DEVELOPMENTS IN STATE TORT LAW AFFECTING THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP. By Edward T. Ellis and Robin D. Leone *
|
|
- Lynette Campbell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DEVELOPMENTS IN STATE TORT LAW AFFECTING THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP By Edward T. Ellis and Robin D. Leone * Although employment-at-will remains the fundamental concept behind the common law of employment in the United States, the common law torts of wrongful discharge, interference with contract, defamation, negligent misrepresentation, and negligent hiring and retention have weathered the at-will doctrine in most states. This paper reviews recent case law in the employment tort area and addresses trends in statutory development, including the increase in laws providing immunity to employers from claims previously allowed under the common law. This paper is not a tutorial on how the law came to be, but rather an overview of recent developments that demonstrates the broad spectrum of judicial and statutory treatment of these topics, from conservative states like New York, to more liberal jurisdictions like California. A list of sources appears in an appendix. I. AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT AND THE PUBLIC POLICY EXEMPTION A. Defining the Public Policy Exemption Under the doctrine of employment-at-will, the employer and employee are on equal footing, with both holding the right to discontinue the employment relationship at any time and for any reason. The result is that only employees covered by valid employment contracts are protected from an unexpected discharge, and those only to the extent of contract damages. One of the major exceptions to this doctrine is the public policy exemption. Followed to varying degrees in most states, the exemption enables discharged employees to pursue a cause of action for wrongful discharge in limited circumstances. Generally, the employee must show that the discharge implicates public policy on some level,
2 such as when an employer retaliates against an employee for performing a lawful act or for refusing to engage in unlawful conduct. See e.g., Shick v. Shirey, 716 A.2d 1231 (Pa. 1998) (retaliatory discharge for filing a worker s compensation claim). Courts have also found a public policy exception to the doctrine of employment-at-will when an employer discriminates against a particular employee because of race, gender, or disability. City of Moorpark v. Superior Court, 959 P.2d 752 (Cal. 1998) (disability discrimination); Phillips v. St. Mary Reg l Med. Ctr., 116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 770 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) (racial and sexual discrimination). Finding a public policy implication or defining public policy at all is challenging for every state, no matter how expansively the courts elect to interpret the exemption. For example, California, which has perhaps the most evolved framework of exceptions to the at-will doctrine, employs a four-part test that requires showing that the public policy: 1. Has its basis in a constitutional or statutory provision; 2. Affects the public at large, not just the employer s or employee s personal interests; 3. Has been articulated at the time of the employee s discharge; and 4. Is fundamental and substantial. White v. Ultramar, Inc., 73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 262, 266 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998). B. The Exemption in Practice 1. Limiting Recognition of Public Policy Claims The state-by-state variation is immense, with some states limiting use of the public policy exception to fact-specific situations. New York, for example, simply does not recognize the common law claim of wrongful discharge. Lobosco v. New York Tel. Co., 751 N.E.2d 462 (N.Y. 2001). In Lobosco, the court found that the state s whistleblower law did not apply to the facts of the case, which involved an employee who refused to testify untruthfully on behalf of his employer and who
3 blew the whistle on a fellow employee s wrongful acts. The New York Court of Appeals also recently elected not to broaden an extremely narrow exception to the employment-at-will doctrine relevant only to associate attorneys working for a law firm. The only exceptions to the employment-at-will rule ever adopted by this Court have involved very specific substitutes for a written employment contract. Horn v. New York Times, 2003 WL (N.Y. Feb. 25, 2003) In Horn, the court concluded that a physician working in a corporate setting could not be analogized to an associate attorney working in a law firm for two reasons: 1) service to clients is the only reason an associate is employed at a law firm; providing medical services was a part of Dr. Horn s corporate management job, rather than the central purpose of her employment at the company, and 2) the associate and the employer law firm share a common professional enterprise and have a mutual obligation to uphold the same ethical standards; Dr. Horn provided medical services to Times employees, while the company itself was in the business of publishing newspapers. Even in Horn s predecessor case, the court did not recognize a tort of abusive discharge, but instead found an obligation implied in the professional ethics laws. Wieder v. Scala, 609 N.E.2d 105 (1992). Compare Bohatch v. Butler & Binion, 977 S.W.2d 543 (Tex. 1998) (finding no cause of action for one partner in a law firm against the partners who expelled her for reporting suspected over-billing by another partner). Texas joins New York at the conservative end of the spectrum, recognizing only the so-called Sabine Pilot exemption. Nearly 20 years ago, Sabine Pilot established the precedent that an at-will employee can bring suit for wrongful discharge if the only reason for termination is refusal to perform an illegal act that could result in criminal penalties. Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tex.1985). The Texas Supreme Court has declined to add any further exceptions to the doctrine, including refusing to expand coverage to private employees discharged for reporting
4 illegal activities. Austin v. HealthTrust, Inc., 967 S.W.2d 400, 403 (Tex.1998). See also Guient v. Hogan & Assoc., No CV, 2001 WL (Tex. App. June 28, 2001) (unpublished opinion) (declining to recognize a common law cause of action for constructive discharge based on sexual harassment or retaliation). Texas also has followed New York s lead in refusing to imply a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the employment relationship. City of Midland v. O'Bryant, 18 S.W.3d 209, 216 (Tex. 2000); Simmons Airlines v. Lagrotte, 50 S.W.3d 748 (Tex. App. 2001). 2. Expanding Application of the Public Policy Exemption California is on the opposite end of the spectrum and continues to test the outer limits of the public policy exception. California recently addressed the issue of protecting regulated professionals, such as physicians, and has responded in a typically expansive manner. In evaluating the case of a physician terminated for advocating medically appropriate health care, the California Supreme Court readily identified a violation of public policy. Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Med. Group and Del Pero, 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 627 (2000). Also in recent years, California courts have ruled that federal law can establish state public policy and that administrative regulations are sufficient to demonstrate a public policy commitment. Green v. Ralee Eng g Co., 960 P.2d 1046 (Cal. 1998). In Green, the court implicated the Federal Aviation Act, embodied in a series of administrative regulations, as the source for both a federal and state public policy of commitment to air safety. [I]f a statute that seeks to further a public policy objective delegates the authority to adopt administrative regulations to an administrative agency... and that agency adopts regulations that... effectuate the statutory policy, then those regulations may be manifestations of important public policy. Green, 960 P.2d at Green goes beyond the statutory requirements of California s whistleblower protection statute by eliminating the requirement to report any alleged wrongdoing of an
5 employer or fellow employees to an outside regulator, rather than through internal channels. 3. Moderating Use of the Public Policy Exception Some states that allow wrongful discharge actions in certain situations e.g., Pennsylvania continue to characterize the exception to employment-at-will as a narrow one. As a result, even if the state of the law is more like California s in practice, the courts describe the exemption as if adhering to New York s more stringent scheme. For example, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania found an exemption on public policy grounds in a case involving a supervisory employee terminated for refusing to engage in conduct prohibited by public policy. Rothrock v. Rothrock Motor Sales, Inc., 810 A.2d 114 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002). Such an exemption would be a harder sell in a court in Texas or New York. Like Pennsylvania, Illinois limits application of the exception to instances where an employee has been terminated for filing a worker s compensation claim or for whistleblowing. Jacobson v. Knepper & Moga, P.C., 706 N.E.2d 491 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). However, Illinois courts have made room for other exceptions, such as in public safety cases. Sherman v. Kraft General Foods, Inc.,651 N.E.2d 708 (Il.App.Ct.1995).To prove a claim in Illinois, the employee has to show his/her termination was in retaliation for performing a protected activity, such as filing a worker s compensation claim or reporting illegal activity to a regulatory agency. McGrath v. CCC Information Servs., Inc., 731 N.E.2d 384 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). In McGrath, the plaintiff could not show that a dispute over stock options and the amount of an employee bonus were matters of public policy. The court held instead that plaintiff's claim is more in the nature of a private and individual grievance insufficient to justify a claim of wrongful discharge. Id. at 391. Every state, including California, disavows adherence to the public policy exemption in a number of circumstances, such as in cases requiring balancing between constitutional rights and public
FEDERAL AVIATION ACT WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM 49 USC 42121
FEDERAL AVIATION ACT WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM 49 USC 42121 Jennifer A. Coyne United Air Lines, Inc. Whistleblower. An employee who refuses to engage in and/or reports illegal or wrongful activities
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 01 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel John Lee Miller and JOHN LEE MILLER,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 10-0582 444444444444 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS, PETITIONER, v. LARRY M. GENTILELLO, M.D., RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationNational Conference of State Legislatures Legislation on Whistleblower Protections. As of February 14, 2011
National Conference of State Legislatures 2011 Legislation on Whistleblower Protections As of February 14, 2011 ARIZONA AZ H 2629 Patterson (D) False Claims Summary: Relates to false claims against the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 09-0100 444444444444 TRAVIS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, PETITIONER, v. DIANE LEE NORMAN, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON
More informationShawn Oller. Focus Areas. Overview
Office Managing Shareholder Camelback Esplanade 2425 East Camelback Road, Suite 900 85016 main: (602) 474-3600 direct: (602) 474-3608 fax: (602) 957-1801 soller@littler.com 201 Third Street NW Suite 500
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2015 New Jersey
Accountability Report Card Summary 2015 New Jersey New Jersey has an uneven state whistleblower law: Scoring 63 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 14 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 10-0426 444444444444 SAFESHRED, INC., PETITIONER, v. LOUIS MARTINEZ, III, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER POLICY
AUTHORIZATION: Board of Governors Page 1 of 7 1.0 Purpose North York General Hospital (NYGH) promotes and supports a culture of transparency, accountability, safety and ethical standards. Accordingly,
More informationC. Robert Heath S. MoPac Expressway, Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746
C. Robert Heath PA RT N E R A U S T I N O F F I C E 3711 S. MoPac Expressway, Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746 Fax: 512-320-5638 Attorney Overview Complex Governmental Litigation and Counseling
More informationJUDGE EPSTEIN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Presiding Justice Fitzgerald Smith and Justice Howse concurred in the judgement and
FIFTH DIVISION March 18, 2011 No. SCOTT RABIN, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, KARLIN AND FLEISHER, LLC; RICHARD FLEISHER; and RONALD FLEISHER; Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County
More informationWHISTLE BLOWING POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 2. PURPOSE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCertiorari Denied, No. 29,314, July 21, Released for Publication August 2, Corrections August 2, COUNSEL
VIGIL V. STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE, 2005-NMCA-096, 138 N.M. 63, 116 P.3d 854 ROBERT E. VIGIL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and DOMINGO P. MARTINEZ, STATE AUDITOR,
More informationA RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR SPERINO S RETALIATION AND THE UNREASONABLE JUDGE. Alex B. Long * INTRODUCTION
A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR SPERINO S RETALIATION AND THE UNREASONABLE JUDGE Alex B. Long * INTRODUCTION I m about to relate a story, and I promise it s true. I recently met with an employee who had a problem
More informationTHE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT STATUTE
THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT STATUTE Gordon K. Wright Cooper & Scully, P.C. Gordon.wright@cooperscully.com 2017 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal issues. It is not intended
More informationPRIVATE SECTOR WHISTLEBLOWER AND WHISTLEBLOWING PROTECTION
CAMARA COMERCIO E INDUSTRIA TIMOR- LESTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY TIMOR LESTE (CCI-TL) PRIVATE SECTOR WHISTLEBLOWER AND WHISTLEBLOWING PROTECTION Shared by: ALBERTO CARVALHO ARAUJO, Vice President
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER POLICY
WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY 1 Policy Statement: Organization is committed to creating a culture of Right Doing that encourages high standards of ethics, integrity and objectivity in individual conduct. 2 Overview
More informationEthical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel
Ethical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel 2017 ACC Fall Symposium October 6, 2017 Today s Presenter(s): Lynn W. Hartman Member Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman, PLC Phone: 319-896-4083 Email: lhartman@spmblaw.com
More informationDAN S STIMULUS PLAN: CASE LAW UPDATE
DAN S STIMULUS PLAN: CASE LAW UPDATE Presented and Prepared by: Daniel R. Simmons dsimmons@heylroyster.com Springfield, Illinois 217.522.8822 The cases and materials presented here are in summary and outline
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 5, 2014 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 5, 2014 Session CHARLES HAYNES v. FORMAC STABLES, INC. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Western Section Circuit Court for Obion County
More informationWin One, Lose One: A New Defense for California
Win One, Lose One: A New Defense for California 9/15/2001 Employment + Labor and Litigation Client Alert This Commentary highlights two recent developments in California employment law: (1) the recent
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2018 Louisiana
Accountability Report Card Summary 2018 Louisiana Louisiana has a below average state whistleblower law: Scoring 45 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 45 th out of 51 (50 states and the District
More informationDOLPHIN OFFSHORE ENTERPRISES (INDIA) LIMITED WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
DOLPHIN OFFSHORE ENTERPRISES (INDIA) LIMITED Introduction WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY The Company believes in honesty, integrity, fairness and transparency in all its practices, policies and procedures, including
More informationDefending Audit-Malpractice Cases: The Audit-Interference Rule By James H. Bicks and Robert S. Hoff March 26, 2012
ARTICLES Defending Audit-Malpractice Cases: The Audit-Interference Rule By James H. Bicks and Robert S. Hoff March 26, 2012 Getting a routine financial-statement audit is not the equivalent of buying an
More informationCase 1:14-cv MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:14-cv-00215-MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TINA DEETER, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 14-215E
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2018 South Carolina
Accountability Report Card Summary 2018 South Carolina South Carolina has a below average state whistleblower law: Scoring 55 out of a possible 100; Ranking 33 rd out of 51 (50 states and the District
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 North Carolina
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 North Carolina North Carolina has an average state whistleblower law: Scoring 61 out of a possible 100 points, but its scope is varied; Ranking 17 th out of 51 (50
More informationJames Ciferni v. Day & Zimmerman Inc
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-27-2013 James Ciferni v. Day & Zimmerman Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-2647
More informationVIGIL MECHANISM/ WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY ASHOKA VINIYOGA LIMITED
VIGIL MECHANISM/ WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY OF ASHOKA VINIYOGA LIMITED VIGIL MECHANISM/ WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY 1. PREFACE Pursuant to provisions of Section 177 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Clause 49 of the
More informationPage 2 of 5 Forensic investigation of building failures and damages due to materials, design, construction defects, contract issues, maintenance and w
Page 1 of 5 Volume 19 Issue 4 In this Issue From The Chair Architectural Copyright Basics Every Lawyer Should Know Model Home, Jobsite and Communication Compliance Under the Americans with Disabilities
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2018 Nevada
Accountability Report Card Summary 2018 Nevada Nevada has a protective state whistleblower law: Scoring 75 out of a possible 100 points. Ranking 3 rd out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationChapter Three. Bidding. Patrick M. Miller and Molly Moss
Chapter Three Bidding Patrick M. Miller and Molly Moss 3.01 Introduction...24 3.02 Mutual Mistake...24 3.03 Unilateral Mistake before Award of Contract...27 3.04 Unilateral Mistake after Award of Contract...28
More informationCircuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 24-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2016
Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 24-C-13-005664 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1717 September Term, 2016 BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE v. MARCELLUS JACKSON Leahy,
More informationETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL
ETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL GUEST SPEAKERS SARAH MENENDEZ Senior Litigation Counsel T +1.713.918.1039 sarah_menendez@bmc.com SEAN GORMAN Trial Partner T +1.713.221.1221 sean.gorman@bracewell.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. 12 C 1856 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Fish v. Hennessy et al Doc. 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM A. FISH, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH J. HENNESSY, No. 12 C 1856 Magistrate Judge Mary M. Rowland
More informationWhistle Blower Policy
Whistle Blower Policy (Revision No. 1 Dt. 01.02.2016) National Engineering Industries Limited. Khatipura Road, Jaipur 302006 Tel: 0141-2223221, Fax: 0141-2221926 Visit us at: www.nbcbearings.com 1 The
More informationLaura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell
Laura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell (612) 604 6685 lpfeiffer@winthrop.com RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE TITLE VII
More informationBoard of Governors. May 17, Agenda Item 97 Special Committee on Collaborative Law
Board of Governors May 17, 2013 Agenda Item 97 Special Committee on Collaborative Law MEMORANDUM To: From: Special Committee on Collaborative Law CJN Date: February 26, 2013 Re: Separation of Powers and
More informationCORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS
CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS CHAPTER 15 CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS 15-1 Corporations and Associations... 299 CHAPTER 15 CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS 1. Corporations and Associations Whether corporations
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2018 Washington
Accountability Report Card Summary 2018 Washington Washington has an uneven state whistleblower law: Scoring 64 out of a possible 100; Ranking 15 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationEthics Opinion No. 94-1
Ethics Opinion No. 94-1 Attorney Communication with the Managing Board of a Government Agency, Regarding Pending Litigation, Without the Consent of Counsel Representing the Agency. The Committee has been
More informationMeredith, Arthur, Beachley,
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2640 September Term, 2015 YVETTE PHILLIPS v. STATE OF MARYLAND, et al. Meredith, Arthur, Beachley, JJ. Opinion by Arthur, J. Filed: February 15,
More informationDon't Overlook Pleading Challenges In State Pharma Suits
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Don't Overlook Pleading Challenges In State
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION DEANDRE JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION DEANDRE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, Defendant. Case No. 4:18-00015-CV-RK ORDER GRANTING
More informationDamian Cioni v. Globe Specialty Metals Inc
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-23-2015 Damian Cioni v. Globe Specialty Metals Inc Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationMELISSA M. MERLIN. St. Louis, MO office:
MELISSA M. MERLIN Partner St. Louis, MO office: 314.480.1887 email: melissa.merlin@ Overview Melissa focuses on product liability, commercial, and employment litigation. She works closely with product
More information:Docket No. :Civil Action. illegal activity as a conscientious employee. Plaintiff, with more particularity, says: TILE PARTIES
John P. Brennan, Jr. Attorney at Law Avon Professional Building 43 Main Street, Suite 1B Avon-by-the-Sea, New Jersey 07717 Attorney for plaintiff, Thomas E. Pancoast THOMAS E. PANCOAST Plaintiff SOUTHERN
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. CELIA D. MISKEVITCH, Appellant V. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 25, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00099-CV CELIA D. MISKEVITCH, Appellant V. 7-ELEVEN, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 298th
More informationVERMONT SUPERIOR COURT
Prouty et. al. v. Southwestern Vermont Med. Ctr., Inc., No. 89-2-13 Bncv (Wesley, J., Oct.. 26, 2013). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NICHOLAS ZILLGES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 13-C-1287 KENNEY BANK & TRUST, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER Nicholas Zillges has filed this
More informationTwenty-Seventh Annual Labor & Employment Law Institute. Labor & Employment Law Section of the State Bar of Texas. August 19-20, 2016.
Twenty-Seventh Annual Labor & Employment Law Institute Labor & Employment Law Section of the State Bar of Texas August 19-20, 2016 State Law Update Richard R. Carlson Professor of Law Houston College of
More informationSTATE OF TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Greg C. Wilkins Christopher A. McKinney Orgain Bell & Tucker, LLP 470 Orleans Street P.O. Box 1751 Beaumont, TX 77704 Tel: (409) 838 6412 Email: gcw@obt.com
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 JUDGE SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 JUDGE SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 Lois J. Dawson, Esquire Brian T. McNelis, Esquire 1525 Delaware Avenue
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO RWZ. NANCY K. GARRITY, JOANNE CLARK and ARTHUR GARRITY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-12143-RWZ NANCY K. GARRITY, JOANNE CLARK and ARTHUR GARRITY v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
More information2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
Page 1 Court of Appeal, First District, California. Mary FITZSIMONS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, Defendant and Respondent. No. A131604. May 16, 2012. Background:
More informationCrafting the Winning Argument in Spoliation Cases: And the Dog Ate Our Documents Isn t It
Crafting the Winning Argument in Spoliation Cases: And the Dog Ate Our Documents Isn t It Janelle L. Davis Thompson & Knight LLP 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-1677 Janelle.Davis@tklaw.com
More informationCharles M. Roesch Partner
Charles M. Roesch Partner chuck.roesch@dinsmore.com Cincinnati, OH Tel: (513) 977-8178 Chuck is the chair of the Labor and Employment department and a member of the firm s Board of Directors. He also sits
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE WAYNE H. KASSOTIS TOWN OF FITZWILLIAM. Argued: April 16, 2014 Opinion Issued: August 28, 2014
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationABA Fall 2016 National Legal Malpractice Conference
ABA Fall 2016 National Legal Malpractice Conference POINTING FINGERS AND SHARING THE PAIN: CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE, COMPARATIVE FAULT AND APPORTIONMENT IN LEGAL MALPRACTICE ACTIONS ABA National Legal Malpractice
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Washington
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Washington Washington has an uneven state whistleblower law: Scoring 62 out of a possible 100; Ranking 15 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two November 22, 2016 MICHAEL NOEL, and DIANA NOEL, individually and as the marital community
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM F CURTIS H. STOUT, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM F214059 CARLOS HONEYSUCKLE, DECEASED, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT CURTIS H. STOUT, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 VALLEY VORGE INSURANCE CO., INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 1, 2011 Session at Knoxville
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 1, 2011 Session at Knoxville MICHAEL LIND v. BEAMAN DODGE, INC., d/b/a BEAMAN DODGE CHRYSLER JEEP ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0818 444444444444 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. STEWART, COX, AND HATCHER, P.C. AND TURNER & ASSOCIATES, P.A., RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationCAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE. NOW COMES Plaintiff, Stephen Torres, and files this, his Original Petition
CAUSE NO. Filed 12 August 17 A7:46 Donna Kay McKinney District Clerk Bexar District Accepted by: Monica Hernandez STEPHEN TORRES, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO and CHRISTOPHER CASALS, Defendants. IN
More informationAdopted: August 1996 Wheaton ISD #803 Policy 401
Adopted: August 1996 Wheaton ISD #803 Policy 401 Revised: August 2000, November 2018 401 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to provide equal employment opportunity for
More informationCase 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:16-cv-04083-DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARKET SYNERGY GROUP, INC, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
More informationSTATE OF DELAWARE TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF DELAWARE TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Prepared by James W. Semple Cooch and Taylor The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street, Tenth Floor Wilmington DE, 19899 Tel: (302)984-3842 Email: jsemple@coochtaylor.com
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 13, 2015 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 13, 2015 Session DANIEL RICHMOND V. VANGUARD HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 2013-CV-12702
More information[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : :
[J-58-2017] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SCF CONSULTING, LLC, Appellant v. BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE, Appellee No. 7 EAP 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of the Superior Court entered
More informationOrder ( JOHN BEASLEY)
Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Georgia Business Court Opinions 12-11-2006 Order ( JOHN BEASLEY) Alice D. Bonner Superior Court of Fulton County Follow this and additional works at:
More informationILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Brame v. City of North Chicago, 2011 IL App (2d) 100760 Appellate Court Caption CURTIS W. BRAME, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NORTH CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee
More informationAviation and Space Law
August, 2003 No. 1 Aviation and Space Law In This Issue John H. Martin is a partner and head of the Trial Department at Thompson & Knight LLP. Mr. Martin gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Thompson
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-13-00287-CV CITY OF FRITCH, APPELLANT V. KIRK COKER, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 84th District Court Hutchinson County, Texas Trial
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY. Honorable Michael J. Cordonnier, Judge
SHANTI S. YERRA, M.D., ) ) Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD34448 and SD34545 ) Consolidated MERCY CLINIC ) SPRINGFIELD COMMUNITIES, f/k/a ) ST. JOHNS HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., ) FILED: November 01, 2017 ) Appellant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GREGORY HOOKER and wife ANN MARIE HOOKER, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 3-03-CV-2222-R COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN, INC., WASHINGTON
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE I. AGE DISCRIMINATION By Edward T. Ellis 1 A. Disparate Impact Claims Under the ADEA After Smith v. City of Jackson 1. The Supreme
More information1. Filing Procedure Other Than Original Lawsuit. a. Judgments Registered
1. Filing Procedure Other Than Original Lawsuit a. Judgments Registered Royal Extrusions Ltd. v. Continental Window and Glass Corp., 812 N.E.2d 554, 349 Ill.App.3d 642 (2004): Canadian company obtained
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC ON REVIEW FROM THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT J. CROUCH, vs. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC 05 2140 THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON REVIEW FROM THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL PETITIONER=S
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00536-CR NO. 03-14-00537-CR Gerald Stevens, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NOS.
More informationNUMBER CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXAS STATE BOARD OF NURSING, BERNARDINO PEDRAZA JR.,
NUMBER 13-11-00068-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG TEXAS STATE BOARD OF NURSING, Appellants, v. BERNARDINO PEDRAZA JR., Appellee. On appeal from the 93rd District
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE ex rel. CHURCH & DWIGHT ) Opinion issued April 3, 2018 CO., INC., ) Relator, ) v. ) No. SC95976 ) The Honorable WILLIAM B. COLLINS, ) Respondent. ) ) and ) ) STATE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 16, 2017 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 16, 2017 Session 10/19/2017 TRAY SIMMONS v. JOHN CHEADLE, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 15C4276 Mitchell Keith
More informationB.C. V. STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.: SHAKING UP TEXAS S INTERPRETATION OF THE TCHRA
B.C. V. STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.: SHAKING UP TEXAS S INTERPRETATION OF THE TCHRA I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. BACKGROUND... 2 A. The Texas Commission on Human Rights Act... 2 B. Common Law Claims Under
More information1998 WL Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois.
1998 WL 748328 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois. Rosalind WARNELL and Suzette Wright, each individually and on behalf of other similarly situated
More information2013 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
2013 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Patrick J. Sweeney Sweeney & Sheehan, P.C. 1515 Market Street Suite 1900 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Tel: (215) 563-9811 Email: patrick.sweeney@sweeneyfirm.com
More informationNANCY A. NOALL. Contact Information Nancy A. Noall
NANCY A. NOALL NANCY A. NOALL is a Partner with the Ohio based law firm of Weston Hurd LLP and is the Chair of the firm s Labor Practice Group. She concentrates her practice in the areas of labor and employment
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. SHERYL JOHNSON-TODD, Appellant V. JOHN S. MORGAN, Appellee NO CV COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, NINTH DISTRICT, BEAUMONT
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT SHERYL JOHNSON-TODD, Appellant V. JOHN S. MORGAN, Appellee NO. 09-15-00210-CV COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, NINTH DISTRICT, BEAUMONT 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 11078 October 29, 2015, Opinion
More informationCase 1:13-cv JOF Document 14 Filed 11/12/13 Page 1 of 8
Case 113-cv-02607-JOF Document 14 Filed 11/12/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Jeffrey Pruett, Plaintiff, v. BlueLinx Holdings, Inc.,
More informationPROCEDURE ETH-151P-01 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION
PROCEDURE ETH-151P-01 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION Authorized by the following policies: ETH-151 Equal Opportunity ETH-152 Reasonable Accommodations for Qualified Applicants
More informationNovember The Shirt Off My Back: Using the Relationship Between a Product and a Service to Your Advantage
I suggest the following simple ten ways to avoid malpractice in litigation: q PRODUCT LIABILITY November 2012 IN THIS ISSUE In this newsletter the authors compare two cases in which courts reach different
More information2016 Year in Review False Claims Act
2016 Year in Review False Claims Act January 25, 2017 Jeremy Kernodle, Haynes and Boone, LLP haynesboone.com Sean McKenna, Greenberg Traurig, LLP www.gtlaw.com The Lincoln Law (March 2, 1863) Then: unscrupulous
More informationKOHL V. CITY OF PHOENIX: CLARIFYING THE SCOPE OF ABSOLUTE MUNICIPAL IMMUNITY
KOHL V. CITY OF PHOENIX: CLARIFYING THE SCOPE OF ABSOLUTE MUNICIPAL IMMUNITY Meredith K. Marder INTRODUCTION In Kohl v. City of Phoenix, the Arizona Supreme Court considered the extent of municipal immunity
More informationPrompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege
Prompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege by Monica L. Goebel and John B. Nickerson Workplace Harassment In order to avoid liability for workplace harassment, an employer must show that it exercised
More informationCase 5:16-cv RSWL-KK Document 11 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:95
Case :-cv-00-rswl-kk Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Kathryn Clenney, SBN Barona Band of Mission Indians 0 Barona Road Lakeside, CA 00 Tel.: - FAX: -- kclenney@barona-nsn.gov Attorneys for specially-appearing
More informationCase: , 01/02/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 43-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-55470, 01/02/2018, ID: 10708808, DktEntry: 43-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JAN 02 2018 (1 of 14) MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT
More informationPresent: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Millette, JJ., and Russell, S.J.
Present: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Millette, JJ., and Russell, S.J. JAMES GREGORY LOGAN OPINION BY SENIOR JUSTICE CHARLES S. RUSSELL v. Record No. 090706 January 15, 2010 COMMONWEALTH
More informationCase 6:15-cv WSS Document 25 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:15-cv-00231-WSS Document 25 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION ALBERT J. TURK, M.D. and SHELLEY TURK, R.N., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationFORMAL OPINION Communications with a Represented Party by a Lawyer Acting Pro Se or by a Lawyer Who is Represented by Counsel
FORMAL OPINION 2017-200 Communications with a Represented Party by a Lawyer Acting Pro Se or by a Lawyer Who is Represented by Counsel A. Introduction Lawyers represent clients, but they may also be clients
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT LINDA STURM, : : Plaintiff, : CASE NO. 3:03CV666 (AWT) v. : : ROCKY HILL BOARD OF EDUCATION, : : Defendant. : RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS The plaintiff,
More information