09/06/2013 Letter Event ID: LETTER RECEIVED FROM MICHAEL C THEIS. 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN
|
|
|
- Jade Parker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REDACTED 09/06/2013 Letter Event ID: LETTER RECEIVED FROM MICHAEL C THEIS RE: UPDATE CONCERNING NEW YORK APPEAL OF NON-PARTY WITNESS JANA WINTER 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: REVISED MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE: SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF POINT LOMA CREDIT UNION BANK RECORDS [D-122A] FILED BY THE DEFENSE 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE PROSECUTING A CAPTIAL OFFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT VIOLATES THE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION {D-171] FILED BY THE DEFENSE 09/06/2013 Reply Event ID: REPLY TO PROSECUTIONS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR PROSECUTORIAL INTERFERENCE WITH DEFENSE INVESTIGATION [D-137] FILED BY THE DEFENSE
2 09/06/2013 Reply Event ID: REPLY TO PROSECUTIONS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO PRECLUDE OPINION TESTIMONY CONCERNING CRIME SCENE RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ANY BLOOD SPLATTER ANALYSIS AND BULLET TRAJECTORY ANLYSIS PURSUANT TO CRE 702 AND 403, DUE PROCESS, AND PEOPLE V SHRECK 22 P 3D 68 (COLO 2001) [D-106] FILED BY THE DEFENSE 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE PROSECUTING A CAPITAL OFFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT VIOLATES THE GRAND JURY INDICTMENT VIOLATES THE GRAND JURY CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNTIED STATES CONSTITUTION [D-170] FILED BY THE DEFENSE 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE PROSECUTING A CAPITAL OFFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT VIOLATES THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION [D-172] FILED BY THE DEFENSE.
3 09/06/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER STRIKING UNTIMELY CAPITAL MOTIONS (C-55). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/06/2013 Notice Filed Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS NOTICE OF LABELING OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 LETTER FROM NON-PARTY WITNESS JANA WINTER (C-56). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, MICHAEL THEIS, CHRISTOPHER MURRARY, AND DORI ANN HANSWRTH. 09/06/2013 Notice Filed Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS NOTICE REGARDING REPORT FROM COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO (C-57). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON.
4 09/06/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO SUPPRESS THE PEOPLES SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY CONCERNING FIREARMS, BALLISTICS, AND TOOLMARK IDENTIFICATION, PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 701, 702, 403, DUE PROCESS, AND PEOPLE V. SHRECK, 22 P.3D 68 (COLO.2001) (D-110). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/11/2013 Notice Filed Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS NOTICE, WITH CORRECTED DATE, OF LABELING OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 LETTER FROM NON-PARTY WITNESS JANA WINTER (C-56A). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, MICHAEL THEISS, CHRSTOPHER MURRAY, AND DORI ANN HANSWIRTH. 09/11/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY IN-COURT OR OUT-OF-COURT IDENTIFICATIONS OF MR. HOLMES BY DAVID CASPER AND/OR KAFAI SUEN (D-138). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON.
5 09/11/2013 Notice Filed Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS NOTICE OF LABELING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2013 REPORT FROM COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO (C-58). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/12/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR PROSECUTORIAL INTERFERENCE WITH DEFENSE INVESTIGATION (D-137). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/12/2013 Hearing 09/30/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Hour(s) Note..: SDT RETURN End of Case: 2012 CR
08/16/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY --
REDACTED 08/16/2013 Order Event ID: 000743 THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY -- MISSING MEDICAL REPORTS (D-42). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON,
08/30/2013 Motion Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN ATTACHEMENTS - STD /JR. 08/30/2013 Motion Event ID:
REDACTED 08/30/2013 Motion Event ID: 000793 MOTION TO DELCARE THE DEATH PENALTY UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR ITS FAILURE IN PRACTICE TO MEET THE MINIMUM CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN FURMAN GREGG AND
09/27/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL STD /30/2013 /REB
REDACTED 09/27/2013 Motion Event ID: 000875 MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL STD 201 09/30/2013 09/27/2013 Objection Event ID: 000876 DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN
REDACTED. 10/04/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION REGARDING ORDERS TO PRODUCE RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-3, PSDT-4 AND
REDACTED 10/04/2013 Motion Event ID: 000945 MOTION REGARDING ORDERS TO PRODUCE RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-3, PSDT-4 AND PSDT-5 FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STD 201 10-4-2013 /REB 10/04/2013 Notice Filed
REDACTED. 4/03/2015 Filing Other Event ID: E-Filed: N DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-7 SEALED ENVELOPE #197 /LKO
REDACTED 4/03/2015 Order Event ID: 000730 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO SUPPRESS PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION D-285A (C-191). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON,
REDACTED. 01/30/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 9
REDACTED 01/30/2015 Notice Filed Event ID: 000608 E-Filed: N DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN DEFENSE NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 16(III)(B) (D-278) SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #179 STD 201 1 30
REDACTED. 03/06/2015 Motion Event ID: E-Filed: N MOTION BY MEDIA PETITIONERS TO UNSUPPRESS THE JURY QUESTIONNAIRE.
REDACTED 03/06/2015 Motion Event ID: 000675 E-Filed: N MOTION BY MEDIA PETITIONERS TO UNSUPPRESS THE JURY QUESTIONNAIRE. STD 3 6 15 /LKO 03/06/2015 Order Event ID: 000676 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS ORDER
REBEKKA HIGGS, KATHERINE SPENGLER, AND KRISTEN NELSON. THE PEOPLE ARE
REDACTED 03/13/2015 Motion Event ID: 000691 E-Filed: N MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE (D-206A) WITH ATTACHED CD AND EXHIBITS FILED BY
REDACTED. 02/26/2015 Minute Order (No Print) Event ID: E-Filed: N COURTROOM 202 MONITOR THIS MORNING WAS XXX AND THIS AFTERNOON WAS XXX /CMR
REDACTED 02/26/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000659 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 25 FEBRUARY 26, 2015 REPORTERS: ELMSHAUESER MORNING; TROYANEK AFTERNOON DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEYS
REDACTED. 5/07/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL DAY 63 MAY 7, 2015
REDACTED 5/07/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000793 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL DAY 63 MAY 7, 2015 REPORTER: TROYANEK ALL DAY REPRESENTED BY GEORGE BRAUCHLER, JACOB EDSON, KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, THE
REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER D [D-263] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL
![REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER D [D-263] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL](/thumbs/76/74031478.jpg "REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER D [D-263] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL")
REDACTED District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Filed Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Potomac St., Centennial, CO 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, DEC 2 4 2014 Plaintiff CLERK OF THE COMBINED
6/24/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 91 JUNE 24, 2015
REDACTED 6/24/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000851 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 91 JUNE 24, 2015 REPORTER: FIKANY ALL DAY DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEYS KATHERINE SPENGLER AND KRISTEN
REDA TE MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE OF AN OUT OF STATE WITNESS FROM CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL
REDA TE District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Potomac St., Centennial CO 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. Plaintiff v. JAMES HOLMES, Defendant DOUGLAS K.
MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL [D-267] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL
![MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL [D-267] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL](/thumbs/77/75332162.jpg "MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL [D-267] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL")
REDACTED District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Potomac St., Centennial, CO 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Plaintiff Filed JAN o'7 2015 CLERK OF THE COMBINED
I, as well as all evidence and testimony of Dr. Reid's opinions and. Division: 202 ^COURT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
REDACTED DISTRICT COURT, ARAPAHOE COLNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 7325 S. Potomac St. Centennial, Colorado 80 1 12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ^COURT USE ONLY^ v. JAMES EAGAN HOLMES, I)efendant Case No.
PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENSE "MOTION FOR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS TO WITNESSES AND JURORS REGARDING VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE" [D-242] Introduction
![PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION FOR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS TO WITNESSES AND JURORS REGARDING VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE [D-242] Introduction](/thumbs/86/93061849.jpg "PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION FOR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS TO WITNESSES AND JURORS REGARDING VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE [D-242] Introduction")
REDACTED DISTRICT COURT, ARAPAHOE COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO Arapahoe County Justice Center 7325 S. Potomac Street Centennial, Colorado 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO vs. Defendant( s): JAMES
Judge s Introductory Remarks. Center. My name is Carlos Samour, and I am the judge assigned to this division.
Judge s Introductory Remarks Hello everyone. Welcome to division 201 of the Arapahoe County Justice Center. My name is Carlos Samour, and I am the judge assigned to this division. Let me start off by thanking
Kffiffi tu{:www. 1. The prosecution takes issue with four categories of evidence the defense inlends
Kffiffi tu{:www Disfict Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Pctomac St.. Centennial. CO 80112 Filod THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Plaintiff JAN 0 7 t06 v. JAMES HOLMES,
Religious Beliefs, Motion for Voir Dire on Sentence Length, and Motion for Voir
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CRIMINAL COURT DEPARTMENT STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff, VS. FRAZIER GLENN CROSS, JR., Defendant. 14CR853 Div. 17 STATE S BRIEF RE: JURY SELECTION COMES NOW
RULINGS ON MOTIONS. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on several motions filed by the Defendant on
DISTRICT COURT CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Plaintiff v. MAKHAIL PURPERA Defendant DATE FILED: August 12, 2018 2:26 PM
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016COA35 Court of Appeals No. 14CA1719 El Paso County District Court No. 13CR3800 Honorable Barney Iuppa, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher
APPEAL DISMISSED. Division III Opinion by JUDGE ROY Dailey and Richman, JJ., concur. Announced June 24, 2010
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 08CA2321 Arapahoe County District Court No. 06CR3642 Honorable Charles M. Pratt, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert
In Order C-137, the Court addressed two requests for expanded media
REDACTED DISTRICT COURT, ARAPAHOE COI.JNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 7325 S. Potomac St. Centennial, Colorado 801 12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ^COURT USE ONLY^ v. JAMES EAGAN HOLMES, Defendant Case No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, vs. STEVEN DALE GREEN, DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT
IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) VS. ) REQUEST FOR ) VOLUNTARY DISCOVERY ) (ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR ) DISCOVERY) Defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. No. 11-00224-01/02-CR-W-DW JOSHUA SIMONSON, a/k/a Joshua Michael of Simonson,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CRIMINAL DIVISION ORDER
Filed D.C. Superior Court 01/30/2018 10:18AM Clerk of the Court SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CRIMINAL DIVISION UNITED STATES : Case No. 2016 CF1 002267 v. : Judge Judith Bartnoff BENITO VALDEZ
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF DURHAM 00 CRS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF DURHAM 00 CRS 000000 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) EX PARTE v. ) MOTION FOR ) FUNDS FOR AN EXPERT JOHN DOE, ) WITNESS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE DIVISION 3 ) STATE OF TENNESSEE ) ) V. ) NO ) ) ) JASON WHITE ) ) PETITION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE DIVISION 3 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. NO. 16-02794 17-01568 JASON WHITE PETITION Comes now Jason White pro-se, and files this Petition in exercising his 1 st Amendment
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v., Defendant(s). Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The defendant(s), appeared for
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Grand Jury Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, THOMAS J. KIRSCHNER, MISC NO. 09-MC-50872 Judge Paul D. Borman Defendant.
The United States Constitution
The United States Constitution The Structure of Government Republican Form of Government Representative Democracy Federation of States with a central government THE PREAMBLE: 3 words that changed the world
Name: Class: Date: 5. The amendment to the U.S. Constitution that forbids cruel and unusual punishment and prohibits excessive bail is the
1. Roman laws a. often came to include commentaries written by judges. b. treated criminals with compassion. c. were ignored by the Emperor Justinian. d. were condemned by the Roman Catholic Church. 2.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 71 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. -against- PEOPLE'S VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE FORM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 71 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK KEVIN CLOR, -against- PEOPLE'S VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE FORM Indictment No. 05866/2011 Defendant. The
People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (b), the Presiding
People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, 2009. Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.5(b), the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Dennis Blaine Evanson (Attorney
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 (PERSONS IN STATE CUSTODY) 1) The attached form is
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT (2000)
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 10 Spring 4-1-2001 APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT. 2348 (2000) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/crsj
Chapter , McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 4 The Constitution: The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment Selective incorporation of free expression rights Fourteenth Amendment due process clause prevents states from abridging individual
Court of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Hudson, 2011-Ohio-3832.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95581 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. TONIO HUDSON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Using Tradition and Custom to Promote Healing in Tribal Courts
Using Tradition and Custom to Promote Healing in Tribal Courts Exploring the Impact of Federal Law on the Development of Tribal Courts Stephen L. Pevar December 10, 2014 Palm Springs, California Tribal
Re: Disqualification of CDL license for 1 year and DWI charge. You have asked me to prepare a memorandum regarding the following questions: Does the
OFFICE RESEARCH MEMORANDUM To: Dr. Warren, Public Defender From: Ryan Jacobs, Intern Re: State v. Barnes Case: 13 1 00056 9 Re: Disqualification of CDL license for 1 year and DWI charge during hit and
ENDURING UNDERSTANDING ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE MAKING CONNECTIONS. - The application of the Bill of Rights is continuously interpreted by the courts
Name: Period: Date: Here s what you need to do UNDERSTAND information in the Enduring Understanding column. STUDY / MEMORIZE / KNOW information in the Essential Knowledge column. You will be tested on
Criminal Law Table of Contents
Criminal Law Table of Contents Attorney - Client Relations Legal Services Retainer Agreement - Hourly Fee Appearance of Counsel Waiver of Conflict of Interest Letter Declining Representation Motion to
COURT USE ONLY. DATE FILED: August 15, 2017
DISTRICT COURT, LA PLATA COUNTY, COLORADO Court Address: 1060 East 2nd Avenue, Room 106, Durango, CO, 81301-5157 The People of the State of Colorado v. MARK ALLEN REDWINE DATE FILED: August 15, 2017 COURT
During the constitutional debates many delegates feared that the Constitution as
THE BILL OF RIGHTS Grade 5 United States History and Geography I. Introduction During the constitutional debates many delegates feared that the Constitution as drafted gave too much power to the central
Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step 2 Getting Defendant Before The Court! There are four methods to getting the defendant before the court 1) Warrantless Arrest 2)
Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS
Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED A. The First Amendment protects five basic freedoms for all Americans. RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 372 Filed 01/26/11 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT -WC Document 372 Filed 01/26/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR. NO. 2:10cr186-MHT
Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights
You do not need your computers today. Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights How have the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments' rights of the accused been incorporated as a right of all American citizens?
6 Right of accused to a speedy and public trial before an impartial jury Accused must be informed of charges and have the right to cross-examine hosti
1 Amendments to the Constitution Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Freedom of Assembly Freedom of the Press Freedom to Petition the Government for redress of grievances Right to Bear Arms Right of
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. CHRISTOPHER A. MOBLEY : T.C. Case No. 01-CR-3064
[Cite as State v. Mobley, 2002-Ohio-5535.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellant : vs. : C.A. Case No. 19176 CHRISTOPHER A. MOBLEY : T.C. Case No. 01-CR-3064
People v. Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. 15PDJ041. August 25, 2017.
People v. Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. 15PDJ041. August 25, 2017. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. (attorney registration number 06389),
Johnson v. Commonwealth 529 S.E.2d 769 (Va. 2000)
Capital Defense Journal Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 19 Fall 9-1-2000 Johnson v. Commonwealth 529 S.E.2d 769 (Va. 2000) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlucdj Part
Principles of the Constitution. Republicanism. Popular Sovereignty 9/5/2012
Principles of the Constitution Republicanism A republic is a nation governed by elected representatives. It is the opposite of a monarchy, with rule by king Popular Sovereignty A government in which the
. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. June 16, As you know, this matter was tried to the Court on June 10, 2004.
. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSEPH R. SLIGHTS, III ASSOCIATE JUDGE NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 500 NORTH KING STREET WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801 (302) 255-0656 June 16, 2004 Brian
ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT -WC Document 132 Filed 10/18/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR NO. 2:10cr186-MHT
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIALS)
DISTRICT COURT CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 BANNOCK ST. DENVER, CO 80202 DATE FILED: June 23, 2015 8:18 AM CASE NUMBER: 2015CV30918 Plaintiff(s): CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, v. Defendant(s):
The Bill of Rights determines how you must be treated by the government. It outlines your rights as an American.
Learning Target I can explain the basic rights promised in the Bill of Rights. Why You Should Care The Bill of Rights determines how you must be treated by the government. It outlines your rights as an
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 12, 2016 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 12, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTHONY R. SMITH, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC15-CR-1064 John
Packet Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background
Packet Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background Review from Introduction to Law The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The United States Supreme Court is the final
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cr-000-tor Document Filed 0// UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, RHONDA LEE FIRESTACK- HARVEY (), LARRY LESTER HARVEY (), MICHELLE
Day 7 - The Bill of Rights: A Transcription
Day 7 - The Bill of Rights: A Transcription The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791,
v No Oakland Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 16, 2018 v No. 334081 Oakland Circuit Court SHANNON GARRETT WITHERSPOON,
Chapter 6 The Constitution and Business
Chapter 6 The Constitution and Business Checks and balances the national government is composed of three separate branches: the executive, the legislative, and the judicial branches. Each branch of the
The Five Freedoms: 1. Religion 2. Assembly 3. Press 4. Petition 5. Speech RAPPS
The Five Freedoms: 1. Religion 2. Assembly 3. Press 4. Petition 5. Speech RAPPS A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
The Amendments. Constitution Unit
The Amendments Constitution Unit Amending the Constitution The United States Constitution was written in 1787 and ratified in 1788 The country s founding fathers knew that over time, the Constitution may
PETITION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Mar 6 2018 19:55:11 2016-KA-00932-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-00932-COA JACARRUS ANTYONE PICKETT APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation
United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation Class 4: Individual Rights and Criminal Procedure Monday, December 17, 2018 Dane S. Ciolino A.R. Christovich Professor of Law Loyola
FEDERALISM. As a consequence, rights established under deeds, wills, contracts, and the like in one state must be recognized by other states.
FEDERALISM Federal Government: A form of government where states form a union and the sovereign power is divided between the national government and the various states. The Privileges and Immunities Clause:
Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Two elements must exist at the same time for a person to be convicted of a crime:
Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business Criminal Liability Two elements must exist at the same time for a person to be convicted of a crime: 1 the performance of a prohibited act (actus reus) 2 a specified
Criminal Procedure. 8 th Edition Joel Samaha. Wadsworth Publishing
Criminal Procedure 8 th Edition Joel Samaha Wadsworth Publishing Criminal Procedure and the Constitution Chapter 2 Constitutionalism In a constitutional democracy, constitutionalism is the idea that constitutions
The Big Idea The U.S. Constitution balances the powers of the federal government among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Understanding the Constitution The Big Idea The U.S. Constitution balances the powers of the federal government among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Main Ideas The framers of the Constitution
The Incorporation Doctrine Extending the Bill of Rights to the States
The Incorporation Doctrine Extending the Bill of Rights to the States Barron v. Baltimore (1833) Bill of Rights applies only to national government; does not restrict states 14 th Amendment (1868) No state
Civil Liberties and Public Policy
Civil Liberties and Public Policy Chapter 4 The Bill of Rights Then and Now Civil Liberties Definition: The legal constitutional protections against the government. The Bill of Rights and the States The
U.S. History. Constitution. Why is compromise essential to the foundation of our government? Name: Period: Due:
U.S. History Constitution Why is compromise essential to the foundation of our government? Name: Period: Due: I can explain how our government was created. I can explain the function of each branch of
No. 06SC188, Medina v. People Sentencing for Crime Different than Jury Conviction Violates Due Process and Sixth Amendment
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us/supct/supctcaseannctsindex.htm and are posted on the
MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 96-1202 MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE Treaty Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND Signed at Washington
COURT USE ONLY KEVON BELL DURRON BRYANT DEVION COLLINS
4 DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, COLORADO Arapahoe County Justice Center 7350 South Potomac Centennial, CO 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, KEVON BELL DURRON BRYANT DEVION COLLINS SHAWN
JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK (716)
Supplemental Outline on Effective Discovery JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14203 (716) 842-0416 INTRODUCTION This outline supplements the thorough course
SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE MINUTES OF MEETING. June 28, 2013
SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE MINUTES OF MEETING June 28, 2013 The Supreme Court Civil Rules Committee was called to order by Richard W. Laugesen at 1:39 p.m. in the 4 th Floor, Supreme
2012 CO 55 No. 12SA101, People v. Pittman, Miranda suppression custodial interrogation totality of the circumstances
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association
CHIEF JUDGE ORDER SETTING FORTH BOND GUIDELINES
EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT: ARAPAHOE, DOUGLAS, ELBERT and LINCOLN COUNTIES, COLORADO Arapahoe County Justice Center 7325 South Potomac Street Centennial, Colorado 80112 Arapahoe County Courthouse Littleton
2014 CO 47. No. 13SA102, People v. Storlie Criminal Law Dismissal, Nolle Prosequi, or Discontinuance.
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association
The Bill of Rights. Amendments #1-10 GET OUT FLASHCARDS!!
The Bill of Rights Amendments #1-10 GET OUT FLASHCARDS!! Bill of Rights The Bill of Rights protects citizens from government interference. Issues related to the Bill of Rights are still being applied,
Case 1:08-cr SLR Document 24 Filed 07/14/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:08-cr-00040-SLR Document 24 Filed 07/14/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Criminal Action No. 08-40-SLR
TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * On October 20, 2006, Jonearl B. Smith was charged by complaint with
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 23, 2011 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff - Appellee,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3403
[Cite as State v. Pointer, 193 Ohio App.3d 674, 2011-Ohio-1419.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO. 24210 v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3403 POINTER,
State of New Hampshire. Chasrick Heredia. Docket No CR On February 8, 2019, following a jury trial, defendant, Chasrick Heredia, was
State of New Hampshire NORTHERN DISTRICT morning hours of May 11, 2018. Manchester police officers Michael Roscoe and this altercation Officer Roscoe intervened in the struggle and employed force against
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. the United States of America, by and through the
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * vs. * NO. 4-94 CR 121-Y * ORLANDO CORDIA HALL (2) * r,--" -~--- u.s. ':;:S7::\ C7 :C~,~T
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC00-1327 RONALD COTE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [August 30, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have for review Cote v. State, 760 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), which
DePaul Law Review. DePaul College of Law. Volume 10 Issue 1 Fall-Winter Article 16
DePaul Law Review Volume 10 Issue 1 Fall-Winter 1960 Article 16 Constitutional Law - Statute Authorizing Search without Warrant Upheld by Reason of Equal Division of Supreme Court - Ohio ex rel. Eaton
SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NASSAU STATE OF NEW YORK. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- RANDY STITH, Defendant
SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NASSAU STATE OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- RANDY STITH, Defendant THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NASSAU, by this indictment, accuses the defendant
TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED
TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY
District Attorney for the 18th Judicial District, State of Colorado, ORDER AFFIRMED
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA33 Court of Appeals No. 16CA0588 Arapahoe County District Court No. 15CV30140 Honorable Elizabeth A. Weishaupl, Judge In the Matter of Douglas Roy Stanley, Petitioner-Appellant,
Regulatory Agenda
2016-2017 Regulatory Agenda Hilary Johnson/Policy Analyst November 1, 2016 Summary of Agency Rule Reviews (Regulatory Plan Progress) The Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC) began conducting rule reviews
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 09-70030 Document: 00511160264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D June 30, 2010 Lyle
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 53
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 53 Court of Appeals No. 11CA2030 City and County of Denver District Court No. 05CR4442 Honorable Christina M. Habas, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Main Idea: The framers of the Constitution created a flexible plan for governing the U.S far into the future.
Con t i H n o k Draw an illustration for each of the seven principles in the boxes below. Main Idea: The framers of the Constitution created a flexible plan for governing the U.S far into the future. The
2013 CO 31. No. 12SA156, People v. Brothers Subpoena Motion to Quash Preliminary Hearing Child victim Standing
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us and are posted on the Colorado Bar Association homepage