DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Following are descriptions of the identified domestic violence issues in Dallas County. DV Intro 1

Transcription

1 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Following are descriptions of the identified domestic violence issues in Dallas County. DV Intro 1

2 Domestic Violence Community Plan Focus Group Participant List FY 2005 Grant Cycle Chairpersons Paige Flink The Family Place Jennifer Morrison New Beginning Center Jana Barker Brighter Tomorrows Bill Bernstein Mosaic Counseling Center Diane Bomash Injury Prevention Center Steve Brass Analysts International Alicia Cassity The Family Place Rozalyn Chaffin Cedar Hill Police Department Celestina Contreras Legal Aid of North West Texas Christina Coultas Dallas County District Attorney s Office Danielle Cruz City of Dallas Attorney s Office Kevin Curry Challenges of Tomorrow Eduardo Davila Dallas County CSCD Anne Dinh Mosaic Counseling Center Mary Dougherty Dallas County District Attorney s Office Cindy Dyer Dallas County District Attorney s Office Lynnette Engelbert The Salvation Army Freddie Fain Brighter Tomorrows Paige Flink The Family Place DV 1

3 Ona Foster Dallas County District Attorney s Office Carol Garza New Beginning Center Roy Getting Fathers For Equal Rights Sonyia Hartwell New Beginning Center Abhi Kang The Family Place Jeannette LaFontaine Irving Police Department Tania Loehucker Dallas County District Attorney s Office Jenna Lanoue Dallas County District Attorney s Office Norma Montes The Family Place Edie Hernandez Putt The Family Place Bob Regan Fathers For Equal Rights Lekeisa Rockwell Dallas County CSCD Donald Smith, Jr. Parkland Health and Hospital System Martha Stowe Injury Prevention Center Max Worrell Legal Aid of North West Texas Tyler Wright Dallas County District Attorney s Office NOTE: This list was compiled using focus group sign-in sheets from meetings held in Jennifer Morrison New Beginning Center Sharon Obregon The Family Place Lois Olson Children First Andrea Perez Dallas Police Department DV 2

4 TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? When victims of family violence do not have access to transitional housing programs, they may feel forced to remain in violent relationships or find themselves homeless, exposing themselves and their children to further danger. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Domestic violence is a major contributor to homelessness in Dallas County. With domestic violence incidents on the rise, women and children fleeing abuse often find themselves homeless and unprepared for self-sufficiency. The Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance points out that women and children who are homeless due to domestic violence are in immediate danger from their abusers and have unique emotional and safety needs that must be addressed by specialized residential programs. Family violence shelter clients leave thirty-day shelters with the uncertainty of where they will live because they lack financial resources and are not prepared to find affordable housing, resulting in homelessness or a return to the abusive situation. Dallas County offers only two transitional housing programs providing a total of fifty (50) units to meet the overwhelming statistics for family violence and to support the number of families exiting shelters in Dallas County. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County needs to increase the number of transitional housing programs for victims of family violence. Impact for Dallas County If there were increased opportunities for victims to enter transitional housing programs, families could anticipate increased self-sufficiency allowing them to obtain employment which would ultimately make permanent housing affordable. They would also be in environments that could offer the unique opportunities for emotional healing from the violence, thus increasing the stability of the family, and would be provided the safety that is needed to help protect them from further abuse. This opportunity would also decrease the chance that victims would return to the abuse or find themselves living in homeless shelters or on the street. Providing more options for victims of violence would enable them to make decisions to leave life-threatening situations where they remain because they fear they cannot afford to live independently. SUPPORTING STATISTICS The January 2003 homeless census survey reported that as of January 21, 2003, there were 5,181 homeless in Dallas County. Of these, 1,348 were women, 1,096 were children, and 2,737 were adult males. This census survey also cited family violence as the #4 response out of a possible 31 reasons why people were homeless 1. DV 1-1

5 According to the Texas Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Report, Dallas County reported 28,839 family violence incidents in 2001, 27,901 incidents in 2000, and 28,579 in There are currently two transitional housing programs in Dallas County for victims of family violence for a total of forty-three (43) units to support the increase in domestic violence incidents in the county and to offer options for families who occupy the 331 shelter beds at any given time. According to the Department of Housing, the average low-income 2-bedroom/2-bath apartment runs approximately $550 per month. The waiting list for Section 8 in Dallas County is approximately 18 months. The average income for a victim of domestic violence fleeing abuse is less than $10,000 per year. The 2002 Community Focus Group Survey cited transitional housing as one of the top five maintenance needs in Dallas County by victims, non-victims, and service providers 3. DATA United Way Needs Assessment 2003, Howard Friedma4 1 33,500 32,500 UNEMPLOYMENT & FAMILY VIOLENCE DALLAS COUNTY Family Violence Incidents Unemployment Rate 5.8% 5.3% Number of Incidents 31,500 30,500 29, % 4.3% Unemployment Rate 28, % 27, % DV 1-2

6 Trends in Family Violence Incidents 5 29,000 28,800 28,600 28,400 28,200 28,000 27,800 27,600 27, Family Violence Incidents for Dallas County CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Domestic Violence Transitional Housing Programs The Family Place Supportive Living Program (32 units) Genesis Transitional Housing Program (18 units) The length of stay for both of these programs is 18 months General Transitional Housing Programs Housing Crisis Center Exodus Oasis Reconciliation Outreach *There are only two programs in Dallas County located in zip codes and Additional units could be scattered sites in the future; therefore a map is not included. GAPS IN CURRENT SERVICE DELIVERY According to the Dallas, Texas 2002 Continuum of Care Application, Dallas County has a 240- unit gap in transitional housing units 6. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal for transitional housing for victims of family violence in Dallas County is to increase the current capacity by twenty (20) units, which would promote self-sufficiency for victims who may otherwise be forced to return to the violence. DV 1-3

7 Budget Information: The cost of providing transitional housing for a family per year is $20,000. This includes the apartment and support services. EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES The goal for transitional housing for victims of family violence in Dallas County is to increase the current capacity by twenty (20) units, which would promote self-sufficiency for victims who may otherwise be forced to return to the violence. Outcome #1 Objective: Increase the current capacity by twenty (20) units in Dallas County. Measurement: Monitor the additional units acquired each year. REFERENCES 1. Dallas County Homeless Census Survey, January 1, Texas Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Report, Dallas County Community Focus Group Survey, United Way Needs Assessment, Howard Friedman, Texas Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Report, Dallas County Continuum of Care Application, 2002 DV 1-4

8 SUPPORT GROUPS PROBLEM What is the problem Dallas County? Group counseling via support groups provides an understanding of how physical and sexual violence has impacted their lives and helps breaks the isolation barrier so victims do not feel alone. Without this counseling victims are more likely to return to the batterer and are less likely to gain a sense of control over their lives. Without counseling children are far more likely to experience problems in later years. Lacking treatment, these children are at a significant risk for delinquency, substance abuse, school dropout, and difficulties in their own relationships. 1 The process of breaking the silence and speaking openly about the violent events serves to reduce the sense of isolation and allows them to begin the emotionally healing process. The ultimate goal is to break the abuse cycle through education. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Domestic violence victims are far more likely to become homeless (Dallas Homeless Survey Summary, 2002) than those not involved in domestic violence. Family violence costs the nation from $5 to $10 billion annually. 2 Domestic violence has a myriad of tentacles that may result in homelessness, school problems, incarceration, decline in mental and physical health, a drain on welfare programs, and murder-suicides. What needs to be done to alleviate the problem? Many adult and child victims of domestic and sexual violence in Dallas County do not require emergency shelter services, but do need support group intervention to address the impact of the violence. According to the survey conducted by the domestic violence task force of Dallas County in 2002, support groups were listed as number three in the top five things that can be done to prevent domestic violence in Dallas County. 8 Impact for Dallas County If more support groups were available, victims would be able to learn about the dynamics of domestic and sexual violence and break the cycle of abuse. It would also be beneficial for children to have a better understanding of the cycle so that it doesn t continue for generations. Due to the growth of Spanish-speaking clients in the county, it is a necessity to increase the number of Spanish support groups for both adults and children. SUPPORTING STATISTICS The difference between the child and the adult victim is that the adult is, at least to some extent, a fully developed person who is physically equipped to take care of their own basic survival needs. The adult has the tools of language and reason available for the purpose of making sense of a difficult experience and for meeting emotional needs through connecting with, and asking for, support from others. Adult victims of domestic, as a rule, are well aware of their DV 2-1

9 need to talk out these issues with either trained counselors or in support groups with others who have similar experiences. During calendar year 2001, the Texas Department of Public Safety reported 180,385 reported incidents of family violence. Dallas area emergency shelters currently provide 27 English support group meetings per week and seven Spanish sessions. There is a dramatic need for additional group sessions especially for the Spanish-speaking client. The addition of nine (two English and seven Spanish) adult support groups, would help alleviate the large number of adults clients whose group support needs are not being met. Although many children in shelters have not been physically or sexually abused they have either witnessed or are aware of the abuse. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services points out; children don t have to have scars to be victims of conjugal violence. Simply being expose as a witness watching it, hearing it, or seeing the aftermath can have devastating longterm consequences for children. 3 Witnessing domestic violence has a consistently negative impact on children s emotional, social, and cognitive development. 4 Studies of physical and sexual violence in the lives of children suggest that this form of violence can be viewed as a serious public health problem. 5 Early intervention for children affected by domestic or sexual violence is critical. Children who witness traumatic events often feel helpless and see the world has unpredictable, hostile, and threatening. Overall, data indicate that children who live in households affected by domestic violence may suffer extensively and run the risk of developing a host of short- and long-term problems. Early intervention and treatment is critical for children. According to Dr. Osofsky, the most important protective resource to enable a child to cope with exposure to violence is a strong relations with a competent, caring, positive adult. 6 Dr. Osofsky goes on to state this adult may be a parent, grandparent, relative, trusted friend, psychologist, or health care worker. Given the negative repercussions of children s exposure to domestic violence, there exists a need for programs that can intervene in these children s lives to improve their potential for healthy psychological adjustment. 7 DATA CHARTS Adult Support Groups Per Week Brighter Tomorrows Genesis Salvation Army Family Place New Beginnings Spanish English Source: Telephone interviews, April DV 2-2

10 Child Support Groups Per Week Brighter Tomorrow s Genesis Salvation army Family Place New Beginning Spanish English Source: Telephone Interviews, April CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS English adult support group meetings are offered by all of the agencies. Three agencies (one in Garland and two in central Dallas area) offer support group sessions in Spanish. Adult English/Spanish Support Groups Stars represent shelters with adult support groups: English/Spanish offered by Family Place and Genesis represented by Dallas star. Salvation Army also represented by Dallas star offers English only. New Beginnings represented by Garland star offers English and Spanish. Brighter Tomorrows represented by star in Irving and Cedar Hill offers English. Source: MapQuest.com May DV 2-3

11 Child English/Spanish Support Groups Stars represent shelters with child support groups: English/Spanish offered by Family Place represented by Dallas star. Salvation Army and Genesis also represented by Dallas star offer English only. New Beginning represented by Garland star and offers English only. Source: MapQuest.com, May GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY The two most critical gaps exist in the lack of adequate child support groups and Spanish adult support groups. This gap can be partially filled by the addition of twenty (20) child and nine (9) adult support groups. Of the twenty-nine support groups requested, 75% would be for the Spanish-speaking clients. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal of the support groups is to provide a safe, stable, and nurturing environment for discussion of their unique issues and experiences. The process of breaking the silence and speaking openly about the violent events serves to reduce the sense of isolation and allows them to begin the emotionally healing process. The ultimate goal is to break the abuse cycle through additional education and counseling. An estimated budget for the County to provide approximately nine more adult support groups and 20 more children s groups is $250,650. This estimated cost covers the addition of a fulltime qualified counselor at each of the six organizations: Brighter Tomorrows, Mosaic, The Family Place, Genesis, New Beginnings, and Salvation Army. The estimate includes salary, benefits, play therapy supplies, attendance fees, and travel expenses for one annual Domestic Violence seminar/training per counselor. EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES The goal is to break the abuse cycle through additional education and counseling. DV 2-4

12 Outcome #1 Objective: Increase the number of support groups being offered in Dallas County. Measurement: Monitor the yearly increase of support groups being offered as we as, increase the number of participants receiving the assistance. Outcome #2 Objective: Increase the educational outreach efforts regarding the ramifications of Domestic Violence. Measurement: Monitor yearly increase of outreach materials being developed and distributed. REFERENCES 1. Graham-Bermann, S. Preventing domestic violence. University of Michigan research information index, (1994) 2. Medical News, American Medical Association. January, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. THE SPOTLIGHT. Volume 3, Issue 4, Quarter IV, Dell, S. Action Plan Update Addressing Youth Victimization. (October, 2001) 5. Regier, D.A., & Cowdry, R.W., Research on violence and traumatic stress (Program announcement, PA ). National Institute of Mental Health. (1996) 6. Osofsky, J. The Future of Children - The Impact of Violence on Children. Vol. 9. No 3 Winter Groves, B. Mental Health Services for Children Who Witness Domestic Violence. April Telephone interviews with Domestic Violence Shelter Executive Directors, April Telephone interviews with Domestic Violence Shelter Executive Directors, April MapQuest.com, May MapQuest.com, May 2003 DV 2-5

13 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTERS PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? Dallas County receives approximately 30,000 reports of domestic violence each year but only has 331 domestic violence shelter beds. The numbers of women and children living on the streets due to domestic violence in the home is astounding. Without access to emergency shelters, victims of family violence and their children would not have the resources for immediate safety and intervention. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Shelters are the primary life-saving resource for victims fleeing violence. Without adequate shelter resources, victims would face continued life-threatening violence or homelessness. Currently, existing shelters are struggling to meet budgetary demands to maintain the current level of services and are faced with economic uncertainty and rising costs as well as increased family violence incidents in the county. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County family violence shelters need the resources to maintain their current facilities and personnel, and to meet the rising costs associated with these services. Impact for Dallas County Shelters in Dallas County will continue to provide life-saving interventions at the current level ensuring protection for women and children and providing shelter. SUPPORTING STATISTICS According to the Texas Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Report, Dallas County reported 28,839 family violence incidents in 2001; 27,901 incidents in 2000 and 28,579 in The population in Dallas County being supported by 331 domestic violence shelter beds is 2,218,899 according to the 2000 Census 2. In addition, according to the January 21, 2003 Homeless Survey in Dallas County, a population of 5,181, of which 1,348 are women, 1,096 are children, and 2,737 are adult males are living on the streets. This survey reported that the #4 response out of a possible 31 reasons for homelessness among this population was family violence 3. To further support the need for shelter, the 2002 Community Focus Group Survey in Dallas County revealed that the need for shelter was an intervention priority according to agency, nonvictim, and victim responses 4. DV 3-1

14 DATA CHARTS Trends in Family Violence Incidents 29,000 28,800 28,600 28,400 28,200 28,000 27,800 27,600 27, Family Violence Incidents for Dallas County Family Violence Victims Served in Dallas County, 2002 Source: The Family Place United Way presentation DV 3-2

15 Dallas County currently has a total of 331 beds for victims of domestic violence. There are eight (8) family violence shelters including: Genesis Women s Shelter The Family Place Shelter New Beginning Shelter Salvation Army Brighter Tomorrows Grand Prairie Brighter Tomorrows Irving Brighter Tomorrows Greater SW Shelter Mosaic Shelter Non-family shelters include: Dallas Life Foundation Austin Street Shelter Union Gospel Mission Salvation Army Ruff House TFP NBC NBC TFP TFP BT SA GWS BT TFP GSW TFP TFP BT TFP The Family Place BT Brighter Tomorrows SA Salvation Army NBC New Beginning Center GWS Genesis Women s Shelter DV 3-3

16 GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Dallas County must continue to operate and maintain the shelter resources available at the current level. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal for emergency shelters in Dallas County is to maintain their current level of service. These services include: protecting victims of family violence in Dallas County from further harm by providing a safe haven available 24 hours a day where victims and their children can receive food, shelter, clothing, case management, support groups, emergency transportation and referrals to legal aid, medical care and treatment for substance abuse and mental health issues. Estimated Cost For Current Shelter Services In Dallas County: 65,187 Shelter Days for Dallas County $41 per day Total Cost: $2,672,667 EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES The goal for emergency shelters in Dallas County is to maintain their current level of service. Outcome #1 Objective: For shelters in Dallas County to continue providing at the current level the following services: protecting victims of family violence in Dallas County from further harm by providing a safe haven available 24 hours a day where victims and their children can receive food, shelter, clothing, case management, support groups, emergency transportation and referrals to legal aid, medical care and treatment for substance abuse and mental health issues. Measurement: Monitor yearly the level of services being provided to domestic violence survivors from the shelters. REFERENCES 1. Texas Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Report, Dallas County Census, Dallas County Cold Weather Homeless Census Survey, January 1, Dallas County Community Focus Group Survey, 2002 DV 3-4

17 CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? There are an overwhelming number of domestic violence victims in Dallas County that do not have access to affordable legal services due to a lack of low cost civil attorneys. There is also a lack of civil legal services that are linguistically and culturally specific to the growing immigrant and non-english speaking victims of family violence. Many of these victims need assistance with protective orders, final divorce decrees, and/or representation in custody issues as well as emergency civil legal representation, in order to safely leave their abuser and gain legal protection for themselves and their children. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Without effective civil legal representation, victims of domestic violence continue to be without legal protection from the abuser and are often unable to safely cut their ties with the abuser. Frequently, perpetrators of domestic violence use the legal system to further manipulate the victim and control their resources. Lack of access to civil legal assistance increases the likelihood that victims suffer continued emotional and physical violence from their abuser. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County needs additional resources and personnel who provide free and low cost legal assistance to victims of domestic violence. The need includes prosecutors, civil attorneys with non-profit agencies who provide free and low cost civil legal assistance, advocates, and support staff. This further includes bilingual personnel who can provide the above services. Impact for Dallas County Providing victims with affordable legal assistance as recommended will improve victims' ability to safely and permanently leave their abusive partners. SUPPORTING STATISTICS In 2002, approximately 17,619 victims needed and received referrals from the District Attorney s Office for civil legal assistance related to domestic violence. Out of that number, 3,443 contacted the District Attorney s Office in person and 12,484 contacted them over the phone. Additionally, the District Attorney s Office accepted 1,692 Protective Order applications. 1 In 2001, 17,289 victims sought assistance. Out of that number, 2,999 contacted the District Attorney s Office in person and 12,449 contacted them over the phone. Additionally, the District Attorney s Office accepted 1,827 Protective Order applications. DV 4-1

18 In 2000, 16,317 victims sought assistance. Out of that number, 2,860 contacted the District Attorney s Office in person and 11,617 contacted them over the phone. Additionally, the District Attorney s Office accepted 1,840 Protective Order applications. 2 In 2002, Legal Services of North Texas disposed of 855 cases in which full legal representation was provided. Legal Services of North Texas handled 935 cases in 2001 and 781 cases in The majority of these cases were contested divorce, custody, visitation or protective order cases and involved family violence. 3 In 2002, The Urban Justice Center disposed of 37 cases in which full legal representation was provided. The majority of these cases were contested divorce, custody, visitation or protective order cases and involved family violence. 4 In 2002, each of the 16 attorneys at Legal Services of North Texas on average disposed of 53 cases with full legal representation. At the same time, three Prosecutors in the Family Violence Division at the District Attorney s Office handled 1,692 Protective Order cases, disposing of 564 cases on average per attorney. 5 DATA CHARTS Line Chart: Request for Civil Legal Assistance, Dallas County District Attorney s Office 6 DV 4-2

19 Legal Services of North Texas - Full Civil Legal Representation in Family Violence Cases Number of Cases Family Law Case Dispositions /1/00 1/2/00 1/3/00 Year Line Chart: Request for Civil Legal Assistance, Legal Services of North Texas 7 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Currently, there are about 20 attorneys in Dallas County working at non-profit agencies who provide free and low cost civil legal assistance for victims of domestic violence. Legal Aid of North West Texas, Inc. 16 Attorneys Legal Action Works (formerly Urban Justice Center) 4 Attorneys The Dallas County District Attorney s Office currently staffs three (3) Protective Order Prosecutors, three (3) Full-Time and three (3) Part-Time Advocates. DV 4-3

20 Location Map of Programs Providing Legal Assistance for Victims of Family Violence 8 Legend Legal Aid of North West Texas, Inc. Legal Action Works Dallas County District Attorney s Office GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Lack of free or low cost civil legal attorneys to assist victims of family violence Lack of Family Violence Advocates specialized in civil legal matters Lack of bilingual personnel to provide advocacy and civil legal representation DV 4-4

21 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal is to acquire a minimum of ten (10) full-time civil attorneys, two (2) Protective Order attorneys, three (3) Victim Advocates and six (6) Assistants. The annual cost for these positions is approximately $790,000. In addition, resources in the amount of $40,000 are needed to pay for professional/contractual services, supplies, equipment and training. EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES Dallas County needs additional resources and personnel who provide free or low cost legal assistance to victims of domestic violence. Outcome #1 Objective: Hire additional staff throughout Dallas County to provide free or low cost legal assistance. Measurement: Monitor yearly the increase of staff providing free and low cost legal assistance. REFERENCES 1. Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Division, Tania Loenneker, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Division, Tania Loenneker, May Legal Aid Of Northwest Texas, Inc., Internal Statistics 4. Urban Justice Center, John Greenan, June Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Division, Tania Loenneker, May 2003 and Legal Aid Of Northwest Texas, Inc., Internal Statistics 6. Line Chart: Request for Civil Legal Assistance, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Line Chart: Request for Civil Legal Assistance, Legal Services of North Texas, May Map: Programs Providing Legal Assistance for Victims of Family Violence, Map Source North Central Texas Council of Governments, Location of Advocates, Informal Telephone Survey, May 2003 DV 4-5

22 VICTIM ADVOCACY PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? There are overwhelming numbers of domestic violence victims in Dallas County who require legal advocacy, but not enough domestic violence advocates to meet the need. There is also a continuing need for advocates to provide services that are culturally and linguistically specific to the growing immigrant and non-english speaking victims of family violence. Without assistance from advocates, victims lack information that would give them options relevant to their rights and safety, and lack a trusted link to the courts that ensures that their voices are heard. This frequently leads to increased risks for further violence as the safety of the victim may not be taken into consideration and the offender is less likely to be held accountable. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? In 2001, more than 18,000 victims sought assistance, either in person or ever the phone, from the Family Violence Division of the Dallas County District Attorney s Office. In 2002, that number rose to 18,599. The number of pending Misdemeanor Family Violence cases, each representing a victim requiring assistance, rose from 3,983 in 2000 to 5,947 in The number of pending Felony Family Violence cases, each representing a victim requiring assistance, rose from an average of 2,408 in 2000 to 3,768 in Victims need information about the criminal justice system, crisis intervention and counseling, local resource information and referrals, and a safe and supportive atmosphere. The complex nature of these cases requires careful and time-intensive preparation for prosecution, and there is an enormous lack of qualified caseworkers that are adequately trained to meet the complex emotional and safety needs of the victims. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County requires additional resources and quality family violence victim advocates working within the criminal justice system. Impact for Dallas County The availability of advocates who build relationships with victims and collaborate with prosecutors results in a more effective outcome of prosecution. Qualified legal advocates ensure that emotional needs of victims in crisis are met, and that the practical needs and safety of the victim are taken into consideration. This ultimately increases the victims safety and accountability. The availability of advocates enhances the experience of victims thus encouraging them to access the system again in the future. SUPPORTING STATISTICS In 2001, more than 18,000 victims sought assistance, either in person or over the phone, from the Family Violence Division of the Dallas County District Attorney s Office. In 2002, that number rose to 18, DV 5-1

23 The number of pending Misdemeanor Family Violence cases, each representing a victim/family requiring assistance, rose from 3,983 in 2000 to 5,947 in The number of pending Felony Family Violence cases, each representing a victim/family requiring assistance, rose from an average of 2,408 in 2000 to 3,768 in Thirty-one of the 32 police agencies of Dallas County have no specially designated family violence victim advocates. 4 One of the approximated 25 municipal courts of Dallas County has specially designated family violence victim advocates. 5 DV 5-2

24 DATA CHARTS Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Pending Misdemeanor Family Violence Cases 6 Pending Cases in Misdemeanor Family Violence Courts Number of Victims Year DV 5-3 County Criminal Court #10 County Criminal Court #11

25 Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Pending Felony Family Violence Cases 7 Pending Felony Family Violence Cases Number of Victims DV 5-4 Year

26 Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Victims Seeking Assistance 8 Family Violence Victims Seeking Assistance at the Dallas District Attorney's Office Number of Victims 19,000 18,500 18,000 17,500 18,599 18, Year DV 5-5

27 Table Comparison of Police Departments with Family Violence Victims Advocates 9 Dallas County Sheriff s Office Dallas PD Addison PD Balch Springs PD Carrollton PD Cedar Hill PD Cockrell Hill PD Coppell PD DeSoto PD Duncanville PD Farmers Branch PD Garland PD Glenn Heights PD Grand Prairie PD Highland Park PD Hutchins PD Police Departments Lacking Family Violence Victims Advocates Lancaster PD Mesquite PD Ovilla PD Richardson PD Rowlett PD Sachse PD Seagoville PD University Park PD Wilmer PD UT Medical School Dallas PD UT Dallas PD North Lake College PD Dallas County Hospital District PD Baylor Health Care System PD Southern Methodist University PD Police Departments with Family Violence Victim Advocates Irving PD Legend Map of Victims of Family Violence Compared to Advocates in the Criminal Justice System 10 Advocates in the Criminal Justice System (represents location in Dallas County) Family Violence Victims DV 5-6

28 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Family Violence Victim Advocates at the District Attorney s Office: Misdemeanor Criminal Courts 2 Felony Criminal Courts 0 Protective Order Court 3 Family Violence Victim Advocates at the Dallas City Attorney s Office 2 Irving Police Department 2 Map of Existing Advocates in the Criminal Justice System 11 Legend Location of Family Violence Advocates in the Criminal Justice System DV 5-7

29 GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Lack of specialized family violence legal advocates housed at municipal law enforcement agencies and courts, and at the District Attorney s Office Lack of such advocates with bilingual skills GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal is to fund a minimum of two (2) domestic violence victim caseworkers, one (1) fulltime intern and one (1) assistant for the annual cost of about $115,106. These professionals will provide legal advocacy at police agencies and municipal, county and district courts in the form of information about the criminal justice system, crisis intervention and counseling, local resource information and referrals, and a safe and supportive atmosphere. This will enhance the quality of case preparation for the investigators and prosecutors, and increase victim safety. An additional $21,250 is required to pay for training, equipment, supplies and professional/contractual services. ESTIMATED ANNUNAL BUDGET POSSIBLE BUDGET CATEGORIES PERSONNEL: Domestic Violence Advocate Case Worker Domestic Violence Advocate Case Worker Full Time Intern Assistant ESTIMATED TOTAL $32,000 $35,000 $19,000 $29,106 CONTRACTUAL AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $10,000 TRAVEL AND TRAINING $5,250 EQUIPMENT $4,000 SUPPLIES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES $2,000 TOTAL $126,366 EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES Dallas County requires additional resources and quality family violence victim advocates working within the criminal justice system. Outcome #1 Objective: Hire additional domestic violence victim caseworkers, full-time interns and assistants. Measurement: Monitor hiring trends within agencies serving the Domestic Violence population. DV 5-8

30 REFERENCES 1. Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Tania Loenneker, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Jenna Lanoue, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Tania Loenneker, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Informal Telephone Survey, Tyler Wright, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Informal Telephone Survey, Tyler Wright, May Bar Chart: Pending Misdemeanor Family Violence Cases, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Bar Chart: Pending Felony Family Violence Cases, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Bar Chart: Family Violence Victims Seeking Assistance, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Table: Comparison of Police Departments with Family Violence Victims Advocates, Informal Telephone Survey, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Map: Victims of Family Violence Compared to Advocates in the Criminal Justice System, United Way Map of Family Violence Victims with Location of Advocates, Informal Telephone Survey, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Map: Location of Existing Advocates in the Criminal Justice System, Map Source North Central Texas Council of Governments, Location of Advocates, Informal Telephone Survey, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May 2003 DV 5-9

31 DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE AND COURTS PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? The caseload of family violence prosecutors and investigators has dramatically increased during the past two years. As the numbers rise, there is a decrease in the amount of time prosecutors and investigators can devote to each case. An increased caseload also increases job stress and job burnout. The loss of quality prosecutors and investigators may compromise offender accountability and victim safety. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Effective prosecution of family violence offenders requires comprehensive and lengthy trial preparation. Prosecutors and investigators spend at least 30 hours preparing a case for trial. Family violence prosecution also requires prosecutors to have specialized knowledge and understanding of family violence dynamics and laws. A heavy caseload decreases the amount of time prosecutors and investigators can devote to a case. This in turn may compromise offender accountability and victim safety. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County requires additional prosecutors and investigators who are trained and devoted to prosecuting family violence cases. Impact on Dallas County An increase in the number of specialized prosecutors and investigators will allow more time for case preparation and enhance effective prosecution. This will lead to quicker case disposition and offender accountability as well as justice for the victim. SUPPORTING STATISTICS At the Dallas County District Attorney's Office the average number of pending cases per family violence felony prosecutor has increased from 120 in 2000 to 188 in 2002 with dispositions increasing from 208 in 2000 to 336 in The average number of pending cases per family violence investigator has increased from 200 in 2000 to 314 in 2002 with dispositions increasing from 346 in 2000 to 561 on The average number of pending cases in the dedicated family violence misdemeanor court (County Criminal Court #10) has increased from 2,853 in 2000 to 4,409 in The number of prosecutors (4) and investigators (2) has not changed. 3 The average number of pending cases in the family violence misdemeanor court that has had a caseload of 50% family violence (County Criminal Court #11) has increased from 1,130 in 2000 to 1,538 in The number of prosecutors (3) and investigators (1) has not changed. 4 DV 6-1

32 DATA CHARTS Bar Chart: Caseload for Felony Family Violence Prosecutors 5 Average Number of Pending Cases and Dispositions per Felony Family Violence Prosecutor Number of Cases/Dispositions Year Pending Felony Cases Dispositions DV 6-2

33 Bar Chart: Caseload for Felony Family Violence Investigators 6 Average Number of Pending Cases per Felony Family Violence Investigator Pending Cases/Dispositions Year Pending Cases Dispositions DV 6-3

34 Bar Chart: Pending Felony Family Violence Cases 7 Pending Felony Family Violence Cases Number of Pending Cases Year Pending felony Cases DV 6-4

35 Bar Chart: Pending Misdemeanor Family Violence Cases 8 Pending Cases in Misdemeanor Family Violence Courts Pending Cases Year County Criminal Court #10 County Criminal Court #11 DV 6-5

36 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Family Violence Prosecutors and Investigators at the District Attorney s Office County Criminal Court # 10: 100% DV Cases (4 Prosecutors, 2 Investigators) County Criminal Court # 11: 100% DV Cases (3 Prosecutors, 1 Investigator) Felony Division: 5 Prosecutors, 3 Investigators Location Map of Existing Services 9 Legend Dallas County District Attorney s Office DV 6-6

37 GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY A gap exists in the number of specialized family violence prosecutors and investigators. A gap exists in the funds available to train specialized prosecutors and investigators. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal is to acquire a minimum of eight (8) specialized Family Violence Felony Investigators and sixteen (16) Felony Family Violence Prosecutors for an annual amount of $1,440,000 to allow for specialized knowledge in family violence and for increasing the quality and effectiveness in the prosecution of family violence cases. In addition, $40,000 is required to fund training, equipment, supplies and operating expenses as well as professional/contractual services. EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES Dallas County requires additional prosecutors and investigators who are trained and devoted to prosecuting family violence cases. Outcome #1: Hire additional prosecutors and investigators who are trained and devoted to prosecuting family violence cases. Measurement: Monitor the yearly increase in staff hired by the Dallas County District s Attorney s office. REFERENCES 1. Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Tania Loenneker, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Tania Loenneker, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Jenna Lanoue, May Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Jenna Lanoue, May Bar Chart: Caseload for Felony Family Violence Prosecutors, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Bar Chart: Caseload for Felony Family Violence Investigators, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Bar Chart: Pending Felony Family Violence Cases, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Bar Chart: Pending Misdemeanor Family Violence Cases, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May 2003 DV 6-7

38 9. Map: Location of Existing Services, Map Source North Central Texas Council of Governments, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May 2003 DV 6-8

39 LAW ENFORCEMENT INTERVENTION RESOURCES PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? Dallas County law enforcement agencies lack resources and qualified personnel to thoroughly investigate family violence cases. Due to very complex victim and offender dynamics, family violence cases require an extraordinary amount of time and a high degree of personnel specialization. There is continuing need for police department to provide services that are culturally and linguistically specific. Law enforcement officials need to be aware of the special issues present with immigrant and non-english speaking victims of family violence. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? The complex nature of family violence also increases the amount of time spent responding to a call, as it requires patrol officers to generate more comprehensive information in the form of determining the predominant aggressor, statements of the parties and evidence collection at the scene. None of the law enforcement agencies in Dallas County currently have a dedicated family violence first response team responding to the scene of a family violence call. It further results in ineffectively prepared cases for prosecution and a greater amount of time between offense and case filing. This in turn compromises victim safety and offender accountability. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County law enforcement agencies need additional resources and qualified personnel to effectively investigate family violence offenses on the scene and at follow-up. In addition to personnel responding to family violence victims there is also a need for comprehensive training of law enforcement officers. Additional needs would include Spanish speaking officers, specialized first responders, qualified and trained investigators, family violence training coordinators, officers to monitor and enforce protective orders, 911 tape coordinators, as well as adequate equipment such as cameras, and devices for the duplication of 911 tapes. Impact for Dallas County Additional resources and qualified personnel will increase the effectiveness of the investigation of family violence offenses. This further increases the protection of the victim, the likelihood that victims access the criminal justice system, and ensures that the batterer is held accountable more effectively and swiftly. SUPPORTING STATISTICS The total reported number of Texas family violence incidents in 2001 was 180,385. This represented a 2.9% increase when compared to These incidents involved 194,112 victims (up 2.4% from 2000) and 190,059 offenders (up 2.2% from 2000). 1 DV 7-1

40 Of 32 police agencies in Dallas County only three have Family Violence Units made up of specialized personnel. 2 There is one training coordinator specializing in the organization and development of family violence training for law enforcement in Dallas County. 3 For those police departments who do not have a dedicated family violence unit: - The 29 police agencies in Dallas County that do not have Family Violence Units responded to 7,122 reported family violence incidents in The 29 police agencies in Dallas County that do not have Family Violence Units responded to 6,262 reported family violence incidents in For those police departments who have a dedicated family violence unit: - At Irving Police Department, the numbers of family violence cases for the first six months of the year have increased from 804 in 2001 to 1,265 during the same period in During those periods, Irving Police Department employed five detectives to work on these cases, meaning the six months caseload per detective increased from 160 to At Dallas Police Department, the approximate caseload per family violence detective increased from an average of 530 for six months in 2001 to an average of 586 for six months in Victims of family violence identified the following as key issues that law enforcement must address: 8 DATA CHARTS - Victims of family violence identified in a 2002 survey better police training as way to prevent family violence in Dallas County. - Victims of family violence identified in a 2002 survey that a better and more thorough response from the police and better training as ways to help intervene for victims of family violence. - Victims of family violence identified in a 2002 survey that more enforcement of protective orders are important to help victims of family violence maintain a violence free life. State of Texas Family Violence Incidents, Family Violence % Change Reported Incidents 180, , % Reported Victims 194, , % Reported Offenders 190, , % DV 7-2

41 Comparison of Police Agencies Providing Specialized Services to Family Violence Victims 10 Dallas County Sheriff s Office Addison PD Balch Springs PD Carrollton PD Cedar Hill PD Cockrell Hill PD Coppell PD Duncanville PD Farmers Branch PD Garland PD Grand Prairie PD Highland Park PD Hutchins PD Lancaster PD Mesquite PD Police Departments Lacking Family Violence Units Ovilla PD Richardson PD Sachse PD Seagoville PD University Park PD Wilmer PD UT Medical School Dallas PD UT Dallas PD Rowlett PD North Lake College PD Glenn Heights PD Dallas County Hospital District PD Baylor Health Care System PD SMU PD Police Agencies with Family Violence Unit Dallas PD Irving PD DeSoto PD Family Violence Caseload Irving Police Department 11 Six Month Case Load Irving Domestic Violence Detectives Number of Cases Six Month Period by Year Total Detectives per year - 5 DV 7-3

42 Family Violence Caseload Dallas Police Department 12 Six Month Case Load Dallas Domestic Violence Detectives Number of Cases Six Month Period by Year DV 7-4

43 Location of Police with Specialized Services Compared to Location of Family Violence Victims 13 Legend Location/Number/ Density of Domestic Violence Victims in Dallas County Irving PD, DeSoto PD, Dallas PD DV 7-5

44 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Map of Existing Specialized Family Violence Units at Police Departments 14 Legend DeSoto Police Department Dallas Police Department Irving Police Department DV 7-6

45 GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Lack of first response teams that include: Social workers, Counselors and Specialized Officers Specialized family violence detectives Family Violence Counselors Protective Order Enforcement Officers Family Violence Training Coordinator Funds for Training Specialized Personnel Equipment for Evidence Collection GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal is to acquire a minimum of one (1) specialized family violence detective, one (1) Protective Order Enforcement Officer, two (2) family violence first response advocates, two (2) family violence counselors, one (1) legal advocate, one (1) training coordinator, one (1) evidence coordinator, one (1) full-time intern and one (1) assistant on an annual basis. Depending on the size of the agency, providing the adequate resources may require multiple personnel in each category. An additional $22,000 annually is required to cover costs for training, supplies, equipment and professional/contractual services. Estimated Budget: $413,106 (1 year) EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES Dallas County law enforcement agencies need additional resources and qualified personnel to effectively investigate family violence offenses on the scene and at follow-up. In addition to personnel responding to family violence victims there is also a need for comprehensive training of officers. Outcome #1 Objective: Acquire additional staff to effectively investigate family violence offenses. Measurement: Monitor increase in staff and cases being investigated. Outcome #2 Objective: Provide comprehensive training of law enforcement officers. Measurement: Monitor number of officer trainings being conducted and attendance. REFERENCES 1. Texas Department of Public Safety, 2001 Crime Report of Texas, Dallas County Domestic Violence Task Force, Sgt. Andrea Perez Dallas Police Department, May 2003 DV 7-7

46 3. Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May Texas Department of Public Safety, 2001 Crime Report of Texas, Texas Department of Public Safety, 2000 Crime Report of Texas, Irving Police Department, Family Violence Unit, Jeannette LaFontaine, Dallas Police Department, Family Violence Unit, Sgt. Andrea Perez, Dallas County Community Planning, Domestic Violence Focus Group, Survey Table: State of Texas Family Violence Incidents, Texas Department of Public Safety, 2001 Crime Report of Texas, Table: Comparison of Police Agencies Providing Specialized Services to Family Violence Victims, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, Informal Telephone Survey, Tyler Wright, May Bar Chart: Family Violence Caseload Irving Police Department, Statistics, Irving Police Department, Family Violence Unit, Jeannette LaFontaine, Bar Chart: Family Violence Caseload Dallas Police Department, Statistics, Dallas Police Department, Family Violence Unit, Sgt. Andrea Perez, Map: Location of Police with Specialized Services Compared to Location of Family Violence Victims, Clients of Domestic Violence Agencies, The Family Place, Paige Flink, May Map: Existing Specialized Family Violence Units at Police, Map Source North Central Texas Council of Governments, Location of Services, Informal Telephone Survey, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May 2003 DV 7-8

47 EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES FOR OUTREACH CLIENTS PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? One of the main contributing factors that affects the decision of domestic violence victims regarding leaving their abuser is financial dependence. The most likely indicator of whether a victim of domestic violence will permanently separate from her/his abuser is whether she/he has the economic resources to survive without the abuser. Therefore, it is incredibly important that victims obtain services, financial support and information from abused women s programs regarding job training and educational opportunities. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? A high percentage (estimated at 80% of clients in outreach and shelter) return to their abuser because of financial dependence. These issues are currently not addressed for all victims seeking counseling or services from abused women s programs. Returning to, and remaining in domestic violence relationships puts women and their children in danger. In addition, remaining in domestic violence relationships is a financial drain to the economy with high medical costs (often County Hospital Services), lost days of productivity, and costs to Welfare Programs. What needs to be done to alleviate the problem? According to a survey conducted in 2002 by the Domestic Violence Focus Group as part of the COG Community Plan Initiative, one of the gaps not adequately addressed for victims of domestic violence is information and financial assistance related to training/education for employment. To adequately address the needs of this population, domestic violence agency outreach programs need funding for tuition, books, etc., as well as staff to facilitate the process for these clients. Impact for Dallas County The costs of remaining in domestic violence relationships affects the economy of Dallas County in all areas of the economy, such as cost of health care in emergency room visits. Domestic violence has an adverse affect on children, and is a strong risk factor in violent or anti-social behavior later in life. If victims can adequately provide for themselves and their children, it is possible that the violent crime rate would decline as well as the cost of these children becoming part of the increasing jail population. SUPPORTING STATISTICS In the survey, domestic violence victims stated that they lack employment opportunities that would adequately meet the basic financial needs for themselves and their children. Many of these clients stated that they have been out of the work force for a long period of time (often as a result of the abuse and isolation), have never been employed, or do not have the skills and education to financially support a family. Research also shows that one of the main reasons that victims return to abusive relationships is they lack the skills/education/training for higher paying salaries which would allow them to DV 8-1

48 maintain their independence, and support their children. Based on information provided by two Domestic Violence agencies (New Beginning Center and The Family Place), 80% of their clients return to the abusive relationship because of lack of adequate skills/education. This impacts their opportunity to qualify for employment that will enable them to support themselves and their children. Data about nonfatal intimate partner violence results in nearly 2.0 million injuries, more that 440,000 of which require medical attention. In addition, victims also lose a total of nearly 8.0 million days of paid work - the equivalent of more than full-time jobs. DATA CHARTS Currently there are no outreach domestic violence programs in Dallas County that provide these services. CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Transitional Living Programs for victims of domestic violence exist at The Family Place, Genesis, and Interfaith. These programs offer opportunities to obtain job skills and education in addition to housing, transportation, and books and supplies being provided. The client must have been in a shelter and apply and be accepted to participate in this type of supportive living program. There are specific criteria in order to be accepted to this program, and the number of clients served is minimal. GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Scholarship/Funding Specifically for Domestic Violence Victims: These services provided by the current service providers are not available in outreach counseling service settings or in domestic violence shelters. Scholarships/financial aid specifically for domestic violence victims who pursue vocational training or certification programs is needed. Funding is also needed to augment low-paying salaries until they complete the programs. Professional Staff: Trained Career/Job Counselors working with domestic violence victims to assist them in pursuing vocational training/job opportunities. Trained staff to pursue currently available scholarship/funding for domestic violence victims. Trained Domestic Violence Counselors to work with domestic violence victims who may have low self-esteem and not be aware of opportunities for which they would qualify. Case Managers/trained volunteers to assist in completion of applications. Educational and Resource Information Community Involvement Work within the community to promote educational and employment opportunities. Job Fairs for domestic violence clients Businesses in the community to work with/offer opportunities for these clients. DV 8-2

49 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Estimated costs: For first year for case-manager staffing, staff for awareness and collaboration with business educational materials, computers for staff and internet access estimate $400,000 for first year. REFERENCES Texas Council of Family Violence web site link Protective Order Project Preventing Domestic Violence One Person at a Time Policy Issues: National Coalition for the Homeless (1999) Fact Sheet #8, Data provided by two Domestic Violence Agencies in Dallas County New Beginning Center and the Family Place Surveys conducted in 2002 by the Domestic Violence Focus Group (COG) to identify the top issues for the Strategic Community Plan Initiative. Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against women in the United States, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (March 2003), Atlanta, Georgia. DV 8-3

50 TRANSPORTION ASSISTANCE FOR DOMESTIC AND FAMILY VIOLENCE SURVIVORS PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? Victims fleeing domestic violence have many challenges facing them that may necessitate extensive travel within the metroplex. If the victim is sheltered at a facility located where public transportation is available, this problem is not as acute as those sheltered where there is no public transportation. If a victim has no transportation, it will be difficult if not impossible to get to mainstream resources, medical and legal appointments, jobs, and most of all, safety. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? A major issue facing victims of domestic violence is the need for transportation. Less than 20% (approximately 18%) of clients seeking shelter have their own vehicle. Public transportation is available in Dallas, Irving, and Garland with limited routes and schedules. However, there are sections of the Metroplex that are not served by public transportation. Taxis are available in most areas; however, the cost is prohibitive with an initial meter charge of $2, for a single rider, and an additional $0.40 charge for each ¼ mile. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Expanding public transportation to all Metroplex areas would alleviate this problem. Unfortunately, that is an issue out of the control of governmental and social service agencies and requires voter referendum. For domestic violence victims being housed in shelters located within Dallas County s public transportation areas, increasing the number of available DART passes would help alleviate the problem. For domestic violence victims being housed outside DART routes, this issue is far more complicated. These victims require increased use of taxi services and the addition of vehicles and personnel to accommodate the transportation requirements of the shelters clients. Impact for Dallas County By increasing the number of available DART passes and taxi or private transportation services, victims of domestic violence will have access to a greater variety of resources. The more rapidly victims of domestic violence can avail themselves of these services the quicker they become self-sufficient and productive citizens who no longer need to rely on non-profit organizations or governmental agencies. SUPPORT STATISTICS According to studies by R. Becerra 1 and M. Sable 2 one of the greatest obstacles for those fleeing domestic abuse in obtaining work and other necessary resources is the lack of transportation. Several studies have questioned women directly about barriers to seeking or retaining work and the most common response of all women sampled by J. Merrill et al 3 was lack of transportation. This certainly holds true in the Dallas area where the six emergency shelters report that only 7.7% of adult clients seen have any form of personal transportation 4. DV 9-1

51 That leaves the vast majority of area clients or 82.3% with no form of personal transportation and reliant upon public transportation, taxis, or volunteer support. On average, 66.3 bus passes are issued to clients per month by the six shelters. 5 The number ranges from over 200 to 10 for those shelters on or near public transportation to zero where public transportation is not available. 6 Where public transportation is not available, clients must rely on Taxi service, shelter employees, or volunteers for all travel. DATA CHARTS Personal Transportation of Victims of Domestic Violence 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Brighter Tomorrows Mosaic Family Place Genesis New Beginning Salvation Army % w/o Cars 80% 75% 84% 80% 80% 95% % with Cars 20% 25% 16% 20% 20% 5% Source: Telephone Interviews, April DV 9-2

52 Shelter Bus Passes Used Per Month Source: Telephone Interviews, April CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS 0 Brighter Tomorrows Mosaic Family Place Genesis New Beginning Salvation Army Per Month Five of the six emergency shelters are located in public transportation areas and make use of DART public transportation. The five are The Family Place, Genesis, New Beginnings, Salvation Army, and Mosaic. Brighter Tomorrows has public transportation access at the Irving shelter only. The other two shelters are in suburban areas that voted not to join the DART system. Where public transportation is not available clients rely upon other modes of transportation, i.e. taxis, shelter employees, or volunteers. The map below depicts general locations for the shelters. Stars represent shelters with access to public transportation. Family Place, Mosaic, Genesis, and Salvation Army represented by Dallas star. New Beginnings represented by Garland star. Brighter Tomorrows Irving shelter represented by Irving star. Source: MapQuest.com, May DV 9-3

53 GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY As a rule, the shelters in areas served by DART make extensive use of public transportation. These shelters do not have a sufficient supply of bus passes to accommodate all transportation requirements monthly and frequently run out prior to month end. Taxis are used on an emergency basis but are cost prohibitive for general every day use. Employees and volunteers frequently fill in the gaps between public transportation and taxis. However, client transportation needs must be set aside when a crisis or emergency occurs at the shelters or with other clients. This could and does result in missed or late arrival at appointments. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES One of the primary goals of Domestic Violence shelters is to provide the necessary resources to enable a client to gain and sustain self-sufficiency. As noted by R. Becerra and M. Sable one of the major obstacles in gaining self-sufficiency is lack of transportation. Increasing the number of monthly bus passes made available to shelter clients can diminish this obstacle. The addition of a van and driver for each of the six Domestic Violence shelters to ensure clients have rapid access to medical, legal, and other available resources increases the probability of attaining self-sufficiency. When the client attains self-sufficiency, their reliance on area non-profit agency or governmental support is either reduced or eliminated. The estimated budget to provide this critical transportation required to obtain and remain employed is $318,000. The breakdown of this cost is detailed below: Item Description Estimated Cost Van $20,000 Driver $20,000 Maintenance on Van $5,000 Insurance for Van $3,000 Increased Cab/Bus Fare allowance $5,000 Sub Total $53,000 Emergency Shelters 6 Total $318,000 EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome #1 Objective: Increasing the number of monthly bus passes made available to shelter clients can diminish this obstacle. Measurement: Count the number of bus passes provided each month to survivors. Outcome #2 Objective: Addition of six (6) vans and drivers covering the shelters throughout the county. Measurement: Monitor yearly progress of hiring personnel and acquiring vehicles. DV 9-4

54 REFERENCES 1. Becerra, R. Immigrant women and welfare reform. Report prepared for Equal Rights Advocates, San Francisco, CA. (1999) 2. Sable, M., Libbus, M., Huneke, D., & Anger, K. Affilia, 14, (1999) 3. Merrill. J., Ring-Kurtz, S., Olufokunbi, D., Aversa, S., & Sherker, J. Women on welfare: A study of the Florida WAGES population. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Treatment Research Institute. (1999) 4. Telephone interviews with Domestic Violence Shelter Executive Directors, April Ibid Ibid Ibid Ibid MapQuest.com, May 2003 DV 9-5

55 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IN SCHOOLS PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? There is a lack of public education regarding domestic and family violence in the school system in Dallas County. Due to this lack of education, domestic and family violence continue to grow among the youth in the county and the belief regarding violence as an acceptable form of conflict resolution persists. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Without family violence education, there is a greater likelihood that children believe that violence is an acceptable way to communicate, as stated in a study of Texans conducted in 2003 by the Texas Council on Family Violence 1. According to the survey 2 conducted by the domestic violence task force of Dallas County in 2002 the #1 gap in comprehensive intervention strategies is education about domestic and family violence in the school systems. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County needs a school system mandate to provide instruction about family violence and other forms of interfamilial abuse from grades K-12. An age-appropriate curriculum should be developed and school and shelters should begin to work together. Cross training of staff, educators, and advocates will enhance this partnership to develop a strong, multidisciplinary team. Teen volunteers could be instructed to deliver peer-to-peer information and co-facilitate teen support groups. Impact on Dallas County At this time there is no comprehensive program being delivered to the youth of Dallas County. These programs would create a reduction in the number of incidents of domestic and family violence among youth and a reduction over time in the numbers of incidents of domestic and family violence and interfamilial abuse among adults. These programs would also create a greater understanding of how to develop relationships of equality and respect and the actual level of occurrence of teen dating violence as a result of better identification of types of assault crimes committed by adolescents SUPPORTING STATISTICS According to the survey 3 conducted in 2002 by the Domestic Violence Task Force of the Community Planning Process: Education of youth ranked 2 nd of the top five things than can be done to prevent domestic violence in Dallas County. Education of youth ranked 5 th in the top five things that are most important to help intervene for victims of domestic and family violence. DV 10-1

56 DATA CHARTS Number of Youth in Dallas County by School District DISTRICT Dallas ISD 161, , ,327 Garland ISD 50,312 51,607 53,758 Richardson ISD 35,138 35,245 35,245 Mesquite ISD 32,274 33,086 32,674 Irving ISD 28,487 29,380 30,975 Carrollton/Farmers Branch ISD 24,134 24,561 25,279 Grand Prairie ISD 20,257 20,577 21,248 Duncanville ISD 10,319 10,625 10,831 Coppell ISD 9,240 9,659 9,820 Desoto ISD 6,941 7,123 7,433 Cedar Hill ISD 6,481 6,941 7,297 Highland Park ISD 5,848 5,869 5,981 Lancaster ISD 4,206 4,138 4,347 Wilmer/Hutchins ISD 3,283 3,025 3,010 Sunnyvale ISD TOTAL 398, , ,664 Source: Survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, Number of Teen Assaults in Dallas County Felony Sexual Assault Aggravated Assault Misdemeanor Assault Source: Dallas County Juvenile Department 2001 Annual Report 5 86% of all felonies were committed by males 67% of all misdemeanors were committed by males DV 10-2

57 Total County Student Enrollment Total County Student Enrollment Source: Survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, Students Educated in Dallas County about Domestic Violence (first quarter) New Beginning Center The Family Place Source: Survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, DV 10-3

58 Domestic Violence Education Activities Dallas County - All Schools % Tarrant County Dallas County (4.84%) (0.97%) Dallas County (0.96%) (2.1%) (6.33%) Collin County 109 (2.02%) 30 (0.58%) % (0.34%) (0.18%) (0.47%) (0.64%) (1.71%) (0.15%) (13.43%) Dallas County (1.77%) Rockwall County Kaufman County Dallas County Ellis County Dallas County zip codes with reported domestic violence (DV) education activities are shaded in gray. 0.47% of the total student population for Dallas County received DV education services. The number and percentage (parentheses) of the total student population receiving DV education services for individual zip codes is indicated. The Dallas city limits are indicated by the bold black line. DV 10-4

59 Domestic Violence Education Activities Dallas County - Elementary Schools Collin County Dallas County Tarrant County Dallas County (7.75%) (3.8%) (13.04%) 5.22% 1.72% (0.15%) (0.26%) (13.43%) Dallas County Rockwall County Kaufman County Dallas County Ellis County Dallas County zip codes with reported domestic violence (DV) elementary school education activities are shaded in gray. 0.52% of the total elementary school student population for Dallas County received DV education services. The percentage of the elementary school student population receiving DV education services for individual zip codes is indicated in parentheses. The Dallas city limits are indicated by the bold black line. DV 10-5

60 Domestic Violence Education Activities Dallas County - Middle Schools Collin County Dallas County Tarrant County Dallas County (5.18%) (3.51%) 2.62% 1.74% (3.03%) (2.65%) Dallas County Rockwall County Kaufman County Dallas County Ellis County Dallas County zip codes with reported domestic violence (DV) middle school education activities are shaded in gray. 0.39% of the total middle school student population for Dallas County received DV education services. The percentage of the middle school student population receiving DV education services for individual zip codes is indicated in parentheses. The Dallas city limits are indicated by the bold black line. DV 10-6

61 Domestic Violence Education Activities Dallas County - High Schools Collin County Dallas County Tarrant County Dallas County (1.76%) (1.82%) 1.24% (0.50%) (0.38%) (1.53%) (1.45%) (5.78%) Dallas County Rockwall County Kaufman County Dallas County Ellis County Dallas County zip codes with reported domestic violence (DV) high school education activities are shaded in gray. 0.43% of the total high school student population for Dallas County received DV education services. The percentage of the high school student population receiving DV education services for individual zip codes is indicated in parentheses. The Dallas city limits are indicated by the bold black line. Source: all maps from survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, DV 10-7

62 Zip Total K-6 Total 7-8 Total 9-12 Total K ,094 1,846 6,753 12, ,913 1,172 4, ,526 1,636 2,621 9, ,010 1, ,784 3,999 4,821 13, , , ,932 1,148 2,463 7, ,999 3,176 4,453 12, ,013 3, ,063 1,165 1,416 3, , ,632 6, ,071 2,250 5, ,461 1,882 2,598 8, ,708 1,979 2,009 8, ,109 2,788 4,230 12, , , , , ,319 1,741 2,854 7, ,957 1,669 2,280 7, ,846 1,226 2,618 6, ,063 1,193 3, ,672 2,460 2,149 7, ,965 2,545 2,239 6, ,832 1,906 2,461 6, ,136 3, , ,228 4, ,991 4,427 1,506 12, ,933 2,304 3,999 12, ,266 1, ,209 2, ,577 3,212 4, ,865 4,188 6, ,163 1,143 1,899 5,205 Zip Total K-6 Total 7-8 Total 9-12 Total K ,648 1,897 1,848 5, ,169 2, ,666 1,785 2,086 8, , ,086 2, ,999 1,889 2,581 15, , , , ,382 5, , ,851 5, ,544 2,376 1,355 9, ,589 2,154 3,845 17, , , ,890 3, ,427 1, ,060 5, ,237 1,329 4,375 11, , ,644 9, ,740 1,318 1,770 7, ,860 1,220 1,813 5, ,997 1, ,997 1,514 1,869 7, ,249 1,881 3, , , , , , ,737 5, ,270 3, , ,668 4, ,375 1,727 6, ,621 1,274 2,122 5, ,646 1,593 3, , ,227 2, , ,335 Total 223,894 82, , ,669 Table 1: Table 1 details the student populations for the Elementary schools (Tot K-6), Middle schools (Tot 7-8) and High schools (Tot 9-12) in each Dallas County zip code. The total number of students (Tot K-12) is a summary of the student population for all educational institutions in the corresponding zip code. DV 10-8

63 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS New Beginning Center provides education to youth in schools The Family Place provides education to youth in schools Brighter Tomorrows provides education to youth in schools Genesis data not available Domestic and Family Violence Agencies in Dallas County Providing Community Education NBC C TFP BT GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Since less than 1% of student population in Dallas County is receiving any domestic or family violence education there is a great lack of education on this topic to students from kindergarten through 12 th grade. Insufficient number of quality trained professionals to fill this education need. DV 10-9

64 Lack of community-wide awareness regarding the need for domestic and family violence education. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Collaborate with each of the 15 school districts within Dallas County to provide opportunities for domestic and family violence education on elementary, middle and high school levels. Develop or acquire age-appropriate curriculum for instruction. Hire and train staff to go into schools as educators. Train school staff, educators and advocates to provide support for curriculum, domestic and family violence educators and students. Provide teen leadership training to support domestic and family violence educators and facilitate peer-to-peer support within the schools. Provide training for school staff and counselors to facilitate teen dating violence support groups and age appropriate support groups. An estimated annual budget for the County to educate 40% of the 411,000 students is $3,622,000. This includes salary and fringe for 70 educators and $822,000 for supplies. The $822,000 in supplies is estimating a cost of $5 per student. EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES There should be a school system mandate to provide instruction about domestic and family violence and other forms of interfamilial abuse multiple times from grades K-12. An age appropriate curriculum should be developed or acquired. Collaboration between schools and shelters would ensure quality services. Cross training of staff, educators, and advocates will enhance this partnership and develop a strong, multidisciplinary team. Outcome #1 Objective: Collaborate with each of the 15 school districts within Dallas County to provide opportunities for domestic and family violence education on elementary, middle and high school levels. Measurement: Record meetings and outcomes in log. Outcome #2 Objective: Develop or acquire age appropriate curriculum for instruction. Measurement: Monitor through fruition of delivered curriculum. Outcome #3 DV 10-10

65 Objective: Hire and train staff to go into schools as educators. Measurement: Monitor through fruition of staff hires and training. Outcome #4 Objective: Train school staff, educators and advocates to provide support for curriculum, domestic and family violence educators and students. Measurement: Record the number of staff, educators and advocates trained. Outcome #5 Objective: Provide teen leadership training to support domestic and family violence educators and facilitate peer-to- peer support within the schools. Measurement: Record the number of teens trained to facilitate peer-to-peer support. Outcome #6 Objective: Provide training for school staff and counselors to facilitate teen dating violence support groups and age appropriate support groups. Measurement: Record number of school staff and counselors trained to facilitate support groups. REFERENCES 1. Prevalence, Perceptions and Awareness of Domestic Violence in Texas, Saurage Research, Inc. for Texas Council on Family Violence, February Survey conducted by the Domestic Violence Task Force of Dallas County in Survey conducted by the Domestic Violence Task Force of Dallas County in Survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, Dallas County Juvenile Department 2001 Annual Report 6. Survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, Survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, Survey conducted by Education Problem Subcommittee, 2003 DV 10-11

66 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? The majority of domestic violence victims access services outside the criminal justice system, such as health care, social services, education, churches, etc. Professionals working in these systems are commonly not trained to identify signs of abuse, offer safe and appropriate interventions, or document effectively. This lack of appropriate intervention creates a barrier for the victim to reach out for help, to obtain important safety resources, or to leave the abusive partner. This in turn compromises the safety of numerous victims and their children. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? The lack of awareness and training among professionals who come in contact with victims of domestic violence decreases the likelihood that victims are approached in a manner that they may reach out for help. Lack of training often results in improper documentation of evidence or suspicions of abuse, and frequently leads well-meaning professionals to offer unsafe and ineffective recommendations to the victims. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Dallas County requires resources to organize and provide up-to-date specialized training and education to professionals in order to increase the victim s access to safety information. This involves personnel specialized in family violence to network, coordinate, develop and provide educational seminars to professionals in a variety of job categories. Providing specialized family violence training that is tailored to the profession requires intensive logistical organization, time and resources. Impact for Dallas County Personnel and resources to organize professional training will increase awareness of family violence issues among professionals who come in contact with victims. It will provide them with solid tools to identify signs of abuse, to intervene in a respectful and effective manner, and to properly document statements and evidence that may help in the prosecution of the perpetrator and to protect the victim. Professional training will make effective use of an excellent opportunity for Dallas County to reach out to victims who may not access the criminal justice system for help. SUPPORTING STATISTICS In 2002, 1,118 Dallas County professionals received specialized training through the District Attorney s Office alone. This is an increase from 1,003 professionals trained in 2001 and 494 in New Beginning Center trained approximately 1,330 professionals during FY DV 11-1

67 Victims and service providers surveyed by the Dallas County Community Plan Domestic Violence Focus Group stated the need for domestic violence education and specifically referred to education for medical professionals. 3 60% of individuals surveyed in Texas feel that the State of Texas does not do enough for the victims of domestic violence, and want to increase resources available to fund domestic violence prevention efforts like public education. 4 DATA CHARTS Professionals Trained by the Dallas County District Attorney s Office 5 Dallas County Professionals Trained by District Attorney's Office Number of Professionals Trained Professionals Trained Years Source: Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Division Statistics DV 11-2

68 Family Violence Victims in Dallas County Compared to Programs Training Professionals 6 Programs specializing in the coordination and delivery of family violence training to professionals in Dallas County (in red) in comparison to the distribution of domestic violence clients. Legend Family Violence Victims Location of Programs Training Professionals Domestic Violence Clients in Dallas County, The Family Place, Paige Flink, May 2003 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Current service providers that fund a position with a focus on the coordination and development of family violence training for professionals include: Dallas County District Attorney s Office (Regional Training Coordinator) New Beginning Center (Community Relations Coordinator) DV 11-3

69 Map of Existing Programs Providing Family Violence Training for Professionals 7 Legend Location of Programs Providing Family Violence Training for Professionals GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Lack of personnel specialized in coordinating family violence training Lack of resources to organize and provide specialized family violence training for different professional groups GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal is to fund a minimum of one (1) training coordinator, one (1) part-time assistant and one (1) full-time intern for an estimated annual cost of $73,000. These professionals will provide and organize specialized family violence training for a variety of professionals coming in DV 11-4

70 contact with victims. In addition, $26,000 is required to cover supplies, equipment, training and contractual services. EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome #1 Objective: Hire appropriate staff to provide and organize specialized family violence training. Measurement: Monitor the additional trainings being offered and number of participants receiving the specialized training. REFERENCES 1. Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Division, Tania Loenneker, May New Beginning Center Year End Report Fiscal Year Dallas County Community Plan Domestic Violence Focus Group Survey Results, Texas Council on Family Violence & Saurage Research, Inc: Prevalence, Perceptions and Awareness of Domestic Violence in Texas, Executive Summary, February Line Chart: Professionals Trained by the Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Division, May Map: Family Violence Victims in Dallas County Compared to Programs Specialized in Training Professionals, Map Source: The Family Place, Paige Flink, May 2003, Program 7. Map: Location of Programs Providing Family Violence Training for Professionals, Map Source North Central Texas Council of Governments, Location of Programs, Informal Telephone Survey, Dallas County District Attorney s Office, Family Violence Unit, May 2003 DV 11-5

71 SUPERVISED VISITATION PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? Dallas County lacks low-cost supervised visitation services that are needed to adequately provide supervised visitation (SV) and monitored exchanges (ME) for court-ordered families. Without access to visitation and safe exchange centers, the children in these families are at risk for emotional and physical abuse including witnessing violence, abduction, and/or feelings of abandonment if contact with a parent has been denied. Court systems also become overburdened with cases and have nowhere to send parents who need these services. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Texas law 1 requires judges to presume that ordering SV in cases where there is evidence of family violence or child abuse is in the best interest of the child. To prevent further risk to these children, an overwhelming number of parents are ordered to utilize SV or ME services, but there are more low-income parents who need this service than there are low-cost services. According to the Dallas County District Clerk s Office 12,787 divorce cases were filed in 2002, along with 6,635 separate suits affecting parent/child custody and support. On average, 68% of divorce cases have children in the home, and of those, 66% have multiple children in the home. The Dallas County Associate Family Court Judges estimate that they order between 728-1,092 of their cases to a SV or ME center per year. This far exceeds the current capacity of the only two existing visitation centers in Dallas County which, combined, can only serve around 260 cases a year, leaving an estimated families without this service. SV and ME centers are costly to operate due to the need for professional, well-trained staff; sliding fee scales that accommodate low-income families, bi-lingual service provision; large facilities that allow for separate entrances; large areas for visits; on-site police protection; and building security measures such as camera systems, metal detectors, secured access entrances, and panic buttons. What needs to be done to alleviate the problem? In order to facilitate parents safely having a role in their children s lives, adequate funding must be provided for SV and ME services so that all parents have access. The capacity of the current SV and ME centers in Dallas County should be increased to insure access for all families, including those with language and socio-economic barriers. Impact for Dallas County Literature shows that children typically benefit from having access to both parents as long as it can be done safely 2. Adequate services made available at SV and ME centers will increase safety for children and parents in Dallas County and can help many children re-build the parent/child relationship. SUPPORTING STATISTICS 12,787 Divorce cases in Dallas County in 2002 DV 12-1

72 6,635 Custody/support cases apart from divorce in Dallas County in ,422 Total cases from Dallas County Family courts in ,203 Divorce Cases in Dallas County in ,105 Divorce Cases in Dallas County in On average, 68% of divorce cases have at least one child in the home. Sixty-six percent of those have multiple children in the home 4. Around 728-1,092 of these cases per year would benefit from supervision while either exchanging children or while one parent visits children. An average of these numbers = DATA CHARTS Divorce Cases in Dallas County v. Number Cases Needing Supervised Visitation Services and Number Available. 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2, ,203 13,105 12,787 13, # Divorce Cases in Dallas County Families Needing Services Services Available *2003 numbers are projected Families Needing Services 5 # Divorce Cases in Dallas County 3 DV 12-2

73 2002 ZIP CODES FOR FLP FAMILY CENTER CLIENTS HANNAH S HOUSE ZIP CODES NOT AVAILABLE Denton County Collin county Dallas County Rockwall County Kaufman County Tarrant County 9 = out of area completely Ellis County CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS FLP Family Center (FLP) Dallas: 8915 Harry Hines Blvd DV 12-3

74 Hannah s House (HH) Irving: 3455 N. Beltline Rd. HH FLP GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY There are not enough low-cost services to handle the number of families who need them. What needs to be done? Provide adequate funding for supervised visitation and monitored exchange services so that services can be offered on a sliding scale basis thus ensuring accessibility for all parents, including those with language or socio-economic barriers. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal # 1; Increase safety for parents and children during monitored exchanges or supervised visits. Goal # 2: Reduce the negative effects of family violence on victims by providing a safe, neutral, child-centered environment where trained professionals facilitate visitation with the noncustodial parent. Budget: Current Budget Total: $394,000 Hannah s House $104,000 per year FLP Family Center (Stands for Faith and Liberty s Place, Family Center) $290,000 per year Additional Budget Needed: $984,750 in order to increase services. This entails all operating expenses needed per year to expand services. DV 12-4

75 Based on 260 clients being served per year versus an average of 910 needing service per year, an estimated 650 (71%) are not receiving service that need it. EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES Goal # 1: Obtain 75% of the security measures listed above for the supervised visitation center. Goal #2: Brief questionnaire administered upon intake of new clients into supervised visitation setting. This will be re-administered six months later to determine measurement of change and comfort levels. REFERENCES 1. Texas law = Texas Family Code effective September NYSPCC Professionals Handbook on Providing Supervised Visitation, Reported numbers from Dallas County District Clerk s Office; 2002 statistic. 4. Sample of 5,000 divorce cases tallied by Ona Foster (list from Dallas County District Clerk s Office), April Survey of Dallas County Associate Family Court Judges ( Survey given by Judge Christine Collie to Judge Mary Brown, Judge John Elder, Judge Lewis Nicholson, Judge Beth Maultsby, Judge Scott Beauchamp, and Judge Kim Mercier), May DV 12-5

76 IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE SERVICES PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? Violence against refugee and immigrant women is seriously underreported. This population in Dallas County has increased dramatically, yet domestic violence services for this group has not grown proportionately. Immigrant victims face additional hurdles to acquisition of services due to lack of culturally and linguistically sensitive services; basic cultural misunderstanding; fear of authority; and lack of awareness about assistance. When not helped, these victims continue in abusive relationships and ultimately exacerbating the drain on law enforcement, medical care facilities, Child Protective Services (and schools) and other service providers. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? Increased awareness has led to basic education about domestic violence. There is a shortage of culturally and linguistically competent caseworkers to help immigrants who may not seek services for fear it may negatively affect their immigration status. Many victims will not speak about abuse to anyone not from their own ethnic group; victims are from many ethnic groups. Law enforcement officials need to be aware of special issues present with immigrant victims of domestic violence. Fear of authority may be prevalent, and many of these victims fled repressive regimes in which government was the main perpetrator of violence. Many victims are told if they file a complaint, they will be deported. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? Increase the number of culturally sensitive and linguistically competent case managers. Training for police/law enforcement to work with this victim population. Increase in the number of attorneys providing low cost or free services and are cognizant of the implications of actions on their client s immigration status. Impact for Dallas County Adding and improving services to address the unique issues faced by immigrant victims would aid in transition to economic self-sufficiency. The cost of remaining in domestic violence relationships affects the economy of Dallas County (i.e. high costs of health care in emergency room visits, lost work days, high rate of change of jobs related to domestic violence). Helping immigrant victims with domestic violence services benefits the County. DV 13-1

77 SUPPORTING STAT ISTICS In 2000, Hispanics made up 30% of the county s population and Asians 4%. The major problems facing these immigrant victims of domestic violence are linguistic and cultural barriers. In the 1980 s Dallas County received many immigrants from Southeast Asia but by 2000, a more varied group was present including a high number of African immigrants. Reporting of abuse from these communities has shown a steady increase as awareness through outreach and education grows. According to the United Way 2002 Community Assessment, one of the principal demographic shifts in Dallas County is the rapid growth of the immigrant population, which more than doubled between 1990 and The Dallas area is a much more diverse community than ever before and will grow more diverse in the future Both language and culture can serve as barriers to service. 1 DATA CHARTS Source: 2 Mosaic Family Services (formerly East Dallas Counseling Center) Reports of DV Victims Served Fiscal 1998 Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Vietnamese Bosnian N/A N/A Korean N/A N/A Kurdish N/A Other Arabic N/A N/A 2 25 Other ethnicity (non-u.s. origin) N/A N/A N/A 39 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS Domestic Violence Shelters Full Services for Immigrant Populations Mosaic Domestic Violence Shelters Limited Services for Immigrant Population Genesis Woman s Shelter The Family Place Shelter New Beginning Center Brighter Tomorrows DV 13-2

78 Legal Services: Mosaic Urban League Outreach: Mosaic Genesis Brighter Tomorrows Catholic Charities New Beginning Center The Family Place GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Although many community agencies provide services for abused women of the majority population and the larger minority groups - African-American and Hispanic - culturally and linguistically sensitive services targeting the other ethnic, cultural, and linguistic minorities are extremely limited. In the community groups themselves, consisting of people having the same cultural origins, education is needed to support their attempts to educate those with less awareness in ways of combating the stereotypes of gender discrimination which may exist in their own families. The gaps include the need for: culturally competent case managers, support groups for survivors, education and training of law enforcement personnel, availability of interpreters/translators, more shelter space, and legal services. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goal is to promote and advocate for greater awareness and confidence among women of underserved ethnic, cultural, and language minority populations, thus reducing and preventing domestic violence and enabling them to live healthy lives free from abuse. The following objectives serve to meet this goal: Serve immigrant/refugee survivors of domestic violence, providing a buffer between them and other available service providers. Provide culturally sensitive education about domestic violence. Help victims overcome basic cultural misunderstanding, seek assistance when needed, understand the availability of services, and ultimately lead healthy, selfsufficient lives free from domestic violence. Hiring culturally and linguistically competent bilingual case managers from many of the ethnic groups served is the key to achieving the goal. Some of these can be part-time. Supervisory personnel oversee the education and continuing training of case managers. Informational materials need to be in several languages. Achieving the above-mentioned goals and filling many gaps in services can be achieved with an annual budget of $175,000. DV 13-3

79 EVALUATION AND OUTCOME MEASURES The goal is to promote and advocate for greater awareness and confidence among women of underserved ethnic, cultural, and language minority populations, thus reducing and preventing domestic violence and enabling them to live healthy lives free from abuse. Outcome #1 Objective: Serve immigrant/refugee survivors of domestic violence, providing a buffer between them and other available service providers. Measurement: Monitor the number of immigrant/refugee survivors of domestic violence are being provided services. Outcome #2 Objective: Provide culturally sensitive education about domestic violence. Measurement: Monitor yearly the amount of materials and services being offered in different languages and are considered culturally sensitive. Outcome #3 Objective: Help victims overcome basic cultural misunderstanding, seek assistance when needed, understand the availability of services, and ultimately lead healthy, self-sufficient lives free from domestic violence. Measurement: Provide thorough domestic violence outreach efforts in languages sensitive to many immigrants/refugees. Outcome #4 Objective: Hire culturally and linguistically competent bilingual case managers from many of the ethnic groups served are the key to achieving the goal. Measurement: Monitor yearly the number of new hires providing culturally and linguistically competent services to the immigrant/refugee population. REFERENCES 1. United Way 2002 Community Assessment: Key Trends (2002) 2. (2003) DV 13-4

80 JUVENILE SERVICES PROBLEM What is the problem for Dallas County? The problem in Dallas County is a lack of services for juveniles who commit family and partner assault crimes and their victims. When juveniles who commit crimes do not receive services they continue to re-offend and potentially escalate. Juvenile crime victims who do not receive services will be at risk for further victimization and will lack knowledge of available legal rights. Why is this a problem for Dallas County? This is a problem because without intervention these juveniles will continue to harm others and eventually enter into the adult criminal justice system. Additionally, adolescent victims of violence can obtain a protective order, thus increasing the number of reported juvenile victimizations. It is the experience of local juvenile battering intervention and prevention (BIPP) service providers that these juvenile offenders come from homes where they have experienced first hand the dynamics of domestic and family violence. What needs to be done to alleviate this problem? It is recommended that agencies in Dallas County develop resources and provide staff in order to track specific types of juvenile assault crimes and provide services to teen family and partner assault perpetrators. Impact for Dallas County Tracking these crimes will provide more accurate information regarding the level and severity of this crime in Dallas County. Providing intervention and prevention services to juvenile offenders will be crucial in reducing and possibly ending domestic violence in Dallas County. SUPPORTING STATISTICS While the data available from the Dallas County Juvenile Department does not specify the victims of assaults by gender and relationship to the perpetrator, the data does indicate that the assaults are a major crime perpetrated by juveniles. Furthermore, for the year 2001, males committed 86% of all felonies and 67% of all misdemeanors. Offense Types Felony Sexual Assault Felony Aggravated Assault Misdemeanor Assault Dallas County Juvenile Department 2001 Annual Report 1 According to Lieutenant Lanum of the City of Dallas Youth Crimes Division, adolescent family violence arrests are as follows: DV 14-1

81 Source: Lieutenant Lanum of the City of Dallas Youth Crimes Division 2 However, these numbers only represent 1 out of the 20 cities in Dallas County. Furthermore, as domestic violence is an underreported crime for adults, a similar pattern is to be expected for juveniles. To our knowledge, statistics for adolescent dating violence and abuse have never been collected. This subcommittee conducted a survey of 18 local high schools and it was found that only two high schools of those that were contacted were knowledgeable of recent laws pertaining to juvenile protective orders. Additionally, one of the two had a student who had obtained a protective order. Dallas County City High School Are you aware of dating violence protective orders? Carrollton-Farmers Branch Turner High School No Cedar Hill Cedar Hill High School No Coppell Coppell High School No Dallas Hillcrest High School No Dallas South Oak Cliff High School No Dallas Highline High School No DeSoto DeSoto High School No Duncanville Duncanville High School No Ferris Ferris High School No Garland Garland High School Yes Garland Rowlett High School No Grand Prairie Grand Prairie High School No Highland Park Highland Park High School No Irving Macarthur High School No Lancaster Lancaster High School No Mesquite Mesquite High School No Richardson Lake Highlands High School No Wilmer-Hutchins Wilmer-Hutchins High School Yes Source: Survey conducted by sub-committee, March DV 14-2

82 DATA CHARTS Felony Sexual Assault Felony Aggravated Assualt Misdemanor Assualt Source: Dallas County Juvenile Department 2001 Annual Report Number of Adolescent Family Violence Arrests in thecity of Dallas Source: City of Dallas Youth Crimes Division 4 DV 14-3

83 CURRENT SERVICE PROVIDERS There are currently two agencies that address juvenile offenders of family/dating violence: The Family Place New Beginning Center GAPS IN SERVICE DELIVERY Lack of education regarding juvenile protective orders Lack of services specific to juvenile family/dating violence Lack of accurate tracking of these types of juvenile assault crimes Lack of funding for juvenile family/dating violence programs GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. Acquire staff to develop and track specific types of juvenile assault crimes. 2. Develop a juvenile family/domestic violence program. 3. Acquire and train staff to provide services to teen family/domestic violence perpetrators. Estimated Budget: $350,000 per year. It is estimated that each Battering Intervention Program (BIPP) in Dallas County will need $50,000 a year for supplies, salaries and benefits to conduct a juvenile BIPP. DV 14-4