Detailed Table of Contents

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Detailed Table of Contents"

Transcription

1 Detailed Table of Contents Editors Note...iii Preface...v General Table of Contents...vii Detailed Table of Contents...ix Table of Cases... xxv Ch a p t e r On e Overview... 1 A. What is Evidence The Study of the Rules of Evidence Evidence Logic Maps Scope of the Text Features of the Casebook... 3 Logic Maps... 4 Electronic Casebook with Hyperlinks... 4 Cases, Statutes and Articles... 4 Legal Terminology... 4 Online Materials... 4 Text Boxes... 4 Names of Justices and Other Judges... 6 Court Websites... 6 Organizational and Government Websites... 6 Internal Cross-References... 6 FLEX Cases... 6 Case Excerpts... 7 Statutes and Rules... 7 Points for Discussion, Hypotheticals, and Perspective and Analysis... 8 Executive Summaries... 8

2 x Evidence A Contemporary Approach Ch a p t e r Tw o The Process of Proof and the Structure of Trial... 9 A. Introduction Witnesses and Physical Evidence... 9 Examples of Live Witness Testimony Examples of Tangible Physical Evidence: Real Examples of Tangible Physical Evidence: Demonstative Direct and Circumstantial Evidence B. The Role of the Judge The Time Limits of Presenting Evidence Rule 102. Purpose and Construction Rule 403. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time Rule 611. Mode and Order of Interrogation and Presentation United States v. Reaves Points for Discussion The Order of Witnesses and Their Testimony Stone v. Peacock Points for Discussion Comments on the Evidence Yates v. U.S Points for Discussion Questioning Witnesses Rule 614. Calling and Interrogation of Witnesses by Court Crandell v. United States Points for Discussion C. The Order of Proceeding Pretrial Conferences Pretrial Motions Selection of the Jury Opening Statements Presentation of the Evidence: Plaintiff s/prosecution s Case in Chief Direct Examination Cross-Examination Redirect Examination Objections Rule 103. Rules on Evidence Offers of Proof... 31

3 Table of Contents xi 6. Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendant s Case in Chief Rebuttal and Surrebuttal Closing Argument Jury Instructions Deliberations, Verdict, Judgment Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Th r e e Relevance A Primer A. Introduction...37 B. Definition of Relevant Evidence Rule 401. Definition of Relevant Evidence Rule 402. Relevant Evidence Generally Admissible; Irrelevant Evidence Inadmissible C. Determining Relevant Evidence...39 People v. Adamson Perspective and Analysis Points for Discussion D. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence F.R.E Relevant Evidence Generally Admissible; Irrelevant Evidence Inadmissible Rule Logic Map F.R.E Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion or Waste of Time Unfair Prejudice Other Less Frequently Used Counterweights Conducting the Balancing Test Rule 403 Map Carter v. Hewitt Old Chief v. United States Points for Discussion Judicial Determination of Preliminary Questions Rule 104. Preliminary Questions Judicial Determination of Conditional Relevancy Rule 104. Preliminary Questions Huddleston v. United States Points for Discussion Reverse Balancing of Rule Executive Summary... 67

4 xii Evidence A Contemporary Approach Ch a p t e r Fo u r Qualification of a Fact Witness A. Introduction...71 B. General Rule of Competency...72 Rule 601. General Rule of Competency C. Mentally Incapacitated Witnesses...72 United States v. Roach Points for Discussion D. Child Witnesses...75 Wheeler v. United States Points for Discussion E. Previously Hypnotized Witnesses...78 Rock v.arkansas Points for Discussion F. A Witness s Religious Beliefs...82 Rule 610. Religious Beliefs or Opinions Firemen s Fund Insurance Company v. Thien Points for Discussion G. Judges and Jurors as Witnesses...85 Rule 605. Competency of Judge as Witness Rule 606. Competency of Juror as Witness Tanner v. United States Points for Discussion H. Dead Man s Statutes...89 I. Other Prerequisites to Testifying Oath or Affirmation Rule 603. Oath or Affirmation United States v. Fowler Points for Discussion The Personal Knowledge Requirement Rule 602. Personal Knowledge McCrary-El v. Shaw Points for Discussion Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Fi v e Witnesses A. Direct Examination and Cross-Examination...99 Rule 611. Mode and Order of Interrogation and Presentation Direct Examination

5 Table of Contents xiii 2. Cross-Examination Refreshing a Witness s Memory Doty v. Elias Points for Discussion B. Impeachment of a Witness General Impeachment Guidelines: Impeaching a Party s Own Witness United States v. Morlang Points for Discussion General Impeachment Guidelines: Bolstering a Witness s Credibility U.S. v. Rosario-Diaz Points for Discussion Impeaching a Witness s Character for Truthfulness Rule 608. Evidence of Character and Conduct of a Witness a. Reputation and Opinion Evidence United States v. Whitmore Points for Discussion b. Specific Acts of Dishonesty United States v. Whitmore (continued) Points for Discussion Impeaching a Witness with Prior Convictions Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of a Crime United States v. Sanders Points for Discussion United States v. Hayes Points for Discussion Impeaching a Witness with a Prior Inconsistent Statement Rule 613. Prior Statements of Witnesses United States v. Young Points for Discussion Impeaching a Witness by Showing Bias United States v. Abel Points for Discussion An Extrinsic Evidence Chart Executive Summary

6 xiv Evidence A Contemporary Approach Ch a p t e r Six Hearsay A. Introduction The Idea Behind the Hearsay Rule The Trial of Sir Walter Raleigh Hearsay Risks Trial Safeguards B. Analysis Under the Rules Rule 802. The Hearsay Rule Rule 801. Definitions (Parts a-c) Rule 801(a). Statements Rule 801(b). Declarant Rule 801(c) Hearsay C. Utterances and Conduct That Are Not Hearsay Impeachment of a Witness Effect on the Listener (or Reader) McClure v. State Points for Discussion Verbal Acts Hanson v. Johnson Points for Discussion Circumstantial Evidence of Declarant s State of Mind, Memory or Belief D. Statements Which Are Not Hearsay by Definition Rule 801. Definitions (Part d) Rule 801(d) Statements Which Are Not Hearsay U.S. v. Barrett Points for Discussion Prior Consistent Statement to Rebut Charge of Fabrication Tome v. U.S Points for Discussion Prior Statement of Identification of a Person (801(d)(1)(C) United States v. Lewis Points for Discussion Rule 801(d)(2). Admission by Party Opponent Generally Personal Knowledge Not Required Personal Admissions No Self-Serving Statements Judicial Admissions

7 Table of Contents xv Adoptive Admissions Vicarious Admissions Party s Own Statement 801(d)(2)(A) Jewell v. CSX Transportation, Inc Points for Discussion Adopted Statement U.S. v. Morgan Points for Discussion Statement by Person Authorized 801(d)(2)(C) Kirk v. Raymark Industries Points for Discussion Statement by Party s Agent Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc Overview of the Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc Points for Discussion Statement by Coconspirator 801(d)(2)(E) Bourjaily v. United States Points for Discussion E. Hearsay within Hearsay Rule 805. Hearsay within Hearsay F. Hearsay Exceptions Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial Rule 803(1) Present Sense Impression Schindler v. Seiler Points for Discussion Rule 803(2) Excited Utterance City of Dallas v. Donovan Points for Discussion Comparison of 803(1) and 803(2) Rule 803(3) Then Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Hillmon Points for Discussion Casualty Insurance Co. v. Salinas Points for Discussion Rule 803(4) Statements for Purposes of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment State v. Moen

8 xvi Evidence A Contemporary Approach Points for Discussion Rule 803(5) Recorded Recollection U.S. v. Mornan Points for Discussion Rule 803(6) Records of Regularly Conducted Activity Keogh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Points for Discussion Rule 803(7) Absence of Entry in Records Kept in Accordance with the Provisions of Paragraph (6) Rule 803(8) Public Records and Reports Beech Aircraft v. Rainey Points for Discussion Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable Rule 804(a) Definition of Unavailability Rule 804(b)(1)-(6) Hearsay Exceptions Rule 804(b)(1) Former Testimony U.S. v. DiNapoli Points for Discussion Rule 804(b)(2) Statement Under Belief of Impending Death Rule 804(b)(3) Statement Against Interest Rule 804(b)(4) Statement of Personal or Family History Rule 804(b)(6) Forfeiture by Wrongdoing U.S. v. Gray Points for Discussion G. Residual Exception Rule 807 Residual Exception Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assur. Co Points for Discussion H. Remaining Exceptions Rule 803(9) Records of Vital Statistics Rule 803(10) Absence of Public Record or Entry Rule 803(11) Records of Religious Organizations Rule 803(12) Marriage, Baptismal and Similar Certificates Rule 803(13) Family Records Rule 803(14) Records of Documents Affecting and Interest in Property Rule 803(15) Statements in Documents Affecting an Interest in Property Rule 803(16) Statements in Ancient Documents

9 Table of Contents xvii Rule 803(17) Market Reports, Commercial Publications Rule 803(18) Learned Treatises Rule 803(19) Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History Rule 803(20) Reputation Concerning Boundaires or General History Rule 803(21) Reputation as to Character Rule 803(22) Judgment of Previous Conviction Rule 803(23) Judgment as to Personal, Family or General History or Boundaries Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Seven Hearsay and Constitutional Considerations A. The Sixth Amendment and the Hearsay Rule and Its Exception The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brief History of the Confrontation Clause: Sir Walter Raleigh s Case B. Hearsay Statements by Non-Testifying Declarants Ohio v. Roberts Points for Discussion Crawford v. Washington Points for Discussion Davis v. Washington Points for Discussion Perspective and Analysis C. Waiver of Confrontation Rights and Forfeiture by Wrongdoing Rule 804(b)(6) Forfeiture by Wrongdoing United States v. Scott Points for Discussion Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Ei g h t A Return to Relevance I: Limits Based on Policy A. Introduction B. Subsequent Remedial Measures Rule 407 Subsequent Remedial Measures The General Rule and the Feasability Exception

10 xviii Evidence A Contemporary Approach Anderson v. Malloy Points for Discussion The Impeachment Exception Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck and Company Points for Discussion C. Settlement Offers When Offered Primarily in a Civil Case Rule 408 Compromise and Offers to Compromise Pierce v. E.R. Tripler & Company Points for Discussion The Bias Exception John McShain, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Company Points for Discussion D. Payment for Medical Expenses Rule 409 Payment of Medical and Similar Expenses E. Plea Bargain Agreements in Criminal Cases Rule 410 Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements U.S. v. Mezzanato Points for Discussion F. Liability Insurance Rule 411 Liability Insurance Charter v. Chleborad Points for Discussion Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Ni n e A Return to Relevance II: Character and Habit A. Introduction Rule 404(a) Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes B. The General Rule Excluding Character Evidence Calvert v. United States Points for Discussion C. Exceptions to the General Rule: Character of a Defendant in a Criminal Case Rule 404(a)(1) & (2) Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes Rule 405 Methods of Proving Character

11 Table of Contents xix (a)(1) The Mercy Rule Michelson v. United States Points for Discussion Rules The Defendant s Character in Sexual Assault and Child Molestation Cases Rule 413 Evidence of Similar Crimes in Sexual Assault Cases Rule 414 Evidence of Similar Crimes in Child Molestation Cases Rule 415 Evidence of Similar Crimes in Civil Cases Concerning Sexual Assault or Child Molestation United States v. LeMay Points for Discussion D. Exceptions to the General Rule: Character of the Victim in a Criminal Case Rule 404(a)(2): Victim s Character Generally in Criminal Cases Rule 404(a)(1): Prosecution s Counterattack by Showing the Defendant s Bad Character Rule 404(a)(2): Character for Peacefulness of the Victim in a Homicide Case Rule 412: The Victim s Character in a Sex Offense Case Judd v. Rodman Points for Discussion E. Character Evidence Offered to Prove a Fact Other Than Character Rule 404(b) Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct; Exceptions; Other Crimes Rule 403 Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time Acts Offered to Prove Intent United States v. Hearst Points for Discussion Acts Offered to Prove Plan and Identity United States v. Carroll Points for Discussion Perspective and Analysis F. Character Evidence Offered to Prove an Element of a Charge, Claim or Defense Rule 405 Methods of Proving Character Schafer v. Time, Inc Points for Discussion G. Making Sense of Rules 404 and 405: A Recap Quick Reference Charts

12 xx Evidence A Contemporary Approach H. Habit and Routine Practice Rule 406 Habit; Routine Practice Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co Points for Discussion Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Ten Authentication A. Introduction Rule 901(a) Requirement of Authentication or Identification Rule 901(b) Illustrations B. Tangible Evidence United States v. Collado Points for Discussion Lockhart v. McCotter Points for Discussion C. Writings and Other Documents United States v. Bagaric Points for Discussion D. Voice Identification and Telephone Conversations United States v. Espinoza E. Photographs U.S. v. Hyles United States v. Soto-Beniquez United States v. Taylor F. Electronic Mail United States v. Safavian Internet and Evidence Gregory P. Joseph, Esq G. Self-Authenticating Rule 902 Self-Authentication H. Subscribing Witness s Testimony Rule 903 Subscribing Witness Testimony Unnecessary I. Demonstrative Evidence New Mexico v. Tollardo Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Eleven Best Evidence Rule A. Best Evidence Rule Rule 1001 Definitions and Basic Rule

13 Table of Contents xxi Rule 1002 Requirement of Original Rule 1003 Admissibility of Duplicates Rule 1004 Admissibility of Other Evidence of Contents What is a Writing, Recording or Photograph Seiler v. Lucasfilm, Ltd Points for Discussion When are the Contents of a Writing, Recording or Photograph at Issue? United States v. Bennett Points for Discussion Originals, Duplicates and Secondary Evidence United States v. Gerhart Points for Discussion The Admissibility of Summaries Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Tw e l v e Opinion Testimony Lay and Expert A. Lay Opinions Rule 701 Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses United States v. Yazzie Gorby v. Schneider Tank Lines, Inc Points for Discussion Kostelecky v. NL Acme Tool/NL Industries, Inc B. Expert Opinions Rule 702 Testimony by Experts Qualifications Polston v. Boomershine Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc Points for Discussion Is the Testimony Helpful to the Jury Direct Examination of Experts David Malone Reliability of Expert Testimony Frye v. United States Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc Points for Discussion General Electric Company v. Joiner Points for Discussion Kuhmo Tire Co. v. Carmichael Expert v. Lay Opinions United States v. Freeman

14 xxii Evidence A Contemporary Approach 4. Bases of Testimony Rule 703 Bases of Opinion Testimony by Experts South Central Petroleum, Inc. v. Long Brothers Oil Company Opinion on the Ultimate Issues Rule 704 Opinion on Ultimate Issue United States v. Lockett United States v. Finley Disclosure of Facts or Data Underlying Expert Opinion Rule 705 Disclosure of Facts or Data Underlying Expert Opinions Marsee v. United States Tobacco Company Court Appointed Experts Rule 706 Court Appointed Experts C. Scientific Evidence Hard Sciences Head v. Lithonia Corp., Inc Soft Sciences United States v. Powers Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Thirteen Privileges A. Introduction Rule 501 General Rule B. Attorney-Client Privilege Who is the Client Upjohn v. United States Points for Discussion Who is an Attorney or an Attorney s Representative? United States v. Kovel Points for Discussion What is Communication? United States v. Kendrick Points for Discussion Made in Confidence United States v. Evans Points for Discussion To Facilitate Legal Services United States v. Rowe Points for Discussion

15 Table of Cases xxiii 6. Waiver of Privilege Claiming the Privilege in Court: The Privilege Log Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Federal Rule of Civil Procedure C. Spousal Privileges The Adverse Testimonial Privilege Box Trammel v. United States Points for Discussion The Marital Communications Privilege United States v. Marashi Points for Discussion D. Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege Jaffee v. Redmond Points for Discussion E. Miscellaneous Privileges Clergy-Penitent Privilege Accountant-Client Privilege Journalist s Privilege Parent-Child Privilege F. Self-Incrimination Criminal v. Civil Persons Protected Scope of Privilege Incrimination Writings U.S. v. Doe Required Records and Reports Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Fourteen Judicial Notice A. Introduction Rule 201 Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts B. Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts The Difference Between Adjudicative and Legislative Facts United States v. Gould Perspective and Analysis Points for Discussion Judicial Notice in Civil Cases Kaggen v. Internal Revenue Service

16 xxiv Evidence A Contemporary Approach Points for Discussion Judicial Notice in Criminal Cases United States v. Jones Points for Discussion C. Facts Within the Personal Knowledge of the Judge United States v. Lewis Points for Discussion Executive Summary Ch a p t e r Fifteen Burdens and Presumptions A. Burden of Proof Burden of Production The Burden of Persuasion B. Standards of Proof C. Inferences and Presumptions Inferences Presumptions D. Presumptions in Civil Cases Rule 301 Presumptions in General in Civil Actions and Proceedings In Re Yoder Co Points for Discussion E. Presumptions in Criminal Cases County Court of Ulster County v. Allen Points for Discussion Executive Summary Ap p e n d i x A. The Federal Rules of Evidence Ap p e n d i x B. The Federal Rules of Evidence with Advisory Committee Notes Index...963

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources... Dedication... v About the Author... xvii Acknowledgments... xix Foreword... xxi Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources... xxvi Chapter 1 Trial Process and Procedure... 1 The Role of the Trial Judge

More information

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice, Index References in this index from 900 to 911 are to sections of the Wisconsin Rules of Evidence, and references from 1 to 33 are to chapters of this book. A Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, 902.01

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2017 The goal of this 2018 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy

More information

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading Part of a Continuum MBE Essay PT Memorize law Critical reading Identify relevant facts Marshal facts Communication skills

More information

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq. LIST OF CHAPTERS Chapter 1 PRETRIAL.............................................. 1 Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Chapter 2 MOTIONS IN LIMINE................................... 17 Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Chapter

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) In American trials complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to

More information

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE 2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"

More information

Thinking Evidentially

Thinking Evidentially Thinking Evidentially Writing & Arguing Powerful Motions October 17, 2013 2013 www.rossdalecle.com Presentation of Proof Plaintiff (or prosecutor) presents case-in-chief, then rests; When witnesses are

More information

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Admissibility of Electronic Evidence PAUL W. GRIMM AND KEVIN F. BRADY 2018 Potential Authentication Methods Email, Text Messages, and Instant Messages Trade inscriptions (902(7)) Certified copies of business

More information

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (ADOPTED 9/4/2012) INDEX ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101 Scope... 1 Rule 102 Purpose and Construction... 1 ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE... 1 Rule 201

More information

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that

More information

elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook

elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page ii elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page iii Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook

More information

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE Twelfth edition COLIN TAPPER, MA, BCL Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS Preface to the 12th edition v Extractfrom the preface

More information

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope These Simplified Federal Rules of Evidence (Mock Trial Version) govern the trial proceedings of the

More information

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION) SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION) The Supplement to the 2012 Edition of the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) is a complete revision of the Military

More information

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive TRIAL OBJECTIONS Albert E. Durkin, Esq. Miroballi Durkin & Rudin LLC Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive Will the answer hurt your case? Protecting the record

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2018 The goal of this 2019 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy

More information

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Federal Rules of Evidence Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope Rule 102. Purpose and Construction Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence Rule 104. Preliminary Questions Rule

More information

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) 2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that

More information

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators Jay E. Grenig Rocco M. Scanza Cornell University, ILR School Scheinman Institute on Conflict Resolution JURIS Questions

More information

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012)

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) of 27 2/26/2012 10:34 AM Published on Federal Evidence Review (http://federalevidence.com) Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) The Federal Rules of Evidence Page provides the current version of the Federal

More information

PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1

PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1 Preface xxv Acknowledgments xxix Art Credits xxxi About the Author xxxiii PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO EVIDENCE AND THE RULES OF EVIDENCE 2 Chapter Topics 2 Objectives

More information

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1 Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1 Class Schedule Fall 2015 Class# Day Date 1 Mon 17-Aug 2 Wed 19-Aug 3 Mon 24-Aug 4 Wed 26-Aug 5 Mon 31-Aug 6 Wed 2-Sep HOLIDAY Mon 7-Sep 7 Wed

More information

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy

More information

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Article IV: Relevancy and its Limits Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would

More information

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline Law applying to both FRE & CEC is in black Law applying to FRE only is in blue Law applying to CEC only is in red WHEN TO APPLY CALIFORNIA LAW - only on

More information

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. This seminar focuses on the fundamentals of evidence in Florida including documentary evidence, demonstrative evidence, expert testimony, trial objectives and

More information

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE Recognized Objections I. Authority RULE OBJECTION PAGE 001/002 Outside the Scope of the Ordinance 3 II. Rules of Form RULE OBJECTION PAGE RULE OBJECTION PAGE 003 Leading 3 004

More information

COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS

COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS EVIDENCE: COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS Topic 1: Introduction to the Law of Evidence Read: Text pages 1 9 Rules 101, 102, 1101 A. Addressing Societal Conflicts/Disputes 1. Name various ways we address

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE. GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: Section 1. A new Chapter is

More information

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE by Curtis E. Shirley RELEVANCE Indiana Evidence Rule 401: Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the

More information

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM.  EVIDENCE FULL OUTLINE www.barexamdoctor.com EVIDENCE I. RELEVANCE a. Definition i. Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the

More information

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) Rev. January 2015 This chart was prepared by Children s Law Center as a practice aid for attorneys representing children, parents, family

More information

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW AND THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE EXPERT WITNESSES DIVIDER 6 Professor Michael Johnson OBJECTIVES: After this session, you will be able to: 1. Distinguish

More information

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Last Updated: January 6, 2014 American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I. Rule 101. Scope; Definitions (a) Scope. These rules apply to proceedings in the courts of the State of

More information

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 These exceptions are allowed because the rules feel that they have inherent indicia of reliability. Therefore, they can be allowed even though they re hearsay. The

More information

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION SWEET & MAXWELL ;: THOMSON REUTERS PAGE Foreword Preface Table of Cases Table of Statutes Table of Civil Procedure Rules Table of Legislation

More information

Evidentiary Privileges

Evidentiary Privileges Evidentiary Privileges Sixth Edition (Grand Jury, Criminal and Civil Trials) CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE POWER OF THE GRAND JURY TO COMPEL TESTIMONY AND THE LAW S RIGHT TO EVERY PERSON S

More information

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence Vicki Voisin, ACP And Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. 2011 Vicki Voisin, Inc. and Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. All rights reserved. No part of this handout may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic

More information

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: This handout contains a detailed answer explanation for each Evidence question that appeared

More information

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Spring 2014) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 01/02/2014) Page 1

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Spring 2014) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 01/02/2014) Page 1 Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 01/02/2014) Page 1 Class Schedule Spring 2014 Class# Day Date 1 Mon 13-Jan 2 Wed 15-Jan HOLIDAY Mon 20-Jan 3 Wed 22-Jan 4 Mon 27-Jan 5 Wed 29-Jan 6 Mon 3-Feb 7 Wed

More information

Evidence: The Objection Method Fifth Edition

Evidence: The Objection Method Fifth Edition Evidence: The Objection Method Fifth Edition (2016 Pub.3052) Evidence: The Objection Method Fifth Edition Dennis D. Prater Connell Teaching Professor of Law, University of Kansas School of Law Daniel J.

More information

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows:

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows: Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows: Article 1. General Provisions. Rule 101. Scope. These rules govern proceedings in the courts of

More information

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) Rev. January 2017 This chart was prepared by Children s Law Center as a practice aid for attorneys representing children, parents, family

More information

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES Speakers: Honorable Krystal Q. Alves, Circuit Court Honorable

More information

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1 DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE Title 6 Page 1 TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 GENERAL 6-1-1 Scope, Purpose and Construction 6-1-2

More information

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA GLOBAL Headquarters the gregor building 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION About This Course... 2 Video... 2 The Law-Fact Distinction... 3 The Trial Setting... 3 Trial

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dustin has been charged with participating

More information

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE 3 credit hours Prepared by: Mark A. Byington Revised by: Mark A. Byington Revised Date: August 2014 Dr. Sandy Frey, Chair, Social Science

More information

EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006

EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006 Katz EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006 I. RELEVANCE Threshold Question: What is the purpose for this offer of evidence? -Where we start, almost all other areas of evidence law rely on relevance LOGICAL RELEVANCE:

More information

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, 2016 ARTICLE I. Rule 101. Rule 102. Rule 103. Rule 104. Rule 105. Rule 106. Rule 107. ARTICLE II. Rule 201. Rule 202. Rule 203. Rule 204. ARTICLE III. Rule 301.

More information

MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE

MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE Last reviewed and edited December 15, 2011 Including amendments effective January 1, 2012 MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE TABLE OF RULES ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS RULE: 101. SCOPE. 102. PURPOSE AND CONSTRUCTION.

More information

GUAM CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 6 EVIDENCE UPDATED THROUGH P.L (JUNE 12, 2015)

GUAM CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 6 EVIDENCE UPDATED THROUGH P.L (JUNE 12, 2015) GUAM CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 6 EVIDENCE UPDATED THROUGH P.L. 33-051 (JUNE 12, 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE 6 EVIDENCE DIVISION 1 GUAM RULES OF EVIDENCE DIVISION 2 PRINCIPLES OF EVIDENCE Chapter 1. General

More information

6. Secondary evidence rule. 7. CEC 352 discretion to exclude for unfair prejudice. a 2/3 vote by legislature after 1982.

6. Secondary evidence rule. 7. CEC 352 discretion to exclude for unfair prejudice. a 2/3 vote by legislature after 1982. EVIDENCE OUTLINE 1. Key CA Distinction ( Truth in Evidence Amendment) a. Proposition 8 makes all relevant evidence admissible in a criminal case. i. Exceptions: 1. Exclusionary rules under the US Constitution

More information

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct John Rubin UNC School of Government April 2010 What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct Issues Theories Character directly in issue Character as circumstantial

More information

Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN

Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN Evid. R. 401 Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination

More information

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES K.I.S.S. TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES Paul S. Milich Georgia State University College of Law Atlanta, Georgia 1 of 9 Institute of Continuing Legal Education K.I.S.S Keep It Short & Simple November 14, 2014

More information

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses N.J.R.E 601. General Rule of Competency Every person is competent to be a witness unless (a) the judge finds that the proposed witness is incapable of

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dave brought his sports car into

More information

Evidence Problems and Materials Fifth Edition

Evidence Problems and Materials Fifth Edition Evidence Problems and Materials Fifth Edition LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Professor of Law Pepperdine University School of Law Bridgette Carr Clinical Professor of Law University

More information

RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS

RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS Digital evidence or electronic evidence is any probative information stored or transmitted in digital form that a party to a court case may use at trial. The use of digital

More information

Antitrust Evidence Handbook. Third Edition

Antitrust Evidence Handbook. Third Edition Antitrust Evidence Handbook Third Edition CONTENTS Foreword... xi Preface... xiii Chapter I Hearsay Issues Most Relevant in Antitrust Cases... 1 A. Procedural Matters... 6 1. Evidentiary Burden... 6 2.

More information

CONTENTS. vii. Acknowledgments

CONTENTS. vii. Acknowledgments CONTENTS Acknowledgments xvii Chapter 1 The Role and Importance of Depositions 1 The Essentials: Preparation and an Understanding of the Deposition Process 1 How the Book Approaches Depositions 4 The Use

More information

THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005

THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005 THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005 The ability to call the state laws to witness must be given prime importance, without being influenced solely by what is said by the incumbents. Zhabdrung Rimpochhe THE

More information

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question. MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Criminal trials are conducted using strict rules of evidence to promote fairness. To participate in a Mock Trial, you need to know its rules of evidence. The California

More information

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Revised August 2015 Rules Unique to Middle School Mock Trial I. Invention of Facts and Extrapolation The object of these rules is to prevent a team

More information

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq. EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS Laurie Vahey, Esq. KINDS OF EVIDENCE Testimonial Including depositions Make sure you comply with CPLR requirements Experts Real Documentary Demonstrative Visual aid

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Paul sued David in federal court

More information

Wert v. Mesesick, No CnC (Katz, J., Apr. 7, 2005)

Wert v. Mesesick, No CnC (Katz, J., Apr. 7, 2005) Wert v. Mesesick, No. 1330-00 CnC (Katz, J., Apr. 7, 2005) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying

More information

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS Case 1:17-cr-00350-KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 Post to docket. GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS 6/11/18 Hon. Katherine B. Forrest I. INTRODUCTION

More information

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and:

More information

Recanting Victims 7/19/2018. Goals of Presentation. Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial

Recanting Victims 7/19/2018. Goals of Presentation. Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial Recanting Victims SIMONE HYLTON SENIOR ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY STONE MOUNTAIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Goals of Presentation Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial Give tools to use

More information

The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: So it makes some sense to go straight to Rule 1101, even though it is

The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: So it makes some sense to go straight to Rule 1101, even though it is ALABAMA RULES OF EVIDENCE BACK TO THE BASICS The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: Rule 101. Scope. These rules govern proceedings in the courts of the State of Alabama to the

More information

Evidence. I) Relevance

Evidence. I) Relevance Evidence I) Relevance A) Rule 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence": "Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination

More information

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice Impeachment by omission Impeachment for inconsistent statement The Evidence Dance Opening Statement Tip Twice Closing Argument The Love Boat Story: A Vicious Tale Top Six Objections Evidence Review Housekeeping

More information

y LEGAL ASPECTS OF EVIDENCE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 3 FALL 2015

y LEGAL ASPECTS OF EVIDENCE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 3 FALL 2015 y LEGAL ASPECTS OF EVIDENCE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 3 FALL 2015 Instructor: Steven J. Katz POPP@ARTC - WLAC Course Section No.7572 Mon-Wed. 7:35 9:00 a.m. ARTC E-mail: katzsj@wlac.edu Message Telephone:(310)

More information

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1 Article 6. Witnesses. Rule 601. General rule of competency; disqualification of witness. (a) General rule. Every person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules. (b) Disqualification

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED April 3, 2007 v No. 262858 St. Joseph Circuit Court LISA ANN DOLPH-HOSTETTER, LC No. 00-010340-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

A Student s Guide to Hearsay REVISED 4th Edition

A Student s Guide to Hearsay REVISED 4th Edition A Student s Guide to Hearsay REVISED 4th Edition LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board William Araiza Professor of Law Brooklyn Law School Lenni B. Benson Professor of Law & Associate Dean for

More information

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE FIFTEENTH EDITION

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE FIFTEENTH EDITION THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE FIFTEENTH EDITION -^ LONDON > SWEET & MAXWELL -;* j 2000 Preface Table of Cases Table of Statutes Table of Statutory Instruments Table of Civil Procedure Rules

More information

Evidence Lessons. Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction

Evidence Lessons. Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction Evidence Lessons Best Evidence Rule Under the Federal Rules... 1 Character Evidence Under Federal Rules... 1 The Concept of Hearsay... 1 Confrontation of Hearsay Declarants... 2 The Definition of Hearsay

More information

I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee

I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee comments? 3. Why is this the best objection? Is there

More information

HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION

HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION 2012 - HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Trial Overview 1 A. Governing Rules 1 B. Trial Basics 1 II. Opening Statements 2 A. Structure And Outline To Organize Your

More information

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence July 21, 2016 Drew DeVoogd, Member Patent Trial Proceedings in the United States In patent matters, trials typically occur in the federal

More information

Book containing this chapter and any forms referenced herein is available for purchase at or by calling

Book containing this chapter and any forms referenced herein is available for purchase at   or by calling The chapter from which this excerpt was taken was first published by IICLE in the 2018 edition of Medical Malpractice and is posted or reprinted with permission. Book containing this chapter and any forms

More information

Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney

Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney ATTACKING THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS The theory of attack by prior inconsistent statements is not based on the assumption

More information

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE effective March 1, 2013

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE effective March 1, 2013 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE effective March 1, 2013 ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS (F) a hearing on justification for pretrial detention not involving bail; RULE 101. TITLE AND SCOPE Title. These rules shall

More information

Policy Number OHS.RES.015 Date of Issue March 2003 Review Dates October 2014 Policy Owner(s) Compliance and Privacy Research Administration

Policy Number OHS.RES.015 Date of Issue March 2003 Review Dates October 2014 Policy Owner(s) Compliance and Privacy Research Administration I. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish procedures for handling alleged research misconduct at Ochsner Health System (OHS). II. III. Scope This policy and the associated procedures apply

More information

Evidence Update. ISBA Criminal Law Seminar. April 17, 2015

Evidence Update. ISBA Criminal Law Seminar. April 17, 2015 Evidence Update ISBA Criminal Law Seminar April 17, 2015 Laurie Kratky Doré Ellis and Nelle Levitt Distinguished Professor of Law Drake University Law School Overview Focus upon Iowa Supreme Court s evidentiary

More information

PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE Jeffrey K. Anderson, Esq. Anderson, Moschetti & Taffany, PLLC 26 Century Hill Drive, Suite 206 Latham, New York 12110 anderson@amtinjurylaw.com

More information

Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense

Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense Impeachment The Story: Murder Trial Witness: At 11 p.m. I saw defendant, 150 feet away, hit the victim over the head. At prior codefendant s trial: I could see because

More information

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS FRE

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS FRE EVIDENCE OUTLINE Why have federal rules of evidence? We want to 1) Reign in the parties in an adversary system; 2) We don t fully trust juries; 3) Time is short; 4) We want people to consult attorneys

More information

CIVIL EVIDENCE (JERSEY) LAW 2003

CIVIL EVIDENCE (JERSEY) LAW 2003 CIVIL EVIDENCE (JERSEY) LAW 2003 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2013 This is a revised edition of the law Civil Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 Arrangement CIVIL EVIDENCE (JERSEY) LAW 2003

More information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ABOUT THE AUTHOR. Chapter Objectives 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. CIVIL LAW 2

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ABOUT THE AUTHOR. Chapter Objectives 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. CIVIL LAW 2 PREFACE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ABOUT THE AUTHOR xxix xxxiii xxxv 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE COURT SYSTEM 1 Chapter Objectives 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. CIVIL LAW 2 A. What Is Civil Law? 2 B. How Does Civil Law Differ

More information

Response To Motions In Limine, Knuth v. City of Lincoln et al, Docket No. 3:11-cv (C.D. Ill. Jul 01, 2011)

Response To Motions In Limine, Knuth v. City of Lincoln et al, Docket No. 3:11-cv (C.D. Ill. Jul 01, 2011) The John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Institutional Repository Court Documents and Proposed Legislation 7-1-2011 Response To Motions In Limine, Knuth v. City of Lincoln et al, Docket No. 3:11-cv-03185

More information

EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW

EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW I. GENERAL REMARKS A. Accountability (Advocate) 1. Just you 2. No one else is there for client - never do or say anything that goes

More information

Evidence: The Objection Method Fourth Edition

Evidence: The Objection Method Fourth Edition Evidence: The Objection Method Fourth Edition LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board William Araiza Professor of Law Brooklyn Law School Lenni B. Benson Professor of Law & Associate Dean for Professional

More information

DISTRICT COURT EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 885 E. Chambers Road P.O. Box 597 Eagle, Colorado Plaintiff: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO.

DISTRICT COURT EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 885 E. Chambers Road P.O. Box 597 Eagle, Colorado Plaintiff: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. DISTRICT COURT EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 885 E. Chambers Road P.O. Box 597 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Plaintiff: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. Defendant: KOBE BEAN BRYANT. σ COURT USE ONLY σ Case Number: 03

More information

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial C H A P T E R 1 0 Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial O U T L I N E Introduction Pretrial Activities The Criminal Trial Stages of a Criminal Trial Improving the Adjudication Process L E A R N I

More information