B. Welling. J. Skinner. R. Morrow
|
|
- Rolf Russell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 OPAC IN THE MATTER OF THE POLICE ACT, R.S.O c. 351 AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION B E T W E E N : THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF POLICE FOR THE CITY OF STRATFORD (hereinafter referred to as the "Board" - and - STRATFORD POLICE ASSOCIATION (hereinafter referred to as the "Association") ARBITRATOR: B. Welling APPEARING FOR THE BOARD: J. Skinner APPEARING FOR THE ASSOCIATION: R. Morrow A HEARING IN THIS MATTER WAS HELD IN STRATFORD, ONTARIO, ON 25 AUGUST 1980
2 AWARD "' This grievance arose out of the denial of "service pay" to police officers Brown, Bunting, and Hoy of the Stratford Police Force. A hearing in this matter was held in Stratford, Qntario> on 25'August 1980 at which time the parties presented evidence and argument. No objections were raised to the jurisdiction of the arbitrator or that the dispute could be subject to arbitration, The crux of the matter can be simply stated. The Collective Agreement provides that an extra amount of pay, caller' service pay, may be paid to police officers in recognition of past service with other police forces. The three grievors in this case applied for service pay on this basis and their applications were denied. The grievors claim that their past service records, which are not disputed by the Board of Police Commissioners, compelled the payment of the service pay increment. They further claim that the failure to award this pay was discriminatory, which would also be a violation of the Collective Agreement. The Board of Police Commissioners responds that while they clearly have the power to award service pay for past service with other police forces, they have no obligation to do so and that the Commissioners are entitled to differentiate between individual officers in using this power. This is, then, a dispute as to whether the wording of the Collective Agreement is mandatory or permissive.
3 The parties submitted an agreed statement of facts which greatly assisted in clarifying the issues. This reads as follows: The agreement between the Board of Commissioners of Police for the City of Stratford and the Stratford Police Association dated June 13, 1968 but effective commencing January 1st, 1968, contained provisions relating to service pay as follows: 8:04 The members of the Stratford Police Department shall receive service pay at the rate of $6.00 per month for each five years of service. 8:05 If a member leaves the service of the Department, he is to be paid service pay on a pro rata basis, an amount equal to his entitlement for that year. 8:06 In the event of death, Board to pay service pay entitlement earned to the estate. Although these provisions probably appeared in earlier agreements, no attempt has been made to trace the history of the section prior to A further agreement was entered into dated July 3rd, 1969, to be effective from January 1st, The service pay provisions were amended so that the clause in the agreement read as follows: 8:04 The members of the Stratford Police Department shall receive service pay at the rate of $6.00 per month for each five years of service. The Board may approve payment of service pay to members of the Department for years of service with other Police Departments prior to joining the Stratford Police Department. The pay-out of service pay for prior service will have no effect on seniority. 8:05 If a member leaves the service of the Department, he is to be paid service pay on a pro rata basis, an amount equal to his entitlement for that year. 8:06 In the event of death, Board to pay service pay entitlement earned to the estate.
4 The question of service pay was part of the negotiations leading up to the 1969 contract being entered' into. Although the agreement was dated July 3rd, 1969, it was given retroactive effect to January 1st, The agreement was accepted by the Board of Commissioners of Police for the City of Stratford at a meeting July 3rd, At the same meeting, the question of service pay was dealt with in the minutes as follows: 4. Re: Section 8:04 of the agreement with the Association - Service pay for officers with previous experience. A motion was made by Judge Ehgoetz, seconded by Judge Lang, that this Commission agrees that the following officers receive service pay on the basis of previous Police experience prior to joining the Stratford Police Force as follows: Cst. R. Harefeld - 8 years; Cst. A. Large - 20 years; Cst. R. Parker - 10 years; Cst. D. Pommer - 12 years retroactive to January 1st, Carried. The next occasion on which service pay appears to be dealt with in the minutes was for a meeting on November 20, The relevant exerpt was as follows: Letters from S. Payne and R. Coe, regarding application for service pay for prior Police service, were read. A motion was made by Judge Ehgoetz, seconded by Judge Lang, that the following Officers receive service pay on the basis of previous Police Experience prior to joining the Stratford Police Department: S. Payne - 1 year; R. Coe - 3 years retroactive to January 1st, Carried. With respect to the Officers named above, the following were the years when they commenced employment as Police Officers in Stratford, their prior Police service, and an indication of the level at which they started with the Stratford Police Department:
5 5. NAME DATE STARTED PRIOR POLICE SERVICE STARTED AS Richard Coe Ross Parker Albert Large Donald Pommer Ross Harefeld Scott Payne years 10 years 20 years 12 years 8 years 1 year Probationary 2nd Class 1st Class 1st Class 2nd Class Probationary Between 1969 and 1973, no other service pay was awarded on the basis of prior Police service as no ex- Police Officers joined the Force during that period. In 1973 and 1974, the following Officers joined the Stratford Police Department, having prior Police Service: NAME DATE STARTED PRIOR POLICE SERVICE STARTED AS Larry Stacey John Balmer David Mills William Appel Harold Vousden years 6 months 6 years 1 year 1 year 1st Class 3rd Class 1st Class 3rd Class 3rd Class Service pay was not awarded by the Department to any of the above-mentioned Officers with respect to any Police service prior to joining the Stratford Police Department. There is no reference in the minutes to any application ever being made by them or on their behalf for service pay based on prior service. Cst. Vousden resigned prior to having 5 years total Police service in any event. On December 8, 1977, service pay was approved for John Roper who started with the Department in 1976 on the basis of seven years' prior Police service. Cst. Roper joined the Department as a Police Officer as a Probationary Constable at a salary of $9, (the Third Class Constable rate at that time was $14,759.13). On February 1st, 1979, service pay was approved for Peter Snell who started with the Department in 1976 with four years, seven months' prior Police service. Cst. Snell started with the Department as a Probationary Constable at a salary of $9, (the Third Class Constable rate at that time was $14,759.13).
6 Csts. Bunting and Brown (who are Grievors in these proceedings) had applied for service pay in 1978 at the same time as Cst. Snell, but service pay was not granted to them at that time. A further request was made by Csts. Bunting, Brown and Hoy in 1979, but the request for service pay was not granted at that time and this grievance arises out of that last decision. Cst. Bunting joined the Stratford Police Department in 1976 having two years' two months' prior Police service. He started as a Third Class Constable at a salary of $14, (the Probationary Constable salary would have been $9,899.59). Cst. Albert Brown commenced service with the Stratford Police Department in 1977, having 12 years' seven months' prior Police service, as a Third Class Constable earning $15, (Probationary Constable salary was $10,691.55). Cst. Randy Hoy joined the Stratford Police Department in 1978 having three years' eight months' prior Police service as a Third Class Constable earning $17, (Probationary Constable salary was $11,439.96). Under the collective-agreement, a Probationary Constable would receve an increase in salary after six months' service and would be promoted to Third Class Constable after one year. There would be a further increase in salary as a Third Class Constable after eighteen months' service and a promotion to Second Class Constable after two years' service. A promotion to First Class Constable would usually follow three years after joining the Police Force. - End of agreed statement of facts - 6. In sum, the parties are in agreement that all who applied for service pay in the past on the basis of service with other police forces had their requests granted. Constable Brown, who had twelve years and two month s ' prior service with the Essex Police Force in the United Kingdom and five months of service with the Metropolitan Toronto Police Force had his request denied.. Constable Bunting who had two years' and two months' prior
7 7. service with the York Regional Police had his request denied Constable Hoy who had three years' and eight months' prior service with the Ontario Provincial Police had his request denied. Constable Brown was called as a witness by the Association and essentially confirmed certain details of the agreed statement of facts. Constable Bunting was also called as a witness. He further confirmed some of the agreed facts and, in addition, gave some particulars of his own case. It appears that Constable Bunting was required to travel out of town several times during his first year of appointment in Stratford because of Court cases held over from his work in Toronto. He had requested some assistance from his superiors in Stratford in order that he could avoid out-of-pocket expenses in attending these hearings, but all that was done was to permit him to use his statutory holiday time for these days. There appears to have been some misunderstanding as to whether the Police Chief had suggested to him that he would be awarded service pay, but the misunderstanding seems clearly to have resulted from a break down in communication between the two. Chief of Police MacDonald, who was also called as a witness by the Association, did not recall having made such a commitment to Constable Bunting. As both witnesses were entirely forthright and clear in their evidence, I have no doubt that both were giving the facts as accurately as they could recall them. It therefore seems doubtful that any special consideration was promised to Constable Bunting, even though he may have mistakenly got that impression from his conversations with the Chief of Police.
8 The Association's case is that Article 8: (set out on p. 3) of the Collective Agreement gives the Board power to approve payment of service pay in these cases and that it gives the power in such a way that it is unclear whether the Commissioners are left» with any discretion in exercising the power. There is well established authority for the proposition that where the Collective Agreement is unclear, it may be interpreted by reference to past practice. past practice in this case, according to the Association, was to award service pay on the basis of prior service with other police forces to all police officers who requested it. The To deny the service pay in this case would be a breach of the mandatory provisions of Article 8:04 and also of Article 3:02 which states: The Board and the Association agree that there will be no discrimination, interference, restraint or coercion exercised or practiced by the parties or their representatives against members of the Force, or membership in the Association. (Emphasis added). The association also submitted in evidence a recent Ontario Divisional Court case, Beauchamp v. Espinola, released 27 June 1980 and not yet reported. This case involvad the dismissal of a Police Constable without a hearing and although it does include some comments regarding "fair play" it is clearly not applicable to this case. Mr. Skinner, representing the Police Commissioners, interpreted the facts in quite another light. He argued that Article 8:04 of the Collective Agreement is entirely clear on its terms and is permissive not mandatory. He further argued that the
9 denial of.a request for service pay in this case was not discriminatory as the evidence of past practice would support the conclusion that the Commissioners differentiated between the requests for service pay on the basis of the salary levels at which some individuals started with the Force and on the basis of familiarity with the past work of certain other individuals. Mr. Skinner set out the classic dilemma, usually found in statutory interpretation, involving the words "may" and "shall", As he conceded, the word "may" sometimes is interpreted as mandatory, although it ordinarily is taken to be permissive. He sought to establish that it was permissive in Article 8:04 by two methods. First, he noted the fact that Article 8:04 was clarified in 1968 and the word "may" was used to allow for payments of service pay in recognition of past service with other police departments, whereas the word "shall" was used in reference to service pay for years of service with the Stratford Police. Second, he pointed out other other sections in the Collective Agreement, Article 20:01 and 20:02; 22:03 and 24:01, in which "shall" and "may" were used. His conclusion was that the intent of the Collective Agreement was clear: mandatory is indicated by use of the word "shall"; discretionary powers are given by use of the word "may". I think Mr. Skinner is correct on this point. Article 8:04 clearly requires the Police Commissioners to pay service pay for each 5 years of service with the Stratford Police Force. word "shall" is used to give them this power and obligation. By The
10 ' 10. contrast, the word "may" is used in giving the Commissioners power to award service pay for past service with other Police Forces. This is not mandatory. The Board has no obligation to award service pay on this basis in particular situations. Their only obligation is to decide whether or not to award the service pay without breaching any other section of the Collective Agreement. Thus, provided they do not act in a discriminatory fashion in contravention of Article 3:02, they are free to differentiate between various requests. In this regard Mr. Skinner's review of the facts suggested a past practice of distinguishing between various requests on a non-discriminatory basis. It must be kept in mind that the past practice here is based on a relatively small number of cases. According to the agreed statement of facts service pay for past service with other police forces has been granted to only eight people. Four of them, Richard Coe, Scott Payne, John Roper, and Peter Snell started their careers in the Stratford Force at the rank of Probationary Constable. Four others, Ross Parker, Albert Large, Donald Pommer, and Ross Harefeld began as First or Second Class Constables. According to Mr. Skinner's argument, the group that started as Probationary Constables would have begun at approximately $5, per year lower salaries than had they been appointed at the Third Class rank. It would thus be possible that the Commissioners had considered this large salary differential in determining whether to give them monetary credit
11 11, for their prior years of service with other police forces. In the case of the four who had been awarded service pay despite their appointment at.the higher ranks, these were Police Officers whose prior performance was well known to the Stratford Police Chief. Chief MacDonald gave evidence that he was personally familiar with the work of these four individuals prior to their appointment to the Stratford Force. This was because three of them, Constables Parker, Large and Pommer, had all been- previously employed at Sebringville, the O.P.P. Detatchment service the Stratford area, and Constable Harefeld was with the Mitchell Police Force, which was only 12 miles away. Mr. Skinner's submission of the basis of these facts was that the past performance of the Board was consistent with using their power under Article 8:04 to either compensate people appointed at a relatively low starting salary or to treat prior police experience of a nature known to be somewhat similar to the Stratford requirements in the same manner as if it had been with the Stratford Force. Thus, the Board was using its discretion in a perfectly reasonable manner and was not being discriminatory. It is not necessary to determine whether that was the method of making decisions actually employed by the Board of Commissioners as there seems no doubt that the evidence is consistent with Mr. Skinner's interpretation. No evidence was tendered as to how the Board actually had made its decisions, nor need any have been presented. It was the responsibility of the Police Association in
12 12. this case to show that the power was handled in a discriminatory fashion. As the evidence is no more consistent with their contention than it is with that of the Police Commissioners, the Association has failed in proving their case. In sum, the Collective Agreement gives the Commissioners power to award service pay for past service with other police forces. They are not obliged to award service pay in such situations, but may.exercise discretion in so doing. Their decisions on this issue in the past were not shown to be inconsistent with their refusal of service pay in the case of the three grievors. I should like to thank both parties for their concise and helpful submissions in this case. In particular, their ability to agree upon a statement of facts was of great assistance in bringing the hearing to a speedy conslusion. The parties are to be commended for their co-operative approach to the grievance procedure. The grievance is dismissed DATED at London, Ontario, this 29th day of August, ' B. Welli^f/ Sole Arpijzrator.
And the grievance of.constable Donald Bryce - Reclassification. Hearings in Southampton on March 22 and May 11-12, 1982
OPAC 82-005 Concerning an arbitration Pursuant to the Police Act, R.S.O. 1980, ch. 381 Between: SOUTHAMPTON POLICE ASSOCIATION - and - SOUTHAMPTON POLICE COMMITTEE FOR THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON
More informationSPORT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE OF CANADA (SDRCC) CENTRE DE RÈGLEMENT DES DIFFÈRENDS SPORTIFS DU CANADA (CRDSC)
SPORT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE OF CANADA (SDRCC) CENTRE DE RÈGLEMENT DES DIFFÈRENDS SPORTIFS DU CANADA (CRDSC) NO: SDRCC DT 10-0117 (DOPING TRIBUNAL) CANADIAN CENTRE FOR ETHICS IN SPORT (CCES) AND JEFFREY
More informationInterim Award #3 Re-accumulation of sick leave
IN THE MATTER OF THE ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: ONTARIO POWER GENERATION INC. - The Employer -and- THE SOCIETY OF ENERGY PROFESSIONALS The Union In The
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: INTERIM PLACE AND OPSEU GRIEVANCE OF L. REYES BEFORE: SUSAN L. STEWART ARBITRATOR APPEARANCES
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: INTERIM PLACE AND OPSEU GRIEVANCE OF L. REYES BEFORE: SUSAN L. STEWART ARBITRATOR APPEARANCES FOR THE UNION: FOR THE EMPLOYER: J. MICALLEF, COUNSEL S. KRUTH, COUNSEL
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE LABOUR RELATIONS ACT, 1995 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF THE LABOUR RELATIONS ACT, 1995 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: ALGOMA STEEL INC. (hereinafter the Company ) AND UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 2251 (hereinafter the
More informationThe Voice of the Legal Profession. Bill 166, Strengthening Protection for Ontario Consumers Act, Standing Committee on Social Policy
The Voice of the Legal Profession Bill 166, Strengthening Protection for Ontario Consumers Act, 2017 Submitted to: Submitted by: Standing Committee on Social Policy The Ontario Bar Association Date: November
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00668/17 November 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00668/17 November 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all the material information from
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION. Under THE PUBLIC SERVICE ACT. Before THE PUBLIC SERVICE GRIEVANCE BOARD. Lussier-Faouaz. - and -
Public Service Grievance Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission des griefs de la fonction publique Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest
More informationJohnstone & Cowling llp
Johnstone & Cowling llp J&C POST June 2014 VOL 6 NO. 2 OCPC Allows Motion to Defer When Criminal Litigation is Pending In the recent case of Noor Khan v. York Regional Police Service, the Ontario Civilian
More informationCANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO Heard in Edmonton, September 13, Concerning
CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO. 4484 Heard in Edmonton, September 13, 2016 Concerning CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY And UNITED STEELWORKERS LOCAL 2004 DISPUTE: The discharge
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY The Honourable G. Normand Glaude, Commissioner
IN THE MATTER OF THE CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY The Honourable G. Normand Glaude, Commissioner IN THE MATTER OF an Application for Limited Standing for Part I of the Cornwall Public Inquiry by Det Inspector
More informationChristopher Albertyn - Sole Arbitrator
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN DURHAM REGIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION ( the Association / the Union ) - AND - DURHAM REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE ( the Employer / the Board ) CONCERNING THE OPERATIONAL
More informationAGREEMENT. Between. BRANT COUNTY ROMAN CATHOLIC SEPARATE SCHOOL BOARD (hereinafter called the "Board") OF THE FIRST PART. And
AGREEMENT Between BRANT COUNTY ROMAN CATHOLIC SEPARATE SCHOOL BOARD (hereinafter called the "Board") OF THE FIRST PART And THE BRANT HALDIMAND NORFOLK OCCASIONAL TEACHER LOCAL OF THE ONTARIO ENGLISH CATHOLIC
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION. Under THE PUBLIC SERVICE ACT. Before THE PUBLIC SERVICE GRIEVANCE BOARD. Tom Sawyer et al.
Public Service Grievance Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission des griefs de la fonction publique Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest
More informationTHE CHATHAM-KENT POLICE ASSOCIATION (Hereinafter referred to as the Association ) -and-
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION B E T W E E N: THE CHATHAM-KENT POLICE ASSOCIATION (Hereinafter referred to as the Association ) -and- THE CHATHAM-KENT POLICE SERVICES BOARD (Hereinafter referred to as
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN:
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: Ontario Public Service Employees Union (The Employer ) -and- Ontario Public Service Staff Union (The Union ) BEFORE: Christine Schmidt, Sole Arbitrator For the
More informationCOLLECTIVE AGREEMENT. Between. THE GRAND ERIE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD (hereinafter called Athe and
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT Between THE GRAND ERIE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD (hereinafter called Athe Board@) and THE ONTARIO SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS= FEDERATION Representing OCCASIONAL TEACHERS EMPLOYED IN THE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT. Christopher Shaw. and. Windsor Police Association
Ontario Police Arbitration Commission Date: June 2, 2014 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT Christopher Shaw and Windsor Police Association BEFORE: Ian R. Mackenzie, Arbitrator
More informationOFFICE OF THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER
Legislative Assembly of Ontario Assemblée législative de l Ontario OFFICE OF THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER ~ REPORT OF LYNN MORRISON ACTING INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER RE: MICHAEL A. BROWN, MEMBER FOR ALGOMA-MANITOULIN
More informationMEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT between the Faculty Association of the University of Waterloo and the University of Waterloo Adopted May 1, 1998 Revised June 6, 2000 Revised April 2, 2002 Amended June 16 2003
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 12, 22nd January,
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 12, 22nd January, 2001 000 No. 3 of 2001 First Session Sixth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
1 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155 DATE: 20120313 DOCKET: C53665 Goudge, Armstrong and Lang JJ.A. BETWEEN Michael Shaw and Chief William Blair Appellants and Ronald Phipps
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationONTARIO ) ) Plaintiff ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) HEARD: September 15, 2017 ENDORSEMENT
CITATION: Fulmer v Nordstrong Equipment Limited, 2017 ONSC 5529 COURT FILE NO.: CV-17-568293 DATE: 20170925 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: GLEN FULMER Kristen Pennington, for the Plaintiff
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COLUMBIA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 93 AND THE COLUMBIA MISSOURI NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION JULY 1, JUNE 30, 2019
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COLUMBIA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 93 AND THE COLUMBIA MISSOURI NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION JULY 1, 2016 - JUNE 30, 2019 This Agreement is entered into between the Columbia School
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationThe Labour Relations Board Saskatchewan. MARVIN TAYLOR, Applicant and REGINA POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent
The Labour Relations Board Saskatchewan MARVIN TAYLOR, Applicant and REGINA POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent LRB File No. 016-03; June 25, 2003 Chairperson, Gwen Gray, Q.C.; Members: Gloria Cymbalisty
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT. HACKLAND R.S.J., SWINTON and KARAKATSANIS JJ.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT COURT FILE NO.: 29/07, 30/07 DATE: 20090306 HACKLAND R.S.J., SWINTON and KARAKATSANIS JJ. B E T W E E N: COMMISSIONER AND JANE DOE, AND B E T W E E N:
More informationSearch Warrant. Appendix H (ii)
Part One Report of the Walkerton Inquiry 121 Search Warrant Appendix H (ii) Search Warrant (Public Inquiries Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 41, as amended, Form 3) TO: Inspector Craig Hannaford, Royal Canadian
More informationAGREEMENT. between THE METUCHEN BOARD OF EDUCATION. and THE METUCHEN PRINCIPALS AND SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION JULY 1, through
AGREEMENT between THE METUCHEN BOARD OF EDUCATION and THE METUCHEN PRINCIPALS AND SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION JULY 1, 2007 through JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Article Page I Recognition... 2 II Board Rights...
More informationIndemnification of Legal Expenses Denied to. Off-Duty Constable who Used Excessive. Force While Acting as a Private Citizen
In Peel Regional Police Association and Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, the Arbitrator determined whether the Board was correct to deny Constable Szuch indemnification for legal expenses
More informationAND IN THE MATTER OF GRIEVANCE OF CONSTABLE RAYMOND CAYEN. Chief R. J. Zanibbi - Chief of Police
OPAC 86-016 IN THE MATTER OF THE POLICE ACT R.S.O. 1980, Chapter 381 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Between Sudburv Regional Board of Commissioners of Police (hereinafter called the "Board") and Sudburv
More informationGOODHUE, D. (OPSEU) v. CENTENNIAL COLLEGE (Samuels) December 8, 1988
HEADNOTE Board of Arbitration OPSEU #88A629 Dismissal GOODHUE, D. (OPSEU) v. CENTENNIAL COLLEGE (Samuels) December 8, 1988 The grievor was a probationary employee who grieved he had been terminated in
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL: 06/15/2012 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationL. Kamerman ) Tuesday, the 23rd day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of October, 2007.
File No. CA 003-05 L. Kamerman ) Tuesday, the 23rd day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of October, 2007. THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT IN THE MATTER OF An appeal to the Minister pursuant to subsection
More informationARBITRATION APPEAL PROCEDURE OF MICHIGAN
Daniel #2 ARBITRATION APPEAL PROCEDURE OF MICHIGAN IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN: EMPLOYER and EMPLOYEE Gr. Termination 7/29/96 ARBITRATOR: WILLIAM P. DANIEL FACTS The claimant worked as a Switch
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY (the Company ) and TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY (the Company ) and TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE (the Union ) GRIEVANCE CONCERNING THE CANCELLATION OF THE PITT MEADOWS, B.C.
More informationScreaming Eagles R/C Club, Inc. AMA Charter Club Number 298 Plainfield, Indiana
Official Documents Constitution By-Laws 1 CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I NAME The name of the club shall be SCREAMING EAGLES RADIO CONTROL CLUB, INC. ARTICLE II PURPOSE The purpose of this club shall be to further
More informationCanadian Triton International, Ltd. (Assignees of) v. National Iranian Oil Co.
Canadian Triton International, Ltd. (Assignees of) v. National Iranian Oil Co. Between Crown Resources Corporation S.A. and Ata Olfati, as Assignees of the Estate of Canadian Triton International, Ltd.,
More informationAGREEMENT. GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Represented by the BC Public Service Agency (the Employer )
AGREEMENT BETWEEN: GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Represented by the BC Public Service Agency (the Employer ) AND: BRITISH COLUMBIA CROWN COUNSEL ASSOCIATION (the Association ) WITH RESPECT
More informationPolice Service Act 2009
Police Service Act 2009 SAMOA POLICE SERVICE ACT 2009 Arrangement of Provisions PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation PART 2 THE SAMOA POLICESERVICE 3. Continuation of the
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN INTEREST ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO THE FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION ACT, The Corporation of the Town of Oakville.
BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF AN INTEREST ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO THE FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION ACT, 1997 The Corporation of the Town of Oakville and ( Town ) Oakville Professional Fire Fighters Association
More informationONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 25. Jurisdictional Disputes in the construction industry
ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 25 Jurisdictional Disputes in the construction industry This Information Bulletin describes the procedures that must be followed when a party applies
More informationOFFICE OF THE INFORMATION & PRIVACY COMMISSIONER for Prince Edward Island. Order No. FI Re: Department of Communities, Land, and Environment
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION & PRIVACY COMMISSIONER for Prince Edward Island Order No. FI-16-004 Re: Department of Communities, Land, and Environment Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner
More informationRobin MacKay Mayra Perez-Leclerc. Publication No C7-E 20 July 2016
Bill C-7: An Act to amend the Public Service Labour Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board Act and other Acts and to provide for certain other measures Publication No.
More informationCase: 1:98-cv Document #: 715 Filed: 02/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:6638
Case: 1:98-cv-05596 Document #: 715 Filed: 02/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:6638 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ARTHUR L. LEWIS, JR., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationDIRECTIONS IN RELATION TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST
DIRECTIONS IN RELATION TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST On May 9, 2007, counsel for the OPP sought directions from me on the issue of whether certain documents are an impediment to the Ontario Provincial
More informationJUDGMENT. P (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent)
Michaelmas Term [2017] UKSC 65 On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 2 JUDGMENT P (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent) before Lady Hale Lord Kerr Lord Wilson Lord Reed Lord Hughes
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationDate Issued: October 25, 2013 File: Indexed as: Bratzer v. Victoria Police Department and others, 2013 BCHRT 266
Date Issued: October 25, 2013 File: 11280 Indexed as: Bratzer v. Victoria Police Department and others, 2013 BCHRT 266 B E T W E E N: A N D: IN THE MATTER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS CODE R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 210
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT J. WILSON, KARAKATSANIS, AND BRYANT JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star and Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2010 ONSC 991 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 34/09 DATE: 20100326 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL
More informationDomestic Violence Victims Protection Bill
Domestic Violence Victims Protection Bill 215 1 Report of the Justice Committee May 2018 Contents Recommendation... 2 About the bill as introduced... 2 Lack of agreement on possible amendments... 2 New
More informationAN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SNOW LAKE #2309 (hereinafter called the "District") - and -
IN THE MATTER OF: AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SNOW LAKE #2309 (hereinafter called the "District") - and - THE UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 8262 (hereinafter called the "Union")
More informationThe Duty to Assist: A Comparative Study
Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada Commissariat à l'information du Canada The Duty to Assist: A Comparative Study Legal Services May 2008 Table of Contents Summary Chart Comparative Research
More informationC.-S. v. ILO. 124th Session Judgment No. 3884
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal Registry s translation, the French text alone being authoritative. C.-S. v. ILO 124th
More informationL. Kamerman ) Tuesday, the 4th day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of May, THE OIL, GAS AND SALT RESOURCES ACT
File No. OG 002-02 L. Kamerman ) Tuesday, the 4th day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of May, 2004. THE OIL, GAS AND SALT RESOURCES ACT IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 8(1) of the Oil, Gas and Salt Resources
More informationEmployee Relations Act 1992
No. 83 of 1992 TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY MATTERS Section 1. Purposes 2. Commencement 3. Objects 4. Definitions 5. Governor in Council may declare body to be a public body 6. Act binds the
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION. Under. THE PUBLIC SERVICE ACT Before THE PUBLIC SERVICE GRIEVANCE BOARD. Oral Binda. - and -
Public Service Grievance Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission des griefs de la fonction publique Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest
More informationc 96 The Public Service Amendment Act, 1972
Ontario: Annual Statutes 1972 c 96 The Public Service Amendment Act, 1972 Ontario Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1972 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ontario_statutes
More informationKARNATAKA ACT NO. 21 OF 2003 THE KARNATKA LAND REVENUE (AMENDMENT) ACT, Arrangement of Sections
215 KARNATAKA ACT NO. 21 OF 2003 THE KARNATKA LAND REVENUE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 Sections: Arrangement of Sections 1. Short title and commencement 2. Amendment of section 4 3. Amendment of section 6 4.
More informationCANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS. AND IN THE MATTER OF A FORMAL ARBITRATION GRIEVANCE NO s S
IN THE MATTER OF A FORMAL ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CANADA POST CORPORATION AND: CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS AND IN THE MATTER OF A FORMAL ARBITRATION GRIEVANCE NO s. 626-07-2-094-98-S SOLE ARBITRATOR
More informationIMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ORDINANCE D8. THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE This Ordinance is made pursuant to Part III of the Appendix to the College s Statutes
IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ORDINANCE D8 THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE This Ordinance is made pursuant to Part III of the Appendix to the College s Statutes INTRODUCTION 1. This Disciplinary Procedure shall apply
More informationLARRIMAC GOLF CLUB A BY-LAW RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF THE AFFAIRS OF LE CLUB DE GOLF DE LARRIMAC GOLF CLUB Inc.
LARRIMAC GOLF CLUB A BY-LAW RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF THE AFFAIRS OF LE CLUB DE GOLF DE LARRIMAC GOLF CLUB Inc. EFFECTIVE DATE: Special General Meeting of September 11, 2013. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between KERRON MOE. And GARY HARPER
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No CV 2012-03569 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between KERRON MOE And Claimant GARY HARPER BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER A. RAJKUMAR APPEARANCES Mr. St.
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION. Docket No. SN SYNOPSIS
P.E.R.C. NO. 2018-37 STATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Petitioner, -and- Docket No. SN-2018-019
More informationCONSTITUTION 1 THE CLUB
CONSTITUTION 1 THE CLUB 1.1 That the Club be called Runcorn Rowing Club, hereinafter known as the Club, and the colours be royal blue and two white bands. 2 OBJECTIVE The objective of the Club is the advancement
More informationBill 47, The Making Ontario Open for Business Act, 2018 What does it do to Labour & Employment Laws in Ontario? BACKGROUND
Bill 47, The Making Ontario Open for Business Act, 2018 What does it do to Labour & Employment Laws in Ontario? BACKGROUND In 2015, Ontario s Minister of Labour appointed C. Michael Mitchell and John C.
More informationFlorida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications
Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators Part I. Mediator Qualifications Rule 10.100. General Qualifications Certification Requirements (a) General. For certification as a county court,
More informationAppeal No. MA L. Kamerman ) Friday, the 15th day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of July, 1994.
Appeal No. MA 019-93 L. Kamerman ) Friday, the 15th day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of July, 1994. THE MINING ACT IN THE MATTER OF An application under section 105 of the Mining Act in respect of Mining
More informationNORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT'S CONTRACT
NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT'S CONTRACT It is hereby agreed by and between the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Norwich, County of Chenango, in the State
More information2017 REVIEW OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF PRIVACY ACT (FIPPA) COMMENTS FROM MANITOBA OMBUDSMAN
2017 REVIEW OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF PRIVACY ACT (FIPPA) COMMENTS FROM MANITOBA OMBUDSMAN 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 1. Duty to Document 4 2. Proactive Disclosure 6 3. Access
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
COURT FILE NO.: DC06-0065ML DATE: 20070209 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT B E T W E E N: NIAGARA ESCARPMENT COMMISSION Appellant - and - PALETTA REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF HALTON CITY
More informationGuide for Municipalities
APPENX B: Unreasonable Invasion of Priva Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Guide for Municipalities October 2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Overview of Public Documents... 7 Adopted
More informationIAFF LEGAL SERVICES IAFF GENERAL COUNSEL S OFFICE SUMMARY OF POLICIES GOVERNING ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY THE
IAFF LEGAL SERVICES IAFF GENERAL COUNSEL S OFFICE Thomas A. Woodley, General Counsel Douglas L. Steele, Legal Counsel Michael Keefe, Assistant Legal Counsel Nicole M. Gonzalez, Assistant Legal Counsel
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00452/17 MARCH 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00452/17 MARCH 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all material information from Police
More informationL. Kamerman ) Monday, the 23rd day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of April, 2007.
File No. CA 003-05 L. Kamerman ) Monday, the 23rd day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of April, 2007. THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT IN THE MATTER OF An appeal to the Minister pursuant to subsection
More informationCANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO Heard in Edmonton, March 14, Concerning CANADIAN PACIFIC.
CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO. 4619 Heard in Edmonton, March 14, 2018 Concerning CANADIAN PACIFIC And TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE DISPUTE: Appeal of the dismissal
More informationTHE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION BILL, Arrangement of Clauses PART I PRELIMINARY PART II
THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION BILL, 1999 Arrangement of Clauses PART I PRELIMINARY Clause: 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Interpretation 4. Application of Act PART II ESTABLISHMENT, COMPOSITION
More informationUniform Arbitration Act
2-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Act 2-2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY MATTERS 1 Definitions 2 Application of Act 3 Contracting out 4 Waiver of right to object 5 agreements COURT INTERVENTION
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Petitioner, vs. LINDA A. JOHNSON, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-2-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationARTICLE 10 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
ARTICLE 10 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES 10.1 The purpose of this Article is to provide a prompt and effective procedure for the resolution of disputes. The procedures hereinafter set forth shall, except for matters
More informationARTICLE 28 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND ARBITRATION
ARTICLE 28 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND ARBITRATION 28.1 Policy. The purpose of the Article is to provide for the consideration and resolution of grievances. (a) The procedures in this Article shall be the
More informationSELF-EXECUTING RlJL. The consequences of self-executing rules can be se-
SELF-EXECUTING RlJL There are a few rules in almost every agreement which provide that when a given circumstance occurs, certain specific results must automatically follow. Most such rules simply state
More informationElliott H. Goldstein, Referee. (American Train Dispatchers Association PARTIES TO DISPUTE: ( --_~ ~- (St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award Number 26593 THIRD DIVISION Docket Number W-26311 Elliott H. Goldstein, Referee (American Train Dispatchers Association PARTIES TO DISPUTE: ( --_~ ~- (St. Louis
More informationCANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO Heard in Montreal, January 11, Concerning
CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO. 4528 Heard in Montreal, January 11, 2017 Concerning CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY And TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE MAINTENANCE
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00641-CV North East Independent School District, Appellant v. John Kelley, Commissioner of Education Robert Scott, and Texas Education Agency,
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY (the "Company") -and-
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY (the "Company") -and- SYSTEM COUNCIL NO. 11 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL (the "Union") RE: JOB POSTING UNDER ARTICLE
More information2013 No. POLICE. The Police Service of Scotland (Conduct) Regulations 2013
2 nd DRAFT 13 DECEMBER 2012 SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. POLICE The Police Service of Scotland (Conduct) Regulations 2013 Made - - - - *** Laid before Parliament *** Coming into force - - ***
More informationCONSITUTION OF JINGILI BMX CLUB. The name of the incorporated association shall be JINGILI BMX CLUB Incorporated hereinafter referred to as the club.
1 Name CONSITUTION OF JINGILI BMX CLUB The name of the incorporated association shall be JINGILI BMX CLUB Incorporated hereinafter referred to as the club. 2 Objects and purposes The objects and purposes
More informationTerms and Conditions of Service:
Terms and Conditions of Service: Research Staff Page 1 of 19 Contents Page 1. Application of these Terms and Conditions... 3 2. General Conditions... 3 3. Equal Opportunities... 3 4. Trade Union Rights...
More informationJohnstone & Cowling llp
Johnstone & Cowling llp Subject Officers Must Attend at Hearings Despite Being on LTD Subject officers in police disciplinary proceedings have often claimed an inability to attend hearings while being
More informationFollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 2004 Oakland Town Charter Oakland (Me.) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs
More informationIC Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits
IC 22-4-17 Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits IC 22-4-17-1 Rules; mass layoffs; extended benefits; posting Sec. 1. (a) Claims for benefits shall be made in accordance with rules adopted by the department.
More informationCONSOLIDATED NO.1 (as amended by No. 3 and 5) OF THE OTTAWA LIONS TRACK AND FIELD CLUB INC. ARTICLE ONE GENERAL
CONSOLIDATED NO.1 (as amended by No. 3 and 5) OF THE OTTAWA LIONS TRACK AND FIELD CLUB INC. ARTICLE ONE GENERAL Section 1.1 Section 1.2 NAME The name of the Corporation shall be the OTTAWA LIONS TRACK
More informationCollege of Chiropodists v. Peter Wilson Summary of the Decision of the Panel of the Discipline Committee
College of Chiropodists v. Peter Wilson Summary of the Decision of the Panel of the Discipline Committee Summary - This matter came on for hearing on April 24, 2003. The Discipline Panel considered the
More informationIn the Provincial Court of Alberta
In the Provincial Court of Alberta Citation: Savoie v. Alberta Union of Provincial Employees, 2012 ABPC 31 Between: Richard John Savoie - and - The Alberta Union of Provincial Employees Date: 20120131
More informationAn Act to amend the Charter of the French language
FIRST SESSION THIRTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE Bill 171 (2000, chapter 57) An Act to amend the Charter of the French language Introduced 15 November 2000 Passage in principle 1 December 2000 Passage 13 December
More informationAPSO Code of Ethical & Professional Practice (Appendix 1 of the Constitution, hereinafter referred to as the Code)
INTRODUCTION APSO Code of Ethical & Professional Practice (Appendix 1 of the Constitution, hereinafter referred to as the Code) The aim of this Code is to set the standards by which members will achieve
More informationCANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO Heard in Montreal, Wednesday, 13 July Concerning
CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO. 4028 Heard in Montreal, Wednesday, 13 July 2011 Concerning VIA RAIL CANADA INC. And TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE DISPUTE: The dismissal
More informationFACULTY SERVICE OFFICER AGREEMENT
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA FACULTY SERVICE OFFICER AGREEMENT July 2017 Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Comprehensive Collective Bargaining and Strike/Lockout Activity reached between
More information