ACS NATIONAL CONVENTION STUDENT PANEL ON THE DEATH PENALTY THURSDAY, JULY 26 TH, 2007
|
|
- Osborne Jordan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ACS NATIONAL CONVENTION STUDENT PANEL ON THE DEATH PENALTY THURSDAY, JULY 26 TH, 2007 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT, CRUELTY AND THE CONSTITUTION: CURRENT ISSUES IN THE AMERICAN DEATH PENALTY MEMORANDUM BY: COURTNEY LORDS (UNIVERSITY OF OREGON SCHOOL OF LAW) CLINT MILLER (SEATTLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW) FRED SMITH (STANFORD LAW SCHOOL) INTRODUCTION The use of the death penalty as a form of criminal punishment in the United States remains a controversial subject. The death penalty has been in use from the early colonial days. 1 In 1963, Justice Goldberg, joined by Justices Douglas and Brennan, wrote a dissent in Rudolph v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 889 (1963), a rape case in which the defendant was sentenced to death, that challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty that inspired litigants to begin filing lawsuits challenging the death penalty. By 1967, states had halted their executions, creating a de facto national moratorium on death penalty sentencing. The death penalty thus has been in use as a punishment except for the brief period from 1967 to the mid-1970s when the Supreme Court struck down most states statutes (discussed in detail, below). Almost immediately, many states then rewrote their statutes to address the Court s concerns about the arbitrariness of application, and in the late 1970s some states began using the death penalty again. Today, 38 states, including New York, have death penalty statutes, while 12 states and the District of Columbia do not. In 2004, New York s death penalty statute was declared unconstitutional; the state has not executed anyone since the national moratorium ended in Three other states with death penalty statutes New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Kansas also have not executed anyone since the moratorium. Overall, the use of the death penalty appears to be diminishing once again, this time state by state. While a strong majority of those polled continue to support its use, that support is not as robust as it was even a decade ago. A May 2006 Gallup Poll found that overall support of the death penalty was 65%, down from 80% in FORMS OF EXECUTION The electric chair was introduced as a means of execution at the end of the nineteenth century by New York, which conducted its first execution in this manner in In 1924, the use of cyanide gas was introduced as Nevada sought a more humane way of executing those convicted of capital crimes 2 Thirty-seven of the thirty-eight states that now allow capital punishment use 1 From 2 (Bohm, 1999).
2 lethal injection as the primary method for execution 3 perhaps because the public believes it to be the most humane form of execution (Nebraska continues to use only electrocution as its method of execution). See Hill v. McDonough, 126 S. Ct (U.S. 2006). For instance, since 1976, 917 executions have occurred through lethal injection, while 153 executions occurred through electrocution. Electrocution used to be the favored method of execution but it has only been used four times in the last five years. The gas chamber has been used eleven times since 1976, while there are only three incidences of hangings. Other than Gary Gilmore s execution, death by firing squad has been utilized only one other time in the last thirty years, also in Utah, in WHO IS EXECUTED IN THIS COUNTRY? As of January 2007, there are 3,350 people on death row in this country. 4 The three states with the most people on death row are California (660), Florida (397), and Texas (393). Of the 3,350 inmates on death row, 45% are white, 42% are black, and 11% are Hispanic. Since 1976, 57% of those executed were white, 34% were black, and 7% were Hispanic. There were 50 women on death row as of June 7, 2007, equating to 1.7% of the total death row population. 5 Eleven women have been executed since RACIAL DISPARITY IN APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IS WIDELY ACKNOWLEDGED Since the death penalty s reinstatement, courts and scholars have wrestled with the death penalties racially disparate application where more people are sentenced to death in cases involving white victims than in cases involving black victims. Most notably, in McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987), the United States Supreme Court confronted evidence that in Georgia, the death penalty was assessed in 22% of the cases involving black defendants and white victims; 8% of the cases involving white defendants and white victims; 1% of the cases involving black defendants and black victims; and 3% of the cases involving white defendants and black victims. Id. at 286. Professors David C. Baldus, Charles Pulaski, and George Woodworth compiled these statistics in a paper often referred to in shorthand as the Baldus Study. 7 Relying on this evidence, McCleskey argued that this disparity violated the Fourteenth Amendment s equal protection clause, as well as the Eighth Amendment s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The Court rejected both claims in a 5-4 decision. Justice Powell, writing for the majority found the evidence presented by McCleskey failed to demonstrate which actors in the criminal justice system were responsible for the disparity. As a result, the Petitioner s could not prove which actors, if any, acted with a racially discriminatory intent. Further, the court rejected the Eight 3 Death Penalty Information Center, History of the Death Penalty: Part I Death Penalty Information Center, (last visited June 24, 2006). 4 Source: NAACP LDF Death Row, U.S.A. (January 1, 2007) 5 "Death Penalty For Female Offenders" by Victor L. Streib, (June 7, 2007) 6 Id. 7 David Baldus, George Woodworth & Charles A. Pulaski, Jr., Comparative Review of Death Sentences: An Empirical Study of the Georgia Experience, 74 J. Crim. L. & C. 661 (1983). 2
3 Amendment challenge because McCleskey's death sentence was not disproportionate to other death sentences imposed in the State. Id. at Four justices, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, and Stevens, would have found in favor of McCleskey on both claims. McCleskey, they noted, demonstrated that few of the details of the crime or of [his] past criminal conduct were more important than the fact that his victim was white. Id. at 326. The dissenting justices marshaled statistical evidence from the Baldus Study to support this claim. IS THE DEATH PENALTY AN EFFECTIVE DETERRENT? Whether the death penalty deters crime remains in dispute despite studies finding that it does not function as an effective deterrent. Studies comparing the number of murders and the number of executions in states with the death penalty show that these states have a higher murder rate than their counterparts without the death penalty. 8 In 1999, the average murder rate among death penalty states was 5.5 murders per 100,000 people. In the same year, the average murder rate among non-death-penalty states was IS THE DEATH PENALTY CRUEL AND UNUSUAL UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT? Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. U.S. Const. am. VIII. Does the death penalty violate the Eighth Amendment s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment? The Supreme Court has ruled on the death penalty many times, but these cases have not resolved the ongoing conflict over death as a punishment. In 1972, the United States Supreme Court s landmark 5-4 per curiam decision in Furman v. Georgia overturned the use of the death penalty in a set of consolidated rape and murder cases. Each justice in the majority wrote his own concurrence. The Fourteenth Amendment appears to have provided the constitutional basis for the Furman court s convoluted 5-4 ruling. Only Justices Blackmun and Marshall agreed that the Eighth Amendment prohibited capital punishment for all crimes under all circumstances. Justices Stewart and White concluded that petitioners death sentences must be set aside because prevailing sentencing practices did not then comply with the Eighth Amendment. The majority s fifth vote, cast by Justice Douglas, was based on the Fourteenth Amendment alone. In Furman, the Court determined that most states statutes were pregnant with discrimination and discrimination is an ingredient not compatible with the idea of equal protection of the laws that is implicit in the ban on cruel and unusual punishments. 10 The result of Furman was invalidation of most applicable states statutes and temporarily (as it turned out) halting executions in the United States as a form of criminal penalty. 11 In the 8 From 9 Id. 10 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 257 (1972). 11 Id. 3
4 following years, however, 35 states revised their statutes and actively reinstated the death penalty for at least some types of crime. 12 In 1976, the death penalty was revived when the Supreme Court upheld death penalty statutes in Florida, Georgia, and Texas, ruling that the death penalty was constitutional under the Eighth Amendment. 13 Whether the death penalty by its very nature constitutes cruel and unusual punishment has not been squarely addressed directly by the United States Supreme Court. The Court appears to have disregarded opportunities to decide cases based on the Eighth Amendment. In In re Kemmler, for example, although the Court refused to address the meaning of the Eighth Amendment, it notably held that the Fourteenth Amendment s due process guarantee in the administration of criminal justice, requires that no different or higher punishment shall be imposed upon one than is imposed upon all for like offenses. 14 The Supreme Court has apparently struggled with the definition of cruel and unusual punishment; not only has it rarely used the Eighth Amendment s proscription in deciding cases, but it also has not yet declared a meaningful test for its application. Even before Furman, some argued that the Supreme Court s opinions under the cruel and unusual punishment clause have suggested not only the evolving standards of decency formula, but also a more purposive approach that takes into account nothing less than the dignity of man. 15 In protecting such a fundamental value something that was a significant part of philosophical and political discourse during the mid-eighteenth century when the Constitution was being written the Court has interpreted the clause to forbid punishments which are degrading in their severity and wantonly imposed. 16 SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST EXECUTION OF THE MENTALLY RETARDED, THE MENTALLY ILL AND JUVENILES? The Court has narrowed the application of the death penalty by finding it inappropriate in cases involving juveniles, the mentally retarded, and the mentally ill. Within the past five years, litigants have successfully challenged the practice of executing mentally retarded persons, mentally ill persons, and juveniles. 17 These challenges differ from the other death penalty cases because defendants did not broadly challenge whether states may execute inmates at all, but instead focused on particularly vulnerable classes of persons. In Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), the Court ruled that the execution of mentally retarded defendants violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), the Court ruled that imposition death penalty for those who had committed their crimes under 18 years of age was cruel and unusual punishment. When the Court endorsed these arguments, it relied primarily on two factors. First, public polling data showed that executing such persons 12 Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 583, (1977). 13 Coker, 433 U.S. at 594 (stating the Supreme Court s holding in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)). 14 In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. at Arthur J. Goldberg and Alan M. Dershowitz, Declaring the Death Penalty Unconstitutional, 83 Harv. L. Rev. 1773, 1784 (1970). 16 Id. at Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) (involving a mentally retarded defendant); Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) (addressing a juvenile s claim). 4
5 offends contemporary evolving standards of decency. Second, in both instances the court observed that numerous states over the past two decades have banned executions of mentally retarded persons and juveniles. This year in Panetti v. Quarterman, 127 S. Ct. 2842, 2862 (2007), the Supreme Court clarified that an individual s delusions may render him incompetent for execution. The Court held that a prisoner s mere awareness of the State s link between his crime and the punishment to be inflicted cannot be a strict test for competency if the prisoner s delusions put the link in a context so far removed from reality that the punishment can serve no proper purpose. Id. The consistency and direction of these changes by states further indicate that executing such inmates is cruel and unusual under evolving contemporary standards. AN OPEN QUESTION: IS LETHAL INJECTION CRUEL AND UNUSUAL AS A METHOD OF EXECUTION? While the Supreme Court has not yet addressed when, if ever, the execution method of lethal injection amounts to cruel and unusual punishment, lower courts have. A lower court in California, for example, has temporarily halted all lethal injections in the nation s most populous state, pending further review of the state s execution methods. Morales v. Tilton, 465 F. Supp. 2d 972 (N.D. Cal. 2006). The district court showed particular concern about the lack of involvement by medical professionals in administering lethal injections, as well as the use of a drug called pancuronium bromide, which litigants contend hides rather than dulls the pain experienced by persons subjected to lethal injection using this formulary. Over the past year, courts have also temporarily halted lethal injection protocols in Arkansas, Missouri, and Tennessee, though the relevant courts of appeals have very recently reversed the lower court decisions in each of these cases. See Nooner v. Norris, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS (8th Cir. Ark. July 9, 2007); Taylor v. Crawford, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS (8th Cir. Mo. June 4, 2007); Workman v. Bredesen, 486 F.3d 896 (6th. Cir. Tenn. May 7, 2007) (Sutton, J.). CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT Also worth noting is a developing line of cases finding that the public has a First Amendment right to know how executions are administered. Courts have observed that the public generally, and the press specifically, cannot serve their proper government watchdog function if the state obstructs their ability to learn about, and in some cases witness, executions. In California First Amendment Coalition v. Woodford, 299 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2002), for example, the Ninth Circuit rejected the state s use of a large curtain during executions, which blocked the press s ability to see executioners prepare inmates for death. The court found that the procedure restricts the public s First Amendment right to view executions from the moment the condemned is escorted into the execution chamber. Pending litigation in California relies on this principle to challenge the use of pancuronium bromide ( Pavulon ) during executions, a paralytic chemical that apparently serves only one function: to mask inmates expressions of pain. Pacific News Service v. Tilton (N.D. Cal. 2006); but see Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292 (Tenn. 2005) (rejecting a challenge to the drug where defendant alleged that it violated the Eighth Amendment because it served no legitimate purpose). 5
6 DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. What are the appropriate roles of the three branches of government on this issue? The federal government versus state governments? 2. The death penalty has been abandoned by virtually all democratic, industrialized nations except for the United States. Should this fact be persuasive in determining our national course of action? 3. Is the imposition of the death penalty a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment s due process protection when it is imposed in some states, but not in others? When it is imposed on an individual for committing a single rape or murder, but not on a serial murderer who confessed to killing 48 women? 4. Is the Supreme Court s current definition of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment cohesive? What other factors or elements should be included or excluded? 5. If the Supreme Court declines to rule the death penalty unconstitutional, should certain forms of execution be prohibited? What evidence supports your argument? 6. Statistics demonstrate that the use of the death penalty in this country disfavors African- Americans, especially if they are convicted of committing a crime against a white person. How should that be addressed? 7. Is the death penalty an effective deterrent against the commission of crimes for which this penalty may be imposed? Does it serve a valuable retributive purpose in providing relief to victims families? RECOMMENDED READING GENERAL: Death Penalty Information Center, LETHAL INJECTION: Weinstein, Harry and Dolan, Maura "The Chaos Behind California Executions" Los Angeles Times (October 2, 2006) Guidry, Orin "Message From the President: Observations Regarding Lethal Injection" American Society of Anesthesiologists (June 30, 2006) Denise Grady, "Doctors See Way to Cut Suffering in Executions." The New York Times (June 23, 2006) 6
7 ARBITRARINESS AND RACE: Herbert, Bob, "Who Gets the Death Penalty?" New York Times, May 13, Bright, Taylor and Phillips, Jeb, "Execution of Justice" Birmingham Post-Herald, December 14-18, "Deadly Disparities" The New York Times, September 17, 2000 (editorial). Bonner, Raymond and Lacey, Marc, "Pervasive Disparities Found in the Federal Death Penalty" New York Times, September 12, CONSTITUTIONALITY Ledewitz, Bruce: "Could the death penalty be a cruel punishment?"; 3 Widener Journal of Public Law 121 (1993) Steiker, Carol and Steiker, Jordan: "Sober second thoughts: reflections on two decades of constitutional regulation of capital punishment"; 109 Harvard Law Review 355 (1995) Bader Aldave, Barbara, "Forward: The Future of Capital Punishment in the United States," 81 Oregon Law Review 1 (2002) Denno, Deborah W.: "Getting to death: Are executions constitutional?"; 82 Iowa Law Review 319 (1997) Harding, Roberta M.: "The gallows to the gurney: analyzing the (un)constitutionality of the methods of execution"; 6 The Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 153 (1996) 7
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 536 U. S. (2002) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 01 488 TIMOTHY STUART RING, PETITIONER v. ARIZONA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA [June 24, 2002] JUSTICE BREYER,
More informationNC Death Penalty: History & Overview
TAB 01: NC Death Penalty: History & Overview The Death Penalty in North Carolina: History and Overview Jeff Welty April 2012, revised April 2017 This paper provides a brief history of the death penalty
More informationCRAFTING THE CASE AGAINST THE AMERICAN DEATH PENALTY
CRAFTING THE CASE AGAINST THE AMERICAN DEATH PENALTY PATRICK MULVANEY* Just a decade ago, crafting the case against the American death penalty might have seemed a quixotic exercise. Nationwide, there were
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2007 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationFifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights
You do not need your computers today. Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights How have the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments' rights of the accused been incorporated as a right of all American citizens?
More informationCritique of the Juvenile Death Penalty in the United States: A Global Perspective
Duquesne University Law Review, Winter, 2004 version 6 By: Lori Edwards Critique of the Juvenile Death Penalty in the United States: A Global Perspective I. Introduction 1. Since 1990, only seven countries
More information8th and 9th Amendments. Joseph Bu, Jalynne Li, Courtney Musmann, Perah Ralin, Celia Zeiger Period 1
8th and 9th Amendments Joseph Bu, Jalynne Li, Courtney Musmann, Perah Ralin, Celia Zeiger Period 1 8th Amendment Cruel and Unusual Punishment Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
More informationCase 5:06-cr TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH
Case 5:06-cr-00019-TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06 CR-00019-R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF
More informationShould Capital Punishment Receive A Death Sentence? Capital punishment is one of the most controversial and polarizing topics that
Travers 1 David Travers Professor Jordan Law 17 11 December 2013 Should Capital Punishment Receive A Death Sentence? Capital punishment is one of the most controversial and polarizing topics that exists
More informationChapter 12 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear
Chapter 12 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear CHAPTER OBJECTIVES 12.1 Outline the history of capital punishment in the United States. 12.2 Explain the legal provisions
More informationCHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.
CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE I. Introduction II. Sentencing Rationales A. Retribution B. Deterrence C. Rehabilitation D. Restoration E. Incapacitation III. Imposing Criminal Sanctions
More informationCalifornia holds a special distinction in regards to the practice of capital punishment.
The State of California s System of Capital Punishment Stacy L. Mallicoat Division of Politics, Administration and Justice California State University, Fullerton While many states around the nation are
More informationONE WAY OR ANOTHER THE DEATH PENALTY WILL BE ABOLISHED, BUT ONLY AFTER THE PUBLIC NO LONGER HAS CONFIDENCE IN ITS USE
ONE WAY OR ANOTHER THE DEATH PENALTY WILL BE ABOLISHED, BUT ONLY AFTER THE PUBLIC NO LONGER HAS CONFIDENCE IN ITS USE JAMES E. COLEMAN* There are current indicators that the death penalty is losing much
More informationSCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center
SCOTUS Death Penalty Review Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center lsoronen@sso.org Modern Death Penalty Jurisprudence 1970s SCOTUS tells the states they must limit arbitrariness in who gets the death
More informationGIVEN HIM A FAIR TRIAL, THEN HANG HIM: THE SUPREME COURT S MODERN DEATH PENALTY JURISPRUDENCE *
GIVEN HIM A FAIR TRIAL, THEN HANG HIM: THE SUPREME COURT S MODERN DEATH PENALTY JURISPRUDENCE * MARK S. HURWITZ In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court ruled the arbitrary and capricious nature
More informationC A R D O Z O L AW R E V I E W FURMAN S RESURRECTION: PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW AND THE SUPREME COURT S SECOND CHANCE TO FULFILL FURMAN S PROMISE
de novo C A R D O Z O L AW R E V I E W FURMAN S RESURRECTION: PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW AND THE SUPREME COURT S SECOND CHANCE TO FULFILL FURMAN S PROMISE Bidish Sarma* INTRODUCTION Last term, Justice Stevens
More informationKansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014
K a n s a s L e g i s l a t i v e R e s e a r c h D e p a r t m e n t Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014 O-1 Tort Claims Act O-2 Death Penalty in Kansas O-3 Kansas Administrative Procedure Act O-4 Sex
More information(4) When the victim is under the age of twelve years. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.
Capital Punishment for the Rape of a Child is Cruel and Unusual Punishment Under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution: Kennedy v. Louisiana CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - EIGHTH AMENDMENT - CRUEL
More informationCriminal Law - Death Penalty: Jury Discretion Bridled
Campbell Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2 Spring 1983 Article 8 January 1983 Criminal Law - Death Penalty: Jury Discretion Bridled J. Craig Young Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/clr
More informationHow Administrative Law Halted the Death Penalty in Maryland
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary Volume 28 Issue 1 Article 3 3-15-2008 How Administrative Law Halted the Death Penalty in Maryland Arnold Rochvarg Follow this and additional
More informationThe Evolution of Cruel and Unusual Punishment. As times change and societies adjust to those changes in their maturation process, the application
Hannah Young Young 1 October 18, 2017 The Evolution of Cruel and Unusual Punishment As times change and societies adjust to those changes in their maturation process, the application of laws should also
More informationConsiglio: Purpose of the Eighth Amendment STUDENT ESSAY
Consiglio: Purpose of the Eighth Amendment 6:2 Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy 261 STUDENT ESSAY INTENTIONALLY INFLICTED: THE BAZE PLURALITY PAINFULLY "EXECUTED" THE PURPOSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 07-5439 In the Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. JOHN D. REES, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky BRIEF OF THE STATES OF
More informationFURMAN V. GEORGIA United States Supreme Court 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed. 2d. 346 (1972)
FURMAN V. GEORGIA United States Supreme Court 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed. 2d. 346 (1972) In this case the Supreme Court invalidates Georgia s death penalty statute. This decision represents three
More informationNo IN THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
E-Filed 01/24/2018 11:15:48 AM Honorable Julia Jordan Weller Clerk of the Court No. 1961635 IN THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT EX PARTE VERNON MADISON * * STATE OF ALABAMA, * EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR * JANUARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DENNIS SOCHOR, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-1841 DENNIS SOCHOR, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY,
More informationThe Death Penalty for Rape - Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
Louisiana Law Review Volume 38 Number 3 Spring 1978 The Death Penalty for Rape - Cruel and Unusual Punishment? Constance R. LeSage Repository Citation Constance R. LeSage, The Death Penalty for Rape -
More informationCase 5:10-cv JLH Document 12 Filed 03/11/2010 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Case 5:10-cv-00065-JLH Document 12 Filed 03/11/2010 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JACK HAROLD JONES, JR. PLAINTIFF v. No. 5:10CV00065
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC06-1966 DANNY HAROLD ROLLING, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [October 18, 2006] Danny Harold Rolling, a prisoner under sentence of death and an active
More information1/19/2004 8:03 PM HYLLENGRENMACROFINAL.DOC
Constitutional Law Capital Punishment of Mentally Retarded Defendants is Cruel and Unusual Under the Eighth Amendment Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution
More informationCRIMINAL LAW. Death Penalty e Cruel and Unusual Punishment 0 Individualized Sentencing Determination
AKaON LAW REIvmw (Vol. 12:2 v. Virginia."' That theory still has viability but the contemporary view is that it refers to the states' power to regulate use of natural resources within the confines of constitutional
More informationThe Constitutionality of Executing Juvenile and Mentally Retarded Offenders: A Precedential Analysis and Proposal for Reconsideration
Boston College Law Review Volume 31 Issue 4 Number 4 Article 3 7-1-1990 The Constitutionality of Executing Juvenile and Mentally Retarded Offenders: A Precedential Analysis and Proposal for Reconsideration
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 585 U. S. (2018) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES RICHARD GERALD JORDAN 17 7153 v. MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY NELSON EVANS, AKA TIMOTHY N. EVANS, AKA TIMOTHY EVANS, AKA TIM EVANS 17 7245 v. MISSISSIPPI
More informationBrett Chapman, Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice
ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: A RE-ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF RACE IN THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY SYSTEM Brett Chapman, Doctor of Philosophy, 2009 Dissertation Directed by: Dr. Raymond Paternoster Department
More informationShould Capital Punishment Be Considered Humane or Cruel and Unusual? Capital Punishment
Should Capital Punishment Be Considered Humane or Cruel and Unusual? University of Phoenix HIS 301 - U.S. Constitution May 19, 2007 Capital Punishment Intro/ N History & principles of the Constitution/
More informationOCTOBER TERM 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CASE NO.
OCTOBER TERM 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CASE NO. JASON McGEHEE, STACEY JOHNSON, BRUCE WARD, TERRICK NOONER, JACK JONES, MARCEL WILLIAMS, KENNETH WILLIAMS, DON DAVIS, and LEDELL LEE,
More informationCapital Punishment: Political and Moral Issue. execution occurring in Because America was still a main part of Great Britain many of its
Aiello 1 Brandy Aiello Mrs. Jackie Burr English 1010 19 December 2013 Capital Punishment: Political and Moral Issue The death penalty has been around for a few centuries, dating back to the first recorded
More informationAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington. Supplementary Material
AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington Supplementary Material Chapter 11: The Contemporary Era Criminal Justice/Punishments/Capital
More informationChapter 9. Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty
Chapter 9 Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Objectives After completing this chapter, you should be able to: Identify the general factors that influence a judge s sentencing decisions.
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 07-5439 In the Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., v. Petitioners, JOHN D. REES, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky BRIEF OF HUMAN RIGHTS
More informationQuestioning Capital Punishment: Law, Policy, and Practice James R. Acker
Questioning Capital Punishment: Law, Policy, and Practice James R. Acker Preface Acknowledgements PART I Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 PART II Chapter 4 THE DEATH PENALTY S JUSTIFICATIONS: PRO AND CON
More informationLogical and Consistent? An Analysis of Supreme Court Opinions Regarding the Death Penalty
Logical and Consistent? An Analysis of Supreme Court Opinions Regarding the Death Penalty Matthew B. Robinson and Kathleen M. Simon* Volume 3 - No. 1 Spring 2006 * Matthew B. Robinson and Kathleen M. Simon
More informationSentencing: The imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. (p.260)
CHAPTER 9 Sentencing Teaching Outline I. Introduction (p.260) Sentencing: The imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. (p.260) II. The Philosophy and Goals of Criminal Sentencing (p.260)
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF THE DEATH PENALTY 1. Abstract. This paper undertakes a survey of three facets of the death penalty: its
AN ANALYSIS OF THE DEATH PENALTY 1 Abstract This paper undertakes a survey of three facets of the death penalty: its constitutionality, morality, and practicality. Section I provides an introduction to
More informationRemembering Furman s Comparative Proportionality: A Response to Smith and Staihar
Remembering Furman s Comparative Proportionality: A Response to Smith and Staihar William W. Berry III * I. INTRODUCTION... 65 II. COMPARATIVE PROPORTIONALITY THROUGH THE SMITH LENS...67 III. COMPARATIVE
More informationF I L E D September 16, 2011
Case: 11-50447 Document: 0051160478 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/16/011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D September 16, 011 In
More informationLecture Notes Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S (2002) Keith Burgess-Jackson 29 April 2016
Lecture Notes Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304-54 (2002) Keith Burgess-Jackson 29 April 2016 0. Composition of the Court. In Penry v. Lynaugh (1989), five justices held that capital punishment for the
More informationWritten Materials for Supreme Court Review 8 th Amendment Instructor: Joel Oster
Written Materials for Supreme Court Review 8 th Amendment Instructor: Joel Oster I. Hall v. Florida, 134 S.Ct. 1986 (2014) a. Facts: After the Supreme Court held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 11, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, J. Hobart Darbyshire,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-576 / 10-1815 Filed July 11, 2012 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHRISTINE MARIE LOCKHEART, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,180 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 114,180 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ARTHUR ANTHONY SHELTROWN, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2017. Affirmed. Appeal from
More informationNo. 46,696-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered January 25, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 46,696-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * *
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,888 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JAY A. MCLAUGHLIN, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,888 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JAY A. MCLAUGHLIN, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2018. Affirmed. Appeal from Sedgwick
More informationThe Supreme Court, the Death Penalty, and Evolving Standards of Decency: A History of Interpretation
Critique: A worldwide student journal of politics The Supreme Court, the Death Penalty, and Evolving Standards of Decency: A History of Interpretation Marc Bacharach Miami University, Oxford Introduction
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 09-70030 Document: 00511160264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D June 30, 2010 Lyle
More informationNo DR SCT EN BANC ORDER. This matter comes before the En Banc Court on Richard Gerald Jordan's Successive
Serial: 212145 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-DR-00960-SCT RICHARD GERALD JORDAN v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED JUN 15 2017 C}FFLCE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS EN BANC ORDER
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 553 U. S. (2008) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07 5439 RALPH BAZE AND THOMAS C. BOWLING, PETI- TIONERS v. JOHN D. REES, COMMISSIONER, KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. ON WRIT
More informationTHE DEATH PENALTY IN 2001: YEAR END REPORT
THE DEATH PENALTY IN 2001: YEAR END REPORT Death Penalty Information Center December 2001 Executions Decline 22% Death Row Numbers Also Drop Death Penalty Reforms Initiated Across Country Death Penalty
More informationHow Long Is Too Long?: Conflicting State Responses to De Facto Life Without Parole Sentences After Graham v. Florida and Miller v.
Fordham Law Review Volume 82 Issue 6 Article 25 2014 How Long Is Too Long?: Conflicting State Responses to De Facto Life Without Parole Sentences After Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama Kelly Scavone
More informationEqual Justice And The Death Penalty: A Legal And Empirical Analysis By David C. Baldus READ ONLINE
Equal Justice And The Death Penalty: A Legal And Empirical Analysis By David C. Baldus READ ONLINE If you are looking for a book Equal Justice And The Death Penalty: A Legal and Empirical Analysis by David
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Wednesday, the 31st day of March, 2004.
VIRGINIA: In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Wednesday, the 31st day of March, 2004. Dennis Mitchell Orbe, Appellant, against Record No. 040673
More information* * Trial Court No
STATE OF TENNESSEE Respondent-Appellee v. BILLY RAY IRICK Petitioner-Appellant IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, " AT NASHVILLE 2011 S? 13 F.;: /c: 20., - ">, a". /.,.! ::~!~l\:.; ;)., I - I: L:iiii..:T
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 1 PRINTER'S NO. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION No. Session of 0 INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, ERICKSON, PIPPY, D. WHITE, LEACH, FERLO, WASHINGTON, WILLIAMS AND WOZNIAK,
More informationThe Burger Court Opinion Writing Database
The Burger Court Opinion Writing Database Aikens v. California 406 U.S. 813 (1972) Paul J. Wahlbeck, George Washington University James F. Spriggs, II, Washington University Forrest Maltzman, George Washington
More informationamnesty international
[EMBARGOED FOR: 25 September 2002] Public amnesty international UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Indecent and internationally illegal The death penalty against child offenders (Abridged Version) September 2002
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 553 U. S. (2008) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07 5439 RALPH BAZE AND THOMAS C. BOWLING, PETI- TIONERS v. JOHN D. REES, COMMISSIONER, KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. ON WRIT
More informationCite as 2018 Ark. 313 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Cite as 2018 Ark. 313 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-17-291 BRUCE EARL WARD APPELLANT Opinion Delivered: November 1, 2018 V. WILLIAM ASA HUTCHINSON, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS; WENDY KELLEY, DIRECTOR
More informationWhile the common law has banned executing the insane for centuries, 1 the U.S. Supreme Court did not hold that the Eighth Amendment
FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS DEATH PENALTY ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMS LOWER COURT FINDING THAT MENTALLY ILL PRISONER IS COMPETENT TO BE EXECUTED. Ferguson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 716 F.3d
More informationHOW DO THE FIFTH, SIXTH, AND EIGHTH AMENDMENTS PROTECT RIGHTS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM?
32 HOW DO THE FIFTH, SIXTH, AND EIGHTH AMENDMENTS PROTECT RIGHTS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM? LESSON PURPOSE Four of the first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights address the rights of criminal defendants.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES THOMAS KNIGHT, AKA ASKARI ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD 98 9741 v. FLORIDA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CAREY DEAN MOORE
More informationThe Constitution Limits of the "National Consensus" Doctrine in Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence
BYU Law Review Volume 2012 Issue 4 Article 6 11-1-2012 The Constitution Limits of the "National Consensus" Doctrine in Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence Kevin White Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Indecent and internationally illegal The death penalty against child offenders
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Indecent and internationally illegal The death penalty against child offenders Introduction ''In my view, it's just not proper in a civilized society for the State to be in the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 548 U. S. (2006) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 04 1170 KANSAS, PETITIONER v. MICHAEL LEE MARSH, II ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS [June 26, 2006] JUSTICE SOUTER,
More informationCapital Punishment. The use of the death penalty to punish wrongdoers for certain crimes. Micki ONeal 12/5/2011
Capital Punishment The use of the death penalty to punish wrongdoers for certain crimes. Micki ONeal 12/5/2011 I am a human being and nothing pertaining to human is alien to me, so said Karl Marx (www.sociologist.com)
More informationIncarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003
Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 03 According to the latest statistics from the U.S. Department of Justice, more than two million men and women are now behind bars in the United
More informationKey Decisions in Felony Disenfranchisement Litigation For more information, visit:
Right To Vote Key Decisions in Felony Disenfranchisement Litigation For more information, visit: www.brennancenter.org Table of Contents: I. United States Supreme Court Richardson v. Ramirez O Brien v.
More informationCivil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES
Civil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES In the U.S. when one is accused of breaking the law he / she has rights for which the government cannot infringe upon when trying
More informationBaumgartner, POLI 195 Spring 2013
Baumgartner, POLI 195 Spring 2013 How the death penalty came back after Furman (1972) Reading: Garland, ch 6 January 28 2013 Furman v. Georgia (1972) Death penalty, as currently practiced, is: Arbitrary,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- HENRY MONTGOMERY, vs.
More informationDEATH AFTER LIFE: THE FUTURE OF NEW YORK'S MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY FOR MURDERS COMMITTED BY LIFE- TERM PRISONERS
Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 13 Number 3 Article 5 1985 DEATH AFTER LIFE: THE FUTURE OF NEW YORK'S MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY FOR MURDERS COMMITTED BY LIFE- TERM PRISONERS Andrea Galbo Follow this and
More informationCruel Techniques, Unusual Secrets
Cruel Techniques, Unusual Secrets WILLIAM W. BERRY III * &MEGHAN J. RYAN In the recent case of Glossip v. Gross, the Supreme Court denied a death row petitioner s challenge to Oklahoma s lethal injection
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 294
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 State of Arkansas st General Assembly As Engrossed: S// A Bill Regular Session, SENATE BILL By: Senator
More informationConstitutional Law Criminal Procedure Eighth Amendment Bars Execution of the Insane
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 9 Issue 2 Article 7 1986 Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Eighth Amendment Bars Execution of the Insane Jonathan Taylor Follow this and additional
More informationStates revisit the death penalty
criminal justice criminal justice States revisit the death penalty The death chamber in Texas. Photo by Bruce W. Moore, Texas Department of Criminal Justice As DNA tests prove more death-row inmates are
More informationNo IN THE. MARCUS REED, Petitioner, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana
No. 16-656 IN THE MARCUS REED, Petitioner, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana REPLY BRIEF G. Ben Cohen* The Promise of Justice Initiative
More informationEighth and Fourteenth Amendments--The Death Penalty Survives
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 78 Issue 4 Winter Article 14 Winter 1988 Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments--The Death Penalty Survives Anderson E. Bynam Follow this and additional works at:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-650 Opinion Delivered February 26, 2015 THERNELL HUNDLEY V. APPELLANT RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE JEFFERSON COUNTY
More informationEighth Amendment Challenges After Baze v. Rees: Lethal Injection, Civil Rights Lawsuits, and the Death Penalty
Boston College Third World Law Journal Volume 31 Issue 2 Article 1 5-1-2011 Eighth Amendment Challenges After Baze v. Rees: Lethal Injection, Civil Rights Lawsuits, and the Death Penalty Harvey Gee Follow
More informationU.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act
U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act July 2013 Data Introduction As part of its ongoing mission, the United States Sentencing Commission provides Congress,
More informationMEMORANDUM SUMMARY NATIONAL OVERVIEW. Research Methodology:
MEMORANDUM Prepared for: Sen. Taylor Date: January 26, 2018 By: Whitney Perez Re: Strangulation offenses LPRO: LEGISLATIVE POLICY AND RESEARCH OFFICE You asked for information on offense levels for strangulation
More informationAn Arbitrary Death? Truman Braslaw. Capital Punishment and the Supreme Court. Harry Hirsch Primary Advisor
An Arbitrary Death? Capital Punishment and the Supreme Court Truman Braslaw Harry Hirsch Primary Advisor Ronald Kahn Chris Howell Jade Schiff Secondary Advisors Oberlin, Ohio 2014 1 Foreword In this thesis
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFFERSON DUNN, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. VERNON MADISON ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationKristin E. Murrock *
A COFFIN WAS THE ONLY WAY OUT: WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT S EXPLICIT BAN ON JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE FOR NON-HOMICIDE OFFENSES IN GRAHAM V. FLORIDA IMPLICITLY BANS DE FACTO LIFE SENTENCES FOR NON-HOMICIDE
More informationEighth Amendment--The Death Penalty and the Mentally Retarded Criminal: Fairness, Culpability, and Death
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 80 Issue 4 Winter Article 12 Winter 1990 Eighth Amendment--The Death Penalty and the Mentally Retarded Criminal: Fairness, Culpability, and Death Peter K.M.
More informationCase 5:06-cv SWW Document 75 Filed 07/17/07 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Case 5:06-cv-00110-SWW Document 75 Filed 07/17/07 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TERRICK TERRELL NOONER DON WILLIAM DAVIS JACK HAROLD
More informationTHE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, GREGORY NIDEZ VALENCIA JR., Petitioner. Respondent, JOEY LEE HEALER, Petitioner.
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. GREGORY NIDEZ VALENCIA JR., Petitioner. THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. JOEY LEE HEALER, Petitioner. No. 2 CA-CR 2015-0151-PR
More informationCASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bond, Attorney General, and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA PATRICK JOSEPH SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationCriminal Procedure. 8 th Edition Joel Samaha. Wadsworth Publishing
Criminal Procedure 8 th Edition Joel Samaha Wadsworth Publishing Criminal Procedure and the Constitution Chapter 2 Constitutionalism In a constitutional democracy, constitutionalism is the idea that constitutions
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER SCOTT EMMETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER SCOTT EMMETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, GEORGE HINKLE, WARDEN, GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, LORETTA K.
More informationThe Furman Case: What Life is Left in the Death Penalty?
Volume 22 Issue 3 Spring 1973 Article 5 1973 The Furman Case: What Life is Left in the Death Penalty? Thomas P. Gilliss Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended
More informationan Honors Project submitted by Lara E. McDonald 1702 High Gate Lane Salem, Virginia (540)
MENTAL ILLNESS, ANTI-PSYCHOTIC MEDICATION, AND THE DEATH PENALTY: DOES EXECUTING AN INMATE WHO HAS BEEN FORCIBLY MEDICATED CONSTITUTE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT? an Honors Project submitted by Lara E.
More information