Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1"

Transcription

1 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 Kevin M. Hayes, OSB # KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Civil No. 0:14-cv v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE, an Oregon Corporation, and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN, a Washington Corporation, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendants.

2 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 2 of 14 Page ID#: 2 Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture, Inc., doing business as Mackenzie Architecture, through its attorneys, complains of Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. s, ( Mackenzie Engineering use of the mark MACKENZIE and Defendant Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design ( Group Mackenzie use and registration of the mark MACKENZIE (collectively Defendants, and alleges as follows, upon knowledge with respect to itself and its own acts, and upon information and belief as to all other matters: I. THE MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE MARK AND THE NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Mackenzie Architecture owns the mark MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE and has been using the mark for at least nearly a decade for its architecture services. 2. Before Mackenzie Architecture adopted its MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE mark, it used other marks comprising MACKENZIE. 3. Until recently, Defendant, Mackenzie Engineering used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for its engineering services, which also included, in some cases, architecture services. It is believed that Defendant Group Mackenzie also used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for its engineering services, which also included, in some cases, architecture services. It is unclear which of Defendants actually own the mark GROUP MACKENZIE as Mackenzie Engineering has stated that the mark is its mark, but Group Mackenzie is the listed owner of the trademark registration that was for GROUP MACKENZIE and has been improperly amended to MACKENZIE alone (Reg. No It is believed that Mackenzie Engineering and Group Mackenzie are related entities acting in concert with each other. Page 1

3 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 3 of 14 Page ID#: 3 4. It is believed that one or both of Defendants used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for their services from around sometime around 1996 until about August In that time period, it is believed that Plaintiff and Defendants were able to coexist using their respective marks, MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE and GROUP MACKENZIE. 6. But then, around August 2013, Defendants dropped GROUP from the mark GROUP MACKENZIE and began operating under the mark MACKENZIE alone. 7. Defendants change to simply MACKENZIE usurps rights in all MACKENZIE formative marks and confuses consumers into mistakenly believing that Defendants and Plaintiff are associated, or that one is infringing the other. 8. Making the situation even worse in this case, Defendant Mackenzie Engineering also uses the Internet search heading for its website Mackenzie Architecture, which is of course, Plaintiff s mark. 9. Plaintiff brings this suit to stop Defendants from causing confusion with Plaintiff s MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE mark. II. THE PARTIES 10. Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture Inc. is an Oregon corporation operating in the state of Oregon with its principal place of business in Portland, Oregon. Plaintiff is located and does business within this judicial district. 11. Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. is an Oregon corporation operating in the state of Oregon with its principal place of business in Portland, Oregon. Defendant is located and does business within this judicial district. Page 2

4 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 4 of 14 Page ID#: Defendant Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design s Trademark Registration No states that Group Mackenzie is a Washington Corporation. Thus, it is believed that it is a Washington Corporation. Group Mackenzie s principal place of business is believed to be in Portland, Oregon, as Trademark Registration No states that the address for Group Mackenzie is in Portland, Oregon. Defendant is located and does business within this judicial district. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 13. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action because this action arises under the Federal Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C , jurisdiction being conferred in accordance with 15 U.S.C and 28 U.S.C and Supplemental jurisdiction over the causes of action under Oregon state law is proper as those causes of action are substantially related to the causes of action over which the Court has original jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1338(b and Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b in that Defendants are transacting business within this judicial district and have committed acts complained of herein in this judicial district (or those acts have been aimed at and felt within this judicial district. IV. THE FACTS 14. Plaintiff has used the mark and been known as MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE for architectural services since at least as early as Plaintiff s owner s (Hilary Mackenzie father, Tom Mackenzie, was a founder of Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. in the 1960 s. On information and belief, Defendants were aware of Plaintiff s use of MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE since at least 2005 and other MACKENZIE formative marks since at least the 1990s. Page 3

5 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 5 of 14 Page ID#: Defendants did not begin use of the mark MACKENZIE alone until about August Before that time, Defendants did not use the mark MACKENZIE alone for their services. Instead, Defendants used the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for their services. 17. Defendants did not begin use of Mackenzie Architecture, shown below in Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. s Internet search heading until sometime in or after August Defendants use an Internet search heading comprising Mackenzie Architecture in connection with offering architecture services to third parties. 19. Defendants use the mark MACKENZIE alone in connection with offering architecture services to third parties. Page 4

6 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 6 of 14 Page ID#: Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. has taken telephone calls for Mackenzie Architecture and answered affirmatively that it was Mackenzie Architecture when asked. Defendant has then transferred the callers to employees in its architectural services department. A person in Defendant s employ has also admitted that Defendant s change to use of MACKENZIE alone for architecture services could cause confusion with MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE. 21. Defendant Group Mackenzie is listed as the owner of federal trademark registration no. 2,091,275, which was initially for the mark GROUP MACKENZIE for architectural services; engineering services in the fields of civil, structural and transportation engineering. 22. Defendant Group Mackenzie amended trademark registration no. 2,091,275 from GROUP MACKENZIE to simply MACKENZIE by deleting GROUP in or about August To amend trademark registration no. 2,091,275, Defendant Group Mackenzie told the United States Patent and Trademark Office that: The removal of the term GROUP does not impact the commercial impression of the GROUP MACKENZIE mark and that consumers are unlikely to have assigned any meaning to the term GROUP as a source identifier, and have instead perceived the term MACKENZIE as the source of the GROUP MACKENZIE mark, and that dropping GROUP does not constitute a material alternation of the original mark. 24. Defendant was wrong. 25. The mark MACKENZIE and the mark GROUP MACKENZIE have different commercial impressions and are not interchangeable. Page 5

7 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 7 of 14 Page ID#: The two marks are different in at least that the first conveys the commercial impression that the mark owner and source of the services operate as a group, while the second carries no such connotation and conveys no such commercial impression. 27. Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. has even admitted that GROUP MACKENZIE conveys the commercial impression that the services offered under the mark are a full range of integrated design services and that the mark owner employs shareholder system. 28. Moreover, Defendant Group Mackenzie deleted the first word of its mark - and placement of a word as first in a mark tends to make that term dominant in a mark and be remembered by consumers. Thus, GROUP in GROUP MACKENZIE likely served as a differentiating element. 29. Regarding its change of its mark from Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. to GROUP MACKENZIE back in the 1990s, and highlighting the special commercial impression that Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. believed was conveyed by GROUP MACKENZIE, Defendant Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. has stated that: The new name [GROUP MACKENZIE] reflects the full range of integrated design services and heralds a change in company ownership moving toward a shareholder system in which employees are vested in the firm's success. (See the screen capture copied Page 6

8 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 8 of 14 Page ID#: 8 below. 30. The mark MACKENZIE alone lacks the commercial impression of a full range of integrated design services and a shareholder system of company ownership. 31. The Patent and Trademark Office did not republish Defendant Group Mackenzie s new mark, MACKENZIE, to allow the public to oppose Defendant Group Mackenzie s registration of the mark. Thus, Plaintiff had no chance to oppose the registration. 32. Defendants actions are knowing, willful, and without Plaintiff s authorization. Defendants are liable for the resulting acts of unfair competition, and trademark infringement. Page 7

9 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 9 of 14 Page ID#: 9 V. CAUSES OF ACTION A. Unfair Competition 33. Plaintiff, Mackenzie Architecture, repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 34. This cause of action for unfair competition arises under Section 43(a(1 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C (a(1, and Oregon state common law. 35. Defendants use of the MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, in commerce for architecture services as alleged hereinabove is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Defendants with Plaintiff or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of the services of Defendants and those of Plaintiff, and misrepresents the nature, characteristics, and qualities of those services. 36. The acts of Defendants constitute unfair competition in violation of Section 43(a(1 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a(1, and unfair competition under Oregon common law. 37. Plaintiff is without an adequate remedy at law because Defendants unfair competition is causing irreparable injury to Plaintiff, and unless said acts are enjoined by this Court, they will continue and Plaintiff will continue to suffer irreparable injury. 38. Defendants acts of unfair competition, if not enjoined, will cause Plaintiff to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury. B. Trademark Infringement 39. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. Page 8

10 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 10 of 14 Page ID#: The acts of Defendants constitute trademark infringement in violation Oregon common law. 41. Defendants use of MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, as alleged hereinabove is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the source, sponsorship, or approval of the products and services of Defendants in that others are likely to believe that Defendants services are in some way legitimately connected with, sponsored or licensed by, or otherwise related to Plaintiff. 42. Defendants use of MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, was made with actual or constructive knowledge of Plaintiff s rights in MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE. 43. Defendants use of MACKENZIE and Mackenzie Architecture, is without Plaintiff s consent or permission. 44. Defendants acts of trademark infringement, unless enjoined, will cause Plaintiff to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury. C. Improper Amendment 45. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 46. Defendant Group Mackenzie s amendment of trademark registration no. 2,091,275 was improper. 47. The Patent and Trademark Office should not have allowed Defendant Group Mackenzie to amend trademark registration no. 2,091,275 from GROUP MACKENZIE to MACKENZIE. Page 9

11 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 11 of 14 Page ID#: GROUP MACKENZIE and MACKENZIE have different commercial impression. 49. The Court should utilize its power under 15 USC 1119 to rectify the trademark register to change Defendant Group Mackenzie s registration back to GROUP MACKENZIE. D. Improper Ownership 50. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 51. Defendant Group Mackenzie s trademark registration no. 2,091,275 is indicated in United States Patent and Trademark Office records as being owned by GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN CORPORATION WASHINGTON 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PO BOX PORTLAND OREGON United State Patent and Trademark Office assignment records indicate that Registration No for GROUP MACKENZIE was assigned from Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.C. to Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design on September 30, On information and belief and according to the Washington Secretary of State records there is and has been no Washington entity known as Group Mackenzie Incorporated Architecture Planning & Interior Design. 54. As it appears that Registration No was assigned to a non-existent entity, the Court should utilize its power under 15 USC 1119 to rectify the trademark register to cancel Registration No Page 10

12 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 12 of 14 Page ID#: 12 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Mackenzie Architecture, prays that, pursuant to 15 U.S.C to 1125 and Oregon state law: A. The Court finds that Plaintiff owns valid and subsisting trademark rights in MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE. B. Defendants be held liable under each claim for relief set forth in this Complaint. C. The Court grant an injunction that Defendants, their affiliated companies, and their agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, be enjoined from using MACKENZIE alone (however spelled or punctuated, whether capitalized, abbreviated, singular or plural, printed or stylized, whether alone or in combination with any word(s, punctuation or symbol(s, and whether used in caption, text, orally or otherwise, or any other reproduction, copy, colorable imitation or confusingly similar variation of MACKENZIE alone, as a trademark or service mark, trade name or domain name, or in advertising, distribution, sale, or offering for sale of architectural services. D. The Court grant an injunction that Defendants, their affiliated companies, and their agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, be enjoined from using the term MACKENZIE adjacent the term ARCHITECTURE, such as in Mackenzie Architecture. E. The Court order as part of the injunction and pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1116(a that Defendants file with the Court and serve on Plaintiff within thirty days after the service on the Defendants of the injunction, a report in writing under oath setting Page 11

13 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 13 of 14 Page ID#: 13 forth in detail the manner and form in which the Defendants have complied with the injunction. F. The Court utilize its power under 15 USC 1119 to order the Patent and Trademark Office to rectify the trademark register by cancelling trademark registration no. 2,091,275 or changing Defendant Group Mackenzie s trademark registration no. 2,091,275 back to GROUP MACKENZIE. G. Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiff s damages from Defendants use of MACKENZIE alone for architectural services, pursuant to 15 U.S.C and the equity powers of this Court. H. Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiff profits made in connection with their use of MACKENZIE alone for architectural services, pursuant to 15 U.S.C and the equity powers of this Court. I. Defendants be required to pay to Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys fees and disbursements incurred herein, pursuant to 15 U.S.C and the equity powers of this Court. J. Defendants be required to pay Plaintiff the costs of this action. K. The Court award Plaintiff such other and further relief as this Court deems just and equitable. Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 2, 2014 By: _s/ Kevin M. Hayes Kevin M. Hayes, OSB # Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon Telephone: Page 12

14 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 14 of 14 Page ID#: 14 Facsimile: Attorneys for Plaintiff Mackenzie Architecture, Inc. Page 13

15 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 1 Page ID#: 15 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM. I. (a PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING& INTERIOR DESIGN (b (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES (c (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY (If Known II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only and One Box for Defendant PTF DEF PTF DEF (U.S. Government Not a Party or and (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY PROPERTY RIGHTS LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY PERSONAL PROPERTY REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS FEDERAL TAX SUITS Habeas Corpus: IMMIGRATION Other: V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only VI. CAUSE OF ACTION VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S IF ANY FOR OFFICE USE ONLY (specify (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity 15 U.S.C Trademark infringement and unfair competition CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ (See instructions: 06/02/2014 /s/ Kevin M. Hayes JURY DEMAND:

16 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 4 Page ID#: 16 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District District of Oregon of MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff(s v. Civil Action No. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE, an Oregon Corporation, and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING& INTERIOR DESIGN, Defendant(s a Washington Corporation SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 0:14-cv To: (Defendant s name and address MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. SW&W Registered Agents, Inc., Agent for Service of Process 1211SW5thAve.,Suite1900 Portland, OR A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a(2 or (3 you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff s attorney, whose name and address are: Kevin M. Hayes Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. CLERK OF COURT Date: Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

17 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 2 of 4 Page ID#: 17 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2 Civil Action No. 0:14-cv PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l This summons for (name of individual and title, if any was received by me on (date. I personally served the summons on the individual at (place on (date ; or I left the summons at the individual s residence or usual place of abode with (name, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date, and mailed a copy to the individual s last known address; or I served the summons on (name of individual designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization on (date I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or, who is ; or Other (specify:. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. Date: Server s signature Printed name and title Server s address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

18 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 3 of 4 Page ID#: 18 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District District of Oregon of MACKENZIE ARCHITECTURE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff(s v. Civil Action No. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. d/b/a MACKENZIE, an Oregon Corporation, and GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN, Defendant(s a Washington Corporation SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 0:14-cv To: (Defendant s name and address GROUP MACKENZIE INCORPORATED ARCHITECTURE PLANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO Box Portland, OR A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a(2 or (3 you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff s attorney, whose name and address are: Kevin M. Hayes Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. CLERK OF COURT Date: Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

19 Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1-2 Filed 06/02/14 Page 4 of 4 Page ID#: 19 AO 440 (Rev. 06/12 Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2 Civil Action No. 0:14-cv PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l This summons for (name of individual and title, if any was received by me on (date. I personally served the summons on the individual at (place on (date ; or I left the summons at the individual s residence or usual place of abode with (name, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date, and mailed a copy to the individual s last known address; or I served the summons on (name of individual designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization on (date I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or, who is ; or Other (specify:. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. Date: Server s signature Printed name and title Server s address Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP Case :0-cv-000 Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. sgibson@gibsonlowry.com J. SCOTT BURRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 sburris@gibsonlowry.com GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP City Center

More information

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1 Case: 2:17-cv-00237-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SCOTT W. SCHIFF c/o Schiff & Associates

More information

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Case 3:16-cv-01907-MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 783856 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 061058 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com John Burgess,

More information

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES Case 1:16-cv-11565-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS THE LIFE IS GOOD COMPANY, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) C.A. No. ) OOSHIRTS INC., ) Defendant

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Case 2:12-cv-00977-MAT Document 12 5 Filed 06/07/12 06/11/12 Page 1 of 2 AO 440 (Rev. 12/09 Summons in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District District of of Washington ArrivalStar

More information

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11 Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)

More information

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Case 2:17-cv-01100-EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Trent Baker Baker & Associates PLLC 358 S 700 E B154 Salt Lake City,

More information

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Case 1:17-cv-00062-JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 LODESTAR ANSTALT, a Liechtenstein Corporation IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Plaintiff, vs. Cause No.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ECO ADVENTURE HOLDINGS, LLC and OZARK MOUNTAIN ZIPLINE, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, ADVENTURE ZIPLINES OF BRANSON LLC,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; DD IP HOLDER LLC, a Delaware Limited

More information

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:07-cv-02334-CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS PAYLESS SHOESOURCE WORLDWIDE, INC. ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiff,

More information

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION WEEMS INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a LEGACY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Case No. 1:16-cv-109LRR v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571 Case 1:07-cv-00571-JAB-PTS Document 1 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 07-CV-571 ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING

More information

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of H. STAN JOHNSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: BRIAN A. MORRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: COHEN-JOHNSON, LLC Dean Martin Drive, Ste. G Las Vegas, NV (0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 EAGLES NEST OUTFITTERS, INC., Plaintiff DYLAN HEWLETT, D/B/A BEAR BUTT, Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398 BOJANGLES INTERNATIONAL, LLC, v. Plaintiff, HARDEES RESTAURANTS, LLC and

More information

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9 Case 2:11-cv-00241-CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9 Alan L. Edwards (6086) Scott C. Hilton (12554) KUNZLER NEEDHAM MASSEY & THORPE 8 East Broadway, Suite 600 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone:

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:17-cv-00549 Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 Civil Action No. GOLIGHT, INC., a Nebraska corporation, v. Plaintiff, KH INDUSTRIES, INC., a New York corporation, UNITY MANUFACTURING

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/2015 06:27 PM INDEX NO. 650458/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C Case 1:14-cv-09012-DLC Document 2 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:14-cv-09012-DLC

More information

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6 Case 1:11-cv-00107-JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION BONRO MEDICAL, INC., Plaintiff, V. LffiERTY MEDICAL

More information

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:17-cv-08745-AJN Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DELTA AIR LINES, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) FAREMACHINE, LLC d/b/a

More information

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI Case: 4:13-cv-01501 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI VICTORY OUTREACH ) INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ) a California

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : Brent T. Winder (USB #8765) Brent A. Orozco (USB #9572) JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & McDONOUGH PC Attorneys for Maggie Sottero Designs, LLC 170 South Main Street, Suite 1500 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:17-cv-00499-MHC Document 1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. JOHN DOES

More information

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:14-cv-12053-RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KEDS, LLC, and SR HOLDINGS, LLC, v. VANS, INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant.

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 CHRISTOPHER S. RUHLAND (SBN 0) Email: christopher.ruhland@ dechert.com MICHELLE M. RUTHERFORD (SBN ) Email: michelle.rutherford@ dechert.com US Bank

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES Case 6:07-cv-00492-LED Document 1 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON Trent West, Plaintiff, v. Target Corporation, and Helzberg Diamond Shops,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00-svw-man Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Willmore F. Holbrow, III (SB# bill_holbrow@bstz.com James W. Ahn (SB# James_ahn@bstz.com BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN, LLP 00 Wilshire

More information

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIGNATURES NETWORK, INC. : a Delaware corporation, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action

More information

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to U.S.C. 1 because a substantial part of the events

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:17-cv-01715-JRT-DTS Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA HORMEL FOODS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability corporation, and HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION,

More information

Case 4:14-cv Document CIVIL 1-3 COVER Filed SHEET in TXSD on 02/28/14 Page 1 of 2

Case 4:14-cv Document CIVIL 1-3 COVER Filed SHEET in TXSD on 02/28/14 Page 1 of 2 JS44 (Rev. 1/08 NDGA) Case 4:14-cv-00510 Document CIVIL 1-3 COVER Filed SHEET in TXSD on 02/28/14 Page 1 of 2 The JS44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement

More information

Plaintiff, similarly situated, files this Complaint against Defendant, KLOPP INVESTMENT. attorneys' fees and costs.

Plaintiff, similarly situated, files this Complaint against Defendant, KLOPP INVESTMENT. attorneys' fees and costs. Case 1:17-cv-20584-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION DANIEL RAMSAY, for himself and on behalf of others

More information

Case 2:17-cv CCC-MF Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : :

Case 2:17-cv CCC-MF Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : Case 217-cv-01091-CCC-MF Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1 LAWRENCE C. HERSH Attorney at Law 17 Sylvan Street, Suite 102B Rutherford, NJ 07070 (201) 507-6300 Attorney for Plaintiff, on behalf

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action Number 13-cv-1404 MYELOTEC, INC. a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiff v BIOVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC a Colorado Corporation, Defendant

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-02916 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 BODUM USA, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiffs, v. No.

More information

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SPIN MASTER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HELLODISCOUNTSTORE.COM,

More information

2:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/12/12 Pg 1 of 17 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

2:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/12/12 Pg 1 of 17 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 2:12-cv-14521-GAD-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/12/12 Pg 1 of 17 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN CVG-SAB, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:12-cv-14521 v. FACEBOOK INC. Defendant. follows:

More information

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Case 1:15-cv-00014-CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Andrew S. Hansen (Utah Bar No. 9819; Email: Andrew@White-Knuckle.org) David A. Jones (Utah Bar No. 10134; Email: Dave@White-Knuckle.org) WHITE

More information

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23 Case :-cv-0-sk Document Filed 0// Page of James R. Patterson, CA Bar No. Allison H. Goddard, CA Bar No. Elizabeth A. Mitchell CA Bar No. PATTERSON LAW GROUP 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, CA Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-lab-wvg Document Filed 0// Page of 0 LANAK & HANNA, P.C. Christopher M. Cullen, Esq. (Bar No. ) Michael K. Murray, Esq. (Bar No. ) The City Drive South, Suite 0 Orange, CA Telephone: () 0-0

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 17113 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. PANDORA MEDIA,

More information

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:10-cv-10498 Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSE CORPORATION, vs. Plaintiff, JOHN MEYERER, NIKOLAOS KRIDZELIS, KEVIN

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 Case: 1:17-cv-01860 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MIKHAIL ABRAMOV, individually ) and on behalf

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TELA INNOVATIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff, HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC., Defendants. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 Case 2:16-cv-01392 Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICOBA LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY

More information

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10 Case 1:18-cv-00020-BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10 Brandon T. Berrett, ISB # 8995 Brooke B. Redmond, ISB # 7274 Wright Brothers Law Office, PLLC 1440 Blue Lakes Boulevard North P.O. Box 5678

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION GREENOLOGY PRODUCTS, INC., a ) North Carolina corporation ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 16-CV-800

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 Case 1:18-cv-01866 Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------X AURORA LED TECHNOLOGY,

More information

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:11-cv-23619-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MAINSTREAM ADVERTISING, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,

More information

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Case 2:14-cv-14634 Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MIDWESTERN MIDGET FOOTBALL CLUB INC., v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 Case 1:16-cv-00065 Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION PRAXAIR, INC., PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiffs,

More information

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Koch Industries, Inc. ( Koch or Plaintiff ) states the following

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Koch Industries, Inc. ( Koch or Plaintiff ) states the following Case 2:10-cv-01275-DAK Document 2 Filed 12/28/10 Page 1 of 17 JULIETTE P. WHITE (9616) MICHAEL W. YOUNG (12282) PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 201 South Main Street, Suite 1800 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Advanced Processor Technologies LLC Plaintiff, v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-155

More information

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 Case 4:15-cv-00384-A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION BOBBIE WATERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) International Oddities Inc v. Domestic Oddities Wholesale Distribution LLC et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 Mark B. Mizrahi Esq. (State Bar # mmizrahi@wrslawyers.com Lance M. Pritikin, Esq. (State Bar #0 lpritikin@wrslawyers.com

More information

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:17-cv-11285-RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SPIDER SEARCH ANALYTICS LLC Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. TRIAL BY JURY

More information

Case 1:14-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:14-cv-02643-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CASE NO. OF THE FEDERAL ANTI-. CYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER v. PROTECTION ACT, 15 U.S.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CASE NO. OF THE FEDERAL ANTI-. CYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER v. PROTECTION ACT, 15 U.S.C. Richard G. McCracken, Bar No. 2748 1 Eric B. Myers, Bar No. 8588 MCCRACKEN, STEMERMAN & HOLSBERRY 2 1630 S. Commerce Street, Suite A-i Las Vegas, NV 89102 3 Phone: (702) 386-5107 Fax: (702) 386-9848 4

More information

1:13-cv TLL-CEB Doc # 1 Filed 07/28/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

1:13-cv TLL-CEB Doc # 1 Filed 07/28/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION 1:13-cv-13231-TLL-CEB Doc # 1 Filed 07/28/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION OUTSIDE LEGAL COUNSEL PLC, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL J. RUBIN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DR. EUNA MCGRUDER Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, JURY

More information

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:10-cv-10098-JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, ) a Delaware Limited Liability Company, )

More information

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 Case: 1:18-cv-03996 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PINK FLOYD (1987) LIMITED, v. Plaintiff, Case

More information

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1 Case 3:14-cv-02220-B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MORRIS & SCHAEFER LEARNING CO., LLC d/b/a LEARNING

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case 5:07-cv-00156-DF-CMC Document 1-1 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ESN, LLC, v. Plaintiff, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

More information

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 Case 2:18-cv-00007 Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION JAMES T. BRADLEY and GARRET LAMBERT, In their

More information

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/12 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Mark G. Tratos (Bar No. ) tratosm@gtlaw.com Peter H. Ajemian (Bar No. ) ajemianp@gtlaw.com GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 00 North Telephone:

More information

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT Case 1:10-cv-10370-RWZ Document 1 Filed 03/02/2010 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TELA INNOVATIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff, TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LIMITED and TSMC NORTH AMERICA, Defendants. C.A. No. JURY

More information

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant. Case :-cv-000-jjt Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 LAW OFF ICES OF VENJ UR IS, P. C. EAS T OSB ORN ROAD PHOE N IX, AR IZONA 0 TE LE PH ONE ( 0 ) -00 FACS IM ILE ( 0 ) E-M AIL DOC KE T IN G@VE N JUR IS.COM

More information

Case 9:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 9:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 Case 9:12-cv-00130-RC Document 1 Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION BRUCE MILSTEAD Plaintiff v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

Case 3:12-cv B Document 1 Filed 07/17/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv B Document 1 Filed 07/17/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Case 3:12-cv-02406-B Document 1 Filed 07/17/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PAPA BERG, INC. and JAMES D. PAPA d/b/a PAPA HAYES MUSIC d/b/a

More information

IC 24-2 ARTICLE 2. TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES, AND TRADE SECRETS

IC 24-2 ARTICLE 2. TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES, AND TRADE SECRETS IC 24-2 ARTICLE 2. TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES, AND TRADE SECRETS IC 24-2-1 Chapter 1. Trademark Act IC 24-2-1-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The following amendments to this chapter

More information

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES /0/ :0 PM CV 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH FREEDOM FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon municipal corporation,

More information

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 1 Filed 05/18/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID#: 1

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 1 Filed 05/18/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID#: 1 Case 3:14-cv-00820-ST Document 1 Filed 05/18/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID#: 1 Leonard R. Berman 4711 SW Huber St., Suite E-3 Portland, OR 97219 (503) 473-8787 OSB # 96040 Easyrabbi@yahoo.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF(S)

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 606 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 53338 ECOPHARM USA, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. RALCO NUTRITION, INC.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO. Filing # 15405805 Electronically Filed 06/30/2014 04:31:04 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE

More information

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217 Case: 1:10-cv-08050 Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217 FIRE 'EM UP, INC., v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GLO SCIENCE, INC. ) a Delaware Corporation ) 10 W 37 th Street, Suite 1001 ) New York, NY 10018 ) ) Civil Action No. Plaintiff,

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-11383 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. WAL BRANDING AND MARKETING,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 22

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 22 Case 1:15-cv-07906 Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 22 Richard Lehv (rlehv@fzlz.com) FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017 Tel: (212) 813-5900 Attorneys for

More information

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:16-cv-02816-JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, JOEL JEROME TUCKER, individually and as an officer

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 Case: 1:17-cv-09154 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 BILLY GOAT IP LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, v. THE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-lab-jma Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 CARLSON LYNCH SWEET KILPELA & CARPENTER, LLP Todd D. Carpenter (CA ) 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, California 0 Telephone:.. Facsimile:.. tcarpenter@carlsonlynch.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION WHIRLPOOL PROPERTIES, INC., WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, and MAYTAG PROPERTIES, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, FILTERS FAST, LLC

More information

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5 Case :-cv-000-mmd-cwh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 00 Las Vegas, NV - 0 W. WEST ALLEN Nevada Bar No.: LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 00 Las Vegas,

More information

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Case 2:14-cv-00892-JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION INDUSTRIAL PRINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC, a Texas

More information

Case 1:18-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2018 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:18-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2018 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:18-cv-22331-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2018 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. -CIV- / MARK PERSON, on behalf of himself and others

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION Case :0-cv-0-FCD-DAD Document Filed /0/0 Page of FRITZ CLAPP, ESQ. (Cal. Bar No. ) Pawali Street Kihei, Maui, HI Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-mail: Attorney for Plaintiff HELLS

More information

Trademark Sublicense Agreement

Trademark Sublicense Agreement Trademark Sublicense Agreement This Trademark Sublicense Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between, a (the "Sublicensor"), and, a (the "Sublicensee"). Sublicensor has entered

More information

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case 1:08-cv-05840 Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) NIKE, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) WAL-MART

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-4987 Jury Trial Demanded PLAINTIFF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC. v. Plaintiff, MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) )

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Judge:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Judge: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VICTORIA S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC., Four Limited Parkway Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 v. Plaintiff, THOMAS PINK

More information

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Case 2:15-cv-00311-MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 APPISTRY, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO.

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. Plaintiff, FORM GIANT, LLC., also known as change-my-address.com and Change My Address, an Ohio Limited Liability Company; and

More information

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: u~em ~L~ of Te~m~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Plaintiff, ClVlL ACTI(~. 0 5 ~ ~ 8 KROGER TEXAS L.P., Defendant.

More information