Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
|
|
- Julianna Reed
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No Cm COOKE(s) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. ALl NASREDDINE KASSIR, Defendant. / PLEA AGREEM ENT The United States of America and Ali Nasreddine Kassir, a/k/a talec Kassirn' (hereinafter refen-ed to as the defendant') enter into the folowing agreement: The defendant agrees to plead guilty to counts 4 and 12 of the Indictm ent, w hich charges the defendant with passport fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1542 (Count 4), and conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(h) (Count 12). The Government agrees to dismiss the remaining counts, Counts 1-3 and 5-1 1, against the defendant at the tim e of sentencing. The defendant is awarethat the sentence will be imposed by the court after considering the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements (hereinafter dsentencing Guidelines'). The defendant acknowledges and understands that the court wil compute an advisory sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines and that the applicable guidelines w ill be determ ined by the court relying in part on the results of a Pre-sentence lnvestigation by the court's probation office, which investigation w ill com m ence after the guilty plea has been entered. The defendant is also aw are that, under certain circum stances, the court m ay depart from the advisory sentencing guideline range that it has com puted, and m ay raise or lower that advisory sentence
2 Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 2 of 7 under the Sentencing Guidelines. The defendant is further aw are and understands that the court is required to consider the advisory guideline range detennined under the Sentencing Guidelines, but is not bound to im pose that sentence; the court is pennitted to tailor the ultim ate sentence in light of other statutory concerns, and such sentence m ay be either m ore severe or less severe than the Sentencing Guidelines' advisory sentence. Know ing these facts, the defendant understands and acknowledges that the court has the authority to im pose any sentence w ithin and up to the statutory maximum autholized by 1aw for the ofensets) identified in paragraph 1 and that the defendant m ay not w ithdraw the plea solely as a result of the sentence im posed. The defendant also understands and acknow ledges that the court m ay im pose a statutory m axim um term of to 10 years as to Count 4, follow ed by a term of supervised release of up to 3 years and 20 years imprisonment as to Count 12, In addition to a term of imprisomnent and supervised release, the court m ay impose a fine of up to $250,000. The defendant further understands and acknow ledges that, in addition to any sentence imposed under paragraph 3 of this agreem ent, a special assessm ent in the am ount of $100 for each count, for a total of $200, wil be imposed on the defendant. The defendant agrees that any special assessm ent im posed sha l be paid at the tim e of sentencing. The Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter Isoffice'l reserves the right to inform the court and the probation ofice of a1l facts pertinent to the sentencing process, including all relevant inform ation concerning the offenses com m itted, w hether charged or not, as w ell as concerning the defendant and the defendant's background. Subject only to the express tenus of any agreed-upon sentencing recommendations
3 Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 3 of 7 contained in this agreem ent, this O ffice further reserves the right to m ake any recom m endation as to the quality and quantity of punishm ent. The United States agrees that it wil recom m end at sentencing that the court reduce by two levels the sentencing guideline level applicable to the defendant's offense, pursuant to Section 3E1.1(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines, based upon the defendant's recognition and aftinnative and tim ely acceptance of personal responsibility. lf at the tim e of sentencing the defendant's offense level is detennined to be 16 or greater, the governm ent w ill m ake a m otion requesting an additional one level decrease pursuant to Section 3E1. 1(b) of the Sentencing G uidelines, stating that the defendant has assisted authorities in the investigation or prosecution of his own m isconduct by tim ely notifying autholities of his intention to enter a plea of guilty, thereby perm itting the governm ent to avoid preparing for trial and perm iting the governm ent and the court to allocate their resources efticiently. The United States, how ever, w ill not be required to m ake these recom m endations if the defendant: a. fails or refuses to m ake a full, accurate and com plete disclosure to the probation office of the circum stances surrounding the relevant offense conduct; b. is found to have m isrepresented facts to the governm ent prior to entering into this plea agreem ent; or c. com m its any m isconduct after enteling into this plea agreem ent, including but not lim ited to com m itting a state or federal offense, violating any tenn of release, or m aking false statem ents or m isrepresentations to any governm ental entity or official. 3
4 Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 4 of 7 The United States and the defendant agree that, although not binding on the probation office or the court, they wil jointly recommend that the court make the following findings and conclusions as to the sentence to be im posed: a. Base o fense level: That, pursuant to Section 2S1. l and 2B 1. 1, the base offense level is 22 (6 plus 16 offense levels from the table in Section because the offense involved between $1.5 milion and $3.5 milion). b. M oney launderinx enhancement: That, pursuant to Section 2S 1.1(b)(2)(B), a two-level enhancement applies for a money laundering conviction under 18 U.S.C. j c. Sophisticated means: That, pursuant to Section 251.1(b)(3), a two-level enhancement applies for the use of sophisticated m eans of laundering. d. Aam-avated role enhancem ent (m anager or supervisor): That, pursuant to Section 3B1. l (b), a three-level enhancement applies for being a manager or supervisor in a conspiracy involving tive or m ore people. e. Total offense level: That the total offense level, after a three-level reduction for early acceptance of responsibility, is 26. A ssum ing a Crim inal History Category 1, the sentencing guideline range is 63 to 78 m onths. The defendant agrees to forfeiture in the am ount of $ 150,000, which the United States will seek as a forfeiture moneyjudgment pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(1). Defendant further agrees to satisfy the moneyjudgment byremitting to the United States the sum of $ 125, in United States currency in the fonn of a Cashier's Check payable to the United States M arshals Selwice within fourteen (14) days of the change of plea and agreeing that $25,000 wil come from the bond m oney currently posted with the Clerk of Court, which shal be irrevocably assigned to the U nited States and tunzed over for forfeiture upon com pletion of the Case.
5 Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 5 of 7 The defendant know ingly and voluntarily agrees to w aive any claim or defense to the forfeiture, of the $ l 50,000 described above, under the Eighth Am endment to the United States Constitution, including any claim of excessive fine or penalty with respect to any forfeited property, whether such property is forfeited through administrative or judicial proceedings. ln addition, the defendant agrees to waive any applicable time limits for administrative or judicial forfeiture proceedings. The defendant also agrees to w aive any appeal of the forfeiture. 10. The defendant is aware that the sentence has not yet been determ ined by the court. The defendant also is aw are that any estim ate of the probable sentencing range or sentence that the defendant m ay receive, whether that estim ate com es from the defendant's attorney, the governm ent, or the probation office, is a prediction, not a prom ise, and is not binding on the governm ent, the probation office or the court. The defendant understands further that any recom m endation that the governm ent m akes to the court as to sentencing, w hether pursuant to this agreement or otherwise, is not binding on the court and the court may disregard the recom m endation in its entirety. The defendant understands and acknow ledges, as previously acknow ledged in paragraph 3 above, that the defendant m ay not w ithdraw his plea based upon the court's decision not to accept a sentencing recom mendation m ade by the defendant, the govelmment, or a recommendation made jointly by both the defendant and the government. The defendant is aw are that Title 18, U nited States Code, Section 3742 and Title 28, U nited States Code, Section 1291 afford the defendant the right to appeal the sentence im posed in this case. A cknowledging this, in exchange for the undertakings m ade by the United States in this plea agreem ent, the defendant hereby w aives a l rights confen'ed by Sections 3742 and 1291 to appeal any sentence im posed, including any restitution or forfeiture order, or to appeal the m anner in which the sentence was imposed, unless the sentence exceeds the m axim um penuited by statute or is the result of an upward departure and/or an upward variance from the advisory 5
6 Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 6 of 7 guideline range that the Court establishes at sentencing. The defendant further understands that nothing in this agreem ent sha l affect the governm ent's right and/or duty to appeal as set forth in Title 18, United States Code, Section ) and Title 28, United States Code, Section However, if the United States appeals the defendant's sentence pursuant to Sections 3742(17) and 1291, the defendant shal be released from the above waiver of appe late rights. By signing this agreem ent, the defendant acknowledges that the defendant has discussed the appeal w aiver set forth in this agreem ent with the defendant's attolmey. The defendant further hereby w aives al1 rights conferred by Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291 to assert any claim that (1) the statute to which the defendant is pleading guilty is unconstitutional', and/or (2) the admitted conduct does not fall within the scope of the statute of conviction. The defendant further agrees, together w ith the United States, to request that the Court enter a specific finding that the defendant's w aiver of the defendant's light to appeal the sentence to be im posed in this case w as knowing and voluntary. 12. Defendant recognizes that pleading guilty m ay have consequences w ith respect to the defendant's im m igration or naturalization status if the defendant is not a natural-born citizen of the United States. Under federal law, a broad range of crim es are rem ovable offenses, including the offenses to which defendant is pleading guilty. W hile the offenses to which the defendant is pleading guilty to w il not result in crim inal denaturalization, the defendant m ay be subject to civil denaturalization procedures as a consequence of pleading guilty to a crime. Removal, denaturalization, and other immigration consequences are the subject of a separate proceeding, however, and defendant understands that no one, including the defendant's atorney or the Court, can predict to a certainty the effect of the defendant's conviction on the defendant's im m igration status. D efendant nevertheless affin'ns that the defendant w ants to plead guilty 6
7 Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 7 of 7 regardless of any im m igration consequences that the defendant's plea m ay entail, even if the consequence is the defendant's denaturalization and autom atic rem oval from the U nited States. This is the entire agreem ent and understanding between this Office and the defendant. There are no other agreem ents, prom ises, representations, or understandings. Date:( t.v-f f' By: ARIANA FAJARDO ORSHAN UNITE TES ATTORNEY M ICHAEL E. THAKUR ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Date: lï ( I q l l e B. Jn behpt F W EINER, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT oate: ïh l!uh l l T. ' A E NAHRA, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR EFENDANT oate: -, /y ).èl% By: ALI NASRE DEFEN D T E KASSIR 7
Case 1:16-cr BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-20803-Cm BB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. MARJAN CABY,
More informationSection 1B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines.
Case 1:14-cr-20160-DPG Document 123 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2014 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Cése No. 14-20160-Cr-GAYLES UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. LUIS
More informationThe Office of the United States A torney for the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter
Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case Number: 16-20010-CR-M ORENO FERNANDO
More informationviolate the Anti-kickback Statute, Title 42, United States Code, Section 1320a-7b(b), w lich makes
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLOD A Case No. 1GCR-20549-SCOLA/OTAZO-REYES (s)(s)(s) UNITED STATES OF AG RICA VS. ODETTE BARCHA, Defendant. / PLEA AGREEG NT The Urlited States of Am
More informationCase 0:17-cr BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:17-cr-60022-BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 17-60022-CR-BLOOM UNITED STATES O F AM ERICA V. ESTEBAN
More informationCase 9:16-cr RLR Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
%. Case 9:16-cr-80107-RLR Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 16-80107-CR-ROSENBERG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS.
More informationStates Department of Justice, Cdminal Division, Fraud Section (colectively, <ethis Office'l and
Case 1:18-cr-20682-CMA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2018 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES OE AMERICA VS. M ATTHIAS KRULL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 18-CR-20682-ALTONAGA
More informationCase 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKET NO. 3:1 OCR59-W v. PLEA AGREEMENT RODNEY REED CAVERLY NOW COMES the United States of America,
More informationCase 1:12-cr DMM Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2012 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:12-cr-20398-DMM Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2012 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 12-20398-CR-M1DDLEBROOKS
More information1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:
Case 1:16-cr-00024-CG Document 2 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATALIE REED PERHACS
More informationGUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:
United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia CLERK'S OFFICE Oainmao JUL 12 201 JAMES N. HATTEN, Ciork GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y: DQP0/ Giork UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110
Case 2:12-cr-00030-JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CASE NO. 2: 12-CR-30-FtM-99
More informationCase 2:14-cr JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 62
Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageD: 62 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District ofnew Jersey 970 Broad Street, 7hfloor 973-645-2700 Newark, New Jersey
More informationCase 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT
Case 1:09-mj-00015-JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) V. ) ) DWAYNE F. CROSS, ) ) Defendant. ) Case
More informationUnited States District Court
Case 1:12-cr-00192-RJJ Doc #223 Filed 03/27/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID#1356 AO 245B (MIWD Rev. 01/13)- Judgment in a Criminal Case United States District Court W estern District of Michigan UNITED STATES OF
More informationCase 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice Billy J. Williams United States Attorney District of Oregon 1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204-2902
More information5 CRWIINAL NO. H
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DrVISIOlV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 v. 5 CRWIINAL NO. H-07-218-002 WILLIE CARSON, I11 5 PLEA AGREEMENT The United States of America, by
More information3.1 ARTICLE AMENDMENT
ARTICLE 3 AMENDMENT SECTION 300 Procedure for Amendment or District Changes This order m ay be am ended utilizing the procedures specified in this article. SECTION 301 General W henever the public necessity,
More informationinvolved in the transaction, full restitution, a special
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CRIMINAL NO. 1-08 CR 428 ) V- ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1956(h) VIJAY K. TANEJA, j
More informationCase 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:17-cr-00102-MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19 ^^^'-^ ^^^^ ^'-^^ AGREEMENT Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CRIMINAL
More informationSOUTHEIWDISTQIGT 17 - F 0 FLORIDA or 2R-sc0u
Case 1:17-cr-20215-RNS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHEIWDISTQIGT 17 - F 0 FLORIDA or 2R-sc0u CASE NO. -.. 18 U.S.C. j 1956(h) 18 c.s.c. j 982(a)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Cr. No. H-02-0665 BEN F. GLISAN, JR., Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT Pursuant
More informationRe: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tl e SllvioJ. Mollo B11ilding One Safm Andrew's Pfo::a New York. NtlP York 10007 March 7, 2014 Arthur G. Jakoby, Esq. David
More informationCase 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI
Case 2:12-cr-00059-AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 FILED IN OPEN COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MAY -9 2012
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of Florida Miami Division
Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 129 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2017 Page 1 of 6 USDC FLSD 245B (Rev. 09/08) - Judgment in a Criminal Case Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of
More informationCase 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California
Case 8:15-cr-00142-JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Docket No. SACR 15-00142-JLS Defendant
More informationCase 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16
Case 3:17-cr-00083-HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16 IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VICTOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal Number: v. : VIOLATION: Count One: JAMES STEVEN GRILES, : 18 U.S.C. 1505 (Obstruction of Proceedings Defendant.
More informationCase: 5:16-cr KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342
Case: 5:16-cr-00013-KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 16-13-KKC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON Eastern
More informationCR-COHN/SELTZER
Case 9:16-cr-80206-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2016 Page 1 of 5TB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 16-80206-CR-COHN/SELTZER CASE NO. 18 U.S.C. j 875(c) Dec 1, 2016
More informationAT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16
Judge Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEA TILE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO. CR0-0 RSM ) I Plaintiff, v. PLEA AGREEMENT RICHARD W. GIBSON, Defendant. The United
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, KEVIN CLARK, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT '3: 11~_;-z_ (0! The United States
More informationCase 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL
Case 3:17-cr-05226-RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL 06 2017 CLERY. U.S. DfST~ICT COURT WESTERN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-06-CR-W-FJG ) MICHAEL FITZWATER, ) ) ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT
BRYAN SCHRODER United States Attorney ADAM ALEXANDER Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 222 West Seventh Avenue, #9, Room 253 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7567 Phone: (907) 271-5071
More informationCase &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT
Case &:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12 FARKANSA INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) JAMES IN OPEN COURT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
USDC IN/ND case 2:17-cr-00153-JVB-APR document 7 filed 11/17/17 page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V ) ) Cause No. 2:17
More informationEASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. ) IYMAN FARIS, ) a/k/a Mohammad Rauf, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationFILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008
Case 1:08-cr-00369-RJL Document 9 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 10 IL U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Fraud Section DecemberJ, 2008 Scott W. Muller, Esq. Angela T. Burgess, Esq. Davis Polk & Wardwell
More informationCase 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby
Case 2:13-cr-00171-CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 FILED 2013 Aug-02 AM 10:20 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA lub ~1Jf' -2 ANcl:l:fij UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 1.0 FeJRurftE NORTHERN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-01-CR-W-FJG ) WILLIAM ENEFF, ) ) ) Defendant. )
More informationCase 2:15-cr JLL Document 5 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 27. U.S. Department of Justice. United Slates Attorney District ofpieu Jersey
Case 2:15-cr-00631-JLL Document 5 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 27 CLf U.S. Department of Justice United Slates Attorney District ofpieu Jersey 970 Broad Street, 7th/loor 9 S-645-2 700 Newark, Neu
More informationTwo of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saini Andrew's Pla=a New York. New York 10007 October 16, 2012 BYE-MAIL, Esq. Federal Defenders
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH CONLEY No. 12 CR 986 Judge Gary Feinerman PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the
More informationCase 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn
Case 1:17-cr-00232-RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10 U.S. Department of Justice The Special Counsel's Office Washington, D.C. 20530 November 30, 2017 Robert K. Kelner Stephen P. Anthony Covington
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:12-CV-818
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:12-CV-818 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, BRITTHAVEN, INC. d/b/a BRITTHAVEN
More informationUnited States District Court Southern District of Florida MIAMI DIVISION
Case 1:09-cr-20346-JEM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2012 Page 1 of 6 USDC FLSD 245B (Rev. 09/08) - Judgment in a Criminal Case Page I of 6 Date of Original Judgment: JULY 30, 2010 (Or Date
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR
DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division (Cal. State Bar # ) 00 North Los Angeles Street Federal Building, Room 1 Los Angeles, California
More informationLIMITED OFFICIAL USE
Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 8 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Western District ofpennsylvania u.s. Post Office & Courthouse 700 Granl Sireel Suite 4000
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-06023-02-CR-SJ-DW ) STEPHANIE E. DAVIS, ) ) Defendant.
More informationUNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT EASTERN DI STRI CT OF MI SSOURI EASTERN DI VI SI ON
Howell v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al Doc. 24 UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT EASTERN DI STRI CT OF MI SSOURI EASTERN DI VI SI ON TERRI LL HOWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4: 15- CV-1138 ( CEJ)
More information8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19
8:15-cr-00116-JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA vs. Plaintiff, LA WREN CE MERRICK JR.,
More informationUnited States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
Case 1:15-cr-00102-CG-B Document 325 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 5 AO 245B (Rev. 06/05) Judgment in a Criminal Case: Sheet 1 (1518581) United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES
More informationCase 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California
Case 8:07-cr-00069-AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159 ***CONDITION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE NO. 4 AMENDED 1/11/11*** United States District Court Central District of California UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Eastern Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. Case No. 2:04-cr-88 NURADIN M. ABDI JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY Defendant. PLEA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice KARIN J. IMMERGUT, OSB #96314 United States Attorney District of Oregon CHARLES F. GORDER, JR., OSB #91287 PAMALA
More informationCase 1:13-cr DLG Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:13-cr-20445-DLG Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 13-20445-cr-GM HAM/GOODM A N UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCase 2:08-cr DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California
Case 2:08-cr-01160-DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5 United States District Court Central District of California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Docket No. CR 08-01160 DDP Defendant akas: none
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 02-37A ) JOHN LINDH, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT Paul J.
More informationCase 8:16-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:269 United States District Court Central District of California
Case 8:16-cr-00008-JLS Document 59 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:269 United States District Court Central District of California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Docket No. SACR 16-00008-JLS Defendant
More informationAGREEMENT ON FILM CO- PRODUCTIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLI C OF SOUTH AFRI CA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE I TALI AN REPUBLI C
AGREEMENT ON FILM CO- PRODUCTIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLI C OF SOUTH AFRI CA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE I TALI AN REPUBLI C 2 PREAMBLE THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLI C OF SOUTH AFRI CA AND
More informationCase 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.
Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FILED SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR. NO. ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT DEFENSE COUNSEL: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY:,Esq.
More informationUnited States District Court LOOGED I CEMD
Sheet I - Judgment in a Crim inal Case wi th Supervised Release (Rev. 2/aJ05 ) Judgment Page I of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Shamai Kedem Leibowitz -,FILED... E,NTEllED United States District Court
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-00106-01-CR-W-DW TIMOTHY RUNNELS, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 10-00025-01-CR-W-HFS ) KHALID OUAZZANI, ) ) Defendant. )
More informationCase 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STA [ES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-CR- CRAIG HILBORN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT 1. The United States of America, by its attorneys,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Attorney, and the defendant, Kurt W. Donsbach, with the advice and
~, 3 4 5 6 ALAN D. BERSIN United PATRICK states Attorney K. O'TOOLE Assistant U.s. Attorney California state Bar No. 0858 United states Courthouse 880 Front street San Diego, California 91-8800 Telephone:
More informationCase 8:07-cr CJC Document 50 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:213. United States District Court Central District of California
Case 8:07-cr-00237-CJC Document 50 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:213 United States District Court Central District of California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Docket No. SACR 07-00237-CJC Defendant
More informationCase 1:16-cr FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. FERNANDO M ENDEZ VILLAM IL, a/k/a ufernando M endez,'' Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCR-MAR MATTHEW MAN
' Case 9:17-cr-80204-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2017 Page 1 of 14.., F.luun w sa n.c. Nov 2, 2017. SOUTHERN UNITED STATES DISTRICT DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CO UR T STEVEN CLERK U M b A DIsT.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46 (1:01CR45 & 3:01CR11-3)
Greer v. USA Doc. 19 Case 1:04-cv-00046-LHT Document 19 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARBARA BYRD-BENNETT No. 15 CR 620 Hon. Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between
More informationCase 2:15-cr KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996
Case 2:15-cr-00576-KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996 U.S. Department of Justice United &wes Attorney District ofnew Jersey Lawrence S. Lustberg, Esq. Gibbons P.C. One Gateway Center
More informationcase 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6
case 3:04-cr-00071-AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:04-CR-71(AS)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS VRANAS No. 15 CR 620 Judge Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Criminal No. 99-233 v. ) ) Filed: 5/20/99 TOKAI CARBON CO., LTD., ) ) Judge Clarence C. Newcomer
More informationCase 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6
Case 3:16-cr-00148-K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6 ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 2o:s APR 14 PM.3: 32 DALLAS DIVISION / Y CL rnx_...
More information3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5
3:09-cr-00469-MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BEAN BAG BOYS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) vs. ) No. 02 CR 892 ) Hon. Suzanne B. Conlon ENAAM M. ARNAOUT ) PLEA AGREEMENT This Plea Agreement
More informationFlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.
Case 2:09-cr-00717-ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 1 DENNIS K. BURKE United States Attorney District of Arizona 2 Howard D. Sukenic 3 Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No. 011990 Two
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, No
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, No. 07-201 56 -VS- HON. AVERN COHN D-3 SAMAR KHALIL SPINELLI, a/k/a "Samar Khalil Deladurantaye,"
More informationNON- PRECEDENTI AL DECI SI ON - SEE SUPERI OR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 676 WDA 2013
J-A04013-14 NON- PRECEDENTI AL DECI SI ON - SEE SUPERI OR COURT I.O.P. 6 5.3 7 ANDREW HRI SHENKO, LAURA A. COOMBS, v. Appellant I N THE SUPERI OR COURT OF PENNSYLVANI A Appellee No. 676 WDA 2013 Appeal
More information000002
000001 000002 000003 000004 000005 000006 000007 000008 000009 000010 000011 000012 000013 000014 000015 000016 000017 000018 000019 000020 000021 000022 000023 000024 000025 000026 000027 000028 000029
More informationCase 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT
Case 1:18-cr-00114-LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ig F«ssw ^23 P b! 09 MiOEPOSITORY DARREN B. STRATTON PLEA
More informationCase 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295
Case :-cr-00-fmo Document Filed 0 Page of Page ID #: EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division RITESH SRIVASTAVA (Cal. Bar
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
AO 245B Case 1:14-cr-00068-KBF Document 269 Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 9 (Rev. 09/1 I.Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED ST A TES OF AMERICA v. THE DEFENDANT: D pleaded
More informationSTATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.
STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 11-00261-02-CR-W-GAF ) WILLIAM TROY GOINGS, ) ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-000297 03-CR-W-FJG ) RONALD E. BROWN, JR., ) ) Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM
Case 1:90-cr-00260-WJZ Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/31/2012 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 89-602-CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM CASE NO. 90-260-CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING Monday, January 26, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, JAMES R. ROSENDALL, JR., HONORABLE AVERN COHN No. 09-20025 Defendant. / ARRAIGNMENT AND
More informationCase 2:13-cr TJH Document 59 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:280. United States District Court Central District of California
Case 2:13-cr-00344-TJH Document 59 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:280 United States District Court Central District of California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Docket No. CR 13-0344-TJH JS-3 Defendant
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN ) Filed April 0, 00 LIDIA SPIROFF (CSBN ) SIDNEY A. MAJALYA (CSBN 00) LARA M. KROOP (CSBN ) Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice 0 Golden Gate Avenue Box 0, Room -01 San Francisco,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice KARIN J. IMMERGUT, OSB #96314 United States Attorney District of Oregon CHARLES F. GORDER, JR., OSB #91287 PAMALA
More informationAction Settlement (ECF No. 451, including the parties' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
Case 1:16-cv-20413-JEM Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2016 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case Number: 16-20413-ClV-M ARTINEZ-GOODMAN
More informationPLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN
1 1 1 1 NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN 1) Original Filed //0 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS (CSBN ) MAY Y. LEE (CSBN ) BRIGID S. BIERMANN (CSBN 0) CHARLES P. REICHMANN (CSBN ) U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-00026-02-CR-W-FJG ) CYNTHIA S. MARTIN, ) ) Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA M iam i Division. Case Num ber: 14- ZZIZ9-CIV-M ARTINEZ-G OODM AN
Case 1:14-cv-22129-JEM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2015 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA M iam i Division Case Num ber: 14- ZZIZ9-CIV-M ARTINEZ-G
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-7-2007 USA v. Robinson Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-2372 Follow this and additional
More information