TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES
|
|
- Drusilla Shaw
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3
4
5 K.I.S.S. TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES Paul S. Milich Georgia State University College of Law Atlanta, Georgia
6
7 1 of 9 Institute of Continuing Legal Education K.I.S.S Keep It Short & Simple November 14, 2014 Top Ten New Evidence Rules Paul S. Milich Professor of Law and Director of Advocacy Program Georgia State University, College of Law (1) So that s how we do it Rule 104 and Preliminary Fact Questions New O.C.G.A : (a) Preliminary questions concerning the qualification of a person to be a witness, the existence of a privilege, or the admissibility of evidence shall be determined by the court, subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this Code section. In making its determination, the court shall not be bound by the rules of evidence except those with respect to privileges. Preliminary questions shall be resolved by a preponderance of the evidence standard. (b) When the relevancy of evidence depends upon the fulfillment of a condition of fact, the court shall admit it upon, or subject to, the introduction of evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition. All evidentiary issues are now decided by the trial judge. Technical legal issues are subject to rule 104(a). Relevance based objections (e.g., authentication) are subject to 104(b). Rule 104(a) Rule 104(b) Who makes the final decision? Judge Jury What evidence may the any non privileged same evidence the trial court consider? evidence jury will hear (incl. hearsay) Standard of proof for preponderance could a reasonable admission of the evidence jury find...
8 2 of 9 In determining whether a preliminary question of fact is a subsection (a) issue or a subsection (b) issue, apply this simple test: If the objection before the court is valid, would that destroy the relevance of the evidence for the purpose for which it is offered? If the answer is Yes, then it is a 104(b) question. If the answer is No, then it is a 104(a) question. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, 3.7 (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Trial Court Rulings (West). (2) It can t be this easy the New Business Record Exception O.C.G.A (11) allows the use of a certification to lay foundation for a business record. A party intending to offer a record into evidence under this paragraph [902(11)] shall provide written notice of such intention to all adverse parties and shall make the record and declaration available for inspection sufficiently in advance of their offer into evidence to provide an adverse party with a fair opportunity to challenge such record and declaration. O.C.G.A (6) allows opinions in the record as long as the court is convinced, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the opinions meet the requirements of (lay opinions) or (expert opinions). Multiple hearsay in the record. The exception includes sources of information who had a business duty to report and who reported at or about the time of the events described. Any information provided by another person, if an outsider to the business preparing the record, must itself fall within a hearsay exception to be admissible. U.S. v. Gwathney, 465 F.3d 1133, 1141 (10 th Cir. 2006). Records prepared for purposes of litigation do not qualify under the business records rule. (But see, medical narrative statute, renumbered ). Integrated Records Rule A business may lay foundation for a record generated by another business. The foundation witness must testify as to how the originating business produced the record in order to satisfy the statutory requirements that the record was made in the regular course of business at or near the time of the events described in the record. The witness may obtain this knowledge by documents supplied by the business that produced the records or by speaking to counterparts in the originating business. This is not objectionable as hearsay since the foundation is a preliminary question subject to O.C.G.A (a) which allows the trial judge to consider any non-privileged evidence, including hearsay, in determining whether the foundation is met. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, (West ). COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Business Records (West).
9 3 of 9 (3) Does the cop have to testify? Public Records New O.C.G.A (8) creates a hearsay exception for... Public records and reports. Except as otherwise provided by law, public records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices, setting forth: (A) The activities of the public office; (B) Matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, against the accused in criminal proceedings, matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel in connection with an investigation; or (C) In civil proceedings and against the state in criminal proceedings, factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness. There are three generic categories of public records under the new rules. The first, (A), mundane records of the office or agency, are admissible without restriction in civil and criminal cases. The second category, (B), matters observed pursuant to duty, is unavailable to the prosecution in a criminal case when the author or sources of the information are law enforcement acting in an investigative capacity. When a law enforcement official prepares a report as a mundane, ministerial function, and not in the course of an investigation, the report is admissible. Thus, for example, an intoxilyzer inspection certification is admissible without the testimony of the inspector under this exception. The third category, (C), investigative reports, is completely unavailable to the prosecution in a criminal case. For example, a crime lab report is inadmissible in a criminal trial without the testimony of someone from the crime lab. Of course, if the author of or sources in the report testify at trial, the report may be used, with proper foundation, to refresh recollection ( ) or as past recollections recorded ( (5)). Motor vehicle accident reports are inadmissible under O.C.G.A : Neither any accident report filed with the Department of Transportation, the action taken by the Department of Driver Services pursuant to this chapter, the findings, if any, of the department upon which such action is based, nor the security filed as provided in this chapter shall be referred to in any way, nor shall they be any evidence of the negligence or due care of either party, at the trial of any action at law to recover damages. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Public Records (West)
10 4 of 9 (4) Finis res gestae! Now what? (803(1),(2),(3)) As Professor Morgan wrote nearly a hundred years ago: The marvelous capacity of a Latin phrase to serve as a substitute for reasoning, and the confusion of thought inevitably accompanying the use of inaccurate terminology, are no where better illustrated than in the decisions dealing with the admissibility of evidence as res gestae. The new rules replace res gestae with three descriptive hearsay exceptions that have worked well in federal and state courts for the past 30 plus years: 803(1), (2), and (3). 803(1): A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition or immediately thereafter. 803(2): A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition. 803(3): A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition, such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health, but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless such statements relate to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of the declarant's will and not including a statement of belief as to the intent of another person. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Present Sense Impression, Excited Utterance, Statement of Mind/Body/Emotion Exception to Hearsay (West). (5) My truck driver shouldn t have said that Agent Admissions The new rules clarify and broaden the scope of agency admissions in contrast to prior Georgia law. New O.C.G.A (d)(2)(D) sets forth two simple requirements for an agent or employee admission: (1) the statement was made during the agency or employment relationship; and, (2) the subject matter of the statement concerns a matter the agent or employee would know about by virtue of his agent or employee duties. Thus even though an employee may not have been authorized to make the statement in question, the court may admit it over a hearsay objection if it meets the requirements of this subsection. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Agency Admissions (West).
11 5 of 9 (6) My co-conspirator shouldn t have said that Co-Conspirator Admissions the Return of the In Furtherance Requirement New O.C.G.A (d)(2)(E): A statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy, including a statement made during the concealment phase of a conspiracy. A conspiracy need not be charged in order to make a statement admissible under this subparagraph. The new rule restores Georgia s co-conspirator exception to its original common law form by explicitly requiring that the statement have been in furtherance of the conspiracy. The jury is no longer instructed on application of this hearsay exception. Under the new rules, the judge alone decides whether, by a preponderance of the evidence, the foundation exists to allow admission of the statement. The court may consider the offered statement along with other evidence in making this determination but the offered statement alone is not sufficient to establish the basis for its admissibility but must be supported by independent evidence. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Co- Conspirator s Statements (West). (7) I did a bad, bad thing Statements Against Penal Interest New O.C.G.A (b)(3) A statement against interest is a statement: (A) Which a reasonable person in the declarant's position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it was so contrary to the declarant's proprietary or pecuniary interest or had so great a tendency to invalidate a claim by the declarant against another or to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability The new rule admits statements against penal interest when the declarant is unavailable to testify at trial. As a condition to using the exception, the proponent (whether the prosecutor or defense counsel) must show that the statement is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Statements Against Interest (West).
12 6 of 9 (8) We ve lost our Bent of Mind Restoration of the Character Rule in Criminal Trials Georgia was the only jurisdiction in the English speaking universe that admitted evidence of the accused s unrelated past crimes and other bad acts to prove his bent of mind or course of conduct. The new rules reboot the law in this area by adopting Federal Rule 404(b) which follows the traditional common law approach of admitting evidence of the accused s other crimes, wrongs, or acts when specifically relevant to the necessary proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. New O.C.G.A (b). The accused also may use 404(b) when relevant. Rule 404(b) applies to civil as well as criminal cases. New O.C.G.A : DUI exceptions: (paraphrasing the statute) (1) If defendant in this case refused the test and testifies that he did so for reasons that would be rebutted by the fact that he took the test in a prior instance and was convicted, then the prior is admissible in rebuttal. (2) Where defendant claims he was not the driver, a prior DUI is admissible to prove identity. McMullen v. State, 316 Ga. App. 684, n.30, 730 S.E.2d 151 (2012) ( We note in passing that the new evidence code adopted by the Georgia General Assembly, effective January 1, 2013, eliminates the bent-of-mind and course-of-conduct exception to similar-transaction character evidence. ) Jones v. State, Ga. App. (2014 WL ). See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Independent Crimes or Acts (West). (9) Didn t you lie to your parents about where you were going? Unrelated acts of lying as a tool of impeachment Rule 608(b) Former Georgia law did not allow a cross-examiner to question a witness about past acts of untruthfulness, unrelated to the case, to impeach that witness s credibility. New O.C.G.A (b)(1) gives the trial court discretion to allow such questions but the cross-examiner must accept the witness s answer. See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, 14.5 (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Character Witnesses (West)
13 7 of 9 (10) You can say this but you can t say that Factual Bases of Expert Opinions Under the new rules, an expert in a criminal or civil case may base her opinion on inadmissible evidence, including hearsay, if the facts are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject. New O.C.G.A In a jury trial, the otherwise inadmissible facts upon which the expert relied shall not be disclosed to the jury by the proponent of the opinion or inference unless the court determines that their probative value in assisting the jury to evaluate the expert's opinion substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect. Opposing counsel may inquire into any and all factual bases of an expert s opinion. There is no change in the basic rule that an expert may not be a mere conduit for the opinions of other experts not before the court. Although an expert may base her opinion, in part, on what she learned from other experts, the testifying expert must have, and be able to defend, her own opinion, arrived at independently. Factual Bases of Expert s Opinion Facts Opinion Admissible? May Disclose Facts to Jury? Otherwise admissible Yes Yes Inadmissible BUT reasonably relied upon by experts in field Yes No (unless special showing) Inadmissible and NOT only if facts not No reasonably relied upon essential to opinion by experts in field See, Milich, GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE, 15.5 (West ) COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE, 2014 ed., Expert Witnesses Examination at Trial (West)
14 8 of 9 For an overview of 38 significant changes from the old rules to the new rule, see, Georgia s New Evidence Code An Overview, 28 Ga. St.L.Rev. 379 (2012) (may be downloaded for free from the GSU Law Review website) Conversion Table Pre-2013 Georgia Statutes that Have Been Retained and Renumbered (some with modifications) (If a pre-2013 code section from Title 24 is not on the list below, it was abolished) Pre-2013 Statute New 2013 Statute (4) to to to to to to to et seq et seq to to to to to , 21, , 21, to to
15 9 of to to (b) to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 154 Professor Milich s books: GEORGIA RULES OF EVIDENCE and COURTROOM HANDBOOK ON GEORGIA EVIDENCE are available from: West Publishing
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy
More informationOklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope
Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope These Simplified Federal Rules of Evidence (Mock Trial Version) govern the trial proceedings of the
More informationEMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE
EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE Recognized Objections I. Authority RULE OBJECTION PAGE 001/002 Outside the Scope of the Ordinance 3 II. Rules of Form RULE OBJECTION PAGE RULE OBJECTION PAGE 003 Leading 3 004
More informationThinking Evidentially
Thinking Evidentially Writing & Arguing Powerful Motions October 17, 2013 2013 www.rossdalecle.com Presentation of Proof Plaintiff (or prosecutor) presents case-in-chief, then rests; When witnesses are
More informationRULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003
Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"
More information2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)
2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) In American trials complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (ADOPTED 9/4/2012) INDEX ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101 Scope... 1 Rule 102 Purpose and Construction... 1 ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE... 1 Rule 201
More informationDELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that
More information2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE
2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dave brought his sports car into
More informationRules of Evidence (Abridged)
Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Article IV: Relevancy and its Limits Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would
More informationFederal Rules Of Evidence (2012)
of 27 2/26/2012 10:34 AM Published on Federal Evidence Review (http://federalevidence.com) Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) The Federal Rules of Evidence Page provides the current version of the Federal
More informationTRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive
TRIAL OBJECTIONS Albert E. Durkin, Esq. Miroballi Durkin & Rudin LLC Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive Will the answer hurt your case? Protecting the record
More informationAmerican Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE
Last Updated: January 6, 2014 American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I. Rule 101. Scope; Definitions (a) Scope. These rules apply to proceedings in the courts of the State of
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Paul sued David in federal court
More informationTRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE
TRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE SECTION 1: JUDGE S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Thoroughly know all of the Simplified Rules of Evidence and Trial Procedure Rules and make sure they are strictly enforced
More informationFederal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Federal Rules of Evidence Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope Rule 102. Purpose and Construction Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence Rule 104. Preliminary Questions Rule
More informationHEARSAY OBJECTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS. By Simon H. Bloom & Ryan E. Harbin Bloom Sugarman, LLP
HEARSAY OBJECTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS By Simon H. Bloom & Ryan E. Harbin Bloom Sugarman, LLP The analysis of a hearsay problem whether you re thinking as the proponent of a statement or planning your objections
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: Section 1. A new Chapter is
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2017 The goal of this 2018 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy
More informationIndex. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,
Index References in this index from 900 to 911 are to sections of the Wisconsin Rules of Evidence, and references from 1 to 33 are to chapters of this book. A Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, 902.01
More informationPRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES
PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES Speakers: Honorable Krystal Q. Alves, Circuit Court Honorable
More informationMIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE
MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Revised August 2015 Rules Unique to Middle School Mock Trial I. Invention of Facts and Extrapolation The object of these rules is to prevent a team
More informationRule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1
Article 6. Witnesses. Rule 601. General rule of competency; disqualification of witness. (a) General rule. Every person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules. (b) Disqualification
More informationKeith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC
Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and:
More informationAdmissibility of Electronic Evidence
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence PAUL W. GRIMM AND KEVIN F. BRADY 2018 Potential Authentication Methods Email, Text Messages, and Instant Messages Trade inscriptions (902(7)) Certified copies of business
More informationChapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows:
Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows: Article 1. General Provisions. Rule 101. Scope. These rules govern proceedings in the courts of
More informationSIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE In trials in the United States, elaborate rules are used to regulate the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dustin has been charged with participating
More informationExample: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.
MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Criminal trials are conducted using strict rules of evidence to promote fairness. To participate in a Mock Trial, you need to know its rules of evidence. The California
More informationEVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline
EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline Law applying to both FRE & CEC is in black Law applying to FRE only is in blue Law applying to CEC only is in red WHEN TO APPLY CALIFORNIA LAW - only on
More informationEvidence Update. ISBA Criminal Law Seminar. April 17, 2015
Evidence Update ISBA Criminal Law Seminar April 17, 2015 Laurie Kratky Doré Ellis and Nelle Levitt Distinguished Professor of Law Drake University Law School Overview Focus upon Iowa Supreme Court s evidentiary
More informationDEQUAN SHAKEITH SAPP OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS March 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
PRESENT: All the Justices DEQUAN SHAKEITH SAPP OPINION BY v. Record No. 011244 JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS March 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA In this appeal, we consider
More informationWhy? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading
Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading Part of a Continuum MBE Essay PT Memorize law Critical reading Identify relevant facts Marshal facts Communication skills
More informationSIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: This handout contains a detailed answer explanation for each Evidence question that appeared
More informationEVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.
EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS Laurie Vahey, Esq. KINDS OF EVIDENCE Testimonial Including depositions Make sure you comply with CPLR requirements Experts Real Documentary Demonstrative Visual aid
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
1 1 Innocence Legal Team 00 S. Main Street, Suite Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: -000 Attorney for Defendant SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) Case No. CALIFORNIA, ) ) POINTS
More informationNew Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses
New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses N.J.R.E 601. General Rule of Competency Every person is competent to be a witness unless (a) the judge finds that the proposed witness is incapable of
More informationGeorgia's New Evidence Code - An Overview
Georgia State University Law Review Volume 28 Issue 2 Winter 2012 Article 3 March 2012 Georgia's New Evidence Code - An Overview Paul S. Milich pmillich@gsu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr
More informationDomestic Violence Evidence Issues
John Rubin Institute of Government 919-962-2498 rubin@iogmail.iog.unc.edu April 2002 Domestic Violence Evidence Issues I. What Is Hearsay? Problems Which of the following statements constitutes hearsay,
More informationFed. R. Evid. 804(b)(3) The statement against interest exception.
Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(3) The statement against interest exception. 1 The declarations against interest exception is sometimes confused with the exemption for admissions. (Note: Under the restyled rules,
More informationEvidence. I) Relevance
Evidence I) Relevance A) Rule 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence": "Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question While driving their cars, Paula
More informationFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2018 The goal of this 2019 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy
More informationHearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804
Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 These exceptions are allowed because the rules feel that they have inherent indicia of reliability. Therefore, they can be allowed even though they re hearsay. The
More informationEvidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.
Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. This seminar focuses on the fundamentals of evidence in Florida including documentary evidence, demonstrative evidence, expert testimony, trial objectives and
More informationWhat s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct
John Rubin UNC School of Government April 2010 What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct Issues Theories Character directly in issue Character as circumstantial
More informationTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND
THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW AND THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE EXPERT WITNESSES DIVIDER 6 Professor Michael Johnson OBJECTIVES: After this session, you will be able to: 1. Distinguish
More informationFULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE
FULL OUTLINE www.barexamdoctor.com EVIDENCE I. RELEVANCE a. Definition i. Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the
More informationImpeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice
Impeachment by omission Impeachment for inconsistent statement The Evidence Dance Opening Statement Tip Twice Closing Argument The Love Boat Story: A Vicious Tale Top Six Objections Evidence Review Housekeeping
More informationTHE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005
THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005 The ability to call the state laws to witness must be given prime importance, without being influenced solely by what is said by the incumbents. Zhabdrung Rimpochhe THE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY. CASE No CR
Terri Wood, OSB # Law Office of Terri Wood, P.C. 0 Van Buren Street Eugene, Oregon 0 1--1 Attorney for Defendant IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff,
More informationHINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION
2012 - HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Trial Overview 1 A. Governing Rules 1 B. Trial Basics 1 II. Opening Statements 2 A. Structure And Outline To Organize Your
More informationThe Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence
Vicki Voisin, ACP And Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. 2011 Vicki Voisin, Inc. and Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. All rights reserved. No part of this handout may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic
More informationThe scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: So it makes some sense to go straight to Rule 1101, even though it is
ALABAMA RULES OF EVIDENCE BACK TO THE BASICS The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: Rule 101. Scope. These rules govern proceedings in the courts of the State of Alabama to the
More informationCOMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)
COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) Rev. January 2015 This chart was prepared by Children s Law Center as a practice aid for attorneys representing children, parents, family
More informationRecanting Victims 7/19/2018. Goals of Presentation. Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial
Recanting Victims SIMONE HYLTON SENIOR ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY STONE MOUNTAIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Goals of Presentation Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial Give tools to use
More informationThe Admissibility of Child Hearsay Statements in Custody Litigation David Butler, Associate Circuit Judge
BRINGING CHILDREN S OUT-OF- COURT STATEMENTS INTO COURT: The Admissibility of Child Hearsay Statements in Custody Litigation David Butler, Associate Circuit Judge HEARSAY Ill. Rules of Evidence 801 Rule
More information) Cause No. 1:14-cv-937-WTL-DML. motions are fully briefed and the Court, being duly advised, resolves them as set forth below.
SCHEIDLER v. STATE OF INDIANA Doc. 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BRENDA LEAR SCHEIDLER, Plaintiff, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Defendant. Cause No. 1:14-cv-937-WTL-DML
More informationFORENSIC EXERCISE. JTIP Handout: Lesson 28 Hearsay. b. Is consistent with the declarant s WHAT IS HEARSAY?
FORENSIC EXERCISE WHAT IS HEARSAY? FRE Rule Notes/Examples 801(a) (c): Definition of Hearsay (a) A statement is an oral or written assertion or nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person
More informationMOCK TRIAL RULES. The Case 1) The case may contain any or all of the following stipulations: documents, narratives, exhibits, witness statements, etc.
MOCK TRIAL RULES The Case 1) The case may contain any or all of the following stipulations: documents, narratives, exhibits, witness statements, etc. 2) The stipulations (and fact statements, if any) may
More informationExamination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination. Penny J. White May 2015
Examination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination Penny J. White May 2015 I. Learning Objectives for this Session: Following this session, participants will be able to: 1. Exercise appropriate control
More informationArgumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge
Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge Asked and Answered Outside the Scope of Cross Examination
More informationI. Basic Concepts A. Overview of the Federal Rules of Evidence
I. Basic Concepts A. Overview of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1. Purposes of FRE- the federal rules of evidence are effective for any federal court in the US, rules were adopted to establish uniformity
More informationWhere did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).
INTRODUCTION: Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay). Courts deal with serious business. The law of evidence excludes
More informationI. Basic Concepts A. Overview of the Federal Rules of Evidence
I. Basic Concepts A. Overview of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1. Purposes of FRE- the federal rules of evidence are effective for any federal court in the US, rules were adopted to establish uniformity
More informationEVIDENCE ACT LAWS OF GRENADA REVISED EDITION CHAPTER 92. Amended by Act No. 7 of 1968 Act No. 12 of 1990 Act No. 9 of 1995 Act No.
LAWS OF GRENADA REVISED EDITION EVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 92 Amended by Act No. 7 of 1968 Act No. 12 of 1990 Act No. 9 of 1995 Act No. 26 of 2000 Printed and published with the authority of the Government of
More informationSUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)
SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION) The Supplement to the 2012 Edition of the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) is a complete revision of the Military
More informationA JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE. (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee. Senior Resident Superior Court Judge.
A JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee Senior Resident Superior Court Judge District 20B School for New Superior Court Judges January, 2009 The Exercise of Judicial
More informationPRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS AND SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS AND SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE FEDERAL RULE 801(D)(1)(A): THE COMPROMISE Stephen A. Saltzburg* INTRODUCTION Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) is a compromise. The Supreme Court
More informationLIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.
LIST OF CHAPTERS Chapter 1 PRETRIAL.............................................. 1 Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Chapter 2 MOTIONS IN LIMINE................................... 17 Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Chapter
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 13-1748 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. KYVANI OCASIO-RUIZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationTEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions
TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, 2016 ARTICLE I. Rule 101. Rule 102. Rule 103. Rule 104. Rule 105. Rule 106. Rule 107. ARTICLE II. Rule 201. Rule 202. Rule 203. Rule 204. ARTICLE III. Rule 301.
More informationImpeachment in Louisiana State Courts:
Impeachment in Louisiana State Courts: La. Code of Evidence Recognizes Eight Ways By Bobby M. Harges 252 To impeach or attack the credibility of a witness in Louisiana state courts, a party may examine
More informationCase 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
Case 1:17-cr-00350-KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 Post to docket. GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS 6/11/18 Hon. Katherine B. Forrest I. INTRODUCTION
More informationTRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005
TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005 Thomas K. Maher 312 W Franklin Street Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 (O) 929-1043 (H) 933-5674 TKMaher@tkmaherlaw.com General Instructions 1. General Information. The class will meet
More informationThe Most Common Foundations for Exhibits Francis J. Carney
The Most Common Foundations for Exhibits Francis J. Carney 1. Photographs a. Establish familiarity with scene depicted. b. Mark and show photo. c. Establish that the photo accurately depicts scene. Shiozawa
More informationPENOBSCOT COUNTY. Hearing was held on the defendant's motion to suppress and memoranda filed
STATE OF MAINE FILED & ENtERED SUPERIOR COURT PENOBSCOT, SS. SUPFR lor enl JRT LOCATION: BANGOR DOCKET NO CR-08-1206 AUG 03 2009 p., /. STATE OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY - i v. ORDER LISA GLEASON Hearing
More informationPrior Statements in Montana: Part I
The Alexander Blewett III School of Law The Scholarly Forum @ Montana Law Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings Faculty Publications 2013 Prior Statements in Montana: Part I Cynthia Ford Alexander
More information14. HEARSAY A. INTRODUCTION
14. HEARSAY A. INTRODUCTION 1. What is the Hearsay Rule? Hearsay is a statement that was made outside of the courtroom, asserts facts, and is now offered in court to prove the truth of the facts asserted.
More informationEvidence 101 A Primer on Evidence Law
Evidence 101 A Primer on Evidence Law By: Nancy Shapiro and David Silver, Koskie Minsky LLP 1 Table of Contents A. Introduction... 2 B. Relevance and Materiality 2 C. General Discretionary Power: Probative
More informationContents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...
Dedication... v About the Author... xvii Acknowledgments... xix Foreword... xxi Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources... xxvi Chapter 1 Trial Process and Procedure... 1 The Role of the Trial Judge
More informationThe Rules of Evidence as Applied by the Tax Court Joni Larson* Thomas M. Cooley Law School
The Rules of Evidence as Applied by the Tax Court Joni Larson* Thomas M. Cooley Law School The United States Tax Court applies the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules ) during its proceedings. 1 These
More informationTIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE
TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE by Curtis E. Shirley RELEVANCE Indiana Evidence Rule 401: Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the
More informationRule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney
Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney ATTACKING THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS The theory of attack by prior inconsistent statements is not based on the assumption
More informationCircuit Court for Baltimore County Case No.: 03-K UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2018
Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case No.: 03-K-17-005202 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 201 September Term, 2018 KHEVYN ARCELLE SHARP v. STATE OF MARYLAND Fader C.J., Leahy,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY. CASE No. 07-CR-0043
Terri Wood, OSB # Law Office of Terri Wood, P.C. 0 Van Buren Street Eugene, Oregon 0 1--1 Fax: 1-- Email: twood@callatg.com Attorney for Benjamin Jones IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE
More informationCharacter or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN
Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN Evid. R. 401 Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination
More informationObjections DEFINITIONS
Objections Objections are an attorney s way of formally notifying a judge that opposing counsel is not following the rules of evidence and requesting the judge to make a ruling on the issue. Objections
More informationEXPERT WITNESS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE EMPHASIS
EXPERT WITNESS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE EMPHASIS Allen Coleman David A. Dampier Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mississippi State University dampier@cse.msstate.edu Abstract Expert witness testimony
More informationMAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE
Last reviewed and edited December 15, 2011 Including amendments effective January 1, 2012 MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE TABLE OF RULES ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS RULE: 101. SCOPE. 102. PURPOSE AND CONSTRUCTION.
More informationI. GENERAL PROVISIONS FRE
EVIDENCE OUTLINE Why have federal rules of evidence? We want to 1) Reign in the parties in an adversary system; 2) We don t fully trust juries; 3) Time is short; 4) We want people to consult attorneys
More informationDIRECT EXAMINATION. Robert E. Harrington Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A.
DIRECT EXAMINATION Robert E. Harrington Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. John S. Leary Association of Black Lawyers Trial Advocacy CLE September 17, 2011 DIRECT EXAMINATION UNDERSTAND THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE
More informationProtecting the Child s Voice: Use and Application of the Child Victim Hearsay Exception
Protecting the Child s Voice: Use and Application of the Child Victim Hearsay Exception Presented by: Kelly A. Swartz, Director of Legal Advocacy, and Sara E. Goldfarb and Laura J. Lee, Senior Program
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, Beales and Senior Judge Coleman Argued at Richmond, Virginia JORGE LUIS REYES MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1660-05-2 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001121 15-MAY-2017 08:15 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RAYMOND S. DAVIS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
More informationReciprocal Immunity COLIN MILLER *
Reciprocal Immunity COLIN MILLER * A defendant is charged with using extortionate means to collect a loan. Two brothers give statements to the FBI. One brother s statement tends to incriminate the defendant.
More informationEVIDENCE. Professor Franks. Final Examination, Fall 2013 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
EVIDENCE Professor Franks Final Examination, Fall 2013 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. Carefully analyze the facts and grasp the issues in each question before beginning to write. Spend time reading the question
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD
STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In Re: Glenn Robinson, Esq. PRP File No. 2013-172 Disciplinary Counsel s Motion in Limine to Admit Statements by Pamela Binette Which Are Contained in
More information