Google Settles with FTC Over SEPs; FTC Votes to Close Investigation Into Google s Search-Related Practices
|
|
- Edmund Burns
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 December 24, January 4, 2013 THIS WEEK S CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR IS FLAVIA FORTES EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS Google Settles with FTC Over SEPs; FTC Votes to Close Investigation Into Google s Search-Related Practices On January 3, the FTC voted 4-1 to accept a consent agreement package under which Google has agreed not to seek injunctive relief based on infringement of a FRAND-encumbered standard essential patent (SEP) unless certain conditions are met or except under limited exceptions. The Commission also voted 5-0 to close the investigation related to Google s search-related practices, concluding that the evidence did not demonstrate that Google s actions in this area violate U.S. antitrust law. With respect to SEPs, the Commission voted to issue for public comment a Complaint and Order against Google. The Complaint alleges that Google, and its predecessor in interest, Motorola Mobility, engaged in unfair methods of competition and unfair acts or practices by breaching its commitments to standard-setting organizations (SSOs) to license its SEPs on FRAND terms. Google violated its FRAND commitments by seeking to enjoin and exclude willing licensees of its FRAND-encumbered SEPs. (Compl. 1.) According to the FTC s Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment, the Proposed Consent Order is tailored to prevent Google from using injunctions against willing licensees. (Analysis at 6.) Under the Proposed Order, prior to seeking injunctive relief, Google must: (1) at least six months prior to pursuing injunctive relief, make a binding written offer to license that contains a full description of all material commercial terms proposed; (2) at least 60 days prior to pursuing injunctive relief, make a binding written offer to use binding arbitration to establish a licensing agreement; and (3) negotiate with the potential licensee for at least 6 months. Furthermore, if a potential licensee seeks judicial relief for a FRAND determination, Google must not seek an injunction during the pendency of the proceeding, including appeals. All licensees, whether they choose arbitration or litigation, must commit to honoring the independently determined royalty rate. Google may condition the offer to license on reciprocity (i.e., conditioning an offer to -1-
2 license on receiving a cross-license to the licensee s FRAND-encumbered SEPs to the same standard), but may not require the potential licensee to license any patent claim not essential to a standard practiced by the potential licensee or to license any other patents or intellectual property. Section II.E. of the Proposed Order provides that [n]othing in this Order shall prohibit Google from seeking injunctive relief for alleged infringement of a FRAND-encumbered SEP against a potential licensee who: (1) is outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Courts, (2) has stated in writing or sworn testimony that it will not license the SEP on any terms, (3) refuses to enter a license agreement covering the SEP on terms that have been set in the final ruling of a court or through binding arbitration, or (4) fails to provide the written confirmation as requested by Google in a FRAND Terms Letter (a binding irrevocable commitment to cross-license FRAND Patents on FRAND terms) within thirty days of receiving the letter. (Decision and Order at 7.) Section IV.F. further provides that Google shall be permitted to file a claim seeking injunctive relief against a potential licensee if the Potential Licensee is seeking or has sought on or after the date of this Order, injunctive relief against Google based on infringement of the potential licensee s FRAND-encumbered SEP. (Id. at ) The Commission voted to issue a Statement, with Commissioners J. Thomas Rosch and Ohlhausen abstaining. The Commission Statement contends that, if accepted, the Proposed Order may set a template for the resolution of SEP licensing disputes across many industries. (Commission Stmt. at 1.) Commissioner Rosch issued a Separate Statement criticizing the majority s decision to invoke a standalone unfair method of competition claim under Section 5 on the grounds that it is not clear what the limiting principles of such a claim would be. (Id. at 3.) Commissioner Rosch also noted that he was: troubled by Section IV.F. of the Proposed Order, which provides for a limited defensive use exception to Google s commitment not to seek injunctive relief on its FRAND-encumbered SEPs. That is, under certain circumstances, Google may seek injunctive relief against a firm that itself files a claim for injunctive relief against Google based on the firm s FRAND-encumbered SEPs. (Commissioner Rosch Separate Stmt. at 1 n.1.) According to Commissioner Rosch, injunctive relief should be prohibited only when the potential licensee is a willing licensee under FRAND terms. That is not what the consent decree provides. Nor is it the relief I would agree to. The only exception to this is when a federal court or some other neutral arbitrator has defined those terms. (Id. at 2 n.3 (internal citations omitted).) Commissioner Ohlhausen issued a dissenting statement voting against the consent agreement and dissenting from imposing liability on an owner of a SEP merely for petitioning the courts or the International Trade Commission. I dissent then in large part because I question whether such conduct, standing alone, violates Section 5 and because the Noerr-Pennington doctrine precludes Section 5 liability for conduct grounded in the legitimate pursuit of -2-
3 an injunction or any threats incidental to it, outside of a handful of wellestablished exceptions not alleged here. (Commissioner Ohlhausen Dissenting Stmt. at 1.) (Id. at 5.) [M]ore importantly, I believe the Commission s actions fail to provide meaningful limiting principles regarding what is a Section 5 violation in the standard-setting context, as evidenced by its shifting position in N-Data, Bosch, and this matter. Commissioner Ohlhausen noted that, even taking the much-criticized N-Data consent decree as a starting point, it is unclear whether this case meets the requirements identified by the Commission in that matter. (Id. at 5.) In N-Data, the Commission alleged that there was a clear promise to license by N-Data s predecessor-in-interest, which N-Data subsequently broke. The evidence presented to me in the instant matter does not reveal a clear promise by Motorola not to seek an injunction on the SEPs at issue and at least one court has found there was no such promise. (Id.) Commissioner Ohlhausen also criticized the Commission for failing to provide any principled basis for expanding liability beyond an unfair method of competition to include an unfair act or practice on what is essentially the same conduct here as in Bosch. (Id. at 2.) The majority responded by stating that it disagreed that it was applying its unfair methods of competition authority without regard to limiting principles, stating, our action is plainly consistent with several principles identified by Commissioner Rosch as justifying Commission action under Section 5, and citing the context of standard-setting, the existence of monopoly power, and harm to competition as limiting principles for Section 5. (Commission Stmt. at 3-4.) The majority further responded that, with respect to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, we have reason to believe that MMI [Motorola] willingly gave up its right to seek injunctive relief when it made the FRAND commitments at issue in this case. We do not believe that imposing Section 5 liability where a SEP holder violates its FRAND commitments offends the First Amendment because doing so in such circumstances simply requires those making promises to keep them. (Id. at 4-5 (quoting Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., 501 U.S. 663, (1991).) The FTC will publish a description of the consent agreement package in the Federal Register. The agreement will be subject to public comment until February 4, The Order would be in effect for 10 years and Google would be required to submit annual compliance reports. The FTC also unanimously voted to close its investigation into allegations of search bias. The FTC concluded that, the evidence presented at this time does not support the allegations that Google s display of its own vertical content at or near the top of its search results page was a product design change undertaken without a legitimate business justification. (Commission Stmt. Regarding Google s Search Practices at 3.) Similarly, we have not found sufficient evidence that Google manipulates its search algorithms to unfairly disadvantage vertical websites that compete with Google-owned vertical properties. (Id.) In a letter of commitment, Google agreed to (1) make available a web-based notice form that provides website owners with the option to opt out from display on Google s Covered Webpages of content from their website that has been crawled by Google, and (2) remove from its AdWords API Terms and Conditions the -3-
4 AdWords API Input and Copying Restrictions. The changes Google has agreed to make will ensure that consumers continue to reap the benefits of competition in the online marketplace and the market for innovative wireless devices they enjoy, said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. Sources: FTC press release, available at Opening remarks of FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, available at Decision and Order, available at Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment, available at Agreement Containing Consent Order, available at Complaint, available at Statement of the Commission, available at Separate Statement of Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, available at Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Ohlhausen, available at Statement of the Commission Regarding Google s Search Practices, available at Concurring and Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rosch Regarding Google s Search Practices, available at Statement of Commissioner Ohlhausen Regarding Google s Search Practices, available at Closing letter to Counsel for Google Inc., available at Commitment Letter from Google, Inc. to Chairman Leibowitz, available at -4-
5 USPTO Announces the Software Partnership to Enhance the Quality of Software-Related Patents In a notice published in the Federal Register on January 3, the USPTO announced that it is seeking to form a partnership with the software community to explore ways to enhance the quality of software-related patents. Members of the public are invited to participate. To commence the Software Partnership, the USPTO is sponsoring two roundtable events with identical agendas, one in Silicon Valley on February 12 from 9 a.m.-noon PST and the other in New York on February 27 from 9 a.m.-noon EST. Both programs will be webcast. The notice sets forth several topics for discussion. The first topic relates to how to improve clarity of claim boundaries that define the scope of patent protection for claims that use functional language. The second topic requests that the public identify additional topics for future discussion by the Partnership. The third topic relates to a forthcoming Request for Comments on Preparation of Patent Applications and offers an opportunity for oral presentations on the Request for Comments at the roundtable events. Registration for both roundtable events is requested by February 4. Source: Federal Register Notice, available at Nokia and RIM Enter Into New Patent License Agreement On December 21, Nokia and RIM announced that the two companies entered into a new patent license agreement that will result in settlement of all existing patent litigation between the companies and withdrawal of pending actions in the U.S., U.K., and Canada related to a recent arbitration tribunal decision finding that RIM was in breach of a long-standing license agreement for Nokia s standard-essential cellular patents. The arbitration tribunal found that RIM was not entitled to manufacture or sell wireless local area network products under the existing agreement. Nokia then filed actions in the U.S., U.K., and Canada to enforce the ruling. The financial structure of the agreement includes a one-time payment and on-going payments from RIM to Nokia. The specific terms of the agreement are confidential. Sources: Nokia Press Release, available at Bill Donahue, RIM Will License WLAN Patents To End Nokia Suits, MLex (Dec. 21, 2012), available at gy (subscription required). -5-
6 TRADE SECRETS Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act Expands Coverage to Trade Secrets Related to Services Used Internally But Not Sold On December 28, President Obama signed into law the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of The bill clarifies that the act covers trade secrets related to services as well as products and applies to services and product used internally as well as services and products sold. Specifically, the Act was amended by striking the language or included in a product that is produced for or placed in and inserting a product or service used in or intended for use in interstate commerce. The new legislation is a response to the Second Circuit s recent decision in United States v. Aleynikov, in which the court reversed the conviction of former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. programmer Sergey Aleynikov for stealing and transferring proprietary computer source code of his employer s high frequency trading system. The court held that the Economic Espionage Act applied only to trade secrets related to products a company sells. Sources: Bill, available at Ryan Davis, Trade Secrets Cases May Spike After US Strengthens Law, Law360 (Jan.2, 2013), available at gy (subscription required). Upcoming Programs How Far Can Patent Holders Go? January 15, :00-1:15 Eastern In this second program of a series of joint programs hosted by the Intellectual Property and International Committees, panelists will explore the question of how far patent holders can go in exercising their intellectual property rights, and how those limits change depending on jurisdiction. Panelists from the DOJ and private practice, including former enforcers from the KFTC and MOFCOM, will discuss issues such as refusals to license, field of use and territorial restrictions, extending the patent through post-expiration royalties, and the scope of the patent misuse doctrine under the laws of the United States, Japan, and Korea. Location: Arnold & Porter LLP 555 Twelfth St. N.W. Room 220 Washington, D.C To attend in-person, please RSVP to Deborah.Morman@aporter.com -6-
7 To participate via teleconference, please register at A special thanks to Debbie Bellinger and Ian Horkley for their weekly contributions to tidbits. -7-
DOJ Issues Favorable BRL on Proposed Revisions to IEEE s Patent Policy
In this Issue: WRITTEN BY BRENDAN J. COFFMAN AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN DOJ Issues Favorable BRL on Proposed Revisions to IEEE s Patent Policy FEBRUARY 2-7, 2015 EC to Closely Watch Proposed Revisions to
More informationFTC Approves Final Order in Google SEP Investigation, Responding to Commentators in a Separate Letter
WRITTEN BY BRENDAN J. COFFMAN AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN JULY 22-26, 2013 PATENTS FTC Approves Final Order in Google SEP Investigation, Responding to Commentators in a Separate Letter Last week, in a 2-1-1
More informationDOJ and USPTO Issue Policy Statement on Remedies for F/RAND-Encumbered SEPs
JANUARY 7-11, 2013 THIS WEEK S CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR IS DINA KALLAY EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS DOJ and USPTO Issue Policy Statement on Remedies for F/RAND-Encumbered SEPs On January 8, the DOJ
More informationAPLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions
APLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions Robert D. Fram Covington & Burling LLP Advanced Patent Law Institute Palo Alto, California December 11, 2015 1 Disclaimer The views set forth on
More informationFTC Commissioner Ohlhausen Recommends Cautious Treatment of Bosch and Google SEP Decisions
WRITTEN BY BRADLEY T. TENNIS AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN MARCH 18-22, 2013 PATENTS FTC Commissioner Ohlhausen Recommends Cautious Treatment of Bosch and Google SEP Decisions Last week, speaking at a symposium
More informationCourt in Microsoft v. Motorola Dismisses Injunctive Relief for Motorola Asserted Patents and Motorola s Entire H.264 SEP Portfolio
DECEMBER 3-7, 2012 WRITTEN BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS Court in Microsoft v. Motorola Dismisses Injunctive Relief for Motorola Asserted Patents and Motorola s Entire H.264 SEP Portfolio In Microsoft
More informationFederal Court Dismisses Claims Against NPE for Allegedly Fraudulently Enforcing Its Patents; Upholds Breach of Contract and Promissory Estoppel Claims
FEBRUARY 4-8, 2013 WRITTEN BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN PATENTS Federal Court Dismisses Claims Against NPE for Allegedly Fraudulently Enforcing Its Patents; Upholds Breach of Contract and Promissory Estoppel
More informationDistrict Court Denies Motion to Dismiss FTC Section 5 Complaint Against Qualcomm
CPI s North America Column Presents: District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss FTC Section 5 Complaint Against Qualcomm By Greg Sivinski 1 Edited by Koren Wong-Ervin August 2017 1 Early this year, the US
More informationFederal Trade Commission Closes Google Investigation
A DV I S O RY January 2013 Federal Trade Commission Closes Google Investigation On January 3, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC or the Commission ) announced the resolution of two pending investigations
More informationCourt Dismisses NPE s Group Boycott Claims Against RPX, Motorola, Samsung, and Others
THIS WEEK S CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR IS M. BRINKLEY TAPPAN EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN JANUARY 21-25, 2013 PATENTS Court Dismisses NPE s Group Boycott Claims Against RPX, Motorola, Samsung, and Others On
More informationEU Advocate General Opines That Seeking Injunctions On FRAND-Encumbered SEPs May Constitute an Abuse of Dominance
NOVEMBER 17-22, 2014 WRITTEN BY KENNETH H. MERBER EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN The views expressed in this e-bulletin are the views of the author alone. In this Issue: EU Advocate General Opines That
More informationRe: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No
The Honorable Donald S. Clark, Secretary Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No. 121-0081 Dear Secretary Clark: The
More informationAugust 6, AIPLA Comments on Partial Amendment of Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Antimonopoly Act (Draft)
Person in Charge of the Partial Amendment of the IP Guidelines (Draft) Consultation and Guidance Office, Trade Practices Division Economic Affairs Bureau, Secretariat, Japan Fair Trade Commission Section
More informationthe Patent Battleground:
The Antitrust Enforcers Charge Onto the Patent Battleground: What Technology Companies Need to Know About Standard-Related Patents, RAND Commitments, and Competition Law Presenters: Willard K. Tom John
More informationInternational Trade Daily Bulletin
International Trade Daily Bulletin VOL. 14, NO. 187 SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY This BNA Insights article by Hitomi Iwase, Tony Andriotis & Paul Dimitriadis examines the recent U.S. legal
More informationIntellectual Property Rights and Antitrust Liability in the U.S.: The 2016 Landscape. Jonathan Gleklen Yasmine Harik Arnold & Porter LLP
Intellectual Property Rights and Antitrust Liability in the U.S.: The 2016 Landscape Jonathan Gleklen Yasmine Harik Arnold & Porter LLP June 2016 Perhaps the most fundamental question that arises at the
More informationFederal Circuit Provides Guidance on Methodologies for Calculating FRAND Royalty Rates, Vacating the Jury Award in Ericsson v.
In this Issue: WRITTEN BY COURTNEY J. ARMOUR AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN The views expressed in this e-bulletin are the views of the authors alone. DECEMBER 1-6, 2014 Federal
More informationThe New IP Antitrust Licensing Guidelines' Silence On SEPs
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The New IP Antitrust Licensing Guidelines'
More informationFRAND or Foe: Litigating Standard Essential Patents
FRAND or Foe: Litigating Standard Essential Patents Munich Seminar May 2013 Munich, Germany Christopher Dillon (Dillon@fr.com) Jan Malte Schley (Schley@fr.com) Brian Wells (wells@fr.com) Presentation Overview
More informationLaw in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents Hosted by: Methodological Overview of FRAND Rate Determination
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. THIRD PARTY UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION S STATEMENT ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT CONSOLES, RELATED SOFTWARE, AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Inv. No. 337-TA-752 THIRD PARTY UNITED
More informationCourt Approves 24.3 Million in Attorneys' Fees in Pay-For- Delay Litigation
WRITTEN BY SHYLAH R. ALFONSO AND LOGAN BREED JUNE 30 -JULY 6, 2014 PATENTS Court Approves 24.3 Million in Attorneys' Fees in Pay-For- Delay Litigation On June 30, a federal judge in Tennessee issued an
More informationAIPLA Comments on the JPO Guide on Licensing Negotiations Involving Standard Essential Patents of March 9, 2018.
VIA EMAIL: PA0A00@jpo.go.jp Legislative Affairs Office General Coordination Division Policy Planning and Coordination Department Japan Patent Office 3-4-3 Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-8915, Japan
More informationAntitrust and Intellectual Property
and Intellectual Property July 22, 2016 Rob Kidwell, Member Antitrust Prohibitions vs IP Protections The Challenge Harmonizing U.S. antitrust laws that sanction the illegal use of monopoly/market power
More informationAntitrust IP Competition Perspectives
Antitrust IP Competition Perspectives Dr. Dina Kallay Counsel for IP and Int l Antitrust Federal Trade Commission The 6 th Annual Session of the UNECE Team of I.P. Specialists June 21, 2012 The views expressed
More informationAIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October Licenses in European Patent Litigation
AIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October 2014 Licenses in European Patent Litigation Dr Jochen Bühling, Attorney-at-law/Partner, Krieger Mes & Graf v. Groeben Olivier Nicolle, French and European
More informationPublished by. Yearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Standard-essential patent monetisation and enforcement. Vringo, Inc David L Cohen
Published by Yearbook 2016 Building IP value in the 21st century Standard-essential patent monetisation and enforcement Vringo, Inc David L Cohen Vringo, Inc Monetisation and strategy X X Standard-essential
More informationRAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust
RAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust American Intellectual Property Law Association IP Practice in Japan Committee October 2009, Washington, DC JOHN A. O BRIEN LAW
More informationANSI s Submission to the Global Standards Collaboration GSC-18 IPRWG Meeting. April 20, 2015
ANSI s Submission to the Global Standards Collaboration GSC-18 IPRWG Meeting April 20, 2015 Patricia Griffin, VP and General Counsel ANSI GSC_IPR(15)01_006 Details of This Contribution Document No: Source:
More informationMultimedia over Coax Alliance Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy
Multimedia over Coax Alliance Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy 1. BACKGROUND The Alliance has been formed as a non-profit mutual benefit corporation for the purpose of developing and promoting
More informationLatest Developments On Injunctive Relief For Infringement Of FRAND-Encumbered SEPs
August 7, 2013 Latest Developments On Injunctive Relief For Infringement Of FRAND-Encumbered SEPs This memorandum is directed to the current state of the case law in the U.S. International Trade Commission
More informationNTT DOCOMO Technical Journal. Akimichi Tanabe Takuya Asaoka Katsunori Tsunoda Makoto Kijima. 1. Introduction
Essential Patent Rights Exercise Restriction NPE 1. Introduction Recent growth in patent transactions has been accompanied by increasing numbers of patent disputes, especially in the field of information
More informationCase5:12-cv RMW Document41 Filed10/10/12 Page1 of 10
Case:-cv-0-RMW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 E-FILED on 0/0/ 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff,
More informationReproduced from Statutes of the Republic of Korea Copyright C 1997 by the Korea Legislation Research Institute, Seoul, Korea PATENT ACT
Reproduced from Statutes of the Republic of Korea Copyright C 1997 by the Korea Legislation Research Institute, Seoul, Korea PATENT ACT Note: The Acts and subordinate statutes translated into English herein
More informationAssistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim Signals Shift in Antitrust/IP Focus
Antitrust Alert December 4, 2017 Key Points Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Makan Delrahim, the new head of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), recently announced a shift from the
More informationVSO Policies and Procedures. Sept 1, 2015 Revision 2.8
VSO Policies and Procedures Sept 1, 2015 Revision 2.8 VITA STANDARDS ORGANIZATION - POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Changing this document... 1 1.2 References... 1 1.3 Electronic Communications...
More informationPatents, Standards and Antitrust: An Introduction
Patents, Standards and Antitrust: An Introduction Mark H. Webbink Senior Lecturing Fellow Duke University School of Law Nature of standards, standards setting organizations, and their intellectual property
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle September 2015 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle September 2015 (1) The Evolution of U.S. Antitrust Agencies Approach to Standards and Standard Essential Patents: From Enforcement to Advocacy James F. Rill Baker Botts L.L.P. www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationSOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into as of the Date (the Effective Date ) by and between Customer Name having its principal office at Customer address ( Licensee
More informationFTC Orders Compulsory IP Licensing to Remedy Competitive Concerns in Honeywell/Intermec Transaction
SEPTEMBER 8-15, 2013 WRITTEN BY MAC CONFORTI AND LOGAN BREED MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS FTC Orders Compulsory IP Licensing to Remedy Competitive Concerns in Honeywell/Intermec Transaction The FTC required
More informationInjunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents
Litigation Webinar Series: INSIGHTS Our take on litigation and trial developments across the U.S. Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents David Healey Sr. Principal, Fish & Richardson Houston,
More informationPatents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection
The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection November 2017 John J. O Malley Ryan W. O Donnell vklaw.com 1 Patents vklaw.com 2 What is a Patent? A right to exclude others from making, using,
More informationDirect Phone Number: Last Name: Title: Alliance Primary Contact (if different than authorized signatory contact): First Name:
Thank you for your interest in the CommonWell Health Alliance. To help us process your membership application, please complete the below information along with your signed Membership agreement, which requires
More informationFORUM OF INCIDENT RESPONSE AND SECURITY TEAMS, INC. UNIFORM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ( UNIFORM IPR ) POLICY
FORUM OF INCIDENT RESPONSE AND SECURITY TEAMS, INC. UNIFORM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ( UNIFORM IPR ) POLICY 1. The Purpose of this Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the terms under which the organization
More informationUnderstanding and Applying the CREATE Act in Collaborations
Page 1 Understanding and Applying the CREATE Act in Collaborations, is an assistant professor at Emory University School of Law in Atlanta, Georgia. The Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement
More informationDAY ONE: Monday, February 26, 2018
7:30 8:30 Breakfast & Registration 8:30 8:45 Welcome and Introductions (Cooper, Rea, Weinlein) 8:45 10:00 [Panel 1 (or Keynotes)] Legislative And Administrative Efforts To Make United States Patent Protection
More informationSpeaker and Panelists 7/17/2013. The Honorable James L. Robart. Featured Speaker: Panelists: Moderator:
Updates in Determining RAND for Standards Essential Patents: Featuring The Honorable James L. Robart July 12, 2013 Washington State Patent Law Association IP Committee of the Federal Bar Association for
More informationCOLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AGREEMENT AND ALLOCATION OF RIGHTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UNDER AN STTR RESEARCH PROJECT between. and
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AGREEMENT AND ALLOCATION OF RIGHTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UNDER AN STTR RESEARCH PROJECT between and MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY This Agreement between (hereinafter Company ),
More informationOverview of Developments in Telecoms Patent Litigation
Fordham IP Conference April 2012 Overview of Developments in Telecoms Patent Litigation Ari Laakkonen Powell Gilbert LLP Health Warning: My comments reflect my personal opinions. 1992 Analogue phones were
More informationAIPLA Comments on Questionnaire on IP Misuse Antitrust Guidelines
October 14, 2015 2015 10 14 Mr. Liu Jian Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Bureau National Development and Reform Commission People s Republic of China Re: AIPLA Comments on Questionnaire on IP Misuse
More informationANSI Legal Issues Forum Washington, D.C. October 12, 2006 Antitrust Update
ANSI Legal Issues Forum Washington, D.C. October 12, 2006 Antitrust Update Richard S. Taffet Bingham McCutchen LLP (212) 705-7729 richard.taffet@bingham.com Gil Ohana Cisco Systems, Inc. (408) 525-2853
More informationAccellera Systems Initiative Intellectual Property Rights Policy
Accellera Systems Initiative Intellectual Property Rights Policy 1. Definitions The following terms, when capitalized, have the following meanings: "Accepted Letter of Assurance" shall mean a Letter of
More informationDecade History and Future Prospects of Intellectual Property High Court Chief Judge of the Intellectual Property High Court Shitara, Ryuichi
Decade History and Future Prospects of Intellectual Property High Court Chief Judge of the Intellectual Property High Court Shitara, Ryuichi I Introduction Since the Intellectual Property High Court (herein
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz J. Thomas Rosch COMPLAINT
0510094 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: William E. Kovacic, Chairman Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz J. Thomas Rosch In the Matter of NEGOTIATED DATA SOLUTIONS
More informationMATERIALS TRANSFER AND EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT. Carnegie Mellon University
MATERIALS TRANSFER AND EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT Carnegie Mellon University This Agreement (hereinafter this Agreement ) is made and entered into this day of, ( Effective Date ) by and between Carnegie
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN 3G MOBILE HANDSETS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Inv. No. 337-TA-613 (REMAND) REPLY OF J. GREGORY SIDAK, CHAIRMAN, CRITERION
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (1) Carte Blanche for SSOs? The Antitrust Division s Business Review Letter on the IEEE s Patent Policy Update Stuart M. Chemtob Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationKorean Intellectual Property Office
www.kipo.go.kr 2007 Korean Intellectual Property Office INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 2007 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 2007 PATENT ACT 1 UTILITY MODEL ACT 127
More informationStrategic Partner Agreement Terms
Strategic Partner Agreement Terms Why is this important? The Strategic Partner Agreement Terms are important because they describe the terms and conditions of the referral partnership relationship that
More informationCase5:11-cv LHK Document1901 Filed08/21/12 Page1 of 109
Case:-cv-0-LHK Document0 Filed0// Page of 0 0 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
More informationCase 1:13-cv RGA Document 17 Filed 02/11/13 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 227 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:13-cv-00008-RGA Document 17 Filed 02/11/13 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 227 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
More informationRecent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea
Recent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea AIPPI Forum 2007 Session I October 5, 2007 Raffles City Convention Center, Singapore Casey Kook-Chan An Statutory Regime for IP Protection AIPPI-KOREA Statutory
More informationWIRELESS INNOVATION FORUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY. As approved on 10 November, 2016
WInnForum Policy On Intellectual Property Rights: WINNF Policy 007 1. IPR Generally 1.1 Purpose WIRELESS INNOVATION FORUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY As approved on 10 November, 2016 The Software
More informationIMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY.
Western Digital End User License Agreement IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY. SECTION 8 OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS A BINDING ARBITRATION PROVISION THAT REQUIRES THE RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS,
More informationRespecting Patent Rights: Model Behavior for Patent Owners
IPO LITIGATION PRINCIPLES TASK FORCE: WHITE PAPER Revised: 03/06/2007 Part I. Introduction 2007 Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) Disclaimer: This paper is presented for discussion purposes
More informationClarifying Competition Law: Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and EU/U.S. Competition/Antitrust Law. Robert S. K.
Clarifying Competition Law: Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and EU/U.S. Competition/Antitrust Law Robert S. K. Bell Arindam Kar Speakers Robert S. K. Bell Partner Bryan Cave London T: +44
More informationHigh-Tech Patent Issues
August 6, 2012 High-Tech Patent Issues On June 4, 2013, the White House Task Force on High-Tech Patent Issues released its Legislative Priorities & Executive Actions, designed to protect innovators in
More informationCORE TECHNOLOGIES CONSULTING, LLC UNLIMITED OEM SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
CORE TECHNOLOGIES CONSULTING, LLC UNLIMITED OEM SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT ATTENTION: PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU INSTALL, COPY, DOWNLOAD OR USE THIS SOFTWARE ACCOMPANYING THIS PACKAGE.
More informationKHRONOS GROUP MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
KHRONOS GROUP MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS This agreement enables a company, academic institution, or government institution to join the Khronos Group PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY: THIS
More informationPatents and Standards The American Picture. Judge Randall R. Rader U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Patents and Standards The American Picture Judge Randall R. Rader U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Roadmap Introduction Cases Conclusions Questions An Economist s View Terminologies: patent
More informationTHE TROUBLING USE OF ANTITRUST TO REGULATE FRAND LICENSING
THE TROUBLING USE OF ANTITRUST TO REGULATE FRAND LICENSING Douglas H. Ginsburg George Mason University School of Law Koren W. Wong-Ervin George Mason University School of Law Joshua D. Wright George Mason
More informationConcurring and Dissenting Statement of Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch Regarding Google s Search Practices
Concurring and Dissenting Statement of Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch Regarding Google s Search Practices In the Matter of Google Inc., FTC File No. 111-0163 January 3, 2012 The Commission has voted to close
More informationANSI Report on U.S. Activities Related to IPR and Standards
Reference: GSC_IPR(15)01_007 Document Title: Source: Contact: GSC Session: Agenda Item: ANSI Report on U.S. Activities Related to IPR and Standards American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Patricia
More informationRecent Decisions Provide Some Clarity on How Courts and Government Agencies Will Likely Resolve Issues Involving Standard-Essential Patents
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 4 9-1-2013 Recent Decisions Provide Some Clarity on How Courts and Government Agencies Will Likely Resolve Issues Involving Standard-Essential
More informationSUMMIT LAW GROUP PLLC 315 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Telephone: (206) Fax: (206)
The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 1 1 1 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff, MOTOROLA, INC., and MOTOROLA
More informationWIPO Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) For FRAND Disputes Workshop
WIPO Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) For FRAND Disputes Workshop organized by WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center in cooperation with European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) Sophia
More informationFTC AND DOJ ISSUE JOINT REPORT REGARDING ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
OF INTEREST FTC AND DOJ ISSUE JOINT REPORT REGARDING ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Interesting and difficult questions lie at the intersection of intellectual property rights and
More informationTechnology and IP Forum: Current global issues in SEP licensing, enforcement, and disputes December 4, 2018
Technology and IP Forum: Current global issues in SEP licensing, enforcement, and disputes December 4, 2018 Agenda Introduction to Standards, SEPs, and FRAND licensing Regional consideration and opportunities
More informationEnd User License Agreement (EULA) Savision Inc. 2017
End User License Agreement (EULA) Savision Inc. 2017 Contents 1. Definitions... 4 2. License Grant and Restrictions... 5 3. License Fee... 6 4. Intellectual Property Rights and Confidential Information...
More informationAntitrust Enforcement Under President Obama: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Stacey Anne Mahoney *
DISCLAIMER: This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express
More informationCA/BROWSER FORUM Intellectual Property Rights Policy, v. 1.3 (Effective July 3, 2018)
CA/BROWSER FORUM Intellectual Property Rights Policy, v. 1.3 (Effective July 3, 2018) DEFINITIONS 1. Overview This Intellectual Property Rights Policy describes: a. licensing goals for CA/Browser Forum
More informationOPEN COMPUTE PROJECT SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR INITIATIVE (PLEASE PROVIDE NAME OF GENERAL INITIATIVE HERE) AS OF NOVEMBER 5, 2018
OPEN COMPUTE PROJECT SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR INITIATIVE (PLEASE PROVIDE NAME OF GENERAL INITIATIVE HERE) AS OF NOVEMBER 5, 2018 This Specification Development Agreement for the initiative
More informationPharmaceutical Patent Settlement Cases: Mixed Signals for Settling Patent Litigation
By Margaret J. Simpson Tel: 312 923-2857 Fax: 312 840-7257 E-mail: msimpson@jenner.com The following article originally appeared in the Spring 2004 issue of the Illinois State Bar Association s Antitrust
More informationFIDO Alliance. Membership Agreement
1 2 3 4 5 6 FIDO Alliance 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 FIDO Alliance Inc. is a California incorporated non-profit mutual benefit corporation. Effective Date: October 7, 2015 Page 1 of 36 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
More informationInter Partes Review: At the Intersection of the USPTO and District Court
Inter Partes Review: At the Intersection of the USPTO and District Court Barbara A. Fiacco Duke Law Patent Institute May 14, 2013 Inter Partes Review 1 Overview Background: IPR by the numbers Standing/Privity
More informationIEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Patent Policy
IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Patent Policy Patent Policy Review at IEEE-SA David Law IEEE-SA PatCom Chair 14 th July 2014 Outline 1. Impetus for the current review 2. Highlights of proposed modifications
More informationDrafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes Negotiating Exhaustion of Infringing Materials, Restrictions on Future Trademark
More informationHuawei v ZTE No More Need To Look At The Orange Book In SEP Disputes
1 Huawei v ZTE No More Need To Look At The Orange Book In SEP Disputes By James Killick & Stratigoula Sakellariou 1 (White & Case) September 2015 Industry standards are crucial for economic development
More informationFREEVIEW RETAILER TRADE MARK LICENCE (PRODUCTS, PC PRODUCTS and FREEVIEW COMPATIBLE PCs) THIS LICENCE dated is made BETWEEN:
FREEVIEW RETAILER TRADE MARK LICENCE (PRODUCTS, PC PRODUCTS and FREEVIEW COMPATIBLE PCs) THIS LICENCE dated is made BETWEEN: a company incorporated under the laws of with company registration no. whose
More informationAntitrust Regulation of IPRs China s First Proposal
Competition Policy International Antitrust Regulation of IPRs China s First Proposal Adrian Emch (Hogan Lovells) & Liyang Hou (KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) 1 1 Introduction On June
More informationYOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT, DO NOT CLICK ON THE BUY NOW->>
TERMS AND CONDITIONS IMPORTANT READ CAREFULLY: These Terms and Conditions for Virus Eraser Products and Services ( Agreement ) is a legal agreement between you (either an individual or an entity) and Virus
More informationLICENSE AGREEMENT. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
LICENSE AGREEMENT This License Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between the Wireless Application Protocol Forum Ltd. ( WAP Forum ) and You. In consideration of the covenants set
More informationTOBII PRO SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT KIT LICENSE AGREEMENT
TOBII PRO SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT KIT LICENSE AGREEMENT Document version 1.1 PREAMBLE This Tobii Pro Software Development Kit License Agreement (the "Agreement") forms a legally binding contract between Tobii
More informationTHE FUTURE OF STANDARD SETTING
THE FUTURE OF STANDARD SETTING CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY S SIXTH ANNUAL FALL CONFERENCE OCTOBER 11-12, 2018 Richard S. Taffet 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Diverse Approaches
More informationCity State Country Zip. Contact Name Telephone Fax
UNIFIED EFI FORUM, INC. CONTRIBUTORS AGREEMENT This Unified EFI Forum, Inc. ( Forum ) Contributors Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into by and between the Forum and the party set forth below and its
More informationCase 2:10-cv DF Document 1 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-00335-DF Document 1 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Patent Group LLC, Relator v. Civil Action No. 2:10cv335
More informationStandard Essential Patent License under the FRAND Commitment
Standard Essential Patent License under the FRAND Commitment Steve Wang Inc. September 8, 2017 1 A General Review of the FRAND Commitment The origin of the FRAND obligation lies in the IPR policy documents
More informationWIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER
WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER Dispute Resolution for the 21 st Century http://www.wipo.int/amc The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Based in Geneva, Switzerland, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation
More informationInternational Arbitration of Patent Disputes. M. Scott Donahey Arbitrator and Mediator Palo Alto
International Arbitration of Patent Disputes M. Scott Donahey Arbitrator and Mediator Palo Alto adr@scottdonahey.com; www.scottdonahey.com Reasons to Arbitrate Patent Disputes Cost of Litigation Litigation
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY
Las Vegas Convention Center Las Vegas, Nevada Exhibit Days: October 31 November 3, 2017 Education Days: October 30 November 3, 2017 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY SEMA maintains a strict policy on
More information