Minutes of the Rockingham Development Review Board December 12, 2018
|
|
- Edmund Conley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Minutes of the Rockingham Development Review Board December 12, 2018 Members present: Pat Moyna (Chair), Thad Guild, Vincent Cherico, Archie Gleason, Remy Walker. Staff present: Chuck Wise. Members of the Public present: Andrew Smith, Lynne Lewandowski, Nicole Duquette, Bob Derusha, Ray Massucco, Wendy Harrison, Deb Wright. P.Moyna called the meeting to order at 7:00pm. P.Moyna reviewed meeting procedures. 1. Agenda Review: No changes 2. Public Comment: None 3. Approval of Minutes: November 14 th T.Guild motion to approve the minutes, A.Gleason second. PASSED. R.Walker abstains. 4. Organizational meeting V.Cherico motion to adopt the 2019 Rules of Procedure, T.Guild second. PASSED. Nominate Pat Moyna as Chair of the Development Review Board (T.Guild, 2 nd A.Gleason) Nominate Kath Martin as Vice Chair (P.Moyna, 2 nd T.Guild) Nominate C.Wise as Secretary (P.Moyna, 2 nd T.Guild). PASSED. Set 2019 DRB meeting time at 6:30pm C.Wise reminded members that letters of appointment are due. C.Wise ran an advertisement soliciting volunteers with no response. 5. Public hearing: A 18 Secondary sign administrator appeal 154 Rockingham Street Petrogas Group of New England 6. I will provide a brief zoning overview and defer to the Applicants for a project presentation. C.Wise provided an overview of the Appeal. C.Wise issued an Administrative Decision on October 22nd. An interested person, as defined by state law, may appeal any decision of the Administrative Officer to the Development Review Board within fifteen days of the Decision. The Abutters, present tonight, submitted an Appeal to this decision on October 30th. By law, the property abutters qualify for Interested Persons status. Their Appeal also falls within the defined time period allowed under state law. The DRB must hear all appeals of the Zoning Administrator. The DRB shall decide whether a Decision is upheld or overturned. As the Zoning Administrator, C.Wise s testimony is limited to the Administrator Decision and any overview of Administrator matters required. All public and abutters notifications were completed in accordance with state law. No one provided written testimony regarding the appeal. C.Wise made note of B.Derusha who is pursuing interested person status using a petition. Page 1 of 7
2 B.Derusha passed out his petition. P.Moyna read the petition aloud (attached). Discussion followed on the petition and how a petition qualifies an individual for interested person status. B.Derusha stated his interest in this application focuses on the challenges between the residential and commercial zoning districts. B.Derusha stated his interests pertain to these larger issues and he has ability to communicate the history of the property (not the present applicant) and its impacts to residential land uses. P.Moyna asked if B.Derusha s interests are because he lives in the vicinity of the project area. B.Derusha stated yes and that many of the signatures on the petition are also in the vicinity of this project. R.Massucco informed the DRB that the Applicant needed advance notice of this petition and an opportunity to review the signatures. R.Massucco further examined state statute (4465) and said Interested Parties can appeal a decision but that is to appeal a decision versus participating at a hearing where an appeal is being heard. The chance to appeal the decision has expired, so coming in with this petition at the hearing means that the petition is late and that the appeal period has already passed. R.Massucco stated the Abutters applied in a timely fashion, but that this appeal is late. B.Derusha stated that historically the PC ZBA would receive interested persons appeal requests at the hearing. Anyone that wanted to participate in the hearing would come to the Board and make that request. The Board always approved petitions during the evening of the hearing. P.Moyna asked C.Wise when he knew about the petition. C.Wise informed the Applicants when it was developing. R.Massucco agreed that this petition was known about but that the Applicants were never given the opportunity to examine the petition and its signatures. C.Wise confirmed B.Derusha s statements that traditionally the hearing is the forum to receive requests for interested persons status. N.Duquette asked about the interested persons status. What is the timeframe for submitting appeals and is there an expiration to all of this? C.Wise stated the current legal argument is whether B.Derusha can participate in a hearing versus submitting his own appeal. Historically, people wanting to participate in a hearing brought up their request to the DRB at the hearing. P.Moyna stated granting status right now does not make sense. We will need legal feedback on how to proceed with this petition. Once we commence with testimony, we do not want this being an outstanding issue. For example, if it was decided later to not grant status, then how do we discount the testimony that was heard at the hearing? This is particularly important because this Appeal could be appealed again. The best option is to continue the hearing until we get some clarity. #1 Petition needs to be provided to the Applicant so they can do their due diligence and meets the criteria. #2 Can granting Interested Person status during the Appeal process open this up to a second appeal? That by giving Interested Person status tonight, does that allow them to Page 2 of 7
3 appeal the DRB s decision separately? This is legally murky and we need clarity on how to proceed. V.Cherico discussed the motivation behind seeking interested person status and V.Cherico would like to know about the history. B.Derusha indicated that he was not prepared to give testimony before being granted interested person status. His interests go back to a decision he participated on in P.Moyna agreed to limit testimony until this issue was decided. B.Derusha clarified that even the DRB s decision to grant or not grant party status can be appealed. V.Cherico stated he would like legal input before proceeding with this hearing. T.Guild reviewed the language that supports a petition appeal. C.Wise asked about hearing some testimony and waiting later to decide the petition. Testimony could be received and later on that testimony can be considered as coming from an interested person or as a citizen. P.Moyna stated that we should be cautious about hearing any testimony before getting clarification on this petition. Once we hear testimony, we cannot unhear this testimony at a later date because interested person status was not granted. Further, there is a gravitas associated with giving testimony as an interested person versus a citizen and that this distinction matters. A.Smith asked if there is a time limit associated with the appeal and if delaying this hearing runs out the time limit for the appellant s right to appeal? P.Moyna stated no that this is a normal part of the process and once it is started it is started. We can have a hearing, realize we need more testimony and decide to continue the hearing. We can continue hearings as long as it takes to get the testimony we need to make a decision. C.Wise emphasized that his certification that an appeal was received within the deadline means the Appellants rights are protected. A.Smith asked that this hearing be delayed to the next meeting and to not have it delayed any further. P.Moyna stated this is generally the rule and we only push out hearings when Applicant s are not ready to provide the additional information that was requested by the DRB. C.Wise stated that the Board is limited in granting party status if a person meets the legal standard for petitioners. C.Wise stated the a petitioners motivations are not relevant. P.Moyna reiterated the questions that need answers. Can this petition be accepted during an appeal when it was not done during the 15 day appeal period? Does participating in this hearing, then open this up to a 2nd possible appeal? R.Massucco stated there is a significant difference of testimony received from an interested party or a citizen. These are important legal threshold questions that should be resolved before receiving testimony. B.Derusha clarified that this appeal is restricted to a single sign on the west side of the building. This has nothing to do with the other Decisions about this property. This appeal is only focused on one Administrator action. Page 3 of 7
4 T.Guild asked for guidance on what B.Derusha is seeking in terms of an appeal and interested person s status. B.Derusha stated he only wants interested persons status to participate in the public hearing as part of the Abutter s existing appeal. P.Moyna stated the hearing will be continued and instructed C.Wise to give a copy of the Petition to the abutters and to seek answers to the legal questions raised. C.Wise asked if the Petition should be certified by the Town Clerk and P.Moyna agreed that should happen. C.Wise stated the hearing will be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting on January 9 th. 7. Public hearing: Addition of parking spaces Site Plan Review with Variance 150 Rockingham Street Petrogas Group of New England C.Wise provided a zoning overview. The Property Owner is Petrogas Group of New England, Inc. The proposed project is for 4 parking spaces and site improvements at 150 Rockingham Street which requires a variance. Normally a review of parking spaces is a straight forward site plan review and approval. However, when a commercial use abuts a residential district, the spaces shall be no closer than fifteen feet to the property line. The Applicants will provide us a presentation that shows portions of the proposed parking that violates those setback requirements. Further, on the parking there is also a front buffer strip of land that must be at least 15 feet in width. The bylaws do not offer much guidance on what constitutes a 15 foot front strip of landscaped land. Is it 15 feet from road edge? Or 15 feet from edge of sidewalk? Again, there are portions of the proposed parking which violate these required setbacks. As the Administrator I processed this application as a variance because it was clear the property is an irregular shape, small in size, and possesses obvious development constraints. The property has an abandoned residential house. The DRB issued a demolition permit for that house. Along with the house slated for demolition, the existing site is a mix of lawn, high grasses and brush. There is a line of trees that screens 150 Rockingham Street from the abutting Atkinson Street residential properties. The Property is located within the Commercial Business Expansion 14 zoning district and the Downtown Design Review overlay district. The property directly abuts the Residential 7 zoning district to the south and west. The property is at the northern terminus of the central business district and the gateway for motorists entering the village. All public and abutter notifications were completed in accordance with state law. We have a written letter of submission from one of the abutters which was read aloud and attached to these minutes. N.Duquette provided an overview of the project. There are two parcels that are owned by The driveway for 154 Rockingham Street does encroach upon this other parcel. This parcel we are proposing to tear down the building and construct 4 parking spaces. We have two different lines that depict two different parking stall dimensions (22 feet or 18 feet in depth). The shorter depth allows less encroachment, but we are fine with the 22 feet. There is a rain garden that is intended to catch water run off and snow melt. The rain garden has organics and sand to filter out any toxins in the water. Page 4 of 7
5 Meetings with the abutter resulted in the changes to the design. N.Duquette has an from the abutter accepting these modifications to the plan ( s provided to C.Wise). The abutter asked for an extension of chain link fence and plantings which were completed. The hedge line is more mature than is typical and will be 4 5 feet tall at planting. The abutter wanted the chain link fence on the outside (facing 150 Rockingham St) so that people will see the fence and not attempt to enter the shrub line. With these changes in landscaping, the DRB will need to approve the original decision for demolition of the property. An earlier decision called for maintaining the existing trees which are past their normal lifespan and should be removed. N.Duquette stated there will be a fence installed in the rear of the building to prevent people from shortcutting behind the building and further impacting the abutters. When the fence is installed, people will need to walk around to access the store. C.Wise confirmed that the fence was reviewed by the BF Fire Chief and the Chief agrees with the installation of a fence. N.Duquette stated the abutter requested the parking spaces be shifted towards Rockingham Street by 3 feet which was done. A curb between the parking spaces and Rockingham Street was also added based on a request at the last hearing. The last request was to plant a row of hedges that would shield car headlights from residential properties to the south of the parking. R.Massucco reviewed the variance portions of this project. R.Massucco reviewed the parcel and the shape that is left with after applying all the various setbacks. After applying setbacks, the available land left for development is a narrow strip of land. The store has 7 spaces and needs a minimum of spaces per the town s zoning requirements. The additional 4 spaces would allow 7 Eleven to come more into conformance with parking standards. Parking in this area is consistent with neighboring land uses. R.Massucco reviewed all the various abutters and noted they are mostly commercial land uses with parking. There are minimal impacts to property abutters. The extent of encroachment is minimal. The proposed area of encroachment is only 3.4% of the total area of the lot. This is a nominal impact. These calculations are based on the 22 foot long spaces and the level of encroachment declines with the 18 foot deep parking stalls. This is a minimal incursion into the property setbacks. This meets the requirement in the bylaws to allow for the least deviation possible. R.Massucco reviewed the parking layout of the 7 Eleven. The store has a lot of traffic and the additional spaces will help the business and customers. Hopefully having more parking available will reduce the frequency of illegal parking along the sidewalk and adjacent to the fuel pumps. R.Massucco stated this property does have geometric constraints that were not created by the Applicant. This lot is not suitable for much development. In terms of practicality, parking is a good alternative to make this lot useable. Page 5 of 7
6 R.Massucco stated that the 4 spaces is a minimal impact. The DRB cannot require the 7 Eleven to meet the current parking standards, but that these additional spaces does move the business closer towards the ideal parking standards. The hardship has not been created by the Applicant. The parcel is bounded by the sidewalk, road, and abutters and not subject to change. R.Massucco discussed the difficulty of meeting the setback because of the shape of the property leads to a point that impacts the parking area. This is not an encroachment across the entire length of an abutters property but an encroachment right at this one point where the two properties meet. If this property point was moved 8 feet this would not be an issue. R.Massucco stated that the applicant has addressed all the abutter concerns by installing landscaping and moving the parking spaces away from his property. The lighting in the rear of the building has reduced the amount of activity back there. This area has been cleaned up and discouraged people loitering back there. R.Massucco stated the parking will not change the character of the neighborhood which has consistent uses all along this road. The DRB has allowed for shorter spaces and there is precedent for this design choice. R.Massucco emphasized that the level of encroachment is unique. If this was a structure, that would be more of an impact to an abutter. What is being discussed here is strictly on the ground and there will never be a structure proposed at this property. There is no light coming from windows, fans, or other visual or noise impacts common to buildings. V.Cherico asked about the landscaping and the provision to ensure it remains maintained. R.Massucco stated that decisions typically require maintenance of landscaping and that it would be difficult to spend thousands on this only to let it go unmaintained. P.Moyna opened the project up to citizen comment. L.Lewandowski stated she is proshrubbery but can the Applicant plant a fabulous evergreen? A spruce tree or two would be a good long term investment to block the light. A.Smith appreciated the hard work done at this site. A.Smith provided some thoughts on the variance and other considerations with these properties. A.Smith requested that the print out of his testimony be included in the minutes (attached so not repeated in these minutes). N.Duquette stressed that the abutters complaints have been received and that the Applicant is working with the Town to resolve them. It is important to note that this work is ongoing. N.Duquette provided some detail on a traffic study. This is an existing land use and there have been no changes to the business. Typically traffic studies are done when there is a new use proposed. Because this use isn t changing, a traffic study will not Page 6 of 7
7 provide additional information it would just provide the existing numbers to the store. The additional parking is to improve the safety of the site. R.Massucco stated the guardrail was installed in 2001 to channelize access. There was a time when motorists could enter this site from any direction. There is no additional pumps, no additional square footage being proposed. There is no problem with sight lines. The store remains unchanged. A.Smith stated the Board could require a traffic study. A.Smith stated there has been an increase in activity to include what was stated in the original application. The number of deliveries to this site has increased substantially. There are many deliveries to this site when the application only stipulated 1 delivery per day. The additional parking will provide some order to the site. It may not ameliorate some of the problems with people parking on the sidewalk or other inappropriate locations. Pedestrian and motorist safety is something that should really be looked at and to give serious thought to a traffic study. P.Moyna asked for clarity on L.Lewandowski s request for tree plantings. L.Lewandowski pointed out the possible location for trees to be planted which is behind the parking spaces. 8. Other business: The public hearing for # , the bicycle shelter and storage facility at the Rockingham Town Offices has been continued. C.Wise introduced W.Harrison who is the new Municipal Manager. 9. Meeting 9:11pm Page 7 of 7
8
9
10
11
ORDINANCE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. AN ORDINANCE to provide for the establishment of a Conditional Use to permit a
ORDINANCE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS CITY HALL: December 0, 0 CALENDAR NO. 3,0 NO. MAYOR COUNCIL SERIES BY: COUNCILMEMBER CANTRELL AN ORDINANCE to provide for the establishment of a Conditional Use to permit
More informationCity of Otsego Zoning Ordinance Section 16 General Building and Performance Requirements
City of Otsego Zoning Ordinance Section 16 General Building and Performance Requirements 20-16-6: FENCES: Fences shall be permitted in all yards subject to the following: A. Permit Required: It is unlawful
More informationARTICLE 1: Purpose and Administration
ARTICLE 1: Purpose and Administration... 1-1 17.1.1: Title...1-1 17.1.2: Purpose and Intent...1-1 17.1.3: Relationship to Comprehensive Plan...1-1 17.1.4: Effective Date...1-2 17.1.5: Applicability...1-2
More information3333STERLING HEIGHTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL DECEMBER 22, 2016
3333STERLING HEIGHTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL DECEMBER 22, 2016 LOCATION: City Council Chambers, 40555 Utica Road, Sterling Heights, MI SUBJECT: Minutes of the Regular Meeting
More informationMEETING DATE: Tuesday May 29, 2018 MEETING TIME: 6:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: City Council Chambers, 448 E. First Street, Suite 190, Salida, CO
MEETING DATE: Tuesday May 29, 2018 MEETING TIME: 6:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: City Council Chambers, 448 E. First Street, Suite 190, Salida, CO Present: Mandelkorn, Follet, Denning, Thomas, Farrell, Bomer,
More informationPlan and Zoning Commission City of Richmond Heights, Missouri
Plan and Zoning Commission City of Richmond Heights, Missouri Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m., Thursday, September 17, 2015 City Council Chambers Richmond Heights City Hall Call to order: Roll Call: (Note name
More information: FENCE STANDARDS:
10-1-33: FENCE STANDARDS: No person shall construct, erect, install, place, or replace any fence in the city not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this title and the international residential
More informationSUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA Thursday, 9:00 A.M. August 30, 2018 Hearing Room No. 2 Churchill Building, 10019-103 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB Hearing Date: Thursday, August 30, 2018 2 SUBDIVISION
More informationC. There were no agenda items deferred. ACTION TAKEN Motioned by Gardner, seconded by Wisner, to elect Gascon as temporary Chair.
Page 1 of 9 LAWRENCE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 7, 2017 Members present: Clark, Gardner, Gascon, Wilbur, Wisner Staff present: Crick, Dolar, Mortensen ITEM NO. 1 COMMUNICATIONS
More informationOFFICE CONSOLIDATION FENCE BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER By-Law Number Date Passed Section Amended
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION FENCE BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER 119-05 Passed by Council on November 28, 2005 Amendments: By-Law Number Date Passed Section Amended 55-07 April 23, 2007 Delete Private Swimming Pool Definition
More informationARTICLE F. Fences Ordinance
ARTICLE F Fences Ordinance SEC. 10-6-60 FENCES. (a) Fences. Fences are a permitted accessory use in any district and may be erected provided that the fence is maintained in good repair, that the finished
More informationARTICLE XI ENFORCEMENT, PERMITS, VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES
ARTICLE XI ENFORCEMENT, PERMITS, VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES SECTION 1101. ENFORCEMENT. A. Zoning Officer. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be administered and enforced by the Zoning Officer of the Township
More informationAGENDA CLAYTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT M AY 20, :00 P.M. CLAYTON TOWN HALL 111 East Second Street, Clayton NC
AGENDA CLAYTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT M AY 20, 2015 6:00 P.M. CLAYTON TOWN HALL 111 East Second Street, Clayton NC I. ROLL CALL II. III. IV. ANNOUNCEMENT OF QUORUM / VOTING MEMBERS ADJUSTMENTS TO AGENDA APPROVAL
More informationStaff Report TO: FROM: RE: Chesapeake Board of Zoning Appeals Dale Ware, AICP, CZA Application # ZON-BZA-2017-00022 1430 Oleander Avenue Hearing Date: September 28, 2017 Application # ZON-BZA-2017-00022
More informationDRAFT. City of Falls Church. Meeting Date:
1 2 DRAFT City of Falls Church Meeting Date: XX-XX-2011 Title: Ordinance To Amend Chapter 48, Zoning, Of The Code Of The City Of Falls Church, Virginia, In Order To Shift Authority For Review And Approval
More informationWILLIAM M. HUGEL AND ANNAMARIE HUGEL
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0144-V WILLIAM M. HUGEL AND ANNAMARIE HUGEL THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationO2-CD Zoning. B1-CD Zoning. O2-CD Zoning. RZ-1: Technical Data Sheet CHARLOTTE ETJ LIMITS 75' CLASS C RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT, LEFT IN ACCESS POINT
SITE PROPERTY LINE VICINITY MAP --Proposed Uses: On the portion of the Site zoned O-2(CD): a health institution (hospital), medical and general offices, and medical, dental and optical laboratory uses
More informationFence By-law. PS-6 Consolidated May 14, As Amended by: PS March 20, 2012 PS May 14, 2013
Fence By-law PS-6 Consolidated May 14, 2013 As Amended by: By-law No. Date Passed at Council PS-6-12001 March 20, 2012 PS-6-13002 May 14, 2013 This by-law is printed under and by authority of the Council
More informationORDINANCE NUMBER 1255
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 19.50 AND 19.61 OF THE ZONING CODE TO EXTEND THE APPROVAL PERIOD
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES CITY OF GRANT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES CITY OF GRANT Present: Absent: John Rog, James Drost, Darren Taylor, Jeff Schafer, Dennis Kaup and Robert Tufty Jeff Giefer Staff Present: City Planner, Jennifer Haskamp;
More informationFences and Walls Handout Excerpts from MBMC
Fences and Walls Handout Excerpts from MBMC MBMC Section 10.12.030 (P) Property Development Regulations: RS, RM, and RH districts The maximum height of a fence or wall shall be 6 feet in required side
More informationZoning Board of Appeals Decisions Decisions for: Close Window
Zoning Board of Appeals Decisions Decisions for: 03 03 2016 Close Window FALMOUTH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDINGS AND DECISION SPECIAL PERMIT NO: 001 16 APPLICANT: THOMAS F. SMITH of Mashpee, MA OWNER:
More informationREGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE
REGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PERMITS Article 1. General Provisions Section 3-101 Definitions Section 3-102 Applicable Requirements Article 2. Village Building Permits
More informationZoning Board of Appeals 1 DRAFT
12-02-14 Zoning Board of Appeals 1 A regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Cooperstown was held in the Village Office, 22 Main Street, Cooperstown, New York on December 2, 2014
More informationS U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A
S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A Thursday, 9:00 A.M. November 1, 2018 Hearing Room No. 3 Churchill Building, 10019-103 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB Hearing
More informationORDINANCE NO. 91. The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley, California, does ordain as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8, DIVISION 3, CHAPTER 3, OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE TOWN
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM City and County of Broomfield, Colorado To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Michael Sutherland, Planner Meeting Date
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS MEETINGS: 2nd Thursday of each month at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers, First Floor of City Hall. DUE DATE FOR SUBMITTALS: 2 weeks
More information- CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter 14 - PLANNING ARTICLE II. - RESIDENTIAL FENCE REGULATIONS
Sec. 14-21. - Short title. Sec. 14-22. - Definitions. Sec. 14-23. - Purpose. Sec. 14-24. - Scope. Sec. 14-25. - Permit requirements. Sec. 14-26. - Fence types, dimensions and specifications. Sec. 14-27.
More informationZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK. Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean Parkway District
ZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF NEW YORK Bill de Blasio, Mayor CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Carl Weisbrod, Director Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean
More informationCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES May 11, 2010
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES May 11, 2010 Chairperson Watkins called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Glass, Kryza, Werner, Jahr, Wardwell, McKenna
More informationChairperson Schafer; Vice-Chair Berndt; Members: Napier, Oen and Stearn
REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 12, 2004 PAGE 1 Present: Absent: Chairperson Schafer; Vice-Chair Berndt; Members: Napier, Oen and Stearn Brady, Fahlen, Needham and Verdi-Hus Also
More informationTOWN OF ST. GERMAIN P. O. BOX 7 ST. GERMAIN, WI 54558
TOWN OF ST. GERMAIN P. O. BOX 7 ST. GERMAIN, WI 54558 www.townofstgermain.org Minutes, Zoning Committee March 06, 2019 1. Call to order: Chairman Ritter called meeting to order at 5:30pm 2. Roll call,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Proposed revisions to Town of Kiawah Island Board of Zoning Appeals Rules of Procedure
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Town of Kiawah Island BZA Members John Taylor, Jr., Planning Director DATE: December 10, 2018 SUBJECT: Monday, December 17, 2018 4:00 p.m. Kiawah Island BZA Meeting Packet Attached
More informationSection 3. Compliance with County and Appalachian Board of Health Rules.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WATAUGA WATAUGA COUNTY MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS ORDINANCE Section 1. Authority and Purpose. Pursuant to the authority granted to counties in North Carolina General Statute
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DEVIATION APPLICATION AND REVIEW PROCESS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE DEVIATION APPLICATION AND REVIEW PROCESS Overview: Administrative deviations are intended to encourage owners of residential properties in LDR-1 or LDR-2 Districts
More informationROUND HILL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES February 3, 2009
Page 1 ROUND HILL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES February 3, 2009 The regular meeting of the Round Hill Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 in the Town Office, 23 Main
More informationUNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE City of Richmond, TX Page 1 CHAPTER 6 ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE 6.3 PERMITS AND PROCEDURES Division 6.3.100 Required Permits and Approvals Sec. 6.3.101 Approvals and Permits
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WATERLOO
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WATERLOO BY-LAW NUMBER 2013-0 1] A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF FENCES AND PRIVACY SCREENS WITHIN THE CITY OF WATERLOO WHEREAS section 11 (3)(7) of the Municipal
More informationARTICLE 4 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES AND APPROVAL CRITERIA 3
ARTICLE 4 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES AND APPROVAL CRITERIA 3 Chapter 4.1 General Review Procedures 4 4.1.010 Purpose and Applicability Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.1.020 Zoning Checklist 6 4.1.030
More informationTECHNICAL DATA SHEET - MUDD DEVELOPMENT AREA RZ1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA DEVELOPMENT AREA A DEVELOPMENT AREA B
TECHNICAL DATA SHEET - MUDD AREA SITE DATA Acreage: ± 2.57 acres Tax Parcel #s: 155-012-09;- 10 & -12 Existing Zoning: O-2 Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O Existing Uses: Medical and professional offices uses.
More informationPetition No Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. R-90-1897 RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION NO. 90-25 SPECIAL EXCEPTION PETITION OF SYNERGY GAS CORPORATION BY DENNIS P. KOELER, AGENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } } } } } } Decision and Order
STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT In re: Appeals of David Jackson Docket Nos. 165-9-99 Vtec, 43-2-00 Vtec, and 190-9-00 Vtec In re: Appeal Gerald and Patricia McCue Docket No. 258-12-99 Vtec Decision
More informationSPECIAL SECTIONS 500.
SPECIAL SECTIONS 500. Notwithstanding the "R3" zone designation, the lands delineated on Schedule "B" of this By-law as "R3-500" shall only be used for single-family detached dwellings in cluster development
More informationCITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Number: O-1 Date: November 8, 2017 Subject: ZA17-002 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (BIANNUAL REVIEW) Request that the City Council consider approving an ordinance
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
VARIANCE APPLICATION FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE For Consideration Of: BOARD OF APPEALS VARIANCE ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE Applicant Information: Applicant: *Mailing Address: City, State, Zip
More informationPart Two: Administrative Duties and Responsibilities, Procedures, Bylaw Amendments and Council Guidelines
Part Two: Administrative Duties and Responsibilities, Procedures, Bylaw Amendments and Council Guidelines 2.1 Development Officer... 2 2.2 Permission Required for Development... 2 2.3 Method of Development
More information9:30. Ward 12 Anthony Brancatelli. Collection Appeal
` Board of Zoning Appeals 601 Lakeside Avenue, Room 516 Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1071 Http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/bza/cpc.html 216.664.2580 FEBRUARY 12, 2018 Calendar No. 18-04: 4427 Rocky River
More informationCHAPTER IX. ADMINISTRATION & ENFORCEMENT
CHAPTER IX. ADMINISTRATION & ENFORCEMENT Section 9.1 Permits & Approvals (A) Permit Requirements. No development or subdivision of land may commence in the Town of Charlotte until all applicable municipal
More informationCITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT
CITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT February 2016 23200 Gratiot, Eastpointe, MI 48021 - Building Department -- 586-445-3661 A FENCE PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS IT MEETS
More informationCITY OF COVINGTON Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance ADOPTED DRAFT
3.3014. Additional MUOD Requirements. In addition to the required yard, landscaped buffers, signage and screening, an enhanced landscape plan shall be required of all mixed-use developments, consistent
More informationORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS
ORDINANCE NO. 13-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DEBARY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF DEBARY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 SECTION 1-3 CONCERNING HEDGE DEFINITION; CHAPTER 2 SECTION 2-5 CONCERNING
More informationThe meeting was called to order by Chairman Dan Kasaris at 7:00 p.m.
The Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of North Royalton met on November 25, 2014 to hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers at 14600 State Road. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dan
More informationJennifer Barone, Development Engineer Eric Fink, Asst. Law Director Sheila Uzl Transcriptionist
KENT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING JULY 16, 2013 MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Peter Paino John Gargan Melissa Long Greg Balbierz Anthony Catalano Jennifer Barone, Development Engineer
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS The Board of Zoning and Building Appeals meetings are held on the 2nd Thursday of each month at 7:00 P.M. Submittals must
More informationUse Variance Application Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Ontario
Use Variance Application Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Ontario Applicant Information Please type or print Org. 3/2000; Rev. 5/2007, Rev. 4/2008 I (We) of (Name) (Mailing Address) (Telephone) (Alternate
More informationTown of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425
Page 1 of 21 Town of Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes APPROVED June 25, 2018 Town of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Established July
More informationAGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT 3801 HARRISON BOULEVARD, OGDEN CITY, UTAH
AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT 3801 HARRISON BOULEVARD, OGDEN CITY, UTAH This Agreement for development of land, hereinafter referred to as the AGREEMENT, entered into this day of, 2017, between
More informationCITY OF WHITEHORSE BYLAW
A bylaw to amend Zoning Bylaw 2012-20 CITY OF WHITEHORSE BYLAW 2019-07 WHEREAS section 289 of the Municipal Act provides that a zoning bylaw may prohibit, regulate and control the use and development of
More informationBILL NO ORDINANCE NO. 5249
BILL NO. 5394 ORDINANCE NO. 5249 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PORTION OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS, MISSOURI LOCATED ALONG EAGER AND MCCUTCHEON
More informationTOWN OF WAKEFIELD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTM ENT 2 High Street Sanbornville, New Hampshire INSTRUCTIONS - APP LICATION F OR VARIANCE
INSTRUCTIONS - APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Page 1 of 5 TOWN OF WAKEFIELD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTM ENT 2 High Street Sanbornville, New Hampshire 03872 INSTRUCTIONS - APP LICATION F OR VARIANCE Please read carefully
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016 DATE: September 11, 2016 SUBJECT: U-3432-16-1 USE PERMIT REVIEW to allow live entertainment at Texas Jack s Barbecue; located
More informationCITY OF GRAHAM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT February 19, 2013
80 CITY OF GRAHAM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT February 19, 2013 There was a meeting called of the Board of Adjustment on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 7:00 pm following the Planning Zoning Board meeting in the
More informationCITY OF YORBA LINDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. February 15, 2012
CITY OF YORBA LINDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES February 15, 2012 CALL TO ORDER The February 15, 2012 regularly scheduled meeting of the Yorba Linda Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00
More informationHILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 2003
HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING MEETING MINUTES OF Chairman Van Nest called the Planning Board meeting of October 9, 2003 to order at 7:30 p.m. announcing that this meeting had been
More informationTITLE 16 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, ETC 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS Obstructing streets, alleys, or sidewalks prohibited. No
Change 8, November 7, 2005 16-1 CHAPTER 1. MISCELLANEOUS. 2. EXCAVATIONS AND CUTS. 3. SIDEWALK REPAIRS. TITLE 16 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, ETC 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 16-101. Obstructing streets,
More informationHIGHWAY STREET Chapter 801 OBSTRUCTION - HIGHWAY
Chapter 801 CHAPTER INDEX Article 1 INTERPRETATION... 3 801.1.1 Boulevard - defined... 3 801.1.2 Commissioner - defined... 3 801.1.3 Corner lot - defined... 3 801.1.4 Council - defined... 3 801.1.5 Front
More informationUp Previous Next Main Collapse Search Print Title 23 ZONING
Up Previous Next Main Collapse Search Print Chapter 23.105 SPECIFIC PLAN 5 Note * Prior ordinance history: Ordinances 86 O 118, 88 O 118 and 90 O 101. 23.105.010 Location. This specific plan shall encompass
More informationMINUTES September 20, 2017 Plan Commission City of Batavia. Chair LaLonde; Vice-Chair Schneider; Commissioners Gosselin, Harms, Joseph, Peterson
MINUTES Plan Commission City of Batavia PLEASE NOTE: These minutes are not a word-for-word transcription of the statements made at the meeting, nor intended to be a comprehensive review of all discussions.
More information#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT
#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT 1. Section 390-5, entitled Designation of Zones of Article
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION Type A B C (circle one)
Baker City Hall File No. 1655 First Street, Suites 105/106 Applicant P.O. Box 650 Received by Baker City, OR 97814 Date (541) 524 2030 / 2028 Accepted as Complete by FAX (541) 524 2049 Date Accepted as
More informationBoard of Adjustment. November 19, 2013 immediately following the Planning Board meeting at 7:00pm Council Chambers, 201 S Main St.
Board of Adjustment Meeting Agenda November 19, 2013 immediately following the Planning Board meeting at 7:00pm Council Chambers, 201 S Main St Invocation 1. Approve minutes of the February 19, 2013 meeting
More informationCHAPTER 4 - EARTH REMOVAL BY-LAW
CHAPTER 4 - EARTH REMOVAL BY-LAW Section 1 - Definitions: Article I - Earth Removal (A) Interpretation: In Construing this By-Law, the following words shall have meaning herein given, unless a contrary
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION
VARIANCE APPLICATION FROM THE [ ] UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE [ ] SIGN ORDINANCE For Consideration of: [ ] BOARD OF APPEALS VARIANCE [ ] ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE Applicant Information: Applicant: *Mailing
More informationCITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended....
CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO. 14711 A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No. 12000, as amended. As amended by Bylaw No: 18245, 07/07/14........................................................... THIS
More informationPort Huron Charter Township Section Fences Ordinance # 233
Port Huron Charter Township Section 40-737 Fences Ordinance # 233 An Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Section 40-737. Fences, by the revision of the existing Section to read as follows: The Charter Township
More informationSite Provisions 8C-1. A. General. B. Number of Parking Spaces Required. Design Manual Chapter 8 - Parking Lots 8C - Site Provisions
Design Manual Chapter 8 - Parking Lots 8C - Site Provisions 8C-1 Site Provisions A. General This section provides design criteria for site requirements such as number of parking spaces, landscaping, parking
More informationVillage of Bellaire PLANNING COMMISSION. Commissioners: Dan Bennett, Butch Dewey, Bill Drollinger, Fred Harris, and Don Seman
Village of Bellaire PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioners: Dan Bennett, Butch Dewey, Bill Drollinger, Fred Harris, and Don Seman PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES June 12, 2018 6:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order:
More informationSPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Please complete this application and provide the required information. In order for this application to be accepted, all applicable sections must be fully
More informationORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BELMONT AMENDING REGULATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE HOME SIZE IN R-1 DISTRICTS IN THE BELMONT ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 360) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT
More informationUPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD P.O. BOX 2187 UPPER CHICHESTER, PA (610)
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD P.O. BOX 2187 UPPER CHICHESTER, PA 19061 (610) 485-5719 INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS A. General Instructions Applicants who have a request to make of the Zoning
More informationTOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 7, 2017
TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 7, 2017 The combined public/work session meeting of the Board of Adjustment held at the Municipal Building, 475 Corporate Drive, Mahwah, NJ, beginning
More informationVariance Application Checklist
Variance Application Checklist Completed application form Completed Criteria for a Variance sheet, addressing the five items set forth by the New Hampshire Supreme Court governing the granting of Variances.
More informationTOWN OF WAKEFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE LAND USE DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF WAKEFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE LAND USE DEPARTMENT 2 HIGH STREET SANBORNVILLE NH 03872 TELEPHONE (603) 522-6205 x 308 FAX (603) 522-2295 LANDUSECODEDEPT@WAKEFIELDNH.COM MINUTES OF THE PLANNING BOARD
More informationARTICLE 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AND ENFORCEMENT
ARTICLE 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AND ENFORCEMENT Section 1501 Brule County Zoning Administrator An administrative official who shall be known as the Zoning Administrator and who shall be designated
More informationHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Fence Construction Guidelines
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Fence Construction Guidelines May 29, 2012 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Dear Whispering Hills Homeowner, Thank you for your willingness to abide by the fencing guidelines of the Whispering
More informationRUSSELL PROPERTIES, LLC
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0222-V RUSSELL PROPERTIES, LLC SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: NOVEMBER 17, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
More informationOFFICIAL MINUTES NIAGARA FALLS PLANNING BOARD JUNE 14th, 2017
OFFICIAL MINUTES NIAGARA FALLS PLANNING BOARD JUNE 14th, 2017 A meeting of the Niagara Falls Planning Board was held Wednesday, June 14th, 2017 at 6:01 PM in Council Chambers, City Hall, 745 Main Street,
More information2018 MEETING DATES AND FILING DEADLINES
2018 MEETING DATES AND FILING DEADLINES Meeting Date Filing Deadline February 26 January 26 March 26 February 23 April 23 March 23 May 21 April 20 June 25 May 25 July 23 June 22 August 27 July 27 September
More informationFALL RIVER REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FALL RIVER REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECLARATION OF COMMERCE PARK COVENANTS As a means of insuring proper development and job creation opportunities, the Fall River Redevelopment Authority (FRRA) would sell
More informationVARIANCE STAFF REPORT
2017-V-50 Page 1 of 8 VARIANCE STAFF REPORT Docket Number: 2017-V-50 Applicant/Property Owner: Spirit Master Funding, LLC 2001 Joshua Road Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2431 Public Hearing Date: December 14,
More informationOrdinance # SECTION 1: General Provisions. A. Administration
Ordinance #700-005 An ordinance for the purpose of promoting health, safety, order, convenience and general welfare of the people of the City of Hewitt by regulating within the corporate limits the use
More informationJunkyard Law 2007 Revision
Junkyard Law 2007 Revision Section I. Purpose The Town of Wheatfield desires to set out fair and comprehensive rules and regulations governing the creation, maintenance, and screening of junkyards. The
More informationSEPTEMBER 10, 2013 MINUTES OAKLAND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OAKLAND COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 8:00.M. PUBLIC HEARING
SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 MINUTES OAKLAND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OAKLAND COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 8:00.M. PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to Chapter 231, Public Law 1975 Open Public Meetings Act) adequate notice of this meeting
More informationYORK COUNTY GOVERNMENT
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: June 20, 2016 York County Council York County Planning Commission Audra Miller, Planning Director YORK COUNTY GOVERNMENT Planning & Development Services Proposed Revisions
More informationChapter 11: Map and Text Amendments
Chapter 11: Map and Text Amendments Section 11.1 Purpose... 11-2 Section 11.2 Amendment Initiation... 11-2 Section 11.3 Submittal... 11-3 Section 11.4 Planning Board Action... 11-4 Section 11.5 Board of
More informationORDINANCE NO * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, ( City ) is
ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MONT BELVIEU, TEXAS, TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGES IN THE ZONING CODE RELATED TO LANDSCAPING; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING
More informationCITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW SAFETY CODES PERMIT BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JANUARY 1, 2016)
CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW 15894 SAFETY CODES PERMIT BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JANUARY 1, 2016) Bylaw 15894 Page 2 of 15 THE CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW 15894 SAFETY CODES PERMIT BYLAW Whereas, pursuant to section
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF NEWBURY BY-LAW A By-law to Prescribe the Height and Type of Fences
THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF NEWBURY BY-LAW 120-16 A By-law to Prescribe the Height and Type of Fences WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, S.O., 2001, C. 25, S. 11 a Council may pass a by-law respecting
More informationANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No
DRAFT -- Submitted by: Prepared by: Reviewed by: For reading: ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No. 0- Chair Gray-Jackson at the Request of the Mayor Office of Economic and Community Development Department of Law 0
More information