Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
|
|
- Victoria Maxwell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARKET SYNERGY GROUP, INC, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:16-cv JOINT MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS ANSWER, ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF S PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION, AND FILING OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1, Market Synergy Group, Inc. ( Plaintiff and the United States Department of Labor, Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and Phyllis C. Borzi, Assistant Secretary of the United States Department of Labor (collectively, the Department, bring this joint motion for a scheduling order in this case. Although this case will proceed on the basis of an administrative record and is therefore exempt from a mandatory scheduling order under Local Rule 16.1(b, the parties agree that addressing the items included here would serve the Court s and the parties interests. BACKGROUND In April 2016, the Department issued its final rule revising its interpretation of fiduciary investment advice for purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ( ERISA, 29 U.S.C et seq., and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ( the Code, 26 U.S.C. 1 et seq. See 81 Fed. Reg (Apr. 8, In connection with the rule, the Department, among other things, granted a new Best Interest
2 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 11 Contract ( BIC Exemption and amended Prohibited Transaction Exemption ( PTE 84-24, both of which permit fiduciaries, contingent upon meeting certain requirements, to engage in transactions involving ERISA plans or individuals retirement accounts ( IRAs that would otherwise be prohibited under ERISA and the Code. The rule and amendment to PTE 84-24, which become applicable on April 10, 2017, will require fiduciaries providing investment advice concerning fixed indexed annuities to rely on the BIC Exemption, if they wish to engage in certain prohibited transactions, rather than PTE Plaintiff filed suit on June 8, 2016, challenging the amendment of PTE under the Administrative Procedure Act ( APA. On June 17, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion to preliminarily enjoin the Department from implementing the amendment to and partial revocation of PTE such that PTE as it existed prior to the amendment and partial revocation will remain in effect during the litigation s pendency. In addition to this action, four other actions have been filed challenging aspects of the same rule and exemptions. See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. Perez, No. 3:16-cv M (N.D. Tex. June 1, 2016; Nat l Ass n for Fixed Annuities v. Perez, No. 1:16-cv RDM (D.D.C. June 2, 2016; American Council of Life Insurers v. U.S. Dep t of Labor, No. 3:16-cv C (N.D. Tex. June 8, 2016; and Indexed Annuity Leadership Council v. Perez, No. 3:16-cv-1537-N (N.D. Tex. June 8, A motion for preliminary injunction was also filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and a schedule was set for the Department to respond to that motion, and file a cross-motion for summary judgment, on July 8, 2016, with oral argument on those motions set for August 25, See Minute Order, Nat l Ass n for Fixed Annuities v. Perez, No. 1:16-cv RDM (D.D.C. June 6, The three cases in the Northern District of Texas have been consolidated and the parties have proposed to that court to proceed directly to summary judgment briefing. See Order, Chamber of 2
3 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 3 of 11 Commerce v. Perez, No. 3:16-cv M (N.D. Tex. June 21, 2016, ECF No. 43; Joint Mot. for Scheduling Order, Chamber of Commerce v. Perez, No. 3:16-cv-1476-M (N.D. Tex. June 24, 2016, ECF No. 44. DISCUSSION The parties have agreed that oral argument should be held on the motion for preliminary injunction, that the Department s time to answer should be extended, and that an index to the administrative record should be filed. The parties have not reached agreement on the timing of oral argument, but present the issues for the Court s consideration. 1. Oral Argument on the Preliminary Injunction Motion The parties agree that oral argument is warranted on Plaintiff s motion for preliminary injunction. The parties have not reached agreement on proposed dates for that argument. Due to pre-existing travel plans, counsel for the parties are collectively unavailable from August 25 to September 13, a. Plaintiff s Position As explained more fully at pages 39 through 41 of Plaintiff s memorandum of law in support of its motion for preliminary injunction, and as supported by the record cited therein, time is of the essence. Each passing week without the interim relief requested brings the numerous, significant harms articulated in Plaintiff s memorandum closer to actualization. Even with an April 2017 applicability date of amended PTE 84-24, Plaintiff, independent marketing organizations, and independent insurance agents are all at imminent risk of being left behind by their product suppliers, who are now formulating business strategies and policies for dealing with the Department s actions. 3
4 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 4 of 11 Among other things, the Department states below that the [g]rant of an injunction would not, with certainty, stay the applicability date because a merits decision is likely before that point, and an ultimate decision upholding the rule in this action would nullify any [preliminary] injunction staying the applicability date. Plaintiff does not agree with this statement. First, Plaintiff s preliminary injunction request is focused on a specific aspect, and a specific deleterious effect, of the Department s amendment and partial revocation of PTE As explained in Plaintiff s memorandum of law in support of its motion for preliminary injunction, Plaintiff and many others in the fixed indexed annuity industry currently face an existential threat to their businesses and careers. These affected parties are not in a position to know whether a merits decision in this action is likely before the approaching applicability date of the Department s new rules, particularly given the likelihood of an appeal regardless of which party prevails in this Court. Moreover, without preliminary injunctive relief, Plaintiff and others similarly affected will be forced, now, to make very costly business and financial decisions as a result of what Plaintiff believes will be proven to be unlawful and unjustified action by the Department. Second, even under the Department s hypothetical scenario where this action results in an ultimate decision upholding the rule, such a decision will not necessarily nullify any [preliminary] injunction staying the applicability date of the amendment and partial revocation of PTE as it relates to fixed indexed annuity sellers. Plaintiff s motion for preliminary injunction accounts for this possibility, while explaining why temporary relief from the current applicability date of the Department s new rules may still be necessary and equitable even if the Court ultimately upholds the Department s amendment and partial revocation of PTE On page 43 of its memorandum of law in support of its motion for preliminary injunction, Plaintiff 4
5 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 5 of 11 states that in the event the Department prevails on the merits, Plaintiff would conditionally request that the Court order the Department to set a new applicability date that provides Plaintiff, its independent marketing organization members, independent insurance agents, and the rest of the fixed indexed annuity industry a reasonable and adequate period of time after the disposition of the case to come into compliance with the Department s new rules and related exemptions. Thus, Plaintiff respectfully disagrees with the Department s nullification argument. Moreover, the Department states that plaintiff waited more than two months after the rule and related exemptions and amendments were published to file its preliminary injunction motion. Again, the Department fails to appreciate the unique and dynamic situation that Plaintiff and the rest of the fixed indexed annuity industry (including the tens of thousands of independent life insurance agents whose livelihoods are at stake face in connection with the Department s totally unexpected about-face regarding the treatment of fixed indexed annuities in the final version of the amendment and partial revocation of PTE In addition to going through the necessary process of analyzing the Department s massive final rulemaking package in relation to the proposed package, evaluating the prospects for a legislative fix, retaining counsel, and otherwise preparing to initiate litigation, Plaintiff and its independent marketing organization members needed to allow some time to determine what the insurance companies and others with which they do business, after digesting the final rulemaking package themselves, intend to do (or were at least considering doing in response to the Department s action. The parties have proposed that Plaintiff s reply in support of its motion for preliminary injunction be due on August 5, Plaintiff, however, will commit to filing its reply on or before August 1. Accordingly, Plaintiff requests oral argument on any date convenient to the Court between August 2 and August 23. 5
6 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 6 of 11 Plaintiff further proposes that the Court allot a total of four hours to hear the argument. Although plaintiff does not intend to call any witnesses at the hearing, it intends to seek to make available for examination by the Court the following persons: Sheryl Moore, Lance Sparks, and Donald Wales. Each of these persons submitted declarations in support of Plaintiff s motion for preliminary injunction. b. Defendants Position Defendants propose that the argument be scheduled for September 19, 2016 or at the Court s convenience thereafter, as counsel for Defendants have significant deadlines requiring considerable preparation in other cases challenging the rule and exemptions at issue here on August 5, 10, 19, and 25, and counsel for both parties will be unavailable from August 25 through September 13. Counsel for Defendants are unavailable from August 29 to September 13 due to a combination of work and vacation travel, including an international trip, and understand that counsel for Plaintiff will also be unavailable during the majority of that period. Although counsel for Plaintiff has requested a hearing date in August, any date prior to September 19 would be unduly burdensome for Defendants. Dates prior to or including August 19 are not feasible because on August 5, counsel for the Department must submit a brief in reply to a motion for preliminary injunction in a case challenging both the rule and related exemptions in National Association for Fixed Annuities (D.D.C.; on August 10, counsel for the Department must file a joint appendix of the relevant portions of the administrative record and a brief with conforming citations in the same case; and on August 19, counsel for the Department must submit a brief in response to three separate summary judgment motions in Chamber of Commerce (N.D. Tex., consolidated also challenging both the Rule and related exemptions. Those cases raise many more issues than are presented by the instant action, including numerous 6
7 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 7 of 11 claims under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA, the Federal Arbitration Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Fifth and First Amendments of the United States Constitution. Accordingly, an argument scheduled any time between August 2 and August 23 would be unduly burdensome to Defendants because travel and preparation for the argument would interfere with Defendants preparation for and adherence to previously scheduled courtordered deadlines for the Department s briefs and an oral argument in other courts. Furthermore, setting the hearing for mid-september will not prejudice plaintiff. Importantly, the challenged rule will not become applicable for another eight months. See 81 Fed. Reg Accordingly, grant of a preliminary injunction, staying a rule that has no direct effect until the April 2017 applicability date, would do nothing in the present except to inform Plaintiff s estimation of the likelihood that PTE will ultimately be upheld or vacated. Grant of an injunction would not, with certainty, stay the applicability date because a merits decision is likely before that point, and an ultimate decision upholding the rule in this action would nullify any injunction staying the applicability date. Moreover, as evidence that time is not of the essence, plaintiff waited more than two months after the rule and related exemptions and amendments were published to file its preliminary injunction motion. A preliminary injunction would not relieve Plaintiff of an existing obligations under the regulation, nor would it guarantee that the regulation will not go into effect in April Plaintiff s hope that a preliminary injunction in this case would influence the actions of third party insurance producers in a way beneficial to Plaintiff is entirely speculative and insufficient for preliminary injunctive relief, especially in light of the multiple pending cases those third parties could take into account. Under these unique circumstances, a hearing date of September 19, 2016 would not prejudice Plaintiff. 7
8 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 8 of 11 Finally, Plaintiff argues that it would benefit even if a preliminary injunction was vacated by a merits decision prior to April 2017 because, in that event, it has asked the Court to further delay the applicability of the Conflict of Interest Rule. That argument fails to support Plaintiff s schedule proposal because it is both unfounded and irrelevant. For reasons that will be addressed in later briefing, a court that upholds an agency s action in toto has no authority to award further relief to the plaintiff. If the Department prevails on the merits, then Plaintiff has no claim, equitable or otherwise, on which the Court could grant the requested relief. This relief is not sought in Plaintiff s complaint, and Plaintiff s brief cites no authority to support it. And regardless, the availability of this requested relief is irrelevant to whether oral argument should be held in August or September. Additional compliance time at the back end does not make the entry of a preliminary injunction more urgent at the front end for a rule that, under no circumstances, will be applied to any party for the next nine months. 2. Answer Because Plaintiff served the U.S. Attorney on June 9, 2016, the Department s answer is currently due August 8, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a(2. The parties agree that it is unnecessary for the Department to answer the complaint during the pendency of the preliminary injunction motion, that the Department s duty to answer should be suspended indefinitely, and that the Court, on its own motion or by motion of the parties, may reinstate this duty at a later time. 3. Administrative Record Because the record material relevant to this action involves only a fraction of the voluminous administrative record, the parties propose an approach similar to the local rules in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (which routinely sees large administrative 8
9 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 9 of 11 records, whereby the government initially files an index to the administrative record. See D.D.C. Local Rule 7(n. If the Court is amenable to this approach, the Department will file an index to the administrative record certifying to the authenticity of its contents no later than August 1, 2016, and the Department will provide the full administrative record to the Plaintiff at that time by a mutually agreeable method. The parties will further stipulate that each may refer to portions of the administrative record as the party deems appropriate for purposes of this action, and each party will submit such portions of the record in the form of an appendix in advance of any preliminary injunction hearing that the Court sets in this matter. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Court should grant the parties joint motion for scheduling order. 9
10 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 10 of 11 Dated: June 30, 2016 CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A. James F. Jorden (DC No * Brian P. Perryman (DC No * 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 400 East Washington, D.C Telephone: ( Facsimile: ( CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A. Michael A. Valerio (CT No * John C. Pitblado (CT No * One State Street, Suite 1800 Hartford, Connecticut Telephone: ( Facsimile: ( WALTERS BENDER STROHBEHN & VAUGHAN, P.C. By: /s/ J. Michael Vaughan J. Michael Vaughan (KS Dist. No David M. Skeens (KS No City Center Square, 1100 Main Kansas City, Missouri Telephone: ( Facsimile: ( Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General JOHN R. PARKER United States Attorney JUDRY L. SUBAR Assistant Director /s/ Galen N. Thorp GALEN N. THORP (VA Bar No EMILY S. NEWTON (VA Bar No Trial Attorneys United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC Tel: ( ; Fax: ( Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiff *Admitted pro hac vice 10
11 Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 11 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 30 th day of June, 2016, I electronically filed the above and foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the Court s ECF system, which will send notification of said filing to all counsel of record. The undersigned further certifies that the above and foregoing document will be served via Federal Express-Overnight Delivery to the following: Attorney General of the U.S. at Washington D.C. U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC Tom Beall, Acting U.S Attorney for the District of Kansas Jackie Rapstine, Esq. 444 S.E. Quincy, Suite 290 Topeka, KS /s/ J. Michael Vaughan 11
Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779
Case 4:16-cv-00732-ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:16-cv M Document 44 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 3:16-cv-01476-M Document 44 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL
More informationCase 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-04540-WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in
More informationCase 4:16-cv ALM Document 8 Filed 10/17/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 770
Case 4:16-cv-00732-ALM Document 8 Filed 10/17/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 770 PLANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLAINTIFFS,
More informationCase 1:16-cv RJL Document 152 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00236-RJL Document 152 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., v. BRIAN NEWBY, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 9671 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 3:16-cv-01476-M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 9671 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL
More informationCase 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:06-cv-01708-CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. No. 06-1708 (CKK DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 2:17-cv MJP Document 217 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. :-cv--mjp DEFENDANTS
More informationCase 1:16-cv TSC Document 9 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:16-cv-01641-TSC Document 9 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEYOND NUCLEAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al., Defendants
More informationCase 1:17-cv RDM Document 91 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01330-RDM Document 91 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEAGHAN BAUER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELISABETH DeVOS, Secretary, U.S. Department
More informationCase 4:17-cv JLK Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2018 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:17-cv-10092-JLK Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2018 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA KEY WEST DIVISION CHABAD OF KEY WEST, INC., and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 97 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationCase 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.
Case :-cv-00-jlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DONALD TRUMP, in his
More informationCase 2:16-cv SWS Document 195 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10. James Kaste, Wyo. Bar No Timothy C. Fox, Montana Attorney General
Case 2:16-cv-00285-SWS Document 195 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 James Kaste, Wyo. Bar No. 6-3244 Timothy C. Fox, Montana Attorney General Deputy Attorney General Melissa Schlichting, Deputy Attorney General
More informationCase 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00295-LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LTD.,
More information2:11-cv PMD Date Filed 09/19/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
2:11-cv-02516-PMD Date Filed 09/19/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SOUTH
More informationCase 3:17-cv SK Document 82 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-sk Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General ALEX G. TSE Acting United States Attorney MARCIA BERMAN Assistant Branch Director KAREN S. BLOOM Senior
More informationCase 3:17-cv VC Document 48 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-00-vc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Mark McKane, P.C. (SBN 0 Austin L. Klar (SBN California Street San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: ( -00 Fax: ( -00 E-mail: mark.mckane@kirkland.com austin.klar@kirkland.com
More informationCase 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 4:15-cv-00386-CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, in his official
More information[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #18-5289 Document #1752834 Filed: 09/27/2018 Page 1 of 10 [NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AMERICAN FEDERATION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION
Case 4:14-cv-00139-HLM Document 34 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., and DAVID JAMES, Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., and DAVID JAMES, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. 4:14-CV-139-HLM U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
More informationSUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES
SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:
More informationNo (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1381 Document #1675253 Filed: 05/15/2017 Page 1 of 14 ORAL ARGUMENT REMOVED FROM CALENDAR No. 15-1381 (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationCase 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5
Case :-cv-00-raj Document Filed 0// Page of HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 CITY OF SEATTLE and CITY OF PORTLAND, vs. Plaintiffs, DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #19-5042 Document #1779028 Filed: 03/24/2019 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : DAMIEN GUEDUES, et al., : : No. 19-5042 Appellants : : Consolidated
More informationCase 1:17-cv RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01875-RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 ORGANIC TRADE ASSOCIATION, 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 445A Washington, DC 20001, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationCase 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-00350-CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION NYKOLAS ALFORD and STEPHEN THOMAS; and ACLU
More informationCase 2:17-cv MJP Document 238 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5
Case :0-cv-000-CW Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General BRIAN STRETCH United States Attorney ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Deputy Branch Director SUSAN K.
More informationCase 4:18-cv O Document 74 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID 879
Case 4:18-cv-00167-O Document 74 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID 879 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION TEXAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES
More information[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #18-5289 Document #1754028 Filed: 10/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 [NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AMERICAN FEDERATION
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 12/22/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:435 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:12-cv-06756 Document #: 43 Filed: 12/22/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:435 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CHRISTOPHER YEP, MARY ANNE YEP, AND TRIUNE HEALTH GROUP,
More informationCase 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-04540-WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-01427-TCB-WSD-BBM Document 160 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, et
More informationCase 1:17-cv MJG Document 146 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:17-cv-02459-MJG Document 146 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BROCK STONE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case 1:17-cv-02459-MJG DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationCase 1:15-cv CKK Document 8 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00646-CKK Document 8 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20024
More informationCase 1:17-cv JDB Document 86 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-02325-JDB Document 86 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCase 1:04-cv GBD-RLE Document 953 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00397-GBD-RLE Document 953 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
More informationCase 1:18-cv LY Document 32-2 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00295-LY Document 32-2 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LTD., and CONSUMER
More informationCase 1:16-cv ABJ Document 10 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-01402-ABJ Document 10 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY ) INFORMATION CENTER, ) ) Case No. 1:16-cv-01402 Plaintiff, )
More informationCase 2:17-cv MJP Document 211 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE.
Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. :-cv--mjp COURT
More informationCase 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9
Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE and SIERRA CLUB v. Plaintiffs, SCOTT PRUITT, in
More informationCase 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01295-TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-CV-01295 v. UNITED STATES
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk
July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178
More informationCase 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:16-cv-00315-NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9 JOHN R. GREEN Acting United States Attorney NICHOLAS VASSALLO (WY Bar #5-2443 Assistant United States Attorney P.O. Box 668 Cheyenne, WY 82003-0668
More informationCase 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-01814-PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENTUCKY ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-01814 LISA JACKSON,
More informationCase 7:16-cv O Document 85 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2792
Case 7:16-cv-00108-O Document 85 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2792 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INC.; SPECIALITY
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case: 17-3752 Document: 003113097118 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2018 No. 17-3752 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD J.
More informationCase 1:17-cv APM Document 38 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:17-cv-01371-APM Document 38 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ISAAC HARRIS, et al., v. MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ) INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ) PROJECT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) ) v. ) No. 17-1351 ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants-Appellants.
More informationCase 1:08-mc PLF Document 300 Filed 08/17/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-mc-00511-PLF Document 300 Filed 08/17/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In re BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION ) LITIGATION ) ) Misc. No. 08-mc-0511 (PLF)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:04-cv-01639-RJL Document 1090 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Federal National Mortgage ) Association Securities, Derivative, and ) MDL No. 1668
More informationCase 1:16-cv ABJ Document 8 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-01976-ABJ Document 8 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FADI ELSALAMEEN Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-1976 (ABJ) BANK OF PALESTINE,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #17-1038 Document #1666639 Filed: 03/17/2017 Page 1 of 15 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) CONSUMERS FOR AUTO RELIABILITY
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:13-cv-00834-PEC Document 46 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 20 In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-834C (E-Filed: October 16, 2014 DONALD MARTIN, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Case 118-cv-00608-YK Document 19 Filed 04/02/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:16-cv-00285-SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General MARISSA PIROPATO, Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural
More informationSUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17)
SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17) Justice: Law Clerk: Secretary: Part Clerk: HON. ROBERT A. BRUNO RACHEL ZAMPINO, ESQ. CORINNE GLANZMAN BILL
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:-cv-0-PJH Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C - PJH v. ORDER MARGARET A. HAMBURG, M.D., 0 Defendant.
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 2:17-cv-11630-NGE-RSW ECF No. 39 filed 07/23/18 PageID.509 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN MICHAEL BOWMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
More informationCase 7:16-cv O Document 100 Filed 11/20/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1792
Case 7:16-cv-00054-O Document 100 Filed 11/20/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1792 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS et al., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:10-cv GBL -TRJ Document 74 Filed 03/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 661
Case 1:10-cv-00765-GBL -TRJ Document 74 Filed 03/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 661 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil
More informationCase 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:14-cv-01311-APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, v. Plaintiff, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
More informationCHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A
CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A Article 9.1: Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: Centre means the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) established by the ICSID Convention;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. ) Case No. 1:16-cv (APM) MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:16-cv-01460 (APM) ) U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ) ADMINISTRATION, et al., )
More informationNOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING
AlaFile E-Notice To: CITY OF HUNTSVILLE (PRO SE 308 FOUNTAIN CIRCLE HUNTSVILLE, AL 35801-0000 Judge: D. ALAN MANN NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA JAMES HENDERSON
More informationCase 1:13-cv RDM Document 60 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-02007-RDM Document 60 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF REPTILE KEEPERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.
More informationUnited States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00731-ALM Document 98 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 4746 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:12-cv-04450-MAS-DEA Document 149 Filed 04/20/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 10104 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ) ENVIRONMENT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case Number: 03-4217-CV-C-NKL ) MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Administrator
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-02262 Document 1 Filed 12/20/11 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and ) ) COALITION FOR
More informationCase 1:16-cv JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-02113-JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AARP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, 401 North Main Street
More informationCase 3:17-cv WHO Document 108 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-who Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 0 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General BRIAN STRETCH United States Attorney JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director STEPHEN J. BUCKINGHAM (Md. Bar)
More informationCase 1:09-cv RWR Document 17 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:09-cv-02014-RWR Document 17 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, JACQUES
More informationCase 1:17-cv CKK Document 48 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01320-CKK Document 48 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-1320
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-02106-LMM Document 10 Filed 06/16/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TIMBERVEST, LLC; JOEL BARTH SHAPIRO; WALTER WILLIAM ANTHONY BODEN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,
0 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Acting Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HARRINGTON Assistant United States Attorney, E.D.WA JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director KENNETH E. SEALLS Trial Attorney U.S. Department of
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Virginia Eastern District Court Case No. 2:15-cv Bergano, D.D.S., P.C. et al v. City Of Virginia Beach et al
PlainSite Legal Document Virginia Eastern District Court Case No. 2:15-cv-00520 Bergano, D.D.S., P.C. et al v. City Of Virginia Beach et al Document 25 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of
CASE 0:14-md-02522-PAM Document 656 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MDL No. 14-2522 (PAM/JJK)
More informationJOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STEVEN WAYNE FISH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KRIS KOBACH, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Kansas, Defendant-Appellant.
More informationCase 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-00967 Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) HOME CARE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ) 412 First St, SE ) Washington, D.C. 20003
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT STATE OF NEVADA, et al., No. 16-41606 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Defendants-Appellants. APPELLEES OPPOSITION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.
Case 1:16-cv-01350 Document 1 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LANNETT COMPANY, INC., 13200 Townsend Road, Philadelphia, PA 19154 and LANNETT
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00287 Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VETERAN ESQUIRE LEGAL ) SOLUTIONS, PLLC, ) 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive ) Suite 400
More informationCase 3:12-cv WWE Document 44 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:12-cv-00355-WWE Document 44 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 3:12-CV-00355 (WWE DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 3:12-cv MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:12-cv-01072-MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 CYRIL B. KORTE, JANE E. KORTE, and KORTE & LUITJOHAN CONTRACTORS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationUNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS
Case 1:17-cv-00289-RBJ Document 30 Filed 06/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-289-RBJ ZAKARIA HAGIG, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-01116 Document 1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND ) 1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 600 ) Washington, D.C.
More informationU.S. District Court. Middle District of Florida
From: Williams, Stuart To: Cerio, Tim Cc: Stearns, Heather; Gibson, Ben Subject: FW: Activity in Case 8:14-cv-01341-CEH-TBM State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration et al v. United States
More informationCase 1:10-cv ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-01062-ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF GEORGIA, v. Plaintiff, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. in his official
More informationCase 1:16-cv TSC Document 4 Filed 08/15/16 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-01053-TSC Document 4 Filed 08/15/16 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK CRUMPACKER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLINE CIRAOLO-KLEPPER; MICHAEL MARTINEAU;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ) MANUFACTURERS ) 1331 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 600 ) Washington, D.C. 20004-1790 ) ) and ) ) COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC ) WORKPLACE
More informationORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases
USCA Case #15-1363 Document #1669991 Filed: 04/06/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 No. 15-1363 and Consolidated Cases IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
More informationCase 1:15-cv RMB Document 35 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice
Case 1:15-cv-00357-RMB Document 35 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 VIA ECF May 28, 2015 The
More informationCase 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00243-RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and ) NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ) ASSOCIATION, ) )
More informationCase 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52
Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52 Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 52 Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 3 of 52 Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More information