Comm n on Human Rights v. Aksoy OATH Index No. 1617/15 (Aug. 24, 2015), rejected, Comm n Dec. & Order (June 21, 2017), appended
|
|
- Muriel Little
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Comm n on Human Rights v. Aksoy OATH Index No. 1617/15 (Aug. 24, 2015), rejected, Comm n Dec. & Order (June 21, 2017), appended Evidence established that respondent violated New York City s Human Rights Law by posting an advertisement on Craigslist for Eastern European waitresses and a female bartender/phone person. Civil penalty of $5,000 and affirmative relief recommended. Commission dismissed the charges, finding that petitioner failed to prove that the restaurant was an employer with four or more employees covered by the Human Rights Law. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Petitioner - against - AYHAN AKSOY a/k/a JOHN AKSOY 1 Respondent KEVIN F. CASEY, Administrative Law Judge REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner, the New York City Commission on Human Rights ( Commission ), brought this action against respondent, Ayhan Aksoy a/k/a John Aksoy, under section 8-109(c) of the New York City Administrative Code ( Human Rights Law ), alleging that respondent discriminated based on gender and national origin by circulating an employment advertisement for Eastern European waitresses and a female bartender/phone person on Craigslist, in violation of section 8-107(1)(d) of the Human Rights Law. Admin. Code 8-107(1)(d) (Lexis 2015). In a Verified Answer and Position Statement ( Resp. Ans. ), respondent admitted that 1 The caption has been amended to reflect that there is only one respondent. In the complaint, petitioner referred to Ayhan Aksoy and John Aksoy as respondents. In his answer, respondent asserted that he occasionally refers to himself as John Aksoy, the English version of his name, and he does not know anybody else named John Aksoy (ALJ Ex. 1). In subsequent correspondence and a motion to compel, petitioner referred to respondent as Ayhan Aksoy a/k/a John Aksoy.
2 - 2 - he posted the advertisement (Pet. Ex. 6). However, he stated that he unwittingly used a poor choice of words, he lacked any intent to discriminate, he was not an employer, and he only posted the advertisement as a favor for a friend (Resp. Ans. at 3-4). Trial was initially adjourned at petitioner s request to accommodate a witness s schedule and was later adjourned at respondent s request to give him an opportunity to retain or consult with counsel (Tr. 4). At trial on August 7, 2015, petitioner relied on testimony from one of its employees and respondent, and offered documentary evidence. Respondent testified in his own behalf and also offered documentary evidence. For the reasons set forth below, I find that petitioner proved that respondent violated section 8-107(1)(d) of the Human Rights Law and recommend a $5,000 civil penalty with other affirmative relief. ANALYSIS At the outset of trial, petitioner was permitted to amend the complaint, over respondent s objection, to allege that respondent was an employer or agent thereof rather than an employer (Tr. 5). Absent prejudice to the parties, the rules of the Commission and this tribunal allow for amendment of the pleadings. See 47 RCNY 1-13; 48 RCNY There was no undue prejudice here. Though respondent denied that he was an agent for the restaurant, the admissions contained in his answer suggested otherwise (Resp. Ans. at 3-4). See, e.g., Dep t of Transportation v. McKoy, OATH Index No. 199/98, at 5-6 n.1 (Jan. 9, 1998) (charges amended to conform to the proof where there was no prejudice to respondent). During trial, Ms. Canales, a tester employed by petitioner, credibly testified that she saw an advertisement on Craigslist seeking 2 full-time Eastern European waitresses and a female bartender/phone person for night shifts at busy, upscale family-owned restaurant on Manhattan s Upper East Side (Tr ; Pet. Ex. 1). Ms. Canales replied to the advertisement by sending two s with similar resumes. One was from a female applicant and the other was from a male applicant (Tr. 17; Pet. Exs. 2, 3). The s were sent with a feature notifying Ms. Canales when each was opened (Tr. 20). According to Ms. Canales, the female applicant s was opened but the male applicant s was not (Tr. 20; Pet. Ex. 4). In
3 - 3 - response to a subpoena, Craigslist later informed petitioner that respondent paid for the advertisement with his credit card (Pet. Ex. 5). In his answer and testimony, respondent explained why he posted the advertisement (Ans. 3-4; Tr. 27). He recalled meeting with a friend, whose first name was Sadrjoun, in a Turkish restaurant on 14th Street in Manhattan (Tr. 48). They were casual acquaintances who had previously met a handful or a dozen times (Tr. 47; Resp. Ans. at 3). Sadrjoun mentioned that he was recently hired as the manager of a different restaurant on the Upper East Side and they were short-staffed (Tr. 41). Respondent, who was out of work at the time, offered to post an advertisement for Sadrjoun as a favor (Tr , 28; Resp. Ans. at 4). Respondent quickly wrote the advertisement and posted it on Craigslist (Tr. 27; Resp. Ex. A). Shortly afterwards, Sadrjoun met respondent and told him that he could not find the advertisement on Craigslist (Tr , 31). Respondent re-posted the advertisement, which was found by petitioner (Tr. 29). According to respondent, he received 15 to 30 s in response to the advertisement and he forwarded all of them to Sadrjoun (Tr. 41, 68-69). Respondent opened the first few and quickly looked to see if they were females who spoke Russian (Tr. 41, 49, 62). Section 8-107(1)(d) of the Human Rights Law provides that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer or agent thereof to circulate any employment advertisement which expresses, directly or indirectly, any limitation, specification or discrimination regarding national origin or gender. This provision applies to employers with four or more employees. Admin. Code 8-102(5). Here, the credible evidence established that, on behalf of a restaurant, respondent posted an employment advertisement which expressed a preference based on gender and national origin. See Comm'n on Human Rights v. Shalom Bombay 2, LLC, OATH Index No. 544/15 at 2 (Apr. 23, 2015) (finding that advertisement for Indian waiter or waitress discriminated based on national origin); Comm'n on Human Rights v. Rozario, OATH Index No. 1273/15 at 4 (June 3, 2015) (finding that advertisement for waitress discriminated based on gender). It can be inferred from the evidence that the restaurant had at least four employees. According to the advertisement, the restaurant was very busy and seeking to hire three workers (Pet. Ex. 1). Respondent claimed that Sadrjoun was the restaurant manager who wanted to hire more females because the current employees were predominantly male (Tr. 10, 72; Resp. Ans. at 4). Because
4 - 4 - respondent claimed that he could no longer recall the restaurant s name, not much is known about the restaurant or its total number of employees. However, based on the nature of the business, the text of the advertisement, and respondent s statements, it appears that Sadrjoun, the restaurant manager, had at least three co-workers. The evidence also showed that respondent acted as Sadrjoun s agent. By his own admission, respondent wrote the advertisement at Sadrjoun s behest, posted it on the internet, reposted it, and was reimbursed for expenses. He forwarded 15 to 30 responses to Sadrjoun and took the time to check some of the responses to see if they were from qualified applicants. Those were the acts of an agent. See Restatement (Third) of Agency 1 (2006) ( Agency is the fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (a "principal") manifests assent to another person (an "agent") that the agent shall act on the principal's behalf and subject to the principal's control, and the agent manifests assent or otherwise consents so to act ). Respondent offered a variety of defenses to the charges. For example, he claimed that he wrote the advertisement in haste and the wording was ill-advised due to his poor language skills (Tr. 59, 63). He also claimed that the advertisement specified Eastern European waitresses, because most of the restaurant s employees were men and the manager wanted more diversity, some conservative or religious female customers were not comfortable being served by men, and many customers spoke Russian (Tr. 72; Resp. Ans. at 4). These inconsistent and unsupported claims do not withstand scrutiny. In general, I found respondent s testimony to be unpersuasive. I was not convinced by his claims that he did not recall Sadrjoun s last name, he did not know the name of the restaurant that Sadrjoun managed, and he no longer had Sadrjoun s address (Tr. 60). Respondent argued that there was nothing unusual about not knowing the full names of people we do business with in New York City. He noted, for example, that he had been going to the same pizzeria for seven years and did not know the owner s full name (Tr. 57). But that analogy is inapt. It is one thing to not know the last name of a local pizzeria owner; it is quite another thing to forget the name of the pizzeria. It was similarly difficult to believe respondent s claim that his inbox, outbox, and contacts list had no trace of Sadrjoun s address, even though respondent had received 15 to 30 s on Sadrjoun s behalf and forwarded them to him in the past year.
5 - 5 - Respondent s suggestion that he wrote the advertisement in haste is inconsistent with his assertion that he took the time to ask Sadrjoun about his ideal candidate, that he tailored the advertisement based on the manager s needs, and that he re-posted the advertisement (Resp. Ans. at 4). Similarly, respondent s suggestion that he lacked fluency in English was not credible. He was very well-spoken when he testified. Although Turkish is his native language, he has been speaking English for 15 to 20 years (Tr. 63). Moreover, he recently graduated with honors from a local college with a degree in computer science and he plans to attend graduate school (Tr. 56, 64-65). Based on respondent s testimony and his background, it appears that respondent knew exactly what he was doing when he posted an advertisement for Eastern European waitresses. He was carrying out Sadrjoun s wishes and discriminating based on gender and national origin. The evidence that respondent opened the response from the female applicant, and did not open the from the male applicant, further demonstrated that he engaged in improper discrimination and violated section 8-107(1)(d) of the Human Rights Law. On this point, respondent again offered inconsistent and unpersuasive testimony. He initially claimed that he was checking the responses to see if the applicant had the necessary qualifications but later claimed that he was simply acting out of curiosity (Tr. 49, 63). Finally, it does not matter that respondent did not make the final hiring decision. Posting the advertisement, by itself, was improper discrimination. See Comm n on Human Rights v. Crazy Asylum, LLC, OATH Index Nos. 2262/13, 2263/13 & 2264/13 at 6 (Jan. 30, 2014) ( The plain language of the Human Rights law, making it a violation to post a gender-specific job advertisement, demands a finding of discrimination based on the advertisement alone ). The charges should be sustained. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Petitioner established that respondent acted as an agent of an employer, as defined by section of the Human Rights Law. 2. Petitioner proved that respondent placed an advertisement for employment which expressed a limitation as to gender and national origin, in violation of section 8-107(1)(d) of the Human Rights Law.
6 - 6 - RECOMMENDATION Petitioner seeks a civil penalty of $15,000 due to respondent s lack of candor and the fact that he discriminated in two different ways, based on national origin and gender (Tr ). Respondent argued that such a penalty would be excessive in light of his limited resources, his minimal connection to the restaurant, and lesser penalties imposed on other parties who have defaulted in other cases (Tr. 75). For the proven charge, petitioner may impose a civil penalty of up to $125,000 to vindicate the public interest. Admin. Code 8-126(a). Recent civil penalties, following trial, under the City s Human Rights law generally range from $5,000 to $15,000. See, e.g., Rozario, OATH 1273/15 at 5 ($5,000 penalty recommended for restaurant that posted an advertisement on Craigslist for a waitress ); Shalom Bombay 2, LLC, OATH 544/15 at 3 ($5,000 civil penalty recommended for restaurant that placed Craigslist advertisement for an experienced Indian waiter or waitress ); Crazy Asylum, LLC, OATH 2262/13 at 7 ($5,000 civil penalty and affirmative relief recommended on summary judgment granted in favor of petitioner where respondents posted Craigslist advertisement for waitresses ); Comm n on Human Rights v. Cu29 Copper Restaurant & Bar, OATH Index No. 647/15 at 5 (Apr. 7, 2015) ($7,500 civil penalty and affirmative relief for restaurant that advertised for female bartender and pizza man ); Comm n on Human Rights v. Frambiose Pastry, Inc., OATH Index Nos. 727/13 & 728/13 (May 3, 2013), adopted, Comm n Dec. & Order (Sept. 25, 2013) (civil penalty of $15,000 and affirmative relief recommended where respondents discriminated based on gender and race, by posting an advertisement for a counter girl and refusing to hire an applicant because she was black). Cases at the higher end of the range involve additional acts of discrimination beyond placement of a single discriminatory advertisement. Relevant considerations include the egregiousness of the discrimination, the potential impact on the public, previous findings of discrimination against the respondent, and the degree to which the respondent cooperated with petitioner s investigation. Cu29 Copper Restaurant & Bar, OATH 647/15 at 4-5 (citing East 97th St. Corp. v. NYC Comm n on Human Rights, 220 A.D.2d 79, (1st Dep t 1996)); Comm n on Human Rights v. Jenkins, OATH Index No.
7 /13 at 8 (Dec. 18, 2013), adopted, Comm n Dec. & Order (April 14, 2014) (enhancing penalty in default proceeding because of respondent s total lack of cooperation and downright disdain by hanging up the phone on the Commission investigator several times ). Where respondents accept responsibility for posting discriminatory advertisements and take corrective action, lesser penalties are appropriate. See Settlements, NYC Commission on Human Rights (2014) (listing 20 cases in 2014 where employers agreed to pay civil penalties of $2,500 for posting discriminatory advertisement declaring a preference for female applicants). A $5,000 civil penalty is appropriate here. Respondent does not appear to be the owner, operator, or employee of a restaurant. The evidence tended to show that this was an isolated episode where he posted an advertisement for someone else. Though the advertisement cited by petitioner violated the Human Rights Law in two different ways, discriminating based on gender and national origin, it involved a single act by respondent. And respondent correctly noted that other parties who have committed similar acts and failed to cooperate have received penalties far below the $15,000 that petitioner now seeks. The facts of this case are closer to Rozario, Shalom Bombay 2, LLC, and Crazy Asylum, LLC, where $5,000 civil penalties were recommended for restaurants that posted discriminatory advertisements on Craigslist, than to Cu29 Copper Restaurant & Bar, cited by respondent, where a $7,500 penalty was recommended. In Cu29 Copper Restaurant & Bar, an employer posted an advertisement containing dual violations of the Human Rights Law, seeking a female bartender and a pizza man. OATH 647/15 at 4. But there is an important difference. There, respondents failure to cooperate and provide discovery and their failure to appear for the trial and second conference were deemed aggravating factors because it is in the public interest to have individuals respond and participate in a process designed to cure discriminatory practices.... Id. at 5, citing Comm n on Human Rights v. Chae Choe, OATH Index No. 2617/09 at 9 (Sept. 25, 2009), adopted, Comm n Dec. & Order (Dec. 10, 2009). Here, respondent could have been more forthcoming, but he did not refuse to cooperate. He submitted a detailed answer, participated in conferences, and took an active role at trial. Accordingly, I recommend imposition of a $5,000 civil penalty and the affirmative relief of requiring respondent to undergo anti-discrimination training. See Admin. Code 8-120(a)
8 - 8 - (authorizing the Commission to require respondent to take affirmative action to effectuate the purpose of the City s Human Rights Law). August 24, 2015 Kevin F. Casey Administrative Law Judge SUBMITTED TO: CARMELYN P. MALALIS Commissioner APPEARANCES: ELIZABETH OSLEY, ESQ. Attorney for Petitioner AYHAN AKSOY Respondent
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Business Integrity Comm n v. Freire OATH Index No. 1600/13 (Apr. 10, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9511
Business Integrity Comm n v. Freire OATH Index No. 1600/13 (Apr. 10, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9511 At a default hearing, evidence failed to establish that respondent was a business operating for the purpose
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Comm n on Human Rights v. Tantillo OATH Index Nos. 105/11, 106/11 & 107/11 (Feb. 24, 2011), modified on penalty, Comm n Dec. & Order (May 23, 2011), appended In default proceeding, petitioner established
More informationComm n on Human Rights ex rel. Thomas v. Mutual Apartments Inc. OATH Index No. 2399/14, mem. dec. (Sept. 2, 2014)
Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Thomas v. Mutual Apartments Inc. OATH Index No. 2399/14, mem. dec. (Sept. 2, 2014) Petitioner s motion to compel discovery is denied as it requested information about accommodation
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Hidalgo v. Ditmas Park Rehabilitation and Care Center, LLC OATH Index Nos. 2415/13, 2416/13, & 2417/13, mem. dec. (Sept. 25, 2013) Respondents who failed to timely submit
More informationConflicts of Interest Bd. v. Hawkins OATH Index No. 1043/16 (Apr. 19, 2016), adopted, Bd. Dec. (Sept. 22, 2016), appended
Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Hawkins OATH Index No. 1043/16 (Apr. 19, 2016), adopted, Bd. Dec. (Sept. 22, 2016), appended Respondent, a NYCHA property maintenance supervisor, violated New York City Charter
More informationTaxi & Limousine Comm n v. Khouma OATH Index No. 2550/15 (July 2, 2015), adopted, Dep. Comm r Dec. (July 23, 2015), appended
Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Khouma OATH Index No. 2550/15 (July 2, 2015), adopted, Dep. Comm r Dec. (July 23, 2015), appended At summary suspension hearing, petitioner established that respondent taxicab
More informationPetition seeking compensation for alleged unpaid work denied. Claim dismissed as untimely. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Start Elevator, Inc. v. Dep t. of Correction OATH Index No. 1160/11, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2011), aff d, Index No. 104620/11 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. Jan. 9, 2012), appended, aff d, 104 A.D.3d 488 (1 st Dep t
More informationBusiness Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9332
Business Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9332 In a default hearing, the proof failed to establish that landscaper with dirt
More informationComm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014)
Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014) At a default hearing, petitioner established that respondent s employee discriminated against complainant
More informationPolice Dep't v. Davis OATH Index No. 1297/15, mem. dec. (Dec. 26, 2014)
Police Dep't v. Davis OATH Index No. 1297/15, mem. dec. (Dec. 26, 2014) Respondent s motion to dismiss petition granted where petitioner failed to serve respondent with notice of right to request retention
More informationDell-Tech Enterprises, Inc. v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 410/16, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2016)
Dell-Tech Enterprises, Inc. v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 410/16, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2016) Contractor s petition for additional payment dismissed because it was untimely and waived. NEW
More informationComm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 20, 2016), appended
Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 20, 2016), appended At a default hearing, petitioner established that respondent
More informationPerfetto Enterprises v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1646/15, mem. dec. (June 11, 2015)
Perfetto Enterprises v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1646/15, mem. dec. (June 11, 2015) Petition seeking additional payment for asphalt work denied because claim was untimely, waived, and
More informationFire Dep t v. Harper OATH Index No. 503/14, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2014)
Fire Dep t v. Harper OATH Index No. 503/14, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2014) Employee s application for stay based on pendency of state proceeding is denied. Application for discovery and to compel petitioner
More informationOffice of the City Clerk v. Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty OATH Index No. 1940/12, mem. dec. (Aug.
Office of the City Clerk v. Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty OATH Index No. 1940/12, mem. dec. (Aug. 30, 2012) Respondent s motion to dismiss for untimeliness denied as the
More informationDep't of Buildings v. Mascarella OATH Index No. 2757/10 (Dec. 22, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec (Jan. 5, 2011), appended
Dep't of Buildings v. Mascarella OATH Index No. 2757/10 (Dec. 22, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec (Jan. 5, 2011), appended Respondent, a licensed hoist machine operator, pled guilty to conspiracy
More informationHealth and Hospitals Corp. (Harlem Hospital Center) v. Norwood OATH Index No. 143/05, mem. dec. (June 20, 2005)
Health and Hospitals Corp. (Harlem Hospital Center) v. Norwood OATH Index No. 143/05, mem. dec. (June 20, 2005) Petitioner's post-report and recommendation motion to reopen the record to submit new evidence
More informationFire Dep't v. Domini OATH Index No. 2047/11, mem. dec. (July 28, 2011)
Fire Dep't v. Domini OATH Index No. 2047/11, mem. dec. (July 28, 2011) Respondent s motion to dismiss, on the basis of defective pleadings or until a related matter is determined in federal district court,
More informationTaxi and Limousine Comm n v. Manawar OATH Index No. 169/11 (Aug. 13, 2010)
Taxi and Limousine Comm n v. Manawar OATH Index No. 169/11 (Aug. 13, 2010) In a default proceeding, petitioner proved that a taxicab driver overcharged passengers on 350 occasions. ALJ recommended revocation
More informationComm n on Human Rights ex rel. Joo v. UBM Building Maintenance Inc. OATH Index No. 384/16 (Mar. 25, 2016)
Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Joo v. UBM Building Maintenance Inc. OATH Index No. 384/16 (Mar. 25, 2016) After a default trial, ALJ held that a maintenance company discriminated against a security officer
More informationCommissioner determined licensee s conduct was sufficiently serious to warrant license revocation and he imposed that penalty.
Dep't of Buildings v. Inglese OATH Index No. 929/10 (Feb. 4, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 23, 2010), appended, remanded sub nom Inglese v. LiMandri, 2010 NY Slip Op 32967U; 2010 N.Y. Misc.
More informationAdmin. for Children s Services v. Hane OATH Index No. 1460/14 (Aug. 27, 2014)
Admin. for Children s Services v. Hane OATH Index No. 1460/14 (Aug. 27, 2014) Petitioner proved that respondent, a research assistant, committed the crimes of assault, resisting arrest, intentional property
More informationDep t of Buildings v. 74 Targee Street, Staten Island OATH Index No. 1302/09 (May 27, 2009)
Dep t of Buildings v. 74 Targee Street, Staten Island OATH Index No. 1302/09 (May 27, 2009) Petitioner established that the premises is being used for an impermissible commercial use. Respondents failed
More informationTHE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : Index No. Petitioner, : 151/94
THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : Index No. Petitioner,
More informationDep t of Probation v. Dixon OATH Index No. 156/11 (Nov. 30, 2010)
Dep t of Probation v. Dixon OATH Index No. 156/11 (Nov. 30, 2010) Petitioner demonstrated that probation officer engaged in a confrontation with police officers, acted in a manner to discredit the agency,
More informationHuman Resources Admin. v. Cornelius OATH Index No. 2041/13 (July 10, 2013)
Human Resources Admin. v. Cornelius OATH Index No. 2041/13 (July 10, 2013) Undisputed evidence established that respondent was continuously absent without leave (AWOL) for more than a year, from January
More informationSkyline Credit Ride, Inc. v. Board of Elections OATH Index No. 878/12, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2012)
Skyline Credit Ride, Inc. v. Board of Elections OATH Index No. 878/12, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2012) Petition dismissed as untimely. The petitioner was late in submitting its Notice of Claim to the Comptroller.
More informationDep t of Environmental Protection v. Donas OATH Index No. 781/09 (Feb. 13, 2009), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No, CD SA (Nov.
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Donas OATH Index No. 781/09 (Feb. 13, 2009), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No, CD 09-70- SA (Nov. 12, 2009) Respondent used Department s e-mail in violation of
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL NASD DECISION
BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL NASD In the Matter of Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs. DECISION Complaint No. C07040077 Dated: December 12, 2005 Dulce Maria Salaverria, Maracaibo, Venezuela,
More informationTaxi & Limousine Comm n v. Crow-Martinez OATH Index No. 0084/18 (Aug. 18, 2017)*
Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Crow-Martinez OATH Index No. 0084/18 (Aug. 18, 2017)* Following respondent s arrest for unlawfully soliciting ground transportation services at an airport, petitioner suspended
More informationDep't of Buildings v. 67 Greenwich Street, New York County OATH Index No. 1666/09 (Apr. 10, 2009)
Dep't of Buildings v. 67 Greenwich Street, New York County OATH Index No. 1666/09 (Apr. 10, 2009) Undisputed evidence at zoning violation proceeding established that property was being used for impermissible
More informationDep t of Correction v. LaSonde OATH Index No. 2526/11 (Aug. 18, 2011)
Dep t of Correction v. LaSonde OATH Index No. 2526/11 (Aug. 18, 2011) Correction officer refused to answer questions in MEO-16 interview. Termination from employment recommended. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF
More informationFire Dep t v. Buttaro OATH Index No. 2430/14, mem. dec. (July 17, 2014)
Fire Dep t v. Buttaro OATH Index No. 2430/14, mem. dec. (July 17, 2014) Respondent s motion to dismiss is denied in part and denied in part with leave to renew. Respondent s motions to preclude interview
More informationPrismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 1239/16, mem. dec. (June 30, 2016)
Prismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 1239/16, mem. dec. (June 30, 2016) General contractor sought extra compensation for costs to install devices that it furnished under the
More informationORDER REGARDING AMENDED PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE STATEMENT OF SUFFICIENCY PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF C.R.S
DISTRICT COURT, PUEBLO COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, 501 North Elizabeth Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003 PLAINTIFF: Terry A. Hart, v. DEFENDANT: Gilbert Ortiz, Pueblo County Clerk and Recorder, COURT USE ONLY
More informationDep t of Buildings v. 120 St. Marks Place, Manhattan OATH Index No. 648/09 (Apr. 27, 2009), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 30, 2009), appended
Dep t of Buildings v. 120 St. Marks Place, Manhattan OATH Index No. 648/09 (Apr. 27, 2009), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 30, 2009), appended Petitioner established that the premises are being used for an
More informationCDRB determined that contractor waived its claim regarding its contractual responsibility for wiring installation. Appeal denied.
Summit Construction Services Group, Inc. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 456/15, mem. dec. (Jan. 26, 2015), aff d, Index No. 155253/2015 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. Aug. 20, 2015), appended CDRB
More informationLiRo/HAKS, J.V. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 1466/14, mem. dec. (Mar. 31, 2014)
LiRo/HAKS, J.V. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 1466/14, mem. dec. (Mar. 31, 2014) Petition requesting additional compensation for electrical work dismissed as time-barred. NEW YORK CITY
More informationComm n on Human Rights ex. rel. Blue v. Jovic OATH Index No. 1624/16 (Aug. 19, 2016), adopted, Comm n Dec. & Order (May 26, 2017)
Comm n on Human Rights ex. rel. Blue v. Jovic OATH Index No. 1624/16 (Aug. 19, 2016), adopted, Comm n Dec. & Order (May 26, 2017) After a default hearing, ALJ held that a landlord discriminated against
More informationCALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions
Page 1 Chapter 1. General Provisions Cal Rules of Court, Rule 3.800 (2009) Rule 3.800. Definitions As used in this division: (1) "Alternative dispute resolution process" or "ADR process" means a process,
More informationResPondent was admitted to the New Jersey bar in 1983 and has been in private practice in Lake Hiawatha, Morris County.
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. 95-166 IN THE MATTER "OF RICHARD ONOREVOLE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Argued: September 20, 1995 Decision of the Disciplinary Review Board Decided:
More informationPolice Dep t v. Nightstar OATH Index No. 3190/09, mem. dec. (June 19, 2009)
Police Dep t v. Nightstar OATH Index No. 3190/09, mem. dec. (June 19, 2009) In vehicle forfeiture proceeding, ALJ found that petitioner proved that owner was not innocent and that the other Krimstock elements
More informationBAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS 1 BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS Rule 1. Purpose of Rules. The purpose of these rules
More informationTaxi & Limousine Comm n v. Behar OATH Index No. 0076/17 (Oct. 14, 2016)
Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Behar OATH Index No. 0076/17 (Oct. 14, 2016) In a discretionary revocation proceeding, petitioner proved that taxi driver harassed a passenger by exiting his taxicab and pursuing
More informationCASE 0:17-cr DWF-TNL Document 1009 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 10
CASE 0:17-cr-00107-DWF-TNL Document 1009 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 10 United States of America, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No.: 17-CR-107 (16) DWF/TNL Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM
More informationTHE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Subject: Date / Time: Opportunity to comment on proposed amendment to the Rules Relating to Parking Violations December 19, 2011 at 11:00am
More informationTenesela v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn NY Slip Op 33355(U) December 2, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10
Tenesela v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn. 2010 NY Slip Op 33355(U) December 2, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 108805/10 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Republished from New York State
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION. v. Case No. 4:07-cv-279
Rangel v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services Dallas District et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JUAN C. RANGEL, Petitioner, v. Case
More informationTaxi & Limousine Comm n v. Kowal OATH Index No. 1614/10 (Mar. 16, 2010), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD A (May 4, 2011), appended
Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Kowal OATH Index No. 1614/10 (Mar. 16, 2010), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD 11-26-A (May 4, 2011), appended Inspector unnecessarily engaged an irate taxi driver and
More informationNFA Arbitration: Resolving Customer Disputes
NFA Arbitration: Resolving Customer Disputes Contents Why arbitration? 2 What does it cost to arbitrate? 4 What is NFA Arbitration? 6 Glossary of terms 17 National Futures Association (NFA) is a self-regulatory
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3 1
Article 3. Administrative Hearings. 150B-22. Settlement; contested case. It is the policy of this State that any dispute between an agency and another person that involves the person's rights, duties,
More informationDep t of Buildings v. Manchester OATH Index No. 467/15 (Jan. 28, 2015)
Dep t of Buildings v. Manchester OATH Index No. 467/15 (Jan. 28, 2015) Hoist machine operator, whose driver s license was revoked upon his conviction for driving while intoxicated, failed to maintain a
More informationPolice Dep t v. Jaber OATH Index No. 2415/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009)
Police Dep t v. Jaber OATH Index No. 2415/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009) Vehicle was seized as the instrumentality of a crime in connection with driver's arrest for selling counterfeit merchandise. Petitioner
More informationREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. McIntosh v. Vance OATH Index Nos. 2018/11 & 2019/11 (July 18, 2011), adopted, Comm n Dec. & Order (Nov. 9, 2011), appended Petitioner established that respondents discriminated
More informationRULE 24. Compulsory arbitration
RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration (A) Cases for arbitration (1) Any judge of the general division of the Court of Common Pleas may at the case management conference or thereafter order and schedule, by entry,
More informationDep t of Correction v. Blount OATH Index No. 142/12 (Feb. 6, 2012), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Mar. 22, 2012), appended
Dep t of Correction v. Blount OATH Index No. 142/12 (Feb. 6, 2012), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Mar. 22, 2012), appended Correction officer found guilty of bringing a Nook Wi-Fi Reader into a prohibited
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-02-13 PROCEDURES FOR PENALTY ASSESSMENTS AND HEARING TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-02-13-.01 Scope
More informationSt George Warehouse v. NLRB
2005 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-23-2005 St George Warehouse v. NLRB Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-2893 Follow this and
More informationRULES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE (ALL CAMPUSES)
RULES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE (ALL CAMPUSES) CHAPTER 1720-1-5 PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING HEARINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTESTED CASE PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM TABLE OF CONTENTS 1720-1-5-.01 Hearings
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION CHAPTER 1360-04-01 UNIFORM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR HEARING CONTESTED CASES BEFORE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger
Case No. 999-cv-99999-MSK-XXX JANE ROE, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger v. Plaintiff, SMITH CORP., and JACK SMITH, Defendants. SAMPLE SUMMARY
More informationLEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007
LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 COMMUNICATIONS For questions concerning general calendar matters, call the Deputy Clerk, Mr. Andrew
More informationIN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL P. SKELLY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 93-016 IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL P. SKELLY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board Argued: February
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NEWJERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket Nos and IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY F. CARRACINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
SUPREME COURT OF NEWJERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket Nos. 94-393 and 95-076 IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY F. CARRACINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Argued: April 19, 1995 Decided: August Ii, 1995 Decision of
More informationt! CAUSE NO ORIGINAL PETITION FOR MANDAMUS RELIEF
RUSSELL CASEY, vs. TIM O'HARE, PETITIONER, RESPONDENT. 067 297127 t! CAUSE NO. ------- "3 ---. c:::, os ~ ui..:... i -1 > :z: :.'..! tr. I 0 -t J:*,;., N IN THE DISTRI{ff,.COUWf m :::.:: ::i:: ~;:::: -
More informationU.S. Bank Nat l Ass n v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Index No /2011 Page 2 of 12
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: IAS PART THREE --------------------------------------------------------------------X U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, for HarborView
More informationAttorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters
Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Code of Civil Procedure 1985.8 Subpoena seeking electronically stored information (a)(1) A subpoena in a civil proceeding may require
More information3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16
3:05-cv-02858-MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION United States of America, ex rel. ) Michael
More informationCarreras v. Dep t of Environmental Protection OATH Index No. 3032/09 (July 23, 2009)
Carreras v. Dep t of Environmental Protection OATH Index No. 3032/09 (July 23, 2009) Department s denial of variance application was not an abuse of discretion where applicant did not propose adequate
More informationPavarini McGovern, LLC v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1565/14, mem. dec. (June 20, 2014)
Pavarini McGovern, LLC v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1565/14, mem. dec. (June 20, 2014) CDRB determined that contractor waived its claim for interpretation of contract documents. Appeal
More informationU.S. Department of Labor
U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges 90 Seventh Street, Suite 4-800 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 (415) 625-2200 (415) 625-2201 (FAX) Issue Date: 02 May 2017 CASE NO. 2017-OFC-00004
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Petitioner - against - JEWEL CALDWELL Respondent
Dep t of Correction v. Caldwell OATH Index No. 2702/14 (May 27, 2015), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 19, 2016), appended, modified on penalty, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Case No. 2016-0444 (Feb. 21,
More informationOffice of the Comptroller v. Lattanzio OATH Index No. 1029/04 (Oct. 13, 2004)
Office of the Comptroller v. Lattanzio OATH Index No. 1029/04 (Oct. 13, 2004) Claims specialist found guilty of violating rules against personal use of office equipment for using her office computer to
More informationSUBCHAPTER B PROCEDURAL RULES
SUBCHAPTER B PROCEDURAL RULES PART 11 GENERAL RULEMAKING PROCEDURES Subpart A Rulemaking Procedures Sec. 11.1 To what does this part apply? DEFINITION OF TERMS 11.3 What is an advance notice of proposed
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3A 1
Article 3A. Other Administrative Hearings. 150B-38. Scope; hearing required; notice; venue. (a) The provisions of this Article shall apply to: (1) Occupational licensing agencies. (2) The State Banking
More informationCHAPTER ARBITRATION
ARBITRATION 231 Rule 1301 CHAPTER 1300. ARBITRATION Subchap. Rule A. COMPULSORY ARBITRATION... 1301 B. PROCEEDING TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND CONFIRM AN ARBITRATION AWARD IN A CONSUMER CREDIT TRANSACTION...
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS CONTRACT DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD
Kreisler Borg Florman General Construction Co. on behalf of Minelli Construction Co., Inc. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index Nos. 1079/06, 1100/06, mem. dec. (June 1, 2006) Agency moved to dismiss
More informationP L A N N I N G B O A R D B Y L A W S
Department of Community Development P L A N N I N G B O A R D B Y L A W S Adopted on January 20, 2015 1. ORGANIZATION & ADMINISTRATION 1:1.Annual Organization; Elections; Meetings 1:1-1. Organization Meeting.
More informationCIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x
CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x HUDSON RELATED RETAIL LLC, -against- Petitioner, LIBERTY OF ROOSEVELT ISLAND
More information31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands
CLICK HERE to return to the home page 31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands (a) In General. (1)Issuance and service. Whenever the Attorney General, or a designee (for purposes of this section),
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,864 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,864 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ELIZABETH L. TISDALE, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Sedgwick District
More informationRules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012
Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012 20 West Street Boston, MA 02111-1218 TELEPHONE (617) 338-0500 FAX (617) 338-0550
More informationEffective January 1, 2016
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before
More informationGonzalez v 80 W. 170 Realty LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33414(U) November 20, 2018 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Doris M.
Gonzalez v 80 W. 170 Realty LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33414(U) November 20, 2018 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 301333/2013 Judge: Doris M. Gonzalez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationRULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1-1. NAME. The name of the body regulated by these rules shall be THE FLORIDA BAR.
RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Florida by these rules establishes the authority and responsibilities of The Florida Bar, an official arm of the court.
More informationPolice Dep't v. McBrien OATH Index No. 1058/09, mem. dec. (Oct. 9, 2008)
Police Dep't v. McBrien OATH Index No. 1058/09, mem. dec. (Oct. 9, 2008) Vehicle was seized as the instrumentality of a crime in connection with respondent's arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol.
More information) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON ) BOC PETITION ) ) ) ) of the Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission's (the "Commission's") decision to
STATE OF MAINE LINCOLN, ss. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-16-05 LORRAINE SCHLEIS, V. Petitioner MAINE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION, Respondent ORDER ON BOC PETITION This matter is before
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON CHAPTER I: HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON CHAPTER I: HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS Purpose These are intended to facilitate orderly open record
More informationTRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012
TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012 1. Parties to the Dispute The parties to the dispute will be the trademark holder and the gtld registry operator. ICANN
More informationTITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.
RULE 40. TITLE XIV TRIALS PLACE OF TRIAL (a) Designation of Place of Trial: The petitioner, at the time of filing the petition, shall file a designation of place of trial showing the place at which the
More informationUNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT Act 310 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT Act 310 of 1996 AN ACT to make uniform the laws relating to interstate family support enforcement; and to repeal acts and parts of acts. The People of the State of
More informationPolice Dep t v. Vertus OATH Index No. 912/09, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 2008)
Police Dep t v. Vertus OATH Index No. 912/09, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 2008) Petitioner is entitled to retain vehicle as the instrumentality of a crime pending outcome of a civil forfeiture action. NEW YORK
More informationNOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY. VESTED IN the Environmental Control Board by Section 1049-a
NOTICE OF PROMULGATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD, CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 48 OF THE RULES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY
More informationFAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF HEARINGS IN NON-REAPPOINTMENT CASES I. HEARINGS PROCEDURES A. Purposes of Reviewing Non-Reappointment Decisions A decision not to reappoint a
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL NASD DECISION
BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL NASD In the Matter of The Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs. DECISION Complaint No. C10000122 Dated: August 11, 2003 Vincent J. Puma Marlboro, New Jersey,
More informationRULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval
More informationARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS
CHAPTER 9 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION LAW NOTE: This Chapter was included in the original Government Code of Guam enacted by P.L. 1-88 in 1952. In listing the source of sections in this chapter, only amendments
More informationRhode Island False Claims Act
Rhode Island False Claims Act 9-1.1-1. Name of act. [Effective until February 15, 2008.] This chapter may be cited as the State False Claims Act. 9-1.1-2. Definitions. [Effective until February 15, 2008.]
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER
RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER INTRODUCTION The following Rules of Procedure have been adopted by the Cowlitz County Hearing Examiner. The examiner and deputy examiners
More information