Johnstone & Cowling llp
|
|
- Corey Simmons
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Johnstone & Cowling llp J&C POST June 2014 VOL 6 NO. 2 OCPC Allows Motion to Defer When Criminal Litigation is Pending In the recent case of Noor Khan v. York Regional Police Service, the Ontario Civilian Police Commission (the OCPC ) allowed a motion to defer its proceedings while the appellant concentrated on criminal litigation involving the same incident. Constable Noor Khan ( Cst. Khan ) was found guilty of discreditable conduct, deceit and two counts of insubordination at a hearing before Superintendent Graeme Turl. At a subsequent hearing on penalty, Cst. Khan was ordered to resign within 7 days or be dismissed. The misconduct alleged at the disciplinary hearing related to interactions between Cst. Khan and RC on January 27, At a criminal trial relating to the same conduct, Cst. Khan was found guilty of sexually assaulting RC. At the time of the motion before the OCPC, Cst. Khan had not been criminally sentenced for the sexual assault conviction and maintained his appellate rights. Cst. Khan brought a motion to extend the time to perfect his appeal before the OCPC until the conclusion of all criminal litigation relating to the events of January 27, Counsel for Cst. Khan made submissions arguing that it would be unfair and costly for the OCPC to force Cst. Khan to continue with the appeal until his criminal litigation had been completed.
2 The OCPC agreed with the submissions from Cst. Khan s counsel. The Commission held that since the criminal case and the disciplinary appeal arose from the same incident, the disciplinary appeal should be heard upon completion of the criminal proceedings. The OCPC explained that in coming to its, it relied on the Supreme Court of Canada s decision of Toronto v. C.U.P.E. 79. In that case the Supreme Court articulated that when a lower tribunal and a criminal court are dealing with the same facts, the criminal proceeding takes precedence. The Commission granted the motion and directed Cst. Khan s counsel to inform the Commission once the criminal proceedings were complete. This case offers a reminder that Tribunals will show deference to criminal proceedings when the same set of facts are at issue. Dryden Police Service Board Gets Permission to Contract Out Communications The OCPC has given the Dryden Police Services Board (the Board ) permission to shift its communications operations to the Owen Sound Police Service ( Owen Sounds P.S. ). The Board brought an application pursuant to section 40 of the Police Services Act ( PSA ), in order to terminate the employment of its communications staff. The Board entered into negotiations with the Owen Sound P.S. to contract out its communication services. Accordingly, the Board sought permission to terminate eight full-time communication employees, one full time communication supervisor, and four part-time employees (the Effected Employees ). The proposal from the Board was delivered to the OCPC, on December 5, Subject to the consent of the OCPC the Board negotiated a five year police dispatch and 911 call-taking agreement with the Owen Sound P.S. to provide their dispatch and communication needs. The proposal outlined the financial difficulties facing the City of Dryden and the Board. The communication centre s annual deficit was described as too large a financial burden. The proposal articulated the efforts that were made by the Board in order to reach an agreement that could have kept the communication centre in the City of Dryden. The Board traced the breakdown in arbitration between itself and the effected employees. It further referred to the options the Board considered, culminating in the Board s decision to close the Communications Centre effective March 31, The Board also held a community consultation meeting in order to elicit feedback from the community regarding its proposal. When an application for termination pursuant to section 40 of the PSA has been made, the OCPC has developed a practice of holding a public meeting with the affected community in order to give the residents an opportunity to comment on the termination proposal. The OCPC held its own public meeting. At the meeting the panel members advised the attendees that there were two concerns about which the OCPC must be satisfied: 1) That after the closure of the Dryden Communications Centre, and after contracting out the Dryden Police Service s (the Service ) communications and dispatch functions to the Owen Sound P.S., the Service will continue to deliver adequate and effective policing in the community; and 2) That the effected employees receive fair severance packages. The Mayor of Dryden, the Chair of the Board, counsel for the Board, and the Chief of the Service all made submissions to the OCPC, outlining the need for
3 contracting out the services, while guaranteeing that the affected employees would get appropriate severance packages. They further articulated that other similar communities had contracted out their services to the Owen Sound P.S. and have had very positive results. Finally the Chief of the Owen Sound P.S. assured the panel that they could meet the May 27, 2014 deadline. In its decision, the OCPC concluded that the Board had presented a sound rationale in support of its position. The OCPC was satisfied that the Service would be able to continue to provide adequate and effective policing once they outsourced their communication services to the Owen Sound P.S. Owing to an agreement between the Association representing the Effected Employees and the Board regarding severance packages, the Commission was satisfied that it did not need to comment on that issue. The Commission consented to the Board s proposal. This case is a succinct re-iteration of the proper processes that must be followed pursuant to the PSA in order for a Police Services Board under section 40 of the PSA. Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Judicial Review Procedure For OIPRD Decisions In Endicott v. Ontario (Independent Police Review Office), the Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that a decision made by the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (the OIPRD ) to dismiss an investigation, amounts to a statutory power of decision. It also clarified what material must be included in a record of proceedings upon a judicial review of the decision. The respondent, Claire Endicott, is an elderly woman in her 70s, who suffered from a neurodegenerative disorder. In April 2011, Ms. Endicott ordered a helium hood from the United States, which is a device that is used to aid in suicide. Members of the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation became aware of Ms. Endicott s order of the helium hood and contacted the Toronto Police Services ( TPS ). TPS dispatched officers to make contact with Ms. Endicott at her Toronto residence. She was not at her home at the time, as she was spending time at a cabin in Muskoka. According to Ms. Endicott the TPS officers spoke to her neighbours and obtained the phone number of her son and the phone number to her cabin. Shortly thereafter, two Ontario Provincial Police ( OPP ) officers arrived at the Muskoka residence and allegedly demanded that Ms. Endicott accompany them. After an hour-long standoff, she agreed to be taken by ambulance to be examined in hospital. The doctor who examined her found that she was cooperative and that she did not have any suicidal intentions. In the weeks that followed, Ms. Endicott filed two separate complaints with the OIPRD. Following both complaints the OIPRD sent letters to Ms. Endicott saying that there were no violations of the Police Services Act ( PSA ) and therefore it was closing its file concerning her complaints. On February 1, 2012, Ms. Endicott brought an application for judicial review of the OIPRD s decision not to retain her complaints. The OIPRD conceded that the decision was subject to judicial review; however, it was argued that the decision did not involve the exercise of a statutory power of decision as defined in the Judicial Review Procedure Act ( JRPA ). Accordingly, the OIPRD argued that it was not required to produce a record of proceedings (the Record ) as contemplated by s. 10 of the JRPA.
4 The Court identified two issues for consideration: 1. Whether or not the decision involved exercising a statutory power of decision as defined in the JRPA and therefore subject to producing a record of proceedings. 2. If he is subject to producing a record of proceedings, what records would need to be included therein. Prior to being heard at the Court of Appeal, this case was heard twice at the Divisional Court level, in front of a single judge and subsequently in front of a threejudge panel. Both the one judge and three judge panels agreed that the Director was invoking a statutory power of decision as defined by the JRPA, but differed on what material must be included in the Record. The panel of the Divisional Court held that a proper Record would include all documents that concerned the complaint. Before the Court of Appeal, the OIPRD argued that the lower courts erred when interpreting the PSA provisions. It was argued that the complainant did not have a right to have her complaint deal with, rather, the PSA gives the OIPRD broad statutory discretion to screen out complaints. The OIPRD contended that, a decision to screen out a complaint did not constitute an exercise of a statutory power. The Court of Appeal disagreed with the OIPRD s postion, upholding the interpretation of the Divisional Court: a proper reading of the relevant statutory provisions makes it clear that a person who lodges a complaint has the right to have that complaint pursued unless a decision is taken by the Director pursuant to the PSA that the complaint should be screened out. The complainant s right to have the complaint pursued is thereby ended, in other words the complainant s legal right is thereby decided. The Court of Appeal clarified that while a complainant has the right to have their complaint dealt with, it is within the power of the OIPRD to then decide whether or not the complaint should be investigated further, or whether it should be screened out pursuant to s. 60 of the PSA. Accordingly the Court found that the OIPRD was subject to s. 10 of the JRPA and therefore required to provide a Record. With respect to what should be included in the Record, the Court disagreed with the Divisional Court. The Court of Appeal held that the Record need not include all documents that were before the OIPRD concerning the complaint. Instead the Court articulated a more contextual approach, finding that the contents of a Record could differ substantially depending on the particular matter being decided. In this particular case, the Court found that the Record must include: 1. The complaint form and any attachments provided by the complainant; 2. The reasons for decision; and 3. Information from the Director s files that is directly relevant to or was part of the screening decision and is not subject to solicitor/client privilege, deliberative secrecy or statutory confidentiality. The Court opined, that to include anything more than the above would be confusing and unnecessarily onerous. The Court did caution that in certain cases, depending on the nature of the complaint, that a Record could be required to contain materials that go beyond the list articulated above. This case offers an important clarification concerning the role of the OIPRD. When choosing to dismiss complaints, the OIPRD is exercising a statutory power of decision. If the decision is subject to a judicial review, the Director will be required to produce a Record. The Court offered a much-needed clarification regarding what documentation the OIPRD will be obligated to provide in these instances.
5 Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Says No Waiting For Judicial Review The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ( HRTO ) recently released a pair of cases where it denied motions to defer applications in order to wait for a judicial review decision. Case #1 In Khan v. Toronto Police Services Board, the HRTO addressed an application by the Toronto Police Services Board (the Board ) to defer the application of Mr. Khan, pending the completion of a judicial review in a different case. Mr. Khan s application, which was commenced on July 3, 2013, alleged that he was discriminated against contrary to the Human Rights Code (the Code ). The alleged incident took place on or around June 20 or 21, 2013, and involved Mr. Khan being arrested and placed in police custody. On July 3, 2013 he made a complaint concerning the incident to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director ( OIPRD ) under the Police Services Act ( PSA ). In a letter from September 2013, the OIPRD instructed Mr. Khan that they would be taking no further action regarding his complaint. In its response to this application, the Board requested that the HRTO defer consideration of the application until there is an outcome of the judicial review in Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario v. de Lottinville ( de Lotinville ). The judicial review stemmed from a trio of applications that were addressed by the HRTO in Claybourn v. Toronto Police Services, a case that was previously reported in the October 2013 J&C LLP Newsletter. In Claybourn the HRTO held that complainants could pursue an application pursuant to the Code, while already having made a complaint to the OIPRD pursuant to the PSA. The HRTO denied the request to defer the application, articulating that it has been consistent in denying all motions to defer in anticipation of the de Lottinville decision. Case #2 In Sivandian v. Toronto Police Services Board, the Tribunal once again considered a request to defer from the Board to await the result in de Lotinville. Like in Khan, the Tribunal denied the request from the Board and instead heard the evidence of Mr. Sivandian. The application stemmed from a March 17, 2012, incident in which the car of Mr. Sivandian was towed from a Tim Horton s parking lot. According to Mr. Sivandian, when he went to retrieve his vehicle from the towing company, he discovered what he believed was new damage to his car. The person at the counter told Mr. Sivandian that the damage would be assessed and he should return to speak with the manager. Mr. Sivandian also asked the clerk at the counter for a copy of the tow card made out by the police officer who authorized the towing of his car. Mr. Sivandian was told if he wanted to retrieve the tow card he would have to request it from the police station. He subsequently made three unsuccessful attempts to retrieve it. On March 19, Mr. Sivandian followed up at the towing company. He alleged that the manager said the towing did not cause the damage to his car and that he would not supply a copy of the tow card. The manager referred him to a police officer that was at the office. Mr. Sivandian spoke with officer Beardsall, who told the applicant that the damage to the car was recorded on the tow card. There was a disagreement between Mr. Sivandian and officer Beardsall about the car s damage. Mr. Sivandian alleged that the officer became angry and walked towards him using abusive language. He alleged that officer Beardsall continued his use of inappropriate language and eventually said that he didn t want to see him again.
6 Following this encounter, Mr. Sivandian went to the police station to file a report. At the station he talked to a sergeant regarding the incident and requested an apology from the officer. Ten months later, he filed a complaint with the OIPRD, which was dismissed. The Board again requested that the HRTO defer consideration of the application until there is an outcome of the judicial review de Lotinville. Again, the HRTO denied this request. These cases highlight the insistence from the HRTO that it will not delay proceedings in order to await the results of an application for judicial review. Johnstone & Cowling llp 441 Jarvis Street, Toronto, Ontario M4Y 2G8 Telephone: Fax:
Johnstone & Cowling llp
Johnstone & Cowling llp Subject Officers Must Attend at Hearings Despite Being on LTD Subject officers in police disciplinary proceedings have often claimed an inability to attend hearings while being
More informationIndemnification of Legal Expenses Denied to. Off-Duty Constable who Used Excessive. Force While Acting as a Private Citizen
In Peel Regional Police Association and Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, the Arbitrator determined whether the Board was correct to deny Constable Szuch indemnification for legal expenses
More informationPublic Complaints About Police
Public Complaints About Police Agenda Background Overview of Complaints Process Investigations OIPRD Powers Police Services Boards CSR and Mediation Questions Office of the Independent Police Review
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE POLICE SERVICES ACT R.S.O. 1990, C.P. 15, as amended: THE TORONTO POLICE SERVICE. - and -
IN THE MATTER OF THE POLICE SERVICES ACT R.S.O. 1990, C.P. 15, as amended: B E T W E E N: THE TORONTO POLICE SERVICE Police Service - and - POLICE CONSTABLE CHRISTOPHER McFADYEN (#10506) Subject Officer
More informationIN THE MATTER OF. Constable Shannon MULVILLE #2045 And Constable Mykhaylo AZARYEV #1915 OF YORK REGIONAL POLICE APPEARANCES
IN THE MATTER OF Constable Shannon MULVILLE #2045 And Constable Mykhaylo AZARYEV #1915 OF YORK REGIONAL POLICE APPEARANCES Mr. Jason Fraser for York Regional Police Ms. Pamela Machado for Constable Shannon
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00668/17 November 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00668/17 November 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all the material information from
More informationThe Office of the Independent Police Review Director 1
The Office of the Independent Police Review Director 1 Making a Complaint About the Police GUIDE AND COMPLAINT FORM The Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) is responsible for receiving,
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00452/17 MARCH 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00452/17 MARCH 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all material information from Police
More informationThe Law Enforcement Review Act Complaint #3704
IN THE MATTER OF: AND IN THE MATTER OF: The Law Enforcement Review Act Complaint #3704 An Application pursuant to s.17(1) of The Law Enforcement Review Act R.S.M. 1987, c.l75 B E T W E E N: J.W.P. ) T.
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00444/17 October 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00444/17 October 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all the material information from
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00423/17 APRIL 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00423/17 APRIL 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all material information from Police
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews [PIRC/00522/17 [MARCH 2018] Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews [PIRC/00522/17 [MARCH 2018] Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all material information from
More informationIN THE MATTER OF ONTARIO REGULATION 123/98 AND AMMENDMENTS THERETO; AND IN THE MATTER OF POLICE CONSTABLE CHRISTIAN NUNGISA #2257 AND THE
IN THE MATTER OF ONTARIO REGULATION 123/98 MADE UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, C.P. 15 AND AMMENDMENTS THERETO; AND IN THE MATTER OF POLICE CONSTABLE CHRISTIAN NUNGISA #2257 AND THE OTTAWA
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC
More informationThe Law Society of Saskatchewan Discipline Decision regarding Drew Ronald Filyk of Regina, Saskatchewan
Background The Law Society of Saskatchewan Discipline Decision 08-01 regarding Drew Ronald Filyk of Regina, Saskatchewan DECIDED: January 4, 2008 The Law Society of Saskatchewan was established in 1907,
More informationIndexed as: R. v. Proulx. Between Her Majesty The Queen, Applicant, and Guy A. Proulx, Respondent. [1988] O.J. No Action No.
Page 1 Indexed as: R. v. Proulx Between Her Majesty The Queen, Applicant, and Guy A. Proulx, Respondent [1988] O.J. No. 890 Action No. 1650/87 Ontario District Court - Algoma District Sault Ste. Marie,
More informationOTTAWA POLICE SERVICE DISCIPLINE HEARING IN THE MATTER OF ONTARION REGULATION 268/10 MADE UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, RSO 1990,
OTTAWA POLICE SERVICE DISCIPLINE HEARING IN THE MATTER OF ONTARION REGULATION 268/10 MADE UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, RSO 1990, AND THE AMENDMENTS THERETO; THE OTTAWA POLICE SERVICE AND CONSTABLE JARRID
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00328/17 APRIL 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00328/17 APRIL 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all material information from Police
More informationSaugeen Shores Police Service Discipline Hearing. In the Matter of Ontario Regulation 268/10. Made Under the Police Services Act, R.S.O.
Saugeen Shores Police Service Discipline Hearing In the Matter of Ontario Regulation 268/10 Made Under the Police Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, And Amendments Thereto: And In The Matter Of Saugeen Shores
More informationAGRICULTURAL LAND COMMISSION PRACTICE DIRECTIVE APPEALS UNDER SECTION 55 OF THE AGRICULTURAL LAND COMMISSION ACT
1 Policy PD-01 December 4, 2014 Agricultural Land Commission Act AGRICULTURAL LAND COMMISSION PRACTICE DIRECTIVE APPEALS UNDER SECTION 55 OF THE AGRICULTURAL LAND COMMISSION ACT BACKGROUND This Practice
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC
More informationOntario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures
Ontario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures Purpose 1. Membership as a Swim Ontario Coach brings with it many benefits and privileges. At the same time, Swim Ontario Member
More informationNoteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT RB Panel: Teresa White Decision Date: March 23, 2005
Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2005-01460-RB Panel: Teresa White Decision Date: March 23, 2005 Extension of time Election Section 10 of the Workers Compensation Act Policy item #111.22 of the
More informationagainst Members of Staff
Procedural Guidance Security Marking: Police Misconduct and Complaints against Members of Staff Not Protectively Marked Please click on the hyperlink for related Policy Statements 1. Introduction 1.1 This
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its sixty-ninth session (22 April-1 May 2014)
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 1 July 2014 A/HRC/WGAD/2014/8 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention GE.14-07114 (E) *1407114* Opinions adopted by the
More informationGuide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures
Guide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures Introduction This guide aims to assist complainants and members to understand ACCA s complaints and disciplinary process. In the event of any conflict
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
1 DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. General 1.1 This is the disciplinary procedure ( Disciplinary Procedure, or Procedure ) and relative regulations ( Regulations ) of The British Association of Snowsport Instructors
More informationA guide to the police complaints system
A guide to the police complaints system Who deals with complaints about the police? The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) oversees the whole of the police complaints system and sets standards
More informationCODE OF CONDUCT FOR MEMBERS OF SASKATOON CITY COUNCIL
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MEMBERS OF SASKATOON CITY COUNCIL 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose Citizens of Saskatoon expect high standards of conduct from all government officials. The quality of the City of Saskatoon
More informationWindsor Police Department General Order
Windsor Police Department General Order Internal Investigations/Citizen Complaints Effective Date: 12/16/2015 POSTC: 1.2.34 a-c, 1.2.33a-e, 2.2.17, 3.2.49, 3.2.64 G.O. 11.01 Classification: Not Classified
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC
More informationMIDDLETOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
MIDDLETOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT SECTION 401 DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES SUBJECT: Issue Date: Effective Date: 10/1/15 Distribution: All Personnel Amends/Rescinds: Review Date: Per Order of Chief of Police: William
More informationLegal Aid Ontario. Privacy policy
Legal Aid Ontario Privacy policy Legal Aid Ontario Privacy policy Title: Privacy policy Author: Legal Aid Ontario, General Counsel Last updated: April 16, 2014 Table of Contents 1. Application of FIPPA...
More informationONTARIO CIVILIAN POLICE COMMISSION
ONTARIO CIVILIAN POLICE COMMISSION DATE: 31 March 2017 FILE: CASE NAME: OCPC 16-ADJ-001 MULVILLE AND AZARYEV AND YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 87(1) OF THE POLICE
More informationCANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO Heard in Calgary, November 16, Concerning CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION CASE NO. 4597 Heard in Calgary, November 16, 2017 Concerning CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY And TEAMSTERS CANADA RAIL CONFERENCE DISPUTE: The Union
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO This decision was followed by an appeal, the results of which can be found at the end of this document. PANEL: Sarah Corkey, RN Chairperson Susan
More informationRugby Ontario Policy Manual
8.1.2 Harassment is a form of discrimination. Harassment is prohibited by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and by human rights legislation in every province and territory of Canada and in its
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Tayside Police
Case reference: PCCS/00491/PF TP March 2010 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Tayside Police under section 35(1) of the Police Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2006 Summary
More informationCriminal Injuries Compensation Board
Guide to: Criminal Injuries Compensation Board What is the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board? The Criminal Injuries Compensation Board ( CICB ) gives money (compensation) to people harmed by violent
More informationMcNeil Disclosure Packages
TRANSIT POLICE MCNEIL DISCLOSURE PACKAGES Effective Date: Interim Policy February 18, 2010 Revised Date: January 31, 2014 Reviewed Date: Review Frequency: As Required Office of Primary Responsibility:
More informationTaking Your Complaint to a Human Rights Tribunal. A handout for complainants with carriage
Taking Your Complaint to a Human Rights Tribunal A handout for complainants with carriage July 2013 Taking your complaint to a Human Rights Tribunal: A handout for complainants with carriage The Alberta
More informationClergy Discipline Rules 2005 a as amended b
Clergy Discipline Rules 2005 a as amended b ARRANGEMENT OF RULES 1. Overriding Objective 2. Duty to co-operate 3. Application of rules PART I Introductory PART II Institution of proceedings 4. Institution
More informationDECISION ON REVIEW ON THE RECORD
1 DECISION ON REVIEW ON THE RECORD PURSUANT TO SECTION 141 POLICE ACT, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 267 In the matter of the Review on the Record into the conduct of Constable Ravinder (Rob) Thandi of the Abbotsford
More informationRoster Lawyers Tariff of Fees
Roster Lawyers Tariff of Fees December 7, 2015 Schedule 2 Roster Lawyers Tariff of Fees Table of Contents 1. Criminal Certificates 20 2. Criminal Appeal Certificates 27 3. Civil Certificates 30 4. Administrative
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 26, 2018
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 26, 2018 08/01/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES T. HUTCHINS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 282821
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CRIMINAL) THE QUEEN AND SHAM SANGANOO
. THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CRIMINAL) SAINT LUCIA CRIMINAL CASES NOS. SLUCRD 2007/0653, 0669 & 0670 BETWEEN: THE QUEEN AND SHAM SANGANOO Claimant Defendant Appearances:
More informationNOTICE OF DECISION. AND TO: Chief Constable Police Department. AND TO: Inspector Police Department. AND TO: Sergeant Police Department AND TO:
IN THE MATTER OF THE POLICE ACT, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 367 AND IN THE MATTER OF A REVIEW OF ALLEGATIONS OF DECEIT AND DISCREDITABLE CONDUCT AGAINST CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF DECISION TO:
More informationLaw Enforcement Request for Personal Information Procedures - What to do When a Police Officer Asks for Information
Law Enforcement Request for Personal Information - What to do When a Police Officer Asks for Information Procedure Number: CIMS-P001 Version Number: 1.0 Approval Date: December 16, 2015 City Clerk's Office
More informationOTTAWA POLICE SERVICE DISCIPLINE HEARING IN THE MATTER OF ONTARION REGULATION 268/10 MADE UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, RSO 1990,
OTTAWA POLICE SERVICE DISCIPLINE HEARING IN THE MATTER OF ONTARION REGULATION 268/10 MADE UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, RSO 1990, AND THE AMENDMENTS THERETO; THE OTTAWA POLICE SERVICE AND CONSTABLE PAUL
More informationDECISION AS AMENDED PAT. -and- LE DARREN CONSTABLE SIRIE SAULT RESPONDENTS. -and- OFFICE STATUTORY. Panel: 19, Hearing. September.
OCPC# #12-15 ONTARIO CIVILIAN POLICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, C. P..15, AS AMENDED D BETWEEN: PAT NISBETTT -and- APPELLANT INSPECTOR ART PLUSS SEGEANT JOSEPH TRUDEAU
More informationCriminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016
Police Service of Scotland Police Notebook Form 099-001 (Content) Procedure Under Section 1 (Arrest) (*) (*) (Arrests made under Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000 and Sections 6D or 7(5) of the Road
More information1.4 This code does not attempt to replace the law. The University therefore reserves the right to refer some matters to the police (see section 4).
Code of Discipline for Students and Disciplinary Procedures 1. Overview 1.1 The University exists primarily to provide higher education, to carry out research and to provide the facilities and resources
More informationPolicing and Crime Bill
EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Home Office, are published separately as Bill 134 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS The Home Secretary, Theresa May, has made the
More informationDERBY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE
DERBY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE TITLE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS and CITIZEN PROCEDURE: 6.1 COMPLAINTS ALLEGING POLICE MISCONDUCT EFFECTIVE: 01 JUL 15 REVISED: POST-C STANDARD: 1.2.34; 2.2.17; 2.2.35;
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT
Page 1 of 15 Home Feedback Site Map Français Home Court of Appeal for Ontario Superior Court of Justice Ontario Court of Justice Location Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court Appeal Information Package
More informationL. Kamerman ) Tuesday, the 25th day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of November, 2003.
File No. MA-019-00 L. Kamerman ) Tuesday, the 25th day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of November, 2003. THE MINING ACT IN THE MATTER OF The required Closure Plans regarding mining operations of Noranda
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL
REASONS FOR DECISION OF THE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL Date of Hearing: Panel: Melina Laverty, Chair; Aly N. Alibhai and (Hedy) Anna Walsh, Members Re: Shahid Ali Khan (Report No. 6642) Applicant for a
More information2013 No. POLICE. The Police Service of Scotland (Conduct) Regulations 2013
2 nd DRAFT 13 DECEMBER 2012 SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. POLICE The Police Service of Scotland (Conduct) Regulations 2013 Made - - - - *** Laid before Parliament *** Coming into force - - ***
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPLICANT
Court File No. 12821-15 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : TANNER CURRIE -and- Applicant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, and CHRISTOPHER LABRECHE Respondents FACTUM
More informationRequest a copy of the policy regarding the Victim Right to Review scheme for the Metropolitan Police for decisions made by the Police.
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: I note you seek access to the following information: Request a copy of the policy regarding the Victim Right to Review scheme for the Metropolitan Police for
More informationCONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT
CONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT By Jennifer C. McGarey Secretary and Assistant General Counsel US Airways, Inc. and Tom A. Jerman O
More informationCriminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court
Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court Contents Part 1 Underpinning knowledge...3 1.1 An understanding
More informationGeneral Complaint Procedure December 2012
General Complaint Procedure December 2012 December 2012 1 All Souls Catholic Primary School Rationale General Complaint Procedure The School's Complaints Procedure has a number of stages, and these are
More informationToronto Local Appeal Body Public Guide
Toronto Local Appeal Body Public Guide Revised on August 15, 2017 Contact information: Toronto Local Appeal Body 40 Orchard View Boulevard Suite 211 Toronto, ON M4R 1B9 Tel: (416) 392-4697 Web: www.toronto.ca/tlab
More informationPROTECTION FOR PERSONS IN CARE ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of February 20, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Queen s Printer Bookstore Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationThe New Tricks and Traps of Human Rights Investigations. Association of Corporate Counsel- Ontario Chapter Program
The New Tricks and Traps of Human Rights Investigations Association of Corporate Counsel- Ontario Chapter Program Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP 200 Bay Street, Suite 3800 Toronto, ON June 18, 2013 Overview
More informationCODE OF PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - A (PC-A) COMMITTEES University of Nebraska-Lincoln TABLE OF CONTENTS
CODE OF PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - A (PC-A) COMMITTEES University of Nebraska-Lincoln TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Academic Rights and Responsibilities...1 1.2 Duty of University
More informationCity of New Britain POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY
City of New Britain POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY Number: 1.03 Effective Date: 07/01/84 Revision Date: 03/15/16 TITLE: CITIZEN COMPLAINTS -- I. PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to establish the guidelines
More informationCRICKET SCOTLAND CODE OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
CRICKET SCOTLAND CODE OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY 1.1 Establishment of the Panel and of the Appeals Panel (1) There is hereby established a body to be known as the Cricket Scotland
More informationHOW TO MAKE A FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THE POLICE
HOW TO MAKE A FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THE POLICE In order for us to properly assess your claim we recommend that you make a formal complaint to the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission). Whilst
More informationQUARTERLY REPORT: COMPLAINTS, MISCONDUCT & OTHER MATTERS
QUARTERLY REPORT: COMPLAINTS, MISCONDUCT & OTHER MATTERS Report of the Chief Constable Contact: Detective Superintendent Dean Chapple 1. Purpose of Report 1.2 This report outlines the data and background
More informationTRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS
LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Citation:
More informationCODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS 1 2 CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS DEFINITIONS 1. In this Code, unless the context indicates otherwise any word or phrase defined in the South African
More informationComplaints Policy. A charitable housing association. V:\ADMIN\DTroupes\Working\Chris H\Complaints P&P\Complaints Policy.doc
Complaints Policy Version #: Date: Summary of Changes Version 10 December 2013 Split from Procedure and Panel Guidance; other small changes. Version 9 October 2013 Change to Proc Version 8 March 2013 Changes
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Scott v. British Columbia (The Police Complaint Commissioner), 2017 BCSC 961 Jason Scott Date: 20170609 Docket: S164838 Registry: Vancouver
More informationPolice stations. What happens when you are arrested
Police stations What happens when you are arrested This factsheet looks at what happens at the police station when the police think you have committed a crime. This factsheet may help you if you, or someone
More informationThis code is applicable to all employees of Finbond Mutual Bank, including temporary employees.
POLICY NUMBER 1 DISCIPLINARY CODE OF CONDUCT A) Purpose The Disciplinary Code of Conduct acts as a guide and regulatory tool to both management and employees in the handling of disciplinary matters. The
More informationNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Meeting SPA Complaints and Conduct Committee Date and Time 1400 hours on Wednesday 22 January 2014 Location i2 Office, West Regent Street, Glasgow Title of Paper Complaint Handling Reviews in relation
More information2. During the complaint intake process, no questions shall be asked of a complainant regarding their immigration status.
Distribution: All Personnel Number of Pages: 1 of 11 I. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to comply with Public Act No. 14-166 and to provide a uniform policy to accept, process, investigate, take
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews [PIRC/00479/17] [MAY 2018] Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews [PIRC/00479/17] [MAY 2018] Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all material information from Police
More informationNTSA CUSTOMER COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCEDURE JUNE 2016
NTSA CUSTOMER COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCEDURE JUNE 2016 (i) COMPLAINTS HANDLING PROCEDURE Introduction: This policy provides guidelines for handling complaints. While most complaints should be resolved informally
More informationWhat is the matter with the
Police Discipline in 2013 September 18 & 19, 2013 Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Centre, Mississauga All sessions taking place in the Hazel McCallion Ballroom What is the matter PSA Matters with the
More informationDRAFT. City of Albany. Fourth Quarterly Report August 1, October 31, 2016
City of Albany DRAFT Fourth Quarterly Report August 1, 2016 - October 31, 2016 Submitted by: The Government Law Center of Albany Law School on behalf of the City of Albany Citizens Police Review Board
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES 1. Advice and Guidance 1.1 It is strongly recommended that the advice and guidance of the Employing Authority be sought when any
More information9. Roles and responsibilities of Committee members
9. Overview 9.1. New Committee members are appointed by the BSB s Appointments Board on an annual basis and normally begin their three-year term in January. The roles of members are set out below and further
More informationA POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR MINISTERIAL AND STAFF MISCONDUCT. an MCEC Policy Adopted 02, 20, 2002 Revised September 30, 2008
A POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR MINISTERIAL AND STAFF MISCONDUCT an MCEC Policy Adopted 02, 20, 2002 Revised September 30, 2008 by resolution of the MCEC Executive Council This policy and procedure is intended
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Her Majesty the Queen. and. Christopher Raymond O Halloran. Before: The Honourable Justice Wayne D.
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. O Halloran 2013 PESC 22 Date: 20131029 Docket: S2-GC-130 Registry: Summerside Her Majesty the Queen and Christopher Raymond O Halloran Before: The
More informationPOLICY MANUAL PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND INTERPRETATION OF POLICY. The interpretation of the Code of Conduct will be at the discretion of the Council.
POLICY MANUAL Legal References: Municipal Government Act Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act Local Authorities Election Act Cross References: Procedural Bylaw 3001 Policy department: Council
More informationTHE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT TRIBUNAL OF THE CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO
THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT TRIBUNAL OF THE CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO IN THE MATTER OF a hearing conducted under the Certified General Accountants Association of Ontario BETWEEN:
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO DECISION
HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO B E T W E E N: Amanda Kerr Applicant -and- Global TeleSales of Canada Inc. Respondent DECISION Adjudicator: Eric Whist Date: October 9, 2012 File Number: 2011-09375-I Citation:
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC
More informationWhat Schools Should Know About New Title IX Rules
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com What Schools Should Know About New Title
More informationGINGERBREAD NURSERY SCHOOL CRIMINAL REFERENCE CHECK POLICY Date Effective: May 27, 2016
GINGERBREAD NURSERY SCHOOL CRIMINAL REFERENCE CHECK POLICY Date Effective: May 27, 2016 In the interest of hiring staff and recruiting volunteers with the personal and professional qualifications essential
More informationNOVA SCOTIA POLICE REVIEW BOARD. The Police Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, Chapter 348 and the Regulations made pursuant thereto
DECISION File No. 03-0001 NOVA SCOTIA POLICE REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Police Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, Chapter 348 and the Regulations made pursuant thereto - and - IN THE MATTER OF: An appeal filed
More informationAPPEARANCES Mr E J Hudson for the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No 2 Mr P F Gorringe for Mr XXXX
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2010] NZLCDT 14 LCDT 025/09 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WAIKATO BAY OF PLENTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE No.2 Applicant
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS Indexed as: Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers v Derrick Lawlor, 2018 ONCSWSSW 11 Decision
More informationDISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS IN PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE CASES. Andrew J. Heal
DISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS IN PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE CASES Andrew J. Heal ANDREW J. HEAL, PARTNER HEAL & Co. LLP - 2 - DISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROSECUTION
More informationSPRINGFIELD CONVENT SCHOOL POLICY ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES AND APPEALS
1 SPRINGFIELD CONVENT SCHOOL POLICY ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES AND APPEALS 2 1. DEFINITIONS In this Policy 1.1. Appeals Adjudicator means an independent practising attorney or advocate who is a member
More informationOwen Sound Police Services Board Public Meeting Wednesday, September 26, nd Floor Meeting Room
Owen Sound Police Services Board Public Meeting Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2nd Floor Meeting Room Members Present: Admin. Present: Admin. Absent: Staff Present: Media Present: Public Present: Minutes:
More information