UNITED STATES V. WASHINGTON, SUBPROCEEDING 09-1
|
|
- Liliana Dennis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNITED STATES V. WASHINGTON, SUBPROCEEDING 09-1
2 United States v. Washington
3 The Quileute Tribe
4 The Quileute Tribe
5 2009: Makah v. Quileute and Quinault Makah filed a request for determination of: Quileute s northern and western ocean treaty fishing boundaries Quinault s western ocean treaty fishing boundary Where did Quileute and Quinault fish in the Pacific Ocean in 1855?
6 9 experts in four fields: Archaeology Biology Anthropology Linguistics 472 admitted exhibits 23-day trial 6
7 Northern fur seal
8 Northern Fur Seal Considered a pelagic species Never come ashore except to breed Would have to travel miles offshore to reliably obtain fur seals 8
9 9
10 Treaty of Olympia, 1856: The right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations, is further secured to said Indians. Makah s treaty (Treaty of Neah Bay) secures [t]he right of taking fish and of whaling or sealing at usual and accustomed grounds and stations. Does evidence of taking sea mammals count in determining usual and accustomed grounds and stations under the Treaty of Olympia? Isaac Stevens
11 Two legal principles at play 1. Canons of treaty construction Treaty terms must be construed in accordance with the meaning they were understood to have by the tribal representatives at the council. Tulee v. Wash., 315 U.S. 681, (1942). Ambiguities must be resolved in favor of the signatory tribes. Winters v. U.S., 207 U.S. at (1919) Makah argued that the canons do not apply where the signatory tribes understanding could adversely affect other tribes
12 Two legal principles at play 2. Reservation of rights doctrine The treaty was not a grant of rights to the Indians but a grant of right from them a reservation of those not granted. United States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371, 381 (1905) Abrogation of reserved rights must be explicit the United States treaty drafters had the sophistication and experience to use express language for the abrogation of treaty rights. Mille Lacs, 526 U.S. 172, 195 (2009) they shall not take shellfish from any beds staked or cultivated by citizens
13 Two legal principles at play 2. Reservation of rights doctrine continued Shellfish case: [B]ecause the right to take any species, without limit, preexisted the Stevens Treaties, the Court must read the right of taking fish without any species limitation. U.S. v. Wash., 157 F.3d at 644 (9th Cir. 1998) Makah argued that Quileute and Quinault had different words and implements for different species
14 Negotiating Treaties Through Chinook Jargon ENGLISH Many 1000s of words Translation bottleneck Chinook Jargon Just ~500 words Many highly ambiguous QUILEUTE or QUINAULT 1000s of words Decision I, 384 F. Supp. at 330: the Jargon was capable of conveying only rudimentary concepts, but not the sophisticated or implied meaning of treaty provisions about which highly learned jurists and scholars differ.
15 Are sea mammals fish? Meaning of fish in 1855 Chehalis River council James Swan: The Indians, however, were not to be restricted to the reservation, but were to be allowed to procure their food as they had always done. Stevens: They were of course to fish etc as usual. As to whales, they were theirs. Quileute and Quinault had no separate word or phrase for sea mammals /ʔaa litaʔ/; kemken = fish, food
16 Canons: Trial decision 83 pages The use of fish in the 1856 treaty indicates an intended breadth of the subsistence provision that should not be circumscribed on the basis of post hoc understandings and linguistic drift. The linguistic evidence proved that Quileute and Quinault drew no distinctions between groups of aquatic species and would have understood fish to encompass aquatic animals RE the Makah treaty, these treaties were negotiated by different individuals and in different contexts
17 Trial decision 83 pages Reservation of Rights: Except for the shellfish proviso, there is no indication anywhere in the language of the treaty or the evidence surrounding the negotiations of an intent to circumscribe this most important of usufructuary rights
18 Ninth Circuit win: Oct. 2017, 873 F.3d 1157
19 Ninth Circuit Decision: October 2017 Canons Fish as of 1855 is ambiguous and the ambiguity must be resolved in favor of the signatory tribes Implicit in the Indian canon is the recognition that this principle inures to the benefit of the tribes that are parties to the treaty. As a non-signatory party, the Makah cannot usurp application of the Indian canon with respect to the Treaty of Olympia. Makah reads our precedent too broadly to advocate for its seemingly limitless rule that the Indian canon is inapplicable whenever another tribe would be disadvantaged.
20 Ninth Circuit Decision: October 2017 Canons continued: Treaty parties understanding Chinook jargon lacked terminology to convey taxonomic distinctions Quileute and Quinault s corresponding words have an even wider sweep Same result even without a beneficial preference US negotiators said that the treaty would not call[] upon [the tribes] to give up their old modes of living and places of seeking food. Stevens informed the tribes that the treaty secures [their] fish and permits them to take fish where [they] have always done so and in common with the whites. that the tribes had distinct terms available does not undermine what terms were actually utilized and how the Quileute and Quinault would have translated them.
21 Ninth Circuit Decision: October 2017 Reservation of rights doctrine As a practical matter, interpreting fish to cover whales and seals also respects the reserved-rights doctrine. (citing United States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371, 381 (1905)) Whaling and sealing were part of Quileute and Quinault s pre-existing rights
22 Supreme Court appeal Argues that the Ninth Circuit made mistaken rulings implicating three exceptionally important questions regarding the interpretation of Indian treaties: (1) whether a court s duty to consider the intentions of the parties and the context in which a treaty was made includes the duty to consult the language of contemporaneous treaties that shed light on the drafters intent; (2) whether the asserted Indian understanding of a treaty can override the clearly expressed intent of the parties viewed in a real-world context; and (3) whether the Indian canon applies to favor certain Indian tribes when its application is detrimental to contemporaneously negotiated treaty rights of other tribes.
Case 2:09-sp RSM Document 296 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-sp-0000-RSM Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Case: 15-35824, 08/05/2016, ID: 10077044, DktEntry: 34, Page 1 of 66 No. 15-35824 15-35827 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and STATE OF WASHINGTON,
More informationNos & UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
Case: 15-35824, 08/05/2016, ID: 10077222, DktEntry: 36, Page 1 of 39 Nos. 15-35824 & 15-35827 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE,
More informationCase 2:09-sp RSM Document 171 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-sp-0000-RSM Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,
More informationMidwater Trawlers Co-Operative v. Department Of Commerce: A Troublesome Dichotomy Of Science And Policy
Ocean and Coastal Law Journal Volume 8 Number 1 Article 6 2002 Midwater Trawlers Co-Operative v. Department Of Commerce: A Troublesome Dichotomy Of Science And Policy Sarah McCarthy University of Maine
More informationCase 3:07-cr JKA Document 62 Filed 12/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :0-cr-0-JKA Document Filed //0 Page of 0 Jack W. Fiander Towtnuk Law Offices, Ltd. 0 Creekside Loop, Ste. 0 Yakima, WA 0- (0 - E-mail towtnuklaw@msn.com UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, WAYNE
More informationCase 2:09-sp RSM Document 285 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 6
Case :0-sp-0000-RSM Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Civil No. C0-
More informationCase 2:09-sp RSM Document 288 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 10
Case :0-sp-0000-RSM Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiffs, STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants.
More informationCase 1:05-cv TLL-CEB Document 150 Filed 01/30/2009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-10296-TLL-CEB Document 150 Filed 01/30/2009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff, and
More informationAppeal No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, TULALIP TRIBES, et al.,
Case: 18-35441, 10/24/2018, ID: 11059304, DktEntry: 20, Page 1 of 20 Appeal No. 18-35441 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TULALIP TRIBES,
More informationCase 3:07-cr JKA Document 91 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :0-cr-0-JKA Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 Jack W. Fiander Towtnuk Law Offices, Ltd. 0 Creekside Loop, Ste. 0 Yakima, WA 0- (0 - E-mail towtnuklaw@msn.com UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff,
More informationNos and UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs
Case: 13-35925 01/27/2014 ID: 8954555 DktEntry: 19-1 Page: 1 of 90 Nos. 13-35925 and 13-35928 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs v. STATE
More informationNos and UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, and
Case: 13-35925 04/10/2014 ID: 9053222 DktEntry: 58 Page: 1 of 32 Nos. 13-35925 and 13-35928 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, and HOH INDIAN TRIBE;
More informationCase 2:09-sp RSM Document 153 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE.
Case :0-sp-00001-RSM Document Filed // Page 1 of Honorable Ricardo Martinez UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al. vs. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et. al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 97 1337 MINNESOTA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationNos and UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs,
Case: 13-35925 02/18/2014 ID: 8982259 DktEntry: 33-1 Page: 1 of 73 Nos. 13-35925 and 13-35928 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :0-cr-0-JKA Document - Filed 0//0 Page of 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, FRANKIE GONZALES et al., MAKAH TRIBE S AMICUS BRIEF - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
More informationWas Buchanan Buffaloed?
Was Buchanan Buffaloed? I. CASE HISTORY A. Trial Court On July 10, 1995, defendant Donald Buchanan, an enrolled member of the Nooksack Tribe, filed a motion in Yakima County Superior Court to dismiss two
More informationCOMMENTS. The World Is Their Oyster? Interpreting the Scope of Native American Off-Reservation Shellfish Rights in Washington State
COMMENTS The World Is Their Oyster? Interpreting the Scope of Native American Off-Reservation Shellfish Rights in Washington State Jason W. Anderson* I. INTRODUCTION In the mid-nineteenth century, Territorial
More informationRobert T. Anderson, Professor, University of Washington School of Law Seattle, WA. April 2018
Robert T. Anderson, Professor, University of Washington School of Law Seattle, WA April 2018 Overview Indian property rights rooted in federal law, including aboriginal title as recognized in U.S. Deep
More informationCASE 0:13-cr JRT-LIB Document 46 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:13-cr-00072-JRT-LIB Document 46 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. Plaintiff, ) ) LARRY GOOD, ) ) Defendant. ) Criminal
More informationTHE NAVAJO TREATY OF 1868 PAUL SPRUHAN NAVAJO DOJ
THE NAVAJO TREATY OF 1868 PAUL SPRUHAN NAVAJO DOJ TREATY OF 1868, JUNE 1, 1868, HWÉÉLDI FEDERAL CONCEPTION OF TREATIES Bi-lateral agreement between sovereigns. President authorized to negotiate
More informationNo. In The Supreme Court Of The United States. October Term, State Of Washington, Petitioner, v. United States Of America, et al., Respondents.
No. In The Supreme Court Of The United States October Term, 1998 State Of Washington, Petitioner, v. United States Of America, et al., Respondents. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States
More information~upreme ~ourt of tbe Wniteb ~tate~ Jn 1!J;bt. No WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, Petitioner,
No. 16-1498 Jn 1!J;bt ~upreme ~ourt of tbe Wniteb ~tate~ ---- ---- WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, v. Petitioner, COUGAR DEN, INC., A YAKAMA '.NATION CORPORATION, Respondent. ---- ---- On Petition
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LUMMI NATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS SAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, ET AL.
No. 05-445 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES LUMMI NATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. SAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationDepartment of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program
Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program PROJECT NUMBER (99-1881) Executive Summary: TREATY-RESERVED RIGHTS ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LANDS Wendy J. Eliason, Donald Fixico, Sharon O Brien,
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Case: 13-35474, 09/29/2016, ID: 10142617, DktEntry: 136, Page 1 of 20 No. 13-35474 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellees,
More informationCase 2:17-sp RSM Document 25 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-sp-0000-rsm Document Filed 0// Page of HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. STATE
More informationCase 1:12-cv GZS Document Filed 04/29/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: Civ. Action No. 1:12-cv GZS
Case 1:12-cv-00254-GZS Document 131-1 Filed 04/29/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 7630 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE PENOBSCOT NATION Plaintiff, Civ. Action No. 1:12-cv-00254-GZS UNITED STATES
More informationNo ; IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 13-35474 10/15/2013 ID: 8821166 DktEntry: 37 Page: 1 of 23 No. 13-35474; 13-35519 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE; SAUK-
More informationCase 2:17-sp RSM Document 37 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-sp-0000-rsm Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiff, vs. STATE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 534 U. S. (2001) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 00 507 CHICKASAW NATION, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. In The Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. Respondents. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationFederal Indian Law First Circuit Court of Appeals Clarifies Penobscot Nation s Reservation Boundary Penobscot Nation v. Mills
Federal Indian Law First Circuit Court of Appeals Clarifies Penobscot Nation s Reservation Boundary Penobscot Nation v. Mills, 861 F.3d 324 (1st Cir. 2017). Jessica Barton* The principles of Federal Indian
More informationTHE SCOPE OF THE INDIAN HABITAT CONSERVATION RIGHT AFTER THE CULVERT DECISION by Kristiana M. Szegda
THE SCOPE OF THE INDIAN HABITAT CONSERVATION RIGHT AFTER THE CULVERT DECISION by Kristiana M. Szegda Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the King Scholar Program Michigan State University
More informationCase 2:05-sp RSM Document 193 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 11
Case :0-sp-0000-RSM Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiff, vs.
More informationNos ; IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Case: 13-35474 01/21/2014 ID: 8945937 DktEntry: 54 Page: 1 of 67 Nos. 13-35474; 13-35519 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellees,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Soaring Eagle Casino and Resort, An Enterprise of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan Respondent, and Case No. 07-CA-053586
More informationCase 3:16-cv SI Document 82 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 19
Case 3:16-cv-01644-SI Document 82 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 19 Beth S. Ginsberg, OSB No. 070890 beth.ginsberg@stoel.com Michael R. Campbell, OSB No. 870016 michael.campbell@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 600
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case 1:13-cr-00018-RFC Document 24 Filed 04/08/13 Page 1 of 10 Mark D. Parker Brian M. Murphy PARKER, HEITZ & COSGROVE, PLLC 401 N. 31st Street, Suite 805 P.O. Box 7212 Billings, Montana 59103-7212 Ph:
More informationApplication of the ADEA to Indian Tribes: EEOC v. Fond du Lac Heavy Equipment & Construction Co., 986 F.2d 246 (1993)
Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 46 A Symposium on Health Care Reform Perspectives in the 1990s January 1994 Application of the ADEA to Indian Tribes: EEOC v. Fond du Lac
More informationLesson 2: Great Lakes American Indian Geography
Lesson 2: Great Lakes American Indian Geography Grades: 9-12 Subject: US History Length: two to three, 45-minute periods Objectives: A.8.2 A.8.4 A.8.7 Construct mental maps of selected locales, regions,
More informationTohono O odham Nation v. City of Glendale, 804 F.3d 1292 (9th Cir. 2015)
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2015-2016 Tohono O odham Nation v. City of Glendale, 804 F.3d 1292 (9th Cir. 2015) Kathryn S. Ore University of Montana - Missoula, kathryn.ore@umontana.edu
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-35336, 01/22/2018, ID: 10733950, DktEntry: 23, Page 1 of 59 No. 17-35336 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian Tribe,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Applicant, v. Case No. 13-MC-61 FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY, d/b/a Potawatomi Bingo Casino, Respondent.
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-572 In the Supreme Court of the United States CITIZENS AGAINST RESERVATION SHOPPING, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. K. JACK HAUGRUD, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 17-532 In the Supreme Court of the United States CLAYVIN HERRERA, PETITIONER v. STATE OF WYOMING ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF WYOMING, SHERIDAN COUNTY BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES
More informationNo In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JAMES H. GALLAHER, JR.
Case: 09-30193 10/05/2009 Page: 1 of 17 ID: 7083757 DktEntry: 18 No. 09-30193 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JAMES H. GALLAHER,
More informationCase 2:17-sp RSM Document 40 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I.
Case :-sp-0000-rsm Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT
More informationCase 1:14-cv JDL Document 30 Filed 10/08/15 Page 1 of 57 PageID #: 867 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 1:14-cv-00264-JDL Document 30 Filed 10/08/15 Page 1 of 57 PageID #: 867 STATE OF MAINE, and AVERY DAY, in his capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00594-CG-M Document 15 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTINE WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 2:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 2:13-cv-00106 Doc #1 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN BRENDA TURUNEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 17-387 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE, v. Petitioner, SHARLINE LUNDGREN AND RAY LUNDGREN, Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
More informationKaruk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Fall 2011 Case Summaries Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service Alexa Sample Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 17-532 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- CLAYVIN HERRERA,
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 05-434 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- SKOKOMISH INDIAN
More informationIndependent Scientific Advisory Board
Independent Scientific Advisory Board Northwest Power Planning Council National Marine Fisheries Service Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes Preface Terms of Reference August 20, 1996, amended December
More informationTHE ROAD TO SOVEREIGNTY: WASHINGTON STATE TREATIES
THE ROAD TO SOVEREIGNTY: WASHINGTON STATE TREATIES Photos counterclockwise: Billy Frank Jr.. Chief Leschi dancers and drummers perform at the Karshner Museum and Center for Culture & Art; Harvest Moon,
More informationExecutive Order 12898
HUD > Program Offices > Fair Housing > Fair Housing Laws and Presidential Executive Orders > Executive Order 12898 Executive Order 12898 FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 59, No. 32 Presidential Documents PRESIDENT
More informationUNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET DKT. NO. WALCD-CR ) ) Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the State's prosecution, alleging a lack of both
STATE OF MAINE WALDO,ss. STATE OF MAINE, V. HENRY BEAR UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET DKT. NO. WALCD-CR-16-636 ) ) ) ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S ) MOTION TO DISMISS ) ) Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the
More informationCREE v FLORES
Page 1 of 17 http://caselaw.findlaw.com U.S. 9th Circuit Court of A CREE v FLORES 9735305 RONALD CREE, JR.; DALTON CREE; JACK HAGGERTY; DOUGLAS BEEBE; JOSEPH YALLUP; CARL BOYLE; RICHARD "KIP" RAMSEY, dba
More informationNo CLAYVIN HERRERA, Petitioner, STATE OF WYOMING, Respondent.
No. 17-532 FILED JUN z 5 2018 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S. CLAYVIN HERRERA, Petitioner, STATE OF WYOMING, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The District Court Of Wyoming, Sheridan
More informationThe Administrative Process by Which Groups May Be Acknowledged as Indian Tribes by the Department of the Interior
The Administrative Process by Which Groups May Be Acknowledged as Indian Tribes by the Department of the Interior Jane M. Smith Legislative Attorney April 26, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-55604, 03/09/2018, ID: 10793101, DktEntry: 23-1, Page 1 of 35 NO. 17-55604 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE and CHICKEN RANCH RANCHERIA OF ME-WUK INDIANS,
More informationNatural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2013-2014 Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles Jill A. Hughes University of Montana School of Law, hughes.jilla@gmail.com
More informationKaruk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Fall 2011 Case Summaries Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service Justin Harkins Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr
More information33 CFR Part 320 General Regulatory Policies
33 CFR Part 320 General Regulatory Policies AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 1344; 33 U.S.C. 1413. Section 320.1 - Purpose and scope. (a) Regulatory approach of the Corps of Engineers. (1) The
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, Plaintiff Appellee
Case: 15-35540, 12/07/2015, ID: 9782324, DktEntry: 26-1, Page 1 of 31 No. 15-35540 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, Plaintiff Appellee v. Suquamish
More informationMichigan Indian Treaties and. the Asian Carp
Michigan State University College of Law INDIGENOUS LAW & POLICY CENTER OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES Michigan Indian Treaties and the Asian Carp Erin Lillie, 3L Indigenous Law & Policy Center Working Paper
More informationCase 3:16-cv SI Document 79 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 55
Case 3:16-cv-01644-SI Document 79 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 55 Josh Newton, OSB# 983087 jn@karnopp.com Benjamin C. Seiken, OSB# 124505 bcs@karnopp.com Karnopp Petersen LLP 360 SW Bond Street, Suite 400
More informationThe Struggle to Exercise a Treaty Right: An Analysis of the Makah Tribe's Path to Whale
The Struggle to Exercise a Treaty Right: An Analysis of the Makah Tribe's Path to Whale Emily Brand* TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF C ONTENTS... 287 IN TRO D U CTION... 289 I. M AKAH W HALING H ISTORY... 291
More information1 F.Supp.2d CV No DAE.
1 F.Supp.2d 1088 KANOA INC., dba Body Glove Cruises, Plaintiff, v. William Jefferson CLINTON, in his official capacity as President of the United States; William Cohen, in his official capacity as Secretary
More informationResolutions Committee Recommendation Resolution #: MKE Title: Protecting Chippewa lands and resources from the threats posed by PolyMet Mine
N A T I O N A L C O N G R E S S O F A M E R I C A N I N D I A N S Resolutions Committee Recommendation Resolution #: MKE-17-007 Title: Protecting Chippewa lands and resources from the threats posed by
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 17-269 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF WASHINGTON,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 97 1337 MINNESOTA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationNos , , , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Nos. 13-3800, 13-3801, 13-3802, 13-3803 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, MICHAEL D. BROWN; JERRY A. REYES; MARC L. LYONS; FREDERICK
More informationAmerican Indian & Alaska Native. Tribal Government Policy
American Indian & Alaska Native Tribal Government Policy U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AMERICAN INDIAN & ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT POLICY PURPOSE This Policy sets forth the principles to be followed
More informationCase 8:15-cv CJC-KES Document 27 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:280
Case :-cv-0-cjc-kes Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #:0 WILSHIRE BLVD PH BEVERLY HILLS, CA 0-0 DENNIS L. WILSON (Cal. Bar No. 0) DWilson@kilpatricktownsend.com KOLLIN J. ZIMMERMANN (Cal. Bar No. 0)
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 17-532 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- CLAYVIN HERRERA,
More informationTHE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, Appellant.
No. 34563-3-11 THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION TWO? 4 "r STATE OF WASHINGTON,,--_.."'_i Respondent, ; V. ] GERALD CAYENNE, Appellant. ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
More information11/16/10. [1] U. S. Constitution, Article II, 2, Cl. 2.
A treaty is a contract between sovereign nations. The Constitution authorizes the President, with the consent of two-thirds of the Senate, to make a treaty on behalf of the Unites States.[1] [1] U. S.
More informationTHE ELUSIVE IMPLIED WATER RIGHT FOR FISH: DO OFF-RESERVATION INSTREAM WATER RIGHTS EXIST TO SUPPORT INDIAN TREATY FISHING RIGHTS?
THE ELUSIVE IMPLIED WATER RIGHT FOR FISH: DO OFF-RESERVATION INSTREAM WATER RIGHTS EXIST TO SUPPORT INDIAN TREATY FISHING RIGHTS? COMMENT FULL CITATION: Katheryn A. Bilodeau, The Elusive Implied Water
More information15 Alli 18 AlO :18 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR YAKIMA COUNTY
1 2 9 IO COUGAR DEN INC., a Yakama Nation corporation, FILED COUtHY CL.EHi\ 1 Alli 1 AlO :1 SUPERIOR CIUR. YAKIMA cs WI, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR YAKIMA COUNTY CaseNo.: 1-2-01- pages 12
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE; SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE; STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE; HOH TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S KLALLAM TRIBE; LOWER
More informationAs Approved and Recommended for Tribal Adoption at 3/1/12 Voigt Task Force Meeting REGARDING PREAMBLE
As Approved and Recommended for Tribal Adoption at 3/1/12 Voigt Task Force Meeting MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING TRIBAL - USDA-FOREST SERVICE RELATIONS ON NATIONAL FOREST LANDS WITHIN THE TERRITORIES
More informationGalanda Broadman, PLLC, Occasional Paper
Galanda Broadman, PLLC, Occasional Paper No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Personal Liability Exposure for Tribal Officials in the Wake of Maxwell v. County of San Diego By Scott Wheat and Amber Penn-Roco
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE; SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE; STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE; HOH TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S KLALLAM TRIBE; LOWER
More informationWhy Treaties Matter: Sovereignty and Existence
Why Treaties Matter: Sovereignty and Existence Terry L. Janis Indian Land Tenure Foundation Returning Indian Lands to Indian People Our Mission Land within the original boundaries of every reservation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-00011-BMM Document 175 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE, for itself and as parens patriea,
More informationCase 3:17-cv AA Document 28 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 14
Case 3:17-cv-00038-AA Document 28 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 14 Josh Newton, OSB# 983087 Brent Hall, OSB# 992762 jn@karnopp.com bhh@karnopp.com Jeffry S. Hinman, OSB# 096821 Karnopp Petersen LLP jsh@karnopp.com
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
NO. 03-107 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES, v. Petitioner, BILLY JO LARA, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR
More informationHoward Shale, Appellant' s Response to Brief of Amicus. Curiae
No. 44654-5 -II COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION II OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, vs. Howard Shale, Appellant. Jefferson County Superior Court Cause No. 12-1- 00194-0 The Honorable
More informationCase 3:05-cv JZ Document 12-1 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:05-cv-07272-JZ Document 12-1 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - TOLEDO OTTAWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA 13 S. 69 Miami,
More informationThe Palmer and Stevens Usual and Accustomed Places Treaties in the Opinions of the Courts
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln September 2008 The Palmer and Stevens Usual
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO CODER D'ALENE TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, Plaintiff/Respondent, Supreme Court No. 44478-2016 vs. KENNETH and DONNA JOHNSON, Defendants/ Appellants.
More informationIII. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES In 1856 the California Superintendent of Indian Affairs established a Reservation for the Tule River
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. CROW ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Case: 15-35679, 06/22/2016, ID: 10025228, DktEntry: 32, Page 1 of 23 No. 15-35679 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CROW ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v.
More informationNo In the Supreme Court of the United States. STATE OF WYOMING, Respondent.
No. 17-532 In the Supreme Court of the United States CLAYVIN B. HERRERA, v. Petitioner, STATE OF WYOMING, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Wyoming, Sheridan County BRIEF OF AMICI
More informationCase 1:08-cv EJL Document 12 Filed 04/06/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 1:08-cv-00396-EJL Document 12 Filed 04/06/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO STATE OF IDAHO by and through LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, Attorney General; and the IDAHO STATE TAX
More informationCase 2:17-sp RSM Document 33 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 14
Case :-sp-0000-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, vs.
More information