING TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE?
WHAT S HAPPENING TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE? PROPOSED FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502 THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE PROTECTION ACT OF 2007 THE MCNULTY MEMORANDUM DABNEY CARR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION
Kenny v. Pacific Investment Management Company LLC et al Doc. 0 1 1 ROBERT KENNY, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; PIMCO INVESTMENTS LLC, Defendants.
More informationBackground The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure adopted in 1938 encouraged full pre-trial disclosure (ream or reams of paper). Present day litigation
EVIDENCE AND DISCOVERY UPDATE Alistair B. Dawson 1 Background The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure adopted in 1938 encouraged full pre-trial disclosure (ream or reams of paper). Present day litigation
More informationPeterson v. Bernardi. District of New Jersey Civil No RMB-JS (July 24, 2009)
Peterson v. Bernardi District of New Jersey Civil No. 07-2723-RMB-JS (July 24, 2009) Opinion And Order Joel Schneider, United States Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Motion
More informationINVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS
INVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS Wes Bearden, CEO Attorney & Licensed Investigator Bearden Investigative Agency, Inc. www.beardeninvestigations.com PRIVILEGE KEY POINTS WE ALL KNOW
More informationDISCOVERY IN DECLINED QUI TAM CASES
DISCOVERY IN DECLINED QUI TAM CASES Federal Bar Association s 2018 Qui Tam Conference February 28, 2018 Susan S. Gouinlock, Esq. Wilbanks and Gouinlock, LLP Jennifer Verkamp, Esq. Morgan Verkamp Sara Kay
More informationPreparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness
Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness Presented by Sam Ramer (Counsel and VP, Government Relations, Symplicity Corporation), Leslie B. Kiernan (Partner, Akin Gump), Kristine L. Sendek-Smith (Partner,
More informationResponding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP Today s Agenda Corporate Criminal Liability Enforcement Environment General
More informationPrivileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide
Privileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide William M. Bosch, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Thomas C. Indelicarto, VeriSign Inc. Robert N. Weiner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer January 11, 2017 apks.com
More informationPRIVILEGE IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS. ABA MIDYEAR CONFERENCE February 3, 2012
PRIVILEGE IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS ABA MIDYEAR CONFERENCE February 3, 2012 Mor Wetzler Jena A. Sold Paul Hastings LLP New York, NY Copyright 2012. All rights reserved. LEGAL_US_E # 96047971.2
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., and TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 14 C 206 ATTURO TIRE CORP., and SVIZZ-ONE Judge
More informationAttorney Work-Product in the United States:
Attorney Work-Product in the United States: What Swiss lawyers need to know Jim Nickovich, Counsel (U.S. Attorney at Law), VISCHER AG BSW Online Marketing und Recht 1 U.S. doctrines matter to Swiss Counsel
More informationCase 0:15-cv BB Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2016 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:15-cv-61536-BB Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2016 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-CIV-61536-BLOOM/VALLE KEISHA HALL, v. Plaintiff, TEVA
More informationCase 2:17-cv JTM-JVM Document 62 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * *
Case 2:17-cv-04812-JTM-JVM Document 62 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BRIAN O MALLEY VERSUS PUBLIC BELT RAILROAD COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION FACTUAL BACKGROUND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Case No. 3:08 CV 1855 -vs- Thomas S. Zaremba, Appellant, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationMany Hats, One Set of Rules: Ethical Beartraps for In-House Counsel
Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients 777 E. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee,WI 53202 414.271.2400 Many Hats, One
More informationDavid J. Bright MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES
MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES David J. Bright Direct Number: (515) 286-7015 Facsimile: (515) 286-7050 E-Mail: djbright@nyemaster.com
More informationWhat Keeps You Up at Night?
What Keeps You Up at Night? Issues of Fraud and Abuse Compliance Series Keeping In House Out of the Doghouse Invoking the Attorney- Client Privilege 37 Offices in 18 Countries 2 Keeping In House Out of
More informationBenefits And Dangers Of An SEC Wells Submission
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Benefits And Dangers Of An SEC Wells Submission
More informationCase 8:12-cv JDW-EAJ Document 112 Filed 10/25/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2875 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:12-cv-00557-JDW-EAJ Document 112 Filed 10/25/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2875 BURTON W. WIAND, as Court-Appointed Receiver for Scoop Real Estate, L.P., et al. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE
More informationEthical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel
Ethical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel 2017 ACC Fall Symposium October 6, 2017 Today s Presenter(s): Lynn W. Hartman Member Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman, PLC Phone: 319-896-4083 Email: lhartman@spmblaw.com
More informationEthical Issues in Representing or Litigating Against Organizations. Dennis P. Duffy 2016
Ethical Issues in Representing or Litigating Against Organizations Dennis P. Duffy 2016 Ex Parte Communications Communication with Class/Collective Action Members Contact with class members in EEOC action
More informationManaging a Corporate Crisis:
Managing a Corporate Crisis: Strategies for Containing a Crisis and Controlling the Public Narrative While Meeting Ethical Obligations and Maintaining Privilege June 15, 2017 Vincent Cohen Hector Gonzalez
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 17-cv-00087 (CRC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION New York
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Case No. 11-15719 ) CARDINAL FASTENER & SPECIALTY ) Chapter 7 CO., INC., ) ) Chief Judge Pat E. Morgenstern-Clarren Debtor.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 0 1 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney KENDALL J. NEWMAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 01 I Street, Suite -0 Sacramento, CA 1 Telephone: ( -1 GREGORY G. KATSAS Acting Assistant Attorney General
More informationWhen Does a Limited Waiver of the Attorney- Client Privilege Occur?
Boston College Law Review Volume 24 Issue 5 Number 5 Article 3 9-1-1983 When Does a Limited Waiver of the Attorney- Client Privilege Occur? Nancy Mayer Hughes Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr
More informationINTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP I. The use of internal investigations has increased significantly. Based on
More informationCase 3:16-cv JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Case 3:16-cv-00054-JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SUPREME FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL KENNEDY and FERRELL WELCH,
More informationPreserving The Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection
Preserving The Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection June K. Ghezzi Jones Day Mark P. Rotatori Jones Day September 2006 Jones Day publications should not be construed as legal advice on
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2009
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2009 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, WARNER, J. v. PATRICIA JACOBSON, Respondent. No. 4D09-683
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
E-FILED 2014 JAN 02 736 PM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY BELLE OF SIOUX CITY, L.P., v. Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant MISSOURI RIVER HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT,
More informationEthical Limits in Witness Preparation. Susan J. Kohlmann February 24, 2017
Ethical Limits in Witness Preparation Susan J. Kohlmann February 24, 2017 Ethical limits in Witness Preparation The line between permissible conduct and impermissible coaching is like the difference between
More informationImpact of DOJ's Corporate Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Strategies On Providers and Defense Counsel
Impact of DOJ's Corporate Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Strategies On Providers and Defense Counsel David Douglass Partner, Sheppard Mullin William Pericak Partner, Jenner & Block LLP Leo Reichert Exec.
More informationPresenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A In House Counsel Depositions: Navigating Complex Legal and Ethical Issues Responding to Deposition Notices and Subpoenas and Protecting Privileged
More informationEthics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations. October 5, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Ethics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations October 5, 2017 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ETHICS: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, THE WORK-PRODUCT DOCTRINE,
More informationBest Practices For NC In House Counsel To Avoid Being Deposed
womblebonddickinson.com Best Practices For NC In House Counsel To Avoid Being Deposed Presentation to the Charlotte Chapter of the ACC November 1, 2017 Attorney Work Product United Phosphorus, Ltd.
More informationCase 1:17-cv JAL Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2017 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:17-cv-20301-JAL Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 17-cv-20301-LENARD/GOODMAN UNITED STATES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 6:09-cv-06019-CJS-JWF Document 48 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JULIE ANGELONE, XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff(s), DECISION AND ORDER v. 09-CV-6019
More informationIN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES. B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012
IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012 Objective The goal of the company is to take maximum advantage of the attorneyclient privilege and related
More informationThird-Party Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver Exceptions: Kovel, Common Interest and Functional Equivalent Doctrines
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Third-Party Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver Exceptions: Kovel, Common Interest and Functional Equivalent Doctrines WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2017
More informationCrafting the Winning Argument in Spoliation Cases: And the Dog Ate Our Documents Isn t It
Crafting the Winning Argument in Spoliation Cases: And the Dog Ate Our Documents Isn t It Janelle L. Davis Thompson & Knight LLP 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-1677 Janelle.Davis@tklaw.com
More informationATTORNEY-CLIENT MAY 25, 2011 JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ.
THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE MAY 25, 2011 MCLE JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE PURPOSE FOR THE PRIVILEGE 3 II. WHAT IS PROTECTED 3 III. WAIVER OF THE PRIVILEGE 3 IV. WHEN A CORPORATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Weber, J. Bowman, M.J. vs. ORDER
Pastura v. CVS Caremark Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION FRANK PASTURA, Case No.: 1:11-cv-400 Plaintiff, Weber, J. Bowman, M.J. vs. CVS CAREMARK, Defendants.
More informationPrivilege United States. F Joseph Warin, Daniel P Chung and Audi Syarief Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Privilege United States F Joseph Warin, Daniel P Chung and Audi Syarief Published November 2016 Privilege United States F Joseph Warin, Daniel P Chung and Audi Syarief Scope of the privilege 1 Are communications
More informationELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Practices & Checklist
ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Practices & Checklist Bradley J. Gross, Esq. * Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. 3111 Stirling Road Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312 (954) 364-6044 BGross@Becker-Poliakoff.com * Chair, e-business
More informationTOP TEN PITFALLS ENCOUNTERED IN INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS. March 2008
TOP TEN PITFALLS ENCOUNTERED IN INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS Tom Dillard, Esq., Ritchie, Dillard & Davies, P.C. Anthony Lake, Esq., Gillen Withers & Lake, LLC Joseph P. Griffith, Jr., Esq., Joe Griffith Law
More informationPrompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege
Prompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege by Monica L. Goebel and John B. Nickerson Workplace Harassment In order to avoid liability for workplace harassment, an employer must show that it exercised
More informationEthical Issues Arising in Alternative Dispute Resolution
Ethical Issues Arising in Alternative Dispute Resolution Maxine Aaronson Attorney at Law Dallas, TX David A. Conrad Office of Chief Counsel Denver, CO Paul L.B. McKenney Varnum LLP Novi, MI Hon. Peter
More informationCase 3:06-cv FLW-JJH Document 31 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:06-cv-02304-FLW-JJH Document 31 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY V. MANE FILS S.A., : Civil Action No. 06-2304 (FLW) : Plaintiff, : : v. : : M E
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 189 Filed: 11/09/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:2937
Case: 1:10-cv-02348 Document #: 189 Filed: 11/09/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:2937 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORI WIGOD; DAN FINLINSON; and SANDRA
More information231 F.R.D. 343 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
231 F.R.D. 343 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. 1 Definition No. 5 provides that identify when used in regard to a communication includes providing the substance of the communication.
More informationEthical Considerations on Social Media EVIDENTIARY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO BUILD OR DEFEND A CASE.
Ethical Considerations on Social Media EVIDENTIARY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO BUILD OR DEFEND A CASE. Florida Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4-3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party
More informationAMENDED RULE 26 EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
CONSTRUCTION H. JAMES WULFSBERG, ESQ. Wulfsberg Reese Colvig & Fristman Professional Corporation DAVID J. HYNDMAN, ESQ. Wulfsberg Reese Colvig & Fristman Professional Corporation navigant.com About Navigant
More informationETHICS TOOLKIT FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL MANAGING LITIGATION APRIL 3, 2014
ETHICS TOOLKIT FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL MANAGING LITIGATION APRIL 3, 2014 Kenneth L. Racowski Chair, Philadelphia Commercial Litigation Wilson Elser LLP Daniel E. McGuire Commercial & Employment Litigation
More informationProtecting the Privilege When the Government Executes a Search Warrant
Protecting the Privilege When the Government Executes a Search Warrant By Sara Kropf, Law Office of Sara Kropf PLLC Government investigative techniques traditionally reserved for street crime cases search
More informationExcerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery
Excerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery 1. Excerpt from Volume 1, Pretrial, of NC Defender Manual: Discusses procedures for obtaining records from third parties and rules governing subpoenas
More informationIn the Wake of Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, Where Are the Districts Headed on Class Certification?
In the Wake of Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, Where Are the Districts Headed on Class Certification? by Paul M. Smith Last Term s Wal-Mart decision of the Supreme Court had two basic holdings about why the
More informationLegal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data
Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data Peter L. Ostermiller Attorney at Law 239 South Fifth Street Suite 1800 Louisville, KY 40202 peterlo@ploesq.com www.ploesq.com Overview What is Metadata?
More informationFour False Claims Act Rulings That Deter Meritless FCA Actions
Four False Claims Act Rulings That Deter Meritless FCA Actions False Claims Act Alert November 3, 2011 Health industry practice lawyers from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP have represented clients
More informationTEACHING YOUR TEAM HOW ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND DOCUMENT DISCOVERY WORKS (AND DOESN'T) BEFORE THE LAWSUITS OR INVESTIGATIONS START
Dan Conley QUARLES & BRADY LLP 411 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 Phone: (414) 277-5609 daniel.conley@quarles.com Nicole Stanton QUARLES & BRADY LLP Two North Central Ave Phoenix, AZ 85004 Phone:
More informationDartmouth College. North Branch Construction, Inc. & Lavalle/Brensinger, P.A. AND. North Branch Construction, Inc.
MERRIMACK, SS SUPERIOR COURT Dartmouth College v. North Branch Construction, Inc. & Lavalle/Brensinger, P.A. AND North Branch Construction, Inc. v. Building Envelope Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Foam Tech NO.
More informationI. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff, AAIpharma, Inc., (hereinafter AAIpharma ), brought suit against defendants,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK < AAIPHARMA INC., : : Plaintiff, : MEMORANDUM : OPINION & ORDER - against - : : 02 Civ. 9628 (BSJ) (RLE) KREMERS URBAN DEVELOPMENT CO., et al.,
More informationDocument Analysis Technology Group (DATG) and Records Management Alert
February 2007 Authors: Carolyn M. Branthoover +1.412.355.5902 carolyn.branthoover@klgates.com Karen I. Marryshow +1.412.355.6379 karen.marryshow@klgates.com K&L Gates comprises approximately 1,400 lawyers
More informationDISCOVERY OF COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE EXPERT WITNESS
DISCOVERY OF COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE EXPERT WITNESS Written by: J. SCOTT TARBUTTON, ESQUIRE COZEN O CONNOR 1900 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Ph: (215) 665-2000 Fax: (215) 665-2013 starbutton@cozen.com
More informationIn this securities class action suit filed against. Lockheed Martin Corporation and three Lockheed executives, the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------- x CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MEMORANDUM ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 15-525-SLR/SRF ALCON LABORATORIES, INC. and ALCON RESEARCH, LTD., Defendants. MEMORANDUM
More informationOFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney LINDA M. ROSS General Counsel, Mayor's Office DIRECT DIAL: (415) 554-4724 E-MAIL: linda.ross@sfgov.org MEMORANDUM FROM: Linda M. Ross General Counsel, Mayor's Office Question
More informationPRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
PRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS March 27, 2015 ISBA Government Practice Seminar Timothy J. Hill Copyright 2014 Bradley & Riley PC - All rights reserved. Privileges and Ethical Considerations 1. Attorney-Client
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DISTRICT
Case: 1:09-cv-03039 Document #: 94 Filed: 04/01/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:953 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DISTRICT SARA LEE CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationediscovery Demystified
ediscovery Demystified Presented by: Robin E. Stewart Of Counsel Kansas City Robin.Stewart@KutakRock.com (816) 960-0090 Why Kutak Rock s ediscovery Practice Exists Every case, regardless of size, has an
More informationPierce County Ethics Commission Administrative Procedures (Promulgated pursuant to Pierce County Code Ch. 3.12) Revised December 13, 2017
(Promulgated pursuant to Pierce County Code Ch. 3.12) Revised December 13, 2017 I. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES 1.1 Description of Organization The Pierce County Ethics Commission ("Commission") was established
More informationCase 2:16-cv CB Document 103 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-00538-CB Document 103 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Mass Litigation May 29-31, 2008 Charleston, South Carolina. Materials on Electronic Discovery
359 ALI-ABA Course of Study Mass Litigation May 29-31, 2008 Charleston, South Carolina Materials on Electronic Discovery By Shira A. Scheindlin Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse New York, New York
More informationDEALING WITH VIOLATIONS IN EXPORT AND IMPORT TRANSACTIONS
1 DEALING WITH VIOLATIONS IN EXPORT AND IMPORT TRANSACTIONS 2017 Part I WILLIAMSMULLEN.COM DEALING WITH VIOLATIONS IN EXPORT AND IMPORT TRANSACTIONS Part I Thomas B. McVey 1 April 14, 2017 You are the
More informationPreparing Your Employees to be Witnesses in Civil Cases
Preparing Your Employees to be Witnesses in Civil Cases ACC West Central Florida Chapter Corporate Counsel Symposium Longboat Key Club August 19, 2011 Presented by Fowler White Boggs P.A. Bob Olsen, Tampa
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 138 Filed: 03/31/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:2059
Case: 1:13-cv-01418 Document #: 138 Filed: 03/31/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:2059 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LISLEWOOD CORPORATION, v. AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE ) SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) Case No. 07-MD-1840-KHV This Order Relates to All Cases ) ORDER Currently
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION
Case 1:10-cv-00037-JPJ-PMS Document 379 Filed 05/31/12 Page 1 of 11 Pageid#: 4049 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION ROBERT ADAIR, etc., ) Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. ) PUBLIC In the Matter of ) ) INTEL CORPORATION, ) Docket No ) Respondent.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) PUBLIC In the Matter of ) ) INTEL CORPORATION, ) Docket No. 9341 ) Respondent. ) ) COMPLAINT COUNSEL S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT REQUEST
More informationFiling an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12
ADVISORY LITIGATION PRIVATE EQUITY CONVERGENT Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12 Michael Stegawski michael@cla-law.com 800.750.9861 x101 This memorandum is provided for
More informationIn-House Ethics: Important Questions. Dorsey & Whitney. Dorsey & Whitney LLP. All Rights Reserved.
In-House Ethics: Important Questions Ella Solomons Deloitte Kenneth L. Jorgensen David C. Singer Dorsey & Whitney Overall Responsibility A law firm... shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that all lawyers
More informationExpert Discovery: Does a Testifying Expert s Consideration of Attorney Work Product Vitiate the Attorney Work-Product Privilege?
Expert Discovery: Does a Testifying Expert s Consideration of Attorney Work Product Vitiate the Attorney Work-Product Privilege? 21 by Daniel L. Russo, Jr. and Robert Iscaro As high-stakes, complex litigation
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-64
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2009 FLORIDA EYE CLINIC, P.A., Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D09-64 MARY T. GMACH, Respondent. / Opinion filed May 29, 2009.
More informationThe 2010 Amendments to the Expert Discovery Provisions of Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Brief Reminder
ABA Section of Litigation 2012 Section Annual Conference April 18 20, 2012: Deposition Practice in Complex Cases: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly The to the Expert Discovery Provisions of Rule 26 of the
More informationCase 3:12-cv L Document 201 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 4769
Case 3:12-cv-00853-L Document 201 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 4769 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MANUFACTURERS COLLECTION COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff,
More informationETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL
ETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL GUEST SPEAKERS SARAH MENENDEZ Senior Litigation Counsel T +1.713.918.1039 sarah_menendez@bmc.com SEAN GORMAN Trial Partner T +1.713.221.1221 sean.gorman@bracewell.com
More informationCommittee Opinion July 22, 1998 THROUGH A TEMPORARY PLACEMENT SERVICE.
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1712 TEMPORARY LAWYERS WORKING THROUGH A TEMPORARY PLACEMENT SERVICE. You have presented a hypothetical situation in which a staffing agency recruits, screens and interviews lawyers
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 155 Filed: 06/30/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:5078
Case: 1:16-cv-05486 Document #: 155 Filed: 06/30/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:5078 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION VIAMEDIA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.
More informationComments on the Council's Proposed Adaptation offre 502
REPORT OF THE COMMERCIAL AND FEDERAL LITIGATION SECTION REGARDING THE NEW YORK STATE-FEDERAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL'S "REPORT ON THE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN FEDERAL AND NEW YORK STATE WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT
More information