IN THE CONSITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITHEMBILE VALENCIA MKHIZE N.O.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE CONSITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITHEMBILE VALENCIA MKHIZE N.O."

Transcription

1 IN THE CONSITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between : CC CASE NO. : CCT 285/2017 SCA CASE NO : 568/2017 KwaZulu-Natal High Court Pietermaritzburg Case No : 2367/2010 SITHEMBILE VALENCIA MKHIZE N.O. Applicant and PREMIER OF THE PROVINCE OF KWAZULU-NATAL First Respondent MKHANYISENI MBUYAZI Second Respondent UMDENI WENKOSI Third Respondent MEC OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS Fourth Respondent FIRST AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS WRITTEN ARGUMENT

2 P a g e 2 Table of Contents 1. THE ORIGINAL DISPUTE AND THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK THE SCA JUDGMENT SECOND RESPONDENT S APPLICATION ROLE OF THE PREMIER AND THE MEC THE ARGUMENT OF THE PREMIER AND THE MEC IN THIS APPLICATION AND APPEAL CONCLUSION... 26

3 P a g e 3 1. THE ORIGINAL DISPUTE AND THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK 1.1. The original dispute began with the institution of an application for review by Zwelibhekile Sibusisio Mbuyazi (the Removed Inkosi). This application was brought in respect of the removal of the Removed Inkosi and the identification and recognition of Mkhanyiseni Mbuyazi as the Inkosi in his place (the Current Inkosi). This application is contained in Volumes1, 2 and The legal framework in which this application was set was :- Chapter 12 of the Constitution Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 ( The National Act ) 1 Volume 1 : page 1 to Volume 3 : page 200

4 P a g e 4 KwaZulu-Natal Traditional Leadership and Governance Act 5 of 2005 ( The KZN Act ) Of particular relevance to this dispute is the KZN Act. It deals with the customary system of the province which includes the Isilo (the Monarch of KwaZulu- Natal) and the traditional leaders (AmaKhosi and their chosen Izinduna). An Inkosi is a senior traditional leader who has jurisdiction in respect of a traditional community (a recognised clan) and its traditional council A traditional council is contemplated to govern together with a municipality and it is supported by the Provincial Government Section 19 of the KZN Act deals with Recognition of an Inkosi. The core of this section deals with the identification of the person to be the Inkosi by the Umndeni Wenkosi ( the immediate relatives of an Inkosi as defined), followed by the recognition of

5 P a g e 5 the Inkosi by the Premier. Once recognised the Inkosi s appointment is proclaimed by notice in the Provincial Gazette The constitutional principles set out in Section 3 must be applied; otherwise the customary law is applied The Inkosi s role is to carry out customary functions within the context of Zulu culture, history and tradition. The Inkosi has a law and order function and a governance function in the interests of his or her traditional community. (Section 20) An Inkosi may be removed from office for misconduct or wrongful appointment or recognition in terms of Section 21 of the KZN Act It follows that the office of an Inkosi is extremely important and the functions performed are essential for the well-being of a community. 2 See Umndeni (Clan) of Amantungwa and Others v The MEC for Housing and Traditional Affairs and another [2011] 2 All SA 548 (SCA)

6 P a g e In the original application the former Premier of KwaZulu-Natal explains the background to the matter (from page 48 of Volume 1) He explains that although the Department (the Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs) administers matters it is the Premier (in Executive Council of the Province) who performs the acts referred to in Section 19. The Department was advised that the Umndeni Wenkosi had identified the Removed Inkosi as the successor to the Inkosi who had died. This, had, according to him, not been done in accordance with customary law, customs or processes and in due course there was a request from the Umndeni Wenkosi for the Premier to appoint the Current Inkosi, who was the person identified by Umndeni Wenkosi.

7 P a g e The matter was put on hold and referred back to Umndeni Wenkosi as contemplated by Section 19 (4) of the KZN Act A facilitator (Professor Mathenjwa) was used to determine the identification of the Umndeni Wenkosi The facilitator reported that the wrong person had been appointed according to the Umndeni Wenkosi and that the properly identified person was the Current Inkosi The Premier (in Executive Council) then determined that the recognition had been done wrongfully and took the decision to remove the Removed Inkosi and recognise the Current Inkosi These decisions were processed The Removed Inkosi instituted a review with interim relief on March 2010 and on 11 th May 2010 the High

8 P a g e 8 Court granted interim relief reinstating the Removed Inkosi as Inkosi This caused an inflammatory situation and the Premier and the MEC brought an interlocutory application to amend the interim relief At a hearing on the 26 th May 2010 the interim relief was amended and the following order made in this respect :- 4. Pending the final determination of the application for the said review and to operate as an interim order forthwith :- 4.1 First Respondent is granted leave and directed to appoint an appropriate person to function in the interim as Imbambabukhosi (which person shall not be the Applicant or the Second Respondent) until such time as an Inkosi has been recognised and appointed as contemplated in terms of Section 3 of the KwaZulu-Natal Traditional Leadership and Government Act No 5 of Volume 1 : Pages Volume 2 : Pages 70-83

9 P a g e Applicant and Second Respondent are interdicted and restrained from attempting to, or taking office, as the Inkosi of the Mbuyazi Traditional Community It was recorded that the review should be heard as a matter of urgency The matter was argued on 23 rd September 2010 before Van Zyl J who handed down judgment on 7 th June 2011, in which he referred to the matter for trial retaining the interim arrangements set out in 1.19 above The Removed Inkosi then brought the Funding Application in order to allow his litigation costs to be funded by money held by the Mbonambi Community Development Trust. 7 5 Volume 1 : pages Volume 3 : pages Volume 3 : pages

10 P a g e After the Funding Application was argued but before judgment the Removed Inkosi died. He died on 7 th July Thereafter the Current Inkosi, the Premier and the Applicant sought relief to direct how the death of the Removed Inkosi had affected the proceedings These applications were heard by Booyens AJ who delivered a written judgment on 9 th July In this judgment it was held that :- a) The death of the Removed Inkosi put an end to the review which was personal to him; b) Section 19 of the KZN Act makes it clear that procedures must be adhered to before a person can be identified to assume the position of Inkosi; 8 Volume 4 : page Volume 5 : page

11 P a g e 11 c) Any appointments or removals are administrative action which can be challenged on review in terms of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 ( PAJA ) Consequently the Applicant (as Executrix) and the minor child, Phatokuhle, had no claim in the proceedings and could not be substituted therein Applicant took this judgment on appeal to the SCA It is common cause that the decisions made under Section 19 and 21 of the KZN Act are administrative action under PAJA. This is also the established law The decisions to remove the Removed Inkosi and to appoint the Current Inkosi are both administrative 10 Bapedi Marota Mamone v The Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims 2015 (3) BCLR 268 (CC) at paras

12 P a g e 12 decisions which remain valid and they retain lawful consequence until set aside on review THE SCA JUDGMENT 2.1. The Applicant took the matter on appeal to the SCA. The judgment is part of the record The key aspects of this judgment are : The Removed Inkosi s claim in the Review; that his removal be set aside and that the appointment of the Current Inkosi be set aside, were personal to him and were not transmissible to anyone else (para 12) Since his death any order in the review cannot be made (para 12) Those claims can no longer be made after his death. They terminated with his death. 11 MEC for Health, Eastern Cape v Kirland Investments 2014 (3) SA 481 (CC) at paras Volume 6 : pages

13 P a g e 13 Nor could it be ceded and it is not transmissible to his heirs. It follows that his wife cannot be substituted in the review application (para 12) The same applies to the Applicant s application to be substituted for the Removed Inkosi in her capacity as mother and guardian of Phathokuhle. He (Phathokuhle) does not have a claim to be appointed as Inkosi on the papers because of the procedures set out in the Act (Section 19) (para 13) Even if the Removed Inkosi s claim for reinstatement is not transmissible on his death, Phathokuhle may still have a claim subject to the process under Section 19, his position as the eldest son, and subject to any constitutional development within the

14 P a g e 14 Mbuyazi Community in terms of Section 3 of the Act. He, therefore, has a right to be considered if it is proved that the Deceased was wrongly removed (para 14 and 15) The Applicant as the Executrix has a good claim to be substituted in respect of the monetary claim. This is a separate claim to reinstatement and is in the form of damages claimable by the estate. She is therefore substituted for the purposes of this claim. As a matter of convenience the matter should proceed to oral evidence as directly by Van Zyl J so that the matter of the rightful successor may be settled as soon as possible (para 16 and 17).

15 P a g e The funding application before Henriques J should now be finalised with the Executrix substituted for the Deceased (para 18) The SCA order is at page 440 of the Record (Volume 6) The fundamental flaw in this judgment is that the decisions of the Premier stand until set aside. The pursuing of the monetary claim will not set aside the appointment of the Current Inkosi, which will stand until set aside on review There is no person who can bring this review nor are there any grounds on which to bring it All the parties appeared to be confused as to the rights of the parties and the Premier and the Applicant both sought leave to appeal to the

16 P a g e 16 Constitutional Court for leave to appeal. These applications were refused The difficulty for the Premier and the MEC was that the SCA ordered that the interim relief should remain in place This rendered the community without an Inkosi and without governance for the foreseeable future while all the litigation was finalised. The difficulties that have arisen therefrom are set out in the answering affidavit filed in the application for leave to appeal It is noted that the community has been without an Inkosi since May 2010 and the interim order confirmed by the SCA will continue indefinitely. 13 Volume 6 : pages Volume 10 : paras 6 24 : pages

17 P a g e All attempts to settle the issue of an interim traditional leader have met with intransigence from both parties Applicant has now instituted an action : Riding on the back of the findings in the SCA judgment, Applicant (representing Phathokuhle) has brought an action on his behalf only for :- a) an order that consolidates the action with the Review; b) that if the withdrawal of the Removed Inkosi s recognition is set aside, that the Umndeni Wenkosi must meet within thirty days to identify a successor (and if necessary, an ibambabukhosi). 15 Volume 7 : para : pages

18 P a g e 18 c) Costs This order is based on the following cause of action : Phathokuhle is the eldest son of the Removed Inkosi; The withdrawal of the recognition of the Removed Inkosi was unlawful, incorrect and has been referred for determination by trial in Case No. 2367/2010; If an order is granted setting aside the said withdrawal Phathokuhle has a right to be considered by the Umndeni Wenkosi Again the fundamental flaw to this course of action is that the decision to appoint the Current Inkosi will still be extant and enforceable.

19 P a g e The issues referred to trial by Van Zyl J 16 no longer existed because the Applicant (and prospective Plaintiff) had died. All that remained was the monetary claim in which the Applicant was substituted as the Plaintiff. This would leave the administrative decision to appoint the Current Inkosi intact, rendering the theory and the practicalities unaligned, because the issue of the proper Inkosi had not been referred to trial Second Respondent then approached the High Court for an order which had the effect of rescinding the order of Van Zyl J and the interim relief. 3. SECOND RESPONDENT S APPLICATION 3.1. This was heard by Sishi J who delivered judgment thereon In the application the Court was asked to grant relief which Applicant contends would have ended her 16 Volume 3 : pages Volume 7 : pages

20 P a g e 20 son s succession rights altogether. The orders prayed were to : rescind the referral to trial of the wrongful removal claim; uplift the rule nisi The Court approached its task in attempting to interpret the SCA Judgment The finding that the position of the Current Inkosi was unassailable was based on the SCA finding that no other person but the deceased could bring a review of the Premier s decision to appoint him This is the fundamental issue referred to above It is clear from the judgment of the Court a quo that it was dealing with the SCA judgment and the consequential facts which then followed. In the 18 Volume 7 : page 592 : para 32.

21 P a g e 21 factual circumstances that then applied the Court a quo concluded that the litigation was at an end and that there was no longer any point to the trial about who should be Inkosi because no-one was substituted for the Removed Inkosi in the trial. The Applicant was only entitled to her monetary claim In the event of the Court a quo s approach being found to be wrong and being set aside, the Premier and the MEC nevertheless contend that in the exercise of the discretion of the appellate court that the rule nisi should be discharged in order that the Current Inkosi may function until the litigation is at an end. 4. ROLE OF THE PREMIER AND THE MEC 4.1. The Premier set out his stance to the Removed Inkosi s application at the outset. 19 This was that he 19 Volume 1 : page 49-50

22 P a g e 22 abided the decision in respect of who was the person entitled to be the Inkosi of the community The MEC (with the concurrence of the Premier) approached the High Court when the first order was granted in order to ensure that the community had a functional Inkosi. 20 She noted that the application would from then be opposed for the reasons set out Once the Removed Inkosi had died the Premier brought an application to have Removed Inkosi s application finalised. This stance persisted until the SCA heard and decided the matter When leave to appeal was made to the above Honourable Court the Premier and the MEC noted that the issue of community governance had assumed prominence Volume 1 : page Volume 6 : paras : pages

23 P a g e In Second Respondents application heard before Sishi J the Premier and the MEC abided the decision of the court and made submissions on the issues of law Thereafter the deponents for the Premier and the MEC stated that the issue of the correct Inkosi was a matter for the community but that they would be taking an active part in the litigation in order to see it finalised and bring an end to the vacuum of authority in the community This stance has persisted throughout since then THE ARGUMENT OF THE PREMIER AND THE MEC IN THIS APPLICATION AND APPEAL 5.1. Since the beginning of 2010 when the succession dispute first started the Mbuyazi Community have had no functioning Inkosi. 22 Volume 7 : para 22 : pages Volume 8 : 24 Volume 9 : paras : pages

24 P a g e This has had a detrimental effect on the governance of the Community who have become two factions The Current Inkosi has been duly appointed and were it not for the SCA ordering the continuation of the rule nisi preventing him from functioning, he is an adult and could function as the Inkosi The facts are set out in the answering affidavit of the Premier and the MEC. These are, it is submitted, compelling factors to motivate the rescinding of the rule nisi. These facts were present at the SCA hearing but were not argued because this issue did not arise These facts have become more pressing and have exacerbated the situation since November 2014 when the SCA handed down judgment Essentially the Premier and the MEC argue for the stability of a functioning Inkosi pending whatever

25 P a g e 25 other legal challenges may follow. These may take another decade to resolve and the Community should be governed until then A neutral person would not be appropriate because he or she would be acceptable to neither faction Even if this Constitutional Court upholds the appeal it is submitted that the rule nisi could be rescinded on the basis of changed circumstances or as an exercise of the Court s discretion in deciding the appeal Principles of convenience and the interests of justice may dictate that the challenger should go through the litigation in order to attempt to have a claim recognised, but in the interim the Inkosi who was appointed by the Premier should function as the Inkosi in the meantime.

26 P a g e It does not follow that neither persons should function as Inkosi while the litigation is being conducted. 6. CONCLUSION In the premises the Premier and the MEC will argue accordingly. No order of costs is sought from any party by the Premier or the MEC. DATED at PIETERMARITZBURG on this 16 th day of MAY A. J. DICKSON SC 1 st & 4 th Respondents Counsel

27 P a g e 27 IN THE CONSITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between : CC CASE NO. : CCT 285/2017 SCA CASE NO : 568/2017 KwaZulu-Natal High Court Pietermaritzburg Case No : 2367/2010 SITHEMBILE VALENCIA MKHIZE N.O. Applicant and PREMIER OF THE PROVINCE OF KWAZULU-NATAL First Respondent MKHANYISENI MBUYAZI Second Respondent UMDENI WENKOSI Third Respondent MEC OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS Fourth Respondent FIRST AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS TABLE OF CASES

28 P a g e 28 Cases Bapedi Marota Mamone v The Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims 2015 (3) BCLR 268 (CC) MEC for Health, Eastern Cape v Kirland Investments 2014 (3) SA 481 (CC) 11 Umndeni (Clan) of Amantungwa and Others v The MEC for Housing and Traditional Affairs and another [2011] 2 All SA 548 (SCA)... 5 C:\Users\Advocate Dickson\Documents\2018\2018 Pleadings\COGTA\Valenciamkhize\1&4WA Docx

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 6404/11 In the matter between:

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 6404/11 In the matter between: IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 6404/11 In the matter between: SOLOMON MNGOMEZULU 1 ST APPLICANT TINDLA ORELIUS MNGOMEZULU 2 ND APPLICANT JABULANI SEVENDAYS

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, DURBAN CASE NO: 13338/2008 NHLANHLA AZARIAH GASA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, DURBAN CASE NO: 13338/2008 NHLANHLA AZARIAH GASA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, DURBAN CASE NO: 13338/2008 In the matter between: NHLANHLA AZARIAH GASA Applicant and CAMILLA JANE SINGH N.O. First Respondent ANGELINE S NENHLANHLA GASA

More information

ABSA BANK LTD v MOKEBE AND RELATED CASES 2018 (6) SA 492 (GJ) CIPLA AGRIMED (PTY) LTD v MERCK SHARP DOHME CORPORATION AND OTHERS 2018 (6) SA 440 (SCA)

ABSA BANK LTD v MOKEBE AND RELATED CASES 2018 (6) SA 492 (GJ) CIPLA AGRIMED (PTY) LTD v MERCK SHARP DOHME CORPORATION AND OTHERS 2018 (6) SA 440 (SCA) CIVIL LAW UPDATES DECEMBER 2018 INDEX CASE NAMES SUBJECT INDEX CASES CASE NAMES ABSA BANK LTD v MOKEBE AND RELATED CASES 2018 (6) SA 492 (GJ) CIPLA AGRIMED (PTY) LTD v MERCK SHARP DOHME CORPORATION AND

More information

THE PREMIER OF THE EASTERN CAPE

THE PREMIER OF THE EASTERN CAPE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BHISHO) CASE NO. 14/2014 Reportable Yes / No In the matter between: THE PREMIER OF THE EASTERN CAPE First Appellant THE MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TSHIVHULANA ROYAL FAMILY NDITSHENI NORMAN NETSHIVHULANA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TSHIVHULANA ROYAL FAMILY NDITSHENI NORMAN NETSHIVHULANA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 48/16 TSHIVHULANA ROYAL FAMILY Applicant and NDITSHENI NORMAN NETSHIVHULANA Respondent Neutral citation: Tshivhulana Royal Family v

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWA-ZULU NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWA-ZULU NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWA-ZULU NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN In the matter between: CASE NO.: 11174/15 NAYESAN REDDY Applicant And LERENDAREN REDDY SHERIFF OF THE COURT, DURBAN COASTAL SHERIFF

More information

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 2494/16 In the matter between: NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS Applicant and GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE SECTORAL

More information

KINGDOM CATERERS (KZN) (PTY) LTD

KINGDOM CATERERS (KZN) (PTY) LTD IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NATAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO: 8155/07 In the matter between: KINGDOM CATERERS (KZN) (PTY) LTD Applicant and THE BID APPEALS TRIBUNAL First Respondent THE CHAIRPERSON

More information

of a rule nisi, sought by the Applicants and granted by

of a rule nisi, sought by the Applicants and granted by IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NATAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO. 161/2001 In the matter between: NAUGIS INVESTMENTS CC G N H OFFICE AUTOMATION CC First Applicant Second Applicant and THE KWAZULU- NATAL

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT MANONG & ASSOCIATES (PTY) LTD. EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE 1 st Respondent NATIONAL TREASURY

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT MANONG & ASSOCIATES (PTY) LTD. EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE 1 st Respondent NATIONAL TREASURY THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 331/08 MANONG & ASSOCIATES (PTY) LTD Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF ROADS & TRANSPORT, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE 1 st Respondent NATIONAL

More information

RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE LABOUR COURT. as promulgated by. Government Notice 1665 of 14 October 1996.

RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE LABOUR COURT. as promulgated by. Government Notice 1665 of 14 October 1996. RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE LABOUR COURT as promulgated by Government Notice 1665 of 14 October 1996 as amended by Government Notice R961 in Government Gazette 18142 of 11 July 1997 [with

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG ANDREW LESIBA SHABALALA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG ANDREW LESIBA SHABALALA Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG In the

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 339/09 MEC FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY Appellant (EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE) and TEMBA MTOKWANA Respondent Neutral citation: 2010) CORAM: MEC v Mtokwana

More information

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT BARBERTON MINES (PTY) LTD

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT BARBERTON MINES (PTY) LTD IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J1780/14 In the matter between: BARBERTON MINES (PTY) LTD Applicant and ASSOCIATION OF MINEWORKERS AND CONSTRUCTION UNION

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL AUTHORITIES PENSION FUND

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL AUTHORITIES PENSION FUND THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: 994/2013 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL AUTHORITIES PENSION FUND APPELLANT and MSUNDUZI MUNICIPALITY RESPONDENT Neutral

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JABULANI ZULU AND 389 OTHERS

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JABULANI ZULU AND 389 OTHERS CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 108/13 JABULANI ZULU AND 389 OTHERS Appellants and ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY MINISTER OF POLICE MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR HUMAN

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG In the matter between: CASE NO: 9234/15 MARTIN BRUCE RENKEN IM A RENT COLLECTOR (PTY) LTD FIRST APPLICANT SECOND APPLICANT and

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO:83409/2015 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... DATE

More information

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 11700/2011 In the matter between: THABO PUTINI APPLICANT and EDUMBE MUNICIPALITY RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Delivered on 15 May 2012 SWAIN

More information

Mr V Ramaano Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development CAPE TOWN

Mr V Ramaano Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development CAPE TOWN 4 March 2011 Email: vramaano@parliament.gov.za Mr V Ramaano Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development CAPE TOWN Dear Sir COMMENTS: STATE LIABILITY BILL We attach hereto comments by

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J1982/2013 In the matter between: NUMSA obo MEMBERS Applicant And MURRAY AND ROBERTS PROJECTS First

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 162/13 MPISANE ERIC NXUMALO Applicant and PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMMISSION ON TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 53/05 HELICOPTER & MARINE SERVICES THE HUEY EXTREME CLUB First Applicant Second Applicant and V & A WATERFRONT PROPERTIES VICTORIA & ALFRED WATERFRONT SOUTH

More information

HELD AT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: J1794/2010 THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT

HELD AT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: J1794/2010 THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: J1794/2010 In the matter between: POPCRU Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Respondent JUDGMENT FRANCIS J 1. The applicant,

More information

known as plot number 13 Glynham, Masvingo ( the property ). It formed part of the estate

known as plot number 13 Glynham, Masvingo ( the property ). It formed part of the estate 1 DISTRIBUTABLE (29) ALFRED MUCHINI v (1) ELIZABETH MARY ADAMS (2) SHEPHERD MAKONYERE N.O (3) ESTATE LATE ALVIN ROY ADAMS (4) REGISTRAR OF DEEDS (5) MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT SUPREME COURT OF ZIMBABWE ZIYAMBI

More information

JUDGMENT. [1] The matter serves before me consequent upon an appeal judgment and order

JUDGMENT. [1] The matter serves before me consequent upon an appeal judgment and order NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION MTHATHA Case No: 3412/2017 Date Heard: 1/02/2018 Date Delivered: 27/02/18 In the matter between: NOMKHITHA NTANTANA Applicant

More information

NONTSAPO GETRUDE BANGANI THE LAND REFORM THE REGIONAL LAND CLAIMS COMMISSION FULL BENCH APPEAL JUDGMENT

NONTSAPO GETRUDE BANGANI THE LAND REFORM THE REGIONAL LAND CLAIMS COMMISSION FULL BENCH APPEAL JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION) APPEAL CASE NO. CA25/2016 Reportable Yes / No In the matter between: NONTSAPO GETRUDE BANGANI Appellant and THE MINISTER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND

More information

Jennifer Ann van den Berg. Jan Albert Jacobus van den Berg. JUDGMENT Delivered on 17 July 2013

Jennifer Ann van den Berg. Jan Albert Jacobus van den Berg. JUDGMENT Delivered on 17 July 2013 IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matters of: CASE NO. 10598/12 Brian Lambert Kurz N.O. Mark John Perrow N.O. First Applicant Second Applicant and Jennifer

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 11/01 IN RE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MPUMALANGA PETITIONS BILL, 2000 Heard on : 16 August 2001 Decided on : 5 October 2001 JUDGMENT LANGA DP: Introduction

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,

More information

METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO: 611/2017 Date heard: 02 November 2017 Date delivered: 05 December 2017 In the matter between: NEO MOERANE First Applicant VUYANI

More information

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not reportable Case no: J1529/15 BONGA BLADWIN MAJOLA Applicant and MEC FOR ROADS & TRANSPORT: GAUTENG PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT First Respondent HOD FOR ROADS

More information

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Lampac CC t/a Packaging World. John Henry Hawkey N.O.

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Lampac CC t/a Packaging World. John Henry Hawkey N.O. IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 17047/2009 In the matter between Lampac CC t/a Packaging World Applicant and John Henry Hawkey N.O. First Respondent John Dua Attorneys

More information

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Reportable CASE NO: J20/2010 In the matter between: MOHLOPI PHILLEMON MAPULANE Applicant and MADIBENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY First Respondent ADV VAN

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN CORNELIS ANDRONIKUS AUGOUSTIDES N.O.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN CORNELIS ANDRONIKUS AUGOUSTIDES N.O. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) Case no: 16920/2016 THE HABITAT COUNCIL Applicant v THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN CORNELIS ANDRONIKUS AUGOUSTIDES N.O. MICHAEL ANDRONIKUS AUGOUSTIDES

More information

OBO RICHARD CHARLES MATOLA MBOMBELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

OBO RICHARD CHARLES MATOLA MBOMBELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: J2566/14 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION OBO RICHARD CHARLES MATOLA Applicant

More information

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) Arbitration Act. No. 11 of 1995 1 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) L.D. O.10/93

More information

/SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)

/SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) 1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE:

More information

REFUGEES ACT 130 OF 1998

REFUGEES ACT 130 OF 1998 REFUGEES ACT 130 OF 1998 [ASSENTED TO 20 NOVEMBER 1998] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 APRIL 2000] (English text signed by the President) as amended by 1 Refugees Amendment Act 33 of 2008 [with effect from a

More information

HEARD ON: 15 November 1995 DELIVERED ON: 29 November 1995 JUDGMENT. [1] MAHOMED DP. The First Applicant, who is the Premier of KwaZulu-Natal, seeks an

HEARD ON: 15 November 1995 DELIVERED ON: 29 November 1995 JUDGMENT. [1] MAHOMED DP. The First Applicant, who is the Premier of KwaZulu-Natal, seeks an IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. CCT 36/95 In the matter between: THE PREMIER OF KWAZULU-NATAL THE MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR FINANCE, AUXILIARY SERVICES AND PUBLIC WORKS (KWAZULU-NATAL)

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 38/04 RADIO PRETORIA Applicant versus THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY OF SOUTH AFRICA THE INDEPENDENT COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 179/16 MAMAHULE COMMUNAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATION MAMAHULE COMMUNITY MAMAHULE TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY OCCUPIERS OF THE FARM KALKFONTEIN First

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA 1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA DELETE WHICH IS NOT APPLICABLE [1] REPORTABLE: YES / NO [2] OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES / NO [3] REVISED DATE SIGNATURE

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 41/99 JÜRGEN HARKSEN Appellant versus THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS: CAPE OF GOOD

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA MINISTER OF HEALTH AND OTHERS TREATMENT ACTION CAMPAIGN AND OTHERS JUDGMENT

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA MINISTER OF HEALTH AND OTHERS TREATMENT ACTION CAMPAIGN AND OTHERS JUDGMENT CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 9/02 MINISTER OF HEALTH AND OTHERS Appellants versus TREATMENT ACTION CAMPAIGN AND OTHERS Respondents Heard on : 3 April 2002 Decided on : 4 April 2002 Reasons

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. JOHN BUTI MATLADI on behalf of the MATLADI FAMILY

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. JOHN BUTI MATLADI on behalf of the MATLADI FAMILY CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 42/13 [2013] ZACC 21 In the matter between: JOHN BUTI MATLADI on behalf of the MATLADI FAMILY Applicant and GREATER TUBATSE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY ANGLORAND HOLDINGS

More information

HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN

HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN Reportable Delivered 180211 Edited 280311 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN CASE NO J253/11 In the matter between: CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY 1 ST APPLICANT JOHANNESBURG

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) Case No: 8550/09 Date heard: 06/08/2009 Date of judgment: 11/08/2009 In the matter between: Pikoli, Vusumzi Patrick Applicant and The President

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GADDIEL MUTAMBA MUBENISHIBWA MULOWAYI. Neutral citation: Mulowayi v Minister of Home Affairs [2019] ZACC 1

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GADDIEL MUTAMBA MUBENISHIBWA MULOWAYI. Neutral citation: Mulowayi v Minister of Home Affairs [2019] ZACC 1 CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 249/18 FLORETTE KAYAMBA MULOWAYI NSONGONI JACQUES MULOWAYI GADDIEL MUTAMBA MUBENISHIBWA MULOWAYI First Applicant Second Applicant Third

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley) Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES/ NO YES/ NO YES/ NO YES/ NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley) CASE

More information

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) JOHANNESBURG CITY PARKS ADVOCATE JAFTA MPHAHLANI N.O.

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) JOHANNESBURG CITY PARKS ADVOCATE JAFTA MPHAHLANI N.O. THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) In the matter between: CASE NO. JR 1028/06 JOHANNESBURG CITY PARKS Applicant And ADVOCATE JAFTA MPHAHLANI N.O. THE SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT

More information

CAPE KILLARNEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD v MAHAMBA AND OTHERS 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Vivier Adcj, Howie JA and Brand AJA

CAPE KILLARNEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD v MAHAMBA AND OTHERS 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Vivier Adcj, Howie JA and Brand AJA CAPE KILLARNEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD v MAHAMBA AND OTHERS 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Citation Case No 495/99 Court Judge 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Supreme Court of Appeal Heard August 28, 2001 Vivier

More information

(2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: ES/ NO [lf};jj_ JUDGMENT. 1 SSG Security Solutions (Pty) Limited (SSG) and the second

(2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: ES/ NO [lf};jj_ JUDGMENT. 1 SSG Security Solutions (Pty) Limited (SSG) and the second IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: 67027/17 In the matter between: SSG SECURITY SOLUTIONS (PTY) LIMITED Applicant (1) REPORTABLE: ES/ NO and (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 26/2000 PERMANENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EASTERN CAPE MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION, EASTERN CAPE First Applicant Second

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. ethekwini MUNICIPALITY

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. ethekwini MUNICIPALITY THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: 1068/2016 In the matter between: ethekwini MUNICIPALITY APPELLANT and MOUNTHAVEN (PTY) LTD RESPONDENT Neutral citation: ethekwini

More information

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: J 965/18 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION ( SAMWU ) Applicant and MXOLISI QINA MILTON MYOLWA SIVIWE

More information

Republic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)

Republic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) Republic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) Case no: 15493/2014 NICOLENE HANEKOM APPLICANT v LIZETTE VOIGT N.O. LIZETTE VOIGT JANENE GERTRUIDA GOOSEN N.O.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG Case No.: AR215/08 In the matter between:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG Case No.: AR215/08 In the matter between: REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG Case No.: AR215/08 In the matter between: HOPEWELL NYAMAKAZI APPLICANT and THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS KWAZULU-NATAL

More information

THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS JUDGMENT

THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, PORT ELIZABETH Case No.: 3414/2010 Date Heard: 9 February 2012 Date Delivered: 16-02-2012 In the matter between: JANNATU ALAM Plaintiff and THE MINISTER

More information

MALITABA REBECCA PHOKONTSI LIKELELI ELIZABETH SEBOLAI

MALITABA REBECCA PHOKONTSI LIKELELI ELIZABETH SEBOLAI FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between: MALITABA REBECCA PHOKONTSI LIKELELI ELIZABETH SEBOLAI Case No.: A199/2009 1 st Appellant 2 nd Appellant and KHATSE EVELYN

More information

NELSON MANDELA BAY MUNICIPALITY JUDGMENT. [1] At issue in this application is whether a fixed contract of

NELSON MANDELA BAY MUNICIPALITY JUDGMENT. [1] At issue in this application is whether a fixed contract of IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION PORT ELIZABETH Case No: 1479/14 In the matter between NELSON MANDELA BAY MUNICIPALITY Applicant and ISRAEL TSATSIRE Respondent JUDGMENT REVELAS

More information

THE COMPETITION APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (SITTING IN CAPE TOWN)

THE COMPETITION APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (SITTING IN CAPE TOWN) THE COMPETITION APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (SITTING IN CAPE TOWN) In the matter between 139/CAC/Feb16 GROUP FIVE LTD APPELLANT and THE COMPETITION COMMISSION FIRST RESPONDENT Coram: DAVIS JP, ROGERS

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TRONOX KZN SANDS (PTY) LIMITED

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TRONOX KZN SANDS (PTY) LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 114/15 TRONOX KZN SANDS (PTY) LIMITED Applicant and KWAZULU-NATAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL MTUNZINI CONSERVANCY MTUNZINI

More information

MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT. [1] In accordance to an agreement which was reached between the

MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT. [1] In accordance to an agreement which was reached between the Not Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION PORT ELIZABETH In the matter between: Case No: 3509/2012 Date Heard: 15/08/2016 Date Delivered: 1/09/2016 ANDILE SILATHA Plaintiff

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA THE SOCIETY OF ADVOCATES OF NATAL

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA THE SOCIETY OF ADVOCATES OF NATAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 2/98 JOAQUIM AUGUSTO DE FREITAS INDEPENDENT ASSOCIATION OF ADVOCATES OF SOUTH AFRICA First Applicant Second Applicant versus THE SOCIETY OF ADVOCATES OF NATAL

More information

MINYUKU TSAKANI YVETTE MINYUKU TINYIKO ROSE MINYUKU MUHLURI MINYUKU HLEKANI ROSE MASTER OF LIMPOPO HIGH COURT, THOHOYANDOU

MINYUKU TSAKANI YVETTE MINYUKU TINYIKO ROSE MINYUKU MUHLURI MINYUKU HLEKANI ROSE MASTER OF LIMPOPO HIGH COURT, THOHOYANDOU IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (LIMPOPO HIGH COURT, THOHOYANDOU) In the matter between: Case No. 356/2012 MINYUKU TSAKANI YVETTE MINYUKU TINYIKO ROSE MINYUKU MUHLURI 1 st Applicant 2 nd Applicant 3

More information

CASE NO: 6084/15. In the matter between: DENEL SOC LIMITED. Applicant. and

CASE NO: 6084/15. In the matter between: DENEL SOC LIMITED. Applicant. and Republic of South Africa In the High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division, Cape Town) In the matter between: DENEL SOC LIMITED CASE NO: 6084/15 Applicant and PERSONS WHOSE IDENTITIES ARE TO THE

More information

Not reportable Not of interest to other Judges. First Applicant. Second Applicant. and. First Respondent. Second Respondent.

Not reportable Not of interest to other Judges. First Applicant. Second Applicant. and. First Respondent. Second Respondent. ,. HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Not reportable Not of interest to other Judges CASE NO: 61163/2017 THE SPAR GROUP LIMITED THE SP AR GUILD OF SOUTHERN AFRICA NPC First Applicant

More information

RAMPOLA v THE MEC for EDUCATION LIMPOPO & ANOTHER JUDGEMENT

RAMPOLA v THE MEC for EDUCATION LIMPOPO & ANOTHER JUDGEMENT RAMPOLA v THE MEC for EDUCATION LIMPOPO & ANOTHER FORUM : HIGH COURT (TPD) JUDGE : VAN ROOYEN AJ CASE NO : 26675/05 DATE : 24 OCTOBER 2005 Applicant alleged summary dismissal from her post but in effect

More information

KWA SANI MUNICIPALITY UNDERBERG/HIMEVILLE COMMUNITY WATCH ASSOCIATION J U D G M E N T

KWA SANI MUNICIPALITY UNDERBERG/HIMEVILLE COMMUNITY WATCH ASSOCIATION J U D G M E N T IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG Case No. 415/13 In the matter between: KWA SANI MUNICIPALITY APPLICANT and UNDERBERG/HIMEVILLE COMMUNITY WATCH ASSOCIATION FIRST

More information

Municipal Notices Munisipale Kennisgewings

Municipal Notices Munisipale Kennisgewings 188 Kwazulu-natal Planning And Development Act (6/2008): Amended delegation of powers 1508 4 No. 1508 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE, EXTRAORDINARY, 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Municipal Notices Munisipale Kennisgewings MUNICIPAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM (PTY) LTD PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM (PTY) LTD PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No: 28738/2006 Date heard: 25 & 26 /10/2007 Date of judgment: 12/05/2008 LONDOLOZA FORESTRY CONSORTIUM

More information

1. FIKILE MAKAULA First Respondent 2. MNCEDISI MAKAULA Second Respondent 3. PHAMBILI MAKAULA Third Respondent 4. MZWANDILE MAKAULA Fourth Respondent

1. FIKILE MAKAULA First Respondent 2. MNCEDISI MAKAULA Second Respondent 3. PHAMBILI MAKAULA Third Respondent 4. MZWANDILE MAKAULA Fourth Respondent 1 NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA Case no: 1689/2011 In the matter between: 1. ZULU ROYAL FAMILY OF NCAPAI KAMADZIKANE KAZULU First Applicant 2. LUMUMBA

More information

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF SWAZILAND JUDGEMENT

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF SWAZILAND JUDGEMENT IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF SWAZILAND JUDGEMENT Case NO. 418/12 In the matter between: SIPHO DLAMINI Applicant And THE TEACHING SERVICE COMMISSION SWAZILAND GOVERNMENT THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL 1 st Respondent

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR TRADITIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR TRADITIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 73/03 XOLISILE ZONDI Applicant versus MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR TRADITIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS WILLIAM STEENBURG KOBUS BOTHA RICHARD COOK

More information

TWILIGHT BREEZE TRADING 119 CC [Registration number: 2003/065363/23]

TWILIGHT BREEZE TRADING 119 CC [Registration number: 2003/065363/23] .. \ { :' IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO In the matter between:- Case No: 4134/2017

More information

MEC FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

MEC FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO: CA 337/2013 DATE HEARD: 18/8/14 DATE DELIVERED: 22/8/14 REPORTABLE In the matter between: IKAMVA ARCHITECTS CC APPELLANT and MEC FOR

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) JUDGMENT 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) CASE NO: 2083/17 In the matter between: BUNTU BERNARD DLALA Applicant and O.R. TAMBO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY First Respondent THE

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 48226/12 In the application for admission as amici curiae of TREATMENT ACTION CAMPAIGN NPC SONKE GENDER JUSTICE NPC First

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No 427/96 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In die matter of: GNH OFFICE AUTOMATION C.C. First Appellant NAUGIS INVESTMENTS C.C. Second Appellant and PROVINCIAL

More information

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA PIETERMARITZBURG

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA PIETERMARITZBURG 1 IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA PIETERMARITZBURG CASE NO. 11224/11 In the matter between: STEVEN McGREGOR APPLICANT and THE REGIONAL MAGISTRATE Ms B. ASMAL N.O. FIRST RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Not reportable Not of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Case no: JR 202/10 In the matter between: K J LISANYANE Applicant and C J

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case number 90/2004 Reportable In the matter between: NORTHERN FREE STATE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY APPELLANT and VG MATSHAI RESPONDENT

More information

SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL

SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case no: J 420/08 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL Applicant WORKERS UNION And NORTH WEST HOUSING CORPORATION 1 st Respondent MEC

More information

IN HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG

IN HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION,

More information

KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG

KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG CASE NO: 8054/2011 In the matter between: ZUBEIR GOOLAM HOOSEN KADWA N.O. LAYLA MAHOMEDY N.O. AHMED YOUSUF KADWA N.O.

More information

3. The respondent s decision in terms whereof the first applicant was. review that is to be filed by the applicants within 30 (thirty) days from

3. The respondent s decision in terms whereof the first applicant was. review that is to be filed by the applicants within 30 (thirty) days from 2 3. The respondent s decision in terms whereof the first applicant was administratively discharged on 30 November 2009, is set aside and suspended, pending the institution and finalisation of an application

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY Case No: 580/11 Date of Hearing: 27.05.2011 Date Delivered: 17.06.2011 In the matter between: BABEREKI CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LIMITED

More information

JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 3 JUNE The applicant is the testamentary executor in the estate of the late

JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 3 JUNE The applicant is the testamentary executor in the estate of the late SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. P. A. PEARSON (PTY) LTD Applicant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. P. A. PEARSON (PTY) LTD Applicant IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA REPORTABLE KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN CASE NO: 13270/2012 In the matter between: P. A. PEARSON (PTY) LTD Applicant And EThekwini MUNICIPALITY NATIONAL MINISTER

More information

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG 1 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG In the matter between: Case no: J812\07 NIREN INDARDAV SINGH Applicant and SA RAIL COMMUTER CORPORATION LTD t\a METRORAIL Respondent JUDGMENT

More information

POTPALE INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD NKANYISO PHUMLANI MKHIZE JUDGMENT

POTPALE INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD NKANYISO PHUMLANI MKHIZE JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG In the matter between: REPORTABLE Case No: 11711/2014 POTPALE INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD Plaintiff And NKANYISO PHUMLANI MKHIZE Defendant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) CASE NO: 10310/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) CASE NO: 10310/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: BRENT DERECK JOHNSON LOUISE HENRIKSON EGEDAL-JOHNSON SAMUEL BARRY EGEDAL-JOHNSON CASE NO: 10310/2014 1 st Applicant

More information

/SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)

/SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) /SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) UNREPORTABLE DATE: 15/05/2009 CASE NO: 16198/2008 In the matter between: INITIATIVE SA INVESTMENTS 163 (PTY) LTD APPLICANT

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MEC: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, ECONOMIC SCHOON GODWILLY MAHUMANI

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MEC: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, ECONOMIC SCHOON GODWILLY MAHUMANI + THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between THE MEC: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND TOURISM: CASE NO: 478/03 Reportable NORTHERN PROVINCE APPELLANT and SCHOON GODWILLY

More information

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. SOUTH AFRICAN INLAND LOGISTICS CC First Applicant

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. SOUTH AFRICAN INLAND LOGISTICS CC First Applicant REPORTABLE IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 10314/2008 SOUTH AFRICAN INLAND LOGISTICS CC First Applicant SOOBRAMONEY NAIDOO Second Applicant RUMBA NAIDOO Third

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 172/16 SOUTH AFRICAN RIDING FOR THE DISABLED ASSOCIATION Applicant and REGIONAL LAND CLAIMS COMMISSIONER SEDICK SADIEN EBRAHIM SADIEN

More information

THE ARBITRATION ACT, An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to Arbitration.

THE ARBITRATION ACT, An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to Arbitration. THE ARBITRATION ACT, 1940. 1 ACT NO. X OF 1940 An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to Arbitration. [11 March, 1940] WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to arbitration

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS TECHNICAL (SOC) LTD

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS TECHNICAL (SOC) LTD REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: J1872/2015 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS (SOC) LTD SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS TECHNICAL

More information

[1] The plaintiff brought an action to review and set aside the decision. rejected an objection by Spiral Paper (Proprietary) Limited, to

[1] The plaintiff brought an action to review and set aside the decision. rejected an objection by Spiral Paper (Proprietary) Limited, to Reportable IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No.: 9986/2009 In the matter between: TONGAAT PAPER COMPANY (PTY) LTD PLAINTIFF and THE MASTER OF THE KWAZULU-NATAL

More information