1 THE LEGAL REGIME OF STRAITS USED FOR INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION Institute of Diplomacy and Foreign Relations (IDFR) IDFR Maritime Seminar Series Straits of Malacca Kuala Lumpur, 10 November 2009 Professor Dr. Abdul Ghafur Hamid Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of laws International Islamic University Malaysia
2 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The state of the law prior to UNCLOS III 3. The negotiations during the UNCLOS III: Freedom of passage v. Innocent passage 4. The regime of straits under UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Conclusion
3 1. Introduction A strait is a narrow stretch of sea connecting two extensive areas of sea (or a narrow passage connecting two sections of the high seas). Almost by definition, therefore, straits are of crucial strategic and commercial importance. The principal maritime powers made it clear, in the course of negotiations in UNCLOS III, that, for them, satisfactory provision for passage through straits was a sine qua non of a new convention on the law of the sea.
4 Introduction [Cont.] Not every geographical strait presents a problem. Problems arose when: - Breadth of the TS - expanded from 3 to 12 miles and thus most of the international Straits have become part of the TS of Straits states; disappearance of high seas corridors. Straits States wanted to stick to the regime of innocent passage. But the regime of innocent passage was not acceptable to maritime States, which claimed for freedom of navigation. This is the problem of what have come to be known as straits used for international navigation. Regime of transit passage : the result of negotiations and a compromise formula.
5 2. The state of the law prior to UNCLOS III The Corfu Channel case The key passage in the Court s judgment is as follows: It is, in the opinion of the Court, generally recognized and in accordance with international custom that States in time of peace have a right to send their war ships through straits used for international navigation between the two parts of the high seas without the previous authorization of a coastal State, provided that the passage is innocent. Unless otherwise prescribed in an international convention, there is no right for a coastal State to prohibit such passage through straits in time of peace.
6 UNCLOS I and the Geneva Convention Article 16 (4) of the Geneva convention on the Territorial sea and Contiguous Zone reads as follows: There shall be no suspension of innocent passage of foreign ships through Straits which are used for international navigation between one part of the high seas and another part of the high seas or the territorial sea of a foreign State.
7 UNCLOS I and the Geneva Convention [Cont.] Article 16 (4) extends to straits between the high seas and the territorial sea of a foreign State. This extension was strongly opposed by Indonesia and Saudi Arabia because it would raise the Straits of Tiran to the international strait status. Unhappiness over this issue was indicated. Despite the efforts of UNCLOS I, there was still a measure of uncertainty.
8 3. The negotiations during the UNCLOS III: Freedom of passage v. Innocent passage The negotiations during the UNCLOS III reflected the rivalry between two competing interest groups: (1) the maritime powers wishing to freely navigate through the strait; and (2) Straits States who were concerned to protect its security and other interests in their territorial waters.
9 3.1 The interests of the maritime powers: freedom of passage/ free transit The main problem: there were some 116 straits which would become entirely territorial sea straits if a 12- mile breadth were to be generally accepted, whereas, at that time, there existed in these straits a central belt of high seas in which the freedom of the high seas might be enjoyed. The idea of freedom of passage/ free transit is primarily based on the freedom of navigation, one of the traditional freedoms of the high seas. All ships are free to navigate on the high seas (Art. 87). The flag State has an exclusive jurisdiction over ships flying their flags on the high seas (Art. 92; Lotus case).
10 3.2 The interests of coastal States: innocent passage The coastal States were firm in their opposition to anything more than innocent passage through straits. Example: draft articles proposed by the following eight States: Cyprus, Greece, Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Philippines, Spain and Yemen (the Eight Power draft). Regarding the Straits of Malacca and Singapore, in the Joint Statement dated 16 November 1971, Indonesia and Malaysia agreed that the Straits of Malacca and Singapore are not international straits, while fully recognizing their use for international shipping in accordance with the principle of innocent passage. Singapore simply took note of their position.
11 Malaysia s stand in UNCLOS III in respect of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore However, during UNCLOS III, the three States reached an understanding with the principal user States, which allowed them to accept the application of the UN Convention to the straits, while safeguarding their powers of enforcement. (See Letter dated 28 April 1982 from the Representative of Malaysia to the President of the Conference A/CONF. 62/L. 145).
12 3.3 Transit passage: the compromise formula After long and arduous negotiations, the two competing interest groups finally reached agreement to adopt the compromise formula of the transit passage regime. This agreement on transit passage is an important component of the overall package of the new Convention. Acceptance of this regime made it possible for the Conference to reach agreement on 12 nautical miles as a maximum breadth of the territorial sea.
13 4. The regime of straits under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 UNCLOS III finally adopted the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on 30 April Part III of the Convention (Articles 34 to 45) deals with Straits Used for International Navigation.
14 4.1 Different regimes for different straits: the overall idea of the UNCLOS 1982 Under Part III of the UNCLOS, the regime applicable to any particular strait depends upon the category into which it falls. The four categories of straits 1. Straits governed by long-standing special conventions; 2. Straits with central corridors of high seas or EEZ; 3. Straits subject to the regime of innocent passage; and 4. Straits subject to the regime of transit passage.
15 (1) Straits governed by long-standing special conventions Article 35 (c): The straits regime laid down in Part III of the Convention does not affect the legal regime in straits in which passage is regulated in whole or in part by long-standing international conventions in force specifically relating to such straits. A good example is the Turkish Straits the Bosphorus and Dardanelles, passage through which is regulated by the Montreux Convention of 1936.
16 (2) Straits with central corridors of high seas or EEZ Article 36: Part III does not apply to straits through which there is a high seas route, or a route through an EEZ, of similar convenience with respect to its navigational and hydrographical characteristics. This situation will normally be possible in a strait wider than 24 miles. The general (non-straits) regime of innocent passage will apply to those parts of the strait which lie within the territorial sea limits and the regime of freedom of navigation through the high seas or the EEZ will apply in the middle section through the strait. The so-called Florida Strait between USA and Cuba would be an example.
17 (3) Straits subject to the regime of innocent passage Under the UNCLOS, the two special types of straits are subject to the regime of innocent passage. First, under Article 38 (1), a strait formed by an island of a State bordering the strait and its mainland, where there exists seaward of the island a route of similar convenience through high seas or EEZ, is entirely excluded from the transit passage regime. This is known as Messina exception because the Straits of Messina between Italy and Sicily illustrates this very well.
18 Straits of Messina (Sicily)
19 Secondly, under Article 45(1) (b), the regime of innocent passage applies in straits connecting a part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone and the territorial sea of a foreign State. A good example would be the Straits of Tiran. In respect of both categories of straits, there shall be no suspension of innocent passage through them (non-suspendable innocent passage) (Article 45 (2).
21 (4) Straits subject to the regime of transit passage Article 37: The regime of transit passage applies to straits which are used for international navigation between one part of the high seas or an EEZ and another part of the high seas or an EEZ. For the application of the regime of transit passage, two conditions must be met: geographical and functional. The geographical condition is that the strait connects one part of the high seas or an EEZ and another part of the high seas or an EEZ. The functional condition is that the strait is used for international navigation. These two criteria are taken (and adapted) from the judgment of the ICJ in the Corfu Channel case.
22 Are Straits of Malacca and Singapore straits used for international navigation? Do the Straits of Malacca and Singapore satisfy these criteria? Yes. Why? (a) Because they connect one part of the high seas, the Indian Ocean, with another part of the high seas, the South China Sea. And (b) because these Straits have been used for hundreds of years for international navigation. As the Straits of Malacca and Singapore are straits used for international navigation as defined under Article 37 of the Convention, they are subject to the transit passage regime.
23 Straits of Malacca and Singapore
24 4.2 What is transit passage? Transit passage is defined by Article 38(2) as follows: Transit passage means the exercise in accordance with this Part of the freedom of navigation and overflight solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit of the strait between one part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone and another part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone. However, the requirement of continuous and expeditious transit does not preclude passage through the strait for the purpose of entering, leaving or returning from a State bordering the strait, subject to the conditions of entry to that State.
25 The essence of transit passage The essence of transit passage is reflected in the phrase freedom of navigation solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit. Because of the phrase freedom of navigation, one might think that the passing ships can freely do anything they like. The exercise of freedom of navigation is for one purpose only that of continuous and expeditious transit. Since it is a transit through an area subject to the sovereignty of the coastal State, this freedom of navigation has to be subject to a number of limiting rules designed to protect the interests of the coastal State and promote safety of navigation.
26 Sovereignty of the strait State and the regime of transit passage Article 34(1): The regime of passage through straits used for international navigation shall not in other respects affect the legal status of the waters forming such straits or the exercise by the States bordering the straits of their sovereignty or jurisdiction over such waters and their airspace, bed and subsoil. The strait regime is without prejudice to the sovereignty or jurisdiction of strait States with respect to activities not related to passage. Article 34(2): The sovereignty or jurisdiction of the States bordering the straits is exercised subject to this Part and to other rules of international law. This paragraph 2 sets out the legal limit to sovereignty of the coastal State.
27 Transit passage: somewhere between freedom of passage and innocent passage. The foreign ships, when exercising transit passage, are not as free as when they are exercising freedoms of the high seas. On the other hand, they are freer than when they are exercising the right of innocent passage in the territorial sea of a coastal state. This new regime of transit passage, therefore, lies somewhere ( or half-way) between freedom of passage and innocent passage.
28 4.3 Duties of ships and aircraft during transit passage Under Article 39(1), while exercising the right of transit passage, ships and aircraft are required to: (a) proceed without delay through or over the strait; (b) refrain from any threat or use of force against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of States bordering the strait, or in any other manner in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the United Nations; (c) refrain from any activities other than those incident to their normal modes of continuous and expeditious transit unless rendered necessary by force majeure or by distress; (d) comply with other relevant provisions of this Part.
29 Article 39(2): Ships in transit are required to: (a) comply with generally accepted international regulations, procedures and practices for safety at sea, including the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea; (b) comply with generally accepted international regulations, procedures and practices for the prevention, reduction and control of pollution from ships. The effect of this provision is to incorporate by reference all the generally accepted international conventions: SOLAS conventions and the IMO pollution conventions would be applicable to ships in the strait.
30 Article 39(3): Aircraft in transit are required to: (a) observe the Rules of the Air established by the International Civil Aviation Organization as they apply to civil aircraft; state aircraft will normally comply with such safety measures and will at all times operate with due regard for the safety of navigation; (b) at all times monitor the radio frequency assigned by the competent internationally designated air traffic control authority or the appropriate international distress radio frequency.
31 4.4 Sea lanes and traffic separation schemes Under Article 41, the coastal States may designate sea lanes and traffic separation schemes in the strait. But two requirements must be complied with in doing so: (a) The sea lanes and traffic separation schemes must conform to generally accepted international regulations ; and (b) They must first be submitted to and adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
32 In the case of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: (a) The three Straits States, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have cooperated with one another, consulted the major user States, and submitted their proposals to the IMO. (b) IMO has adopted their proposals for deep draft vessels and VLCCs to maintain a minimum, under-keel clearance of 3,5 metres, to prescribe traffic separation schemes in 3 critical areas and to designate a deep water route in the Straits of Singapore for ships whose draught exceeds 15 metres.
33 4.5 Laws and Regulations concerning transit passage Under Article 42(1), the strait State may make laws and regulations in respect of all or any of the following: (a) the safety of navigation and the regulation of maritime traffic, as provided in article 41; (b) the prevention, reduction and control of pollution, by giving effect to applicable international regulations regarding the discharge of oil, oily wastes and other noxious substances in the strait; (c) with respect to fishing vessels, the prevention of fishing, including the stowage of fishing gear; (d) the loading or unloading of any commodity, currency or person in contravention of the customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations of States bordering straits.
34 The issue of enforcement Part III of the Convention is silent on the question of enforcement of these laws against such ships. One possibility is that the general territorial sea rules apply (by virtue of Article 34), under which enforcement should only be exercised where the good order of the territorial sea or coastal State is disturbed or competent authorities of the flag State request assistance. On the other hand, there is one provision in Part XII (Marine Environment): Article 233, expressly allowing the strait States the exercise of enforcement jurisdiction.
35 Article 233 Safeguards with respect to straits used for international navigation Nothing in sections 5, 6 and 7 affects the legal regime of straits used for international navigation. However, if a foreign ship other than those referred to in section 10 has committed a violation of the laws and regulations referred to in article 42, paragraph 1(a) and (b), causing or threatening major damage to the marine environment of the straits, the States bordering the straits may take appropriate enforcement measures
36 Statement relating to Article 233 of the convention on the law of the sea in its application to the Straits of Malacca and Singapore [29-April 1982] 1. Laws and regulations enacted by States bordering the Straits under article 42, 1 (a) of the convention, refer to laws and regulations relating to traffic separation schemes, including the determination of under keel clearance for the Straits provided in article Accordingly, a violation of the provision of resolution A.375(X),a by the IMO adopted on 14 November 1977, whereby the vessels referred to therein shall allow for an under keel clearance of at least 3.5 metres during passage through the Straits of Malacca and Singapore, shall be deemed, in view of the peculiar geographic and traffic conditions of the Straits, to be a violation within the meaning of article 233. The States bordering the Straits may take appropriate enforcement measures, as provided
37 Statement relating to Article 233 [Cont.] for in article 233. Such measures may include preventing a vessel violating the required under keel clearance from proceeding. Such action shall not constitute denying, hampering, impairing or suspending the right of transit passage in breach of articles 42, paragraph 2 or 44 of the draft convention. 3. States bordering the Straits may take appropriate enforcement measures in accordance with article 233, against vessels violating the laws and regulations referred to in article 42, paragraph 1 (a) and (6) causing or threatening major damage to the marine environment of the Straits.
38 4.6 Duties of the strait State Article 42(2): Such laws and regulations shall not discriminate in form or in fact among foreign ships or their application have the practical effect of denying, hampering or impairing the right of transit passage as defined in this section. Article 44: States bordering straits shall not hamper transit passage and shall give appropriate publicity to any danger to navigation or overflight within or over the strait of which they have knowledge. There shall be no suspension of transit passage.
39 4.7 Cooperation between straits States and user States Article 43 User States and States bordering a strait should by agreement cooperate: (a) in the establishment and maintenance in a strait of necessary navigational and safety aids or other improvements in aid of international navigation; and (b) for the prevention, reduction and control of pollution from ships.
40 Cooperation between straits States and user States [Cont.] The strait States perceive themselves as bearing the economic burdens of installing and maintaining navigational and safety aids, and enduring pollution, without receiving any corresponding benefit. They feel that the user States, which can benefit enormously by using the straits should share this economic burden with strait States. This article is not mandatory. It contains no mechanisms to compel such cooperation among User States and Straits States. It is, however, in the self-interests of both the User States and Straits States to cooperate.
41 4.8 Innocent passage and transit passage distinguished (1) Aircraft: There is no right of innocent passage for air craft but the right of transit passage is enjoyed by air craft as well as ships. (2) Submarines: Although submarines in innocent passage are required to navigate on the surface and show their flags, there is no such requirement for submarines in transit passage. (3) Nuclear powered ships: Innocent passage (Article 23) Foreign nuclear-powered ships and ships carrying nuclear or other inherently dangerous or noxious substances shall carry documents and observe special precautionary measures established for such ships by international agreements. Transit passage no special provision comparable to that.
42 Innocent passage and transit passage distinguished [Cont.] (4) Conditions relating to Sea lanes and traffic separation schemes: Innocent passage the coastal State is required simply to take into account the recommendations of competent international organizations. Transit passage the coastal State may designate and prescribe only after its proposals have been adopted by the competent international organization. (5) The conditions of transit passage (Article 39) and the subjects on which the coastal State may make laws and regulations (Article 42) are less numerous than those specified for innocent passage. (6) Cooperation between strait States and user States (article 43): There is no corresponding provision in relation to the regime of innocent passage.
43 5. Conclusion The primary legal regime for straits used for international navigation is transit passage. Transit passage is the exercise of freedom of navigation and overflight solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit of the strait. It is a compromise formula and is somewhere (half-way) between freedom of passage. and innocent passage. Despite the considerable advances the development of the transit passage regime contribute to the law of the sea, a number of practical problems remain; one example is the issue of enforcement. These problems can be resolved only by the tripartite cooperation among straits States, user States and the competent international organization (IMO).
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA Signed at Montego Bay, Jamaica, 10 December 1982 Entry into force: 16 November 1994 The States Parties to this Convention, Prompted by the desire to settle,
Page 1 Maritime Zones Act, 1999 (Act No. 2 of 1999) AN ACT to repeal the Maritime Zones Act (Cap 122) and to provide for the determination of the Maritime Zones of Seychelles in accordance with the United
42 nd Annual Conference of the Center for Oceans Law & Policy Cooperation and Engagement in the Asia Pacific Region Beijing, China, 24-26 May 2018 Panel 4: Straits Governance The Legal Regime Governing
Unit 3 (under construction) Law of the Sea Law of the Sea, branch of international law concerned with public order at sea. Much of this law is codified in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the
University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 1995 Environmental Protection in Archipelagic Waters and International Straits-The Role
Law of the Sea CDR James Kraska, JAGC, USN Howard S. Levie Chair of Operational Law Enduring Forward Presence Deterrence Sea Control Power Projection Expanding Maritime Security Humanitarian Assistance
Page 1 Maritime Areas Act of 1996 Arrangement of sections Preliminary 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Declaration of Archipelagic State. 4. Internal Waters. Declaration of Archipelagic State Internal
Romania ACT concerning the Legal Regime of the Internal Waters, the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone of Romania, 7 August 1990 * [Original: Romanian] CHAPTER I The territorial sea and the internal
United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea Geneva, Switzerland 24 February to 27 April 1958 Documents: A/CONF.13/C.1/L.52-L.85 Annexes Extract from the Official Records of the United Nations Conference
THE LEGAL REGIME OF STRAITS The right of transit passage in straits and the analogous right of archipelagic sea lanes passage in archipelagic States, negotiated in the 1970s and embodied in the 1982 UNCLOS,
Page 1 The Maritime Areas Act, 1984 Act No. 3 of 30 August 1984 AN Act to make provision with respect to the territorial sea and the continental shelf of Saint Kitts and Nevis; to establish a contiguous
Page 1 Law No. 28 (1) The President of the Republic, Pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution and the decision of the People's Assembly taken at its session held on 13 Ramadan 1424 A.H., corresponding
THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESCUE AT SEA By: Prof. Dr. Hasjim Djalal, M.A. 1. According to customary international law, the states, through the ships flying their flag, are obliged to help rescue
Page 1 Federal Law No. 19 of 1993 in respect of the delimitation of the maritime zones of the United Arab Emirates, 17 October 1993 We, Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahayyan, the President of the United Arab Emirates,
Page 1 Marine spaces Act, 1977, Act. No. 18 of 15 December 1977, as amended by the Marine Spaces (Amendment) Act 1978, Act No. 15 of 6 October 1978 PART I - PRELIMINARY Short title l. This Act may be cited
Law of the Sea Interest Group American Society of International Law Which High Seas Freedoms Apply in the Exclusive Economic Zone? * Raul Pete Pedrozo ** I. INTRODUCTION. II. COASTAL STATE RIGHTS AND JURISDICTION.
Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Revised HELCOM RECOMMENDATION 31E/5 Adopted 20 May 2010, having regard to Article 20, Paragraph 1 b) of the Helsinki Convention Revised 6 March 2014, having
HIELC 2016 Bucerius Law School Hamburg 15 April 2016 Submarine Cables & Pipelines under UNCLOS Robert Beckman Director, Centre for International Law (CIL) National University of Singapore Part 1 UNCLOS
United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea Geneva, Switzerland 24 February to 27 April 1958 Documents: A/CONF.13/C.1/L.3-L.35 Annexes Extract from the Official Records of the United Nations Conference
On Dissection of Disputes Between China and the United States over Military Activities in Exclusive Economic Zone by the Law of the Sea Jin Yongming (Institute of Law, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,
BELIZE MARITIME AREAS ACT CHAPTER 11 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of
Page 1 Grenada Territorial Waters Act, No. 17 of 1978 Short title and commencement 1. This Act may be cited as the GRENADA TERRITORIAL WATERS ACT, 1978, and shall come into force on such day as the Minister
Page 1 Federal Act relating to the Sea, 8 January 1986 The Congress of the United Mexican States decrees: TITLE I General Provisions CHAPTER I Scope of application of the Act Article 1 This Act establishes
Basic Maritime Zones Dr Sam Bateman (University of Wollongong, Australia) Scope Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone Territorial sea baselines Innocent passage Exclusive Economic Zones Rights and duties
E LEG/MISC.7 19 January 2012 IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA FOR THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION Study by the Secretariat of the International Maritime Organization
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section PART I- PRELIMINARY I. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. References to rules of international law. 4. Application of this Act. PART II THE S. Internal waters. 6. Archipelagic
This report is published and distributed by America s Survival, Inc. Cliff Kincaid, President. Kincaid@comcast.net 443-964-8208 The House of Representatives and the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea
Page 1 Territorial Waters Act, No. 1977-26(1) Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Barbados Territorial Waters Act, 1977. 2. For the purposes of this Act: Interpretation "Competent Authority" means
7 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea CONTENTS Page PREAMBLE... 21 PART I. INTRODUCTION... 22 Article 1. Use of terms and scope... 22 PART II. TERRITORIAL SEA AND CONTIGUOUS ZONE... 23 SECTION
Page 1 Maritime Areas Act, 1992 (An Act to make provision with respect to the Territorial Sea, Internal Waters and the Exclusive Economic Zone of Belize; and for matters connected therewith or incidental
Captain J. Ashley Roach, JAGC, USN (ret.) Office of the Legal Adviser U.S. Department of State (retired) Senior Visiting Scholar, CIL NUS ARF Seminar on UNCLOS Session 2.3 Manila May 28, 2014 Importance
Transit Passage Said Mahmoudi Table of Contents A. Origin of the Concept B. Development of the Concept 1. Sea-Bed Committee (1971 73) 2. UNCLOS III (1974 82) C. Transit Passage in the United Nations Convention
PROTOCOL CONCERNING COOPERATION IN PREVENTING POLLUTION FROM SHIPS AND, IN CASES OF EMERGENCY, COMBATING POLLUTION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA (Prevention and Emergency Protocol) Malta, 25 January 2002 Source:
Prepared for the IIPS Symposium on Japan s Position as a Maritime Nation 16 17 October 2007 Tokyo Session 1 Tuesday, 16 October 2007 Maintaining Maritime Security and Building a Multilateral Cooperation
The Association of the Bar of the City of New York Office of the President PRESIDENT Bettina B. Plevan (212) 382-6700 Fax: (212) 768-8116 firstname.lastname@example.org www.abcny.org September 19, 2005 Hon. Richard
World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 2000 International straits and transit passages
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA 1982 A COMMENTARY UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA 1982 A COMMENTARY Myron H. Nordquist, Editor-in-Chief Satya N. Nandan and Shabtai Rosenne,
9 th South China Sea International Conference: Cooperation for Regional Security & Development 27-28 Nov 2017, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam Session 7: Panel Discussion: Code of Conduct (COC): Substance and
TOF WHITE PAPER - SECTION re EXTENDED CONTINENTAL SHELF Introduction The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS or the Convention), which went into effect in 1994, established a comprehensive
Asian Studies Centre, St Antony s College University of Oxford China Centre 19-20 October 2017 Session V, Friday 20 th, 11.15-12.45 ASEAN & the South China Sea Disputes Robert Beckman Head, Ocean Law and
PART 1 - checklists Course breakdown 1) Nature + customary international law 2) Law of treaties + other sources of international law 3) Sovereignty and territory 4) Maritime jurisdiction 5) State responsibilities
MEMORANDUM 4 GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL MARITIME COOPERATION Introduction This document puts forward the proposed Guidelines for Regional maritime Cooperation which have been developed by the maritime Cooperation
Page 1 Act No. 68-1181 of 30 December 1968 relating to the exploration of the Continental Shelf and to the exploitation of its natural resources Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 In conformity with
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and maritime safety in the fishing sector United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) A constitution for the oceans Comprehensive legal
www.rsis.edu.sg No. 180 18 July 2016 RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical issues and contemporary developments. The
Navigation Issues in the South China Sea Candidate name: Niu Ziru Supervisor: Erik Røsæg Delivered on September 1, 2005 Number of words: 16,600 14/08/2005 Preface After the graduation from a law school
Maritime Law Agency St. Petersburg Russian Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping Russian legislation on wreck removal Alexander S. Skaridov Professor (CAPT.) Head of the International
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA By Tullio Treves Judge of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Professor at the University of Milan, Italy The United Nations Convention on
[SB. 0] A BILL FOR Maritime Zones 00 No. C [Executive] An Act to Repeal the Exclusive Economic Zone Act Cap. E LFN 00 and the Territorial Waters Act Cap. TS LPN 00 and Enact the Maritime Zones Act to Provide
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION * The Maritime Authorities of Australia 1) New Zealand 6) Canada 2) Papua New Guinea 6) Chile 3) Philippines 8) China 1) Russian
COOK ISLANDS [also in 1994 Ed.] TERRITORIAL SEA AND EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE 1977 No. 16 Title 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation ANALYSIS PART I THE TERRITORIAL SEA OF THE COOK ISLANDS 3.
Marine Pollution Act 2012 As at 6 January 2017 Long Title An Act to protect the State's marine and coastal environment from pollution by oil and certain other marine pollutants discharged from ships; to
www.maritimeissues.com The Legal Regime of Maritime Areas and the Waning Freedom of the Seas HELMUT TUERK Abstract: The principle of the freedom of the seas dates back to the early 17 th century. The balance
Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering 6 (2016) 123-128 doi 10.17265/2159-5879/2016.02.007 D DAVID PUBLISHING The Nomocracy Pursuit of the Maritime Silk Road On Legal Guarantee of State s Marine Rights
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION * The Maritime Authorities of Australia 1) New Zealand 6) Canada 2) Papua New Guinea 6) Chile 3) Peru 9) China 1) Philippines
CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA HELSINKI COMMISSION - Baltic Marine HELCOM EXTRA 2001 Environment Protection Commission Minutes of the Meeting Extraordinary
SHIPPING (MARPOL) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2012 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2013 This is a revised edition of the law Shipping (MARPOL) (Jersey) Regulations 2012 Arrangement SHIPPING (MARPOL)
Prof T Ikeshima LLB, LLM, DES, PhD 03/06/2016 Session 1 (Ikeshima) 1 Outline Arctic coastal states and the Arctic Ocean Russia The law of the sea as applicable law in the NSR Some legal issues under the
South China Sea: Realpolitik Trumps International Law Emeritus Professor Carlyle A. Thayer Presentation to East Asian Economy and Society, Institut für Ostasienwissenschaften Universität Wien Vienna, November
CSCAP WORKSHOP ON UNCLOS AND MARITIME SECURITY IN EAST ASIA MANILA, MAY 27, 2014 SECTION 3: UNCLOS AND PRESERVATION OF MARINE ENVIRONMENT Promoting Cooperation through UNCLOS General principles in Part
University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2000 Transit of Straits and Archipelagic Waters by Military Aircraft Bernard Oxman University
Possible ways to highlight to the international community the need for a new instrument regulating the laying and protection of submarine cables Mechanisms available to States Universal organizations UN
Thailand s Contribution to the Regional Security By Captain Chusak Chupaitoon Introduction The 9/11 incident and the bombing at Bali on 12 October 2002 shook the world community and sharpened it with the
The Marine Environment, Marine Living Resources and Marine Biodiversity International Environmental Law JUS 5520 Dina Townsend email@example.com Pacific Fur Seal Case 1 Regulating the marine environment
Commandant United States Coast Guard 2100 Second Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20593-0001 Staff Symbol: CG-0921 Phone: (202) 372-3500 FAX: (202) 372-2311 TESTIMONY OF ADMIRAL ROBERT PAPP COMMANDANT, U.S.
Page 1 Marine Boundaries and Jurisdiction Act, 1978-3, 25 February 1978 An Act to provide for the establishment of Marine Boundaries and Jurisdiction. Commencement (By Proclamation) ENACTED by the Parliament
A 639 I assent. (L.S.) MARIE LOUISE COLEIRO PRECA President 8th August, 2014 ACT No. XXVIII of 2014 AN ACT to make provision as to the exploration and exploitation of the continental shelf and for matters
By Invitation Small countries must be self-reliant Tommy Koh Ambassador-At-Large at Singapore s Ministry of Foreign Affairs PUBLISHED 4 JULY 2017, THE STRAITS TIMES This is another view of the Qatar crisis
Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.06.2011 In force until: 31.12.2014 Translation published: 02.07.2014 Amended by the following acts Passed 28.01.1993 RT 1993, 7, 105 Entry into force 19.02.1993
The Legitimacy of Unilateral Actions to Protest the Ocean Shipment of Ultrahazardous Radioactive Materials by Professor Jon M. Van Dyke William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawai'i at Manoa
Maritime Security in Southeast Asia: Maritime Governance Session 3 Provisional Arrangements of a Practical Nature: Problems and Prospects in Southeast Asia Tara Davenport Research Fellow Centre for International
STATE OBLIGATIONS RELATING TO RESCUE AT SEA BOOKLET FOR THE CIVIL SOCIETY 2018 Rescue and assistance at sea Assistance to persons in distress at sea Shipwrecked persons Coordination of rescue operations
30.9.2005 L 255/11 DIRECTIVE 2005/35/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 7 September 2005 on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT
A - STATES AND ORGANIZATIONS Home click here 1 - STATES AND STATES ARTIES Every state acknowledged as such by the community of nations (about 160) can become a party to the 1982 Convention by ratification
Guidelines for Navigation and Overflight in the Exclusive Economic Zone EEZ Group 21 26 September,2005 Tokyo, Japan Ocean Policy Research Foundation This project was sponsored primarily by the Ocean Policy
Unofficial translation Finnish Maritime Administration Decree on Marine Equipment (925/1998; amendments up to 528/2004 included) Section 1 Scope of application (1) This Decree applies to marine equipment
Areas of Marine Jurisdiction Review & Update on the Legal Framework Influencing Submarine Telecommunications Marine Activities Professor Robert Beckman Director, Centre of International Law, University
Section Pollution of Waters by Oil and Noxious Substances (Amendment) Act 1991 1. Purpose 2. Commencement No. 46 of 1991 TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 AMENMENT OF POLLUTION OF WATERS BY
THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION 2012 Tokyo Plenary Meeting Okura Hotel, 21-22 April 2012 EAST ASIA I: GEOPOLITICS OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA SATURDAY 21 APRIL 2012, ASCOT HALL, B2F, SOUTH WING Geopolitics, International
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SHIPPING LAWS AMENDMENT ACT REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA WYSIGINGSWET OP SKEEPVAARTWETTE No, 1998 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA BR 17 / 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Citation Transitional provisions Interpretation Ambulatory reference Application Exemptions
INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA STATEMENT BY H.E. JUDGE VLADIMIR GOLITSYN PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA ON AGENDA ITEM 79 (a) OCEANS AND THE LAW OF THE SEA
Yale Journal of International Law Volume 2 Issue 2 Yale Studies in World Order Article 2 1976 Contemporary Law of the Sea: Transportation, Communication and Flight William T. Burke Follow this and additional
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 22 September 2008 (OR. en) 12083/08 Interinstitutional File: 2007/0223 (CNS) PECHE 204 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: COUNCIL REGULATION establishing