Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1"

Transcription

1 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 Kevin M. Hayes, OSB # kevin.hayes@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Civil No. 0:14-cv v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE, an Oregon Corporation, and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN, a Washington Corporation, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendants.

2 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 2 of 14 Page ID#: 2 Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture, Inc., doing business as Mackenzie Architecture, through its attorneys, complains of Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. s, ( Mackenzie Engineering use of the mark MACKENZIE and Defendant Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design ( Group Mackenzie use and registration of the mark MACKENZIE (collectively Defendants, and alleges as follows, upon knowledge with respect to itself and its own acts, and upon information and belief as to all other matters: I. THE MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE MARK AND THE NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Mackenzie Architecture owns the mark MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE and has been using the mark for at least nearly a decade for its architecture services. 2. Before Mackenzie Architecture adopted its MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE mark, it used other marks comprising MACKENZIE. 3. Until recently, Defendant, Mackenzie Engineering used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for its engineering services, which also included, in some cases, architecture services. It is believed that Defendant Group Mackenzie also used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for its engineering services, which also included, in some cases, architecture services. It is unclear which of Defendants actually own the mark GROUP MACKENZIE as Mackenzie Engineering has stated that the mark is its mark, but Group Mackenzie is the listed owner of the trademark registration that was for GROUP MACKENZIE and has been improperly amended to MACKENZIE alone (Reg. No It is believed that Mackenzie Engineering and Group Mackenzie are related entities acting in concert with each other. Page 1

3 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 3 of 14 Page ID#: 3 4. It is believed that one or both of Defendants used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for their services from around sometime around 1996 until about August In that time period, it is believed that Plaintiff and Defendants were able to coexist using their respective marks, MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE and GROUP MACKENZIE. 6. But then, around August 2013, Defendants dropped GROUP from the mark GROUP MACKENZIE and began operating under the mark MACKENZIE alone. 7. Defendants change to simply MACKENZIE usurps rights in all MACKENZIE formative marks and confuses consumers into mistakenly believing that Defendants and Plaintiff are associated, or that one is infringing the other. 8. Making the situation even worse in this case, Defendant Mackenzie Engineering also uses the Internet search heading for its website Mackenzie Architecture, which is of course, Plaintiff s mark. 9. Plaintiff brings this suit to stop Defendants from causing confusion with Plaintiff s MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE mark. II. THE PARTIES 10. Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture Inc. is an Oregon corporation operating in the state of Oregon with its principal place of business in Portland, Oregon. Plaintiff is located and does business within this judicial district. 11. Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. is an Oregon corporation operating in the state of Oregon with its principal place of business in Portland, Oregon. Defendant is located and does business within this judicial district. Page 2

4 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 4 of 14 Page ID#: Defendant Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design s Trademark Registration No states that Group Mackenzie is a Washington Corporation. Thus, it is believed that it is a Washington Corporation. Group Mackenzie s principal place of business is believed to be in Portland, Oregon, as Trademark Registration No states that the address for Group Mackenzie is in Portland, Oregon. Defendant is located and does business within this judicial district. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 13. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action because this action arises under the Federal Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C , jurisdiction being conferred in accordance with 15 U.S.C and 28 U.S.C and Supplemental jurisdiction over the causes of action under Oregon state law is proper as those causes of action are substantially related to the causes of action over which the Court has original jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1338(b and Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b in that Defendants are transacting business within this judicial district and have committed acts complained of herein in this judicial district (or those acts have been aimed at and felt within this judicial district. IV. THE FACTS 14. Plaintiff has used the mark and been known as MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE for architectural services since at least as early as Plaintiff s owner s (Hilary Mackenzie father, Tom Mackenzie, was a founder of Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. in the 1960 s. On information and belief, Defendants were aware of Plaintiff s use of MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE since at least 2005 and other MACKENZIE formative marks since at least the 1990s. Page 3

5 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 5 of 14 Page ID#: Defendants did not begin use of the mark MACKENZIE alone until about August Before that time, Defendants did not use the mark MACKENZIE alone for their services. Instead, Defendants used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for their services. 17. Defendants did not begin use of Mackenzie Architecture, shown below in Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. s Internet search heading until sometime in or after August Defendants use an Internet search heading comprising Mackenzie Architecture in connection with offering architecture services to third parties. 19. Defendants use the mark MACKENZIE alone in connection with offering architecture services to third parties. Page 4

6 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 6 of 14 Page ID#: Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. has taken telephone calls for Mackenzie Architecture and answered affirmatively that it was Mackenzie Architecture when asked. Defendant has then transferred the callers to employees in its architectural services department. A person in Defendant s employ has also admitted that Defendant s change to use of MACKENZIE alone for architecture services could cause confusion with MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE. 21. Defendant Group Mackenzie is listed as the owner of federal trademark registration no. 2,091,275, which was initially for the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for architectural services; engineering services in the fields of civil, structural and transportation engineering. 22. Defendant Group Mackenzie amended trademark registration no. 2,091,275 from GROUP MACKENZIE to simply MACKENZIE by deleting GROUP in or about August To amend trademark registration no. 2,091,275, Defendant Group Mackenzie told the United States Patent and Trademark Office that: The removal of the term GROUP does not impact the commercial impression of the GROUP MACKENZIE mark and that consumers are unlikely to have assigned any meaning to the term GROUP as a source identifier, and have instead perceived the term MACKENZIE as the source of the GROUP MACKENZIE mark, and that dropping GROUP does not constitute a material alternation of the original mark. 24. Defendant was wrong. 25. The mark MACKENZIE and the mark GROUP MACKENZIE have different commercial impressions and are not interchangeable. Page 5

7 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 7 of 14 Page ID#: The two marks are different in at least that the first conveys the commercial impression that the mark owner and source of the services operate as a group, while the second carries no such connotation and conveys no such commercial impression. 27. Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. has even admitted that GROUP MACKENZIE conveys the commercial impression that the services offered under the mark are a full range of integrated design services and that the mark owner employs shareholder system. 28. Moreover, Defendant Group Mackenzie deleted the first word of its mark - and placement of a word as first in a mark tends to make that term dominant in a mark and be remembered by consumers. Thus, GROUP in GROUP MACKENZIE likely served as a differentiating element. 29. Regarding its change of its mark from Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. to GROUP MACKENZIE back in the 1990s, and highlighting the special commercial impression that Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. believed was conveyed by GROUP MACKENZIE, Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. has stated that: The new name [GROUP MACKENZIE] reflects the full range of integrated design services and heralds a change in company ownership moving toward a shareholder system in which employees are vested in the firm's success. (See the screen capture copied Page 6

8 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 8 of 14 Page ID#: 8 below. 30. The mark MACKENZIE alone lacks the commercial impression of a full range of integrated design services and a shareholder system of company ownership. 31. The Patent and Trademark Office did not republish Defendant Group Mackenzie s new mark, MACKENZIE, to allow the public to oppose Defendant Group Mackenzie s registration of the mark. Thus, Plaintiff had no chance to oppose the registration. 32. Defendants actions are knowing, willful, and without Plaintiff s authorization. Defendants are liable for the resulting acts of unfair competition, and trademark infringement. Page 7

9 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 9 of 14 Page ID#: 9 V. CAUSES OF ACTION A. Unfair Competition 33. Plaintiff, Mackenzie Architecture, repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 34. This cause of action for unfair competition arises under Section 43(a(1 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C (a(1, and Oregon state common law. 35. Defendants use of the MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, in commerce for architecture services as alleged hereinabove is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Defendants with Plaintiff or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of the services of Defendants and those of Plaintiff, and misrepresents the nature, characteristics, and qualities of those services. 36. The acts of Defendants constitute unfair competition in violation of Section 43(a(1 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a(1, and unfair competition under Oregon common law. 37. Plaintiff is without an adequate remedy at law because Defendants unfair competition is causing irreparable injury to Plaintiff, and unless said acts are enjoined by this Court, they will continue and Plaintiff will continue to suffer irreparable injury. 38. Defendants acts of unfair competition, if not enjoined, will cause Plaintiff to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury. B. Trademark Infringement 39. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. Page 8

10 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 10 of 14 Page ID#: The acts of Defendants constitute trademark infringement in violation Oregon common law. 41. Defendants use of MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, as alleged hereinabove is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the source, sponsorship, or approval of the products and services of Defendants in that others are likely to believe that Defendants services are in some way legitimately connected with, sponsored or licensed by, or otherwise related to Plaintiff. 42. Defendants use of MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, was made with actual or constructive knowledge of Plaintiff s rights in MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE. 43. Defendants use of MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, is without Plaintiff s consent or permission. 44. Defendants acts of trademark infringement, unless enjoined, will cause Plaintiff to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury. C. Improper Amendment 45. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 46. Defendant Group Mackenzie s amendment of trademark registration no. 2,091,275 was improper. 47. The Patent and Trademark Office should not have allowed Defendant Group Mackenzie to amend trademark registration no. 2,091,275 from GROUP MACKENZIE to MACKENZIE. Page 9

11 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 11 of 14 Page ID#: GROUP MACKENZIE and MACKENZIE have different commercial impression. 49. The Court should utilize its power under 15 USC 1119 to rectify the trademark register to change Defendant Group Mackenzie s registration back to GROUP MACKENZIE. D. Improper Ownership 50. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 51. Defendant Group Mackenzie s trademark registration no. 2,091,275 is indicated in United States Patent and Trademark Office records as being owned by GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN CORPORATION WASHINGTON 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PO BOX PORTLAND OREGON United State Patent and Trademark Office assignment records indicate that Registration No for GROUP MACKENZIE was assigned from Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.C. to Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design on September 30, On information and belief and according to the Washington Secretary of State records there is and has been no Washington entity known as Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design. 54. As it appears that Registration No was assigned to a non-existent entity, the Court should utilize its power under 15 USC 1119 to rectify the trademark register to cancel Registration No Page 10

12 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 12 of 14 Page ID#: 12 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Mackenzie Architecture, prays that, pursuant to 15 U.S.C to 1125 and Oregon state law: A. The Court finds that Plaintiff owns valid and subsisting trademark rights in MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE. B. Defendants be held liable under each claim for relief set forth in this Complaint. C. The Court grant an injunction that Defendants, their affiliated companies, and their agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, be enjoined from using MACKENZIE alone (however spelled or punctuated, whether capitalized, abbreviated, singular or plural, printed or stylized, whether alone or in combination with any word(s, punctuation or symbol(s, and whether used in caption, text, orally or otherwise, or any other reproduction, copy, colorable imitation or confusingly similar variation of MACKENZIE alone, as a trademark or service mark, trade name or domain name, or in advertising, distribution, sale, or offering for sale of architectural services. D. The Court grant an injunction that Defendants, their affiliated companies, and their agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, be enjoined from using the term MACKENZIE adjacent the term ARCHITECTURE, such as in Mackenzie Architecture. E. The Court order as part of the injunction and pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1116(a that Defendants file with the Court and serve on Plaintiff within thirty days after the service on the Defendants of the injunction, a report in writing under oath setting Page 11

13 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 13 of 14 Page ID#: 13 forth in detail the manner and form in which the Defendants have complied with the injunction. F. The Court utilize its power under 15 USC 1119 to order the Patent and Trademark Office to rectify the trademark register by cancelling trademark registration no. 2,091,275 or changing Defendant Group Mackenzie s trademark registration no. 2,091,275 back to GROUP MACKENZIE. G. Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiff s damages from Defendants use of MACKENZIE alone for architectural services, pursuant to 15 U.S.C and the equity powers of this Court. H. Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiff profits made in connection with their use of MACKENZIE alone for architectural services, pursuant to 15 U.S.C and the equity powers of this Court. I. Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys fees and disbursements incurred herein, pursuant to 15 U.S.C and the equity powers of this Court. J. Defendants be required to pay Plaintiff the costs of this action. K. The Court award Plaintiff such other and further relief as this Court deems just and equitable. Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 2, 2014 By: _s/ Kevin M. Hayes Kevin M. Hayes, OSB # kevin.hayes@klarquist.com Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon Telephone: Page 12

14 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 14 of 14 Page ID#: 14 Facsimile: Attorneys for Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture, Inc. Page 13

15 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 1 Page ID#: 15 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM. I. (a PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING& INTERIOR DESIGN (b (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES (c (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY (If Known II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only and One Box for Defendant PTF DEF PTF DEF (U.S. Government Not a Party or and (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY PROPERTY RIGHTS LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY PERSONAL PROPERTY REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS FEDERAL TAX SUITS Habeas Corpus: IMMIGRATION Other: V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only VI. CAUSE OF ACTION VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S IF ANY FOR OFFICE USE ONLY (specify (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity 15 U.S.C Trademark infringement and unfair competition CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ (See instructions: 06/02/2014 /s/ Kevin M. Hayes JURY DEMAND:

16 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 4 Page ID#: 16 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District District of Oregon of MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff(s v. Civil Action No. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE, an Oregon Corporation, and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING& INTERIOR DESIGN, Defendant(s a Washington Corporation SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 0:14-cv To: (Defendant s name and address MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. SW&W Registered Agents, Inc., Agent for Service of Process 1211SW5thAve.,Suite1900 Portland, OR A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a(2 or (3 you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff s attorney, whose name and address are: Kevin M. Hayes Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. CLERK OF COURT Date: Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

17 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 2 of 4 Page ID#: 17 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2 Civil Action No. 0:14-cv PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l This summons for (name of individual and title, if any was received by me on (date. I personally served the summons on the individual at (place on (date ; or I left the summons at the individual s residence or usual place of abode with (name, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date, and mailed a copy to the individual s last known address; or I served the summons on (name of individual designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization on (date I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or, who is ; or Other (specify:. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. Date: Server s signature Printed name and title Server s address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

18 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 3 of 4 Page ID#: 18 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District District of Oregon of MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff(s v. Civil Action No. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE, an Oregon Corporation, and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN, Defendant(s a Washington Corporation SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 0:14-cv To: (Defendant s name and address GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO Box Portland, OR A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a(2 or (3 you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff s attorney, whose name and address are: Kevin M. Hayes Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. CLERK OF COURT Date: Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

19 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 4 of 4 Page ID#: 19 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2 Civil Action No. 0:14-cv PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l This summons for (name of individual and title, if any was received by me on (date. I personally served the summons on the individual at (place on (date ; or I left the summons at the individual s residence or usual place of abode with (name, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date, and mailed a copy to the individual s last known address; or I served the summons on (name of individual designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization on (date I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or, who is ; or Other (specify:. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. Date: Server s signature Printed name and title Server s address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17 Case 3:15-cv-00058-AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17 THOMAS J. ROMANO, OSB No. 053661 E-mail: tromano@khpatent.com SHAWN J. KOLITCH, OSB No. 063980 E-mail: shawn@khpatent.com KIMBERLY N. FISHER,

More information

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP Case :0-cv-000 Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. sgibson@gibsonlowry.com J. SCOTT BURRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 sburris@gibsonlowry.com GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP City Center

More information

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION Case 3:15-cv-00681-GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION VAUGHAN SCOTT, Movant, VS. Civil Action No. 15-cv-

More information

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:16-cv-01398-YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Attorney for Voloshina Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204 michael@underdoglawyer.com

More information

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1 Case: 2:17-cv-00237-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SCOTT W. SCHIFF c/o Schiff & Associates

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Case 2:12-cv-00977-MAT Document 12 5 Filed 06/07/12 06/11/12 Page 1 of 2 AO 440 (Rev. 12/09 Summons in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District District of of Washington ArrivalStar

More information

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Case 9:18-cv-80674-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 Google LLC, a limited liability company vs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Plaintiff, CASE NO.

More information

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:18-cv-10833-RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X SPARK451 INC. :

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:18-cv-00772 Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14 James D. Weinberger (jweinberger@fzlz.com) Jessica Vosgerchian (jvosgerchian@fzlz.com) FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 4 Times Square, 17 th

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual, Case 2:03-cv-05534-NS Document 1 Filed 10/03/03 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ------------------------------------------ JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

More information

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Case 3:16-cv-01907-MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 783856 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 061058 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com John Burgess,

More information

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)

More information

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES Case 1:16-cv-11565-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS THE LIFE IS GOOD COMPANY, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) C.A. No. ) OOSHIRTS INC., ) Defendant

More information

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-0-jcm-vcf Document Filed // Page of R. Scott Weide, Esq. Nevada Bar No. sweide@weidemiller.com Ryan Gile, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 0 rgile@weidemiller.com Kendelee L. Works, Esq. Nevada Bar No. kworks@weidemiller.com

More information

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Case 2:17-cv-01100-EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Trent Baker Baker & Associates PLLC 358 S 700 E B154 Salt Lake City,

More information

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :-cv-0-raj Document Filed 0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE MIRINA CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, v. Plaintiff, MARINA BIOTECH,

More information

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16 Case 2:12-cv-01124-TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16 Joseph Pia, joe.pia@padrm.com (9945) Tyson B. Snow tsnow@padrm.com (10747) Fili Sagapulete fili@padrm.com (13348) PIA ANDERSON DORIUS REYNARD

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Case 1:18-cv-11065 Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 R. Terry Parker, Esquire Kevin P. Scura, Esquire RATH, YOUNG & PIGNATELLI, P.C. 120 Water Street, 2nd Floor Boston, MA 02109 Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:15-cv-00679 Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION OCA GREATER HOUSTON and MALLIKA DAS; Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL

More information

Case 3:18-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION Case 3:18-cv-00062-TBR Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION Kathy Goodman, individually, } and on behalf of a

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ECO ADVENTURE HOLDINGS, LLC and OZARK MOUNTAIN ZIPLINE, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, ADVENTURE ZIPLINES OF BRANSON LLC,

More information

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv-00086 document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION ASW, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) CASE NO. 1:18-cv-86 )

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Case :-cv-000-e Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 GLUCK LAW FIRM P.C. Jeffrey S. Gluck (SBN 0) N. Kings Road # Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: 0.. ERIKSON LAW GROUP David Alden Erikson (SBN

More information

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17 Case 1:13-cv-20345-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA THE AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO David A. Kupernik Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 24K Real Estate

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT Case 1:08-cv-00749-RPM Document 1 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. SMARTWOOL CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Case 1:17-cv-00062-JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 LODESTAR ANSTALT, a Liechtenstein Corporation IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Plaintiff, vs. Cause No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case 2:09-cv-00807-EAS-TPK Document 1 Filed 09/15/09 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. and : ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.,

More information

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Michael K. Friedland (SBN, michael.friedland@knobbe.com Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen (SBN,0 lauren.katzenellenbogen@knobbe.com Ali S. Razai (SBN,

More information

Case: 4:15-cv CEJ Doc. #: 1 Filed: 12/07/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:15-cv CEJ Doc. #: 1 Filed: 12/07/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 Case: 4:15-cv-01801-CEJ Doc. #: 1 Filed: 12/07/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 Case: 4:15-cv-01801-CEJ Doc. #: 1 Filed: 12/07/15 Page: 2 of 8 PageID #: 2 Case: 4:15-cv-01801-CEJ Doc. #: 1 Filed: 12/07/15 Page:

More information

Case: 5:17-cv JMH Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1

Case: 5:17-cv JMH Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1 Case: 5:17-cv-00374-JMH Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON SHERLTON DIETERICH, on behalf of himself

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. CASE 0:11-cv-01043-PJS -LIB Document 1 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 3M COMPANY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ELLISON SYSTEMS, INC., dba

More information

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 Case: 4:16-cv-01163-DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION FERMENTED PROJECTS, LLC d/b/a SIDE PROJECT,

More information

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10 USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv-00193-JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10 LIGHTNING ONE, INC; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:18-cv-193

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION David W. Axelrod, OSB #750231 Email: daxelrod@schwabe.com Devon Zastrow Newman, OSB #014627 Email: dnewman@schwabe.com Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C. 1211 SW 5th Ave., Suite 1900 Telephone: 503.222.9981

More information

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0-jfw-jc Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: North Central Avenue Suite 00 0 GARY J. NELSON, CA Bar No. GNelson@lrrc.com ANNE WANG, CA Bar No. 000 AWang@lrrc.com DREW WILSON, CA Bar No. DWilson@lrrc.com

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; DD IP HOLDER LLC, a Delaware Limited

More information

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION Case 2:11-cv-00392-CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PHELAN HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a PINCHER=S CRAB SHACK,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DAVID M. WHITE; and XAVIER ALLMON, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated employees, v. Plaintiffs, REEDER CHEVROLET,

More information

2:15-cv LJM-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

2:15-cv LJM-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION 2:15-cv-10137-LJM-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION AUTOMOTIVE BODY PARTS ASSOCIATION, CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO: Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: JOHN M. BEGAKIS (Bar No. ) john@altviewlawgroup.com JASON W. BROOKS (Bar No. ) Jason@altviewlawgroup.com ALTVIEW LAW GROUP, LLP 00 Wilshire Boulevard,

More information

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No. Case 3:17-cv-01907-JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PEAK WELLNESS, INC., a Connecticut corporation, Case No. Plaintiff, v.

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:13-cv-04902 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS True Value Company, vs. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Andrew

More information

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Mark D. Kremer (SB# 00) m.kremer@conklelaw.com Zachary Page (SB# ) z.page@conklelaw.com CONKLE, KREMER & ENGEL Professional Law Corporation 0 Wilshire

More information

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. Case 9:13-cv-80700-KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. THE ESTATE OF MARILYN MONROE, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. MONROE

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-07914 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 REMIEN LAW, INC. 8 S. Michigan Ave. Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312 332.0606 Attorneys for Plaintiff Re:Invention Inc. IN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Chris West and Automodeals, LLC, Plaintiffs, 5:16-cv-1205 v. Bret Lee Gardner, AutomoDeals Inc., Arturo Art Gomez Tagle, and

More information

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/25/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/25/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 Case: 4:16-cv-01210 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/25/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ANDREW ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 4:16-cv-1210

More information

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 5:18-cv-00562 Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARISOL L. URIBE, individually, and on behalf of similarly situated consumers, vs. Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. v. Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION KEVIN KNAPP, an individual on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KING S HAWAIIAN BAKERY SOUTHEAST, INC., a Georgia corporation; KING S HAWAIIAN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a California corporation;

More information

Case 2:08-cv JAM-DAD Document 220 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:08-cv JAM-DAD Document 220 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 21 Case :0-cv-0-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0// Page of MARKET STREET, TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFORNIA 0-0 () -000 0 PAULA M. YOST (State Bar No. ) paula.yost@snrdenton.com IAN R. BARKER (State Bar No. 0) ian.barker@snrdenton.com

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 Case 1:18-cv-02068 Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- X MARIUSZ

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 1:17-cv-01530-CCC Document 1 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENTSPLY SIRONA INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. ) NET32, INC., ) JURY DEMANDED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571 Case 1:07-cv-00571-JAB-PTS Document 1 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 07-CV-571 ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Case No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND GERMANTOWN COPY CENTER, INC., on its own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff vs. Case No. ROGER NAAMAN INSURANCE SERVICES,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT Case 1:13-cv-03311-CAP Document 1 Filed 10/04/13 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION YELLOWPAGES.COM LLC, Plaintiff, v. YP ONLINE, LLC,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADEMARK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADEMARK 2:16-cv-11810-MAG-RSW Doc # 10 Filed 06/08/16 Pg 1 of 24 Pg ID 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CONCEIVEX, INC., v. Plaintiff, RINOVUM WOMEN S HEALTH, INC.,

More information

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 2:18-cv-03821-SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC 100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500 Garden City, New York 11530 Tel: (516 203-7600 Fax: (516 706-5055 Email:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION WHEEL PROS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, WHEELS OUTLET, INC., ABDUL NAIM, AND DOES 1-25, Defendants. Case No. Electronically

More information

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:07-cv-02334-CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS PAYLESS SHOESOURCE WORLDWIDE, INC. ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 Case 1:14-cv-00026-JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CONTOUR HARDENING, INC. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Mon Cheri Bridals, LLC ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-2516 ) John Does 1-81 ) Judge: ) ) Magistrate: ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION Case 5:17-cv-00299-RH-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PATRICIA LYNN GOTHARD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 5:17-CV-299

More information

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/12/15 Page1 of 7

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/12/15 Page1 of 7 Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of DUANE MORRIS LLP Karineh Khachatourian (CA SBN ) kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com Patrick S. Salceda (CA SBN ) psalceda@duanemorris.com David T. Xue, Ph.D. (CA SBN )

More information

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 Case 2:18-cv-00233 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NELSON ESPINAL, -against- Plaintiff, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., CIVIL

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand Case 1:15-cv-10597 Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DUNE JEWELRY, INC. Plaintiff, v. REBECCA JAMES, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-10597

More information

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC.. Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 1 Bradley M. Ganz, OSB 94076 Lloyd L. Pollard II, OSB 07490 Ganz Law, P.c. P.O. Box 2200 163 SE 2 nd Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124 (503)

More information

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of H. STAN JOHNSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: BRIAN A. MORRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: COHEN-JOHNSON, LLC Dean Martin Drive, Ste. G Las Vegas, NV (0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:14-cv-01147-HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1 BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION WEEMS INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a LEGACY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Case No. 1:16-cv-109LRR v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY

More information

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6 Case 1:11-cv-00107-JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION BONRO MEDICAL, INC., Plaintiff, V. LffiERTY MEDICAL

More information

Case 3:19-cv BRM-TJB Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:19-cv BRM-TJB Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:19-cv-00513-BRM-TJB Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RICHARD VARGAS, and similarly situated individuals, vs. Plaintiff, GUILIANO

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 EAGLES NEST OUTFITTERS, INC., Plaintiff DYLAN HEWLETT, D/B/A BEAR BUTT, Defendant.

More information

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:16-cv Vale v. Cava et al. Document 7. View Document.

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:16-cv Vale v. Cava et al. Document 7. View Document. PlainSite Legal Document New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:16-cv-07294 Vale v. Cava et al Document 7 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398 BOJANGLES INTERNATIONAL, LLC, v. Plaintiff, HARDEES RESTAURANTS, LLC and

More information

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET ILND 44 (Rev. 07/10/17 Case: 1:18-cv-04144 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET The ILND 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT Case 1:16-cv-00428-DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, ROCKY MOUNTAIN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Kenneth J. Montgomery, Esq. (KJM-8622) KENNETH J. MONTGOMERY, PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 451 Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.403.9261 Telephone 718.403.9593 Facsimile UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO MEDNOW CLINICS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SPECTRUM HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendants. Case No.: COMPLAINT Plaintiff Mednow Clinics, LLC ( Mednow or Plaintiff, through

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : Brent T. Winder (USB #8765) Brent A. Orozco (USB #9572) JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & McDONOUGH PC Attorneys for Maggie Sottero Designs, LLC 170 South Main Street, Suite 1500 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone

More information

Case 1:11-cv CMA-MEH Document 6 Filed 08/10/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv CMA-MEH Document 6 Filed 08/10/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:11-cv-02051-CMA-MEH Document 6 Filed 08/10/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02051-CMA-MEH FIRST DESCENTS, Inc.

More information

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9 Case 2:11-cv-00241-CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9 Alan L. Edwards (6086) Scott C. Hilton (12554) KUNZLER NEEDHAM MASSEY & THORPE 8 East Broadway, Suite 600 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone:

More information

Case: 2:17-cv EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:17-cv EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1 Case: 2:17-cv-01086-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JESUS CASAREZ, Individually and on Behalf of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF INTRODUCTION Case 1:18-cv-04956-MHC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SUSHI CONCEPTS SUNSET, LLC, v. Plaintiff, MOD RESTAURANT INC., AND

More information

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16 Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Jinny Kim, State Bar No. Alexis Alvarez, State Bar No. The LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT Case :-cv-00-r-as Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Noah R. Balch (SBN noah.balch@kattenlaw.com Joanna M. Hall (SBN 0 joanna.hall@kattenlaw.com 0 Century Park East, Suite

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/2015 06:27 PM INDEX NO. 650458/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C Case 1:14-cv-09012-DLC Document 2 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:14-cv-09012-DLC

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Case 2:15-cv-00503 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 INTUITIVE BUILDING CONTROLS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, Case

More information

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No. Case 0:10-cv-01142-MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Wells Fargo & Company, John Does 1-10, vs. Plaintiff, Defendants. Court File No.: COMPLAINT

More information

Case 2:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4 Case 2:16-cv-00366-BLW Document 1 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4 Peter J. Smith IV, ISB No. 6997 Jillian H. Caires, ISB No. 9130 SMITH + MALEK, PLLC 1250 Ironwood Dr, Ste 316 Coeur d Alene, ID 83814 Tel: 208-215-2411

More information

Case 3:17-cv BEN-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:17-cv BEN-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3 Case :-cv-044-ben-bgs Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 4 5 MICHAEL A. CONGER (State Bar #488 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. CONGER San Dieguito Road, Suite 4-4 P.O. Box 94 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 90 Telephone:

More information

Case 2:10-cv KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

Case 2:10-cv KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Case 2:10-cv-00955-KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 721 BOURBON, INC., Plaintiff, vs. DIAMOND BOURBON, INC., Defendant.

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:17-cv-00549 Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 Civil Action No. GOLIGHT, INC., a Nebraska corporation, v. Plaintiff, KH INDUSTRIES, INC., a New York corporation, UNITY MANUFACTURING

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. Civil Action No. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. Civil Action No. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 3M COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. DÉCOR CRAFT, INC., Defendant. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION,

More information

Case 1:11-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:11-cv-00742-UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MASIMO CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE GREENVILLE DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE GREENVILLE DIVISION COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE GREENVILLE DIVISION GREEN PARTY OF TENNESSEE, Plaintiffs Vs. TRE HARGETT in his official capacity Case No.: as Tennessee Secretary of State,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Case 6:10-cv-00068-LED Document 1 Filed 02/27/2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SONIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v. Plaintiff, VTECH ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. PS AUDIO, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES ALLEN, an individual, Defendant. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

More information