THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE
|
|
- Noel Riley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE A DVANCING J USTICE T HROUGH J UDICIAL E DUCATION PROTECTED INTERESTS DIVIDER 3 Honorable Joseph M. Troy OBJECTIVES: After this session you will be able to: 1. Summarize the three interests protected by the Fourth Amendment; 2. Identify privacy and reduced expectations of privacy as the principal protections of the Fourth Amendment; and 3. Describe limitations on protected interests including open fields, assumption of risk, voluntary disclosure and abandoned property. REQUIRED READING: PAGE Joseph M. Troy, Interests Protected by the Fourth Amendment (Dec. 2010) [NCJRL PowerPoint]...1 EX: FOURTH AMENDMENT TRAINING FOR NM MAGISTRATES WB/KZ DECEMBER 6-9, 2010 ALBUQUERQUE, NM
2 Interests Protected by the Fourth Amendment National Center for Justice and the Rule of Law Presented By Joe Troy Textual Basis for Protected Interest Fourth Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated Fourth Amendment Applicability A. Is there government activity? (i.e. did police search or seize?) B. Did that activity intrude upon a protected interest? C. Does the defendant have a protected interest in object searched or seized? 1
3 Does the Fourth Amendment Apply to Police Search or Seizure of: Prison cells Trash on curb Contraband Records of your financial affairs in possession of bank Privately owned real property Illegal aliens or escaped prisoner Protected Interests 1. Personal Liberty The right to be free from government control Government Activity: Seizure of Person Arrest or Temporary Detention 2. Possession of papers and effects Government activity: seizure meaningful interference with an individual's possessory interests to property Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56 (1992) 2
4 3. Privacy: Security of person, houses Government activity search or seizure Fourth Amendment Analysis 1. Does the 4th Apply? A. Gov't activity: Search or Seizure B. Protected interest in object searched or seized: liberty, possession, privacy C. Standing of defendant 2. Are 4 th Amd. Requirements Satisfied? A. Is Warrantless search Reasonable (only unreasonable searches prohibited) B. Warrant Clause requirements satisfied 3. Remedies for Violation? Open Fields/Curtilage: Application of Fourth Amendment On Private Property 3
5 Hester, 265 U.S. 57 (1924) On a tip, revenue officers investigated Hester and others for violating liquor laws. U.S. revenue officers hid behind trees on Hester s property on a tip that he was operating a still. After Hester exited his house and handed a 5 gallon jug to another, officers pursued and arrested Hester. Open Fields Doctrine [T]he special protection accorded by the 4 th A. to the people in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, is not extended to the open fields. The distinction between the latter and the house is as old as the common law. Oliver v. U.S., 466 U.S. 170 (1984) Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes U.S. v Katz, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) FBI attached listening device and recorder to outside of phone booth Katz used to call in bets 4
6 U.S. v Katz (1967) Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. 389 U.S. at 351. there is a twofold requirement, [1] an actual expectation of privacy and [2] one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. Id. at 361 (emphasis added). Oliver v. U.S., 466 U.S. 170 (1984) The Open Fields Doctrine in the Modern Era Oliver v U.S. Anonymous tip to KY State Police that Oliver had pot plants growing on his farm Officers had no: probable cause, warrant, exigency Drove onto farm property past trailer (residence) Walked around fence w/no trespassing signs Ignored statement by someone in trailer: Hey no hunting, get out Found plants growing in fields surrounded by other crops 5
7 Open field need be neither open nor a field as those terms are used in common speech. For example... a thickly wooded area nonetheless may be an open field U.S. at 180. [F]or most homes, the boundaries of the curtilage will be clearly marked; as the area around the home to which the activity of home life extends easily understood from our daily experience. Id. at 182, n. 12. It is clear that the term open fields may include any unoccupied or undeveloped area outside of the curtilage. Id. at 180, n. 11. Curtilage [T]he area to which extends the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man s home and the privacies of life. Oliver v. U.S., 466 U.S. 170, 180 (citation omitted). Curtilage: Area for Regular Activities of Family 6
8 Open fields doctrine in Hester consistent with the right to privacy doctrine of Katz. No societal interest in protecting the privacy of activities that generally take place in fields. Trespass laws have little or no relevance to applicability of the Fourth Amendment. U.S. v Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987) 200 acres encircled by rail fence Ranch enclosed by another fence 7
9 Additional interior barbed wire fences Barn had wooden fence and waist-high gates Four Factors for Curtilage 1. Proximity of area to home 2. Whether area is included within enclosure surrounding home 3. Nature of uses to which area is put 4. Steps taken by resident to protect area from observation by passersby We do not suggest that combining these factors produces a finely tuned formula that, when mechanically applied, yields a correct answer to all curtilage questions. these factors are useful analytical tools only to the degree that they bear upon the centrally relevant consideration - whether the area in question is so intimately tied to the home itself that it should be placed under the home's umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection. Applying these factors to respondent's barn and to the area immediately surrounding it, we have little difficulty in concluding that this area lay outside the curtilage of the ranch house. 8
10 Curtilage Determinations May Depend on Geographic or Cultural Differences Gated Communities? 9
11 State v. Sutton, 112 N.M. 449 (Ct. App. 1991) Open Fields or Curtilage? Sutton grew marijuana in a field approximately yards from his cabin. 10
12 In New Mexico, lot sizes in rural areas are often large, and land is still plentiful. 112 N.M. at 524. Our interpretation of the state constitution must take into account the possibility that such differences in custom and terrain gave rise to particular expectations of privacy when the state constitution was adopted. Id. The growing of crops does not make an area occupied or developed under the open fields exception; no warrant necessary. Id. at 521. State v. Moore 144 N.M. 183 (Ct. App. 2008) An Estancia, New Mexico officer in yard with permission, smells the odor of ammonia. He knew it s used to make meth and traced the odor to Defendant s garage. As he was looking through a crack in the garage g door, ammonia vapors burned his eyes and lungs. Defendants detained outside. Officers searched the garage. This was a good search because exigent circumstances existed. Mobile home was 30 away. Officers, then searched the mobile home. New Mexico Ct. of Appeals: There must be specific reasons to enter curtilage or a residence. Defendant and his brother were detained in the area while officers did the search. Officers had time to get warrant without risking destruction of evidence Home and curtilage requires warrant where no exigent circumstances existed to enter. Evidence suppressed. 11
13 Fly-Over Cases California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986) Ciraolo lived in home with 6 wall around property and 10 wall extending around patio On tip that he was growing pot in backyard, police attempt to view Ciraolo s property Unable to see over walls, officers leased a plane Flew over the next day at 1000 observe and took 45mm photos of 73 welltended plants 12
14 C.J. Burger: The Fourth Amendment simply does not require the police traveling in public airways to obtain a warrant to observe what is visible to the naked eye. Id. at 208. J.Powell, dissent Majority failed to apply Katz test: Whether the surveillance in question had invaded a constitutionally protected reasonable expectation of privacy. Id. at 219. Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989) Helicopter surveillance at 400 Close enough to see marijuana through missing panels 13
15 Florida v Riley (1989) J. White, majority: [A]ny member of the public could legally have observed respondent s greenhouse from that altitude. 488 U.S. at 446. J. O Connor, concurrence: FAA regulations are for air safety, not for purpose of Fourth Amendment analysis: It s not legality of flight, it s whether it s unreasonable for person to expect to be observed from air at that altitude. Id. Inspection / Search of Commercial Property Traditionally, commercial property, closed to public access, is generally protected under the Fourth Amendment concerning criminal investigations by the government. Common Law Protection People commonly worked from home Shops, farms, blacksmith, doctor, lawyer 14
16 Regulatory Inspections The Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches applies to administrative inspections of private commercial property. However, unlike searches of private homes, legislative schemes authorizing warrantless administrative searches of commercial property do not necessarily violate the Fourth Amendment. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc., 436 U.S. 307 (1978); See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967). Donovan v Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981) the expectation of privacy that the owner of commercial property enjoys in such property differs significantly from the sanctity accorded an individual's home. Id. at [T]his privacy interest may, in certain circumstances, be adequately protected by regulatory schemes authorizing warrantless inspections. Id. Dow Chemical v U.S., 476 U.S. 227 (1986) Dow Chemical Complex 15
17 Dow took extensive security measures to protect complex from public view. EPA investigating air emissions EPA conducted fly-over and used sophisticated cameras to capture views that can not be seen by naked eye Dow obtained injunction against further surveillance as 4 th A. violation. Burger: Open areas of this complex not analogous to curtilage of home. Cautions against more sophisticated satellite imagery or building penetrating surveillance. [P]hysical entry into any enclosed area would raise significantly different questions. 476 U.S. at 237. Structure of 4th Amendment Analysis 1. Does the 4th Apply? A. Gov't activity: Search or Seizure B. Protected interest in object searched or seized: Liberty, possession, privacy C. Standing of defendant 2. Are 4 th Amd. Requirements Satisfied? A. Is Warrantless search Reasonable (only unreasonable searches prohibited) B. Warrant Clause requirements satisfied 3. Remedies for Violation? 16
Interests Protected by the Fourth Amendment
Interests Protected by the Fourth Amendment National Center for Justice and the Rule of Law The University of Mississippi School of Law Presented By Joe Troy Textual Basis for Protected Interest Fourth
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PATRICIA SMITH. Argued: October 20, 2011 Opinion Issued: January 13, 2012
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationIn Plane View: Is Aerial Surveillance a Violation of the Fourth Amendment - California v. Ciraolo
SMU Law Review Volume 40 1986 In Plane View: Is Aerial Surveillance a Violation of the Fourth Amendment - California v. Ciraolo Saundra R. Steinberg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr
More information,Suptrtut Court of 71ReuEllik_ SC DG OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE KELLER REVERSING
RENDERED: FEBRUARY 18, 2016,Suptrtut Court of 71ReuEllik_11 2014-SC-0005.11-DG DAT E3 -to COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLANT S.J...k-Gc040,44.7*X- ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. CASE NO. 2012-CA-002188-MR
More informationA MAN S BARN IS NOT HIS CASTLE: WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF STRUCTURES UNDER THE OPEN FIELDS DOCTRINE
A MAN S BARN IS NOT HIS CASTLE: WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF STRUCTURES UNDER THE OPEN FIELDS DOCTRINE Rowan Themer * I. INTRODUCTION For over two hundred years, the United States Constitution has protected
More information"The Conundrum of the Curtilage: A Critical Interpretation of Florida v. Jardines"
Brigham Young University Prelaw Review Volume 29 Article 11 4-1-2015 "The Conundrum of the Curtilage: A Critical Interpretation of Florida v. Jardines" Justin Shaw T. Mark Frost Michael Stevens Follow
More informationIN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. ---o0o--
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I ---o0o-- STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BENJAMIN M. QUIDAY, Defendant-Appellant NO. CAAP-13-0004085 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationThe Post-Katz Problem of When "Looking" Will Constitute Searching Violative of the Fourth Amendment
Louisiana Law Review Volume 38 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1976-1977 Term: A Symposium Winter 1978 The Post-Katz Problem of When "Looking" Will Constitute Searching Violative
More informationREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1998 DONNA L. SAMPSON STATE OF MARYLAND
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1892 September Term, 1998 DONNA L. SAMPSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND Murphy, C.J., Hollander, Salmon, JJ. Opinion by Murphy, C.J. Filed: January 19,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JONATHAN OSORIO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-0654 [May 9, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 24, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D10-3264 Lower Tribunal No. 06-1071 K Omar Ricardo
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cr-00-efs Document Filed /0/ 0 ROBERT M. SEINES (WSBA No. 0) Attorney at Law P.O. Box Liberty Lake, WA 0 Phone: 0-- Fax: 0--00 Email: rseines@msn.com Hanni M. Fakhoury (admitted pro hac vice) Jennifer
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT DAVID ANDREW BAINTER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v. Case
More informationFalse Security: Kyllo and Thermal Imaging of the Non-Residential Structure by Christopher Desmond
False Security: Kyllo and Thermal Imaging of the Non-Residential Structure by Christopher Desmond Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the King Scholar Program Michigan State University
More informationFACT SHEET. Farmers are challenged daily by. When Can the Government Enter Your Farm? FEB 2015
FACT SHEET FEB 2015 When Can the Government Enter Your Farm? Farmers are challenged daily by a variety of external factors: fluctuating markets, the unpredictability of Mother Nature, and perhaps the most
More informationUNITED STATES v. DUNN 480 U.S. 294 (1987)
480 U.S. 294 (1987) Defendant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas of conspiracy to manufacture controlled substances and related offenses. The Court of Appeals
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-2107 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. William
More informationPolice Trespass and the Fourth Amendment: A Wall in Need of Mending
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions 1989 Police Trespass and the Fourth Amendment: A Wall in Need of Mending
More informationCalifornia v. Greenwood: Police Access to Valuable Garbage
Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 39 Issue 3 1989 California v. Greenwood: Police Access to Valuable Garbage Richard A. Di Lisi Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev
More informationSURVEY OF TRENDS IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE LAW
SURVEY OF TRENDS IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE LAW Emil A. Tonkovich* This article surveys significant trends in search and seizure law. Recent United States Supreme Court decisions are reviewed. The 1 scope of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr SPM-AK-1.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM DIAZ, a.k.a. Eduardo Morales Rodriguez, FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12722 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket
More informationSearch Warrant Exceptions. Coach Presnell
Search Warrant Exceptions Coach Presnell Agenda Objective Arguments For Warrantless Search Lecture Actual Exceptions Web-Ex for Exceptions Objective Students will be able to apply to the exceptions to
More informationSearch & Seizure: Historical Analysis of the Fourth Amendment
Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 12-18-2015 Search & Seizure: Historical Analysis of the Fourth
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: January 14, 2014 Docket No. 28,219 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, NORMAN DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. William F. Stone, Judge. October 31, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-0941 DARWIN DWAYNE DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. William F. Stone, Judge.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUAN PINEDA-MORENO, No. 08-30385 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:07-CR-30036-PA Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
More informationWarrantless Search Problems and Answers
Warrantless Search Problems and Answers Jeff Welty 1. Two homicide detectives employed by the police department of a town built around a mountain lake want to conduct a knock and talk at a murder suspect
More informationCalifornia v. Ciraolo: The Demise of Private Property
Louisiana Law Review Volume 47 Number 6 July 1987 California v. Ciraolo: The Demise of Private Property Rosemarie Falcone Repository Citation Rosemarie Falcone, California v. Ciraolo: The Demise of Private
More informationReturn to Open Season for Police in the Open Field, The
Missouri Law Review Volume 50 Issue 2 Spring 1985 Article 6 Spring 1985 Return to Open Season for Police in the Open Field, The Gregory K. Laughlin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr
More informationDomestic Drones CAUSE FOR CONCERN?
October 12, 2015 Domestic Drones CAUSE FOR CONCERN? AN ACLU OF MISSISSIPPI WHITE PAPER BLAKE FELDMAN, ADVOCACY COORDINATOR I. Introduction Few privacy issues have generated a more visceral reaction than
More informationWe apply the open fields doctrine in a case involving an aerial observation of a corn field.
State v. Marolda, N.J. Super. (App. Div. 2007). The following summary is not part of the opinion of the court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of the opinion may not have been summarized.
More informationLET THIS JARDINES GROW: THE CASE FOR CURTILAGE PROTECTION IN COMMON SPACES
NOTE LET THIS JARDINES GROW: THE CASE FOR CURTILAGE PROTECTION IN COMMON SPACES KATHRYN E. FIFIELD* It is axiomatic that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects Americans from unwarranted
More informationWarrantless Satellite Surveillance: Will our 4th Amendment Privacy Rights be Lost in Space?, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L.
The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law Volume 13 Issue 4 Journal of Computer & Information Law - Summer 1995 Article 12 Summer 1995 Warrantless Satellite Surveillance: Will our
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. August Term, Argued: October 30, 2017 Decided: May 1, No cr
16-3708-cr United States v. Alexander UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2017 Argued: October 30, 2017 Decided: May 1, 2018 No. 16-3708-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Appellee,
More informationCOMMONWEALTH vs. LUIS SANCHEZ. No. 14-P Bristol. February 5, March 23, Present: Green, Hanlon, & Henry, JJ.
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal
More informationTHE ABANDONMENT DOCTRINE AND UNITED STATES V. SPARKS I. INTRODUCTION
THE ABANDONMENT DOCTRINE AND UNITED STATES V. SPARKS I. INTRODUCTION Many of us 1 have experienced that sinking feeling before: the moment you realize that your cell phone is missing. First, it is the
More informationIn the Court of Appeals Fifteenth District of Texas at Arlington. No CV. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellant. DIXIE HERBSTER Appellee
In the Court of Appeals Fifteenth District of Texas at Arlington No. 15-16-00034-CV THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellant V. DIXIE HERBSTER Appellee On Appeal from the 202 nd District Court Linchfield County, Texas
More informationCODE OFFICIAL LIABILITY
LEGAL DISCLAIMER The following presentation includes general principles of law regarding building and safety code administration and enforcement. It is not intended to be used as legal advice, nor is it
More information2:08-cv PDB-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 04/14/10 Pg 1 of 17 Pg ID 279 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:08-cv-14608-PDB-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 04/14/10 Pg 1 of 17 Pg ID 279 MAURICE BOLLINI and LISA BOLLINI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiffs, Case No. 08-14608
More informationSupreme Court of Louisiana
Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 3 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 21st day of January, 2009, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2008-KK-1002
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2001 CHRISTOPHER HARRIS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D00-2505 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed August 10, 2001 Appeal
More informationCriminal Procedure Update: Drones, Dogs and Delay TOPICS. Recent Supreme Court Cases. Professor Laurie L. Levenson Loyola Law School (2016)
Criminal Procedure Update: Drones, Dogs and Delay Professor Laurie L. Levenson Loyola Law School (2016) TOPICS Investigative Drones Dogs Cell Tower Data Apple v. FBI Eyewitness IDs Adjudicative Speedy
More informationTHE MARCH OF SCIENCE: FOURTH AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS ON REMOTE SENSING IN CRIMINAL LAW
THE MARCH OF SCIENCE: FOURTH AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS ON REMOTE SENSING IN CRIMINAL LAW Surya Gablin Gunasekara* The government s use of technology must be weighed in the Fourth Amendment balance not because
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Certiorari Denied, January 6, 2010, No. 32,089 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2010-NMCA-020 Filing Date: November 18, 2009 Docket No. 28,276 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v.
More informationChapter 10 WHERE THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE DOES NOT APPLY
Chapter 10 WHERE THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE DOES NOT APPLY 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Learning Objectives Define standing for Fourth Amendment purposes. Explain the role of consent in searches
More informationGENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SEARCH AND SEIZURE NUMBER: 1.7.2 ISSUED: 5/5/09 SCOPE: All Sworn Police Personnel EFFECTIVE: 5/5/09 DISTRIBUTION: General Orders Manual RESCINDS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 98 223 FLORIDA, PETITIONER v. TYVESSEL TYVORUS WHITE ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA [May 17, 1999] JUSTICE STEVENS,
More informationCOVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
COVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Subject: SEARCH AND SEIZURE Date of Issue: 01-01-1999 Number of Pages: 6 Policy No. P220 Review Date: 06-01-2007 Distribution: Departmental Revision
More information1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: October 19, 2015 4 NO. S-1-SC-34548 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Plaintiff-Petitioner, 7 v. 8 NORMAN DAVIS, 9 Defendant-Respondent.
More informationTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND
10 THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW AND THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE SEARCHES WITHOUT WARRANTS DIVIDER 10 Honorable Mark J. McGinnis OBJECTIVES: After this session, you will be able
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 16-3766 NAPERVILLE SMART METER AWARENESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NAPERVILLE, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 12 CF 000000 JOHN DOE, Defendant. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE THE DEFENDANT, John Doe,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED April 5, 2016 v No. 322625 Macomb Circuit Court PAUL ROBERT HARTIGAN, LC No. 2013-000669-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationUnited States v. Jones: The Foolish revival of the "Trespass Doctrine" in Addressing GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment
Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 47 Number 2 pp.277-288 Winter 2013 United States v. Jones: The Foolish revival of the "Trespass Doctrine" in Addressing GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment Brittany
More informationWarrantless Searches. Objectives. Two Types of Warrantless Searches. Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns
Warrantless Searches Jeff Welty UNC School of Government welty@sog.unc.edu (919) 843-8474 Objectives Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns Two Types of Warrantless Searches
More informationI. Introduction. fact that most people carry a cell phone, there has been relatively little litigation deciding
CELL PHONE SEARCHES IN SCHOOLS: THE NEW FRONTIER ANDREA KLIKA I. Introduction In the age of smart phones, what once was a simple device to make phone calls has become a personal computer that stores a
More information2017 PA Super 182 OPINION BY MOULTON, J.: FILED JUNE 12, The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the May 9, 2016
2017 PA Super 182 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NAVARRO BANKS No. 922 MDA 2016 Appeal from the Order Entered May 9, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of
More informationNo D.C. No. CR HJF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANNY LEE KYLLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-30333 D.C. No. CR-92-00051-1-HJF OPINION Appeal from the
More informationLocation Privacy: The Legal Landscape. David L. Sobel Senior Counsel, EFF Stanford PNT Symposium October 29, 2014
Location Privacy: The Legal Landscape David L. Sobel Senior Counsel, EFF Stanford PNT Symposium October 29, 2014 Overview Increasing public concern about location tracking Tracking by both government actors
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 529 U. S. (2000) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationSpies in the Skies: Dirtboxes and Airplane Electronic Surveillance
Michigan Law Review First Impressions Volume 113 2015 Spies in the Skies: Dirtboxes and Airplane Electronic Surveillance Brian L. Owsley Indiana Tech Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_fi
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION November 6, 2014 9:00 a.m. v No. 310416 Kent Circuit Court MAXIMILIAN PAUL GINGRICH, LC No. 11-007145-FH
More informationThe GPS Tracking Case Fourth Amendment United States Constitution
Fourth Amendment United States Constitution The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN: CIRCUIT COURT: RACINE COUNTY: Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
STATE OF WISCONSIN: CIRCUIT COURT: RACINE COUNTY: STATE OF WISCONSIN, v. DAMIEN BELL, Plaintiff, Case No. 2007CF000744 Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE NOW COMES the above-named defendant,
More informationWhat Were They Smoking: The Supreme Court's Latest Step in a Long, Strange Trip through the Fourth Amendment
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 93 Issue 1 Fall Article 5 Fall 2002 What Were They Smoking: The Supreme Court's Latest Step in a Long, Strange Trip through the Fourth Amendment Daniel McKenzie
More informationMEMORANDUM FOR BASIC LEGAL RESEARCH & WRITING I. QUESTIONS PRESENTED. A. Will Mr. Smeek prevail on a motion to suppress the 300 grams of hail seized
MEMORANDUM FOR BASIC LEGAL RESEARCH & WRITING TO: MR. CONGIARDO FROM: AMANDA SCOTT SUBJECT: RE: PEOPLE V. JOSHUA SMEEK DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2015 I. QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Will Mr. Smeek prevail on a motion
More informationPrivacy and the Fourth Amendment: Basics of Criminal Procedural Analysis for Government Searches and Seizures
AP-LS Student Committee Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: Basics of Criminal Procedural Analysis for Government Searches and www.apls-students.org Emma Marshall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Katherine
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 29,423. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY Daniel Viramontes, District Judge
0 0 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule -0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that
More informationThe Fourth Amendment places certain restrictions on when and how searches and seizures
Handout 1.4: Search Me in Public General Fourth Amendment Information The Fourth Amendment places certain restrictions on when and how searches and seizures can be conducted. The Fourth Amendment only
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 5, 2008 101104 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v OPINION AND ORDER SCOTT C. WEAVER,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Morgan, 2014-Ohio-1900.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. John W. Wise,
More informationPOCOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SUBJECT SEARCH AND SEIZURE NUMBER: 8.000 EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/24/2015 SCHEDULED REVIEW DATE: DATE REVIEWED: APPROVED BY: 06/14/2016 ISSUE DATE: 12/14/2015 REVISION DATE: Chief Steve
More informationIN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO.: MM10A. vs. JUDGE: ZACK
IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO.: 04-022805MM10A vs. JUDGE: ZACK ALLEN ADILI, Defendant / RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT S WRITTEN ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANT S MOTION
More information662 NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW [VOL. 92:661
THE DOG DAYS SHOULD BE OVER: THE INEQUALITY BETWEEN THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF APARTMENT DWELLERS AND THOSE OF HOMEOWNERS WITH RESPECT TO DRUG DETECTION DOGS ABSTRACT Recent judicial opinions throughout the
More informationEmerging Technology and the Fourth Amendment
Saber and Scroll Volume 1 Issue 1 Spring 2012 (Edited and Revised April 2015) Article 10 March 2012 Emerging Technology and the Fourth Amendment Kathleen Mitchell Reitmayer American Public University System
More informationSTATE V. GANT: DEPARTING FROM THE BRIGHT-LINE BELTON RULE IN AUTOMOBILE SEARCHES INCIDENT TO ARREST
STATE V. GANT: DEPARTING FROM THE BRIGHT-LINE BELTON RULE IN AUTOMOBILE SEARCHES INCIDENT TO ARREST Holly Wells INTRODUCTION In State v. Gant, 1 the Arizona Supreme Court, in a 3 to 2 decision, held that
More informationState v. Tate: Role of the Courts, Criminal Trials, and the Fourth Amendment (Grades 8 and 9)
State v. Tate: Role of the Courts, Criminal Trials, and the Fourth Amendment (Grades 8 and 9) Overall Learning Target In a world of social media and changing technology, what is the role of the court in
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States of America, v. Antoine Jones, Case: 08-3034 Document: 1278562 Filed: 11/19/2010 Page: 1 Appellee Appellant ------------------------------ Consolidated with 08-3030 1:05-cr-00386-ESH-1 Filed
More informationSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. BLAKE J. REED, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 6 March 2007
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. BLAKE J. REED, Defendant NO. COA06-400 Filed: 6 March 2007 Search and Seizure cigarette butt thrown down on patio within curtilage reasonable expectation of privacy The trial
More informationSupreme Court Rules On GPS Trackers: Is It 1984 Yet? Legal Question of the Week Vol. 5, Number 2 January 27, 2012
Supreme Court Rules On GPS Trackers: Is It 1984 Yet? Legal Question of the Week Vol. 5, Number 2 January 27, 2012 Brian Beasley Guy With Two Big Brothers and Legal Adviser, HPPD It was 1949 when George
More informationISSUE Did sheriff s detectives have sufficient reason to enter the defendants property under the so-called community caretaking rule?
People v. Morton (January 7, 2004) 114 Cal.App.4 th 1039 ISSUE Did sheriff s detectives have sufficient reason to enter the defendants property under the so-called community caretaking rule? FACTS Sonoma
More informationEl1l. 0 3!s;t. JUL 0 3 ton8 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COUR10F OHIO CLERK OF COURT SUPREME CUURT OF OHIO COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE, KEVIN PETERSON
Case No. 2007-2232 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellant, Vs. KEVIN PETERSON Defendant-Appellee ON APPEAL FROM THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
More information2018 PA Super 183 : : : : : : : : :
2018 PA Super 183 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. TAREEK ALQUAN HEMINGWAY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 684 WDA 2017 Appeal from the Order March 31, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas
More informationWarrantless Investigative Seizures of Real and Tangible Personal Property by Law Enforcement Officers
University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship Spring 1988 Warrantless Investigative Seizures of Real and Tangible Personal Property
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res
More informationTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND
12 THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW AND THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEE MOTION HEARINS PRACTICE DIVIDER 12 Honorable Ilona M. Holmes Honorable Mark J. Mcinnis OBJECTIVES: After this session,
More informationKyllo v. United States: Innovative or Originalist?
Kyllo v. United States: Innovative or Originalist? *Kristie L. Eshelman Abstract: When the American Founders crafted the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, they could not have foreseen the impact of
More informationConducting surveillance in a public place
Ministerial Policy Statement Conducting surveillance in a public place Summary It is lawful for the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) and the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS)
More informationDrones in Domestic Surveillance Operations: Fourth Amendment Implications and Legislative Responses
: Fourth Amendment Implications and Legislative Responses Richard M. Thompson II Legislative Attorney September 6, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional
More informationBriefing from Carpenter v. United States
Written Material for Inside Oral Argument Briefing from Carpenter v. United States The mock oral argument will be based Carpenter v. United States, which is pending before the Supreme Court of the United
More informationTRAINING OBJECTIVES. Review Search & Seizure Law Relating To Probation/Parole. Describe the Plain View Doctrine
TRAINING OBJECTIVES Review Search & Seizure Law Relating To Probation/Parole Describe the Plain View Doctrine Discuss the Composition and Imposition of Search Conditions 1 TRAINING OBJECTIVES Describe
More information23 Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence
23 Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence Part A. Introduction: Tools and Techniques for Litigating Search and Seizure Claims 23.01 OVERVIEW OF THE CHAPTER AND BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE The Fourth Amendment
More informationVolume 60, Issue 2 Page 503. Stanford. Orin S. Kerr
Volume 60, Issue 2 Page 503 Stanford Law Review FOUR MODELS OF FOURTH AMENDMENT PROTECTION Orin S. Kerr 2007 by Orin S. Kerr and the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, from the
More information7 of 63 DOCUMENTS COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, APPELLANT V. JONATHON SHANE MCMANUS AND ADAM LEVI KEISTER, APPELLEES 2001-SC-0312-DG
Page 1 7 of 63 DOCUMENTS COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, APPELLANT V. JONATHON SHANE MCMANUS AND ADAM LEVI KEISTER, APPELLEES 2001-SC-0312-DG SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY 107 S.W.3d 175; 2003 Ky. LEXIS 146 June
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS. Judgment Rendered June
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2007 KA 2009 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ll n MATTHEW G L CONWAY Judgment Rendered June 6 2008 Appealed from the 18th Judicial District Court In and for
More informationLaw Enforcement Use of High Technology: Does Closing the Door Matter Anymore?
California Western Law Review Volume 24 Number 1 Article 6 1987 Law Enforcement Use of High Technology: Does Closing the Door Matter Anymore? Kenneth Troiano Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr
More informationThe Supreme Court, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 17.245 The Supreme Court, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights Fall 2006 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
More informationAppellate Division, Third Department - People v. Mabeus
Touro Law Review Volume 26 Number 3 Annual New York State Constitutional Issue Article 14 July 2012 Appellate Division, Third Department - People v. Mabeus Christina Pinnola Follow this and additional
More informationDRAFT [8-4-15] TUFTS UNIVERSITY EXPERIMENTAL COLLEGE FALL 2015
DRAFT [8-4-15] TUFTS UNIVERSITY EXPERIMENTAL COLLEGE FALL 2015 COURSE: EXP-0070-F The Law of Search and Seizure in the Digital Age: Applying the Fourth Amendment to Current Technology Tuesday 6:00-8:30PM
More information