Intellectual Property and Antitrust Seminar (Fall 2017)
|
|
- Meryl Molly Stevenson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Intellectual Property and Antitrust Seminar (Fall 2017) Darren S. Tucker / darrentucker20817@gmail.com Office Hours: By appointment (also available to answer questions via and phone) The seminar will focus on the U.S. approach to antitrust matters involving intellectual property rights. The course will include guest speakers, including from the U.S. antitrust agencies and leading practitioners. Reading: There is no required textbook for this class. I will provide links or citations below for all required reading assignments. I will also provide lists of additional resources; these are not required readings, but rather intended to serve as possible background material for papers. Grading: Grades will be based on your seminar paper, with the possibility of a half grade (A to A+ or A-) adjustment based on class participation. Papers should be pages in length, double spaced. Paper deadlines: October 24 Paper topic November 7 Outline of paper November 21 and 28 In-class presentation of papers December 12 Final paper Schedule: August 22 Overview of U.S. Agencies Approach to Antitrust Matters Involving Intellectual Property Rights; the Economics of Innovation U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property 1-2, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4 (2017), [hereinafter IP Guidelines] Comment of the Global Antitrust Institute, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, on the U.S. Antitrust Agencies Proposed Update of the Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property Sections 1-2 (2016), Richard A. Posner, Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach, 19 J. ECON. PERPSECTIVES 57 (2005) Douglas H. Ginsburg & Joshua D. Wright, Dynamic Analysis and the Limits of Antitrust Institutions, 78 ANTITRUST L.J. 1 (2012) August 29 No class 1
2 September 5 Refusals to license and discriminatory licensing Guest lecturer: Jonathan Gleklen, Partner and Chair of Antitrust Practice Group, Arnold & Porter U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition, (2007), [hereinafter Promoting Innovation and Competition] In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation (CSU v. Xerox), 203 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000) Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997) Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp., 36 F.3d 1147 (1st Cir. 1994) September 12 Tying, Bundling, Grantbacks, and Cross-Licensing Guest lecturer: John Yun, Director of Economic Education, Global Antitrust Institute; former Acting Deputy Assistant Director, Bureau of Economics, FTC IP Guidelines 5.3, 5.5, 5.6 Promoting Innovation and Competition at 57-64, 91-93, Illinois Tool Works v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28, 31, 33-40, (2006) Additional resources: United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001) September 19 Bad Faith Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Guest lecturer: Henry Su, Partner, Constantine Cannon; former advisor to FTC Chairwoman Ramirez and Commissioner Rosch IP Guidelines 6 Walker Process Equip, Inc. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965) Professional Real Estate Investors v. Columbia Pictures Industries (PRE), 508 U.S. 49 (1993) Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 601 F.2d 986 (9th Cir. 1979) September 26 Antitrust Issues Involving SEPs, Part 1 Guest lecturer: Alden Abbott, Deputy Director and Senior Legal Fellow at Heritage Foundation; former Deputy Director, Office of International Affairs, FTC Promoting Innovation and Competition at
3 Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust and Information Technologies, 68 FLA. L. REV. 419, (2017), Broadcom v. Qualcomm, 501 F.3d 297 (3rd Cir. 2007) Rambus v. FTC, 522 F.3d 456 (D.C. Cir. 2008) Statement of the Commission, In the Matter of Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC (2008), Dissenting Statement of Chairman Majoras, In the Matter of Negotiated Data Solutions LLC (2008), Dissenting Statement of Commissioner William E. Kovacic, In the Matter of Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC (2008), Additional resources Bruce H. Kobayashi & Joshua D. Wright, Federalism Substantive Preemption, and Limits on Antitrust: An Application to Patent Holdup, 5 J. COMPETITION L. ECON. 13, , Koren W. Wong-Ervin & Joshua D. Wright, Intellectual Property and Standard Setting, 17 FEDERALIST SOCIETY REV. 52 (2016), Anne Layne-Farrar & Koren W. Wong-Ervin, Standard-Essential Patents and Market Power, WORLD COMPETITION DAY (2016), United States OECD Submission on Intellectual Property and Standard Setting (2014), )116&doclanguage=en October 3 Antitrust Issues Involving SEPs, Part 2 Guest lecturer: Will Tom, Partner at Morgan Lewis; a principal drafter of 1995 IP Guidelines Statement of the Commission, In the Matter of Google Inc. (2013), mm.pdf Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen, In the Matter of Motorola Mobility LLC and Google Inc. (2013), nstmt.pdf Carl Shapiro and Mark Lemley, Injunctions, Hold-Up, and Patent Royalties, 12 AM. L. & ECON. REV. 280 (2010), 3
4 Douglas H Ginsburg. et al, The Troubling Use of Antitrust to Regulate FRAND Licensing, 10 ANTITRUST CHRON. 1 (2015), Douglas H. Ginsburg et al., Excessive Royalty Prohibitions and the Dangers of Punishing Vigorous Competition and Harming Incentives to Innovate, 4 CPI ANTITRUST CHRON. 13 (2016), Joseph Kattan, PC, The Next FRAND Battle: Why the Royalty Base Matters, ANTITRUST CHRON., Mar. 2015, Royalty-Base-Matters-CPI pdf Case C-170/13, Huawei Technologies Co. v. ZTE Corp., 2015 E.C.R. I-1 (E.C.J. 2015), g=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid= Jorge Padilla & Koren W. Wong-Ervin, Portfolio Licensing at the End-User Device Level: Analyzing Refusals to License FRAND-Assured Standard-Essential Patents at the Component Level, 62 ANTITRUST BULLETIN (forthcoming 2017), Anne Layne-Farrar, Nondiscriminatory Pricing: Is Standard Setting Different?, 6 J. COMPETITION L. ECON. 811 (2010), October 10 No class October 17 Patent Portfolio Acquisitions and Patent Pools Guest Speaker: Frances Marshall, Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, Appellate Section, U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division (tentative) Promoting Innovation and Competition at Statement of the Department of Justice s Antitrust Division on Its Decision to Close Its Investigations of Google Inc. s Acquisition of Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. and the Acquisitions of Certain Patents by Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Research in Motion Ltd. (Feb. 13, 2012), Case No. COMP/M.6381, Google/Motorola Mobility, Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 139/2004, 2012 O. J. (1068), pdf Letter from Joel I. Klein, Acting Assistant Attorney Gen., U.S. Dep t of Justice, to Garrard R. Beeney, Esq. (June 26, 1997), Letter from Joel I. Klein, Assistant Attorney Gen., U.S. Dep t of Justice, to Garrard R. Beeney, Esq. (Dec. 16, 1998), 4
5 Letter from Joel I. Klein, Assistant Attorney Gen., U.S. Dep t of Justice, to Carey R. Ramos, Esq. (June 10, 1999), Letter from Charles A. James, Assistant Attorney Gen., U.S. Dep t of Justice, to Ky P. Ewing, Esq. (Nov. 12, 2002), October 24 - Reverse-Payment Settlements and Incremental Innovations ( Product Hopping ) Guest Speakers: Markus Meier, Assistant Director for Health Care Division, FTC FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 133 S.Ct (2013) New York v. Actavis, PLC, 787 F.3d 638 (2nd Cir. 2015) Mylan Pharm., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Ltd., 2015 WL at *14 (E.D. Pa. 2015) C. Scott Hemphill et al, Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem, 81 N.Y.U. LAW REV. 101 (2006), Douglas H. Ginsburg et al, Actavis and Multiple ANDA Entrants: Beyond the Temporary Duopoly, 29 ANTITRUST 89 (2015), Douglas H. Ginsburg et al, Product Hopping and the Limits of Antitrust: The Danger of Micromanaging Innovation, CPI ANTITRUST CHRON., Dec. 2015, Brief for Amicus Curiae Federal Trade Commission Supporting Plaintiff-Appellant, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Warner-Chilcott PLC, No (3rd Cir. Sept. 30, 2015), October 31 Divergence Between U.S. and Non-U.S. Approach to Antitrust Enforcement of Intellectual Property Issues Guest lecturer: Hill Wellford, Partner at Morgan Lewis; Co-chair, ABA Dominance Divergence Task Force European Commission, Submission to the OECD Roundtable on Refusals to Deal (October 2007), (Pay particular attention to the discussion of the EC s decisions in IMS Health and Microsoft.) European Commission press release, Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections to Google on Android operating system and applications (April 2016), European Commission press release, Antitrust: Commission fines Google 2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service (June 2017), 5
6 Japanese Fair Trade Commission press release, Cease and Desist Order against QUALCOMM Incorporated (September 2009), /sep/individual html. (Note: please print the JFTC s explanatory graphic/cartoon and bring it with you to class.) We will be comparing the approaches in the foregoing matters to the US approach, which is reflected in part by previous class discussion of Promoting Innovation and Competition (pp ) and the Broadcom, Rambus, Microsoft Corp. and Illinois Tool Works cases. Also, you may wish to review the basic holding in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkline Communications, Inc., 555 U.S. 438 (2009). November 7 Antitrust Issues Involving SEPs, Part 3: FRAND and the International Trade Commission Guest Speaker: Scott Kieff, George Washington University Law School; former Commissioner at the U.S. International Trade Commission Initial Determination on Remand, In re Certain 3G Mobile Handsets and Components Thereof ( InterDigital v. Nokia ), Inv. No. 337-TA-613, (ITC Apr. 27, 2015), Version-of-ID-on-Remand.pdf Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, In re Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/or 4G Capabilities and Components Thereof ( InterDigital v. Nokia ), Inv. No. 337-TA-868, (ITC June 13, 2014), Determination-on-ViolationPUBLIC-337-TA-868smMRC.pdf Written Submission on the Public Interest of Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Edith Ramirez, In re Certain 3G Mobile Handsets & Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-613 (Int l Trade Comm n, July 10, 2015), Rameriz-Submission.pdf Written Submission on the Public Interest of Federal Trade Commissioners Maureen K. Ohlhausen & Joshua D. Wright, In re Certain 3G Mobile Handsets & Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-613 (Int l Trade Comm n, July 20, 2015), November 14 Patent assertion entities Guest lecturer: Mark Popofsky, Partner and Chair of Antitrust Practice Group, Ropes & Gray Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study (Oct. 2016) Executive Summary, Mark Popofsky & Michael Laufert, Patent Assertion Entities and Antitrust: Operating Company Patent Transfers, ANTITRUST SOURCE, April 2013, Assertion-Entities.pdf 6
7 Additional resources: Mark A. Lemley & A. Douglas Melamed, Missing the Forest for the Trolls, SSRN, May 28, 2015, Erica S. Mintzer & Suzanne Munck, The Joint U.S. Department Of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Workshop on Patent Assertion Entity Activities Follow the Money, 79 ANTITRUST L.J. 423 (2014) Joshua D. Wright & Douglas H. Ginsburg, Patent Assertion Entities and Antitrust: A Competition Cure for a Litigation Disease?, 79 ANTITRUST L.J. 501 (2014), Mark Popofsky & Michael Laufert, Antitrust Attacks on Patent Assertion Entities, 79 ANTITRUST L.J. 445 (2014), ALJ.pdf November 21 - Presentation of Papers Part I November 28 Presentation of Papers Part II Special thanks to Koren W. Wong-Ervin for developing much of this syllabus. 7
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN 3G MOBILE HANDSETS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Inv. No. 337-TA-613 (REMAND) REPLY OF J. GREGORY SIDAK, CHAIRMAN, CRITERION
More informationFinal Exam: The final exam is scheduled for May 8 at 6:00 PM. There is no make up exam.
Antitrust II (Spring 2018) Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg Professor of Law Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University Office: 450 I E mail: dginsbur@gmu.edu Welcome to Antitrust II This course examines
More informationIntellectual Property Rights and Antitrust Liability in the U.S.: The 2016 Landscape. Jonathan Gleklen Yasmine Harik Arnold & Porter LLP
Intellectual Property Rights and Antitrust Liability in the U.S.: The 2016 Landscape Jonathan Gleklen Yasmine Harik Arnold & Porter LLP June 2016 Perhaps the most fundamental question that arises at the
More informationAPLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions
APLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions Robert D. Fram Covington & Burling LLP Advanced Patent Law Institute Palo Alto, California December 11, 2015 1 Disclaimer The views set forth on
More informationThe New IP Antitrust Licensing Guidelines' Silence On SEPs
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The New IP Antitrust Licensing Guidelines'
More informationCOMMENT OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIONER JOSHUA D. WRIGHT AND JUDGE DOUGLAS H
COMMENT OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIONER JOSHUA D. WRIGHT AND JUDGE DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG ON THE JAPAN FAIR TRADE COMMISSION S DRAFT PARTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INTELLECTUAL
More informationEU Advocate General Opines That Seeking Injunctions On FRAND-Encumbered SEPs May Constitute an Abuse of Dominance
NOVEMBER 17-22, 2014 WRITTEN BY KENNETH H. MERBER EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN The views expressed in this e-bulletin are the views of the author alone. In this Issue: EU Advocate General Opines That
More informationTHE TROUBLING USE OF ANTITRUST TO REGULATE FRAND LICENSING
THE TROUBLING USE OF ANTITRUST TO REGULATE FRAND LICENSING Douglas H. Ginsburg George Mason University School of Law Koren W. Wong-Ervin George Mason University School of Law Joshua D. Wright George Mason
More informationEXTRA-JURISDICTIONAL REMEDIES INVOLVING PATENT LICENSING
EXTRA-JURISDICTIONAL REMEDIES INVOLVING PATENT LICENSING By Koren Wong-Ervin, Bruce H. Kobayashi, Douglas H. Ginsburg & Joshua D. Wright 1 I. INTRODUCTION In the last several years, competition agencies
More informationWHITHER SYMMETRY? ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AT THE FTC AND DOJ
WHITHER SYMMETRY? ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AT THE FTC AND DOJ Joshua D. Wright, George Mason University School of Law Douglas H. Ginsburg, George Mason University School of Law
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. THIRD PARTY UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION S STATEMENT ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT CONSOLES, RELATED SOFTWARE, AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Inv. No. 337-TA-752 THIRD PARTY UNITED
More informationRe: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No
The Honorable Donald S. Clark, Secretary Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No. 121-0081 Dear Secretary Clark: The
More informationCOMMENT ON THE CANADIAN COMPETITION BUREAU S DRAFT UPDATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES
COMMENT ON THE CANADIAN COMPETITION BUREAU S DRAFT UPDATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES Joshua D. Wright George Mason University School of Law Douglas H. Ginsburg George Mason University
More informationChallenging Anticompetitive Acquisitions and Enforcement of Patents *
Challenging Anticompetitive Acquisitions and Enforcement of Patents * While the enforcement of valid patents can play an important part in fostering innovation and competition, patent policy often works
More informationJanuary 3, General Comments
COMMENT OF THE GLOBAL ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, ON THE KOREA FAIR TRADE COMMISSION S AMENDMENT TO ITS REVIEW GUIDELINES ON UNFAIR EXERCISE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
More informationCOMMENT OF THE GLOBAL ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, ON THE STATE ADMINISTRATION FOR INDUSTRY
COMMENT OF THE GLOBAL ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, ON THE STATE ADMINISTRATION FOR INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE ANTI-MONOPOLY GUIDELINES ON THE ABUSE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
More informationAntitrust and Intellectual Property
and Intellectual Property July 22, 2016 Rob Kidwell, Member Antitrust Prohibitions vs IP Protections The Challenge Harmonizing U.S. antitrust laws that sanction the illegal use of monopoly/market power
More informationCOMMENT ON THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM COMMISSION S QUESTIONNAIRE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MISUSE ANTITRUST GUIDELINES
COMMENT ON THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM COMMISSION S QUESTIONNAIRE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MISUSE ANTITRUST GUIDELINES Douglas H. Ginsburg George Mason University School of Law Bruce H. Kobayashi
More informationSyllabus Parts I, II
Antitrust II (Spring 2019) Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg Professor of Law Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University Office: 450-I E-mail: dginsbur@gmu.edu Syllabus Parts I, II Welcome to Antitrust
More informationGLOBAL ANTITRUST INSTITUTE ECONOMICS INSTITUTE FOR COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS
GLOBAL ANTITRUST INSTITUTE ECONOMICS INSTITUTE FOR COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS 15 20 NOVEMBER, 2015 GLOBAL ANTITRUST INSTITUTE ECONOMICS INSTITUTE FOR COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS Sunday, 15
More informationFTC Approves Final Order in Google SEP Investigation, Responding to Commentators in a Separate Letter
WRITTEN BY BRENDAN J. COFFMAN AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN JULY 22-26, 2013 PATENTS FTC Approves Final Order in Google SEP Investigation, Responding to Commentators in a Separate Letter Last week, in a 2-1-1
More informationAnne Layne-Farrar Vice President, Adjunct Professor; Koren W. Wong-Ervin Director, Adjunct Professor of Law.
Jindal Global Law Review (2017) 8(2):127 160 DOI 10.1007/s41020-017-0048-9 ARTICLE Methodologies for calculating FRAND damages: an economic and comparative analysis of the case law from China, the European
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (1) Carte Blanche for SSOs? The Antitrust Division s Business Review Letter on the IEEE s Patent Policy Update Stuart M. Chemtob Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle September 2015 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle September 2015 (1) The Evolution of U.S. Antitrust Agencies Approach to Standards and Standard Essential Patents: From Enforcement to Advocacy James F. Rill Baker Botts L.L.P. www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationPATENT ASSERTION ENTITIES
PATENT ASSERTION ENTITIES AND ANTITRUST: A COMPETITION CURE FOR A LITIGATION DISEASE? Joshua D. Wright, George Mason University School of Law Douglas H. Ginsburg, George Mason University School of Law
More informationOctober 2014 Volume 14 Issue 1
theantitrustsource www. antitr ustsource. com October 2014 Volume 14 Issue 1 Implementing the FRAND Commitment Janusz Ordover and Allan Shampine examine the economic goals of FRAND terms for licensing
More informationTaking it to the Limit: Shifting U.S. Antitrust Policy Toward Standards Development
Essay Taking it to the Limit: Shifting U.S. Antitrust Policy Toward Standards Development Jorge L. Contreras You can spend all your time making money, You can spend all your love making time,... So put
More informationANSI s Submission to the Global Standards Collaboration GSC-18 IPRWG Meeting. April 20, 2015
ANSI s Submission to the Global Standards Collaboration GSC-18 IPRWG Meeting April 20, 2015 Patricia Griffin, VP and General Counsel ANSI GSC_IPR(15)01_006 Details of This Contribution Document No: Source:
More informationPatents, Standards and Antitrust: An Introduction
Patents, Standards and Antitrust: An Introduction Mark H. Webbink Senior Lecturing Fellow Duke University School of Law Nature of standards, standards setting organizations, and their intellectual property
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN 3G MOBILE HANDSETS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Investigation No. 337-TA-613 REMAND RESPONSE TO THE COMMISSION S NOTICE
More informationthe Patent Battleground:
The Antitrust Enforcers Charge Onto the Patent Battleground: What Technology Companies Need to Know About Standard-Related Patents, RAND Commitments, and Competition Law Presenters: Willard K. Tom John
More informationDistrict Court Denies Motion to Dismiss FTC Section 5 Complaint Against Qualcomm
CPI s North America Column Presents: District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss FTC Section 5 Complaint Against Qualcomm By Greg Sivinski 1 Edited by Koren Wong-Ervin August 2017 1 Early this year, the US
More informationAIPLA Comments on Questionnaire on IP Misuse Antitrust Guidelines
October 14, 2015 2015 10 14 Mr. Liu Jian Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Bureau National Development and Reform Commission People s Republic of China Re: AIPLA Comments on Questionnaire on IP Misuse
More informationTHE PROPER ANTITRUST TREATMENT
C O V E R S T O R I E S Antitrust, Vol. 27, No. 3, Summer 2013. 2013 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be
More informationStandard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword?
MAY 2008, RELEASE ONE Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword? Jennifer M. Driscoll Mayer Brown LLP Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When
More informationThe Antitrust Review of the Americas 2017
The Antitrust Review of the Americas 2017 Published by Global Competition Review in association with Analysis Group Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP Baker & Hostetler LLP Baker & McKenzie LLP Bennett Jones
More informationAssistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim Signals Shift in Antitrust/IP Focus
Antitrust Alert December 4, 2017 Key Points Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Makan Delrahim, the new head of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), recently announced a shift from the
More informationLatest Developments On Injunctive Relief For Infringement Of FRAND-Encumbered SEPs
August 7, 2013 Latest Developments On Injunctive Relief For Infringement Of FRAND-Encumbered SEPs This memorandum is directed to the current state of the case law in the U.S. International Trade Commission
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN 3G MOBILE HANDSETS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Inv. No. 337-TA-613 (REMAND) WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST OF
More informationFederal Circuit Provides Guidance on Methodologies for Calculating FRAND Royalty Rates, Vacating the Jury Award in Ericsson v.
In this Issue: WRITTEN BY COURTNEY J. ARMOUR AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN The views expressed in this e-bulletin are the views of the authors alone. DECEMBER 1-6, 2014 Federal
More informationPATENT HOLDUP, ANTITRUST, AND INNOVATION: HARNESS
PATENT HOLDUP, ANTITRUST, AND INNOVATION: HARNESS OR NOOSE? Joshua D. Wright Aubrey N. Stuempfle * ABSTRACT This essay reviews Michael Carrier s analysis of antitrust and standard setting in his new book,
More informationFTC AND DOJ ISSUE JOINT REPORT REGARDING ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
OF INTEREST FTC AND DOJ ISSUE JOINT REPORT REGARDING ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Interesting and difficult questions lie at the intersection of intellectual property rights and
More informationNos , -1631, -1362, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ERICSSON, INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON,
Case: 13-1625 Case: CASE 13-1625 PARTICIPANTS Document: ONLY 162 Document: Page: 1 150 Filed: Page: 03/12/2014 1 Filed: 02/27/2014 Nos. 2013-1625, -1631, -1362, -1633 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationDOJ and USPTO Issue Policy Statement on Remedies for F/RAND-Encumbered SEPs
JANUARY 7-11, 2013 THIS WEEK S CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR IS DINA KALLAY EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS DOJ and USPTO Issue Policy Statement on Remedies for F/RAND-Encumbered SEPs On January 8, the DOJ
More informationGoogle Settles with FTC Over SEPs; FTC Votes to Close Investigation Into Google s Search-Related Practices
December 24, 2012 - January 4, 2013 THIS WEEK S CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR IS FLAVIA FORTES EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS Google Settles with FTC Over SEPs; FTC Votes to Close Investigation Into Google
More informationRecent Decisions Provide Some Clarity on How Courts and Government Agencies Will Likely Resolve Issues Involving Standard-Essential Patents
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 4 9-1-2013 Recent Decisions Provide Some Clarity on How Courts and Government Agencies Will Likely Resolve Issues Involving Standard-Essential
More informationNTT DOCOMO Technical Journal. Akimichi Tanabe Takuya Asaoka Katsunori Tsunoda Makoto Kijima. 1. Introduction
Essential Patent Rights Exercise Restriction NPE 1. Introduction Recent growth in patent transactions has been accompanied by increasing numbers of patent disputes, especially in the field of information
More informationANTITRUST ATTACKS ON PATENT ASSERTION ENTITIES
ANTITRUST ATTACKS ON PATENT ASSERTION ENTITIES MARK S. POPOFSKY MICHAEL D. LAUFERT* PAEs are antitrust s latest new new thing. 1 The last few years have witnessed, as this Symposium attests, the antitrust
More informationPatent Holdup, Patent Remedies, and Antitrust Responses The Role of Patent Remedies and Antitrust Law in Dealing with Patent Holdups
Patent Holdup, Patent Remedies, and Antitrust Responses The Role of Patent Remedies and Antitrust Law in Dealing with Patent Holdups [abridged from 34 J. Corp. Law (forthcoming July 2009)] March 10, 2009
More informationWHY THE SUPREME COURT WAS CORRECT TO DENY CERTIORARI IN FTC V. RAMBUS
WHY THE SUPREME COURT WAS CORRECT TO DENY CERTIORARI IN FTC V. RAMBUS Joshua D. Wright, George Mason University School of Law George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series 09-14 This
More informationAntitrust/Intellectual Property Interface Under U.S. Law
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Antitrust/Intellectual Property Interface Under U.S.
More informationARBITRATION WITHOUT LAW: CHOICE OF LAW IN FRAND DISPUTES
ARBITRATION WITHOUT LAW: CHOICE OF LAW IN FRAND DISPUTES Eli Greenbaum* INTRODUCTION Recent arbitration between InterDigital and Huawei seems to demonstrate the purported advantages of arbitration as a
More informationFTC Orders Compulsory IP Licensing to Remedy Competitive Concerns in Honeywell/Intermec Transaction
SEPTEMBER 8-15, 2013 WRITTEN BY MAC CONFORTI AND LOGAN BREED MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS FTC Orders Compulsory IP Licensing to Remedy Competitive Concerns in Honeywell/Intermec Transaction The FTC required
More informationFederal Trade Commission Closes Google Investigation
A DV I S O RY January 2013 Federal Trade Commission Closes Google Investigation On January 3, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC or the Commission ) announced the resolution of two pending investigations
More informationFederal Court Dismisses Claims Against NPE for Allegedly Fraudulently Enforcing Its Patents; Upholds Breach of Contract and Promissory Estoppel Claims
FEBRUARY 4-8, 2013 WRITTEN BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS Federal Court Dismisses Claims Against NPE for Allegedly Fraudulently Enforcing Its Patents; Upholds Breach of Contract and Promissory Estoppel
More informationRecent Trends in Patent Damages
Recent Trends in Patent Damages Presentation for The Austin Intellectual Property Law Association Jose C. Villarreal May 19, 2015 These materials reflect the personal views of the speaker, are not legal
More informationFTC Commissioner Ohlhausen Recommends Cautious Treatment of Bosch and Google SEP Decisions
WRITTEN BY BRADLEY T. TENNIS AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN MARCH 18-22, 2013 PATENTS FTC Commissioner Ohlhausen Recommends Cautious Treatment of Bosch and Google SEP Decisions Last week, speaking at a symposium
More informationFRAND or Foe: Litigating Standard Essential Patents
FRAND or Foe: Litigating Standard Essential Patents Munich Seminar May 2013 Munich, Germany Christopher Dillon (Dillon@fr.com) Jan Malte Schley (Schley@fr.com) Brian Wells (wells@fr.com) Presentation Overview
More informationCourt in Microsoft v. Motorola Dismisses Injunctive Relief for Motorola Asserted Patents and Motorola s Entire H.264 SEP Portfolio
DECEMBER 3-7, 2012 WRITTEN BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS Court in Microsoft v. Motorola Dismisses Injunctive Relief for Motorola Asserted Patents and Motorola s Entire H.264 SEP Portfolio In Microsoft
More informationTips For Litigating Design-Arounds At ITC And Customs
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Tips For Litigating Design-Arounds At ITC And Customs
More informationInjunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents
Litigation Webinar Series: INSIGHTS Our take on litigation and trial developments across the U.S. Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents David Healey Sr. Principal, Fish & Richardson Houston,
More informationUNFAIR METHODS OF COMPETITION AFTER THE 2015 COMMISSION STATEMENT
UNFAIR METHODS OF COMPETITION AFTER THE 2015 COMMISSION STATEMENT Joshua D. Wright George Mason University School of Law Angela Diveley Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP The Antitrust Source, Forthcoming October
More informationSeeking Disapproval: Presidential Review Of ITC Orders
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Seeking Disapproval: Presidential Review Of ITC Orders
More informationDear Secretary Barton:
5775 Morehouse Drive, San Diego, California 92121-2779 Submission of Qualcomm Incorporated in Response to the Commission s Request for Written Submissions in Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable
More informationCourt Approves 24.3 Million in Attorneys' Fees in Pay-For- Delay Litigation
WRITTEN BY SHYLAH R. ALFONSO AND LOGAN BREED JUNE 30 -JULY 6, 2014 PATENTS Court Approves 24.3 Million in Attorneys' Fees in Pay-For- Delay Litigation On June 30, a federal judge in Tennessee issued an
More informationPenn State Law Webcast: A Deal Lawyers Guide to the Impact of the New Trump Administration on Laws Affecting Mergers and Acquisitions
Penn State Law Webcast: A Deal Lawyers Guide to the Impact of the New Trump Administration on Laws Affecting Mergers and Acquisitions January 19, 2017 Leon Greenfield, Partner Overview of Present Information
More informationUsing the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool
April 12, 2016 Webinar Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool Sheryl Koval Garko Principal, Boston Monty Fusco Of Counsel, Washington, DC Overview CLE Contact: MCLETeam@fr.com Materials available
More informationAntitrust IP Competition Perspectives
Antitrust IP Competition Perspectives Dr. Dina Kallay Counsel for IP and Int l Antitrust Federal Trade Commission The 6 th Annual Session of the UNECE Team of I.P. Specialists June 21, 2012 The views expressed
More informationNos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Case: 12-1548 Case: CASE 12-1548 PARTICIPANTS Document: ONLY 164 Document: Page: 1 152 Filed: Page: 03/20/2013 1 Filed: 03/20/2013 Nos. 2012-1548, 2012-1549 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationClarifying Competition Law: Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and EU/U.S. Competition/Antitrust Law. Robert S. K.
Clarifying Competition Law: Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and EU/U.S. Competition/Antitrust Law Robert S. K. Bell Arindam Kar Speakers Robert S. K. Bell Partner Bryan Cave London T: +44
More informationCase 1:13-cv RGA Document 27 Filed 05/09/13 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1591 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:13-cv-00010-RGA Document 27 Filed 05/09/13 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1591 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
More informationThe 100-Day Program at the ITC
The 100-Day Program at the ITC TECHNOLOGY August 9, 2016 Tuhin Ganguly gangulyt@pepperlaw.com David J. Shaw shawd@pepperlaw.com IN LIGHT OF AUDIO PROCESSING HARDWARE, IT IS NOW CLEAR THAT, WITH RESPECT
More informationThe ECJ s Huawei v. ZTE Decision and its Implementation in Practice
The ECJ s Huawei v. ZTE Decision and its Implementation in Practice Prof. Dr. Christian Donle, Attorney at Law Dr. Axel Oldekop, Attorney at Law December 2015 Overview I. Introduction II. III. The ECJ
More informationCase 1:13-cv RGA Document 17 Filed 02/11/13 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 227 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:13-cv-00008-RGA Document 17 Filed 02/11/13 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 227 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
More informationCase5:12-cv RMW Document41 Filed10/10/12 Page1 of 10
Case:-cv-0-RMW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 E-FILED on 0/0/ 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE PAST THREE YEARS, A NUMBER
C O V E R S T O R I E S Antitrust, Vol. 22, No. 2, Spring 2008. 2008 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be
More informationDOJ Issues Favorable BRL on Proposed Revisions to IEEE s Patent Policy
In this Issue: WRITTEN BY BRENDAN J. COFFMAN AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN DOJ Issues Favorable BRL on Proposed Revisions to IEEE s Patent Policy FEBRUARY 2-7, 2015 EC to Closely Watch Proposed Revisions to
More informationAIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October Licenses in European Patent Litigation
AIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October 2014 Licenses in European Patent Litigation Dr Jochen Bühling, Attorney-at-law/Partner, Krieger Mes & Graf v. Groeben Olivier Nicolle, French and European
More informationPatent Hold-Up: Down But Not Out
Antitrust, Vol. 29, No. 3, Summer 2015. 2015 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated
More informationCase 1:13-cv RGA Document 29 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 852 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:13-cv-00008-RGA Document 29 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 852 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
More informationANSI Report on U.S. Activities Related to IPR and Standards
Reference: GSC_IPR(15)01_007 Document Title: Source: Contact: GSC Session: Agenda Item: ANSI Report on U.S. Activities Related to IPR and Standards American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Patricia
More informationTHE USE AND THREAT OF INJUNCTIONS IN THE RAND CONTEXT. James Ratliff & Daniel L. Rubinfeld
Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 00(00), 1 22 doi:10.1093/joclec/nhs038 THE USE AND THREAT OF INJUNCTIONS IN THE RAND CONTEXT James Ratliff & Daniel L. Rubinfeld ABSTRACT We model a dispute between
More informationTHE ACTAVIS INFERENCE: THEORY AND PRACTICE
THE ACTAVIS INFERENCE: THEORY AND PRACTICE Aaron Edlin, Scott Hemphill, Herbert Hovenkamp & Carl Shapiro ABSTRACT In FTC v. Actavis, Inc., the Supreme Court considered reverse payment settlements of patent
More informationIntellectual Property E-Bulletin
Issue 78 August 2012 Inside This Issue ABA Antitrust Section Intellectual Property E-Bulletin The Intellectual Property Committee is pleased to present the latest issue of our monthly E-Bulletin, providing
More informationAddressing Standards Creation: Divergence or Convergence Across the Atlantic?
A R T I C L E S Antitrust, Vol. 25, No. 3, Summer 2011. 2011 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied
More informationSTANDARD SETTING AND ANTITRUST: SSOs, SEPs, F/RAND AND THE PATENT HOLDUP. Jeffery M. Cross Freeborn & Peters LLP
STANDARD SETTING AND ANTITRUST: SSOs, SEPs, F/RAND AND THE PATENT HOLDUP By Jeffery M. Cross Freeborn & Peters LLP Standards and standard setting have been thrust recently to the forefront of antitrust
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-1055 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE; TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.; TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, USA, Petitioners, v. KING DRUG COMPANY
More informationNo IN THE ( ourt of the: Petitioners, v. BAYER AG ~ ~D BAYER CORP., ETAL., Respondents.
No. 08-1194 OFFIUE OF 1HE CLEFI~ IN THE ( ourt of the: o I ARKANSAS CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, PAPER, A.E OF L., ETAL., Petitioners, v. BAYER AG ~ ~D BAYER CORP., ETAL., Respondents. ON PETITION
More informationThe Antitrust Review of the Americas 2013
The Antitrust Review of the Americas 2013 Published by Global Competition Review in association with Araújo e Policastro Advogados Baker & Miller PLLC Baker Hostetler Bennett Jones LLP Borden Ladner Gervais
More informationPublished by. Yearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Standard-essential patent monetisation and enforcement. Vringo, Inc David L Cohen
Published by Yearbook 2016 Building IP value in the 21st century Standard-essential patent monetisation and enforcement Vringo, Inc David L Cohen Vringo, Inc Monetisation and strategy X X Standard-essential
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT CONSOLES, RELATED SOFTWARE, AND
More informationANTITRUST AND THE IEEE S BYLAW AMENDMENTS
KEYNOTE ADDRESS AT THE IEEE S 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STANDARDIZATION AND INNOVATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANTITRUST AND THE IEEE S BYLAW AMENDMENTS J. Gregory Sidak * I. In February 2015,
More informationInternational Trade Daily Bulletin
International Trade Daily Bulletin VOL. 14, NO. 187 SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY This BNA Insights article by Hitomi Iwase, Tony Andriotis & Paul Dimitriadis examines the recent U.S. legal
More information5 Red Flags In Pharmaceutical Settlements
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 5 Red Flags In Pharmaceutical Settlements Law360,
More informationTechnology and IP Forum: Current global issues in SEP licensing, enforcement, and disputes December 4, 2018
Technology and IP Forum: Current global issues in SEP licensing, enforcement, and disputes December 4, 2018 Agenda Introduction to Standards, SEPs, and FRAND licensing Regional consideration and opportunities
More informationNos , In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Nos. 12-1548, 12-1549 In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APPLE INC. and NeXT SOFTWARE, INC. (formerly known as NeXT Computer, Inc.), v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, MOTOROLA, INC.
More informationJUDGE DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG
JUDGE DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG NON-ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 1986 Present Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit United States Courthouse 333 Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20001
More informationLaw in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents Hosted by: Methodological Overview of FRAND Rate Determination
More informationTaking the RAND Case to Trial
Taking the RAND Case to Trial By Eric W. Benisek and Richard C. Vasquez Eric W. Benisek and Richard C. Vasquez are partners at Vasquez Benisek & Lindgren, LLP, where their practices focus on intellectual
More informationCase 5:17-cv LHK Document 931 Filed 11/06/18 Page 1 of 26
Case :-cv-000-lhk Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. -CV-000-LHK v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING
More information