PRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
- Jacob Rice
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS March 27, 2015 ISBA Government Practice Seminar Timothy J. Hill Copyright 2014 Bradley & Riley PC - All rights reserved.
2 Privileges and Ethical Considerations 1. Attorney-Client Privilege Recent Issues 2. Confidences When Claims by Counsel 3. When Elevator Talk = Conflict / DQ 4. Litigating in the Court of Public Opinion 5. Iowa Ethics Opinions (Most Recent)
3 Attorney-Client Privilege Review Limits of attorney-client and work product doctrines in internal investigations Attorney-client privilege: Iowa Code Control Group test extends to those in control Rejected by Upjohn v. US (S. Ct. 1981) Iowa Supreme Court, in Keefe v. Bernard et al., 774 N.W.2d 663 (Iowa 2009) adopted subject matter test
4 Attorney-Client Privilege Review Subject Matter test: If employee discusses her own actions relating to potential liability of corp. (with in-house counsel), then those protected Employee to in-house re: legal advice on behalf of corp. = protected If employee is interviewed as witness to actions of others, then communication not protected A-C. Facts and circumstances analysis need to be clear.
5 Work Product Doctrine Review Work-product privilege Iowa R. Civ. P (3) Protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial By or for party or party s representative Attorney, consultant, insurer, agent
6 Internal Fraud Investigation Issue: motion to compel documents re: internal code of business conduct (COBC) investigation Investigation conducted by non-lawyers, reported to corp. s lawyers after investigation concluded Question: protected by A-C, WP?
7 Protecting A-C and WP in Internal Investigation Motion to compel granted, internal investigation documents not protected A-C, WP. United State ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co., 2014 WL (D.D.C. 3/6/14) Investigation conducted by corp. non-lawyers, per COBC, before (and without) involvement of legal dept. Cf., Upjohn (protected investigation done aft. consult with legal dept. and outside counsel)
8 Protecting A-C and WP in Internal Investigation Also, no WP protection Use of non-lawyers made it hard to argue documents were prepared in anticipation of litigation Investigation conducted Complaint not filed until 2009
9 But DC Circuit Reverses 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. 6/27/14) (rehearing en banc denied 9/2/14) KRB s privilege assertion indistinguishable from Upjohn (S. Ct. 1981) (1) Fact that corp. s consultation of only in-house counsel (not outside, as in Upjohn) of no moment in-house does not dilute privilege (2) non-lawyers conducting interviews at direction of counsel does not dilute privilege
10 DC Circuit Reverses, Upholds Privilege (3) Upjohn does not require magic words when informing employees they are assisting counsel in legal investigation (4) Re: COBC investigation (not seeking legal advice) DC Cir.: if obtaining legal advice one of the significant purposes of communication, then privileges apply -- even if other purposes were regulation compliance (requiring investigation)
11 On Remand from DC Circuit: Shut Up Already! 2014 WL (D.D.C. Nov. 20, 2014) KRB s repeated assertions that internal investigation yielded no evidence of fraud waived privilege R. 30(b)(6) deposition of KRB rep. instructed not to answer about investigation But on re-direct, KRB counsel elicited testimony that if fraud had been found, in normal course this would have triggered reporting (repeatedly said investigation yielded nothing) Court: this placed reports at issue fairness requires production
12 Barko In Practice Chevron Midstream Pipelines v. Settoon Towing, 2015 WL (E.D. La. Jan. 5, 2015): Chevron in-house attorneys initiated legally chartered root cause investigation Court rejects work product protection: Chevron engineer testified Chevron ordinarily conducts root cause investigations, to prevent similar accident in future To protect this, Company must demonstrate its investigation was different from ordinary demonstrate prepared in anticipation to litigation
13 Barko In Practice Renton v. Kone, Inc., 2014 WL (Conn. S. Ct. Sept. 26, 2014) General Counsel directs Compliance Director to conduct internal investigation, re: improper HR practices Employees file bill of discovery, seeking production of investigation report Court: citing KRB (DC Cir. 2014), ruled in favor of internal investigations led by Company attorneys
14 Barko In Practice In re General Motors Ignition Switch, 2015 WL (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2015): GM outside counsel conduct 350 interviews of 200 current and former employees Court: both A-C and WP apply to protect from disclosing: Interviews conducted in light of GM s request for legal advice; Outside counsel started each interview stating purpose of interview was to assist with providing GM with legal advice; and Interview materials shared only with GM, its outside counsel
15 Best Practices: Protecting A-C and WP in Internal Investigation COBC investigations, other internal investigations use in-house and outside counsel as early as possible Use Upjohn letters formally document initiation of internal investigation legal advice for the corp. Give Upjohn warning to employees interviewed investigation done per corp. legal, for corp. Mark documents A-C, WP Involve outside legal where feasible in-house sometimes perform tasks in business capacity
16 Protecting A-C and WP in Internal Investigation Issue: same facts (and follow best practices above) but instead of non-lawyer employees, corp. uses outside consultants Company shares confidential information with outside consultants Such as public relations firm, re: Penn State scandal Question: A-C, WP waiver?
17 Answer: it depends Protecting A-C and WP in Internal Investigation In re Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation (D.N.J. 2003) communications with PR, marketing firms were not privileged, because not hired for litigation purposes But see In re Bieter (8 th Cir. 1994) inappropriate to distinguish between those on client s payroll and those who are instead, and for whatever reason, employed as independent contractors. Functional Equivalent test
18 Protecting A-C and WP in Internal Investigation Best Practices: When using consultants, use confidentiality and retention agreements Limit disclosure of communications to between consultant and corporate counsel Define which employees of consulting firm have access to confidential info Consultant must agree decision to waive/disclose rests with company The more exclusive relationship the consultant has, the more authority she has to make key corp. decisions -- the better Self-critical analysis privilege apply?
19 Inadvertent Waiver Responding to Public Records Request Ardon v. City of Los Angeles, 181 Cal. Rptr. 3d 324 (Cal. App. 2014) Public records request to City, per statute, re: potentially contaminated site (the subject of lawsuit; City not a party) City produced privileged documents PL counsel notified City, refused to return privileged docs Court: unlike litigation discovery, public entity waives privilege if it discloses pursuant to public records request Doesn t matter if discloser was low level employee who did not have authorization from City Counsel or City Attorney
20 Corp. Confidences When Claims by In-house Counsel Facts: Former in-house counsel, acting as relator in qui tam action under Fed. False Claims Act Gone from corp. for 5+ years before suit Discloses confidential corp. info his corp. provided below-cost services to health care providers to induce referrals of gov t-paid services Question: duty of confidentiality v. encouraging whistleblowing?
21 Corp. Confidences When Claims by In-house Counsel Held: violation of Rule 1.9(c) of Rules of Prof. Conduct by using confidential client information against former company Fair Laboratory Practices v. Quest Diagnostics Incorp., 734 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2013) Court: False Claim Act does not authorize person to violate state laws in order to assert claim Take-away: if attorney had issue, should have first gone to board to stop fraud; if board does not act, then o.k. to disclose.
22 Claims by In-House Lawyers Issue: when can in-house attorney, as Pl. in wrongful discharge action, disclose client (employer) confidences? Iowa Rule 1.6(b)(5) lawyer shall not reveal client confidences, except to establish a claim or defense for lawyer in lawyer-client dispute So here, in-house can offensively use client confidences to establish claim against client
23 Claims by In-House Lawyers But see D.C. Rules and Ethics Committee: Rule 1.6(e)(3): D.C. Bar members may only reveal client confidences and secrets as a defense to an employer claim, not offensively to establish a claim Ethics Committee: in-house lawyer can t use when filing claim, but can if employer puts confidences at issue, such as with affirmative defense or counterclaim
24 Claims by In-House Lawyers D.C. Ethics Cmt.: lawyer knowing confidences might be put at issue does not preclude asserting claim Assoc. Corp. Counsel Legal Strategist: difficult to navigate, as chief desire is to protect client confidence Strategy for Employer: Check ethics rules in this situation Determine if you can protect confidential info, by not putting at issue
25 When Elevator Talk = Conflict/DQ Issue: when does consulting attorney s informal chat with another lawyer, not associated to matter, become an ethical violation and/or DQ event? In Re Liebnow v. Boston Enterprises, 2013 WL (Colo. 2013): CO S. Ct. affirms lower court s order disqualifying Pl. s pro hac vice motion, where Def. counsel previously consulted out-of-state counsel at same firm, on same case
26 When Elevator Talk = Conflict/DQ Facts -- Pl. child, ill from E. coli in salad, sues Def. CO Def. counsel called Seattle lawyer in small firm specializing in food-borne illnesses Had one call, several s Def. counsel did not ask consulted lawyer to keep confidential Def. counsel had no bad intent not done to DQ Discussed case theories, trial expert, adding another Def. Months later, Pl. counsel tries to add another from same Seattle firm to case (potential conflict imputed)
27 When Elevator Talk = Conflict/DQ CO S. Ct. Ruling: Abuse of discretion standard of review (had lower court allowed, unclear if there would have been reversal) Consulted lawyer subject to DQ (unclear if consulting attorney subject to ethics violation) Rule 1.7(a)(2) conflict of interest = risk that representation of one client (Pl.) here limited by lawyer s responsibility to... a third person (Def., from the consultation)
28 When Elevator Talk = Conflict/DQ Dissent: majority deprived Pl. child of fundamental tenet of choice of counsel And, elevator talk, vital to profession, won t happen Best Practices: Use hypothetical Do not disclose privileged, confidential information Consulted attorney should ask if confidential Ask for waiver of confidentiality and right to DQ (?)
29 Litigating in Court of Public Opinion Constitution protects right of lawyer to speak in defense of clients, and right of public to learn about case But, Rule of Prof. Conduct 3.6 sets limits: Lawyer in matter shall not make extrajudicial statement that lawyer knows/should know will be publicly distributed and is likely to prejudice the proceeding
30 Litigating in Court of Public Opinion Criminal trials most sensitive Civil jury trials also sensitive Non-jury, arbitration proceedings less so Standard may govern distribution of court pleadings, transcripts without comment (PA Op ) Especially if information is likely inadmissible
31 Litigating in Court of Public Opinion Timing of disclosure a factor eve of trial disclosure more likely to prejudice proceeding For sanctions, proof of actual prejudice not required (just likelihood ) Applies only to lawyers participating or has participated in proceeding APPLY TO GC? Does not apply to clients (but GC subject to R. Prof. Conduct) Rule 3.6(d) applies to lawyers associated in firm handling matter
32 Litigating in Court of Public Opinion Protected Conduct: Does not apply to in-court statements Except where confidential (settlement, court order), can state claim, defense involved, ID people Information contained in public record (court-filings) Scheduling or result of any step of litigation My practice, without comment But see protective orders, must be admissible
33 Litigating in Court of Public Opinion Rule 8.2 Limits Criticism of Judges Lawyer shall not make statement she knows is false or with reckless disregard to the truth/falsity concerning qualifications, integrity of judge Applies to public and private (letter to opposing counsel) comments Applies even where lawyer acting as private citizen Does not apply to true statements or statements of opinion (narrowly construed to judicial elections)
34 Iowa Ethics Opinion (October 2014) Issue: propriety of calling opposing counsel s conduct unethical? Rule 32:8.3 mandates reporting unethical conduct Rule (c): professional misconduct to engage in misrepresentation ABA Formal Op : despite the absence (in R. Prof. Conduct) of an express prohibition on the subject[, s]uch a threat may not be used as a bargaining point...
35 Iowa Ethics Opinion (October 2014) If warning issued as threat or to coerce, it violates Iowa S. Ct. Rule 33.1(1): lawyers conduct should be characterized... by personal courtesy and professional integrity. Violates Iowa S. Ct. Rule 33.1(3): uncivil conduct delays and denies justice. Bottom-line: wrongfully accusing fellow lawyer of unethical conduct = antithesis of professionalism
36 Iowa Ethics Opinion (January 2015) Issue: lawyer communicating with client via Warn client about risk of sending, receiving using device which a 3d party may access (i.e., employer access to employee accounts); Lawyer responsibility to first consider whether, given client s situation, there is a significant risk that third parties will have access; If so, then lawyer must use reasonable care to protect confidentiality of communications
37 Iowa Ethics Opinion (January 2015) Issue: interception of confidential or attorneyclient communication Starting point assume lawyer was not involved in interception of communication (as this would violate Rule 32:1.2(d) (lawyer shall not counsel client to engage in criminal, fraudulent activity) Rule 32:4.4(b): lawyer who receives document relating to representation of another lawyer s client and knows document inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender.
38 Iowa Ethics Opinion Reliance on Iowa R. Civ. P (5)(d) additional requirement after being notified of inadvertent production, recipient must sequester or destroy the info, and can t disclose it until issue is resolved. Recipient may present info to court under seal to resolve. Conclusion: Stop, Notify and Return inadvertently produced documents
39 Iowa Ethics Opinion Interception under color of right (e.g., employer intercepts, claims employee violated rules re: nonbusiness use of work computers) ISBA Ethics and Guidelines Cmt. rejects ABA Opinions contending no need to notify and return ISBA: Stop, Notify and Return apply here, too so all parties are on notice and can litigate claim of right
40 Iowa Ethics Opinion Wrongful Interception (e.g., client intentionally intercepts confidential communication between other party, her attorney)? Crime-fraud exception to obligation of client confidentiality, Rule 32:1.6(b)(2) lawyer may reveal info where lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent client from committing crime/fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to financial interests or property of another
41 Iowa Ethics Opinion Wrongful Interception: Advise client of counsel s duty to stop, notify and return If client objects, counsel should vet crime-fraud exception to client confidentiality under Rules of Prof. Conduct If this mandates disclosure, return the documents to lawyer involved or file same under seal with court without explanation and withdraw
42 THANK YOU Follow up questions can be directed to Timothy J. Hill at Cedar Rapids 2007 First Avenue SE PO Box 2804 Cedar Rapids, Iowa Ph: Fax: Iowa City Tower Place One South Gilbert Iowa City, Iowa Ph: Fax:
In-House Ethics: Important Questions. Dorsey & Whitney. Dorsey & Whitney LLP. All Rights Reserved.
In-House Ethics: Important Questions Ella Solomons Deloitte Kenneth L. Jorgensen David C. Singer Dorsey & Whitney Overall Responsibility A law firm... shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that all lawyers
More informationCase 2:13-cv MMB Document 173 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:13-cv-05101-MMB Document 173 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TALBOT TODD SMITH CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 13-5101 UNILIFE CORPORATION,
More informationDavid J. Bright MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES
MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES David J. Bright Direct Number: (515) 286-7015 Facsimile: (515) 286-7050 E-Mail: djbright@nyemaster.com
More informationEthical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel
Ethical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel 2017 ACC Fall Symposium October 6, 2017 Today s Presenter(s): Lynn W. Hartman Member Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman, PLC Phone: 319-896-4083 Email: lhartman@spmblaw.com
More informationMany Hats, One Set of Rules: Ethical Beartraps for In-House Counsel
Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients 777 E. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee,WI 53202 414.271.2400 Many Hats, One
More informationTechnology and the Threat to the Attorney- Client Privilege Suzanne Valdez
Technology and the Threat to the Attorney- Client Privilege Suzanne Valdez May 17-18, 2018 University of Kansas School of Law Technology and the Threat to the Attorney-Client Privilege Recent Developments
More informationQuestions: 1. May Lawyer file an affidavit for change of judge against Judge X in Defendant s case?
FORMAL OPINION NO -193 Candor, Independent Professional Judgment, Communication, Seeking Disqualification of Judges Facts: Lawyer practices primarily in ABC County and represents Defendant in a personal-injury
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
E-FILED 2014 JAN 02 736 PM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY BELLE OF SIOUX CITY, L.P., v. Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant MISSOURI RIVER HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT,
More informationCase 1:14-cv FB-RLM Document 492 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13817
Case 1:14-cv-04717-FB-RLM Document 492 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13817 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCurrent Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions:
Current Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions: The Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Protection, and Rules of Professional Conduct 1.6 & 2.3 Presenters: John K. Villa & Charles Davant Williams &
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 0 1 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney KENDALL J. NEWMAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 01 I Street, Suite -0 Sacramento, CA 1 Telephone: ( -1 GREGORY G. KATSAS Acting Assistant Attorney General
More informationWhat Keeps You Up at Night?
What Keeps You Up at Night? Issues of Fraud and Abuse Compliance Series Keeping In House Out of the Doghouse Invoking the Attorney- Client Privilege 37 Offices in 18 Countries 2 Keeping In House Out of
More informationThe attorney-client privilege
BY TIMOTHY J. MILLER AND ANDREW P. SHELBY TIMOTHY J. MILLER is partner and general counsel at Novack and Macey LLP. As co-chair of the firm s legal malpractice defense group, he represents law firms and
More informationSELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONALISM The Buck Stops Here: Ethics and Professionalism for In-House Counsel SELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT The Rules listed below are those
More informationInternal Investigations: Practical and Ethical Concerns Facing In-House Counsel
Internal Investigations: Practical and Ethical Concerns Facing In-House Counsel Presented by: Colin Folawn and Brian Keeley December 10, 2014 Caveats Not intended to create an attorney-client relationship
More informationADVOCATE MODEL RULE 3.1
ADVOCATE MODEL RULE 3.1 1 RULE 3.1 - MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS (a) A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and
More informationCase 1:17-mc DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:17-mc-00105-DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 20 Case 1:17-mc-00105-DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 2 of 20 but also DENIES Jones Day s Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. Applicants may
More informationETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL
ETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL GUEST SPEAKERS SARAH MENENDEZ Senior Litigation Counsel T +1.713.918.1039 sarah_menendez@bmc.com SEAN GORMAN Trial Partner T +1.713.221.1221 sean.gorman@bracewell.com
More informationNYCLA COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS. OPINION No Date Issued: 3/24/08. Topic
NYCLA COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION No. 738 Date Issued: 3/24/08 Topic Searching inadvertently sent metadata in opposing counsel s electronic documents. Digest A lawyer who receives from an
More informationConflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1
Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law Janet Savage 1 Plaintiffs suing their former employers for wrongful discharge or employment discrimination
More informationLegal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data
Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data Peter L. Ostermiller Attorney at Law 239 South Fifth Street Suite 1800 Louisville, KY 40202 peterlo@ploesq.com www.ploesq.com Overview What is Metadata?
More informationEvaluating the Demand Letter
Evaluating the Demand Letter and What To Do After You Receive It May 15, 2018 Christine B. Lucy, Associate General Counsel, Booz Allen Hamilton Deborah Kelly, Partner, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP Nigel
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial
More informationResponding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP Today s Agenda Corporate Criminal Liability Enforcement Environment General
More informationMISCONDUCT. Committee Opinion May 11, 1993
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1528 OBLIGATION TO REPORT ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT. You have presented a hypothetical situation in which Attorney (P) is employed by a law firm and is contacted by a client to represent
More informationDocument Analysis Technology Group (DATG) and Records Management Alert
February 2007 Authors: Carolyn M. Branthoover +1.412.355.5902 carolyn.branthoover@klgates.com Karen I. Marryshow +1.412.355.6379 karen.marryshow@klgates.com K&L Gates comprises approximately 1,400 lawyers
More informationCase 6:10-cv LED Document 450 Filed 08/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13992
Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 450 Filed 08/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13992 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION VIRNETX INC., Plaintiff, vs. CISCO SYSTEMS,
More informationToday s Topics 8/22/2012. Records Involving Attorney Client Communications and Work Product Public Records Law Webinar Series
Records Involving Attorney Client Communications and Work Product Frayda Bluestein bluestein@sog.unc.edu Chris McLaughlin mclaughlin@sog.unc.edu Mujeeb Shah Khan mujeeb.shahkhan@greensboro nc.gov 2012
More informationDeposition Do s and Don ts 1 hour
Deposition Do s and Don ts 1 hour Copyright 2016 by Comedian of Law LLC All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Written permission must be secured from the publisher to use or reproduce
More informationDefense Counsel's Duties When Client Insists On Testifying Falsely
Ethics Opinion 234 Defense Counsel's Duties When Client Insists On Testifying Falsely Rule 3.3(a) prohibits the use of false testimony at trial. Rule 3.3(b) excepts from this prohibition false testimony
More informationSECTION 2 BEFORE FILING SUIT
Contents ETHICAL ISSUES IN LITIGATION... 2 HANDLING FALSE INFORMATION... 2 MR 3.3: Candor Towards the Tribunal... 3 Timing of the False Testimony Before the witness takes the stand.... 4 Under oath....
More informationCase 3:16-cv HZ Document 24 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:16-cv-01721-HZ Document 24 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KIERSTEN MACFARLANE, Plaintiff, No. 3:16-cv-01721-HZ OPINION & ORDER v. FIVESPICE
More informationThe Art and Ethics of Cross-Examination Outline
I. Cross-Examination The Art and Ethics of Cross-Examination a. What Is It? Cross-examination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth. You can do anything with a bayonet except
More informationEthical Issues in Representing or Litigating Against Organizations. Dennis P. Duffy 2016
Ethical Issues in Representing or Litigating Against Organizations Dennis P. Duffy 2016 Ex Parte Communications Communication with Class/Collective Action Members Contact with class members in EEOC action
More informationSoup to Nuts: the Inception and Destruction of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Protections
Soup to Nuts: the Inception and Destruction of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Protections Hennepin County Bar Association Professionalism and Ethics Section April 10, 2015 George
More informationThe Attorney as Third-Party Neutral: Navigating Ethical Obligations
The Attorney as Third-Party Neutral: Navigating Ethical Obligations John M. Delehanty Partner Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C. Washington, D.C. April 20, 2012 Sources of Ethical Rules
More informationINDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT
Indiana False Claims and Whistleblower Protection Act, codified at 5-11-5.5 et seq (as amended through P.L. 109-2014) Indiana Medicaid False Claims and Whistleblower Protection Act, codified at 5-11-5.7
More informationJuly 5, Conflicts for the Lawyer
Wisconsin Formal Ethics Opinion EF-11-02: Conflicts in Criminal Practice Arising From Concurrent Part-time Employment as an Assistant District Attorney and a Lawyer in a Private Law Firm July 5, 2011 Synopsis:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., and TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 14 C 206 ATTURO TIRE CORP., and SVIZZ-ONE Judge
More informationEthical Obligations and Responsibilities of Trial and Appellate Attorneys Lyana Hunter UNC Chapel Hill School of Government (August 2015)
Ethical Obligations and Responsibilities of Trial and Appellate Attorneys Lyana Hunter UNC Chapel Hill School of Government (August 2015) Discussion of the following rules and opinions: Rule 1.1 Competence
More informationAdams v. Barr. Opinion. Supreme Court of Vermont February 2, 2018, Filed No
No Shepard s Signal As of: February 7, 2018 8:38 PM Z Adams v. Barr Supreme Court of Vermont February 2, 2018, Filed No. 17-224 Reporter 2018 VT 12 *; 2018 Vt. LEXIS 10 ** Lesley Adams, William Adams and
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Professional Responsibility And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question In 1995, Lawyer
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CELEXA AND LEXAPRO ) MDL DOCKET NO. 1736 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) ALL CASES MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before me now is
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-10589 Document: 00514661802 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT In re: ROBERT E. LUTTRELL, III, Appellant United States Court of Appeals
More informationEmergency Ethics 101 A Model Rules Analysis. Cara E. Greene, Esq. March In conjunction with the panel: The Ethics of the Disruptive Client
, Esq. March 2017 In conjunction with the panel: The Ethics of the Disruptive Client Cara E. Green, Esq. Jeffrey Patton, Esq. Sonya Richburg, Esq. Brenda Wills-Sutton, Esq. American Bar Association, Ethics
More informationRules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012
Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012 20 West Street Boston, MA 02111-1218 TELEPHONE (617) 338-0500 FAX (617) 338-0550
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION THE JOHN ERNST LUCKEN REVOCABLE TRUST, and JOHN LUCKEN and MARY LUCKEN, Trustees, Plaintiffs, No. 16-CV-4005-MWB vs.
More informationCase 3:16-cv JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Case 3:16-cv-00054-JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SUPREME FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL KENNEDY and FERRELL WELCH,
More information4/20/2016 ETHICS. Jasmin Mize & Ken Troccoli, AFPDs (Alex.) W E S T
ETHICS Jasmin Mize & Ken Troccoli, AFPDs (Alex.) W E S T 2 1 PROFESSIONALISM COURSE QUESTION 1-W (1 POINT) According to the VA Bar, the loss of public esteem for the legal profession stems, in large part,
More informationPrompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege
Prompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege by Monica L. Goebel and John B. Nickerson Workplace Harassment In order to avoid liability for workplace harassment, an employer must show that it exercised
More informationETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence
1 ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM Striving for Excellence Objectives 2 Identify ethical issues in dependency practice for GAL attorneys and Attorneys
More informationDISQUALIFICATION OF THE ADVOCATE/WITNESS Adopted June 18, 1988 Revised June 18, 1994, May 10, 1997 and October 20, 2012
As revised by Editing Subcommittee 2/20/2013 78 DISQUALIFICATION OF THE ADVOCATE/WITNESS Adopted June 18, 1988 Revised June 18, 1994, May 10, 1997 and October 20, 2012 Introduction and Scope This opinion
More informationL.A. COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS COMMITTEE
L.A. COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS COMMITTEE FORMAL ETHICS OPINION NO. 497 MARCH 8, 1999 CONSULTING WITH A CLIENT DURING A DEPOSITION SUMMARY In a deposition of a client,
More informationDefendants Look for Broader Interpretation of Halliburton II
Defendants Look for Broader Interpretation of Halliburton II June 7, 2016 Robert L. Hickok hickokr@pepperlaw.com Gay Parks Rainville rainvilleg@pepperlaw.com Reprinted with permission from the June 7,
More informationEthics for Municipal Attorneys
LEAGUE OF WISCONSIN MUNICIPALITIES 2018 MUNICIPAL ATTORNEYS INSTITUTE June 20, 2018 Ethics for Municipal Attorneys Presented by: Dean R. Dietrich, Esq. Ruder Ware L.L.S.C. P.O. Box 8050 Wausau, WI 54402-8050
More informationCase 3:05-cv B-BLM Document 783 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case :0-cv-0-B-BLM Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 ROBERT S. BREWER, JR. (SBN ) JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN 0) 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 WILLIAM F. LEE (admitted
More informationSTIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Filed D.C. Sl\p"~rj:)r 10 Apr: ]() P03:07 Clerk ot Court C'j'FI. STEVEN 1. ROSEN Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION v. Case No.: 09 CA 001256 B Judge Erik P. Christian
More informationETHICS ISSUES FOR PUBLIC ATTORNEYS
ETHICS ISSUES FOR PUBLIC ATTORNEYS Patrick R. Burns First Assistant Director Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility 1500 Landmark Towers 345 St. Peter St. St. Paul, MN 55102 651-296-3952 http://lprb.mncourts.gov
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/2015 05:15 PM INDEX NO. 652471/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015 Exhibit 1 Document1 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SNI/SI
More informationPRESERVING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS. Chief Counsel, Investigations
PRESERVING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS Eric J. Gorman Partner Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Lawrence Oliver,
More informationEthics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations. October 5, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Ethics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations October 5, 2017 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ETHICS: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, THE WORK-PRODUCT DOCTRINE,
More informationADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE
ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE Parties who agree to arbitrate under the Rules may use the following clause in their agreement: ADRIC Arbitration
More informationMONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE NUMBER: JC31.1 FALSE CLAIMS LAWS
MONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE NUMBER: JC31.1 FALSE CLAIMS LAWS OWNER: DEPARTMENT OF COMPLIANCE EFFECTIVE: REVIEW/REVISED: SUPERCEDES:
More information) No. SB D RICHARD E. CLARK, ) ) No Respondent. ) ) O P I N I O N REVIEW FROM DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION
In the Matter of SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc RICHARD E. CLARK, ) Attorney No. 9052 ) ) Arizona Supreme Court ) No. SB-03-0113-D ) Disciplinary Commission ) No. 00-1066 Respondent. ) ) O P I N I O
More informationINVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS
INVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS Wes Bearden, CEO Attorney & Licensed Investigator Bearden Investigative Agency, Inc. www.beardeninvestigations.com PRIVILEGE KEY POINTS WE ALL KNOW
More informationOctober Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
OCTOBER 25, 2013 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE October Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationCase 2:05-cv CNC Document 119 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.
Case 2:05-cv-00467-CNC Document 119 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN INDIA BREWING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 05-C-0467 MILLER BREWING CO., Defendant.
More informationMCNABB ASSOCIATES, P.C.
1101 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SUITE 600 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004 345 U.S. App. D.C. 276; 244 F.3d 956, * JENNIFER K. HARBURY, ON HER OWN BEHALF AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF EFRAIN BAMACA-VELASQUEZ,
More informationPreparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness
Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness Presented by Sam Ramer (Counsel and VP, Government Relations, Symplicity Corporation), Leslie B. Kiernan (Partner, Akin Gump), Kristine L. Sendek-Smith (Partner,
More informationE-Discovery. Help or Hindrance? NEW FEDERAL RULES ON
BY DAWN M. BERGIN NEW FEDERAL RULES ON E-Discovery Help or Hindrance? E lectronic information is changing the litigation landscape. It is increasing the cost of litigation, consuming increasing amounts
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationABA Formal Opinion October 8, 2009
ABA Formal Opinion 09-455 October 8, 2009 Disclosure of Conflicts Information When Lawyers Move Between Law Firms When a lawyer moves between law firms, both the moving lawyer and the prospective new firm
More informationCase: 2:15-cv WOB-JGW Doc #: 43 Filed: 07/13/17 Page: 1 of 12 - Page ID#: 379
Case: 2:15-cv-00013-WOB-JGW Doc #: 43 Filed: 07/13/17 Page: 1 of 12 - Page ID#: 379 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT COVINGTON CIVIL ACTION
More informationMISCONDUCT BY ATTORNEYS OR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB)
MISCONDUCT BY ATTORNEYS OR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB) Section 102.177 of the Board s Rules and Regulations controls the conduct of attorneys and party representatives/non
More informationThe SEC proposes to codify the rule as a new Part 205 to Chapter 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC PROPOSES RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR ATTORNEYS APPEARING AND PRACTICING BEFORE THE SEC SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP DECEMBER 16, 2002 On November 21, 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationETHICS TOOLKIT FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL MANAGING LITIGATION APRIL 3, 2014
ETHICS TOOLKIT FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL MANAGING LITIGATION APRIL 3, 2014 Kenneth L. Racowski Chair, Philadelphia Commercial Litigation Wilson Elser LLP Daniel E. McGuire Commercial & Employment Litigation
More informationO.C.G.A. TITLE 23 Chapter 3 Article 6. GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved.
O.C.G.A. TITLE 23 Chapter 3 Article 6 GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session *** TITLE 23. EQUITY CHAPTER 3. EQUITABLE REMEDIES
More informationRecent Developments in False Claims Act Law. Norman G. Tabler, Jr. Faegre Baker Daniels
Recent Developments in False Claims Act Law Norman G. Tabler, Jr. Faegre Baker Daniels False Claims Act 31 USC 3729 creates liability for knowingly submitting false or fraudulent claim. Each request for
More informationNAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1
NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1 Question: The Ethics Counselors of the National Association for Public Defense (NAPD) have been asked to address the following scenario: An investigator working for Defense
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT Rule 1.1: Competence Client-Lawyer Relationship Rule 1.1 Competence A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation
More informationINTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP I. The use of internal investigations has increased significantly. Based on
More informationEthical Issues Facing Corporate Counsel
December 8, 2016 Ethical Issues Facing Corporate Counsel Best Practices Solutions Michael P. McCloskey, Partner James R. Edwards, SVP, GC, & David J. Aveni, Senior Counsel Corporate Secretary Wilson Elser
More informationDISCOVERY IN DECLINED QUI TAM CASES
DISCOVERY IN DECLINED QUI TAM CASES Federal Bar Association s 2018 Qui Tam Conference February 28, 2018 Susan S. Gouinlock, Esq. Wilbanks and Gouinlock, LLP Jennifer Verkamp, Esq. Morgan Verkamp Sara Kay
More informationView from a Federal Prosecutor: Legal Pitfalls to Avoid. Medtrade Spring March 28, 2018 Mark Rush Josh Skora
View from a Federal Prosecutor: Legal Pitfalls to Avoid Medtrade Spring March 28, 2018 Mark Rush Josh Skora Please Complete Your Evaluation Everyone should have received an evaluation form upon entering
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationPurpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration
Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration The purpose of the San Gabriel Valley Lawyer Referral Service Mandatory Fee Arbitration Program is to resolve fee disputes between clients and attorneys. Clients and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
-BLM Leeds, LP v. United States of America Doc. 1 LEEDS LP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 0CV0 BTM (BLM) 1 1 1 1 0 1 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Defendant.
More informationComments on the Council's Proposed Adaptation offre 502
REPORT OF THE COMMERCIAL AND FEDERAL LITIGATION SECTION REGARDING THE NEW YORK STATE-FEDERAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL'S "REPORT ON THE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN FEDERAL AND NEW YORK STATE WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT
More informationWASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT. This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false claims act.
Added by Chapter 241, Laws 2012. Effective date June 7, 2012. RCW 74.66.005 Short title. WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false
More informationStreamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures
RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEREK GUBALA, Case No. 15-cv-1078-pp Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Practices & Checklist
ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Practices & Checklist Bradley J. Gross, Esq. * Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. 3111 Stirling Road Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312 (954) 364-6044 BGross@Becker-Poliakoff.com * Chair, e-business
More informationETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRO BONO LAWYERS Prepared by Attorney Patricia Zeeh Risser LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRO BONO LAWYERS Prepared by Attorney Patricia Zeeh Risser LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN for the Marquette Volunteer Legal Clinic Lawyer and Student Volunteers December 11, 2008
More informationEthics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer
Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer By: Heather Barbieri 1400 Gables Court Plano, TX 75075 972.424.1902 phone 972.208.2100 fax hbarbieri@barbierilawfirm.com www.barbierilawfirm.com TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-B-BLM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 ROBERT S. BREWER, JR. (SBN ) JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN ) MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone:() -00 Facsimile: () -0
More informationThe Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel. The Attorney-Client Privilege
The Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel Labor & Employment Law Seminar June 9, 2011 Linda Walton Chelsea Dwyer Petersen The Attorney-Client Privilege
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2015 06:04 PM INDEX NO. 650312/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015 ExhibitA SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW YORK COUNTYOFNEW YORK BANK HAPOALIM B.M., vs.
More informationDOJ Issues Memorandum Urging Government Lawyers to Dismiss Meritless False Claims Act Cases
Special Matters and Government Investigations & Appellate Practice Groups February 1, 2018 DOJ Issues Memorandum Urging Government Lawyers to Dismiss Meritless False Claims Act Cases The Department of
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: accwebcast@commpartners.com Thank You! Pitfalls and Potholes
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 17-cv-00087 (CRC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION New York
More information