Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA"

Transcription

1 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Magistrate \ S Plaintiff, v. COMPLAINT FOR OF: C'.5U ) Title 8, USC ) (v )(II) Attempted 'ffansportatlon ofillegal ) Aliens and AIding and Abetting Transportation ) of Illegal Aliens Arturo LEYV A JR, ) ) '1'1 MJ 0906 Defendants. ) ) The undersigned complainant being, duly sworn, states: On or about March 14, 2011, within the Southern District of California, defendant Jose Guadalupe CEJA JR and, with the intent to violate the immigration laws of the United States, knowing and in reckless disregard of the fact that certain aliens, namely, Jenaro GONZALEZ-Hernandez, Jenaro GONZALEZ-Hernandez and Miriam PILLE-Almanza, had come to, entered and remained in the United States in violation of law, did transport and move, said aliens within the United States in furtherance of such violation of law; in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and and (a)(i)(a)(v)(ii). ) ) ) f.. And the complainant further states that this complaint is based on the attached statement of facts, which is incorporated herein by reference. SIGNATURE OF COMPLAINANT Ismael Canto Senior Patrol Agent SWORN TO BEFORE ME AND SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESE E, THIS OF March,2011. WIL A. GALLO United States Magistrate Judge

2 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 2 of 9 Arturo LEVVA JR, II PROBABLE CAUSE STATEMENT Furthermore, the complainant states that Jenaro GONZALEZ-Hernandez, Jenaro GONZALEZ- Hernandez and Miriam PILLE-Almanza, are citizens of a country other than the United States; that said aliens have admitted that they are deportable; that their testimony is material, that it is impracticable to secure their attendance at the trial by subpoena; and they are material witnesses in relation to this criminal charge and should be held or admitted to bail pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section On March 14,2011, Border Patrol Agent (BPA) S. Smith was assigned anti- smuggling duties in the Campo Border Patrol Station's area of responsibility. BP A Smith was working in a plain clothes capacity and was driving an unmarked Border Patrol vehicle. At approximately 9:45 PM, BPA Smith was driving westbound on Interstate 8 near Boulevard, California. As BP A Smith was passing the Ribbonwood Road exit he observed two white vans pass his location. BPA Smith observed both vans had government license plates. The first van had Department ofhomeland Security license plates but did not appear to be the body type that Campo Station typically operates. BPA Smith is familiar with the appearance ofdhs plates as they are issued to all ofthe marked Border Patrol vehicles that Campo Station Agents operate. The first vehicle was traveling fast enough that BPA Smith was unable to read the plate or catch up to the vehicle safely. BP A Smith began to speed up as the second van passed his location. BPA Smith observed that the second vehicle had U.S. Government, For Official Use Only, license plates. As the vehicle passed BPA Smith, he noticed that the first "8" in the license plate number did not reflect in his headlights in the same manner as the rest ofthe numbers. In the past, alien smugglers have altered valid vehicle license plates in an attempt to disguise the true identity ofthe vehicle. The possibility that the license plate may be altered made BPA Smith suspicious. BP A Smith passed the van in an attempt to look at, and inside, the vehicle. BPA Smith noticed the front seat passenger was wearing a military style, camouflage uniform. BPA Smith had observed the front passenger was wearing a military uniform that appeared to be issued by the United States Marine Corps or Navy. BPA Smith has served on active duty in both the Marine Corps and Army and is familiar with the appearance of military uniforms and the issued headgear. The rear passenger area windows were tinted, but as the vehicle passed under street lights along the interstate, and as vehicles passed in the other direction, BP A Smith was able to see into the van. BPA Smith observed several individuals in the very rear of the vehicle wearing Marine Corps caps. Due to the abnormalities ofthe license plate and the possible discrepancies with the uniforms the

3 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 3 of 9 out of the vehicle so he could interview him further. BP A Smith again asked where they were going and LEYV A again stated "Joint Service Base". BPA Smith became suspicious that LEYVA was not a Marine and asked LEYVA when the Marine Corps Birthday is. LEYV A stated he did not know. BPA Smith knows the Marine Corps birthday is one ofthe first things taught to all Marines in basic training. At that time, BPA Smith knew LEYVA's claim of being a U.S. Marine was false. At the same time, BP A Robinson approached the passenger side of the vehicle and identified himself as a Border Patrol Agent. BPA Robinson asked the passenger where they were coming from. The front seat passenger, later identified as Jose Guadalupe CEJA Jr., stated they were coming from Yuma, Arizona. BPA Robinson has also served in the U.S. Marine Corps and is familiar with the uniforms and typical responses most Marines will give to questions regarding the Marine Corps. BP A Robinson observed that some ofthe individual in the van were wearing desert digital style uniforms and some were wearing urban digital style uniforms. BP A Robinson asked CEJA what Marine Corps unit he served in and CEJA failed to answer. BPA Robinson observed that CEJA did not appear to understand English. BPA Robinson asked CEJA ifhe spoke English and CEJA stated "no, not good". BPA Robinson asked CEJA the same question, regarding his unit, in Spanish. CEJA failed to respond again. BPA Robinson asked CEJA his name and CEJA failed to respond. CEJA was wearing a uniform with the name "LOPEZ" clearly marked on the front of it. At that time BP A Robinson noticed the driver had the same name displayed on the uniform he was wearing. BP A Robinson asked CEJA if he was a Marine and CEJA stated he was not. While BP A Smith was interviewing LEYVA and BP A Robinson was interviewing CEJA, BPA Baucom had tapped on the cargo doors and requested the occupants to open it. BP A Baucom identified himself as a Border Patrol Agent and questioned the occupants as their citizenship. The individuals in the rear of the van stated they were citizens of Mexico. BP A Baucom asked them to produce immigration documents and all of the subjects stated they did not have any. At approximately 10:05 PM BP A Baucom placed the individuals in the rear of the van under arrest for being illegally present in the United States. At approximately 10:06 PM, BPA Smith placed LEYVA under arrest for alien smuggling. At approximately 10:06 PM, BPA Robinson placed CEJA under arrest for alien smuggling. BPA Smith thought the first white van might possibly be involved in the same smuggling event in tandem with the second white van in secondary inspection. As other agents started to arrive in secondary inspection to assist, BP A Smith relayed his suspicion about the first white van. At approximately 10:07 PM, BPA Iniguez questioned LEYVA and asked him ifhe was following or being followed by another vehicle. LEYV A said "he was following a green Eclipse". BP A Iniguez and BPA Estrada immediately went inside the checkpoint and reviewed the tapes of the vehicles

4 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 4 of 9 passing through the checkpoint. After reviewing the tape of the vehicles passing through the primary inspection area, BPA Iniguez and BP A Estrada observed a green Mitsubishi Eclipse come through after both suspect vans at approximately 10:05 PM. BP A Estrada radioed agents working west of the checkpoint, as well as Boulevard agents working at the eastbound Interstate 8 Border Patrol Checkpoint, to be on the lookout for the green Mitsubishi Eclipse. LEYVA, CEJA, the other 13 passengers and the white van were transported to the Campo Border Patrol Station for interview and processing. Eastbound Interstate 8 Boulevard Checkpoint On March 14,2011, BPA C. Harms, a member of the Boulevard Station Abatement Team (BLV SAT), was performing anti-smuggling duties in and around the town of Jacumba, California. Jacumba, California is located approximately 25 miles east ofthe Tecate, California Port ofentry and is directly north of the United StateslMexico International Boundary. At approximately 10:45 PM, an all points bulletin was broadcast via agency radio regarding a dark green Mitsubishi Eclipse believed to be involved in an alien smuggling event apprehended at the Interstate 8 westbound checkpoint. A full vehicle description was provided along with a description of the driver. At approximately 11 :30 PM, a vehicle matching the bulletin arrived at the primary inspection point at the Interstate 8 eastbound checkpoint near Jacumba. Agents working at the checkpoint instructed the driver of the vehicle, later identified as Guadalupe GARCIA, Jr., to drive his vehicle into the secondary inspection area. At the secondary inspection area, BPA Harms, BP A Gonzalez, and Supervisory Border Patrol Agent (SBPA) B. Soto, interviewed GARCIA. GARCIA stated that he was originally traveling westbound towards San Diego, California, but was having vehicular problems and was now returning eastbound to Calexico, California. SBP A Soto telephoned SBP A Adam Brooke of the Campo Border Patrol Station and asked for additional information regarding the bulletin. SBP A Brooke told SBP A Soto that an imposter military van had been stopped at the Interstate 8 westbound checkpoint with 13 illegal aliens wearing imposter United States Marine Corps uniforms. Border Patrol Agents observed the vehicle GARCIA was driving as being involved in the smuggling attempt. BP A Gonzalez asked GARCIA for consent to search his vehicle. GARCIA consented to the search of his vehicle and BPA Gonzalez encountered several sets ofunited States Marine Corps rank; insignia

5 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 5 of 9 underneath the passenger's seat. When BP A Gonzalez questioned GARCIA about the military insignia, GARCIA denied the insignias were his. BPA Harms asked GARCIA several questions about the vehicle's history to which GARCIA gave vague and blatantly false answers. BPA Harms explained to GARCIA that his explanations for the vehicle and his whereabouts were blatantly false and he believed GARCIA was lying. At approximately 11 :52 PM, SBP A Soto placed GARCIA under arrest for his suspected participation in the smuggling event at the Interstate 8 westbound checkpoint. ***********************DEFENDANT STATEMENT #1 ********************* LEYVA, Arturo: LEYVA Jr. stated approximately one year ago he met a man named Michael in Calexico. LEYVA Jr. stated he was introduced to Michael through his high school friend Joseph as a person who could help him earn money_ LEYVA described Michael as a short, chubby Hispanic man in his mid-twenties. LEYVA stated that Michael was possibly a United States citizen because he attended school in the United States. LEYVA stated at their initial meeting Michael offered him a job to smuggle drugs in a vehicle across the international boundary. LEYVA stated he initially accepted the offer, but then declined to participate moments before then event was planned to occur. LEYV A stated approximately two weeks ago he was at a gentlemen's club named Porky's in Mexicali, Mexico where he again ran into Michael who recognized him from their previous dealings. leyva stated Michael approached him and told LEYVA that he owed him money for not participating in their earlier drug smuggling event as promised. LEYVA stated Michael then told him that in order to repay his debt he would have to participate in five human smuggling events. LEYVA stated Michael then took him to a house at an unknown location in Mexicali, Mexico where he was briefed about tonight's smuggling event. LEYV A stated at the house, Michael introduced him to a man named Ismael who was in charge of coordinating human smuggling events. LEYVA described Ismael as a younger, short, skinny, Hispanic male with a short military style haircut. LEYVA stated Ismael told him that on his first smuggling attempt he would be provided with a large van having U.S. government plates, and U.S. military uniforms in order to conceal their identities. LEYVA stated Ismael also promised to provide him with a cellular phone for contact at a later date. LEYVA stated two days later while at school, a man later identified as Guadalupe GARCIA handed him a phone and told him it was for his upcoming job. LEYVA was shown a six-person photographic lineup labeled "Exhibit B" and positively identified photograph number four as Guadalupe GARCIA as the person who handed him the phone. LEYVA stated he knew this individual only as Jose.

6 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 6 of 9 LEYVA stated on March 14,2011 at approximately 10:30 AM, Ismael contacted him on the phone he was given by GARCIA. LEYV A stated Ismael told him there would be work today and that he would contact him later. LEYVA stated at approximately 3:30 PM Ismael called him and told him he would be providing LEYVA with a taxi ride from his house in El Centro, California to the Wal-Mart parking lot in Calexico, California. LEYVA stated once at the Wal-Mart, Ismael told him that someone would be there shortly to pick him up. LEYVA stated a green Mitsubishi Eclipse driven by GARCIA approached him in the parking lot where he then got in. LEYVA stated Garcia then drove him to the 7- Eleven near the comer ofrockwood Road in Calexico. LEYVA stated there was a white full-size van, with Mexican license plates, waiting in the 7 -Eleven parking lot. LEYVA stated GARCIA then instructed him to get into the van and drove off. LEYVA stated inside the van, a man was in driver seat, later identified as Jose Guadalupe CEJA Jr. LEYVA was shown a six-person photographic lineup labeled "Exhibit A" and positively identified photograph number five as Jose Guadalupe CEJA Jr. who was in the van. LEYV A stated at that time CEJA Jr. was wearing civilian clothing. LEYVA stated from there CEJA Jr. drove the van to a shopping plaza in Calexico where they pulled into a parking lot behind the Fitness Gym. LEYVA stated once there CEJA Jr. called GARCIA and let him know they were in position. LEYVA stated shortly thereafter an orange and black Honua minivan pulled up and dropped off three people who got in the back seats ofthe van. LEYVA stated CEJA Jr. then drove the van to a church parking lot at the intersection of Ross and Imperial Avenues. in Calexico. LEYV A stated once there CEJA Jr. received another phone call. LEYVA stated shortly thereafter a late model black Ford Mustang showed up and dropped off four to five additional individuals who also go into the back seats ofthe van. LEYVA stated CEJA Jr. then drove the van down Imperial A venue to Adams Road into a trailer park. LEYVA stated once at the trailer park they pulled up to unit #32 where there rest ofthe individuals involved in the smuggling event all got in the back seats ofthe van. LEYV A stated at this time everyone was still wearing civilian clothing. LEYV A stated the van then again met up with the green Mitsubishi Eclipse driven by GARCIA and followed it to a second trailer park in Seeley, California. LEYVA described the trailer park as having a man made pond attached to it. LEYVA stated at the second trailer park CEJA Jr. pulled the van under some trees near the pond. LEYVA stated GARCIA then left and said he would return soon.: LEYVA stated an unknown man then arrived with two large green military style duffle bags full ofmilitary clothing. LEYVA described the man as a short, skinny, Hispanic male. LEYVA stated the unknown man also started to change the Mexican license plates on the van to U.S. government plates he had brought along with him. LEYVA stated CEJA Jr. then instructed everyone else to change out from their clothes into the military clothing. LEYVA stated the unknown man then instructed ClUA Jr. to make sure the younger men in the group sat towards the front ofthe van. LEYVA stated CEJA Jr. then

7 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 7 of 9 instructed him to put on the green uniforms because they would be sitting upfront. LEYV A stated the unknown man also started to coach CEJA Jf. on what to say if stopped at the Border Patrol checkpoint, but became frustrated by CEJA Jr. IS poor English skills. LEYV A stated the unknown man then instructed LEYVA that he would drive instead. LEYVA stated the man told him if questioned at the checkpoint to say they were all coming from the Yuma Air Force base en route to the March Air Force base in Riverside, California. LEYVA stated the unknown man then left and GARICA retuned shortly thereafter in the green Mitsubishi Eclipse. LEYVA stated everyone then loaded into the van where he followed the green Mitsubishi Eclipse to the Interstate 8 freeway. LEYVA stated he then drove west on the freeway, passing the Eclipse, until he was eventually arrested at the Border Patrol checkpoint. LEYVA stated Ismael originally instructed him that he would be driving the van to an unknown location near the Los Angeles area. LEYV A stated once there the individuals would be unloaded, retuned to their civilian clothing, and picked up by other parties. LEYVA stated Ismael instructed him to then switch the plates on the van back to the Mexican placards and return the van to Calexico where he would be paid. LEYVA stated he was promised $ in compensation for each undocumented alien he transported. LEYV A stated he knew the individuals in the van would be undocumented citizens of Mexico without the proper document to be or remain legally in the United States. LEYVA also stated that he knew he was committing a crime by transporting the undocumented aliens for financial gain. ** ** *** * * * * * * * ** ** ** *** * * DEFENDANT STATEMENT#3* ** * * * * ** ** ** **** ** * GARCIA, Guadalupe: Agent Zepeda asked GARCIA how he became involved in this criminal activity. GARCIA stated he attended a party in San Felipe, Mexico, with his friends. GARCIA stated that he and his friend Jose, aka "Mago", overheard a conversation from one of their acquaintances talking about transporting undocumented aliens. GARCIA stated one of the acquaintances told him if he was interested in accepting the job offer, he was going to get a phone call the very next day from a miscellaneous person giving him further details. GARCIA stated he decided to take the offer because he has been unemployed for 8 months. GARCIA stated the next day he received a phone call from an unknown man telling GARCIA what role he was going to play in this illegal act. GARCIA stated the man promised him he was not going to drive any undocumented aliens but was going to be a scout looking for the Border Patrol and to see if the Border Patrol Checkpoint was closed. GARCIA stated he was going to receive $ for helping this unknown man and ifhe was successful, he was going to receive more work from this individual.

8 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 8 of 9 II GARCIA stated he met with Jose, later identified as Jose Guadalupe CEJA Jr., on Monday March 14, 2011, at approximately 7:00 PM. when they crossed together through the Calexico Port of Entry. GARCIA stated he dropped off CEJA at an unknown location close to the port of entry. GARCIA stated he was instructed to drive westbound and observe traffic on the Interstate 8 and lookout for Border Patrol. GARCIA stated he drove westbound on the Interstate 8 until reaching the Border Patrol checkpoint. GARCIA stated he was then scouting the agents to see if they were sending vehicles to secondary inspection or just waving cars through the point. GARCIA stated after he drove through the checkpoint, he exited off the westbound lanes and drove eastbound until he arrived at Jacumba. GARCIA stated he went to the Chevron gasoline station to wait for Jose to call him so he could drive in front ofthe loaded vehicle that had the undocumented aliens. GARCIA stated once they were to successfully pass through the Border Patrol checkpoint, their goal was to drive west on the Interstate 8 and eventually take Interstate 15 and drop offthe undocumented aliens at an unknown location. GARCIA was shown a six-person photographic lineup labeled IIExhibit An and positively identified photograph number five as Jose Guadalupe CEJA Jr., as the passenger in the van transporting the undocumented aliens. GARCIA was shown a six-person photographic lineup labeled "Exhibit cn and could not positively identify any of the photographs as the driver involved in today's events. GARCIA was again questioned by Agent Zepeda as to his role in this event. GARCIA stated his role was to act as a scout driver looking for Border Patrol agents that could intercept the smuggling load. GARCIA was again questioned as to how much monetary gain he was going to make scouting for the vehicle that carried the undocumented aliens. GARCIA stated he was going to earn $ ****************************MATERIAL WITNESS STATEMENTS*********** Material Witnesses Jenaro GONZALEZ-Hernandez, Jenaro GONZALEZ-Hernandez and Miriam PILLE-Almanza stated that they are citizens and nationals ofmexico illegally present in the United States. They stated they did not have any immigration documents allowing them to be in the United States legally. They stated that arrangements had been made in Mexicali B.c. Mexico to be smuggled into the United States. All material witnesses stated that they were to pay between 3,000 and 3,800 U. S. dollars to be smuggled into the United States. All material witnesses were shown a six-pack photographic line-up, all of the material witnesses were not able to positively identify the defendants as the driver and passenger ofthe vehicle.

9 Case 3:11-mj WVG Document 1 Filed 03/16/11 Page 9 of 9 The green Mitsubishi Eclipse, bearing California license plate 4NGX642, was not reported stolen and is being seized under Title 8 and will be turned over to the asset forfeiture office. The vehicle had a positive 72 hour lane check. While investigating the crossing history of the vehicle Agents discovered that both GARCIA Jr. and CEJA Jr. crossed in the Mitsubishi through the Calexico West port of entry on 03114/2011 at 8:07 PM. Both Government plates, bearing number G D, are being seized as evidence in the case ofthe U.S. vs. LEYVA Jr., CEJA Jr., and GARCIA Jr.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Wright State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, SAMARA LEIGH JUHL DOB: 01/27/1994 7734 Lancaster Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55301 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No. District

More information

Preparedness Kit. Deportation. What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family

Preparedness Kit. Deportation. What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family Deportation Preparedness Kit What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family Published with generous funding from the Price Philanthropies Foundation November 2014 P.O. Box 87131 San Diego, CA 92138-7131

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, SHAWN DEVEON MONDIE DOB: 05/26/1994 9135 BURNSIDE STREET CHICAGO, IL 60617 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, EMANUEL ANTONIO PATTERSON DOB: 04/26/1993 1252 Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the AO 91 (Rev. 11/11 Criminal Complaint UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District District of Columbia of United States of America v. SHARAFAT ALI KHAN a/k/a DR. NAKIB Defendant(s Case No. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Dakota State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, ALBERTO PEREZ-MARTIN DOB: 01/23/1980 7857 Mount Shasta Cir Las Vegas, NV 89145 Defendant. District Court 1st Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

Preparedness Kit. Deportation. What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family

Preparedness Kit. Deportation. What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family Deportation Preparedness Kit What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family Published with generous funding from: P.O. Box 87131 San Diego, CA 92138-7131 619.232.2121 info@aclusandiego.org www.aclusandiego.org

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, ANTHONY TERELL FORD DOB: 09/03/1994 8452 Yates Ave N Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, TYREL LAMAR PATTERSON DOB: 04/13/1989 1818 BRYANT AVE N Minneapolis, MN 55411 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No. District

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, PIERRE BARLEE COLLINS DOB: 03/15/1982 5450 Douglas Dr. N. #129 Crystal, MN 55429 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District

More information

Case 3:18-mj JLB Document 1 Filed 08/08/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:18-mj JLB Document 1 Filed 08/08/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ~-~. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Case 3:18-mj-04365-JLB Document 1 Filed 08/08/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Fll~~ED AUG 0 8 2018 j CU:.HK US Di~) ; HICT COUHT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS Case 3:14-cv-04266-B Document 1 Filed 12/03/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 David Antón Armendáriz Lance Curtright Marisol Linda Perez Juan Carlos Rodriguez De Mott, McChesney, Curtright & Armendáriz, LLP 800

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Washington State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, NHAN LAP TRAN DOB: 01/28/1979 699 Guthrie Avenue Oakdale, MN 55128 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No. District Court

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MARIE JESSICA HALL DOB: 12/17/1991 7700 Penn Avenue S Apt 147 Richfield, MN 55423 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No.

More information

A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO

A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO This booklet is intended to provide information about the police services available in Toronto, how to access police services,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-24-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, HOWARD WILLIAM AMOS DOB: 07/06/1980 1212 S 9TH ST Minneapolis, MN 55404 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

ARLENE PRISCILLA GARCIA

ARLENE PRISCILLA GARCIA Page: 1 of 8 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: 2119137 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Arlene Priscilla Garcia (DOB: 02/20/1959)

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, NATALIIA MYKHAYLIVNA KARIA DOB: 08/17/1974 2712 Humboldt Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55408 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TERRENCE BRESSI, Case No. Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT. vs.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TERRENCE BRESSI, Case No. Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT. vs. 1 1 Ralph E. Ellinwood Ralph E. Ellinwood, Attorney at Law, PLLC SBA: 0 PO Box 01 Tucson, AZ 1 Phone: (0) 1- Fax: () 1- ree@yourbestdefense.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT

More information

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Daniel M. Gilleon (SBN 00) The Gilleon Law Firm 0 Columbia Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Tel:.0./Fax:.0. dmg@mglawyers.com Steve Hoffman (SBN

More information

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER STATE OF MARYLAND

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER STATE OF MARYLAND UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0273 September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER v. STATE OF MARYLAND Kehoe, Leahy, Davis, Arrie W. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ. Opinion

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): County of Faribault, Plaintiff, vs. ANTHONY HECTOR ENRIQUEZ DOB: 04/17/1990 District Court 5th Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 18CR00503 Court File No. COMPLAINT Order of Detention Defendant. The

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:  Part of the Administrative Law Commons University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-8-2008 Tennessee Department

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Wright State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, CODY SCOTT PECH DOB: 08/23/1994 9161 DUNLAP AVENUE LEXINGTON, MN 55014 Defendant. District Court 10th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, DEJON FRAZIER DOB: 01/22/1997 14729 CHICAGO AV #6 BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland

Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, CLINTON ANGWENYI OMUYA DOB: 10/31/1992 10729 CAVELL RD BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr WJZ-1. versus

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr WJZ-1. versus Case: 12-12235 Date Filed: 06/20/2013 Page: 1 of 10 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-12235 D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60221-WJZ-1 versus

More information

U.S. v. ARVIZU U.S. Supreme Court January 15, 2002

U.S. v. ARVIZU U.S. Supreme Court January 15, 2002 U.S. v. ARVIZU U.S. Supreme Court January 15, 2002 (A unanimous Court affirms that the test for determining reasonable suspicion for Terry v. Ohio investigative stops, including vehicles, is a liberal,

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Dakota State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, JOHN DAVID EMERSON DOB: 04/12/1948 3710 145th Street #210 Rosemount, MN 55068 Defendant. District Court 1st Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

Case 1:16-cr RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2016 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COVERSHEET

Case 1:16-cr RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2016 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COVERSHEET Case 1:16-cr-20904-RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2016 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Misc. No. _1_6-_m... i~-3_4_4~7 IN RE: COMPLAINT -----------------

More information

Case 1:17-cv JL Document 1 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:17-cv JL Document 1 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Case 1:17-cv-00333-JL Document 1 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. Forty Six Thousand Dollars ($46,000.00

More information

COUNTY ATTORNEY HOMICIDE CHARGES IN DEATH OF OWNER OF MAHTOMEDI BAR

COUNTY ATTORNEY HOMICIDE CHARGES IN DEATH OF OWNER OF MAHTOMEDI BAR OFFICE OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY ATTORNEY PETER J. ORPUT COUNTY ATTORNEY Press Release Contact: Pete Orput Phone: 651-430-6115 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: January 26, 2015 HOMICIDE CHARGES IN DEATH OF OWNER

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Lopez, 2010-Ohio-2462.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93197 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ROBERTO LOPEZ DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Immigration and the Southwest Border. Effect on Arizona. Joseph E. Koehler Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona

Immigration and the Southwest Border. Effect on Arizona. Joseph E. Koehler Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona Immigration and the Southwest Border Effect on Arizona Joseph E. Koehler Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona 1 Alien Traffic Through Arizona More than forty-five five percent of all illegal

More information

CASE NO. 1D The evidence at the suppression hearing showed that asset-protection

CASE NO. 1D The evidence at the suppression hearing showed that asset-protection IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-577

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Rice State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, JOSHUA PAUL BARRON DOB: 07/02/1983 23440 Northfield Blvd Hampton, MN 55031 Defendant. District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

SENTENCE NOTE OF MR JUSTICE GOOSE 25 MAY 2018

SENTENCE NOTE OF MR JUSTICE GOOSE 25 MAY 2018 IN THE CROWN COURT AT BIRMINGHAM R v KAYNE ROBINSON, DARIELLE WILLIAMS, DEVONTE MAY & GEARY BARNETT SENTENCE NOTE OF MR JUSTICE GOOSE 25 MAY 2018 1. Kayne Robinson and Darielle Williams, you have both

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Rice State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, DEANDRE DONTAL MCGOWAN DOB: 08/15/1985 1101 80th St E #302 Bloomington, MN 55420 Defendant. District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY G. DUGAN, Judge. Affirmed.

APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY G. DUGAN, Judge. Affirmed. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 3, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. COMMONWEALTH OF : NO ,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : : Relief Act Petition

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. COMMONWEALTH OF : NO ,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : : Relief Act Petition IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF : NO. 03-10,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : MICHAEL W. McCLOSKEY, : Defemdant s Amended Post Conviction Defendant : Relief

More information

15 16 Plaintiff Terrence Bressi ("Bressi"), by and through his attorney, submits Plaintiff's

15 16 Plaintiff Terrence Bressi (Bressi), by and through his attorney, submits Plaintiff's 1 David J. Euchner 7465 East Broadway, Suite 201 2 Tucson, AZ 85710 3 TEL FAX (520) {520) 326-3550 326-0419.::., David J. Euchner, SBN #021768 4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, ANTHONY LAMONT FOOTE DOB: 08/05/1992 608 SELBY AVE #4 St. Paul, MN 55101 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

Handbook for Strengthening Harmony Between Immigrant Communities and the Edmonton Police Service

Handbook for Strengthening Harmony Between Immigrant Communities and the Edmonton Police Service Handbook for Strengthening Harmony Between Immigrant Communities and the Edmonton Police Service Handbook for Strengthening Harmony This handbook is intended to help you understand the role of policing

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, BENJAMIN LOVE DOB: 11/27/1972 5649 34TH AVE S #2 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,547 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. RAYMOND CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ, Appellant,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,547 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. RAYMOND CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ, Appellant, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,547 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS RAYMOND CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2018. Affirmed. Appeal from

More information

MOTION TO SUPPRESS. 1. Approximately 78 grams of marijuana seized from the co-defendants vehicle on

MOTION TO SUPPRESS. 1. Approximately 78 grams of marijuana seized from the co-defendants vehicle on STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. 08CRSXXXXX STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA vs. SP MOTION TO SUPPRESS COMES NOW, Defendant, SP, by and through

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, SILAS TIMOTHY MCDOUGAL DOB: 11/10/1998 304 26th AVE N Minneapolis, MN 55411 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Rice District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 0660041949 Court File No. 66-CR-18-300 State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, HEATHER ANNE ANDERSON-LARSCHEID DOB:

More information

Complaint DEFENDANT. Statute Number & Description. Level

Complaint DEFENDANT. Statute Number & Description. Level State of Minnesota County of Washington Complaint District Court AMENDED COMPLAINT TAB CHARGE PREVIOUSLY FILED DATE FILED PROSECUTOR FILE NO. CR-2008-1522 Court File No. STATE OF MINNESOTA, PLAINTIFF,

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2016-0289, State of New Hampshire v. Peter A. Dauphin, the court on December 13, 2017, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case :-cr-000-dcb-bpv Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 LAURA E. DUFFY United States Attorney TODD W. ROBINSON Special Attorney California State Bar No. FRED SHEPPARD Special Attorney California State Bar

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Case 1:18-cv-00040-SPW Document 1 Filed 02/22/18 Page 1 of 16 Shahid Haque BORDER CROSSING LAW FIRM 7 West 6th Avenue, Ste. 2A Helena, MT 59624 (406) 594-2004 Matt Adams (pro hac vice application forthcoming)

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, EMERY JARRIS WINFORD DOB: 08/07/1975 483 Lynnhurst Ave W Apt 19 St. Paul, MN 55104 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, CEDRIC LAMAR SMITH JR DOB: 09/27/1996 5505 Brookdale Dr N Apt 212 Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION INTRODUCTION 0 0 Mark E. Merin (State Bar No. 0) Paul H. Masuhara (State Bar No. 0) LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 00 F Street, Suite 00 Sacramento, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-Mail: mark@markmerin.com

More information

Said acts constituting the offense of Murder in the Second Degree in violation of MN Statute: (1); Maximum Sentence: 40 years.

Said acts constituting the offense of Murder in the Second Degree in violation of MN Statute: (1); Maximum Sentence: 40 years. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY Page: 1 of 9 DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: 2092182 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Joshua Michael Martin (DOB: 10/05/1988)

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, vs. DAVID EDWARD CAMPBELL DOB: 07/26/1958 NPA Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 17A11291 Court File

More information

CARLOS VIVEROS COLORADO

CARLOS VIVEROS COLORADO Page: 1 of 8 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: 2113905 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Carlos Viveros Colorado (DOB: 07/22/1961)

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : CR-1373-2015 v. : : BARRY JOHN RINEHIMER, : CRIMINAL DIVISION Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER On September 25,

More information

Said acts constituting the offense of Murder in the Second Degree in violation of MN Statute: (1) Maximum Sentence: 40 years.

Said acts constituting the offense of Murder in the Second Degree in violation of MN Statute: (1) Maximum Sentence: 40 years. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY Page: 1 of 9 DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: 2140615 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Joseph James Derks (DOB: 02/08/1994)

More information

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRYAN KEITH HESS NO. COA Filed: 21 August 2007

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRYAN KEITH HESS NO. COA Filed: 21 August 2007 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRYAN KEITH HESS NO. COA06-1413 Filed: 21 August 2007 Search and Seizure investigatory stop vehicle owned by driver with suspended license reasonable suspicion An officer had

More information

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Diego, California. United States Attorney Karen P. Hewitt

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Diego, California. United States Attorney Karen P. Hewitt NEWS RELEASE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Diego, California United States Attorney Karen P. Hewitt For Further Information, Contact: Assistant U. S. Attorney

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,210 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DEZAREE JO MCQUEARY, Appellant.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,210 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DEZAREE JO MCQUEARY, Appellant. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 115,210 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DEZAREE JO MCQUEARY, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Saline District

More information

SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Her Majesty the Queen. Gordon Robert Hippenstall. Before: The Honourable Justice Benjamin B.

SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Her Majesty the Queen. Gordon Robert Hippenstall. Before: The Honourable Justice Benjamin B. SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. Hippenstall 2012 PESC 1 Date: 20120103 Docket: S2-GC-92 Registry: Summerside Her Majesty the Queen V. Gordon Robert Hippenstall Before: The Honourable

More information

No. 103,358 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, ABBY L. RALSTON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

No. 103,358 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, ABBY L. RALSTON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT No. 103,358 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ABBY L. RALSTON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Whether a defendant has abandoned property is an issue of standing.

More information

Arrest, Search, and Seizure

Arrest, Search, and Seizure Criminal Law for Paralegals: Chapter 2 Introduction Tab Text Chapter 2 Arrest, Search, and Seizure Introduction This chapter addresses arrests, searches, and seizures. Both arrests and search warrants

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, GORSUCH and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, GORSUCH and MATHESON, Circuit Judges. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT April 24, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. CINDY

More information

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT. STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. WD78413 ) CHRISTOPHER P. HUMBLE, ) ) Respondent.

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT. STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. WD78413 ) CHRISTOPHER P. HUMBLE, ) ) Respondent. IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. WD78413 ) CHRISTOPHER P. HUMBLE, ) ) Respondent. ) APPEAL TO THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,782 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,782 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, Affirmed. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,782 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. MICHEL ROBERTO ALVAREZ-GARCIA, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from

More information

Case 1:18-cv HSO-JCG Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 Page 1 of 34

Case 1:18-cv HSO-JCG Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 Page 1 of 34 Case 1:18-cv-00354-HSO-JCG Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 Page 1 of 34 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION MARCOS MARTINEZ and ) STEPHANIE MARTINEZ, on

More information

SECOND TIME PIMP SENTENCED TO LENGTHY PRISON SENTENCE

SECOND TIME PIMP SENTENCED TO LENGTHY PRISON SENTENCE SECOND TIME PIMP SENTENCED TO LENGTHY PRISON SENTENCE County Attorney Pete Orput today announced that Shaun Michael Maubach, 32, of Mahtomedi entered a guilty plea to Sex Trafficking of an individual.

More information

2nd Judicial District. County of Ramsey. District Court. State of Minnesota. Prosecutor File No Court File No.

2nd Judicial District. County of Ramsey. District Court. State of Minnesota. Prosecutor File No Court File No. State of Minnesota County of Ramsey District Court 2nd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 0620382177 Court File No. 62-CR-17-2868 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT Order of Detention vs. ISAIAH

More information

JUSTIFICATION FOR STOPS AND ARRESTS

JUSTIFICATION FOR STOPS AND ARRESTS JUSTIFICATION FOR STOPS AND ARRESTS PLUS INFORMANTS slide #1 THOMAS K. CLANCY Director National Center for Justice and Rule of Law The University of Mississippi School of Law University, MS 38677 Phone:

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, JAMAR PIERRE MULLINS DOB: 12/11/1984 1027 Morgan Ave N Apt 14 Minneapolis, MN 55411 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, KENNETH WALTER LILLY DOB: 06/22/1987 165 WESTERN AVE NORTH #500 ST PAUL, MN 55102 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Rice State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, GORDON JAMES BOKMAN DOB: 12/17/1982 1230 2nd Ave NW Defendant. District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. A-15-0312 Court

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEMETRIUS WILLIAMS, And JOHN K. PATTERSON, COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-00056 ERIK H. MICHALSEN, MICHAEL A. POWELL, [Trial

More information

By and through his counsel, Michael H. Sussman, plaintiff hereby states and alleges against defendants:

By and through his counsel, Michael H. Sussman, plaintiff hereby states and alleges against defendants: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------x VINCENT A. FERRI, Plaintiff, vs. COMPLAINT NICHOLAS VALASTRO, JOHN DOE I AND JOHN DOE II,

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Rice State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, AUSTIN JAMES VALENZUELA DOB: 08/21/1998 29 1st Ave NW #1 Defendant. District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 0660041185

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MAURICE TYRONE FOREST DOB: 12/03/1980 2929 Chicago Ave S Apt 301 Minneapolis, MN 55407 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District

More information

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and 4:15-cv-04028-SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 E-FILED Friday, 13 March, 2015 05:01:04 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0271p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. KEVIN PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Rice State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, vs. RONDA KAY KUKLOCK DOB: 11/19/1957 District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 0660043058 Court File No. 66-CR-18-1809 COMPLAINT

More information

APPENDIX D - APPENDIX E - APPENDIX F - APPENDIX G - APPENDIX H

APPENDIX D - APPENDIX E - APPENDIX F - APPENDIX G - APPENDIX H Appendices APPENDIX A - CROSSING VOLUMES AND WAIT TIMES APPENDIX B - DOCUMENT REVIEW APPENDIX C - STUDY AREA AND MAJOR DESTINATIONS APPENDIX D - NETWORK CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT APPENDIX E - NETWORK AMENITIES

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Hamilton, 2011-Ohio-3835.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95720 STATE OF OHIO DEFENDANT-APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER

More information

Case 5:17-cv BRO-FFM Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case 5:17-cv BRO-FFM Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-00-bro-ffm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Michael B. Garfinkel, Bar No. 00 MGarfinkel@perkinscoie.com Tyler D. Anthony, Bar No. 0 TAnthony@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP Century Park

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 - v. : DATE FILED: July 7, 2010 ZACHARY YOUNG : VIOLATIONS: 21 U.S.C. 846 a/k/a Fatboy,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION. No. 3:13-CV-0755

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION. No. 3:13-CV-0755 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION REGGIE D. BLAIR, Plaintiff, vs. No. 3:13-CV-0755 DERRICK NELSON and GUARANTEED LOGISTICS, LLC and SOUTHEASTERN

More information

2016 PA Super 91. OPINION BY OTT, J.: Filed: April 28, Anthony Stilo appeals from the July 23, 2014, judgment of sentence

2016 PA Super 91. OPINION BY OTT, J.: Filed: April 28, Anthony Stilo appeals from the July 23, 2014, judgment of sentence 2016 PA Super 91 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ANTHONY STILO Appellant No. 2838 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence July 23, 2014 In the Court of Common

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Case :-cv-0-bhs Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JOSE SANCHEZ, ISMAEL RAMOS CONTRERAS, and ERNEST FRIMES, on behalf of themselves and all

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MARCUS TERRELL FISCHER DOB: 02/01/1999 3927 6TH ST N MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55412 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS COREY A. SCOTT, individually, DEMIR FISHER, individually, ARTIE MCFADDEN, a minor, by his next friend, JANETTE MCFADDEN, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 06CR4007

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 06CR4007 [Cite as State v. Watts, 2007-Ohio-2411.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 21982 vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 06CR4007 ASHANTA WATTS : (Criminal

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LADAYA DA SHAE MITCHELL No. 1356 WDA 2016 Appeal from the Order

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO TOBY ROSS 691 S. Elliston Trowbridge Rd Elmore, OH. 43416 and TAMRA ROSS 691 S. Elliston Trowbridge Rd Elmore, OH 43416 v. Plaintiffs, IBRAHIM BOATENG 324

More information

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Supreme Court of Louisiana Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 3 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 21st day of January, 2009, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2008-KK-1002

More information

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :23 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2018

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :23 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND ---------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO.: 151162/15 BRIAN HEALEY and ANN HEALEY, Plaintiffs, -against-

More information