5-7 March st African Diaspora Expert Meeting 5-7 March 2012 in Eschborn (Frankfurt am Main), Germany. Report

Transcription

1 Establishing a well-functioning Network 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting in Eschborn (Frankfurt am Main), Germany Report of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 1

2 Table of Content Table of Content... 2 Acknowledgements Background Objectives of the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meetings The proceeding of the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting Presentation of the Rules of engagement and e-consultation report The AEP Website presentation Network Building: Best Practices, Lessons Learnt and Challenges Encountered Establishing a well functioning Network Working Group I: Coordination and Communication Structure of the AEP Working Group 2: Defining the Objectives, Role and Responsibilities creating a Framework for Cooperation Training on Network and Alliance Building Conclusion Annexes Annex 9.1: Profiles and contacts of participants & staff Annex 9.2: Rules of Engagement Annex 9.3: Agenda of the 1 st Expert Meeting of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 2

3 Acronyms AB ACTD ADO ADPC AEP AFFORD AVP BMZ CASC CEMIS CGMD CONFESEN CSO ESAAG EADPD ESM EUNOMAD FASCP FORCE FORIM GAME GIZ ICMPD IDD MANSAG NEF SDC VKII angola-bridge.org Angola Center for Trade and Development Cooperation African Diaspora Organisation African Diaspora Policy Centre Africa Europe Platform African Foundation for Development Africa Vernetzungs-Plattform Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development Coordinadora d'associacions Senegaleses de Catalunya Centre d'études et de mémoire des migrations subsahariennes Coordination Générale des Migrants pour le Développement Confesercenti Senegal Civil Society Organisation Ethiopian Students and Alumni Association Germany European wide African Diaspora Platform for the Development of Africa Estifanos Samuel Media European Network on Migration and Development Fundo de Apoio Social de Caboverdianos em Portugal Confédération des organisations rurales pour un Cameroun économiques Forum des Organisations de Solidarité internationale issues des Migrations Groupe d Appui de la micro à la moyenne entreprise Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH International Centre for Migration Policy Development Immigration Développement Démocratie Medical Association of Nigerians Across Great Britain National Employment Fund Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation Cameroon Association of Engineers and Computer Scientists of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 3

4 Acknowledgements I wish to express my gratitude for the generous support by the European Commission, the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), for the realization of the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting held in Eschborn from March 5th to March 7th, Without their support, this unique and historic event would not have been possible. Especially the GIZ, which did not only host the Meeting but also supported us as well with the logistical arrangements, deserves my appreciation. I would also like to thank the African diaspora experts who accepted our invitation to participate in the conference. They shared with us their knowledge and practical experiences and identified key elements which contribute directly to the successful establishment of a European-wide African Diaspora Platform for Development. I am particularly grateful to my colleagues at the African Diaspora Policy Centre and our consortium partners, notably, the African Foundation for Development (AFFORD), the Forum des Organisations de Solidarité internationale issues des Migrations (FORIM), the Coordination Générale des Migrants pour le Développement (CGMD) and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) who worked around the clock and made the Expert Meeting a very successful endeavour. Dr. Awil Mohamoud Executive Director, African Diaspora Policy Centre EADPD project partners of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 4

5 1. Background The European-wide African Diaspora Platform for the Development of Africa (EADPD) is a project that aims to promote the important contribution of the African Diaspora to the development of Africa and to build a sustainable and strong network of African diaspora organisations from the 27 EU member states, Switzerland and Norway. This network was named the Africa Europe Platform (AEP). The three year EADPD project started on 1 st January 2011 and is implemented by five organisations, notably the African Diaspora Policy Centre (ADPC), the African Foundation for Development (AFFORD), the Coordination Générale des Migrants pour le Développement (CGMD), the Forum des Organisations de Solidarité internationale issues des Migrations (FORIM), and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD). For the establishment of the AEP a number of key activities have been identified. Among those are three African Diaspora Expert Meetings which provide a platform for African development practitioners, experts and opinion leaders of the 29 countries to reflect and discuss on the methods, structures and procedures of setting up the AEP. From 5 to 7 of March 2012 the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting took place in the GIZ premises in Eschborn, Germany and was fundamental for the framing and formation of the AEP. The aim of the meeting was to discuss and agree on the coordination and communication structure and to define the goals and objectives of the AEP. To this aim challenges and good practices of network building were addressed in panel discussions and reflected in working group sessions. African diaspora experts from 25 EU Member States plus Switzerland as well as government and civil society representatives from five African pilot countries 1 joined and actively contributed to the conference. EADPD KEY ACTIVITIES Mapping of African diaspora organisations (ADOs) in Europe Research on ADOs in the EU for a better understanding of Co-development Website building Training & Capacity building Publication of e-policy Briefs Networking (Expert meetings, meetings African Presentations on tools developed to facilitate the platform building process, panel discussions, keynote speeches, and workshops enabling the participants to express and exchange their views on the establishment of an African Diaspora platform, shaped the format of the conference. Plenary sessions, coffee breaks, meals and evenings became arenas for formal and informal exchange where advice, concerns and opinions on platform building were voiced. By inviting government and civil society representatives from the project s five pilot 1 The five pilot countries of the EADPD project are Angola (for Southern Africa), Cameroon (for Central Africa), Ethiopia (for East Africa), Morocco (for North Africa) and Senegal (for West Africa) of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 5

6 countries in Africa, namely, Angola, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Morocco and Senegal first steps were taken towards more efficient cooperation not only among diaspora organisations but also regarding the engagement of these organisations with their counterparts in Africa and vice versa. The service and capacity building aspects of the project were attended to via a training on networking, alliance building and policy engagement on the final day of the conference. 2. Objectives of the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meetings Facilitate networking between African Diaspora Experts from Europe Raise awareness among the participants on objectives of the EADPD project Create ownership among the participants of the network building process Establish links between governmental and CSO representatives of the five pilot countries and the African Diaspora Experts Discuss and agree on a coordination and communication structure and on a framework for cooperation Present, discuss and validate the Rules of Engagement, econsultation and AEP-website Deliver training on network and alliance building 3. The proceeding of the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting Peter Bonin (GIZ), Head of the Sector Migration and Development Awil Mohamoud (ADPC), Director & EADPD Project Coordinator of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 6

7 In the morning of 5 March 2012, the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting was officially opened by the hosting organisation GIZ and ADPC, the latter as representative of the consortium of implementing organisations of the EADPD project. Both highlighted the uniqueness of the initiative, emphasising the following points: for the first time the African diaspora in Europe came together to build a sustainable platform to foster its contribution to the development of Africa. Moreover, the building of strategic partnerships between the African Diaspora and the counterpart from the African continent was highlighted as well as the objectives of the project: learning from each other, joining forces and connecting the diaspora in Europe with the African countries of origin. The African diaspora should try to find common grounds on relevant issues in order to feed into the policy debate as well as request donor and government support coherently. The platform supports this process and provides a visible contact point to European policy and decision makers. As part of the development circle, e.g. through the transfer of remittances, the African diaspora should be included in mainstreamed development processes and able to execute its influence. Through a platform, African diaspora organisations can strengthen their network, link up with other actors and join forces. In sum, lobby and advocacy are needed and a platform is an appropriate tool to achieve this. The aim is that this platform becomes a leading actor for development. 1 st Expert Meeting Audience 1 st day After this opening the topic of Diaspora Engagement for Development was presented in an inspiring and informative keynote speech by Malin Frankenhaeuser, ICMPD. It was emphasised that governments of origin and destination countries began to recognise the potential of development contributions of migrants and developed policies to encourage migrants involvement in the development of their home countries only recently. Technology and transport make it possible for migrants to be involved here and there, including increasingly in trade and investment, entrepreneurship, tourism, education, sport and culture. During the presentation, the diaspora was encouraged to always be firm regarding their right to be involved, heard and Malin Frankenhaeuser (ICMPD), Keynote speaker of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 7

8 understood as an actor and active participant in the development process of the countries of origin. Most positive development contributions by migrants occur at the individual level, independently or irrespectively of government interference or development strategies. But just as governments should continuously try to understand and meet their diasporas halfway, the diasporas should seek to do so. The limited capacity of state structures was mentioned as a major constraint engaging the diaspora in longer-term development planning. If governments develop strong policies and partnerships, preferably with assistance from the diaspora, the diaspora is enabled to implement and cultivate development for Africa. In that sense, the Platform may function as a tool to strengthen the Diaspora s capacity for engagement. 3.1 Presentation of the Rules of engagement and e-consultation report The afternoon session of the first day of the Expert Meeting was was introduced by Arthur Yenga (CGMD) who gave a presentation on The Rules of Engagement, and the AEP expert Dr. Erick Tambo (The Cameroon Associations of Engineers and Computer Scientists-) who presented his report on the 1 st e-consultation. Arthur Yenga (CGMD), EADPD Project Officer & Keynote speaker Erick Gankam Tambo ( VKII/UNU), e-consultant The Rules of Engagement of the EADPD have been agreed to: of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 8

9 Highlight the rules and objectives of the AEP Indicate the structure and work plan of the EADPD and the thematic and geographic clusters Explain the working methods of the AEP Clarify membership issues (rights and obligations, membership procedure, types of members) Define the Code of Conduct between the members of the AEP For more information, please consult the annex Rules of Engagement Arthur Yenga (CGMD) stated that in order to establish a well-functioning network, in addition to the consortium partners ADPC, AFFORD, FORIM, ICMPD and CGMD, other organisations have to be involved at an early stage of the platform building process. If many organisations and actors are involved, there has to be a minimum set of rules to follow. He further continues that agreeing on a set of principles helps to facilitate concrete cooperation, coordination and information exchanges between the stakeholders interested in the activities of this project and, hence, the Rules of Engagement guide the well-functioning of the AEP. The main objective of the 1 st e-consultation was to validate the Rules of Engagement as well as the thematic and geographic clusters of the EADPD project identified so far and to include them into the framing process of the Africa-Europe Platform. Next to the Rules of Engagement and the thematic and geographic clusters, the questions addressed the background of the African diaspora organisations interrogated and the activities they performed. The questionnaire consisted of 37 open and closed questions and was made available in English and French. 447 actors received the questionnaire; the response rate was 17,6% (78 responses; 51 complete and 25 partial responses). The main findings of the e-consultation highlighted by Dr. Erick Tambo in his presentation were the following: Almost all thematic clusters covered by the Platform were considered relevant 2, especially 2 The full list of thematic clusters : (1) rural & community development, (2) microfinance, (3) education, (4) health & social assistance, (5) diaspora and entrepreneurship business & investment, (6) democracy, peace participation of the diaspora in Europe, (7) lobbying, capacity building, (8) networking and collaboration with other African diaspora organisations, (9) diaspora & media, (10) brain drain migration/inclusion and (11) access to and distribution of water of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 9

10 education, networking and collaboration with other African diaspora organisations. Microfinance, democracy & peace, diaspora & media as well as access to and distribution of drinking water were categorized as being least significant. The countries selected as pilot countries for each region of Africa (Morocco - North, Senegal - West, Cameroon - Central, Angola - South and Ethiopia - East) were endorsed. Respondents were only in disagreement about the grounds on which Morocco was selected: due to their experience in Co-development. Audience of the 1 st Expert Meeting 1 st day The Rules of Engagement were largely accepted by all respondents. The objectives, procedures and working methods mentioned were appreciated. Opinions were however divided about the obligations and the Code of Conduct between the members of the Platform. Almost all (99%) of the respondents would like to be informed about and involved in the project in the future. A good basis for AEP is that collaboration with other African diaspora organisations was considered highly relevant by the respondents. Both, the Rules of Engagement and the report of the first e-consultation provided a basis for further discussions during the working group sessions (see chapter 5). For further information, please find the e-consultation report under: In French: In English: %20Report%20EN.pdf; of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 10

11 3.2 The AEP Website presentation The main communication and interaction tool used to establish the Africa-Europe Platform is the AEP website which caters to both English and French speakers. Estifanos Samuel and Esayas Gebremedhin presented and launched the interactive website during the second day of the Expert Meeting in Frankfurt. They were assisted by ADPC, the partner responsible for this project activity. Three principles form the basis of the website s structure: Estifanos Samuel (ESM), AEP-webside building company PROMOTE the strong contribution of the African Diasporain Europe to the development of Africa CONNECT INFORM people and organisations working in the development field in Europe and link them to their CSO and governmental partners in Africa the African diaspora in Europe and Co-development actors in Africa about who is actively engaged in the AEP and the development of Africa and about the Co-development policy in Europe Essentially there are three main areas to the site, (1) Home the landing page with several teasers connected to the other areas of the website, (2) Members the section for registration and, hence, becoming an AEP member, maintains users profiles and allows them to browse through other members profiles; and (3) AEP the Africa-Europe Platform section with all information on and output of the project itself. The AEP discussion forum which is accessible via the landing page, invites users to exchange and discuss about important and current matters. In addition the AEP website offers the option of signing up for the AEP e-newsletter, links to AEP social media sites and many others. One of the main features of the landing page is a rotating teaser which portrays registered members of the AEP randomly to raise their profile/ increase their visibility. In the Country Profiles section information on African diasporas in EU member states (plus Norway and Switzerland) will be displayed. In order to highlight the website building philosophy KISS (Keep It Simple and Save) and to demonstrate how easy it is to register and to create a profile, a participant registered live on stage and created of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 11

12 his own profile online. Pictures, videos and text documents could be used to create attractive and striking profiles to showcase activities and projects. A number of documents on development and the African diaspora, updates about proposals, the latest news about migration, and an event calendar are accessible on the website. It was suggested to add other languages such as Portuguese or Spanish to cater to further African diaspora groups. Technically, up to 10 languages can be installed on the website. However, current project funds limit the website s availability to the two most used languages of the African diaspora in Europe, English and French. In summary, the website received positive feedback and met the expectations of the audience. AEP-website Homepage AEP-website Event-Calendar of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 12

13 4. Network Building: Best Practices, Lessons Learnt and Challenges Encountered Three keynote speakers experienced in network building were invited to share their best practices and challenges encountered for the establishment of the Africa-Europe Platform: Brice Monnou (FORIM), Malick Diop (EUNOMAD European Network on Migration and Development) and Samuel Guane Ackah (DFD Diaspora Forum for Development). The speeches were followed by a short discussion moderated by Lukas Gehrke (ICMPD). The FORIM platform, created in 2002, regroups organisations engaged with countries that were colonised by France. Brice Monnou outlined that after the creation of the network, it took two years to make the network functional. First, migrants were identified and a dialogue From left: Samuel Ackah (DFD), Panellist; Lukas Gehrke (ICMPD) Moderator; Malick Diop (EUNOMAD/GAME), Panellist; Brice Monnou (FORIM), Panellist was established. Then, a referencing system was set up to define the profile of the members and the common objective. This platform was not supposed to detract from the activities of the member organisations that joined the platform but, instead, give added value and refresh existing initiatives. The main obstacles to the structured organisation of migrant groups in France were the lack of geographical proximity, insufficient organisation, and the simultaneous rise of competing platforms which made it difficult to decide which one they should join and engage with. Also, when migrants and public authorities decided to cooperate political issues remained. It was emphasised that it is important to take time to involve the migrants in the platform building process at the grass root level. A bottom-up approach is essential. A continuous dialogue with these and other stakeholders on how migrants can develop their home countries needs to be in place. Every individual member needs to feel empowered whereas a core group of people has to sustain the network and responsibilities have to be shared accordingly. A challenge migrant organisations are facing, is the negative perception of migrants in the North. This relates to another problem migrant groups encounter: Brice Mounnou (FORIM), Panellist of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 13

14 the lack of access to funds, especially from governments and bigger development organisations. Often, donors want to provide funds for activities they deem useful only. But Brice Monnou argued that the action plan needs to take into account the interests of the migrants and not mainly the interests of the donors. With a powerful final statement she concludes her speech. The keynote speech given by Malick Diop focused on his experiences with the EUNOMAD network. As the owner of a start-up business in Senegal the advantages of joining a network are visibility and aggregated strengths through joined forces. Thus, in order to create a support structure for his own business, with other Senegalese he created a network to support business creation. To further enhance support structures, this organisation took the decision to join the EUNOMAD network. EUNOMAD consists out of country platforms with national and regional organisations as members. In order to establish a well-functioning network, there is the need of a common topic attractive to all potential members. A platform should be based primarily on members participation. When the EUNOMAD network was looking for partners, there were predefined goals and partners were not integrated in the agenda-setting process. This caused obstacles to involving members at a later stage. Since it is the members who give life to the network, they need to be involved in the planning process. Malick Diop (EUNOMAD/GAME), Panellist It is beneficial for EUNOMAD that, issues are now addressed at the grassroots level and all members from the bottom to the top level are involved in collective decision-making. In order to respond to the needs and constrains outlined by members changes in the management of the platform took place. Thus Brice Monnou s final statement: Only by working together and as empowered actors, we can really progress. Malick Diop s advises for the network building process: - Collective decision making from the bottom to the top level - Intensive discussions at the grassroots level on network issues - Identification of common objectives at the earliest stage - Founding members should open the direction to other members the flexibility to adjust to members needs is indispensible for the creation of a sustainable platform. Diaspora Forum for Development (DFD) is a forum of 48 organisations from 32 different countries on 4 continents. Before DFD was established, a number of different diaspora groups brainstormed about a common identity. Different expectations, goals, backgrounds, ways of working and fragmentation posed challenges at the beginning. To overcome the challenges, a collective decision-making process as well as accountability and of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 14

15 transparency measures was put into place. Furthermore, effective communication mechanisms were set up and the purpose and goals of the platform clarified. Hence, a collective identity has been built and ownership of the activity ensured. Samuel Ackah further pointed out that the platform needs to listen directly to all stakeholders involved. If these rules are followed, the benefits of being a member of a network are manifold and include: information sharing, visibility and promotion, speaking with a stronger common voice, access to a Samuel Ackah (DFD), Panellist pool of experts, and saving costs by using a common network infrastructure. In this sense the AEP is an innovation for all African Communities in Europe. The sub- sequent discussion highlighted the importance of a constant dialogue between members, of making decisions and defining goals at the grassroots level and of facilitating empowered and active membership. Further challenges which will need to be addressed include the diversity of members, the establishment of good communication with governments from both Europe and Africa and definition of prerequisites for becoming a board member Other important points that have been discussed were how to define the concrete target groups of the AEP and ensure their active membership, how to create ownership among the members for the involvement in essential processes, how to ensure transparency and last but not least how to manage the diversity of African diasporas in a effective and constructive manner. 4.2 Networks of Diaspora Organisations in Europe benefits from platform membership The discussion was moderated by Lukas Gehrke, EADPD Project Coordinator from ICMPD. The panel consisted of Mohamoud Bellafkir from the German Moroccan Competence Network (DMK), Amadou Bocar Sam Senegalese associations in Catalonia (CASC), Erick Tambo (VKII), Eskinder Mamo - Ethiopian Students and Alumni Association in Germany (ESAAG) and António Frank (Angola Bridge.org) and the Angola Center for Trade and Development Cooperation of the Netherlands. Samuel Ackah s view on the Africa Europe Platform - The AEP is an innovation for African communities in Europe - All members should be empowered and active members - Visibility, sharing capacities and information as well as speaking with a common voice are the attracting reasons to join the AEP - It needs to be listened directly to all stakeholders - The diversity of the members is the biggest challenge for the AEP Panellists on stage (from left): Eskinder Mamo (ESAAG); Mohamoud Bellafkir (DMK), Lukas Gehrke (ICMPD), Moderator; Erick Tambo (VKII), Amadou Bocar Sam (CASC), António Franck (ACTD/AB) of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 15

16 The panel agreed that members benefit from each others experiences, are able to collaborate in setting up projects on a Pan-African level, broaden their scope of action, network and establish new contacts with academics (students as well as practitioners), share information, and can work on mechanisms increasing the mobility of the diaspora and their access to funds. Through the platform, the diaspora can build and function as a bridge between Africa and Europe and establish mechanisms to get Africans more involved in their host societies. From left: António Franck & Amadou Bocar Sam (Panellists) António Frank noted further that a tool is needed to better support Africans in becoming involved in political parties and other governmental institutions in order to be better involved in the system. Mohamoud Bellafkir summarized that interaction between Africans can lead to a level where we can benefit and not reinvent the wheel again and again. Why not look at existing networks and associations? Much can be achieved at the Pan- African level without passing through Europe. The audience further highlighted the problems arising from the African diaspora s differing levels of integration in different European countries. African diasporas in Lithuania, for example, have devoted themselves to issues such as non-discrimination and racism, a topic that is of much less relevance in France. In addition, the need for greater mobility (including persons and financial means) to facilitate knowledge transfer from (and to) the African Diaspora, the importance of addressing discrimination and integration issues and the formulation of statutes were highlighted. The perception is that an Africa-Europe platform has the potential to become a beacon of hope for greater intellectual exchange and a stronger contribution to development in Africa. 5. Testimonies from the Pilot Countries: Diaspora Engagement for Development In order to consolidate the links between African diaspora organisations in Europe and African governments and civil society organisations (CSO), governmental and CSO representatives of the five pilot countries 3 were invited to exchange ideas on the nexus of diaspora and development. In two panels focusing on the progress of 3 Morocco, Senegal, Cameroon, Ethiopia and Angola of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 16

17 (co-)development policies and the implementation of (co)-development projects, the role of, and the opportunities and challenges for the diaspora were discussed. a) Testimonies from African governmental representatives The first panel consisted of African government representatives in charge of diaspora policies and affairs. All panellists highlighted the rising awareness of their governments about the contribution of the diasporas to development. In all countries different approaches and programs have been established to maximise benefits and engagement and to minimise the challenges of cooperation with development practitioners form the diaspora. In the past thirteen years the Cameroon Unit of International Cooperation, together with the National Fund for Employment, have established a project that supports highly skilled Cameroonians to return to their country. More than 200 people have made use of this opportunity so far. Furthermore Cameroon signed an 1 st Expert meeting disussion panel of governmental representatives, from left: Tesfaye Wolde Hussen - Ethiopia, Amadou Lamine Faye - Senegal, Gibril Faal - AFFORD (Chairman and EADPD Project Coordinator) - Moderator, Rachida Aboumehdi - Morocco, José Ndziga Obama - Cameroon, Anónio Franck (Interpreter for João Fortuna Pessela - Angola) agreement with Germany within the framework of the PARIC programme 4 to facilitate return migration and job creation in Cameroon. In Germany about 64% of the African students are from Cameroon. Still sustainable structures have to be established and the working environment for diaspora returnees improved to attract more highly skilled Cameroon diaspora members to return. Angola has recently established the Institute of the Angolan Communities Abroad and Consulate Affairs which investigates the relevant aspects for Co-development engagement and return of Angolan diaspora members. In collaboration with IOM, the institute collects data on the terms under which the Angolan diaspora would be willing to return and to execute Co-development and business projects. The institute is working on a middle and long term strategy and the establishment of focal points for the diaspora, where they could apply their skills and participate actively in the development of Angola. 4 Within the programme, so far, 217 diaspora members (e.g. doctors, pharmacists, dentists, etc.) returned to Cameroon, 14 created their own businesses and one returnee established a business with 40 employees. Thanks to programme, technology transfer and knowledge transfer takes place. It is planned to sign contracts with more host countries. of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 17

18 The Moroccan government expressed its highly political intention to involve the diaspora in the development of Morocco. The close proximity to Europe is the reason why the Moroccan diaspora is one of the largest in Europe (more than 4,1 million people); representing an important asset for the economic development of Morocco. The Moroccan government has already established a global strategy for the inclusion of their diaspora in development planning. A web portal has been set up for Moroccans abroad and several geographic and thematic networks among Moroccans in, e.g., Germany, Canada, the U.S.A. and Belgium as well as networks among Moroccan doctors, lawyers, students, and other groups. So as to keep the 1 st Expert meeting discussion panel of governmental representatives, from left: José Nziga Obama Cameroon, João Fortuna Pessela Angola, Rachida Aboumehdi Morocco dialogue ongoing, events with diaspora communities are organised regularly. However, the need to setup operational partnerships between government institutions and diaspora organisations has been identified. In addition, the government s plans were mentioned to launch a website for Moroccans abroad to play their role as mediators, and to make it easier for the diaspora to participate in projects and to get in touch with other stakeholders. Morocco, similar to the Angolan government, is convinced that to be more effective, concrete development needs and demands have to be identified and matched with the skills of all development practitioners, including those from the diaspora, in a global strategy. The Moroccan Government also cooperates with other international actors such as GIZ to enhance their engagement with diaspora organisations in their country of residence 5. In Ethiopia and Senegal, voluntary return and circular migration programmes for migrants are implemented by signing bilateral agreements with countries of destination. In Ethiopia, diaspora policy issues are no longer only dealt with by the Ministry but as well by regional government departments. Furthermore, a Person of Ethiopian Origin Identity Card (PEOIC), also called a Yellow Card, was created. With this card, Ethiopians living abroad, without an Ethiopian passport, have the option of doing business in Ethiopia like a domestic investor, i.e. to own property, to open a bank account, and not needing need a visa or a work permit. Currently Ethiopia is formulating a diaspora policy linked to national development. The diaspora has been actively consulted to contribute to the conceptualisation of this policy. 5 Morocco and the GIZ are working together in programmes initiated by Germany s Moroccan Diaspora organisations like the German Moroccan Competence Centre of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 18

19 Other projects in e.g. Angola and Ethiopia focus on attracting migrants skills to promote brain gain as opposed to brain drain. Furthermore, investment opportunities for the diaspora and business programmes are sought to enhance the transfer of knowledge and technology. Like several African states, Senegal has acknowledged the importance of the diaspora to national development, by establishing a diaspora department at the ministerial level and an agency that supports the Senegalese diaspora to invest in their country of origin. A bilateral agreement has been established with Spain, allowing Senegalese to work in Spain for a limited time, especially in the agricultural sector,. Also, the Senegalese government has started a program of decentralisation to offer greater regional autonomy on regional and local Co-development projects, acknowledging the strong regional affiliations of Senegalese abroad. The audience responded positively to the presentations from the government representatives but, at the same time, raised several critical remarks. Despite initiatives such as the Yellow Card, diaspora members still feel as if they are treated more like foreigners than as nationals when returning to the country of origin. Many have to apply for a visa. Administrative barriers such as visa problems also hamper the effective implementation of migrant-led projects. Therefore, establishing dual citizenship agreements with host countries could bring benefits for (co-) development. Another option raised was an African passport facilitated by the African Union. The issue of mobility is crucial for the engagement and the return of migrants. Concerning voluntary return policies, it was remarked that people might not want to go back without having the chance to return to their host country, especially when projects or businesses fail. In addition, Diaspora practitioners are often not aware of the administrational procedures, business practices, or project implementation in target regions. Here the government has to play its role as facilitator of diaspora engagement by providing them with support agencies. It was concluded that it is indispensible for home countries to know their diaspora better and enable them to take part in the development of their countries of origin. Statements from pilot country governmental representatives - An engaged diaspora is a factor of success and an asset for development - Global strategies to include the diaspora have been established recently - Partnerships between governmental institutions and diaspora organisations on the operational level are required - Mobility is a crucial factor for an effective involvement of the diaspora - Return programs should be established jointly and focus on young migrants of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 19

20 b) Testimonies from African CSO representatives Many projects presented were financed by contributions from the diaspora and to some extent by European governments. Corruption, a lack of trust and discrimination remain a problem for the diaspora when raising funds. In some European countries African migrants have no visibility and are not recognised by government institutions. The recent financial crisis in Europe causes yet another obstacle for fundraising. Cooperation with other (diaspora) organisations and dialogue between migrants, local actors and other stakeholders should be tapped into to enhance collective knowledge-sharing. Migrants often bring innovative solutions to countries of origin and should be considered 1 st Expert meeting discussion panel of CSO representatives, from left: Jean Mbarga - Cameroon, Gibril Faal - AFFORD (Director and EADPD Project Coordinator) Moderator, Bara Mboup - Senegal, Youssef Haji - Morocco, Genet Loulseged Ethiopia as consultants for local development plans. While the diaspora is not responsible for, or in charge of, the failure of governmental policies, governments should listen to the diaspora and use their own resources to tackle grievances that migrants encounter. Better governance would allow for the coordination of projects and initiatives which are spread across the home countries, to involve young people more effectively, tackle youth unemployment and take gender issues better into account. To illustrate this matter, Youssef Haji stated Men talk a lot and women work. Furthermore, it was demanded that a focus was put on projects in rural areas, e.g. in the form of training for farmers. Diaspora support to rural entrepreneurship, support for small businesses and follow-up projects can significantly contribute to the development of rural areas. Regions with strongest immigration in the past now have the strongest growth because migrants invested in their regions of origin. Throughout the panel discussions, the opinion that migration has a positive Statements from pilot country CSO representatives - Diaspora Co-development organisations should support the agriculture sector and the rural development first - Women should play a bigger role due to their strong impact on development - Not lot governance is needed but good governance - The diaspora is the vehicle of innovative approaches and methodologies - Regions of origin of strong emigration in the past now have the strongest growth due to the contribution of the diaspora Panellists of 1 st Expert Meeting discussion with CSO representatives from Africa. From left: Dr. Bara Mboup - Senegal, Youssef Haji Morocco of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 20

21 effect on development received strong affirmations. 6. Establishing a well functioning Network In order to provide enough room for personal contributions, the platform framing process was discussed in two separate working groups. Working Group 1 dealt with the Coordination and Communication Structure of the AEP and Working Group 2 dealt with Creating a Framework for Cooperation: Defining the objectives, roles and responsibilities. Two working group sessions were organised for both working groups. The results of the working group sessions are summarized in the following paragraphs: 6.1 Working Group I: Coordination and Communication Structure of the AEP Working Group 1: Session 1 The first session aimed at identifying challenges and strengths obstacles as well as positive aspects to the establishment of AEP and how the building of a coordination and communication structure could overcome any weaknesses. In addition, a common understanding of the coordination and communication structure was to be reached through an intensive discussion of the following guiding questions: (1) How should this structure manage the diversity of the situation and working environment of African diaspora organisations in the different 29 countries? (2) How should the structure be set up supporting a democratic representation and active involvement of the African diaspora in 29 European countries in a sustainable and well functioning manner? (3) How could the required adaquate capacity for the well-functioning of the network be realised especially after project period ended? (4) Which concrete administrative structure should the AEP coordination and communication structure consist of (positions, bodies, committees, commissions, task forces)? (5) How (through which procedures) should this structure (periodic elections, nominations) be put in place to be representative? Firstly, at a very early stage of the discussion the lack of Portuguese language content in the project was challenged and identified as a major obstacle to involving the Lusophone African diaspora from Angola, Cap Verde, Guinea Bissau and Mozambique. Secondly, the diversity of the challenges and obstacles that African of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 21

22 diaspora organisations from different countries encounter was recognized as a key challenge for the platform building process. Participants from East European and South East European countries like Lithuania, Malta, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia pointed out that they are facing existential and essential challenges, such as weak structures at the national level, weak support of the host country s civil society and institutional discrimination. They do not benefit from supporting structures as do members of the African diaspora residing in countries like France, Germany or the UK. It was agreed to focus on this aspect of diversity more intensively during the workshop and take it into account on all levels of the network building process. Thirdly the lack of a media campaign concept to promote AEP was mentioned as well. Afterwards, workshop participants from different countries and organisations expressed their specific views of the role they want to play and the benefits they expect from a well-established AEP. Differing positions and opinions were detected in this intensive discussion. Some participants expected support from AEP for platform building on the national level, others regarding the topic of integration. With respect to the latter issue, other participants stated that this could not be part of the aims and the objectives of the AEP. At the end three clusters of expectations had been shaped. In line with the diversity aspect mentioned above, lobbying and advocacy on a national level as well as an exchange of best practice was requested from participants from EU Member States which do not, or have only recently involved and supported the African diaspora in (co-)development. Networking and influencing policy and decision makers and speaking with a stronger voice on the European level was expected from countries where the African diaspora is structured, supported and recognised as strong (co-)development actors. One of the main strengths of the platform is that it enhances the achievement of common objectives through unity and the combining of resources. Also, the pool of experts drawn from various backgrounds could enrich and drive the platform towards achieving higher goals. It could ignite a stronger lobbying impact and a common voice to address common issues. The platform could also ensure that it builds on reality, considering its demand-driven approach. Diversity among organisations means disagreeing to agree, which is enriching and builds common understanding. The platform offers a network, and the e-consultations and the establishment of a database can serve as tools to reach various groups and as a liaison that connects homelands and host countries. Having a single platform avoids the duplication of activities and proper orientation of available resources. The last aspect of this session concerned the identification of the tools capable of ensuring that the various components are coherent with the main structure and its sustainability. The Internet and electronic media were considered to be indispensible as time and cost-saving means of disseminating and sharing information, and creating awareness. Board meetings could be organised via Skype and other of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 22

23 multipliers across various cities and countries. Working Group 1: Session 2 Despite the prevailing diversity of opinions, members of this working group managed to achieve consensus on the issues identified during session and drafted the following picture of a structure plan: General Assembly - elected by the representatives - communicating, taking decisions, coordinating the structure (internal) - communicating, representing the AEP (external) Secretary/Office - performing the administrative work Representatives of the African Diaspora of country 1 electing & updating the GA Representatives of the African Diaspora of country 2 electing & updating the GA... Representatives of the African Diaspora of country 29 electing & updating the GA It was emphasised that the proper functioning and sustainability of the AEP depends on regular and adequate funding. This introduction inspired the other participants to draft the following recommendations: Transparency of information and communication is essential to create ownership among stakeholders An intensive diversity management of African diaspora organisations is fundamental for the well functioning of the AEP Democratic and equal representation of the diasporas in the 29 European countries is a key objective Building national platforms is essential for the effectivity of the AEP coordination and communication structure Introduction of Lusophone languages is fundamental to include important African diasporas Establishing regular face to face events and meetings during the implementation phase for the development of an associative culture of the AEP Focus on gender issues and women have to play am equal role in the decision making of the AEP The use of innovative media tools and PR (e.g. radio, TV, internet, social networks) are indespensible to disseminate messages and enhance the visibility of the AEP of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 23

24 Members also proposed the possibility of setting up structures centred either around clusters [Central Western Europe, Scandinavia and Eastern Europe] or around thematic areas. Existing networks would share good practices and experiences and serve as umbrella bodies for the new organisations. New organisations would join in as value was added to the Platform. Lessons could also be drawn from the structures of existing international institutions, such as the UN/EU for the purpose of decentralization or separation of powers Executive, Legislative and Judiciary, bound by constitution or Charter. The key observation of this working group was the diversity of presented ideas and participants. In an attempt to structure the different outcomes, the moderator established the following four different categories of diaspora organisations: Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Classical EU countries with outstanding historical relations with African countries, like Western European countries e.g. France, the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. The organisational level is strong and in most of the cases well established national platforms exist and could be used as connecting points. EU countries without intensive historical links with African countries but with a strong engagement of African migrants like Scandinavian countries, Austria and Switzerland. Regarding the organisational level national platforms are not established or are about to be built. African Diaspora organisations are benefitting from an intensive support for the networking and for Codevelopment projects. Eastern European Countries (Bulgaria, Hungary, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia) and South-East Mediterranean Europe (Malta, Cyprus, and Greece). Lacks in support of Co-development and networking from governmental institutions and the civil society. The African migrant organisations from these countries have developed own ways to perform projects without funding or are extremely creative in raising funds through other activities like organising cultural events or local campaigns. The networking level is in most of the cases weak and national umbrella organisations are not existing or not functioning. Portugal and Spain, both countries with historical links to Africa and a large African Diaspora. On some levels the governmental support of African diaspora organisations is weak or not existing. However, the African diaspora established strong umbrella organisations and created strategies for fundraising and getting the attention and the support of the civil society. At the end of the workshop a declaration of intent to participate actively in the building of the coordination and communication structure was expressed by the following experts: Andredina Cardoso Portugal Miriam Ekiudoko Hungary Samuel Ackah Netherlands Bonaventure Kagné Belgium Eskinder Mamo Germany Abdirizak Mohamed Finland Erick Yao Ireland of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 24

25 6.2 Working Group 2: Defining the Objectives, Role and Responsibilities creating a Framework for Cooperation Sarah Schlaeger - ICMPD, Rapporteur Workshop 2 Arthur Yenga - CGMD, Moderator Workshop 2 Arthur Yenga - CGMD and Sarah Schlaeger - ICMPD, EADPD-Project Officers, moderated the second working group. In the following the conclusions of the discussions of the first and the second day of the workshop have been summarised. A plethora of thoughts were collected regarding question number one, the role the AEP could play in improving the work of the African diaspora in their respective host countries. Capacity building through trainings particularly on fundraising, workshops which would provide room for sharing experiences and support to organisations during calls for tender were identified as the most relevant support mechanisms. It was further agreed that a website or any other form of external visibility tools would enhance the advocacy of migrants rights and defend migrants interests. In addition and besides creating an institutional memory, a website owned by the platform could render service to its members through sharing information on project implementation, informing members about issues of concern as well as supporting and engaging them in discussions. It was also highlighted that the participants understand themselves as actors and true stakeholders who want their voice to be heard on EU level. Therefore a strong information policy which promotes the role of the diaspora within Africa was said to be indispensible and should be achieved via the following three tools: education, training and research. The second question collected the main challenges diaspora organisations are confronted with when cooperating with other co-development actors such as civil society organisations, Diaspora organisations and government actors. A major finding related to an unsaid superiority emanating from international organisations and governments when cooperating with diaspora organisations. Lack of track records proving their capabilities of Foreign Affairs and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 25

26 bring about and reinforce the notion that members of the diaspora are not considered experts. Lack of coordination between diaspora actors and inconsistent access to information create additional handicap. In addition, the European civil society in migrants host countries generate unfair competition, leave migrant organisations alone during calls for tender and are perceived to think for rather than with the African diaspora. Also, host countries activities seem to be mainly geared towards short term goals and high visibility rather than building durable support structures. However, it is not only the other development actors who have to revisit their engagement strategies. A critical voice raised the issue that diaspora organisations have to learn to accept criticism and to give each other feedback. Concrete initiatives that could be addressed to support the diaspora were inquired with the third question. As in question one, empowerment via capacity building and enhancing the visibility of the African diaspora s work in Africa were strong components. A final statement highlighted that all stakeholders need to be included and participate in the endeavour to successfully enhance the development of Africa. Further relevant issues raised during debates were the following: Strict criteria on membership should be established to ensure that the network remains strong and coherent. No development can be successful without taking into consideration the migrants perspective. On the second day of working group sessions, the main focus was on the participants vision for the platform building process. How to engage members, ensure legitimacy, built a solid constitution and organisational structure were at stake. Clear definitions of rules, procedures, objectives, structures, functions and functionalities of administrative management were of major concern. It was agreed that the foundation should be laid through statutory documents such as an organisational Charta and a constitution. Communication, promotion of the platform and information sharing, so the proposal, need to be ensured via mailing lists, blogs and newsletters. It was further proposed that a delegate could be designated to report back from international and national meetings which are to be highlighted in a common meeting calendar. The legitimacy of the platform should be safeguarded via e-consultations which have to be conducted in a way ensuring the equal representation of all five geographic clusters. In addition, a steering group responsible for guiding the process and defining deadlines needs to be put into place. Equality as a basis for platform building 26

27 was also discussed; groups prone to be excluded need to receive special attention such as women and the youth. A further point made was the requirement to create sustainability. A strategy for long term funding would be required; it should go hand in hand with the promotion of the project on a larger scale which would also include international organisations and governments. The work of the EADPD project team was greatly appreciated by working group 2 participants. The tools provided so far and until the end of the project will establish a solid basis for the future work of the platform. 7. Training on Network and Alliance Building On the last day of the 1 st Expert Meeting the training on network and alliance building took place. The training was delivered by Gibril Faal, chairman of AFFORD and EADPD Project Coordinator, and taught as three Master Classes. In order to reach a wider audience, e-learning modules and corresponding master classes will be provided on the AEP website. The three classes taught focused on networking, alliancebuilding and policy engagement and advocacy. Merging innovative and interactive with traditional training methodologies, he ensured active and dynamic participation in the training sessions. Gibril Faal-AFFORD, Instructor of the training on Network and Alliance Building Training material was distributed in English and French and for each one of the three Master Classes working definitions were defined. The structure of the training was the following : 27

28 a. General training topics and expected overall outcome II. Alliance-Building I. Networking III. Policy Engagement and Advocacy b. Themes and content Enhanced capacities of African diaspora organisations working in developmentrelated activities Networking Structure of Development Networks Opportunities and Challenges of Networks Elements of Successful Networks Networking for Diaspora Development Alliance-Building Understanding the Nature and Stages of Partnership Understanding Negotiation and Brokering Challenges and Opportunities of Alliances Elements of Successful Alliances Alliance-Building for Diaspora Development Policy Engagement and Advocacy Definitions and key Components of Policy Advocacy and Influencing Understanding the Policy Community Policy Processes in Democratic and Non-Democratic Countries Conventional and Non-Conventional Advocacy Techniques Framework for Planning and Undertaking Policy Engagement 28

29 c. Training features and approaches Presentation and discussion on traditional, current and emerging concepts and definitions Presentation and explanation of analytical, observational and factual information Illustrations through examples, scenarios and case studies Presentation of aide-memoires, quizzes and questions to aid revision and reinforce learning Teaching of generic skills to enhance the technical competencies of participants Linking generic skills and best practices specifically to African diaspora development The working method was very interactive. Participants discussed questions posed by the trainer together and were able to raise their personal comments and concerns. The experts were encouraged to translate the knowledge acquired into practice in their daily work and encourage other members of the African diaspora to take part in the e-learning modules on the AEP website. Participants of the 1 st Expert Meeting s Training on Network and Alliance Building 29

30 8. Conclusion The EADPD Roadmap After a two-day session filled with speeches, panel discussions, experience-sharing, presentations and workshops, Dr. James Nwabineli of the Nigerian Association of Medical Doctors based in the UK, was called upon to propose, with the assistance of Rahime Diallo (ADPC), a strategy for the road ahead. He linked the platform-building-process to an empty building-site from which a gigantic building would emerge as soon as the proper foundation is laid. He proposed a roadmap compatible with the overall ideas which arose during the Meeting: Moderators of the closing session(from left): Dr. James Nwabineli (MANSAG), Rahime Diallo (ADPC) 1) A steering committee made up of experts should meet to further work out the ideas raised during this Expert Meeting. This entails the adjustment and expanding of the Rules of Engagement. 2) The outcome of this meeting should be circulated in the form of a Statute or Draft Constitution for comments and feedbacks from African diaspora experts. 3) A second steering committee meeting should be planned to amend the initial proposal in line with the comments received and draft a final document drafted. 4) The second Expert Meeting in November can be used to debate and adopt the document. This should signal the birth and the establishment of the EADPD platform. 5) The rest of the project period should be dedicated to the implementation and follow-up of all activities. It should aim at putting into practice the decisions made and a coherent management structure which is strong enough to carry on the AEP after the official project ends in December ) A smooth hand over of the African Europe Platform from the EADPD implementing organisations into the hand of the African Diaspora Europe, with the establishment of a communication and coordination structure until the end of the project period is the overall goal of the road map. 30

31 Outcomes Several outcomes were achieved during the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting. Judging from the interactions of participants, Day 1 was characterised by presentations, questions and discussions some of which expressed African migrants frustrations especially in Central and Eastern Europe but created as well a deeper awareness and a better understanding of the difficulties African diaspora organisations are facing in different European countries. According to the diversity of African diasporas in European countries represented by the experts, an intensive effort has been undertaken to find the same groove and understanding of structure building. By contrast, Day 2 saw a drastic change in approach as the same members instead of posing questions were contributing and interacting with constructive ideas and solutions on how to build a coherent and sustainable AEP platform. The experts, workshops, and the interpreters supported this process by helping participants to stay focused. Another positive aspect was the declaration of intend of several experts to participate actively in and contribute to the building of the coordination and communication structure of the AEP. In a nutshell, participants who came to Frankfurt with doubts about this project returned home with confidence in the AEP project and expressed their commitment to the Platform. Additionally, the launching and positive acknowledgement of the AEP website was a successful step forward. Henceforth, AEP should be further promoted on a larger scale. The networking has kicked off and participants were encouraged to register as AEP member on the website and also to continuously update their profiles. The strong and active participation of the representatives from the 5 pilot countries highlighted the importance of the African diaspora in Europe as a partner, as a facilitator and as a competent actor for the development of Africa. Relationships between the diaspora members and the pilot country representatives have been established through lively exchanges and networking. Another important outcome was the common understanding of the process and progress of the AEP as a project. The smooth handover of the platform at the end of the project period into the hands of the African diaspora of Europe has been concerted. Therefore a strong and sustainable structure has to be put in place by the implementing consortium, with the creative and active contribution and support of African diaspora organisations of the 29 countries. 31

32 Finally, a roadmap was sketched out and with a view to elaborating it in further detail over time. Many concrete solutions for issues such as the legal status and the membership of AEP, long term fundraising, and especially the contribution of women and youth were suggested by the participants. These all need to be further specified and eventually implemented. The two other Expert Meetings planned for the end of this year and next year will further support the establishment of a solid and sustainable Africa-Europe Platform. If we are strong in Europe, our ability to develop Africa grows. Dr. Gibril Faal s statement summarised both the rationale for platform building and the need to strengthen this process in the future. To this end and with the involvement of the diaspora actors present, the constitution of the platform will be developed in the coming months. Participants of the 1 st African Diaspora Expert Meeting 32

33 9. Annexes Annex 9.1: Profiles and contacts of participants & staff Rachida Aboumehdi Ministère chargé Pilot country de la Communauté Marocaine Morocco Government à l'etranger representative Rebecca Adelaine ICMPD Austria Staff Samuel Ackah Keynote Speaker Diaspora Forum for Development (DFD) Dutch Network of Migrant organisations Netherlands Mohamed Bellafkir German Moroccan Competence Network (DMK) Germany 33

34 Peter Bonin GIZ Gesellschaft für internationale Hosting & donor Zusammenarbeit, Head of the Sector Germany organisation Migration and Development Sayon Camara Slovakia FASCP - Fundo de Andredina Gomes Cardoso Apoio Social de Caboverdianos Portugal andredina.cardoso@gmail.com em Portugal Associació per la Cooperació, la Amadou Bocar Sam Daff Inserció Social i la Intercultaritat (ACISI), Senegalese Spain sam@acisi.org; abocarsam@yahoo.es associations in Catalonia (CASC) Yera Dembele Staff EADPD Project Coordinator/ Officer FORIM France yera@fafrad.org 34

35 GIZ Gesellschaft Stephanie Deubler für internationale Zusammenarbeit, Hosting & donor organisation Project Officer of the Sector Migration and Germany Development Abdou Rahime Diallo Staff ADPC The Netherlands EADPD Project Officer Aissatou Diallo Insanola Sweden Alioune Diop Staff EADPD Project Officer CGMD Belgium Malick Diop EUNOMAD / GAME France iem_asso@yahoo.fr Keynote Speaker 35

36 Mamadou Diouf Afryka INACZE'J Poland m.dioufafryka.org Franck Dossa Staff EADPD Project AFFORD United Kingdom Officer German-Ethiopian Victoria Endeshaw Student Association and Academicals Germany Forum (ESAAG) Ebony African Miriam Ekiudoko Cultural, Arts and Human Rights Hungary Organisation 36

37 Gibril Faal Staff EADPD Project AFFORD United Kingdom Coordinator Amadou Lamine Faye Consultant of the Pilot country Government African Diaspora Ministry of Senegal Senegal representative Angola Bridge.org, António Frank Angola Center for Trade and Development The Netherlands Cooperation Malin Frankenhaeuser ICMPD Austria Keynote Speaker 37

38 Esayas Gebremedhin Estifanos Samuel Media (ESM) Germany AEP Web designer Lukas Gehrke Staff EADPD Project Coordinator ICMPD Austria Youssef Haji Immigration Pilot country CSO representative Développement Démocratie (IDD) Morocco Tesfaye Wolde Hussen Pilot country Government Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ethiopian Expatriate Affairs - Directorate General Addis Abeba Ethiopia tesam22@yahoo.com representative 38

39 Raul João Angolan-Estonian friendship society Estonia Centre d'études et Bonaventure Kagné de mémoire des migrations subsahariennes Belgium (CEMIS) President of the Madisi Kasongo Administration Council, ACTION Greece CONGO HELLAS Migrants' Ali Konaté Network for Malta Equality 39

40 Chantal Lacroix ICMPD Staff EADPD Program Belgium EADPD Program Manager Manager Monique van Lancker Staff EADPD Project Officer FORIM France Prince Totoro Kulimishi Lomeka Association of Recognised Refugees Cyprus Genet Loulseged New Life Pilot country CSO Community Ethiopia representative Organisation (Ethiopia) 40

41 German- Ethiopian Eskinder Mamo Student Association and Germany Academicals Forum (ESAAG) Jean Mbarga Confédération des organisations Pilot country CSO representative (Cameroon) rurales pour un Cameroun économiques (FORCE) Cameroon Dr. Bara Mboup Diaspora Pilot country CSO representative (Senegal) Développement Migration (DIADEM) Senegal Abdirizak Hassan Mohamed Finnish Somalia Network Finland Saido Mohamed Finish Somalia Network Finland 41

42 Dr. Awil Mohamoud Staff ADPC The Netherlands EADPD Project Coordinator Binouri Brice Monnou FORIM France Keynote Speaker Awa N'Diaye Espace Afrique International Switzerland José Ndziga Obama International African Pilot country Government Cooperation Cell, National Employment Cameroon representative Fund (NEF) (Cameroon) Alexis Neuberg Africa Vernetzungs- Plattform (AVP) Austria 42

43 Lithuanian Chijioke Nkemka African Lithuania Community Medical James Nwabineli Association of Nigerians Across Great Britain United Kingdom (MANSAG) Guénolé Oudrey FORIM France João Fortuna Institute of the Pessela Angolan Communities Pilot country Abroad and Angola Government Consulate Affairs representative - Ministry of (Angola) Foreign Affairs Estifanos Samuel AEP web designer Estifanos Samuel Media (ESM) Germany e.samuel@esm-online.com 43

44 Sarah Schlaeger Staff EADPD Project Officer ICMPD Belgium Albert Suh Staff ADPC The Netherlands ADPC Researcher Oumar Syll CONFESEN Italy Verband Dr. Erick Tambo Kamerunischer Ingenieure und Germany econsultant Informatiker (VKII) Good Will Derick Louis Sevidzem Tatah Initiative Cameroonians Online Forum Denmark Scandinavia 44

45 Eyachew Tefera Institute for African Studies, Slovenia Slovenia m Sara Vennekate Staff EADPD Knowledge ADPC The Netherlands Management Officer Nora Witt Hosting & Donor Organisation GIZ Germany Bisrat Melaku Wolde Radio Afrika Austria Eric Yao Africa Centre Ireland eric@africacentre.ie 45

46 Arthur Yenga Staff EADPD Project Officer CGMD Belgium Stephane Ndjomo Youkep ACSAL Luxembourg Anina Zahn Swiss Agency for Donor Development and Corporation Switzerland Organisation (SDC) 46