UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON"

Transcription

1 Carl D. Crowell, OSB No P.O. Box 923 Salem, OR (503) Of attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC., and CELL FILM HOLDINGS, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, WILLIAM PATRICK SHELDON, Defendant, Case No.: 3:17-cv SB REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DECL. COUNSEL; EXHIBITS 1-6 FRCP 41(a)(2) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION There is only one relevant motion before the Court at this time, that being Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss. Ecf. 19. As per Defendant s opposition: Defendant does not oppose Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Ecf. 20, First sentence. With this the pending motion should be granted. The balance of Defendant s argument is filled with unsupported allegations, hyperbole and statements that are demonstratively false. Should Defendant actually seek further relief, it is properly brought under a separate motion. LR 7-1(b). REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 1 of 8

2 As per the concession of Defendant, and as argued in Plaintiff s Motion to Dismiss, and below, Plaintiff s Motion to Dismiss without prejudice should be granted. REPLY TO ALLEGATIONS As the allegations of Defendant s opposition go far beyond the scope of the motion, Plaintiffs reply to address some of the clear misstatements. Plaintiffs and their counsel have managed a number of cases in this district, balancing the burdens of discovery that may be imposed on third party subscribers and others in an effort to ensure that only properly liable parties are named in bittorrent copyright cases. In contrast to several cases in this District resulting in sanctioned parties who refuse to cooperate, in this case Plaintiffs encountered both a subscriber and then eventually a defendant that by and large cooperated, volunteered information, and assisted Plaintiffs. The subscriber identified the actual proper Defendant and avoided the need for compelled testimony. The parties cooperated and a resolution to address the persistent piracy was reached. Prior to appearance of Defense Counsel, the matter was resolved in all but final form, and in light of the cooperation of the parties and other factors Plaintiffs waived all costs, fees and damages. If the goal of this Court is for efficient investigation and resolution of bittorrent copyright infringement actions, facilitated by cooperative third parties (subscribers) and defendants, then up to the appearance of Defense Counsel this was a model case. On being appointed, and within minutes of the appointment, (Ecf. 7, 3/3/17, 10:17 am) the status of the settlement was shared with appointed counsel. Lake, Give me a call on this. I have agreed to dismiss this action if his computer is clean and he has agreed to have it reviewed by Robert Young. But if he simply agrees to stop, we will waive costs, fees and damages. * * * REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 2 of 8

3 Ecf. 23, Ex. 7; of 3/3/17, 10:51 AM Yet somehow Plaintiffs resolution with a cooperative subscriber and Defendant, who continued to reach out to Plaintiffs counsel to close the case even after appointment of counsel, quickly spiraled out of control with Defense Counsel demanding: we will stipulate to a dismissal of the case, with the payment of $4500 in attorney fees and $500 in costs Ecf. 23, Ec. 6, p. 4. This is not how a pro bono counsel should assist the court or a Defendant, and this should be noted. 1. Some of the unsupported allegations are intrinsically inconsistent. Much of the current status of this case is in a state of who said what. But in addition to a bizarre case of a settled matter cascading out of control with an overly zealous pro bono counsel, the Defendant s opposition contains a number of statements where the arguments go too far and wander into intrinsically inconsistent statements, such as at one point arguing, at no time did Mr. Crowell offer an outright dismissal. (P. 6) then later acknowledging, Mr. Crowell responded he would file a unilateral dismissal. (P. 7), and going back and forth about being authorized for $3,000 in costs. See p. 2, ( Oregon District Court allows for up to $3,000 in costs under such an appointment. ; Contra p. 7.) Such inconsistencies should color all the allegations of Defendant s opposition. 2. The declaration of Donna Violette is bizarrely false and inconsistent. Several of the statements of Violette are questionable, but it is demonstrably false that Plaintiffs or their Counsel ever threatened or even mentioned fines in the hundreds of thousands of dollars or possible prison time. Both letters mailed to Violette are submitted as Exhibits 1, REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 3 of 8

4 and 2. No economic demands were ever made on Violette and there is certainly no threat of prison. It is unknown why Ms. Violette went from being cooperative to fabricating such statements, but the Court cannot reasonably accept that such statements are plausible. After hundreds of cases in this District, and notable activity by the anti-copyright defense bar, should Plaintiffs counsel ever threaten criminal sanctions or prison time in a civil matter there is little doubt such improper communication would be immediately brought to the Court s attention, and such conduct certainly did not occur in this case. 3. Other occupants of the residence were reviewed in Plaintiffs investigation and all were eliminated with William Sheldon as the only plausible Defendant. Plaintiffs data showed consistent access from at least October 8, 2016, often at all hours of the day, through February 2017 when Violette canceled her service with ISP Comcast. An excerpt of the 67-page record of events is submitted as Exhibit 3. For each event there was the exact same Peer ID prefix observed (Client Peer ID Prefix 2D ), this being a code that an infringer uses to self-identify the particular software they are using. This indicates all the activity was by the same person using the same BitTorrent, version software to download and distribute content. Depending on which of Defendant s filed declarations are reviewed, and on which parts are considered, there were either five other people (Decl. Sheldon, Ecf. 22, 5), up to nine continuous residents (Decl. Violette, Ecf. 21, 2), or four other people (Decl. Violette, Ecf. 21, 5), or a total of six people on the premises. Decl. Violette, Ecf. 21, 14. Left out is that these numbers appear to include maintenance workers, temporary guests, and tenants that were REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 4 of 8

5 not continuously present as people moved in and out. In multiple phone calls with the subscriber and landlord Violette (identified as Violet by Comcast and then understood as Ziolette in phone calls), the times of tenancy of her renters, presence of guests, transient parties performing maintenance, and even ex-boyfriends, were all reviewed. It was confirmed that though there were other people that moved in and left, the only plausible party with consistent access from prior to November 1, 2016 and continuing into February 2017, and who was also present over Christmas (Ref. Exhibit 3, p (6-7) was William Sheldon. Without a doubt there were a number of parties with access to the password protected Wi-Fi service at the residence, but only one person was present persistently and continuously in a manner that matched the observed infringing activity as affirmed in the letter to Violette: We have reviewed your tenants and the times they were present (renting) at the residence with access to your internet service. The only tenant that was present from October 1, through the end of January that could plausibly be responsible for the observed activity is William Sheldon. You have further confirmed that the one other party that you thought might be responsible did not move in until November. As the activity started before his move-in and before he had access, he is reasonably eliminated. Exhibit 2, March 31 Letter to Ziolette (Violette). Further, on March 31, 2017, Violette called Plaintiffs counsel and reviewed that she had canceled her Comcast service in February, and was now a subscriber with CenturyLink (a/k/a Qwest). Decl. Counsel 7. She further checked her current IP address as assigned by CenturyLink and reported it as Id. When data for this IP address was reviewed, infringing activity by the same Client (Client Peer ID Prefix 2D ) was found. Decl. Counsel 10. In addition to the exact same Peer ID Prefix, one of the titles being distributed through the prior Comcast IP address, Shut.In p was still being actively distributed by the Defendant. Decl. Counsel 11. With this new Internet service, it was REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 5 of 8

6 reconfirmed that there was no one other than William Sheldon that could be responsible as now the infringer was apparently using the same software from before November 2016, and well into March 2017, distributing matching content. A record of the infringing activity observed though the second IP is submitted as Exhibit 4. With this repeated affirmation from Violette that only William Sheldon was present at all observed times, Plaintiffs sent Mr. Sheldon the letter of March 31, stating he was the only party that was present at all the times of the observed activity who might plausibly be responsible and stating, If you deny the allegations, or believe that our investigation is in error, please contact me promptly. Exhibit 5; Decl. Counsel 6. (The confirming letter to Violette on the same day submitted as Exhibit 2.) After two weeks of continuing activity and without a response, a First Amended Complaint was filed on April 15, Ecf. 5. Mr. Sheldon was then served on April 21, Exhibit 6 (Affidavit of Service). It should come as no surprise that the observed bittorrent activity finally stopped on Mr. Sheldon being personally served with Plaintiffs Complaint. Ref. Exhibit There was no dismissal to avoid Black Box discovery. Contrary to the inconsistent arguments in Defendant s motion, Plaintiffs did not move to dismiss to avoid discovery. The express offer was made: Plaintiffs are prepared to file a motion to dismiss this action with prejudice. But as I understand you wish to explore some of your theories and concerns about bittorrent litigation in general I am willing to agree to leave the case open and produce the documents as discussed today with Judge Beckerman and allow them to be reviewed for both your education and edification, as well as other members of the defense bar on an agreement that you will waive any claim for costs and fees. As I told the judge, I am fine with you exploring your theories, but this is not the case to do it. We will also agree to suspend all plaintiff s discovery giving you the opportunity to unilaterally REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 6 of 8

7 explore the documents and assuage your concerns about the legitimacy of plaintiffs' claims. Specifically I understand you want to look under the hood and see the data, and we will show it to you. But not at the expense of you then demanding costs and fees for your personal speculative exploration as we put off the dismissal. Further, should you find fraud in plaintiffs case I will agree that you can then petition for fees, setting aside the waiver of costs and fees, an offer I am confidant in making as there is no fraud. Ecf. 23, Exhibit 5. (Emphasis added) If there was anything improper to be discovered, Defendant was welcome to go on their fishing expedition. But with a Defense Counsel that was already demanding thousands of dollars for a case that was settled before their appointment, and threatening to run up further costs and fees, Plaintiffs were not willing to allow them to churn their bill for no purpose. Contrary to the claim that the case or controversy would be resolved, as per the offer, should any of the nefarious conduct Defendant alludes to be found, his Counsel would then be free to seek costs and fees. This is a case with a destitute Defendant who agreed to stop his conduct and Plaintiffs that waived costs, fees and damages in light of the subscriber s and eventually the Defendant s cooperation. But then appeared a Defense Counsel looking to churn massive costs and fees at the expense of their own client and other third parties, as discovery would have expanded to include Violette and every resident to some degree. Plaintiffs are not running away. Plaintiffs simply see no reason for a pyrrhic victory at the Defendant s expense to serve the desires of an over-zealous appointed counsel demanding fees and a payoff, looking for evidence that does not exist. /// REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 7 of 8

8 CONCLUSION What is clear in this action is that there was massive infringing activity. Plaintiffs took reasonable efforts to isolate a singular defendant eliminating all other parties with the early cooperation of a subscriber. Further, attempts to confer directly with the Defendant for any relevant information prior to naming him were refused. Finally, on being named, the Defendant cooperated and parties reached a resolution only to be discarded by appointed counsel who is seeking a payout for his disruption of an otherwise resolved case. Defendant s implied position is that in future cases even where subscribers and defendants cooperate, bittorrent plaintiffs must compel sworn testimony under oath, and forgo cooperation, and that naming a party should only take place after exhaustive and burdensome compelled discovery that is not easily refuted by subsequent inconsistent declarations. This is clearly contrary to the Federal Rules, the local rules and the general directives of the Courts of this District. WHEREFORE Plaintiffs maintain this matter is properly dismissed, without prejudice, as acknowledged by Defendant. DATED: June 26, Respectfully submitted, /s/ Carl D. Crowell Carl D. Crowell, OSB No carl@crowell-law.com Of attorneys for the Plaintiffs REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 8 of 8

9 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 3 Carl D. Crowell, OSB No carl@crowell-law.com P.O. Box 923 Salem, OR (503) Of attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC., and CELL FILM HOLDINGS, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, WILLIAM PATRICK SHELDON, Case No.: 3:17-cv SB DECLARATION OF COUNSEL IN SUPPORT OF REPLY / MOTION TO DISMISS; EXHIBITS 1-6 Defendant, Under penalty of perjury I, Carl D. Crowell, hereby state as follows: 1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in Oregon and Plaintiffs counsel in this matter. 2. All matters in this declaration are submitted through personal knowledge and belief. 3. Plaintiffs investigator Maverickeye has identified significant infringing activity originating from Internet protocol address ( IPA ) , including confirmed distributions of Plaintiffs motion picture Cell (2016) and Mechanic: Resurrection (2016) that persisted from at least October 8, 2016 through February 8, Excerpts of the 67 page record of activity is submitted as Exhibit In response to a subpoena, Comcast identified Donna Violet (now known to be Violette) at the subscriber. DECL. REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 1 of 3

10 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 3 5. Letters sent to Ms. Violette are submitted as Exhibits 1 and 2. At no time was a monetary demand made on Ms. Violette and certainly there has never been a threat of prison time or any criminal sanction. 6. In my several conversations with Ms. Violette she was very cooperative and we reviewed her tenants, guests, workmen that visited, and all parties that had access to her password protected Internet service. The only party that matched the data record of Exhibit 3 was William Sheldon as confirmed in my letter to Ms. Violette on March 31. Exhibit On March 31, Ms. Violette called and informed me that she had canceled her Comcast service in February of 2017 and was now with CenturyLink a/k/a Qwest. While on the phone I asked her to check her IP address, which can be done by simply typing, What is my IP in a basic Google search window. She reported her computer stated her IP address was, I confirmed that IPA was in fact a Qwest IPA and geo-located to her area and then ordered any record of bittorrent activity. 9. The record of infringing activity on IPA was continuing and is filed as a whole as Exhibit The record of infringing activity on IPA in March and April of 2017 shows the Peer ID prefix of 2D , indicating the infringer was using the BitTorrent, version software to download and distribute content. This is the same software used beginning at least as early as October 8, 2016 as shown on Exhibit The record of infringing activity on IPA in March and April of 2017 also included the distribution of the exact same torrent file Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AAC-ETRG with the HASH fingerprint of DECL. REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 2 of 3

11 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26 Filed 06/26/17 Page 3 of 3 7BDB CB46BD0CAC959E908D B. This means the same software at the same location was being used to distribute the exact same file observed though IPA in December, January and February, and then through IPA in March and April. 12. Ms. Violette and I reviewed the dates of observed activity of Exhibit 3 and 4 (through March 31) and she confirmed that though there were a number of people that had access over the prior six months, including workmen, guests and tenants that moved in in November and out prior to March 31, William Sheldon was the only match for all the dates and the activity. 13. Filed as Exhibit 5 is the letter sent to Mr. Sheldon on March 31, 2017 to which there was no response. 14. Filed as Exhibit 6 is the affidavit of service of Plaintiff s complaint, served April 21, On April 21, 2017 all bittorrent activity on IPA stopped in conjunction with Mr. Sheldon being personally served. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. DATED: June 26, /s/ Carl D. Crowell Carl D. Crowell, OSB No carl@crowell-law.com P.O. Box 923 Salem, OR (503) Of counsel for Plaintiffs DECL. REPLY: MOTION TO DISMISS Page 3 of 3

12 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT Liberty Street SE - P.O. Box 923 Salem, Oregon Tel: Sunday, March 19, 2017 Donna Voilet 3903 SW Baird St Portland, OR RE: Infringement of: Civil Action No.: IP Address / Defendant: Mechanic: Resurrection 3:17-cv Federal Court District of Oregon Doe Dear Ms. Voilet: Crowell Law has filed an infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon on behalf of our client Cell Film Holdings, for infringement, download and distribution of the motion picture, Mechanic: Resurrection. Comcast has identified you as responsible for an Internet Protocol ( IP ) address at a time this IP address was being used to distribute our client s motion picture. We have evidence that someone at that address using your Internet service has placed a media file which contains the protected film content for our client s motion picture in a shared folder location enabling others to download copies of this content. Through a direct connection to the infringing computer we have also obtained the file name used, specifics related to the software used, the file size and additional metadata, all corresponding to the IP address assigned to you at the time the infringing activity occurred. We invite your voluntary cooperation in assisting us with this matter. With the observed activity associated with your IP address, this type of material is likely tied to a single person at the address who was a permissive user and contains material not likely to be viewed by young children. I will request your further assistance in identifying the infringer and responsible party. Please contact me as soon as possible to discuss how we might proceed. I would like to avoid burdensome interference and your cooperation will facilitate the identification of the party that exploited your Internet service to violate my clients rights. We strongly encourage you to consult with an attorney to review your rights in connection with this matter. Enclosed is a copy of Standing Order which includes additional information about this case and information on an attorney referral service through the Oregon State Bar and how to apply for Pro Bono counsel through the District Court. 3/19/17

13 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT 1 As stated in the enclosed order (Standing Order ): C. Notwithstanding contrary information available through the Internet, if a subscriber or defendant ignores a Court Order, a subpoena seeking the subscriber's deposition, or a Summons and Complaint, then plaintiff may ask the Court for relief, including an award of attorney fees, and possibly the entry of a default judgment for money damages. D. Accordingly, it is important that subscribers and defendants seek proper legal advice concerning their rights and obligations. If you obtain an attorney, please have them contact me. If you have further questions, you may contact me at or carl@crowell-law.com. We thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter and we look forward to resolving our client s claim with the infringing party in an amicable fashion. Sincerely, Carl D. Crowell carl@crowell-law.com encl. Standing Order Liberty Street SE - P.O. Box 923 Salem, Oregon /19/17 Page 2 of 2

14 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-2 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of Liberty Street SE - P.O. Box 923 Salem, Oregon Tel: Friday, March 31, 2017 Donna Ziolette 3903 SW Baird St Portland, OR RE: Infringement of: Civil Action No.: IP Address / Defendant: Mechanic: Resurrection 3:17-cv Federal Court District of Oregon Doe Dear Ms. Ziolette: Thank you for speaking to me and assisting us with this investigation. As per our phone calls, I understand you are not involved with this infringing activity, but you do have a number of renters that as a part of their tennency are given access to your internet service. We have reviewed your tenants and the times they were present (renting) at the residence with access to your intenrnet service. The only tenant that was present from October 1, through the end of Janaury that could plauably be responsible for the observed activity is William Sheldon. You have further comnfirmed that the one other party that you thought might be responsible did not move in until November. As the activity started before his move-in and before he had access, he is reasonably eliminiated. Please pass on a copy of the Standing Order to Mr. Sheldon. I will be wriring him seperatly, but he is free to obtain an attorney now. Sincerely, Carl D. Crowell carl@crowell-law.com 3/31/17 EXHIBIT 2

15 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-3 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 9 - Comcast Account - No.$ IP Peer$ID Torrent$Name Date$&$Time$(UTC) D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/7/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/7/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/7/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/7/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$8: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$9: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$15: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$19: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/8/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$9: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$9: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$17:52 EXHIBIT 3 Page 1 of 67

16 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-3 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 9 - Comcast Account D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$19: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/9/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/10/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/10/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/10/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/10/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/10/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/10/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$15: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$15: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$19: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/11/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/12/16$4:33 EXHIBIT 3 Page 2 of 67

17 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-3 Filed 06/26/17 Page 3 of 9 - Comcast Account D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/27/16$19: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/28/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/28/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/28/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/29/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$8: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/30/16$8:39 EXHIBIT 3 Page 7 of 67

18 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-3 Filed 06/26/17 Page 4 of 9 - Comcast Account D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 10/31/16$8: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$15: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/1/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/2/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$8: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$8: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$9: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/3/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$15: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 11/4/16$21:13 EXHIBIT 3 Page 8 of 67

19 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-3 Filed 06/26/17 Page 5 of 9 - Comcast Account D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/23/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/23/16$23: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/23/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$0: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$1: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$1: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$2: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$2: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$3: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$4: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$5: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$6: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$6: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$7: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$7: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$7: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$8: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$8: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$8: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$9: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$9: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$9: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$10: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$10: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$11: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$11: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$11: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$12: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$15:47 EXHIBIT 3 Page 26 of 67

20 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-3 Filed 06/26/17 Page 6 of 9 - Comcast Account D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$15: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$17: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$18: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$19: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$19: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$19: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$20: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$20: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/24/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$21: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$22: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$23: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/24/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/24/16$23: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$12: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$13: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$13: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$14: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$14: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$15: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$15: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/25/16$16: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$16: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$16: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$16: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$17: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/25/16$17: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$17: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$17: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$18: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$18: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$19: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$19: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/25/16$19:49 EXHIBIT 3 Page 27 of 67

21 Case 3:17-cv SB Document 26-3 Filed 06/26/17 Page 7 of 9 - Comcast Account D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$20: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$20: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/25/16$20: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$21: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$21: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$21: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/25/16$21: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/25/16$21: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$22: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$22: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$22: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/25/16$23: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/25/16$23: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$23: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/25/16$23: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$0: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$0: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$0: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$1: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$1: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$1: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/26/16$1: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/26/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$2: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$2: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$3: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/26/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$3: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$3: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$4: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/26/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$4: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$4: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$5: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$5: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$5: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/26/16$6: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$6: D Cell.2016.HDRip.XViDGETRG 12/26/16$6: D Shut.In p.BRRip.x264.AACGETRG 12/26/16$6: D Mechanic$Resurrection$(2016)$720p$BrRip$x264 12/26/16$6:46 EXHIBIT 3 Page 28 of 67

2:13-cv VAR-RSW Doc # 32 Filed 11/20/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 586 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

2:13-cv VAR-RSW Doc # 32 Filed 11/20/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 586 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 2:13-cv-12217-VAR-RSW Doc # 32 Filed 11/20/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 586 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 2:13-cv-12217-VAR-RSW v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION Case Document 54 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 6 David H. Madden Mersenne Law 9600 S.W. Oak Street Suite 500 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503679-1671 ecf@mersenne.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

More information

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7 Case :-cv-0-wha Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Henrik Mosesi, Esq. (SBN: ) Anthony Lupu, Esq. (SBN ) Pillar Law Group APLC 0 S. Rodeo Drive, Suite 0 Beverly Hills, CA 0 Tel.: 0--0000 Fax: -- Henrik@Pillar.law

More information

Case 2:16-cv RSM Document 60 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 8 Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez

Case 2:16-cv RSM Document 60 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 8 Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez Case 2:16-cv-00551-RSM Document 60 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 8 Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff, DECLARATION

More information

Case 2:17-cv DB-DBP Document 65 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 2:17-cv DB-DBP Document 65 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH Case 2:17-cv-00550-DB-DBP Document 65 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Plaintiff, Darren Brinkley, Case No. 2:17-cv-00550

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION Case Document 38 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 13 David H. Madden Mersenne Law 9600 S.W. Oak Street Suite 500 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503679-1671 ecf@mersenne.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

More information

Case 3:15-cv BTM-BLM Document 6 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:15-cv BTM-BLM Document 6 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 7 Case :-cv-0-btm-blm Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, v. Plaintiff, JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address..., Defendant. Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. Case :-cv-0-dms-mdd Document Filed 0 Page of 0 0 DOE -..., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL PRODUCTIONS, INC., Case No.: -cv-0-dms-mdd Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; BMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC.,

More information

Case 2:14-cv JLL-JAD Document 16 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 151

Case 2:14-cv JLL-JAD Document 16 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 151 Case 2:14-cv-06976-JLL-JAD Document 16 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 151 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MALIBU MEDIA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-6976 (JLL)

More information

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Part V. When it is concerning matters of law, go first to the specific then to the general

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Part V. When it is concerning matters of law, go first to the specific then to the general Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Part V When it is concerning matters of law, go first to the specific then to the general On Eviction Cases, Go First To 510 Series of Rules Then to the 500 thru 507 Series

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendant. Case :-cv-00-cab-ksc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 0..0., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, Defendant.

More information

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013]

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013] TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013] RULE 500. GENERAL RULES RULE 500.1. CONSTRUCTION OF RULES Unless otherwise

More information

PROCEDURE TO FILE AN EVICTION

PROCEDURE TO FILE AN EVICTION PROCEDURE TO FILE AN EVICTION FILING FEE: $185.00 SUMMONS: $10.00 SHERIFF S FEE TO SUMMONS: $40.00 Per Tenant (Sheriff will only accept cash, money order or a business check) 1. A 3 Day Notice to Vacate

More information

Case 1:17-cv WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:17-cv-02280-WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-02280-WYD-MEH ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-cab-mdd Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, JOHN DOE..., Defendant. Case No.: -cv-0-cab-mdd ORDER DENYING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 14-cv Hon. George Caram Steeh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 14-cv Hon. George Caram Steeh 2:14-cv-12409-GCS-MKM Doc # 23 Filed 03/02/15 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 348 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION vs. MICHAEL BRAUN, Case No.

More information

Case 1:12-cv JMF Document 6 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 10. : : Plaintiff, : : Defendants.

Case 1:12-cv JMF Document 6 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 10. : : Plaintiff, : : Defendants. Case 112-cv-03873-JMF Document 6 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X DIGITAL SIN,

More information

Case 3:15-cv SB Document 56 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:15-cv SB Document 56 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Case 3:15-cv-01550-SB Document 56 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON COBBLER NEVADA, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-01550-SB Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 16-9122 FINAL APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AND OF A FORM STATEMENT OF INABILITY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-raj Document Filed 0// Page of HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 0 DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC, v. DOES -, ORDER Plaintiff, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT

More information

LOCAL RULES OF PROCEDURE AND RULES OF DECORUM FOR THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURTS GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS

LOCAL RULES OF PROCEDURE AND RULES OF DECORUM FOR THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURTS GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS LOCAL RULES OF PROCEDURE AND RULES OF DECORUM FOR THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURTS GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS REVISED 10/28/2016 GENERAL 1.1 Objective. These rules are promulgated to provide a uniform system

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:19-cv-582-T-36AEP ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:19-cv-582-T-36AEP ORDER Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, a limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:19-cv-582-T-36AEP

More information

United States District Court

United States District Court Case:-cv-00-PJH Document Filed0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 AF HOLDINGS LLC, Plaintiff, No. C -0 PJH v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

More information

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 04/26/18 page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 04/26/18 page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv-00160-JVB-JEM document 1 filed 04/26/18 page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION VENICE, P.I., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CAUSE NO. 2:17-CV-285-JVB-JEM

More information

When It Is Concerning Matters Of Law. Go First To The Specific. Then To The General

When It Is Concerning Matters Of Law. Go First To The Specific. Then To The General To all who might be interested: New Rules for the J.P. Courts have been adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas, effective August 31, 2013. When It Is Concerning Matters Of Law Go First To The Specific Then

More information

Unless otherwise expressly provided, in Part V of these Rules of Civil Procedure:

Unless otherwise expressly provided, in Part V of these Rules of Civil Procedure: 'TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013) RULE 500.1. CONSTRUCTION OF RULES RULE 500. GENERAL RULES Unless otherwise

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ben-mdd Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, JOHN DOE -..., Defendant. Case No.: -cv--mma-mdd ORDER DENYING

More information

Case 1:10-cv BAH Document 89 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv BAH Document 89 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:10-cv-00873-BAH Document 89 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CALL OF THE WILD MOVIE, LLC v. CA. 1:10-cv-00455-BAH DOES 1 1,062 MAVERICK ENTERTAINMENT

More information

Case 3:16-cv JSC Document 30-1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION

Case 3:16-cv JSC Document 30-1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION Case 3:16-cv-01164-JSC Document 30-1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 18 James S. Davis CALBAR NO.207963 Email: Jamesdee3080@msn.com James S. Davis Attorney at Law 730 Broadway, Suite 102 Chula Vista CA 91910

More information

Case 8:13-cv JSM-TBM Document 53 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1057 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:13-cv JSM-TBM Document 53 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1057 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:13-cv-03007-JSM-TBM Document 53 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1057 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 8:13-cv-03007-JSM-TBM

More information

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard

More information

H. R. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OCTOBER 4, 2017

H. R. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OCTOBER 4, 2017 115TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. To amend title 17, United States Code, to establish an alternative dispute resolution program for copyright small claims, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 13-55881 06/17/2013 ID: 8669253 DktEntry: 10-1 Page: 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INGENUITY 13 LLC Plaintiff and PRENDA LAW, INC., Ninth Circuit Case No. 13-55881 [Related

More information

Case 3:16-cv WHA Document 29-1 Filed 08/25/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-cv WHA Document 29-1 Filed 08/25/16 Page 1 of 5 Case :-cv-000-wha Document - Filed 0// Page of Brian Heit (SBN: 0) HEIT LAW GROUP, PC Townsgate Road, Suite 0 Westlake Village, CA [phone]: (). Brian.Heit@HElaw.attorney Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIV. NO. S KJM CKD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIV. NO. S KJM CKD HARD DRIVE PRODUCTIONS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, CIV. NO. S--0 KJM CKD vs. JOHN DOE, Defendant. ORDER 0 / Presently before the court is

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. EFFECTIVE DATE Electronic filing is mandatory,

More information

If a response is filed, a hearing will be scheduled. Notification of the hearing date will be mailed to both parties.

If a response is filed, a hearing will be scheduled. Notification of the hearing date will be mailed to both parties. TENANT EVICTION PACKAGE FOR NON-PAYMENT OF RENT ONLY (THIS PACKAGE DOES NOT APPLY TO COMMERCIAL PROPERTY NOR MOBILE HOME PARKS, NOR CLAIMS OF MORE THAN $15,000.00) Form #1 Three Day Notice Complete the

More information

2:12-cv DPH-MJH Doc # 63 Filed 05/30/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1692 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:12-cv DPH-MJH Doc # 63 Filed 05/30/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1692 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:12-cv-13312-DPH-MJH Doc # 63 Filed 05/30/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1692 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, a California limited liability company,

More information

Case 2:13-cv LFR Document 24 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:13-cv LFR Document 24 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:13-cv-05486-LFR Document 24 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN' DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Civil Action No. 13-cv-5486 Malibu Media, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Defendant

More information

Case 8:14-cv JDW-EAJ Document 10 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:14-cv JDW-EAJ Document 10 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:14-cv-02132-JDW-EAJ Document 10 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN JOHNSON, Defendant.

More information

Case 1:12-cv HB Document 7 Filed 06/12/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:12-cv HB Document 7 Filed 06/12/12 Page 1 of 6 Case 112-cv-02962-HB Document 7 Filed 06/12/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X PATRICK COLLINS, INC.,

More information

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution

More information

$2.50 COMPLAINT FOR UNLAWFUL DETAINER

$2.50 COMPLAINT FOR UNLAWFUL DETAINER $2.50 COMPLAINT FOR UNLAWFUL DETAINER When should this form be used? Unlawful Detainer is used to remove a person or persons who occupy your real property, but do not hold title to that property. The property

More information

Case 1:13-cv WYD-MEH Document 29 Filed 02/26/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv WYD-MEH Document 29 Filed 02/26/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:13-cv-02385-WYD-MEH Document 29 Filed 02/26/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.: 1:13-cv-02385-WYD-MEH MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,

More information

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 Case 3:14-cv-00886-AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 Kevin M. Hayes, OSB #012801 Email: kevin.hayes@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Case :-cv-0-jls-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address..., Defendant. Case

More information

Lowndes County Magistrate Court

Lowndes County Magistrate Court Lowndes County Magistrate Court Legal Terms Glossary Action: Affiant: Affidavit: Affirmation: Agent for Landlord: Answer: Appeals: Bail: A court proceding when one party prosecutes another for the protection

More information

Case 3:10-cv JPB -JES Document 66 Filed 12/16/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1001

Case 3:10-cv JPB -JES Document 66 Filed 12/16/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1001 Case 3:10-cv-00090-JPB -JES Document 66 Filed 12/16/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1001 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG THIRD WORLD MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MARY CUMMINS Plaintiff W. th St. #1- Los Angeles, CA 001 In Pro Per Telephone: ( -0 Email: mmmaryinla@aol.com MARY CUMMINS Plaintiff v. AMANDA LOLLAR aka BAT WORLD SANCTUARY an individual

More information

Case 2:16-cv APG-GWF Document 3 Filed 04/24/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:16-cv APG-GWF Document 3 Filed 04/24/16 Page 1 of 7 Case :-cv-00-apg-gwf Document Filed 0// Page of CHARLES C. RAINEY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 chaz@raineylegal.com RAINEY LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 0 W. Martin Avenue, Second Floor Las Vegas, Nevada +.0..00 (ph +...

More information

CASE 0:12-cv JNE-FLN Document 9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:12-cv JNE-FLN Document 9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:12-cv-01448-JNE-FLN Document 9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 6 AF Holdings LLC, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. Civil No. 12-1448 (JNE/FLN) ORDER John Doe, Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-00-tor ECF No. filed // PageID. Page of J. CHRISTOPHER LYNCH, WSBA # 0 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 00 Spokane, WA Phone: (0) - Fax: (0) - Attorney for Defendant Ryan Lamberson 0 UNITED STATES

More information

FORM INTERROGATORIES UNLAWFUL DETAINER

FORM INTERROGATORIES UNLAWFUL DETAINER ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name and Address): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): NAME OF COURT AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT AND BRANCH COURT, IF ANY: TEL. NO.: UNLAWFUL DETAINER ASSISTANT (Check one box): An unlawful

More information

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 31 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 31 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case :-cv-0-wha Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Brenna E. Erlbaum (SBN: 0 HEIT ERLBAUM, LLP 0-I South Reino Rd # Newbury Park, CA 0 [phone]: (0. Brenna.Erlbaum@HElaw.attorney Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. Henry v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION JOHNNY ISHMEL HENRY PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:09CV99-KS-MTP

More information

Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions

Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions RUBY J. KRAJICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W W W.NYSD.USCOURTS.GOV C L E R K O F C O U R T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 500 PEARL STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10007 300 QUARROPAS STREET, W HITE PLAINS, NY 10601

More information

JUSTICE COURT CIVIL SUITS-SMALL CLAIMS CASE

JUSTICE COURT CIVIL SUITS-SMALL CLAIMS CASE JUSTICE COURT CIVIL SUITS-SMALL CLAIMS CASE Justice Courts Pct 2 & 4 of Midland County, Texas 707 West Washington Midland, Texas 79701 www.co.midland.tx.us Honorable David M. Cobos Justice of the Peace,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SMALL CLAIMS

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SMALL CLAIMS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SMALL CLAIMS Our forms are designed to address the most common claims, but are not specifically designed for a specific case. Neither the Judge nor our staff is allowed to give

More information

Case ID: Control No.:

Case ID: Control No.: By: A. Jordan Rushie Jordan@FishtownLaw.com Pa. Id. 209066 Mulvihill & Rushie LLC 2424 East York Street Suite 316 Philadelphia, PA 19125 215.385.5291 Attorneys for Plaintiff In the Court of Common Pleas

More information

LIMITED JURISDICTION

LIMITED JURISDICTION Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa LIMITED JURISDICTION Civil Actions PACKET What you will find in this packet: Notice To Plaintiffs (CV-659a-INFO) Notice To Defendants (CV-659b-INFO)

More information

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 475 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : DISPUTE RESOLUTION PART 475 CONTESTED CASES AND OTHER FORMAL HEARINGS

More information

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding

More information

/ o i ' "" Plaintiff, ) ) MOTION TO COMPEL vs. )

/ o i '  Plaintiff, ) ) MOTION TO COMPEL vs. ) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF HAYWOOD MCLEAN LAW FIRM, P.A., ) ' "" IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE r / o i j DTSIRICT COURT DIVISION FILE NO: 18CVD345 LISA A. KOSIR, Plaintiff, ) ) MOTION TO COMPEL

More information

Civil Litigation Forms Library

Civil Litigation Forms Library Civil Litigation Forms Library Notice of Circumstances Giving Rise to Claim and Claim Against Governmental Subdivision, Its Officers, Employees, or Agents Notice of Claim Against State Officer, Employee,

More information

Case 1:11-cv JDB-JMF Document 8 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv JDB-JMF Document 8 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:11-cv-01962-JDB-JMF Document 8 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 6 SBO PICTURES, INC., Plaintiff, DOES 1-87, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. Civil Action No. 11-1962

More information

FEE ARBITRATION PROGRAM

FEE ARBITRATION PROGRAM Please read carefully before filling out the form: The Oregon State Bar s Fee Arbitration Program is voluntary, not mandatory. The program is designed to resolving disputes over fees between: An Oregon

More information

District of Columbia False Claims Act

District of Columbia False Claims Act District of Columbia False Claims Act 2-308.03. Claims by District government against contractor (a) (1) All claims by the District government against a contractor arising under or relating to a contract

More information

Termination of Guardianship Minor. Forms and Procedures. For Wyoming MOVANT

Termination of Guardianship Minor. Forms and Procedures. For Wyoming MOVANT Packet 16 Termination of Guardianship Minor Forms and Procedures For Wyoming MOVANT Published by Wyoming Supreme Court 2301 Capitol Avenue Supreme Court Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 Termination of Guardianship

More information

Case 2:12-cv GMS Document 21 Filed 11/28/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv GMS Document 21 Filed 11/28/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0-gms Document Filed // Page of 0 0 David Harris E. Caballero ST Number One Mesa, AZ 0 (0 - troll.assassins@cyber-wizard.com Defendant Pro Se AF Holdings, LLC vs. David Harris Plaintiff, IN THE

More information

FILING AN EVICTION LAWSUIT

FILING AN EVICTION LAWSUIT FILING AN EVICTION LAWSUIT VENUE: Suit for possession of property, precinct in which all or part of the property is located. Suit for rent in which all or part of the property is located. REQUIITES: If

More information

BIRTH CERTIFICATE AMENDMENT

BIRTH CERTIFICATE AMENDMENT BIRTH CERTIFICATE AMENDMENT IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS PACKET Petitioner : The first and last name of the person who is filing this action This petition must be supported with evidence, including the enclosed

More information

EVICTION SUIT. Justice Court Pct. 2 & 4 of Midland Country, Texas 707 W. Washington Midland, Texas

EVICTION SUIT. Justice Court Pct. 2 & 4 of Midland Country, Texas 707 W. Washington Midland, Texas EVICTION SUIT Honorable David M. Cobos Justice of the Peace, Pct. 2 (432) 688-4735 Justice Court Pct. 2 & 4 of Midland Country, Texas 707 W. Washington Midland, Texas 79701 www.co.midland.tx.us Honorable

More information

Case 1:12-cv CMH-TRJ Document 11 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 219

Case 1:12-cv CMH-TRJ Document 11 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 219 Case 1:12-cv-00161-CMH-TRJ Document 11 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 219 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.

More information

D Statement of Responsibility D Permission to Use D Consent to Case Closure After 90 Days of Inactivity

D Statement of Responsibility D Permission to Use  D Consent to Case Closure After 90 Days of Inactivity Eviction Checklist ATTENTION: ALL PROPERTY MANAGERS- The Court now requires that you submit written authorization from your clients for each new eviction filed. I. TO FILE A COMPLAINT FOR EVICTION FORM:

More information

D Statement of Responsibility. D l Original plus 4 copies of Complaint. D $7 for clerk to prepare Writ

D Statement of Responsibility. D l Original plus 4 copies of Complaint. D $7 for clerk to prepare Writ Eviction Checklist ATTENTION: ALL PROPERTY MANAGERS- The Court now requires that you submit written authorization from your clients for each new eviction filed. I. TO FILE A COMPLAINT FOR EVICTION FORM:

More information

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule LOCAL RULES FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FAMILY COURT, DOMESTIC, CIVIL AND GENERAL RULES NEW HANOVER AND PENDER COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District

More information

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 13985 STOWE DRIVE POWAY, CA 92064 TEL: (858) 513-1020 FAX: (858) 513-1002 www.lorberlaw.com May 6, 2016 Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield jgreenfield@lorberlaw.com Zachariah R. Tomlin

More information

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 19 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 19 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:10-cv-00455-RMU Document 19 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CALL OF THE WILD MOVIE, LLC Plaintiff, v. CA. 1:10-cv-00455-RMU DOES 1 1,062 Defendants.

More information

CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011

CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011 CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011 I. Initial steps A. CARPLS Screening. Every new case is screened by CARPLS at the Municipal Court Advice Desk. Located

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS The information contained in this packet is not offered as legal advice. The information is not exhaustive. There may be other remedies and procedures not contained in these packets. You should seek professional,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 MARY CUMMINS Plaintiff W. th St. #0- Los Angeles, CA 001 In Pro Per Telephone: ( -0 Email: mmmaryinla@aol.com MARY CUMMINS Plaintiff v. AMANDA LOLLAR aka BAT WORLD SANCTUARY an individual

More information

CHAPTER 38: CODE ENFORCEMENT

CHAPTER 38: CODE ENFORCEMENT 3-35 CHAPTER 38: CODE ENFORCEMENT Section General Provisions 38.01 Establishment and purpose 38.02 Definitions Enforcement Procedure 38.05 Initiation of enforcement action 38.06 Administrative procedures

More information

IC Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings

IC Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings IC 4-21.5-3 Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings IC 4-21.5-3-1 Service of process; notice by publication Sec. 1. (a) This section applies to: (1) the giving of any notice; (2) the service of any motion,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff(s), CASE NO.: v. DIVISION:. Defendant(s). / UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CAUSE FOR TRIAL AND

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH PLAINTIFFS V. NO. 1:06cv1080-LTS-RHW STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, FORENSIC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case :-cv-00-mmm-agr Document - Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP LARRY W. MCFARLAND (State Bar No. ) LMcFarland@kilpatricktownsend.com DENNIS L. WILSON (State Bar No.

More information

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers

More information

DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT

DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT [If the default judgment comes from Small Claims Court, go to that court and ask the small claims clerk for information

More information

Case 2:12-md AB Document Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

Case 2:12-md AB Document Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER Case 2:12-md-02323-AB Document 10294 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS' CONCUSSION INJURY LITIGATION

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES Rule Effective Chapter 1. Civil Cases over $25,000 300. Renumbered as Rule 359 07/01/09 301. Classification 07/01/09 302. Renumbered as Rule 361 07/01/09 303. All-Purpose Assignment

More information

Case 3:11-cv BEN-MDD Document 20 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:11-cv BEN-MDD Document 20 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 8 Case :-cv-0-ben-mdd Document Filed 0// Page of Dolores Contreras, SBN 0 BOYD CONTRERAS, LLP 0 West Broadway, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 T. ( - F. ( - Email: dc@boydcontreras.com Attorney for Jane Doe. EX

More information

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES CAUSE NO. ' IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, ' ' V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT ' ' Defendant. ' OF COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT S INTERROGATORIES TO PLANTIFF TO: PLAINTIFF,, by service

More information

Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client

Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client Chapter 17 Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client R ecipients of an approved VAWA petition are also granted deferred action status for a period of fifteen months. Under this status

More information

11/16/2017 1:46 PM 17CV10996

11/16/2017 1:46 PM 17CV10996 //0 : PM CV0 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF TILLAMOOK 0 WILLIAM B. WALTON, an individual, JAMES JEFFERSON WALTON, JR, an individual, and VICTORIA K. WALTON, an individual,

More information

EVICTION CASE INSTRUCTIONS

EVICTION CASE INSTRUCTIONS EVICTION CASE INSTRUCTIONS There are generally four types of Landlord/Tenant issues that present themselves in justice court: 1) Evictions (see eviction section below as well as Texas Property Code, Chapter

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case 1:06-cv-03958 Document 26-1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability

More information

CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client

CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client R eceipts of an approved VAWA petition are also granted deferred action: status for a period of fifteen months. Under this status

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON GEORGE A. RIEMER Petitioner, v- Petition for Judicial Review STATE OF OREGON, OREGON GOVERNOR JOHN KITZHABER, OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL ELLEN ROSENBLUM, and OREGON

More information