BOARD OF APPEALS. September 21, 2016 AGENDA
|
|
- James Hodges
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BOARD OF APPEALS September 21, 2016 AGENDA DOCKET NO. AP : An appeal made by Edgewood Drive LLC for a variance from the minimum 10 ft. left side yard setback (facing Langley Drive) to 5 ft. and variance from minimum required 13 parking spaces to 6 for construction of an office/warehouse building on property owned by the Appellant and located at 13 North Edgewood Drive, Hagerstown, zoned Business Local - GRANTED DOCKET NO. AP : An appeal made by Brooke s House, Inc. for a special exception to establish a sober living facility on property owned by Downsville Lot C 20 LLC and located at Downsville Pike, Hagerstown, zoned Office, Research & Industry - GRANTED ****************************************************************************** Pursuant to the Maryland Open Meetings Law, notice is hereby given that the deliberations of the Board of Zoning Appeals are open to the public. Furthermore, the Board, at its discretion, may render a decision as to some or all of the cases at the hearing described above or at a subsequent hearing, the date and time of which will be announced prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to contact Kathy Kroboth at Voice, Voice/TDD to make arrangements no later than September 12, Any person desiring a stenographic transcript shall be responsible for supplying a competent stenographer. The Board of Appeals reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Please take note of the Amended Rules of Procedure (Adopted July 5, 2006), Public Hearing, Section 4(d) which states: Applicants shall have ten (10) minutes in which to present their request and may, upon request to and permission of the Board, receive an additional twenty (20) minutes for their presentation. Following the Applicant s case in chief, other individuals may receive three (3) minutes to testify, except in the circumstance where an individual is representing a group, in which case said individual shall be given eight (8) minutes to testify. Those Applicants requesting the additional twenty (20) minutes shall have their case automatically moved to the end of the docket. For extraordinary cause, the Board may extend any time period set forth herein, or otherwise modify or suspend these Rules, to uphold the spirit of the Ordinance and to do substantial justice. Matt Harsh, Chairman Board of Appeals
2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND Edgewood Drive LLC Applicant Appeal No. AP OPINION This action is a request for a variance from the minimum 10 left side yard setback (fronting Langley Drive) to 5 and from the minimum required 13 parking spaces to six spaces for the construction of an office/warehouse building. The subject property is located 13 N. Edgewood Drive, Hagerstown, Maryland; is owned by the Applicant; and is zoned Business Local. The Board held a public hearing on the matter on September 21, No opposition was presented to this request. Findings of Fact Based upon the testimony given, all information and evidence presented, and upon a study of the specific property involved and the neighborhood in which it is located, the Board makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Applicant seeks variances to allow for the construction of a 6,210 ft. 2 office/warehouse building on the subject property. 2. The property is improved with two buildings that will be demolished and replaced with the new building. 3. The building will be used as an accounting office and storage area for operations supporting 21 McDonald s restaurant sites. 4. The same use has occurred at the site for the past eight or nine years, but growth has led to the need for additional space. 5. There are six employees regularly working at this location. 6. There are six existing parking spaces onsite, and additional street parking along Langley Drive. 7. The most-affected neighboring property owner has no objection to the relief requested. (See Exhibit 1.) 1
3 Rationale The Zoning Ordinance requires a left side yard setback of 10 in the Business Local district and calls for 13 parking spaces for the proposed use. Sections 11.5 &22.12(b)(1). This Board has authority to grant a variance upon a showing of practical difficulty or undue hardship (c) and Practical Difficulty may be found by the Board when: (1) strict compliance would unreasonably prevent the use of the property for a permitted purpose or render conformance unnecessarily burdensome; and (2) denying the variances would do substantial injustice to the applicant and a lesser relaxation than that applied for would not give substantial relief; and (3) granting the variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and secure public safety and welfare (A). The grant of the requested variances are appropriate given the circumstances presented here. The Applicant has demonstrated a practical difficulty if strict compliance with the Ordinance was required. The use of the property as proposed is permitted. Strict compliance with the Ordinance would require a reduction in the size of the building (thereby thwarting the purpose of the expansion which is to achieve the space necessary to adequately accommodate business operations) or the creation of unneeded parking areas. Unused and excess parking spaces would increase stormwater runoff from the property and serve no practical purpose. Given the size and shape of the lot and the business necessity determining the size of the proposed structure, a lesser setback relaxation is impracticable. Moreover, the lot size (and hence, the building envelope) was reduced when the SHA acquired property for a roadway expansion that never occurred. Finally, as six employees are regularly at the site, and as overflow parking is available along Langley Drive, we are confident that the parking space reduction variance will not undermine the intent of the Ordinance. For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the grant of the requested relief observes the spirt of the Ordinance and secures public safety and welfare. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby GRANTED by a vote of 5 0. Date Issued: October 21, 2016 BOARD OF APPEALS By: Neal Glessner, Vice Chair 1 When the terms unnecessary hardship (or one of its synonyms) and practical difficulties are framed in the disjunctive ( or ), Maryland courts generally have applied the more restrictive hardship standard to use variances, while applying the less restrictive practical difficulties standard to area variances because use variances are viewed as more drastic departures from zoning requirements. Belvoir Farms Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. North, 355 Md. 259, 276 n.10 (1999) (citations omitted). 2
4 BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND Brooke s House, Inc. Applicant Appeal No. AP OPINION This action is a request for a special exception to establish a sober living facility. The subject property is located at Downsville Pike, Hagerstown, Maryland; is owned by the Downsville Lot C 20 LLC; and is zoned Office, Research & Industry. The Board held a public hearing on the matter on September 21, No opposition was presented to this request. Findings of Fact Based upon the testimony given, all information and evidence presented, and upon a study of the specific property involved and the neighborhood in which it is located, the Board makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Applicant seeks a special exception to establish a sober living facility on the subject property. 2. The property is approximately 20 acres in area, and a five- or six-acre parcel will be subdivided to create the site for the proposed facility. The precise location of the lot will be determined as site engineering progresses. 3. The proposed facility is a structured residential setting for those recovering from drug addiction. 4. The structure is proposed to be approximately 8,300 ft. 2 in area, with eight doubleoccupancy living units; common areas for dining, meetings, and counselling; and office and library areas for facility administration and individual training and education. 5. The facility is meant to provide a coordinated and intentional recovery setting for residents after they have completed medical detoxification, an inpatient treatment program, and a halfway house stay. 6. It will have curfews and house rules governing residents. 7. Length of stay is estimated to be from three to twelve months. 1
5 8. Neither onsite nursing care nor counselling will be provided, but one to four fulltime employees and two to three part-time employees are expected to support the recovery process and operate the facility. 9. The use conforms to the Plan and will be compatible with the existing neighborhood. The existing neighborhood is sparsely populated; has few, if any residential uses; and has commercial uses in the immediate proximity, including a construction company and a satellite dish telecommunications installation. Rationale The Board has authority to grant a special exception pursuant to Section 25.2(b) of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, Maryland. A special exception is defined as a grant of a specific use that would not be appropriate generally or without restriction; and shall be based upon a finding that the use conforms to the plan and is compatible with the existing neighborhood. Article 28A. In the Office, Research, and Industry (ORI) zone, a special exception may be granted for any other use that the Board finds functionally similar to any principal permitted or special exception use allowed in the ORI zone. Section 21B.2(e). The ORI zone is to provide appropriate locations for a broader mixture of uses than are permitted in the ORT or other industrial districts. Section 21B.0. The permitted uses can be compatible amongst themselves and with adjacent development due to a low level of nuisance inherent in the use or through required strict adherence to specific performance standards. Id. We are persuaded that the use falls within the purpose of the ORI zone. It has a low level of nuisance inherent in the use and will not promote incompatibility with adjacent uses. We conclude that a sober living facility is functionally similar to educational institutions including, but not limited to, business and trade schools and colleges and hospitals, including other health related facilities but not including nursing and residential care facilities. These uses are principal permitted uses in the zone. While there are admittedly some obvious distinctions between the identified principal permitted uses and the proposed use, there are functional similiarties as well. The use will have a residential component with shared common areas, just as one would find at trade schools and colleges. Likewise, other health related facilities (but not nursing or residential care facilities) contemplate the coming and going of patients as they seek services to improve their health, just as is proposed with this sober living facility. The residents will be expected to secure jobs during their recovery progresses and travel to counseling and other health-related appointments. The facility will not be locked. Thus, residents will leave the facility for work or counselling and then return to it for recovery 2
6 support and residence. This site is remote from downtown areas, thus providing a secluded and buffered location for recovery efforts. It is remote from other residential uses and is surrounded by undeveloped land, a construction company headquarters, and a satellite dish facility. The use is compatible with the neighborhood and conforms to the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. There was no evidence showing that the use would have any greater adverse effects above and beyond those inherently associated with such a special exception use irrespective of its location within the zone. Schultz v. Pritts, 291 Md. 1, 15 (1981). Rather, this site and its surrounding uses suggest that it will have a lesser impact here than it would in a more-developed area of an ORI zone. As such, the grant of the special exception is warranted. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby GRANTED by a vote of 5 0. Date Issued: October 21, 2016 BOARD OF APPEALS By: Neal Glessner, Vice Chair 3
BOARD OF APPEALS April 11, County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington St., Meeting Room 2000, Hagerstown, at 7:00 p.m.
BOARD OF APPEALS April 11, 2018 County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington St., Meeting Room 2000, Hagerstown, at 7:00 p.m. AGENDA DOCKET NO. AP2018-008: An appeal made by Mark W. & Billie Jo Sellers
More informationBOARD OF APPEALS. January 6, 2016 AGENDA
BOARD OF APPEALS January 6, 2016 AGENDA DOCKET NO. AP2015-040: An appeal made by Meridian Leitersburg LLC for a variance from minimum 25-ft. left side yard setback to 7-ft. for bank drive-thru canopy on
More informationBOARD OF APPEALS. October 19, 2016 AGENDA
BOARD OF APPEALS October 19, 2016 AGENDA DOCKET NO. AP2016-039: An appeal made by Oscar Hall, Jr. for an appeal from the Planning Commission s denial of a one lot subdivision for a proposed lot without
More informationBOARD OF APPEALS January 10, 2018 AGENDA
January 10, 2018 AGENDA DOCKET NO. AP2017-051: An appeal made by St. Marks Episcopal Church for a variance from 25 ft. from street right of way to 10 ft. for placement of a freestanding sign on property
More informationBOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. April 4, LOCATION: Washington County Court House, Court Room 1, 24 Summit Avenue, Hagerstown 7:00 p.m.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS April 4, 2018 LOCATION: Washington County Court House, Court Room 1, 24 Summit Avenue, Hagerstown 7:00 p.m. AGENDA DOCKET NO. AP2017-031: An appeal made by the Estate of Ned Amsley,
More informationVARIANCE STAFF REPORT
2017-V-50 Page 1 of 8 VARIANCE STAFF REPORT Docket Number: 2017-V-50 Applicant/Property Owner: Spirit Master Funding, LLC 2001 Joshua Road Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2431 Public Hearing Date: December 14,
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER S
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0110-S VERIZON WIRELESS AND THOMAS AND IMOGENE BROWN, TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS A. AND IMOGENE BROWN TRUST DATED JULY 2, 1984 SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
More informationARTICLE 26 AMENDMENT PROCEDURES
Adopted 5-20-14 ARTICLE 26 AMENDMENT PROCEDURES Sections: 26-1 General Authority and Procedure 26-2 Conditional Use Permits 26-3 Table of Lesser Change 26-4 Fees for Rezonings and Conditional Use Permits
More informationROBERT W. WOJCIK AND DEBORAH A. WOJCIK
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0258-V ROBERT W. WOJCIK AND DEBORAH A. WOJCIK THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JANUARY 7, 2016 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationWILLIAM M. HUGEL AND ANNAMARIE HUGEL
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0144-V WILLIAM M. HUGEL AND ANNAMARIE HUGEL THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationARTICLE 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AND ENFORCEMENT
ARTICLE 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AND ENFORCEMENT Section 1501 Brule County Zoning Administrator An administrative official who shall be known as the Zoning Administrator and who shall be designated
More informationMINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE OWOSSO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY OF OWOSSO MAY 16, 2017 AT 9:30 A.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE OWOSSO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY OF OWOSSO MAY 16, 2017 AT 9:30 A.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairman Randy Horton at 9:30
More informationVariance Application Checklist
Variance Application Checklist Completed application form Completed Criteria for a Variance sheet, addressing the five items set forth by the New Hampshire Supreme Court governing the granting of Variances.
More informationRUSSELL PROPERTIES, LLC
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0222-V RUSSELL PROPERTIES, LLC SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: NOVEMBER 17, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
More information(b) A concurring vote of a majority of the membership of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be necessary to constitute board action.
Article XXII Chapter 1 ARTICLE XXII ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Sec. 20-2200 Composition. There is hereby established a Township Zoning Board of Appeals to be composed of five (5) members. One (1) of these
More informationRESOLUTION TO AMEND UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
GORDON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA RESOLUTION TO AMEND UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Whereas, The Gordon County Board of Commissioners recognizes that farming is a large part of the history and heritage of
More informationCITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals
CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals An appeal(s) from the decision of the Administrative
More informationEAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE XXII ZONING HEARING BOARD
EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE XXII ZONING HEARING BOARD SECTION 2201 GENERAL A. Appointment. 1. The Zoning Hearing Board shall consist of three (3) residents of the Township appointed
More informationARTICLE 2. ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 20 AUTHORITY OF REVIEWING/DECISION MAKING BODIES AND OFFICIALS Sections: 20.1 Board of County Commissioners.
Article. ADMINISTRATION 0 0 ARTICLE. ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 0 AUTHORITY OF REVIEWING/DECISION MAKING BODIES AND OFFICIALS Sections: 0. Board of County Commissioners. 0. Planning Commission. 0. Board of
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 9, 2006 DATE: December 6, 2006 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT REVISED ORDINANCE SUBJECT: Amendment to Section 36. Administration and Procedures
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0223-V VERIZON WIRELESS AND THOMAS AND IMOGENE BROWN, TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS A. AND IMOGENE BROWN TRUST DATED JULY 2, 1984 SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
More informationCHAPTER XXIII BOARD OF APPEALS SECTION MEMBERS, PER DIEM EXPENSES AND REMOVAL.
CHAPTER XXIII BOARD OF APPEALS SECTION 23.01 MEMBERS, PER DIEM EXPENSES AND REMOVAL. There is hereby continued and/or created a Zoning Board of Appeals of five (5) members. The first member of such Board
More informationPLANNING DEPARTMENT Application for a Variance through the Board of Adjustment & Appeals
PLANNING DEPARTMENT Application for a Variance through the Board of Adjustment & Appeals Dear Applicant: A variance is a request to lessen or remove certain dimensional standards of the Pinellas County
More informationCity of Forest Acres South Carolina Zoning Board of Appeals Application. Receipt Number:
City of Forest Acres South Carolina Zoning Board of Appeals Application Date Filed: Fee: Request Number: Receipt Number: A variance is a request to deviate from current zoning requirements. If granted,
More informationCALVERT COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS ORDER
CALVERT COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS ORDER Case No. 14-3817 Public Hearing: May 1, 2014 Telecom Capital Group, LLC has applied on behalf of the property owners David & Robin Harris for a Special Exception to
More informationGEORGE DAVID FULLER AND DAWN LOUSIE FULLER
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0208-V GEORGE DAVID FULLER AND DAWN LOUSIE FULLER THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: NOVEMBER 3, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS MEETINGS: 2nd Thursday of each month at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers, First Floor of City Hall. DUE DATE FOR SUBMITTALS: 2 weeks
More informationEDGEWATER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. BOA
EDGEWATER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. BOA 2015 02 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE MAXIMUM REAR YARD FENCE HEIGHT OF SIX FEET (6 ), IMPOSED BY EDGEWATER
More informationCity of Aurora PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES June 21, 2017
City of Aurora PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES June 21, 2017 The Aurora Planning Commission met in a regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, June 21, 2017, in Council Chambers of Aurora City Hall.
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT DECISION ON MOTION. LeGrand & Scata Variance Application
SUPERIOR COURT Vermont Unit STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 110-8-14 Vtec LeGrand & Scata Variance Application DECISION ON MOTION Decision on Motion for Summary Judgment This matter
More informationDevelopment Review Templates for Savings Clause Compliance 24 V.S.A Chapter , 4462 and 4464 May, 2005
Development Review Templates for Savings Clause Compliance 24 V.S.A Chapter 117 4461, 4462 and 4464 May, 2005 Table of Contents A. HEARING NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Page 2 1. Templates
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS The Board of Zoning and Building Appeals meetings are held on the 2nd Thursday of each month at 7:00 P.M. Submittals must
More informationCITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY Attachments for Acres X Ordinance. Approved by.
Department Planning Subject Z1407 Rezoning Located at the NW Corner of Boston Ave CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY 19 2014 Attachments for 48 63 Acres X Ordinance X Staff Report
More informationBoard of Adjustment. November 19, 2013 immediately following the Planning Board meeting at 7:00pm Council Chambers, 201 S Main St.
Board of Adjustment Meeting Agenda November 19, 2013 immediately following the Planning Board meeting at 7:00pm Council Chambers, 201 S Main St Invocation 1. Approve minutes of the February 19, 2013 meeting
More informationA. The Board of Adjustment members and appointment procedure.
ARTICLE 27, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Section 1, Members and General Provisions. A. The Board of Adjustment members and appointment procedure. 1. The Board of Adjustment shall consist of five residents of the
More informationStaff Report TO: FROM: RE: Chesapeake Board of Zoning Appeals Dale Ware, AICP, CZA Application # ZON-BZA-2017-00022 1430 Oleander Avenue Hearing Date: September 28, 2017 Application # ZON-BZA-2017-00022
More informationThe applicant is proposing the following modifications of the North Park Isles Community Unit district:
0)L4N7 443. rrekg AGENDA REPORT FLORIv t* DATE: April 11, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Commission Michael Herr, City Manager A resolution setting a public hearing on an ordinance modifying the North Park
More informationArgued September 12, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Yannotti, Carroll, and Mawla.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More information320 Conn. 9 Supreme Court of Connecticut. E AND F ASSOCIATES, LLC v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the TOWN OF FAIRFIELD et al. No
320 Conn. 9 Supreme Court of Connecticut. E AND F ASSOCIATES, LLC v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the TOWN OF FAIRFIELD et al. No. 19325. Argued Oct. 5, 2015. Decided Dec. 22, 2015. Synopsis Background:
More informationUPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD P.O. BOX 2187 UPPER CHICHESTER, PA (610)
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD P.O. BOX 2187 UPPER CHICHESTER, PA 19061 (610) 485-5719 INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS A. General Instructions Applicants who have a request to make of the Zoning
More informationCITY OF MENTOR APPLICATION FOR APPEAL Board of Building and Zoning Appeals
VAR- - - CITY OF MENTOR APPLICATION FOR APPEAL Board of Building and Zoning Appeals 1) Address: 2) Zoning Classification 3) Parcel Number: 4) Name and Address of Applicant: (Please Print) Name of Applicant
More informationTOWN OF ST. GERMAIN P. O. BOX 7 ST. GERMAIN, WI 54558
TOWN OF ST. GERMAIN P. O. BOX 7 ST. GERMAIN, WI 54558 www.townofstgermain.org Minutes, Zoning Committee March 06, 2019 1. Call to order: Chairman Ritter called meeting to order at 5:30pm 2. Roll call,
More informationAdministrative Procedures
Chapter 24 Administrative Procedures 24.010- Site Plan and Architectural Review A. Purpose. The purpose of site plan and architectural approval is to secure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and to
More informationGANGES TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO. 23 VEHICLE STORAGE AND REPAIR ORDINANCE. Adopted: December 13, Effective: January 22, 2006 THE TOWNSHIP OF GANGES
GANGES TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO. 23 VEHICLE STORAGE AND REPAIR ORDINANCE Adopted: December 13, 2005 Effective: January 22, 2006 An Ordinance to secure the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the residents
More informationCity Attorney's Synopsis
Eff.: Immediate ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK EXTENDING AND AMENDING AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE WHICH TEMPORARILY PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN
More informationH. CURTISS MARTIN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN JUNE 6, 2013 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices H. CURTISS MARTIN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 121526 JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN JUNE 6, 2013 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
More informationTOWN OF BARNSTEAD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT P.O. BOX 11 CENTER BARNSTEAD, NH X 4
TOWN OF BARNSTEAD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT P.O. BOX 11 CENTER BARNSTEAD, NH 03225 603-269-2299 X 4 APPLICATION FOR APPEAL Administrative Decision Special Exception X Variance Equitable Waiver FOR OFFICIAL
More information209/213 South Seventh Street Substandard Lot Variance
209/213 South Seventh Street Substandard Lot Variance Background: Steven Schmidt owns both parcels, 209 & 213 South Seventh Street. Steven Schmidt is looking to move 209 South Seventh Street s property
More informationRESOLUTION 16- A RESOLUTION DETERMINING VARIANCE PETITION 16-V5 TO ALLOW FOR A WALL SIGN EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA PROVIDED IN SECTION
Agenda Item 13 Meeting of 06/15/16 RESOLUTION 16- A RESOLUTION DETERMINING VARIANCE PETITION 16-V5 TO ALLOW FOR A WALL SIGN EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA PROVIDED IN SECTION 50-35(c)(1), NEIGHBORHOOD
More informationVariance Information Sheet Pursuant to Skagit County Code Chapter Visit: for detailed information
Skagit County Planning & Development Services 1800 Continental Place Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Inspections (360) 336-9306 Office (360) 336-9410 Fax (360) 336-9416 Variance Information Sheet Pursuant to Skagit
More informationKENNETH RUEHL AND IDA RUEHL
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0217-R KENNETH RUEHL AND IDA RUEHL FOURTH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: DECEMBER 3, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
More informationCITY OF STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING CODE APPEALS Foltz Parkway, Strongsville, Ohio 44149
CITY OF STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING CODE APPEALS 16099 Foltz Parkway, Strongsville, Ohio 44149 INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICATION TO BOARD OF BUILDING CODE AND ZONING APPEALS This information is
More informationCITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT
CITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT February 2016 23200 Gratiot, Eastpointe, MI 48021 - Building Department -- 586-445-3661 A FENCE PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS IT MEETS
More informationJAMES A. COON LOCAL GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL SERIES. Guidelines for Applicants To the Zoning Board of Appeals
Guidelines for Applicants To the Zoning Board of Appeals This publication has been written to aid potential applicants in understanding and appreciating the appeals process, and to provide an explanation
More informationARTICLE XVI BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
ARTICLE XVI Section 1. Section 2. POWERS AND DUTIES FEES Section 3. Section 4. ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE Section 1. POWERS AND DUTIES The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have the
More informationBOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
ARTICLE 24 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 2400 APPOINTMENT, SERVICE The Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) shall consider a Variance, Exception, Conditional Use, or an Appeal request. The BZA shall consist of five
More informationCHARLOTTE CODE CHAPTER 5: APPEALS AND VARIANCES
CHAPTER 5: APPEALS AND VARIANCES Section 5.101. Authority of City of Charlotte. (1) The Board of Adjustment shall have the authority to hear and decide appeals from and to review any specific order, requirement,
More informationCITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE OH TELEPHONE: (513) FAX:
CITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT 11700 SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE OH 45246 TELEPHONE: (513) 346-5730 FAX: (513) 346-5747 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR VARIANCE REQUEST
More informationArticle V - Zoning Hearing Board
Section 500 POWERS AND DUTIES - GENERAL (also see Article IX of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code) '500.1 Membership of Board: The membership of the Board shall consist of five (5) residents
More informationArticle 18 Amendments and Zoning Procedures
18.1 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATIVE BODIES. The provisions of this Article of the Zoning Ordinance shall be administered by the Planning and Land Use Department, in association with and in support of the
More informationNo. 74, September Term, 1996 County Council Of Prince George s County, Maryland, Sitting As The District Council v. Brandywine Enterprises, Inc.
No. 74, September Term, 1996 County Council Of Prince George s County, Maryland, Sitting As The District Council v. Brandywine Enterprises, Inc. [Concerns The Legality, As Applied To An Application For
More informationWhy a Board of Adjustment? Its Role & Authority
Why a Board of Adjustment? Its Role & Authority By Rita F. Douglas-Talley Assistant Municipal Counselor The City of Oklahoma City Why a Board of Adjustment? The City of Oklahoma established its Board of
More informationORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 861 Attachment 1 AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS AND EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS IN FOUR DESIGNATED
More informationBorrok v Town of Southampton 2014 NY Slip Op 31412(U) May 19, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 08918/2014 Judge: Jerry Garguilo
Borrok v Town of Southampton 2014 NY Slip Op 31412(U) May 19, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 08918/2014 Judge: Jerry Garguilo Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NINE A, LLC TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD. Argued: April 30, 2008 Opinion Issued: June 3, 2008
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationARTICLE 23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS
Adopted 12-6-16 ARTICLE 23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS Sections: 23-1 Telecommunications Towers; Permits 23-2 Fencing and Screening 23-3 Setbacks and Landscaping 23-4 Security 23-5 Access 23-6 Maintenance
More informationCRYSTAL CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0167-V CRYSTAL CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC FOURTH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationArticle 14: Nonconformities
Section 14.01 Article 14: Nonconformities Purpose Within the districts established by this resolution, some lots, uses of lands or structures, or combinations thereof may exist which were lawful prior
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V ELLEN C. GRIFFIN SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JANUARY 5, 2016 ORDERED BY:
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0243-V ELLEN C. GRIFFIN SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JANUARY 5, 2016 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
More informationPROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT SUBMITTED TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. In the Matter of a Special Use Application. for Address: Board Calendar No.
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT SUBMITTED TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS In the Matter of a Special Use Application for Address: Board Calendar No. Submitted by:, [check one] Applicant or Applicant s Attorney
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0080-V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JUNE 18, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationMEMORANDUM. Proposed revisions to Town of Kiawah Island Board of Zoning Appeals Rules of Procedure
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Town of Kiawah Island BZA Members John Taylor, Jr., Planning Director DATE: December 10, 2018 SUBJECT: Monday, December 17, 2018 4:00 p.m. Kiawah Island BZA Meeting Packet Attached
More informationREGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dearborn, Michigan. December 7, 2015
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dearborn, Michigan December 7, 2015 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairperson Siwik. Upon roll call, the following members were present:
More informationChairperson Schafer; Vice-Chair Berndt; Members: Napier, Oen and Stearn
REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 12, 2004 PAGE 1 Present: Absent: Chairperson Schafer; Vice-Chair Berndt; Members: Napier, Oen and Stearn Brady, Fahlen, Needham and Verdi-Hus Also
More informationPLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LIVINGSTON PLANNING BOARD
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LIVINGSTON PLANNING BOARD 1. What is the Planning Board? The Planning Board is a nine-member body appointed by the Livingston Township Council. Six members are Livingston
More informationARTICLE 25 ZONING HEARING BOARD Contents
ARTICLE 25 ZONING HEARING BOARD Contents 2500 Establishment of Board 2501 Membership and Terms of Office 2502 Procedures 2503 Interpretation 2504 Variances 2505 Special Exceptions 2506 Challenge to the
More informationARTICLE IV ADMINISTRATION
Highlighted items in bold and underline font are proposed to be added. Highlighted items in strikethrough font are proposed to be removed. CHAPTER 4.01. GENERAL. Section 4.01.01. Permits Required. ARTICLE
More information2 May 14, 2014 Public Hearing
2 May 14, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC. STAFF PLANNER: Kevin Kemp REQUEST: Modification of a Conditional Use Permit for Motor Vehicle Sales approved by the
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET
A REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL OF THE INTERPETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR A VARIANCE REQUESTING AN EXCEPTION FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE. SUBMITTED BY: DATE: RECEIVED BY: REQUIRED MATERIALS: COMPLETED APPLICATION
More informationARTICLE XX ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT
ARTICLE XX ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT SECTION 2000. ENFORCEMENT: The provisions of this Ordinance shall be administered and enforced by the Building Inspector, or by such deputies of his department
More informationo for a variance as stated on attached Form 3
Florence County Planning Department 518 S. Irby Street, Florence, S.C. 29501 Office (843)676-8600 Toll-free (866)258-9232 Fax (843)676-8667 Toll-free (866)259-2068 Florence County Board of Zoning Appeals
More informationShelley s Fields DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Shelley s Fields DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) made this day of, 2007 by and among, SHELLEY MIDDLETOWN ROAD HOLDINGS, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (referred
More informationKNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION PLAN AMENDMENT REPORT
KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION PLAN AMENDMENT REPORT FILE #: 10-A-18-SP AGENDA ITEM #: 38 APPLICANT: OWNER(S): LECONTE HOLDINGS LeConte Holdings, LLC AGENDA DATE: 10/11/2018 TAX
More informationBoard of Zoning Appeals: In Depth & Up Close
Board of Zoning Appeals: In Depth & Up Close 2010 Land Use Update -- Purdue Video Series K.K. Gerhart-Fritz, AICP The Planning Workshop, Inc. March 1, 2010 Disclaimers See IC 36-7-4-918.6 for counties
More informationPresent: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons and Agee, JJ., and Russell, S.J.
Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons and Agee, JJ., and Russell, S.J. DONALD H. COCHRAN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 030982 SENIOR JUSTICE CHARLES S. RUSSELL April 23, 2004 FAIRFAX
More informationBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Meeting Date: Application Deadline: Application Fee: See attached schedule for dates. Meeting begins promptly at 5:30 p.m. in the 2 nd Floor Conference Room, City Hall,
More informationAct upon building, construction and use applications which are under the jurisdiction of the Code Enforcement Officer.
SECTION 2 2.1 Code Enforcement Officer 2.1.1 Unless otherwise provided in this Ordinance, the Code Enforcement Officer (CEO), as duly appointed by the City Manager and confirmed by the Gardiner City Council,
More informationCC/Cash/Check No.: Amount Recd. $ Receipt No.: Case No.: Submittal date office use only
Planning & Community Development Department Planning Division 550 Landa St. New Braunfels, TX 78130 (830) 221-4050 www.nbtexas.org CC/Cash/Check No.: Amount Recd. $ Receipt No.: Case No.: VARIANCE APPLICATION
More informationARTICLE 9. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
ARTICLE 9. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 9.1. Summary of Authority The following table summarizes review and approval authority under this UDO. Technical Committee Director Historic Committee Board of Adjustment
More informationARTICLE 4. LEGISLATIVE/QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
ARTICLE 4. LEGISLATIVE/QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEDURES PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS.......................................................... 4-2 Section 4.1 Requests to be Heard Expeditiously........................................
More informationCity of Monona 5211 Schluter Road Monona, WI Phone: (608) Fax: (608)
City of Monona 5211 Schluter Road Monona, WI 53716 Phone: (608) 222-2525 Fax: (608) 222-9225 www.mymonona.com TO: FROM: Applicant for Zoning Variance Office of City of Monona Zoning Administrator This
More informationCITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING April 16, Mr. Paino called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Paino Geneva Hintz Diane Werner ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Steve Balazs Rich Fender Jim Silver, Law Director Heather
More informationBoard of Zoning Appeals Training. Hardships
S.C. Code 6-29-800 State Law that governs conduct of the BZA Three powers of BZA Hear appeals from a decision of the zoning administrator Grant (or deny) variances Grant (or deny) Special Exceptions SC
More informationBOROUGH OF INTERLAKEN MINUTES- PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 22, :30 P.M. BOROUGH HALL, 100 GRASSMERE AVENUE
BOROUGH OF INTERLAKEN MINUTES- PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 22, 2018 7:30 P.M. BOROUGH HALL, 100 GRASSMERE AVENUE A meeting of the PLANNING BOARD of the Borough of Interlaken, Monmouth County, New Jersey was
More informationCITY OF WARRENVILLE DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE APPROVING PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (JUSTIN MASON 29W602 BUTTERFIELD ROAD)
CITY OF WARRENVILLE DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2961 ORDINANCE APPROVING PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (JUSTIN MASON 29W602 BUTTERFIELD ROAD) WHEREAS, Justin R. Mason (the Owner ) of property commonly
More informationDepartment of Planning and Development
VILLAGE OF SOMERS Department of Planning and Development VARIANCE APPLICATION Owner: Mailing Address: Phone Number(s): To the Village of Somers Board of Appeals: Please take notice that the undersigned
More informationVariance Application And Notice of Appeal To The Board of Adjustment
MUST BE FILED IN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY 9:00am ON HEARING DATE:10:00am Variance Application And Notice of Appeal To The Board of Adjustment Part 1. General Information 1. Application Form. Be sure to thoroughly
More informationORDINANCE NO
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.6 ORDINANCE NO. 23-2016 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK GROVE ADOPTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER, LP WHEREAS, on
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff/Appellant : CASE NO CVF 01712
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO S-THREE, LLC, : Plaintiff/Appellant : CASE NO. 2013 CVF 01712 vs. : Judge McBride BATAVIA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : ZONING APPEALS : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant/Appellee
More informationSection 9.12: Cell Tower Regulations
A. Definitions Specific To This Section: (1) Cellular Antenna: Any structure or device used to collect or radiate electromagnetic waves, including both directional antennas, such as panels, microwave dishes
More information