Case 2:15-cr DJH Document 60 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 14 FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 2:15-cr DJH Document 60 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 14 FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA"

Transcription

1 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of FILED 0 ELIZABETH A. STRANGE First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona Wallace H. Kleindienst Carolyn Nedder Assistant U.S. Attorneys Arizona State Bar No. 00 Arizona State Bar No. 00 United States Courthouse 0 West Congress, Suite 00 Tucson, Arizona 0 Telephone: wallace.kleindiensttf'usdoi.gov carolyn.nedder@us oj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff DEC 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA United States of America, Plaintiff, vs. Tara Valencia, Defendant. CR--00-PHX-DJH (MHB) CR--009-PHX-DJH (MHB) PLEA AGREEMENT Plaintiff, United States of America, and the defendant, Tara Kathleen Valencia, hereby agree to dispose of this matter on the following terms and conditions:. PLEA The defendant will plead guilty to Counts Two () and Six () of the Superseding Indictment in CR--00-PHX-DJH (MHB). Count Two charges the defendant with a violation of Title, United States Code (U.S.C.) (), Subscribing and Filing A False Individual Income Tax Return, a Class E Felony offense. Count Six charges the defendant with a violation of Title, United States Code (U.S.C.), Wire Fraud, a Class C Felony offense. The defendant will also plead guilty to the Indictment in CR--009-PHX-DJ (MHB), which charges a violation of Title, United States Code (U.S.C.) (a)(l) & (b)(l)(a)(i), Failure To Appear in Court, a Class C felony offense.

2 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of. MAXIMUM PENAL TIES a. A violation of Title, United States Code, Section ( ), is punishable 9 by a maximum fine of $0,000, a maximum term of imprisonment of three years, or both, and a term of supervised release of one year. A violation of Title, United States Code, Section, is punishable by a maximum fine of $0,000, a maximum term of imprisonment of twenty years, or both, and a term of supervised release of three years. A violation of Title, United States Code, Section (a)(l) & (b)( )(A)(l), is punishable by a maximum fine of $0,000, a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years, or both, and a term of supervised release of three years. 0 b. The sentence imposed for a violation of Title, United States Code, Section (a)(l) & (b)(l)(a)(l) must run consecutive to any other sentence imposed by the Court pursuant to this plea agreement. c. According to the Sentencing Guidelines issued pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of, the Court shall order the defendant to: () make restitution to any victim of the offense pursuant to U.S.C. and/or A, unless the Court determines that restitution would not be appropriate; () make restitution to the Internal Revenue Service for any and all taxes, interest, and penalties owed to the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to and consistent with this agreement. () pay a fine pursuant to U.S.C., unless the Court finds that a fine is not appropriate; ( ) serve a term of supervised release when required by statute or when a sentence of imprisonment of more than one year is imposed (with the understanding that the Court may impose a term of supervised release in all other cases); and ( ) pay upon conviction a $00 special assessment for each count to which the defendant pleads guilty pursuant to U.S. C. 0. d. The Court is required to consider the Sentencing Guidelines in determining the defendant's sentence. However, the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory, and the Court - -

3 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of is free to exercise its discretion to impose any reasonable sentence up to the maximum set by statute for the crime(s) of conviction, unless there are stipulations to the contrary that the Court accepts.. AGREEMENTS REGARDING SENTENCING 9 0 a. The parties agree that the total tax loss relating to defendant's conduct (including relevant conduct under the sentencing guidelines) is approximately $,.00. The defendant agrees that for the purpose of the plea agreement, she is also responsible for all of her relevant conduct under the United States sentencing guidelines relating to the tax years for all of the tax violations charged in the Superseding Indictment. The parties also agree that the total loss relating to the Wire Fraud scheme including relevant conduct is $,. b. Stipulation. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. l(c)(l)(c), the United States and the defendant stipulate to the following guideline calculations: (i) Count Two of the Superseding Indictment (False Tax Return) Base Offense Level ($, tax loss) T. Defendant failed to conectly identify the source of income exceeding $0,000 which came from criminal activity Obstructing/Impeding Justice Acceptance of Responsibility Tl.l(b)(l) Total Offense Level with a guideline range of - months. (ii) Count of the Superseding Indictment (Wire Fraud) + + Base Offense Level Bl.l(a)(l) + Loss Exceeds $0,000 Bl.l(b)(l) + Obstructing/Impeding Justice Cl. + Acceptance of Responsibility El..(a) - Total guideline calculation is with a guideline range of - months

4 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of (iii) Failure to Appear in Court 9 0 Base Offense Level Jl.() + Underlying Offense(s) Punishable by years or more in prison Jl.(b)()(A) + 9 Acceptance of Responsibility El. l(a) - Total guideline calculation is with a guideline range of - months. C. The parties further stipulate and agree that Count Two and Sixteen of the Superseding indictment are grouped as closely related counts pursuant to Section Dl. of the Sentencing Guidelines for the purposes of the total guideline calculation. d. The defendant further understands that the sentence imposed upon the Court on the failure to appear count shall run consecutively to the sentence imposed on Counts Two and Sixteen as required by law. e. There are no other agreements as to sentencing and the parties are free to recommend to the Court any sentence within the above guideline ranges. f. Restitution. Pursuant to U.S.C. and/or A, the defendant specifically agrees to pay full restitution, regardless of the resulting loss amount but in no event more than $, (relating to the wire fraud scheme) to all victims directly or proximately harmed by the defendant's "relevant conduct," including conduct pertaining to any dismissed counts or uncharged conduct, as defined by U.S.S.G. lbl., regardless of whether such conduct constitutes an "offense" under U.S.C. 9, or A. The defendant understands that such restitution will be included in the Court's Order of Judgment and that an unanticipated restitution amount will not serve as grounds to withdraw the defendant's guilty plea or to withdraw from this plea agreement. Additionally, the defendant understands that there will be a separate restitution order to the IRS relating to any tax loss as set forth below. g. Agreement To Pay Taxes, Penalties and Interest While On Supervised Release. Within sixty (0) days of the defendant's the commencement of supervised release, the defendant agrees to do the following as a special term of supervised release: - -

5 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of File amended IRS Form 00 tax returns with the IRS for the years 0, 09, 0,and, which reflect the true amount of additional taxable income received by the defendant: (i) in 0 of $,, with additional tax due and owing of $,; (ii) in 09 of $, with additional tax due and owing of $,; (iii) in 0 of $0, with additional tax due and owing of $,9; and (iv) in of $,0 with additional tax due and owing of $,, respectively. The defendant further agrees to file an IRS Form 00 tax return for which reports total taxable income of $, with tax due and owing of $,. These returns must be filed no later than 0 days following 9 commencement of supervised release. The defendant shall provide to the government 0 copies of these returns with a stamp which reflects that they have been filed with the IRS. The defendant agrees to pay and make restitution to the Internal Revenue Service for all taxes, and interest, for these years. This restitution judgment entered by the Court shall be separate and apart from the restitution judgment set forth above relating to the defendant's wire fraud scheme. h. Disclose to the IRS all tangible and intangible assets, over which the defendant has possession, custody and/or control including without limitation cash, bank accounts, real and personal property owned or possessed, directly or indirectly, by the defendant no later than 0 days following the entry of the guilty plea. I. The defendant agrees to cooperate fully and completely with the IRS in paying the above taxes and all penalties and interest, as determined by the IRS, owed by the defendant. This is a specific condition of probation or supervised release. The extent to which she is financially unable to make these payments at any time will be determined by the probation officer as a term of her probation or supervised release. Failure to abide by this term will be a violation of her probation or supervised release. J. Acceptance of Responsibility. If the defendant makes full and complete disclosure to the U.S. Probation Office of the circumstances surrounding the defendant's commission of the offense, and if the defendant demonstrates an acceptance of responsibility for this offense up to and including the time of sentencing, the United States - -

6 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of will recommend a two-level reduction in the applicable Sentencing Guidelines offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. El.l(a). Because the defendant failed to appear for Court and fled to Mexico approximately two years ago, the government will not recommend an additional one level reduction in the applicable Sentencing Guidelines offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. El.l(b).. AGREEMENT TO DISMISS OR NOT TO PROSECUTE a. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. ll(c)(l)(a), the United States, at the time of sentencing, shall dismiss the remaining charges in the Superseding Indictment. 9 b. This agreement does not, in any manner, restrict the actions of the United 0 States in any other district or bind any other United States Attorney's Office.. COURT APPROVAL REQUIRED; REINSTITUTION OF PROSECUTION a. If the Court, after reviewing this plea agreement, concludes that any provision contained herein is inappropriate, it may reject the plea agreement and give the defendant the opportunity to withdraw the guilty plea in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. ll(c)(). b. If the defendant's guilty plea or plea agreement is rejected, withdrawn, vacated, or reversed at any time, this agreement shall be null and void, the United States shall be free to prosecute the defendant for all crimes of which it then has knowledge and any charges that have been dismissed because of this plea agreement shall automatically be reinstated. In such event, the defendant waives any and all objections, motions, and defenses based upon the Statute of Limitations, the Speedy Trial Act, or constitutional restrictions in bringing later charges or proceedings. The defendant understands that any statements made at the time of the defendant's change of plea or sentencing may be used against the defendant in any subsequent hearing, trial, or proceeding subject to the limitations of Fed. R. Evid. 0.. WAIVER OF DEFENSES AND APPEAL RIGHTS The defendant waives () any and all motions, defenses, probable cause determinations, and objections that the defendant could assert to the indictment or - -

7 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of information; and () any right to file an appeal, any collateral attack, and any other writ or motion that challenges the conviction, an order of restitution or forfeiture, the entry of judgment against the defendant, or any aspect of the defendant's sentence, including the manner in which the sentence is determined, including but not limited to any appeals under U.S.C. (sentencing appeals) and motions under U.S.C. and (habeas petitions), and any right to file a motion for modification of sentence, including under U.S.C. (c). This waiver shall result in the dismissal of any appeal, collateral attack, or other motion the defendant might file challenging the conviction, order 9 of restitution or forfeiture, or sentence in this case. This waiver shall not be construed to 0 bar an otherwise-preserved claim of ineffective assistance of counsel or of "prosecutorial misconduct" (as that term is defined by Section II.B of Ariz. Ethics Op. -0 ()).. DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION a. The United States retains the unrestricted right to provide information and make any and all statements it deems appropriate to the U.S. Probation Office and to the Court in connection with the case. b. Any information, statements, documents, and evidence that the defendant provides to the United States pursuant to this agreement may be used against the defendant at any time. c. The defendant shall cooperate fully with the U.S. Probation Office. Such cooperation shall include providing complete and trnthful responses to questions posed by the U.S. Probation Office including, but not limited to, questions relating to: () criminal convictions, history of drug abuse, and mental illness; and () financial information, including present financial assets or liabilities that relate to the ability of the defendant to pay a fine or restitution. d. Nothing in this agreement shall be constrned to protect the defendant from administrative or civil forfeiture proceedings or prohibit the United States from proceeding with and/or initiating an action for civil forfeiture. Pursuant to U.S.C., all monetary penalties, including restitution imposed by the Court, shall be due - -

8 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of immediately upon judgment, shall be subject to immediate enforcement by the United States, and shall be submitted to the Treasury Offset Program so that any federal payment or transfer of returned propeliy the defendant receives may be offset and applied to federal debts (which offset will not affect the periodic payment schedule). If the Comi imposes a schedule of payments, the schedule of payments shall be merely a schedule of minimum payments and shall not be a limitation on the methods available to the United States to enforce the judgment.. ELEMENTS 9 The following are the elements for the offenses to which the Defendant is pleading 0 guilty. The government must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt. Filing A False Return On or about March 0,, in the District of Arizona:... The defendant signed and filed a tax return for the 09 tax year that she knew contained false information as to a material matter; The return contained a a written declaration that it was being signed under the penalties of pejury, In filing the false return, the defendant acted willfully. Wire Fraud Beginning on or about January, 0, and continuing to on or about November,, in the District of Arizona:. The defendant knowingly devised a scheme or plan to defraud or a scheme or plan for obtaining money or propeliy by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises,. The pretenses, representations, or promises made or facts omitted as pali of the scheme or plan were material; that is they had a natural tendency to influence, or were capable of influencing a person to pali with money or propeliy,. The defendant acted with the intent to defraud, that is, she had the intent to deceive or cheat his victims, and - -

9 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page 9 of 9 0. The defendant used, or caused to be used, interstate wire communications to carry out or attempt to carry out an essential part of the scheme. Failure To Appear In Court On or about December,, in the District of Arizona:. The defendant was released from custody with the requirement to appear in Court or before a judicial officer on the above date,. She defendant knew of this required appearance or engaged in a course of conduct designed to avoid notice of her comi date,. The defendant intentionally failed to appear as required.. The case for which the defendant failed to appear charged one or more offenses, each punishable by a term of fifteen () years or more. 9. FACTUAL BASIS a. The defendant admits that the following facts are true and that if this matter were to proceed to trial the United States could prove the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt: The defendant was employed by the Arizona Exterminating Company (AEC), located in Phoenix, Arizona, from 0 through as the Human Resource Administrator. AEC was owned by Oliver Exterminating Company located in Miami, Florida. Her duties included picking up the mail from the Post Office boxes, which included the JP Morgan Chase bank account records, reconciling the corporate credit card statements for credit cards provided employees, maintaining possession of blank AEC company bank checks, the purchase of supplies, and serving as the personal assistant to the General Manager, Doug Wyly. She had a corporate credit card and had access to Wyly' s card. One of her duties was to reconcile and code the AEC credit card statements. On a monthly basis, she prepared an Excel spreadsheet listing the purchases by merchants made by each cardholder. She ed the monthly credit card reconciliation spreadsheet to Jeff Calderon, the corporate controller in Miami. Beginning as early as January 0 and continuing to November,, the defendant embezzled approximately $,, by making unauthorized purchases of goods and services for her own benefit through the use of her credit card, Doug Wyly' s credit card, and AEC bank checks on which she wrote unintelligible, unidentifiable, and/or forged signatures. Some of her unauthorized purchases included such things as a new swimming pool, - 9 -

10 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page 0 of 9 0 liposuction treatments, home maid services, and fertility treatments. She concealed her unauthorized use of the credit cards by falsely changing the nature of the purchases and by allocating them to other AEC employee's credit cards on the spreadsheets ed to the corporate controller. These spreadsheets falsely inflated the credit card charges of the other employees to account for the dollar amount of her credit card charges. On or about June,, the defendant ed in interstate commerce via the internet from her computer in Phoenix to Jeff Calderon's computer in Miami, Florida, a monthly spreadsheet which falsely and fraudulently concealed her unauthorized use of the AEC' s credit cards as paii of her scheme to defraud AEC and the Oliver Exterminating Company. The defendant filed Individual Income Tax Returns with the Internal Revenue Service for the 0 through tax years. She did not file a Return for the tax year. She failed to report on the filed returns the amount of money she embezzled from AEC in that respective year or pay tax on that income. The amount of income for each year and the tax due and owing are correctly set fmih above. On or about March 0,, in Phoenix, Arizona, the defendant submitted to the Internal Revenue Service in Fresno, California, an Individual Income Tax Return for 09, which contained and was verified by a written declaration that was made under the penalty of pejury. That Return was false as to a material matter because it repmied that she only earned $, in income, when in trnth and fact, she earned an additional $, from the money she embezzled from AEC, making her total taxable income to be $,99. The defendant admits that when she filed such return she was aware that the return was false because the return failed to disclose this additional taxable income. On or about July,, the defendant was arrested on the warrant issued from the Superseding Indictment in this case. She was released on her personal recognizance that same day by the U.S. Magistrate Judge with a number of conditions which included maintaining contact with the Pretrial Services Office and appearing at all court dates. On October,, the defendant failed to repmi as required by telephone to Pretrial Services. Pretrial Services made several unsuccessful attempts to contact the defendant and her whereabouts became unknown. On December,, the defendant failed to appear for a status hearing in the case before United States District Court which was scheduled on November,. The defendant was apprehended in Mexico in early November, by Mexican law enforcement officers. She was returned to the District of Arizona on or about November,. b. The defendant shall swear under oath to the accuracy of this statement and, if the defendant should be called upon to testify about this matter in the future, any intentional material inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony may subject the - 0 -

11 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of defendant to additional penalties for pejury or false swearing, which may be enforced by the United States under this agreement. APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT I have read the entire plea agreement with the assistance of my attorney. I understand each of its provisions and I voluntarily agree to it. I have discussed the case and my constitutional and other rights with my attorney. I understand that by entering my plea of guilty I shall waive my rights to plead not guilty, to trial by jury, to confront, cross-examine, and compel the attendance of witnesses, to 9 present evidence in my defense, to remain silent and refuse to be a witness against myself 0 by asserting my privilege against self-incrimination, all with the assistance of counsel, and to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I agree to enter my guilty plea as indicated above on the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. I have been advised by my attorney of the nature of the charges to which I am entering my guilty plea. I have further been advised by my attorney of the nature and range of the possible sentence and that my ultimate sentence shall be determined by the Court after consideration of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines. My guilty plea is not the result of force, threats, assurances, or promises, other than the promises contained in this agreement. I voluntarily agree to the provisions of this agreement and I agree to be bound according to its provisions. I understand that if I am granted probation or placed on supervised release by the Court, the terms and conditions of such probation/supervised release are subject to modification at any time. I further understand that if I violate any of the conditions of my probation/supervised release, my probation/supervised release may be revoked and upon such revocation, notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, I may be required to serve a term of imprisonment or my sentence otherwise may be altered. This written plea agreement, and any written addenda filed as attachments to this plea agreement, contain all the terms and conditions of the plea. Any additional - -

12 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of agreements, if any such agreements exist, shall be recorded in a separate document and may be filed with the Court under seal; accordingly, additional agreements, if any, may not be in the public record. I further agree that promises, including any predictions as to the Sentencing Guideline range or to any Sentencing Guideline factors that will apply, made by anyone (including my attorney) that are not contained within this written plea agreement, are null and void and have no force and effect. I am satisfied that my defense attorney has represented me in a competent manner. 9 I fully understand the terms and conditions of this plea agreement. I am not now 0 using or under the influence of any drng, medication, liquor, or other intoxicant or depressant that would impair my ability to fully understand the terms and conditions of this plea agreement. Date APPROVAL OF DEFENSE COUNSEL I have discussed this case and the plea agreement with my client in detail and have advised the defendant of all matters within the scope of Fed. R. Crim. P., the constitutional and other rights of an accused, the factual basis for and the nature of the offense to which the guilty plea will be entered, possible defenses, and the consequences of the guilty plea including the maximum statutory sentence possible. I have further discussed the concept of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines with the defendant. No assurances, promises, or representations have been given to me or to the defendant by the United States or any of its representatives that are not contained in this written agreement. I concur in the entry of the plea as indicated above and that the terms and conditions set - -

13 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of forth in this agreement are in the best interests of my client. I agree to make a bona fide effoi to ensure that the guilty plea is entered in accordance with all the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P.. Date c Kessler Attorney for Defendant 9 0 APPROVAL OF THE UNITED STATES I have reviewed this matter and the plea agreement. I agree on behalf of the United States that the terms and conditions set forth herein are appropriate and are in the best interests of justice. Date ELIZABETH A. STRANGE First Assistant United States Attorney Di trict of Arizo~a0 A,., ov~ef - -

14 Case :-cr-00-djh Document 0 Filed // Page of 9 0 Date ACCEPTANCE BY THE COURT Honorable Diane J. Humetewa United States. District Judge - -

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A. Case 2:09-cr-00717-ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 1 DENNIS K. BURKE United States Attorney District of Arizona 2 Howard D. Sukenic 3 Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No. 011990 Two

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR. NO. ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT DEFENSE COUNSEL: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY:,Esq.

More information

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKET NO. 3:1 OCR59-W v. PLEA AGREEMENT RODNEY REED CAVERLY NOW COMES the United States of America,

More information

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143 Case :0-cr-00-CJC Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney DENNISE D. WILLETT Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Santa Ana Branch JENNIFER L. WAIER Assistant

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-06-CR-W-FJG ) MICHAEL FITZWATER, ) ) ) Defendant.

More information

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295 Case :-cr-00-fmo Document Filed 0 Page of Page ID #: EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division RITESH SRIVASTAVA (Cal. Bar

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-01-CR-W-FJG ) WILLIAM ENEFF, ) ) ) Defendant. )

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-00106-01-CR-W-DW TIMOTHY RUNNELS, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division (Cal. State Bar # ) 00 North Los Angeles Street Federal Building, Room 1 Los Angeles, California

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, KEVIN CLARK, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT '3: 11~_;-z_ (0! The United States

More information

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT Case 1:09-mj-00015-JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) V. ) ) DWAYNE F. CROSS, ) ) Defendant. ) Case

More information

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STA [ES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-CR- CRAIG HILBORN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT 1. The United States of America, by its attorneys,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-06023-02-CR-SJ-DW ) STEPHANIE E. DAVIS, ) ) Defendant.

More information

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn Case 1:17-cr-00232-RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10 U.S. Department of Justice The Special Counsel's Office Washington, D.C. 20530 November 30, 2017 Robert K. Kelner Stephen P. Anthony Covington

More information

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80 Case :-cr-000-jak Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney PATRICK R. FITZGERALD Assistant United States Attorney Chief, National Security Division ELLEN LANSDEN (Cal.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 09-00296-02-CR-W-FJG ) ERIC G. BURKITT, ) ) ) Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-000297 03-CR-W-FJG ) RONALD E. BROWN, JR., ) ) Defendant.

More information

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby Case 2:13-cr-00171-CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 FILED 2013 Aug-02 AM 10:20 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA lub ~1Jf' -2 ANcl:l:fij UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 1.0 FeJRurftE NORTHERN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-00297-05-CR-W-FJG ) CYNTHIA D. JORDAN, ) ) Defendant.

More information

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 case 3:04-cr-00071-AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:04-CR-71(AS)

More information

United States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015

United States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of Connecticut Abraham Ribicoff Federal Building (860) 947-1101 450 Main Street, Rm. 328 Fax (860) 760-7979 Hartford, Connecticut 06103 www.usdoj.gov/usao/ct

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT BRYAN SCHRODER United States Attorney ADAM ALEXANDER Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 222 West Seventh Avenue, #9, Room 253 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7567 Phone: (907) 271-5071

More information

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

5 CRWIINAL NO. H UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DrVISIOlV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 v. 5 CRWIINAL NO. H-07-218-002 WILLIE CARSON, I11 5 PLEA AGREEMENT The United States of America, by

More information

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19 8:15-cr-00116-JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA vs. Plaintiff, LA WREN CE MERRICK JR.,

More information

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Reserved for Clerk s File Stamp COUNTY: PLAINTIFF: COUNTY OF EL DORADO PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEFENDANT: ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM FOR FELONIES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 11-00261-02-CR-W-GAF ) WILLIAM TROY GOINGS, ) ) Defendant.

More information

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No. Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FILED SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED

More information

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CRIMINAL NO. 1-08 CR 428 ) V- ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1956(h) VIJAY K. TANEJA, j

More information

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows: Case 1:16-cr-00024-CG Document 2 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATALIE REED PERHACS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 10-00025-01-CR-W-HFS ) KHALID OUAZZANI, ) ) Defendant. )

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARBARA BYRD-BENNETT No. 15 CR 620 Hon. Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between

More information

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y: United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia CLERK'S OFFICE Oainmao JUL 12 201 JAMES N. HATTEN, Ciork GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y: DQP0/ Giork UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Cr. No. H-02-0665 BEN F. GLISAN, JR., Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT Pursuant

More information

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT Case &:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12 FARKANSA INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) JAMES IN OPEN COURT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION CHAD C. SPRAKER Assistant U.S. Attorney PAUL JOSEPH Special Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office 901 Front St., Suite 1100 Helena, MT 59626 Phone: (406) 457-5120 Fax: (406) 457-5130 Email: chad.spraker@usdoj.gov

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION USDC IN/ND case 2:17-cr-00153-JVB-APR document 7 filed 11/17/17 page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V ) ) Cause No. 2:17

More information

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT Case 1:18-cr-00114-LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ig F«ssw ^23 P b! 09 MiOEPOSITORY DARREN B. STRATTON PLEA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) vs. ) No. 02 CR 892 ) Hon. Suzanne B. Conlon ENAAM M. ARNAOUT ) PLEA AGREEMENT This Plea Agreement

More information

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - v. - MICHAEL COHEN, Defendant. x INFORMATION 18 Cr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x The Special Counsel charges:

More information

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8 Case 3:06-cr-00308-AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of Connecticut Connecticut Financial Center 157 Church Street (203) 821-3700 rd 23

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. 12-06001-05-CR-SJ-GAF ) CHRISTINA GONZALEZ, ) ) Defendant.

More information

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19 Case 1:17-cr-00102-MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19 ^^^'-^ ^^^^ ^'-^^ AGREEMENT Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CRIMINAL

More information

Case 2:15-cr FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114

Case 2:15-cr FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114 Case 2:15-cr-00590-FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114 1 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney 2 LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division

More information

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24 Case :0-cr-0-R Document Filed /0/00 Page of 0 GEORGE S. CARDONA Acting United States Attorney CHRISTINE C. EWELL Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division WESLEY L. HSU (SBN: 0) Assistant

More information

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152) ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 12-CR-00189-DGK ) CAROL ANN RYSER, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA

More information

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08-00026-02-CR-W-FJG ) CYNTHIA S. MARTIN, ) ) Defendant.

More information

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16 Judge Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEA TILE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO. CR0-0 RSM ) I Plaintiff, v. PLEA AGREEMENT RICHARD W. GIBSON, Defendant. The United

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, DATE FILED IN OPEN COURT D.C. vs. _ Defendant. CASE NO.: / CRIMINAL DIVISION: VIOLATION OF PROBATION/COMMUNITY

More information

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No. U.S. Department of Justice Channing D. Phillips United States Attorney District of Columbia Judiciary Center 555 Fourth St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 September 12, 2016 Richard L. Scheff, Esq. Montgomery

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-00035-01-CR-W-HFS GAGE S. LANKAS, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT

More information

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL Case 3:17-cr-05226-RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL 06 2017 CLERY. U.S. DfST~ICT COURT WESTERN

More information

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. ) IYMAN FARIS, ) a/k/a Mohammad Rauf, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT

More information

Case 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6

Case 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6 Case 3:16-cr-00148-K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6 ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 2o:s APR 14 PM.3: 32 DALLAS DIVISION / Y CL rnx_...

More information

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80 Case :-cr-00-rgk Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division ASHWIN JANAKIRAM (Cal. Bar

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UISTITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, V. CaseNo. i8 C,i~-) ~ PHILIP REII\THART, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT I. The United States of America, by

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 10 CR 655 vs. ) ) Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman SHAKER MASRI ) PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement

More information

LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): SUPCR 1109 FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): FAX NO. (Optional) SUPERIOR COURT OF

More information

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110 Case 2:12-cr-00030-JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CASE NO. 2: 12-CR-30-FtM-99

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 13-00014-02-CR-W-DW ) CHRISTOPHER LEE CURD ) ) Defendant.

More information

Case: 5:16-cr KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342

Case: 5:16-cr KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342 Case: 5:16-cr-00013-KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 16-13-KKC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON Eastern

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant ) PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY The defendant represents to the Court: 1. My

More information

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16 Case 3:17-cr-00083-HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16 IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VICTOR

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 02-37A ) JOHN LINDH, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT Paul J.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH CONLEY No. 12 CR 986 Judge Gary Feinerman PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the

More information

JUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

JUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS JUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Appearance Bond, Secured............................................................ MRCrP 8 Appearance Bond, Unsecured..........................................................

More information

3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5

3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5 3:09-cr-00469-MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BEAN BAG BOYS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

More information

000002

000002 000001 000002 000003 000004 000005 000006 000007 000008 000009 000010 000011 000012 000013 000014 000015 000016 000017 000018 000019 000020 000021 000022 000023 000024 000025 000026 000027 000028 000029

More information

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI Case 2:12-cr-00059-AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 FILED IN OPEN COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MAY -9 2012

More information

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Title... 2 Section 2. Purpose... 2 Section 3. Definitions... 2 Section 4. Fundamental Rights of Defendants... 4 Section 5. Arraignment...

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Criminal Action v. ) No. 07-CR-00087-07-W-NKL ) MARK DELI SILJANDER,

More information

Case 2:14-cr JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100

Case 2:14-cr JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100 Case 2:14-cr-00639-JC Document 41 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:100 1 ANDRE BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney 2 ROBERT E. DUGDALE '.Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Criminal Division

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS VRANAS No. 15 CR 620 Judge Edmond E. Chang PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the

More information

Corporate Administration Detection and Prevention of Fraud and Abuse CP3030

Corporate Administration Detection and Prevention of Fraud and Abuse CP3030 Corporate Administration Detection and Prevention of Fraud and Abuse CP3030 Original Effective Date: May 1, 2007 Revision Date: April 5, 2017 Review Date: April 5, 2017 Page 1 of 3 Sponsor Name & Title:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN ) Filed April 0, 00 LIDIA SPIROFF (CSBN ) SIDNEY A. MAJALYA (CSBN 00) LARA M. KROOP (CSBN ) Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice 0 Golden Gate Avenue Box 0, Room -01 San Francisco,

More information

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs Case 5:13-cr-50004-PKH Document 106 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 538 IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs AUG 2 6

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is For Court Use Only 1. My true full name is 2. I understand that I am pleading GUILTY / NOLO CONTENDERE and admitting the following offenses, prior convictions and special punishment allegations, with the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION Case 2:10-cr-00027-DWM Document 5 Filed 12/29/10 Page 1 of 5 PAULETTE L. STEWART Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney s Office 901 Front Street, Suite 1100 Helena, MT 59626 Phone: (406) 457-5120 FAX:

More information

Case 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14 Case 3:11-cr-00071-DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 11-71 (I) R I)') HORIZON LINES,

More information

Michigan Medicaid False Claims Act

Michigan Medicaid False Claims Act Michigan Medicaid False Claims Act (Mich. Comp. Laws 400.601 to.615) i 400.601. Short title. Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as "the medicaid false claim act". 400.602. Definitions. Sec.

More information

Case 2:15-cr KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996

Case 2:15-cr KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996 Case 2:15-cr-00576-KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996 U.S. Department of Justice United &wes Attorney District ofnew Jersey Lawrence S. Lustberg, Esq. Gibbons P.C. One Gateway Center

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal Number: v. : VIOLATION: Count One: JAMES STEVEN GRILES, : 18 U.S.C. 1505 (Obstruction of Proceedings Defendant.

More information

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP) U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tl e SllvioJ. Mollo B11ilding One Safm Andrew's Pfo::a New York. NtlP York 10007 March 7, 2014 Arthur G. Jakoby, Esq. David

More information

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice Billy J. Williams United States Attorney District of Oregon 1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204-2902

More information

Case 6:15-cr WSS Document 4 (Court only) Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:15-cr WSS Document 4 (Court only) Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 6 Case 6:15-cr-00003-WSS Document 4 (Court only) Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 6 FILED JAN 0 B 2015 IN THE UNiTED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CLERK US. oij COURT WESThRNX WACO DIVISION

More information

STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.

STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Criminal No. 99-233 v. ) ) Filed: 5/20/99 TOKAI CARBON CO., LTD., ) ) Judge Clarence C. Newcomer

More information

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Securities And Exchange Commission v. JSW Financial Inc. et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 7 JINA L. CHOI (N.Y. Bar No. 997) ROBERT L. TASHJIAN (Cal. Bar No. 1007) tashjianr a~see.~ov. STEVEN D. BUCHHOLZ (Cal. Bar

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT SSN: DL#: PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT SSN: DL#: PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. CAUSE NO.: DEFENDANT DOB: SSN: DL#: RACE: GENDER: ADDR: HAIR COLOR: EYE COLOR: PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY

More information

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008 Case 1:08-cr-00369-RJL Document 9 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 10 IL U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Fraud Section DecemberJ, 2008 Scott W. Muller, Esq. Angela T. Burgess, Esq. Davis Polk & Wardwell

More information

Model Annotated Corporate Plea Agreement Last Updated 12/20/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [XXXXXXX] DISTRICT OF [XXXXXXXXX] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Model Annotated Corporate Plea Agreement Last Updated 12/20/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [XXXXXXX] DISTRICT OF [XXXXXXXXX] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Model Annotated Corporate Plea Agreement Last Updated 12/20/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [XXXXXXX] DISTRICT OF [XXXXXXXXX] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [GLOBAL PRODUCTS, INC.], Defendant. ) ) ) ) )

More information

Two of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign

Two of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saini Andrew's Pla=a New York. New York 10007 October 16, 2012 BYE-MAIL, Esq. Federal Defenders

More information

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California Case 8:15-cr-00142-JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. Docket No. SACR 15-00142-JLS Defendant

More information

People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (b), the Presiding

People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (b), the Presiding People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, 2009. Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.5(b), the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Dennis Blaine Evanson (Attorney

More information

Case 2:16-cr LA Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 12 Document 89

Case 2:16-cr LA Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 12 Document 89 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-CR-175 JASON MICHAEL LUDKE, a/k/a "Muhammad Nassir," a/k/a "Muhammad Abdun Naasir al-hannafi,"

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 03-513-A ) ABDURAHMAN M. ALAMOUDI, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 12-06001-09-CR-SJ-GAF ) JULIO CESAR LLANAS-RODRIGUEZ,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-26-2013 USA v. Jo Benoit Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-3745 Follow this and additional

More information

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN 1 1 1 1 NIALL E. LYNCH (CSBN 1) Original Filed //0 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS (CSBN ) MAY Y. LEE (CSBN ) BRIGID S. BIERMANN (CSBN 0) CHARLES P. REICHMANN (CSBN ) U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division

More information