of a rule nisi, sought by the Applicants and granted by
|
|
- Kimberly Lee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NATAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO. 161/2001 In the matter between: NAUGIS INVESTMENTS CC G N H OFFICE AUTOMATION CC First Applicant Second Applicant and THE KWAZULU- NATAL TENDER BOARD THE MINISTER FOR EDUCATION AND CULTURE KWAZULU-NATAL First Respondent Second Respondent AND OTHERS J U D G M E N T HARPUR AJ. The Applicants were the successful tenderers in respect of two contracts to supply school furniture to the Second Respondent. Paragraph 1( a) of a rule nisi, sought by the Applicants and granted by consent, called upon the Respondents to show cause why an order should not be granted:- " That the decision of the KwaZulu- Natal Tender Board ( First Respondent )
2 taken on 20 th July 2000 to approve of a cancellation of the contracts concluded with the Applicants, be and is hereby set aside." During the hearing before me on the return day the Applicants distilled their case to the proposition that the First Respondent s said decision constituted an administrative action that was fatally defective for want of compliance with the principle of audi alteram partem, ( the audi rule ). They did not persist with the alternative relief sought against the Third Respondent, reasoning that failure of their argument on the relief sought in the main, would be fatal also to the alternative relief. The fourth to fifteenth Respondents were cited as interested parties, and did not oppose. The result was a contest between the Applicants on the one hand and the First and Second Respondents ( the Respondents ) on the other. Both the Applicants and the Respondents relied upon the decision in Cape Metropolitan Council v Metro Inspection Services 2001 (3) SA 1013 ( SCA ) ("Cape"), albeit for different reasons. The Respondents submitted that the decision to cancel the contracts was taken by the Second Respondent, not the First Respondent, and that it was taken as a matter of commerce, not administrative law. In particular they sought to fit their case within the mould of the following passage in Cape: " The Appellant is a public authority and, although it derived its power to enter into the contract with the First Respondent from statute, it derived its
3 power to cancel the contract from the terms of the contract and the common law. Those terms were not prescribed by statute and could not be dictated by the Appellant by virtue of its position as a public authority. They were agreed to by the First Respondent, a very substantial commercial undertaking. The Appellant, when it concluded the contract, was therefore not acting from a position of superiority or authority by virtue of it being a public authority, and, in respect of the cancellation, did not, by virtue of its being a public authority, find itself in a stronger position than the position it would have been in had it been a private institution. When it purported to cancel the contract, it was not performing a public duty or implementing legislation; it was purporting to exercise a contractual right founded on the 1 consensus of the parties in respect of a commercial contract." The Applicants, on the other hand, submitted that the decision to cancel had been taken by the First Respondent, not the Second Respondent, and that in the light, in particular, of the provisions of the KwaZulu- Natal Tender Board Amendment Act No 4 of 1997 (" the Act"), the cancellation of the contracts constituted an administrative action in respect of which there had been no compliance with the audi rule. In order to decide upon the differing contentions it is necessary to have regard to the material facts, including the material terms of the contracts, and also to the relevant provisions of the Act. 1 Cape supra at 1023H-1024A.
4 The material facts are as follows: ( a ) By way of a letter dated the 29 th of December 1999, the Second Respondent gave the First Applicant notice that it had failed to execute orders in terms of the contract with it and it was requested to furnish, within seven working days, reasons why the contract " cannot be cancelled" on the grounds of non- performance. ( b ) A letter from the First Applicant dated 12 th January 2000 followed. In it, the First Applicant sets out the difficulties experienced by it due to the non- availability of Saligna, the specified wood to be used in the manufacture of the school furniture ordered. It concluded by promising timeous completion. I pause to record that it became common cause during the argument before me that whether or not the Applicants were in fact in contractual breach was not a material issue: the issue was one of procedure. ( c ) By way of letters dated 8 th March 2000, the Applicants were requested to address the First Respondent on 16 March 2000 in relation to the question of their performance under the contracts. ( d ) A meeting was held on 16 th March Exactly what was said at that meeting has been the subject of disputes in the papers, none of them material. In any event, the Applicants, to the extent that
5 disputes remain, rely on the Respondents' version, properly construed. ( e ) At the meeting, the Applicants again furnished an explanation for their perceived non- performance. On the Respondents version the upshot was: " The First Respondent resolved that the contracts with the Applicants should continue and that the Applicants be given an opportunity to fulfil their contracts regarding all existing orders until the end of May 2000." 2 ( f ) The final version of the transcript relied upon by the Respondents reveals that the Applicants representative was specifically requested to indicate how long it would take to execute the contracts in full. His response was: " We are looking at least a month and a half to complete because..." He was then pressed for a more definite commitment in the following terms: " Would you be able to execute this contract now with certainty within the next month and a half?" 2 Indexed papers 202/6.10.
6 His response was: " Maximum two months we would be able to complete it." He was then asked the following question: " There won' t be any difficulty in you obtaining timber?" His response was: " Absolutely, unless of course if we have a pattern of rain which we don' t foresee, then that pushes everything else because like I said we were up and running. Unusual rain soaked into the timber and that caused a problem. If there are no rains guaranteed we would get out dry timber delivered to us." 3 On this version, in my view, there was no unconditional commitment. The First Respondent condoned such lapses on behalf of the Applicants that may, up to that time, have occurred and elected to approbate the contracts. ( g ) Thereafter, by way of a letter dated 23 rd June 2000, the Second Respondent complained to the First Respondent that both Applicants " have not delivered furniture to any school or office up until the end 3 Indexed papers/
7 of May 2000." The letter concludes by addressing the First Respondent' s " assistance". 4 ( h ) In a letter dated 21 st July 2000, the First Respondent advised the Second Respondent as follows: "1. Your submission ZNT1267 EC dated 23/6/2000 has reference. 2. The KZN Tender Board at its meeting held on 20 July 2000 approved the termination of contract ZNT1267 EC with Naugis Investments and GNH because they failed to meet the contractual obligation/ obligations. 3. The cancellation of the contract will be advertised in the next issue of the Provincial Gazette. A one week period will be allowed for appeals to be lodged. If no appeals are lodged, your department will be informed accordingly whereafter the items required can be purchased in terms of the procedures in submission as approved by the Tender Board. 4. The department must notify the contractors of the cancellation as soon as possible." 5 ( i ) On 26 July 2000, the Second Respondent addressed separate letters to each of the Applicants in the following terms: "1. The above matter bears reference. 2. Kindly be informed that the KZN Tender Board at its meeting held on 20 July 2000 approved the termination of your contract ZNT1267EC 4 Indexed papers/ Indexed papers/66-67.
8 because you failed to meet the contractual obligations. 3. Your co- operation in this regard will be appreciated." ( j ) Thereafter, the present application was instituted. The material terms of the contracts are as follows: ( a ) In the form of tender : " I/ we hereby tender to supply all or any of the supplies and/ or to render all or any of the services prescribed in the attached document to the KwaZulu- Natal Provincial Administration ( hereafter called " the Province") on the terms and conditions and in accordance with the specifications stipulated in the tender documents, and which will be taken as part of and incorporated into this tender, at the prices and on the terms regarding time for delivery and/ or execution inserted therein." 6 ( b ) The following notes are also of importance: " This tender is subject to the general conditions and procedures of the KwaZulu- Natal Tender Board ( ZNT6)." 7 6 I have numbered each of the pages in the special conditions. The quoted extract appears at page 11, paragraph 1 thereof. 7 12/(x).
9 " If any of the terms and conditions contained in ZNT6 are in conflict with any special conditions, stipulations or provisions incorporated in this tender, such special conditions, stipulations or provisions will apply." 8 ( c ) The general conditions and procedures of the First Respondent ( ZNT6) provide that: ( v ) " A tender is an offer in writing. In terms of this rule, the acceptance of the tender can only be in writing, signed by a duly authorised official of the State 9 and it must be in a letter 10 sent by registered or certified mail" ( v ) " Should the contractor fail to comply with any of the conditions of the contract, the State shall be entitled, without prejudice 11 to any of its other rights to cancel the contract." ( v ) " Upon any delay beyond the contract period in the case of a suppliers contract, the State shall... be entitled... forthwith to cancel the contract and buy such supplies as 12 may be required to complete the contract." 8 12/(xi). 9 I have supplied emphasis to this and other words or passages of particular importance. 10 Clause Clause Clause 38.3.:
10 ( v ) " Board " is defined as meaning the KwaZulu- Natal Tender Board. 13 ( v ) "State" is defined as including government departments of the Republic and any other bodies listed in tender documents as participating bodies. 14 The material provisions in the Act are as follows: (a)the preamble to the Act stipulates that its intention inter alia is to change the procurement system in KwaZulu- Natal and for that purpose to establish a representative and inclusive Tender Board, to create conditions which are conducive to the empowerment of small, medium and micro enterprises, to promote the achievement of equity by measures designed to protect or advance persons or categories of persons disadvantaged by past unfair discrimination, and to create a procurement system which is fair, equitable, transparent, and cost effective, amongst other purposes. (b)section 9(1) of the Act affords the Board, subject to the provisions of the Act and any other law, and acting within the procurement policy of the province, the power 13 Clause Clause This would seem to include the Second Respondent.
11 to procure goods and services for the Province, and stipulates that it may for that purpose: (i)on behalf of the Province, conclude an agreement with a person within or outside the Province or the Republic (Section 9 (1) (a)); (ii)on behalf of the Province resile from any agreement concluded under paragraph 9 (1) (a) and in an appropriate case, claim damages (paragraph 9 (1) (f); and (iii)on such conditions as it may determine, subject to the provisions of sub-section 9 (2) exempt any person with whom an agreement under paragraph 9 (1) (a) has been concluded from compliance with such agreement, or condone the failure of such person to comply with such agreement (section 9(1)(g)); (c)section 9 (6) (a) stipulates that: "If a person has failed to comply with any of the
12 conditions of an agreement, or has performed unsatisfactories [sic] under any agreement... the Board may, in addition to any other legal action it may take - cancel any agreement with that person." (d)section 13 of the Act sets out the underlying values and principles. It stipulates that: "1. In fulfilling its tasks in terms of this Act, the Board and its delegates must - (a) (b) create conditions which are conducive to the empowerment of small, medium and micro enterprises; promote the achievement of equity by measures designed to protect or advance persons or categories of persons disadvantaged by past unfair discrimination; and (c) create a procurement system which is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost effective." During the course of argument, I raised with the Respondents' counsel whether the Respondents had placed anything before the court in relation to the reason why the assistance of the First Respondent was sought at all, if as contended, it was the Second Respondent who had cancelled the contracts. This prompted an application for
13 leave to deliver further affidavits on this topic. The application was opposed. The Applicants' counsel contended that it was too late for this and that the Respondents had already made averments to the contrary in the papers. In this regard, the following statements on behalf of the Respondents are relevant: (e) on 20 July 2000, the First Respondent cancelled the contracts with the Applicants 15 ; (f)"until the decision of the First Respondent on 20 July 2000 which cancelled the agreement with the Applicants is reviewed and set aside..." 16 ; (g) the First Respondent would be entitled to cancel the agreement should the Applicants not comply with the commitment and undertaking." 17 (h)in their account of what happened at the meeting on 16th March 2000, it was stated on behalf of the Respondents that it was the First Respondent who was the active party and the First Respondent who resolved that the contracts with the Applicants should continue. 18 In my view the Respondents have committed themselves to a 15 Indexed papers 143/ Indexed papers / Indexed papers /paragraph Indexed papers/
14 version on oath and ought not to be allowed, particularly at a late stage of the matter, to change tack once they have ascertained where "the shoe pinches" 19. There is no apparent reason why there was no earlier attempt to adduce such further (and contradictory) evidence. I reserved my judgment on the application in order that I would be better placed to decide it after hearing all the arguments. Having now heard the arguments and afforded the matter due consideration, I am of the view that the Respondents application for leave to adduce further affidavits ought to be dismissed, and I make that ruling. It seems to me that the insurmountable obstacle facing the Respondents' submissions is that they do not accord with the facts. Had it been the Second Respondent that had acted independently, on purely contractual grounds, then the passage in Cape relied upon by the Respondents would have applied. The facts here are different, and Cape is distinguishable on that basis. The Second Respondent clearly did enlist the assistance of the First Respondent, to whose authority it deferred. On the facts before me, it was the First Respondent who made the election to cancel on behalf of the Second Respondent, and the Second Respondent who communicated that election to the 19 S v De Jager 1965 (2) SA 612 (A) at 613A-E.
15 Applicants 20. In making that election, it seems overwhelmingly probable, although there is no direct evidence on this point, that the First Respondent did so in terms of its powers under the Act. It could not have done so as a party to the contracts, because it was not one. In this regard it should be remembered that it was the Second Respondent, not the First Respondent, who became the party to the contracts with the Applicants. Acting lawfully, the First Respondent could only have acted in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act, in particular, those set out in section 9 (1) (f) and 9 (6) (a) containing the provisions which empower the First Respondent to cancel an agreement on behalf of the Second Respondent in the event of a failure to comply with any of the conditions of an agreement or in the event of unsatisfactory performance under any agreement. Those provisions provide for the exercise of a public power. 21 It follows that in my view, the Respondents' decision to "approve the cancellation" was in fact an election by it to cancel and that it constituted an "administrative action" requiring compliance with the audi rule. 20 Swart v Vosloo 1965 (1) SA 100 (A) at 105G and 115E - F. 21 Cape supra /20.
16 It was contended by the Respondents, in the alternative, that the meeting of 16 March 2000 and the events which preceded it constituted proper compliance with the audi rule for the purposes of the cancellation. This contention, in my view, has no substance. As I have already indicated, the effect of that meeting was to condone any previous lapses by the Applicants, and to make an election to continue with the contracts. I agree with the Applicants' contention that a fresh opportunity to be heard ought to have been furnished thereafter. From the passages appearing in the final transcript of that meeting, to which I have already referred, it appears that the First Respondent was told that there may be circumstances which would delay further contractual performance. Fresh representations could no doubt have been made in that regard. Questions in relation to nonpayment by the Respondents could also have formed the subject of representations by the Applicants to the First Respondent. Having regard to the underlying values and principles set out in Section 13 of the Act, representations could also have been made on extracontractual grounds, for example the need to create conditions to promote empowerment, or to advance persons previously disadvantaged. These representations might
17 have influenced its decision, if only the Applicants had been given the opportunity to be heard. The point is not so much the substance of the representations that would have been made, but the lack of opportunity to do so. It follows that, in my view, there was a failure in the application of the audi rule by the First Respondent and that the application should succeed. In relation to costs: (a) The Respondents were represented by two counsel and the Applicants were, during some stages in the proceedings (but not during the argument before me), represented by two counsel. No objection was raised on behalf of the Respondents to the Applicants' submission that the costs of two counsel were justified. Rightly so, in a matter of this complexity and importance. (b) I was not addressed in relation to the various costs that were reserved for my decision. It seems to me that these reserved costs should all follow the result.
18 In the result, I make the following order: (a) The decision of the First Respondent taken on 20 July 2000 to approve of a cancellation of the contracts concluded with the Applicants, referred to in the papers, is hereby set aside. (b) The First and Second Respondents are directed to pay the Applicants costs, including those consequent upon the employment of two counsel, where two counsel were employed, and reserved costs. DATED this 18 th day of December HARPUR AJ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No 427/96 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In die matter of: GNH OFFICE AUTOMATION C.C. First Appellant NAUGIS INVESTMENTS C.C. Second Appellant and PROVINCIAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE CIRCUIT COURT, EAST LONDON) BLUE NIGHTINGALE TRADING 397 (PTY) LTD t/a SIYENZA GROUP
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE CIRCUIT COURT, EAST LONDON) REPORTABLE CASE NO. EL881/15 ECD 1681/15 In the matter between: BLUE NIGHTINGALE TRADING 397 (PTY) LTD t/a SIYENZA GROUP Applicant
More informationMEC FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO: CA 337/2013 DATE HEARD: 18/8/14 DATE DELIVERED: 22/8/14 REPORTABLE In the matter between: IKAMVA ARCHITECTS CC APPELLANT and MEC FOR
More information(2 August 2017 to date) PROMOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT 3 OF 2000
(2 August 2017 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 2 August 2017, i.e. the date of commencement of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 8 of 2017 to date] PROMOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA. N$6.20 WINDHOEK - 14 August 2009 No. 4322
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$6.20 WINDHOEK - 14 August 2009 No. 4322 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 167 Promulgation of Electoral Amendment Act, 2009 (Act No. 7 of 2009), of the
More informationLAND RESTITUTION AND REFORM LAWS AMENDMENT ACT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LAND RESTITUTION AND REFORM LAWS AMENDMENT ACT REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA WYSIGINGSWET OP GRONDHERSTEL- EN GRONDHERVORMINGSWETTE No, 1997 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in
More informationPOTPALE INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD NKANYISO PHUMLANI MKHIZE JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG In the matter between: REPORTABLE Case No: 11711/2014 POTPALE INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD Plaintiff And NKANYISO PHUMLANI MKHIZE Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between:- Case No. : 2631/2013 JACQUES VLOK Applicant versus SILVER CREST TRADING 154 (PTY) LTD MERCANTILE BANK LTD ENGEN
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 339/09 MEC FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY Appellant (EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE) and TEMBA MTOKWANA Respondent Neutral citation: 2010) CORAM: MEC v Mtokwana
More informationNotification PART I CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY
[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)] GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION) Notification
More informationRULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE LABOUR COURT. as promulgated by. Government Notice 1665 of 14 October 1996.
RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE LABOUR COURT as promulgated by Government Notice 1665 of 14 October 1996 as amended by Government Notice R961 in Government Gazette 18142 of 11 July 1997 [with
More informationIN THE CONSITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITHEMBILE VALENCIA MKHIZE N.O.
IN THE CONSITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between : CC CASE NO. : CCT 285/2017 SCA CASE NO : 568/2017 KwaZulu-Natal High Court Pietermaritzburg Case No : 2367/2010 SITHEMBILE VALENCIA MKHIZE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) MICHAEL ANDREW VAN AS JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 26 AUGUST 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO: 10589/16 MICHAEL ANDREW VAN AS Applicant And NEDBANK LIMITED Respondent JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 26 AUGUST
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 2494/16 In the matter between: NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS Applicant and GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE SECTORAL
More information(1 May 2008 to date) ELECTRICITY REGULATION ACT 4 OF 2006
(1 May 2008 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 1 May 2008, i.e. the date of commencement of the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act 28 of 2007 - to date] ELECTRICITY REGULATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) Case No.: 1661/2012 Date heard: 15 November 2012 Date delivered: 15 January 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) Case No.: 1661/2012 Date heard: 15 November 2012 Date delivered: 15 January 2013 In the matter between: NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY Case No: 580/11 Date of Hearing: 27.05.2011 Date Delivered: 17.06.2011 In the matter between: BABEREKI CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LIMITED
More informationIN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 6404/11 In the matter between:
IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 6404/11 In the matter between: SOLOMON MNGOMEZULU 1 ST APPLICANT TINDLA ORELIUS MNGOMEZULU 2 ND APPLICANT JABULANI SEVENDAYS
More informationELECTRICITY REGULATIONS FOR COMPULSORY NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR RETICULATION SERVICES (GN R773 in GG of 18 July 2008)
ELECTRICITY REGULATION ACT 4 OF 2006 [ASSENTED TO 27 JUNE 2006] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 AUGUST 2006] (except s. 34: 1 December 2004) (English text signed by the President) as amended by Electricity Regulation
More informationPROMOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT 3 OF 2000
Page 1 of 13 PROMOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT 3 OF 2000 [ASSENTED TO 3 FEBRUARY 2000] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 30 NOVEMBER 2000] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the President)
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$15.20 WINDHOEK - 7 November 2014 No. 5608 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICES No. 227 Amendment of Rules of High Court of Namibia: High Court Act, 1990... 1
More informationRepublic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) JUDGMENT DELIVERED : 3 NOVEMBER 2009
Republic of South Africa REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) CASE No: A 178/09 In the matter between: CHRISTOPHER JAMES BLAIR HUBBARD and GERT MOSTERT Appellant/Defendant
More information08 LC A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
Senate Bill 374 By: Senators Weber of the 40th and Seabaugh of the 28th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 To amend Part 3 of Article 8 of Chapter 14 of Title 44 of the Official Code of Georgia 2 Annotated,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM (PTY) LTD PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED
UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No: 28738/2006 Date heard: 25 & 26 /10/2007 Date of judgment: 12/05/2008 LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM
More information[1] This is an appeal, brought with leave granted by the court a quo
Republic of South Africa In the High Court of South Africa Western Cape High Court, Cape Town CASE NO: A228/2009 MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY SUPERINTENDENT NOEL GRAHAM ZEEMAN PAUL CHRISTIAAN LOUW N.O.
More informationROAD ACCIDENT FUND AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ROAD ACCIDENT FUND AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 75); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 40441 of 24 November
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: JUDGMENT Not reportable Case No: 208/2015 MUTUAL & FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED FIRST APPELLANT AQUA TRANSPORT & PLANT HIRE (PTY)
More information/SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)
/SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) UNREPORTABLE DATE: 15/05/2009 CASE NO: 16198/2008 In the matter between: INITIATIVE SA INVESTMENTS 163 (PTY) LTD APPLICANT
More informationBOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK RECORDS ACCESS POLICY Adopted: May 14, 2002 Amended: December 8, 2015 PREAMBLE In accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the New York State Public Officers
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 70 of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth Year of
More informationJUVE ZIMBA versus THE MINING COMMISSIONER and THE MINISTER OF MINES & MINING DEVELOPMENT and CHARLES CHAROWEDZA
1 JUVE ZIMBA versus THE MINING COMMISSIONER and THE MINISTER OF MINES & MINING DEVELOPMENT and CHARLES CHAROWEDZA HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE MAFUSIRE J HARARE, 13 & 26 October 2015; 13 January 2016 Opposed
More informationGOVERNMENT OF THE SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF FIJI DECREE NO. 7 SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL DECREE, 1991 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
GOVERNMENT OF THE SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF FIJI 1. Short title, commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Establishment of Tribunals 4. Exercise of Tribunals Jurisdiction 5. Times and places of sittings
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES FOR COUNCILLORS
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES FOR COUNCILLORS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 1. LEGISLATIVE 1.1 The Local Government: Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000) 1.2 Rules of Natural Justice 2. PRE-HEARING PROCEDURES
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009
COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Court of Appeal Rules 2009 Arrangement of Rules COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Arrangement of Rules Rule PART I - PRELIMINARY 7 1 Citation and commencement... 7 2 Interpretation....
More informationNHS conditions of contract for the sale of scrap March 2007
NHS conditions of contract for the sale of scrap March 2007 1 Page Interpretation 3 Variation of conditions 3 Specification 3 Samples 4 Disclaimer 4 Property and risk 5 Payment 5 Removal 5 Recovery of
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA /ES (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) D F S FLEMINGO SA (PTY) LTD AIRPORTS COMPANY SOUTH AFRICA LTD JUDGMENT
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA /ES (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) CASE NO: 70057/2009 Date:17/05/2012 NOT REPORTABLE IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: D F S FLEMINGO SA (PTY) LTD APPLICANT AND AIRPORTS COMPANY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DURBAN AND COAST LOCAL DIVISION REPORTABLE 11974/2006. KRISHENLALL HIRALAL APPLICANT versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DURBAN AND COAST LOCAL DIVISION REPORTABLE 11974/2006 KRISHENLALL HIRALAL APPLICANT versus LUGASEN NAICKER FIRST RESPONDENT SHANIKA NAICKER SECOND RESPONDENT RESERVED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION Case No: 14788/07 In the matter between: INYAMEKO TRADING 189 CC T/A MASIYAKHE INDUSTRIES Applicant and THE MINISTER OF EDUCATION
More informationMr V Ramaano Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development CAPE TOWN
4 March 2011 Email: vramaano@parliament.gov.za Mr V Ramaano Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development CAPE TOWN Dear Sir COMMENTS: STATE LIABILITY BILL We attach hereto comments by
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN CORNELIS ANDRONIKUS AUGOUSTIDES N.O.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) Case no: 16920/2016 THE HABITAT COUNCIL Applicant v THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN CORNELIS ANDRONIKUS AUGOUSTIDES N.O. MICHAEL ANDRONIKUS AUGOUSTIDES
More informationLabour Court Rules, 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES PART I
DISTRIBUTED BY VERITAS TRUST Tel: [263] [4] 794478 Fax & Messages [263] [4] 793592 E-mail: veritas@mango.zw VERITAS MAKES EVERY EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PROVISION OF RELIABLE INFORMATION, BUT CANNOT TAKE LEGAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, DURBAN CASE NO: 13338/2008 NHLANHLA AZARIAH GASA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, DURBAN CASE NO: 13338/2008 In the matter between: NHLANHLA AZARIAH GASA Applicant and CAMILLA JANE SINGH N.O. First Respondent ANGELINE S NENHLANHLA GASA
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 6.9.2007 Bill No. 70-C of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth
More informationAct 7 Registration of Business Names Act 2008
ACTS SUPPLEMENT No. 1 10th February, 2009. ACTS SUPPLEMENT to The Southern Sudan Gazette No. 1 Volume I dated 10th February, 2009. Printed by Ministry of Legal Affairs and Constitutional Development, by
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MONEY BILLS AMENDMENT PROCEDURE AND RELATED MATTERS AMENDMENT BILL, 2017
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MONEY BILLS AMENDMENT PROCEDURE AND RELATED MATTERS AMENDMENT BILL, 2017 (As initiated by the Standing Committee on Finance, as a Committee Bill, for introduction in the National
More informationMAINTENANCE AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MAINTENANCE AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 38138 of 29 October 2014)
More informationDepartment of Labor Relations TABLE OF CONTENTS. Connecticut State Labor Relations Act. Article I. Description of Organization and Definitions
Relations TABLE OF CONTENTS Connecticut State Labor Relations Act Article I Description of Organization and Definitions Creation and authority....................... 31-101- 1 Functions.................................
More informationLUXEMBOURG. Enforcing a court decision in Luxembourg in accordance with Brussels I Regulation
LUXEMBOURG Enforcing a court decision in Luxembourg in accordance with Brussels I Regulation Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of
More informationSOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE (PE) RUGBY CLUB JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH Case number: 1159/2016 Date heard: 18/8/16 Date delivered: 20/9/16 Not reportable In the matter between: DESPATCH RUGBY CLUB
More informationTENDER DOCUMENTS PROCUREMENT OF GOODS PRICE QUOTATIONS. Public Procurement Board. Accra, Ghana
TENDER DOCUMENTS PROCUREMENT OF GOODS PRICE QUOTATIONS Public Procurement Board Accra, Ghana October 2003 i Table Contents Table Contents... i Introduction and Instructions... 1 Section I. Invitation for
More informationGovernment Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Vol. 511 Cape Town 17 January 2008 No. 30674 THE PRESIDENCY No. 21 17 January 2008 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act,
More informationFREEDOM OF INFORMATION
LMM(02)6 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION INTRODUCTION 1. Commonwealth Heads of Government at their Durban Meeting in 1999 noted the Commonwealth Freedom of Information Principles, which were endorsed by the Commonwealth
More informationNO. 23 OF 1999: HARMFUL BUSINESS PRACTICES AMENDMENT
Government Gazette 20043 No. 585. 14 May 1999 OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT NO. 23 OF 1999: HARMFUL BUSINESS PRACTICES AMENDMENT It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act which
More informationIn the HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT - PRETORIA) CASE NO /08
57560/08 1 JUDGMENT In the HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT - PRETORIA) CASE NO. 57560/08, DE.LETH WHiCHEYL.fi IS NOT APruCAUU* I (1) REPORTABLE: YESflWtST' (2) O r INTERES1 ro OTHER
More informationHot Dog Café (Pty) Limited Applicant. Daksesh Rowen s Sizzling Dogs CC First Respondent. Judgment
In the KwaZulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg Republic of South Africa Case No : 1783/2011 In the matter between : Hot Dog Café (Pty) Limited Applicant and Daksesh Rowen s Sizzling Dogs CC First Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBELEY) JUDGMENT
Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: 1 YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBELEY) Case No: 183/2013 HEARD ON: 26/08/2014 DELIVERED:
More informationGovernment of Bangladesh MINISTRY OF COMMERCE
Government of Bangladesh MINISTRY OF COMMERCE Rawalpindi, the 10 th September 1963 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 84 of the Trade Marks Act, 1940 (V of 1940), the Government of Bangladesh
More informationACT. This Act may be cited as the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 17) Act, 2005.
DISTRIBUTED BY VERITAS TRUST Tel/fax: [263] [4] 794478. E-mail: veritas@mango.zw Veritas makes every effort to ensure the provision of reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for information
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 41/99 JÜRGEN HARKSEN Appellant versus THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS: CAPE OF GOOD
More informationIN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) APPEAL CASE NO : A5044/09 DATE: 18/08/2010 In the matter between:
IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) APPEAL CASE NO : A5044/09 DATE: 18/08/2010 In the matter between: HENRY GEORGE DAVID COCHRANE Appellant (Respondent a quo) and THE
More informationIN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No. 8774/09 In the matter between: THULANI SIFISO MAZIBUKO AMBROSE SIMPHIWE CEBEKHULU FIRST APPELLANT SECOND APPELLANT
More informationBUSINESS NAMES ACT. Act No. 11,1962.
BUSINESS NAMES ACT. Act No. 11,1962. An Act to make provision with respect to the registration and use of business names; to repeal the Business Names Act, 1934, and certain other enactments; and for purposes
More informationCHAPTER 02:09 ELECTORAL
CHAPTER 02:09 ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION PART I Introductory 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Duties of Secretary 4. Appointment of officers 5. Establishment of polling districts and
More informationGovernment Notices Goewermentskennisgewings
Trade and Industry, Department of/ Handel en Nywerheid, Departement van Broad-Based Black Empowerment Regulations, 0: Invitation for the public to comment on the draft 0 No. 0 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, FEBRUARY
More informationBERMUDA HOTELS (LICENSING AND CONTROL) ACT : 299
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA HOTELS (LICENSING AND CONTROL) ACT 1969 1969 : 299 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 13A 13B 14 15 15A 16 17 18 19 20 21 21A 22 23 24 Interpretation Licence
More informationGeneral Synod Episcopal Standards (Child Protection) Canon 2017 Adopting Ordinance 2017
General Synod Episcopal Standards (Child Protection) Canon 2017 Adopting Ordinance 2017 (Reprinted under the Interpretation Ordinance 1985.) Clause Table of Provisions 1....................... Name 2.......................
More informationPRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ACT 1993
. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ACT 1993 Consolidated version as amended by the following Acts - Electoral Act, 1997 (No. 25) Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2001 (No. 38) Electoral (Amendment) Act 2006 (No. 33) Ministers
More informationPAIA MANUAL: SA UNDERWRITING AGENCIES (PTY) LTD. SA UNDERWRITING AGENCIES (PTY) LTD (Registration No: 1992/03324/07) Hereafter referred to as SAU
Physical: S.A. Underwriters Place, Bond Street Business Park, Randburg Postal: PO Box 3606, Randburg, 2125 Telephone: 011 777 7200 After hours: 0861 727 253 Fax: 011 777 7345 Email: info@saunderwriters.com
More informationSecond Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 9 of 2017
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 82, 7th August, 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No.
More informationTITLE 26 TITLE 26 26:07 PREVIOUS CHAPTER INTEGRATED CIRCUIT LAYOUT-DESIGNS ACT
TITLE 26 Chapter 26:07 TITLE 26 PREVIOUS CHAPTER INTEGRATED CIRCUIT LAYOUT-DESIGNS ACT Act 18/2001. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title. 2. lnterpretation. PART II DESIGNS
More informationGENERAL NOTICE. Notice no. of 2013
GENERAL NOTICE Notice no. of 2013 WILMOT GODFREY JAMES, MP PUBLICATION AND INVITATION TO COMMENT ON THE DRAFT PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE BILL In terms of Rules of 241(1) and 241(2) the National
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION: GRAHAMSTOWN)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION: GRAHAMSTOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO. EL 1544/12 CASE NO. ECD 3561/12 REPORTABLE EVALUATIONS ENHANCED PROPERTY APPRAISALS (PTY)
More informationNATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN LEGION Indianapolis, Indiana May 9-10, 2018
NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN LEGION Indianapolis, Indiana May 9-10, 2018 Resolution No. 34: Changes to the Uniform Code of Procedure for the Revocation, Cancellation or Suspension of Post
More informationGovernment of Orissa Information & Public Relations Department **** NOTIFICATION. No.7307/ I&PR. Bhubaneswar, dated the 6 th March, 2006
Government of Orissa Information & Public Relations Department **** NOTIFICATION No.7307/ I&PR. Bhubaneswar, dated the 6 th March, 2006 In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) of sub-section
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) Plaintiff. Defendant
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE
More informationRepublic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) CASH CRUSADERS FRANCHISING (PTY) LTD
Republic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: Case No: 1052/2013 2970/2013 CASH CRUSADERS FRANCHISING (PTY) LTD Applicant v LUVHOMBA
More informationORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO AMENDING AND RESTATING ORDINANCE NO. 07-247, AS AMENDED, AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 2.80 OF TITLE 2 OF THE MISSION VIEJO MUNICIPAL
More information[1] The above matter came before me on 11 April 2017 by way of urgency.
CASE NO: 20371/2017 (1) (2) (3) REPORT ABLE: YES / NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO REVISED. DATE SIGNATURE In the matter between: THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE NORTHERN PROVINCES Applicant and SIFELANE
More informationGOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT ARTICLE 47. Objective. ARTICLE 48 Scope and coverage. (ii) an international agreement relating to the stationing of troops; and
EFTA GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT ARTICLE 47 Objective In accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, the Parties shall ensure the effective and reciprocal opening of their government procurement markets.
More informationBE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
~ THE PATENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2005 # NO. 15 OF 2005 $ [4th April, 2005] + An Act further to amend the Patents Act, 1970. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as
More informationArbitration Law, Updated to March 2015
Law, 1968- Updated to March 2015 Chapter One: Interpretation 1. For purposes this law - agreement A written agreement to refer to arbitration a dispute which has arisen between the parties to the agreement
More informationKenya Gazette Supplement No nd November, (Legislative Supplement No. 54)
SPECIAL ISSUE 1149 Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 161 2nd November, 2012 (Legislative Supplement No. 54) LEGAL NOTICE NO. 128 Regulations 1 Citation. THE ELECTIONS ACT (No. 24 of 2011) THE ELECTIONS (GENERAL)
More informationCHAPTER 1:04 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY (VALIDITY OF ELECTIONS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
National Assembly (Validity of Elections) 3 CHAPTER 1:04 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY (VALIDITY OF ELECTIONS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Method of questioning validity
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED Plaintiff. ANDRé ALROY FILLIS First Defendant. MARILYN ELSA FILLIS Second Defendant JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NOT REPORTABLE EASTERN CAPE, PORT ELIZABETH Case No.: 1796/10 Date Heard: 3 August 2010 Date Delivered:17 August 2010 In the matter between: FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED Plaintiff
More informationGovernment Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Please note that most Acts are published in English and another South African official language. Currently we only have capacity to publish the English versions. This means that this document will only
More information1. This matter came before me as an application in terms of section 165 of the Labour
166336IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN CASE NUMBER: C146/97 In the matter between: UNICAB TAXIS (PTY) LTD APPLICANT and ANDRIES KAMMIES RESPONDENT JUDGMENT FABER AJ 1. This matter
More informationDr. Nael Bunni, Chairman, Dispute Resolution Panel, Engineers Ireland, 22 Clyde Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4. December 2000.
Preamble This Arbitration Procedure has been prepared by Engineers Ireland principally for use with the Engineers Ireland Conditions of Contract for arbitrations conducted under the Arbitration Acts 1954
More informationLABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL, [Words in bold type indicate omissions from existing enactments]
[Words in bold type indicate omissions from existing enactments] Words underlined indicate insertions in existing enactments BE IT ENACTED by the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa, as follows:
More informationCOMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
In an application to compel between: COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No.: CR162Oct15/ARI187Dec16 WBHO CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Applicant And THE COMPETITION COMMISSION GROUP FIVE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 11/01 IN RE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MPUMALANGA PETITIONS BILL, 2000 Heard on : 16 August 2001 Decided on : 5 October 2001 JUDGMENT LANGA DP: Introduction
More informationTRADING ON NATIONAL ROAD OR IN BUILDING RESTRICTION AREA
CHAPTER 15 TRADING ON NATIONAL ROAD OR IN BUILDING RESTRICTION AREA 15.1 OVERVIEW 2 15.2 AUTHORITY OF THE SANRAL 2 15.3 RESTRICTIONS PLACED ON THE SANRAL 4 15.4 POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IN RESPECT OF ILLEGAL
More information(1 December to date) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996
(1 December 2003 - to date) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996 (Gazette No. 17678, Notice No. 2083 dated 18 December 1996. Commencement date: 4 February 1997 unless otherwise indicated)
More informationCHAPTER 299 FILMS
CHAPTER 299 FILMS 1993-16 This Act came into operation on 14th October, 1993. Amended by: This Act has not been amended Law Revision Orders The following Law Revision Order or Orders authorized the insertion
More informationThe Natural Products Marketing Act
The Natural Products Marketing Act UNEDITED being Chapter N-3 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective February 26, 1979). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, AT DURBAN JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: D477/11 In the matter between:- HOSPERSA First Applicant E. JOB Second Applicant and CHITANE SOZA
More informationThe Patents (Amendment) Act,
!"# The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 1 [NO. 15 OF 2005] CONTENTS [April 4, 2005] Sections Sections 1. Short title and commencement 40. Amendment of Section 57 2. Amendment of Section 2 41. Substitution
More information7 01 THE WORKFORCE GROUP (PTY) (LTD) A...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA Case number 57110/2011 In the matter of THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR THE COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER First Applicant
More informationLAWS OF MALAWI PATENTS CHAPTER 49:02 CURRENT PAGES
PATENTS CHAPTER 49:02 PAGE CURRENT PAGES L.R.O. 1 4 1/1986 5 10 1/1968 11 12 1/1986 13 64 1/1968 65 68 1/1970 69-86 1/1968 87 88 1/1970 89 90 1/1993 91 108 1/1968 109 112 1/1993 112a 1/1993 113 114 1/1968
More information7:12 PREVIOUS CHAPTER
TITLE 7 Chapter 7:12 TITLE 7 PREVIOUS CHAPTER SMALL CLAIMS COURTS ACT Acts 20/1992, 8/1996, 22/2001, 14/2002; S.I. s 134/1996, 136/1996, 158/2000 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short
More information2. Temporary protection of inventions, designs and industrial prototypes Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Patents, Design and Industrial Prototypes Regulations Resolution of the Council of Ministers No.11 of 1993 Regulations to Federal Law No. 44 0f 1992 Regarding the Regulation and Protection
More information