Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
|
|
- Wilfred Daniel
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, AS CONSERVATOR FOR THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, on behalf of the Trustee of the Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006-WM4 (SABR WM4), Plaintiff, Case No. 1:13-cv-0584-(AKH) WMC MORTGAGE, LLC f/k/a WMC MORTGAGE CORP. Defendant. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, solely in its capacity as Trustee of the Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006-WM4 (SABR 2006-WM4), Plaintiff, WMC MORTGAGE, LLC f/k/a WMC MORTGAGE CORP. Defendant. v. v. WMC MORTGAGE, LLC S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
2 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 2 of 14 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTRODUCTION...1 ARGUMENT...3 I. ACE II Means That The Trustee s Complaint Is Untimely....3 II. Under ACE II, There is No Prior Pleading to Which The Trustee s Complaint May Relate Back....7 III. If This Court Does Not Dismiss the Complaint, It Should Stay This Case Pending Any Appeal to the New York Court of Appeals....9 CONCLUSION...10 APPENDICES Appendix A - Decision and Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint as Untimely, Signed and Entered on December 17, 2013, ECF No. 53. Appendix B - Decision in ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., No /12, 2013 WL (1st Dep t, Dec. 19, 2013) Appendix C ACE I Pooling and Servicing Agreement 9.01(iii), 9.02(a)(iii)-(iv), No /2012, NYSCEF No. 8 Ex. A Appendix D Summons With Notice, ACE I, No /2012, NYSCEF No. 1 (Filed Mar. 28, 2012)
3 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 3 of 14 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., 965 N.Y.S. 2d 844 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013)...1, 4 ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., No /12, 2013 WL (1st Dep t Dec. 19, 2013)... passim Alcan Aluminum Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 539 F. Supp. 512 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)...10 Cornejo v. Bell, 592 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2010)...5 Cowen & Co. v. Tecnoconsult Holdings Ltd., No. 96 Civ (BSJ), 1996 WL (S.D.N.Y. July 11, 1996)...6 Ely-Cruikshank Co. v Bank of Montreal, 81 N.Y.2d 399 (1993)...5 Entron, Inc. v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 749 F.2d 127 (2d Cir. 1984)...6 Floyd v. City of N.Y., 813 F. Supp. 2d 457 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)...2 Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 264 F.3d 21 (2d Cir. 2001)...6 Harem-Christensen Corp. v. M.S. Frigo Harmony, 477 F. Supp. 694 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)...6 Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. v. Evergreen Moneysource Mortg. Co., 793 F. Supp. 2d 1189, (W.D. Wash. 2011)...6 McCavitt v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp., 237 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2001)...5 McCavitt v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp., 89 F.Supp. 2d 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)...5 Nomura Asset Acceptance Corp. Alt. Loan Trust, Series 2005-S4, v. Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc., No /2011, 2013 WL (N.Y. Sup. Ct., May 10, 2013)...6 ii
4 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 4 of 14 Pacific Growth S.A. v. Aon Corp., 1999 WL (S.D.N.Y. 1999)...5 Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 170 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 1999)...5 Perkins v. City of New Rochelle, 2002 WL (S.D.N.Y. 2002)...5 Scott v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 89 Civ (MJL), 1990 WL (S.D.N.Y. 1990)...6 Spicer v. Pier Sixty LLC, 269 F.R.D. 321 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)...5 Structured Mtge. Trust v Daiwa Fin. Corp., 2003 WL (S.D.N.Y. 2003)...4, 6 Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C., 370 F.3d 259 (2nd Cir. 2004)...5 V.S. v. Muhammad, 595 F.3d 426 (2d Cir. 2010)...5 Varo, Inc. v Alvis PLC, 261 A.D.2d iii
5 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 5 of 14 Under Local Rule 6.3 of the Local Rules for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, WMC respectfully submits this motion for reconsideration in light of intervening authority from the Appellate Division, First Department of New York, ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., No /12, 2013 WL (1st Dep t Dec. 19, 2013), reversing the denial of the defendant s motion to dismiss in ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., 965 N.Y.S. 2d 844 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013). INTRODUCTION On December 17, 2013, this Court denied WMC s motion to dismiss the Trustee s Complaint. WMC had moved to dismiss the Complaint because it was untimely. This Court disagreed. Relying on the motion court s opinion in ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., 965 N.Y.S. 2d 844 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013) ( ACE I ), this Court held that the sixyear statute of limitations for a breach of contract claim did not run from the closing date of the agreement in which WMC allegedly made false representations. Instead, the Court held that the limitations period started to run only when WMC allegedly fail[ed] to cure after [it] received notice of the breach. Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint as Untimely ( Order ), ECF No. 53, at 2. 1 Two days after entry of the Order, the Appellate Division reversed ACE I. See ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., No /12, 2013 WL (1st Dep t Dec. 19, 2013) ( ACE II ). 2 Ruling solely on the pleadings, and considering contract language indistinguishable from that here, ACE II expressly rejected the holding and reasoning from ACE I that this Court adopted, and held that the statute of limitations begins to run from the closing 1 For the Court s convenience, a true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as Appendix A. 2 For the Court s convenience, a true and correct copy of the ACE II decision is attached hereto as Appendix B.
6 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 6 of 14 date of the agreement, when the representations are allegedly breached not when the defendant later fails either to cure or repurchase an allegedly defective mortgage loan after receiving notice of such alleged breaches. Id. at *1. Equally important, ACE II also addressed whether a plaintiff-trustee could resurrect an untimely complaint by relating the complaint back to a summons filed earlier by a certificateholder. Again based on contractual language identical to this case, ACE II held that the certificateholder lacked standing to file the summons under the contract s no-action clause, and as a consequence, the trustee s complaint could not relate back to the summons WL , at *1. Accordingly, ACE II held that the defendant s motion to dismiss should have been granted, reversed ACE I, and ordered the case dismissed. Id. Perhaps anticipating this motion, the Trustee has now sent a letter ( Letter ) to the Court urging this Court to continue to follow ACE I. ECF No. 54. But WMC respectfully submits that ACE II presents paradigmatic grounds for reconsideration. ACE II involved identical contract language, it reversed the primary authority on which this Court relied, and it constitutes a definitive ruling from the highest New York court to have considered the issue. Accordingly, WMC asks that the Trustee s complaint be dismissed based upon the new authority. See, e.g., Floyd v. City of N.Y., 813 F. Supp. 2d 457, 464 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) ( The major grounds justifying reconsideration are an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice. (quoting Virgin Atl. Airways, Ltd. v. Nat l Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir. 1992))). 3 3 On December 27, 2013, the Trustee amended its complaint as required by this Court s Order. Dismissal under ACE II is appropriate regardless whether the Court considers the operative pleading to be the Trustee s Complaint that was the subject of the prior motion to dismiss, or the First Amended Complaint. The two pleadings allege the same claims, and the minor differences 2
7 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 7 of 14 In light of ACE II, dismissal of the Complaint is warranted, but if the Court declines to dismiss the Complaint at this time, it should at a minimum stay the case pending any further appeal of the ACE II decision to the New York Court of Appeals. A stay would be a reasonable exercise of the Court s discretion and would prevent a waste of resources on claims that are untimely under ACE II. ARGUMENT I. ACE II Means That The Trustee s Complaint Is Untimely. ACE is on all fours with this case. Indeed, the Trustee embraced ACE in opposing WMC s motion to dismiss: ACE is directly on point with a repurchase framework identical to the one at issue here. Trustee s Mem. of Law in Opp. to Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 44 at 10. In ACE, as here, the substituted plaintiff-trustee alleged that the defendant breached representations and warranties in connection with the securitization of a pool of mortgage loans governed by [the parties contracts]. Compare ACE II, 2013 WL , at *1 with Compl (alleging breaches of representations and warranties in the PSA). In ACE, as here, the substituted plaintiff-trustee did not file its complaint until more than six years after the alleged breach of those representations and warranties. Compare ACE II, 2013 WL , at *1 with Compl. 1, 1 (parties contract signed in December 2006 and complaint initially filed in June 2013). And in ACE, as here, the trustee argued that its suit was nevertheless timely because its between them are inconsequential with respect to the statute of limitations. Indeed, no amendment of pleading could change the legal conclusion that ACE II compels. Thus, WMC asks that this motion for reconsideration be granted, or, if the Court prefers, WMC asks that the Court treat this motion for reconsideration as a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint or motion for judgment on the pleadings, as appropriate. Unless the Court directs otherwise, WMC will, of course, file an answer to the First Amended Complaint by January 10, 2014 as previously ordered by the Court. 3
8 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 8 of 14 claims accrued on the date defendant failed to timely cure or to repurchase, as required by the terms of the parties agreement. Compare ACE I, 965 N.Y.S. 2d at 848 ( Plaintiff argues that [its] claims did not accrue until [defendant] breached its repurchase obligations. ) with Trustee s Mem. of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 44, at 3 (citing ACE I and contending the claim for the breach does not accrue until [the Responsible Party] fails to timely cure or repurchase a loan ). At the trial level, the ACE I court held that the trustee s complaint was timely and denied the defendant s motion to dismiss. In that court s view, the breach [was] the failure to comply with [the plaintiff s repurchase] demand, and so the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the defendant rejected that demand in ACE I, 965 N.Y.S.2d at 849. That logic was adopted by this Court in denying WMC's motion to dismiss. Order at 2. Soon thereafter, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed ACE I, and held that the defendant s motion to dismiss should have been granted. On the basis of the pleadings, it held that the breach accrued at the time the representation and warranties were made in March 2006, and not in 2012, when defendant allegedly failed to cure or repurchase upon the plaintiff s demand. Citing Structured Mtge. Trust v Daiwa Fin. Corp., 2003 WL (S.D.N.Y. 2003), the Appellate Division held that: The motion court erred in finding that plaintiff s claims did not accrue until defendant either failed to timely cure or repurchase a mortgage loan. To the contrary, the claims accrued on the closing date of the [MLPA], March 28, 2006, when any breach of the representations and warranties contained therein occurred. ACE II, 2013 WL , at *1 (also citing Ely-Cruikshank Co. v Bank of Montreal, 81 N.Y.2d 399, 402 (1993) and Varo, Inc. v Alvis PLC, 261 A.D.2d 262, st Dep t 1999)). Having wrapped its arms around the favorable decision by the trial court in ACE, the Trustee is now bound by the Appellate Division s contrary decision in the same matter. The 4
9 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 9 of 14 Trustee nonetheless urges this Court to continue to follow the reasoning in ACE I. Letter at 2. But as the most authoritative decision from New York s appellate courts, ACE II s statement of New York law is binding on this Court absent persuasive evidence that the New York Court of Appeals would disagree with that decision. See, e.g., Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 170 F.3d 125, 134 (2d Cir. 1999) ( We are bound, as was the district court, to apply the law as interpreted by New York s intermediate appellate courts unless we find persuasive evidence that the New York Court of Appeals, which has not ruled on this issue, would reach a different conclusion. ); V.S. v. Muhammad, 595 F.3d 426, 432 (2d Cir. 2010) (following Appellate Division authority); Cornejo v. Bell, 592 F.3d 121, 130 (2d Cir. 2010) (same); Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C., 370 F.3d 259, 263 (2nd Cir. 2004) (same); McCavitt v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp., 237 F.3d 166, 167 (2d Cir. 2001) (same); Grand Light & Supply Co., Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 771 F.2d 672, 678 (2d Cir. 1985) (same); Spicer v. Pier Sixty LLC, 269 F.R.D. 321, (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); McCavitt v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp., 89 F.Supp. 2d 495, (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (same); see also Strubbe v. Sonnenschein, 299 F.2d 185, 188 (2d Cir. 1962) (A federal court is bound to apply the law of the state as found by an intermediate appellate court in the absence of more convincing evidence of what the state law is. ) (quoting Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Field, 311 U.S. 169, 178 (1940)). Here, the Trustee offers no persuasive evidence for following ACE I instead of ACE II, a unanimous four-justice opinion of the Appellate Division. There was no dissent in ACE II, and its holding is not the subject of debate among lower state courts. 4 To the contrary, ACE II is 4 To support its claim that Appellate Division decisions are not binding on federal courts, the Trustee cites a handful of federal decisions that have not followed intermediate state appellate decisions, on various legal issues, see Letter at 2, but those are all cases unlike this one in which the Appellate Division decision either included a dissent or was contradicted by other 5
10 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 10 of 14 only the latest of several cases to reject the Trustee s theory. See Nomura Asset Acceptance Corp. Alt. Loan Trust, Series 2005-S4, v. Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc., No /2011, 2013 WL , at *8 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., May 10, 2013); Structured Mortgage Trust v. Daiwa Finance Corp., No. 02-CV-3232, 2003 WL (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2003); Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. v. Evergreen Moneysource Mortg. Co., 793 F. Supp. 2d 1189, (W.D. Wash. 2011) (applying New York law). Under ACE II, the statute of limitations here started running no later than December 28, 2006, the PSA s Closing Date, when the representations and warranties made by WMC were allegedly breached, and not, as the Trustee alleges in Count I, when WMC allegedly failed to repurchase upon the Trustee s demand. The Trustee was therefore too late when it filed its Complaint more than six years later, on June 18, Moreover, ACE II s holding requires dismissal of the Complaint in its entirety. In addition to alleging that WMC failed to cure the alleged breaches or repurchase on demand (Count I), the Trustee also contends that WMC breached the PSA by failing to notify the Trustee of those same alleged breaches (Count II). Despite the conclusory assertion in the Trustee s letter that Count II survives ACE II, Letter at 3, the result is the same for both claims. Whether the Trustee s claim is framed as a failure to cure a breach or as a failure to give notice of that substantial case law. See Harem-Christensen Corp. v. M.S. Frigo Harmony, 477 F. Supp. 694, (S.D.N.Y. 1979) (finding that Court of Appeals was more likely to agree with the strong dissent by two of the panel s five justices ); Cowen & Co. v. Tecnoconsult Holdings Ltd., No. 96 Civ (BSJ), 1996 WL , at *4 nn.2-3 (S.D.N.Y. July 11, 1996) (finding decision was distinguishable and there was no consensus among lower courts in any event); Entron, Inc. v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 749 F.2d 127, 132 (2d Cir. 1984) (lower courts in disagreement and prior Supreme Court decision expressly envisioned a different result); Scott v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 89 Civ (MJL), 1990 WL , at *5 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) (decision rejected by several other federal courts). Another case cited by the Trustee, Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 264 F.3d 21 (2d Cir. 2001), does not discuss intermediate appellate decisions at all. 6
11 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 11 of 14 breach, each claim is premised on the same underlying alleged breach of representations and warranties. Thus, if WMC breached its duty to notify, under ACE II that claim accrued when the representations and warranties allegedly were breached in December 2006, which was more than six years before the Trustee filed the Complaint. II. Under ACE II, There is No Prior Pleading to Which The Trustee s Complaint May Relate Back. Because the Trustee s Complaint is untimely, it can survive WMC s motion to dismiss only if it can relate back to the FHFA s December 27, 2012 Summons with Notice. See WMC s Mem. of Law, ECF No. 42, at 15-17; WMC s Reply Mem. of Law, ECF No. 47, at 2-6. In denying WMC s motion to dismiss, this Court held that it would be premature to resolve the relation-back question on a motion to dismiss. Order at 2. ACE II speaks dispositively to this issue as well and instructs that dismissal is appropriate indeed required here at the pleadings stage. ACE II held that a certificateholder s failure to satisfy a no-action clause makes the certificateholder s summons invalid, and thereby precludes relation-back as a matter of law. As ACE II explained, compliance with a no-action clause is a condition precedent to suit, and a certificateholder who fails to satisfy the clause lack[s] standing to commence the action in the first instance. ACE II, 2013 WL , at *1. ACE II further held that a substituted plaintiff s complaint cannot relate back to a summons that the original plaintiff lacked standing to file. Id. ( Nor does the substitution of the trustee as plaintiff permit us to deem timely filed the trustee s complaint. ). Accordingly, in ACE II, the certificateholder s summons was invalid because the certificateholder had failed to present the trustee with a proper written notice of default and the continuance thereof as required by the no-action clause, and the trustee s complaint was untimely because it could not relate back to the invalid summons. Id. 7
12 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 12 of 14 This case likewise warrants dismissal under the no-action clause in the PSA that governs here. Just as in ACE, the certificateholder (here the FHFA) filed its summons on the last day of the limitations period. ACE II, 2013 WL , at *1. And here, just as in ACE, the certificateholder failed to comply with the plain language of the clause. Among other requirements, the no-action clause required the FHFA prior to filing suit to have (1) made a written request to the Trustee to institute such action in the Trustee s own name, (2) to have offered to the Trustee such reasonable indemnity as it may require against the costs, expenses, and liabilities to be incurred, and (3) to have given the Trustee a written notice of an Event of Default and of the continuance thereof. (PSA 10.07). The clause further (4) barred any action by the FHFA until the Trustee, for 60 days after its receipt of such notice, request and offer of indemnity shall have neglected or refused to institute any such action. Id. In this case, the Trustee has never alleged that the FHFA satisfied these requirements. That is, the Trustee does not contend that the FHFA made a written request asking the Trustee to file suit, that the FHFA offered indemnity to the Trustee, that the FHFA gave notice of an Event of Default that was continuing, or that the FHFA waited the required 60 days before bringing suit itself. The absence of these allegations is fatal under ACE II, which holds, consistent with a long line of New York authority, that a plaintiff who fails to comply with a no-action clause does not have standing to sue. Id; see also WMC Mem. of Law, ECF No. 42, at 16 (discussing no-action authority providing that such clauses are strictly construed and serve to protect those who might be sued at a certificateholder s behest). In its Letter, the Trustee nevertheless contends that the no-action clause should not bar the summons because the Trustee could have filed a case against WMC on its own or at the direction of a qualifying Certificateholder, and because the the FHFA filed the Summons as a 8
13 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 13 of 14 derivative action on behalf of the Trust and all Certificateholders. Letter at 2. These arguments cannot be sustained for the reasons given in WMC s prior briefing. WMC s Reply Mem. of Law, ECF No. 47, at 2-6. Moreover, exactly the same circumstances were present in ACE II. The parties contract in ACE also allowed the Trustee to sue with or without certificateholder direction. See PSA 9.01(iii), 9.02(a)(iii)-(iv), ACE I, No /2012, NYSCEF No. 8 Ex. A. 5 And the summons filed by the certificateholder in ACE also purported to bring a derivative action on behalf of the trust. See Summons With Notice, ACE I, No /2012, NYSCEF No. 1 (Mar. 28, 2012). 6 ACE II held that the summons was invalid nonetheless. Because it is undisputed that the no-action clause was not satisfied here, the FHFA lacked standing to commence the action on behalf of the trust, and the Trustee s Complaint cannot relate back to the FHFA s summons under ACE II. III. If This Court Does Not Dismiss the Complaint, It Should Stay This Case Pending Any Appeal to the New York Court of Appeals. Dismissal is the proper course under ACE II, but WMC respectfully requests in the alternative that this Court should at a minimum stay proceedings pending the resolution of any appeal in ACE II to the New York Court of Appeals. Any motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is due by January 22, A stay pending the resolution of any appeal would be an appropriate exercise of judicial discretion because it would avoid unnecessary discovery and other proceedings regarding claims and other proceedings currently deemed untimely under the rule announced by the Appellate Division. See, e.g., Alcan Aluminum Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 539 F. Supp. 512, (S.D.N.Y. 1982) (staying action where the case involved 5 For the Court s convenience, a true and correct copy of the relevant ACE contract provisions is attached hereto as Appendix C. 6 For the Court s convenience, a true and correct copy of the ACE Summons with Notice is attached hereto as Appendix D. 9
14 Case 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 14 of 14 uncertainty as to the interpretation of state law and similarly situated corporations were already seeking review by highest state court and Supreme Court of the United States). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, as well as those provided in WMC s Memorandum and Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion To Dismiss, WMC respectfully requests that this Court grant this motion and dismiss the Complaint as untimely or, at a minimum, stay this proceeding pending resolution of any appeal in ACE II by the New York Court of Appeals. Dated December 31, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Stephen L. Ascher Stephen L. Ascher JENNER & BLOCK LLP 919 Third Avenue New York, NY Phone: Fax: sascher@jenner.com Paul M. Smith Matthew S. Hellman (pro hac vice) JENNER & BLOCK LLP 1099 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC Phone: Fax: psmith@jenner.com mhellman@jenner.com Barbara S. Steiner (pro hac vice) Megan B. Poetzel (pro hac vice) JENNER & BLOCK LLP 353 N. Clark St. Chicago, IL Phone: Fax: bsteiner@jenner.com, mpoetzel@jenner.com 10
Federal Hous. Fin. Agency v UBS Real Estate Sec., Inc NY Slip Op 31458(U) July 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12
Federal Hous. Fin. Agency v UBS Real Estate Sec., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 31458(U) July 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651282/12 Judge: Marcy Friedman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationU.S. Bank National Association, solely in its capacity as Trustee of the HOME EQUITY ASSET TRUST (HEAT ), Plaintiff, against
Page 1 of 9 [*1] U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 50029(U) Decided on January 15, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Bransten, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting
More informationHSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32257(U) November 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 32257(U) November 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652727/14 Judge: Marcy Friedman Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationCase 1:12-cv CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-04873-CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
More informationBank of N.Y. Mellon v WMC Mtge., LLC NY Slip Op Supreme Court, New York County. Kornreich, J.
[*1] Bank of N.Y. Mellon v WMC Mtge., LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 25318 Decided on September 18, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Kornreich, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
More informationHome Equity Asset Trust (Heat ) v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc NY Slip Op 50001(U) Decided on January 3, 2014
[*1] Home Equity Asset Trust 2006-5 (Heat 2006-5) v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 50001(U) Decided on January 3, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Bransten, J. Published by New York State Law
More informationU.S. Bank N.A. v Greenpoint Mtge. Funding, Inc NY Slip Op 30307(U) March 3, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013
U.S. Bank N.A. v Greenpoint Mtge. Funding, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 30307(U) March 3, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651954/2013 Judge: Marcy S. Friedman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2013 INDEX NO. 653787/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE TRUST SERIES
More informationOwnit Mtge. Loan Trust v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32303(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Ownit Mtge. Loan Trust v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 32303(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651370/2014 Judge: Marcy S. Friedman Cases posted with
More informationCase 1:14-cv RMB-SN Document 95 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 11. Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs, Defendants.
Case 1:14-cv-09371-RMB-SN Document 95 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------}(
More informationMARCY S. FRIEDMAN Justice. The following papers, numbered 1 to were read on this motion to dismiss. No (s). Answering Affidavits - Exhibits
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 9/3/214 9:39 AM INDEX NO. 653429/212 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 9/3/214 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: MARCY S. FRIEDMAN Justice PART
More informationCase 1:11-cv WHP Document 100 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:11-cv-05988-WHP Document 100 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the matter of the application of THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (as Trustee under
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/02/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/02/2013 INDEX NO. 652619/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2014
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2014 0525 PM INDEX NO. 652450/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF 08/26/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationx
Case 1:12-cv-07943-ALC Document 77 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- x Lehman XS
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/03/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/03/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/03/2013 INDEX NO. 653787/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/03/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE TRUST SERIES
More informationU.S. Bank Nat l Ass n v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Index No /2011 Page 2 of 12
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: IAS PART THREE --------------------------------------------------------------------X U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, for HarborView
More informationCase 1:17-cv DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:17-cv-20713-DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 17-cv-20713-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES RICHARD KURZBAN, v. Plaintiff,
More informationNew York Supreme Court
New York County Clerk s Index No. 653831/13 To Be Argued By: DARRELL S. CAFASSO d New York Supreme Court APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, solely in its capacity as Securities
More informationKnights of Columbus v Bank of N.Y. Mellon 2015 NY Slip Op 31362(U) July 10, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2011 Judge:
Knights of Columbus v Bank of N.Y. Mellon 2015 NY Slip Op 31362(U) July 10, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651442/2011 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK RIMROCK HIGH INCOME PLUS (MASTER) FUND, LTD. AND RIMROCK LOW VOLATILITY (MASTER) FUND, LTD., Plaintiffs, against AVANTI COMMUNICATIONS GROUP PLC,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. LaSalle Bank National Association Doc. 540 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ) as Trustee for the Certificateholders
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 55 Filed: 02/25/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:525
Case: 1:12-cv-06357 Document #: 55 Filed: 02/25/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:525 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PINE TOP RECEIVABLES OF ILLINOIS, LLC, a limited
More informationCase 0:16-cv WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:16-cv-61856-WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 JENNIFER SANDOVAL, vs. Plaintiff, RONALD R. WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, P.L., SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 7/29/16 Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage CA2/1 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 33,945. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY Violet C. Otero, District Judge
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note
More informationCase 1:15-cv JCC-TCB Document 34 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 357
Case 1:15-cv-01463-JCC-TCB Document 34 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 357 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division MERIDIAN INVESTMENTS, INC. )
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs Appellants,
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2329 SOSTENES PENA; YOLANDA PENA, v. Plaintiffs Appellants, HSBC BANK USA, National Association as Trustee for Deutsche Alt-A Securities
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 18-20026 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 5, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
More informationCase 1:13-cv TPG Document 21 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 15 : : : : Defendants. :
Case 1:13-cv-07740-TPG Document 21 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------x : SUPERIOR PLUS US HOLDINGS, INC.,
More informationCase 2:17-cv JP Document 76-1 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : :
Case 217-cv-03232-JP Document 76-1 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL R. NELSON, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. NO. 17-3232 DAVID
More informationCase 3:16-cv GTS Document 14 Filed 09/11/17 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:16-cv-01372-GTS Document 14 Filed 09/11/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN J. KOHOUT; and SUSAN R. KOHOUT, v. Appellants, 3:16-CV-1372 (GTS) NATIONSTAR
More informationCase 6:05-cv CJS-MWP Document 23 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendant.
Case 6:05-cv-06344-CJS-MWP Document 23 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SCOTT E. WOODWORTH and LYNN M. WOODWORTH, -vs- ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2016 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 651587/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PERSEUS TELECOM LTD., v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re DIGITAL MUSIC ANTITRUST : LITIGATION : x MDL Docket No. 1780 (LAP) ECF Case DEFENDANT TIME WARNER S SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 2459 IN RE: PATRICIA JEPSON, Debtor Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR CWABS, INC., ASSET
More informationmg Doc 9056 Filed 08/25/15 Entered 08/25/15 15:53:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 6. Debtors.
Pg 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al., Debtors. Case No. 12-12020 (MG) Jointly Administered ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
09-4201-cv Hines v. Overstock.com UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER
More informationCase 1:11-cv WHP Document 96 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:11-cv-05988-WHP Document 96 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the matter of the application of THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (as Trustee under
More informationCase 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 246 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:16-cv-02105-JAR-JPO Document 246 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STEVEN WAYNE FISH, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
More informationCase 4:05-cv Y Document 110 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-00470-Y Document 110 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION RICHARD FRAME, WENDALL DECKER, SCOTT UPDIKE, JUAN NUNEZ,
More informationMorgan Stanley Mtge. Loan Trust SL v Morgan Stanley Mtge. Capital Holdings LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 32159(U) August 8, 2014 Supreme Court, New York
Morgan Stanley Mtge. Loan Trust 2006-10SL v Morgan Stanley Mtge. Capital Holdings LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 32159(U) August 8, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652612/2012 Judge: Eileen Bransten
More informationCase 1:15-cv KBJ Document 16 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00875-KBJ Document 16 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATASHA DALLEY, Plaintiff, v. No. 15 cv-0875 (KBJ MITCHELL RUBENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES,
More informationCase 1:07-cv PLF Document 212 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:07-cv-01144-PLF Document 212 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., AARON J. WESTRICK, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 04-0280
More informationFILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 01/21/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/21/2016
FILED WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 01/21/2016 1152 AM INDEX NO. 70104/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF 01/21/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WESTCHESTER COUNTY ------------------------------------X
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 03/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:84
Case: 1:16-cv-04522 Document #: 21 Filed: 03/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:84 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LISA SKINNER, Plaintiff, v. Case No.
More informationBank of NY Mellon v WMC Mtge., LLC NY Slip Op Decided on September 7, Supreme Court, New York County. Kornreich, J.
[*1] Bank of NY Mellon v WMC Mtge., LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 26282 Decided on September 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Kornreich, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
More informationCase 7:14-cv VB Document 25 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : :
Case 714-cv-04694-VB Document 25 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
14-4520-cv Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Thompson UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER
More informationCase 1:13-cv S-LDA Document 16 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Case 1:13-cv-00185-S-LDA Document 16 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ) DOUGLAS J. LUCKERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 13-185
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Before the Court is Twin City Fire Insurance Company s ( Twin City ) Motion for
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRADEN PARTNERS, LP, et al., v. Plaintiffs, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-jst ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re: Chapter 11
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re: RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY LLC, Debtor. ---------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA #01 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 Julio Carranza, WSBA #1 R. Joseph Sexton, WSBA # 0 Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel 01 Fort Road/P.O. Box 1 Toppenish, WA (0) - Attorneys
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 7/29/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL SECOND DIST. MOSHE YHUDAI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DIVISION ONE B262509
More informationCase 1:04-cv RJH Document 32-2 Filed 09/15/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-06626-RJH Document 32-2 Filed 09/15/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN RAPAPORT, RAPAPORT USA and INTERNET DIAMOND EXCHANGE, L.L.C., CIVIL
More informationCase 1:14-cv JMF Document 29 Filed 04/20/15 Page 1 of 9. : : Plaintiff, : : Defendants.
Case 114-cv-09839-JMF Document 29 Filed 04/20/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X GRANT &
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 200 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the matter of the application of WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE BANK
More information: : Plaintiff, Third-Party Plaintiff, : Third-Party Defendants. : In an Opinion and Order entered on November 28, 2017, familiarity with which is
AGCS Marine Insurance Company v. GEODIS CALBERSON HUNGARIA LOGISZTIKAIKFT Doc. 75 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 142 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2011
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2011 INDEX NO. 651786/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 142 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2011 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFiled 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 9. Case 1:05-cv GEL Document 451. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x. 05 Civ.
Case 1:05-cv-08626-GEL Document 451 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re REFCO, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 05 Civ. 8626 (GEL) ---------------------
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. (Filed: April 18, 2012)
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. (Filed: April 18, 2012) SUPERIOR COURT THE BANK OF NEW YORK : MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF : NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR IN : TO JP MORGAN CHASE
More informationCase 1:16-cv NRB Document 46 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:16-cv-02578-NRB Document 46 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------X RONALD BETHUNE, on behalf of himself and all
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/21/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/21/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK BLACKROCK CORE BOND PORTFOLIO, et al., -against- Plaintiffs, Index No. 1656587/2016 Part 53 (Ramos, J.) Motion Sequence 001 Oral Argument Requested
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
CHRISTINE WARREN, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 18, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellant, v.
More information: : : : : : : This action was commenced by Relator-Plaintiff Hon. William J. Rold ( Plaintiff ) on
United States of America et al v. Raff & Becker, LLP et al Doc. 111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------- x UNITED STATES
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/ :07 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/21/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/2016 0507 PM INDEX NO. 651546/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/21/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 23, 2012 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 23, 2012 Session FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANK v. BILL CHAPMAN, JR.; LISA CHAPMAN; CHAPMAN VENTURES,
More informationCase: 5:17-cv SL Doc #: 22 Filed: 12/01/17 1 of 9. PageID #: 1107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:17-cv-01695-SL Doc #: 22 Filed: 12/01/17 1 of 9. PageID #: 1107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BOUNTY MINERALS, LLC, CASE NO. 5:17cv1695 PLAINTIFF, JUDGE
More informationCase 2:04-cv AJS Document 63 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:04-cv-00593-AJS Document 63 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 9 R.M.F. GLOBAL, INC., INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs, 04cv0593
More informationPlaintiff, v. DECISION AND ORDER 13-CV-310S RON HISH, ARIZONA UTILITY INSPECTION SERVICES, INC., and LINDA HISH, I. INTRODUCTION
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. v. Hish et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. DECISION AND ORDER 13-CV-310S RON HISH, ARIZONA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BRETT DANIELS and BRETT DANIELS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-CV-1334 SIMON PAINTER, TIMOTHY LAWSON, INTERNATIONAL SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS,
More informationORDER. VIKKI RICKARD, Plaintiff,
Case 1:12-cv-01016-SS Document 28 Filed 03/13/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEX13 MAR 13 AUSTIN DIVISION L. E. [2; VIKKI RICKARD, Plaintiff, VESIL : -vs-
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/03/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/03/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/03/2016 0600 PM INDEX NO. 651784/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/03/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------X
More informationOn March 7, 2011, Plaintiff Dorchester Financial Securities, Inc. ( Plaintiff ) brought
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X DORCHESTER FINANCIAL SECURITIES, INC. -against- BANCO BRJ, S.A., Plaintiff, 11
More informationCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, THE BANK OF NEW YORK Index No. 657387/2017
More informationCase 2:16-cv JCC Document 17 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 JASON E. WINECKA, NATALIE D. WINECKA, WINECKA TRUST,
More informationPACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3
Case :-cv-0-kjm-dad Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of M. REED HOPPER, Cal. Bar No. E-mail: mrh@pacificlegal.org ANTHONY L. FRANÇOIS, Cal. Bar No. 0 E-mail: alf@pacificlegal.org Pacific Legal Foundation Sacramento,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
ifreedom DIRECT, f/k/a New Freedom Mortgage Corporation, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT September 4, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Licciardi v. City of Rochester et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARK A. LICCIARDI, Individually and as a City of Rochester Firefighter, -vs- Plaintiff, CITY OF ROCHESTER,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. On September 5, 2017, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ( Wells Fargo ) moved to
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MANUEL A. JUDAN, et al., v. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LENDER, Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-hsg ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. June 15, 2016
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., v. Stephen A. Ablitt et al. Doc. 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-FXD1 ASSET-BACKED
More informationCase 2:18-cv JHS Document 26 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:18-cv-01333-JHS Document 26 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERIC SCALLA, v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1333 KWS, INC.,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/2015 06:14 PM INDEX NO. 652396/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK JOHN HARADA, Index No. 652396/2014
More informationCase 1:16-cv JPO Document 75 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 11 X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X. Plaintiffs,
Case 116-cv-03852-JPO Document 75 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- COMCAST CORPORATION,
More informationCase 1:06-cv TPG Document 45 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 11. : : Defendant. :
Case 106-cv-03276-TPG Document 45 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x MOHAMMAD LADJEVARDIAN, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS PART 60
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS PART 60 In the Matter of the Application of WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
More informationX : : : : : : : : : : : : X. Plaintiff, itself and similarly-situated investors against The Bank of New York Mellon ( Defendant or
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- ROYAL PARK INVESTMENTS SA/NV Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
More informationCase 2:16-cv LDW-ARL Document 12 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 130
Case 2:16-cv-01414-LDW-ARL Document 12 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 130 Christine A. Rodriguez BALESTRIERE FARIELLO 225 Broadway, 29th Floor New York, New York 10007 Telephone: (212) 374-5400
More informationCase 2:09-cv KMM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2010 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:09-cv-14370-KMM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2010 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION MARCELLUS M. MASON, JR. Plaintiff, vs. CHASE HOME
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO CARRIE HARKLESS, TAMECA MARDIS and ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, v. Plaintiffs, JENNIFER BRUNNER, in her official
More informationCase 1:09-md LAK-GWG Document 909 Filed 05/16/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG Document 909 Filed 05/16/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Applies
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiff,
Residential Funding Company, LLC v. Standard Pacific Mortgage, Inc. Doc. 81 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 13-3468 (JRT/JJK) RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, v. COMMUNITY
More informationCase 1:13-cv WHP Document 20 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:13-cv-00317-WHP Document 20 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MENG-LIN LIU, 13-CV-0317 (WHP) Plaintiff, ECF CASE - against - ORAL ARGUMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-01936-M Document 24 Filed 07/20/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 177 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., v. Plaintiff,
More informationAndrew Walzer v. Muriel Siebert Co
2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-6-2011 Andrew Walzer v. Muriel Siebert Co Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-4526 Follow
More informationCase 1:12-cv LTS Document 135 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 15. No. 12CV4000-LTS-MHD
Case 1:12-cv-04000-LTS Document 135 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
More informationCase 1:12-cv CMA Document 132 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2013 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:12-cv-21695-CMA Document 132 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2013 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION A AVENTURA CHIROPRACTIC CENTER,
More informationMarcia Copeland v. DOJ
2017 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-13-2017 Marcia Copeland v. DOJ Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2017
More informationCase 1:12-cv WJM-KMT Document 64 Filed 09/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11
Case 1:12-cv-02663-WJM-KMT Document 64 Filed 09/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 Civil Action No. 12-cv-2663-WJM-KMT STAN LEE MEDIA, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, Defendant. IN THE UNITED
More information