Business Integrity Comm n v. Freire OATH Index No. 1600/13 (Apr. 10, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9511

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Business Integrity Comm n v. Freire OATH Index No. 1600/13 (Apr. 10, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9511"

Transcription

1 Business Integrity Comm n v. Freire OATH Index No. 1600/13 (Apr. 10, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9511 At a default hearing, evidence failed to establish that respondent was a business operating for the purpose of collecting trade waste under section (a) of the Administrative Code. Petitioner s motion to amend the pleadings to charge violation of section (b) is denied. Dismissal of violation recommended. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of BUSINESS INTEGRITY COMMISSION Petitioner -against- AMANDA FREIRE d/b/a S-LAWN CARE Respondent REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ASTRID B. GLOADE, Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the New York City Business Integrity Commission ( BIC or Commission ), brought this proceeding pursuant to section (a) of the New York City Administrative Code, and rule 1-03 of title 17 of the Rules of the City of New York after it issued Violation Number TW-9511 against respondent, Amanda Freire d/b/a S-Lawn Care. Petitioner alleges that on October 11, 2012, its investigator observed respondent collecting trade waste in the form of dirt and bricks without a BIC license for such activity, in violation of section (a) of the Administrative Code. A hearing was scheduled for March 7, Petitioner appeared by counsel, but respondent did not appear. Petitioner submitted proof of service of the notice of violation and hearing by first class mail, pursuant to its rules, upon respondent at the address displayed on respondent s vehicle registration (Pet. Exs. 1, 2). See 17 RCNY 1-02 (Lexis 2012). Petitioner thus satisfied the jurisdictional prerequisites for finding respondent in default and the hearing proceeded in the form of an inquest.

2 - 2 - PRELIMINARY MATTER Petitioner charged that respondent violated section (a) of the Administrative Code, which prohibits the unlicensed operation of a business for the purpose of collecting trade waste from commercial establishments. At the close of its case, and in response to an inquiry from this tribunal regarding Notice of Violation ( NOV ), petitioner sought leave to amend its NOV to allege violation of Administrative Code section (b), instead of section (a) as charged in the NOV. Section (b) makes it unlawful to collect trade waste generated by one s own business without first having registered with the Commission. Petitioner contended that there is no prejudice to respondent in amending the alleged violation, as it is a minor change and, had the respondent appeared, the defense would not have been different (Tr ). OATH rules require consent of the parties or permission of the administrative law judge if a pleading is to be amended less than twenty-five days before commencement of a hearing. See OATH Rules of Practice, 48 RCNY 1-25 (Lexis 2012). Permission to amend a petition is to be freely granted absent irremediable prejudice to the respondent. See Dep t of Correction v. Rebecca, OATH Index No. 151/94, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 1993). The issue here is whether amendment of the pleadings would irremediably prejudice the non-appearing respondent. It is a bedrock principal [sic] of due process that, in an administrative proceeding, as in a criminal trial, no person may lose substantial rights because of wrongdoing shown by the evidence, but not charged. See Baines v. Berlin, 36 Misc. 3d 203, 207 (Sup Ct. N.Y. Co. 2012) (quoting Murray v. Murphy, 24 N.Y.2d 150, 157 (1969)); see also Sulzer v. Environmental Control Bd. of City of NY, 165 A.D.2d 270, (1st Dep t 1991). Moreover, prejudice is presumed where there is a violation of such a fundamental constitutional right as the right to be put on notice of the charges made. Murray, 24 N.Y.2d at 157. These principles are implicated when an agency seeks to sustain a violation different from the one specified in its notice to respondent. In the context of an administrative proceeding, the charges need only be reasonably specific, in light of all the relevant circumstances, to apprise the party whose rights are being determined of the charges against him and to allow for the preparation of an adequate defense. Block v. Ambach, 73 N.Y.2d 323, 333 (1989) (citations omitted); see also D Ambrosio v. Dep t

3 - 3 - of Health, 4 N.Y.3d 133, (2005) (same). Under the circumstances here, the proposed amendment would deprive respondent of notice of the charges against him. Respondent was not on notice of the proposed section (b) violation because he was charged with a distinctly different violation. Significant distinctions between sections (a) and (b) are: 1) section (a) requires a license, while section (b) imposes a registration requirement; 2) section (a) regulates entities whose business purpose is the collection, removal, and disposal of trade waste, while section (b) regulates entities that collect, remove, and dispose of waste generated by their own business operations; 3) section (a) requires that such waste have originated from the premises of a commercial establishment required to provide for the removal of such waste, while (b) does not impose such a requirement; and 4) the maximum fine for violation of section (a) is $5,000, while the maximum fine for violation of section (b) is $1, This tribunal recently declined to sustain a (b) violation where petitioner charged respondent with violation of section (a), noting that they are different violations. Business Integrity Comm n v. Tidiani, OATH Index No. 1189/13 (Jan. 30, 2013). In Business Integrity Comm n v. Tidiani, a self-represented respondent admitted he collected in his vehicle cardboard generated in the operation of his business. ALJ Spooner concluded that while the evidence might have sustained a charge under section (b), a parallel but different violation, respondent was on notice only as to the charged section (a) violation. ALJ Spooner concluded, it would be improper to sustain a different violation here. Tidiani, OATH 1189/13 at 4. It would be similarly inappropriate in this default proceeding to permit petitioner to amend its pleading to charge respondent with a violation as to which respondent was not on notice. It should be noted that respondent s failure to appear is not an automatic bar to all amendment of the initial pleadings. Indeed, this tribunal has granted leave to amend in default proceedings. See, e.g., Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Habib, OATH Index No. 404/11 at 1-2 (Sept. 1, 2010) (finding no prejudice to respondent who failed to appear in amendment of the charges when the sole effect of the amendment was to reduce the total number of charges respondent was facing); Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Asogah, OATH Index No. 359/11 at During the hearing, petitioner indicated that the maximum fine that can be imposed for violation of section (b) is $5,000 (Tr. 23); however, section (c) of the Administrative Code provides for a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for a violation of section (b).

4 - 4 - (Aug. 26, 2010) (same); Dep t of Sanitation v. Markovich, OATH Index No. 943/02 (Feb. 2, 2005) (leave to amend charges to shorten the time period during which respondent is alleged to have been absent without leave granted at default hearing). These cases are distinguishable because the amendment served only to reduce the number or the scope of the charges of which respondent had already been placed on notice. Here, by contrast, the proposed amendment would subject respondent to a violation different from the one of which he was notified. The facts here are also distinguishable from those of Business Integrity Comm n v. Jerusalem Carting, OATH Index No. 1194/13 (Jan. 14, 2013), where, in a proceeding in which respondent did not appear, this tribunal noted that although the NOV referenced a section of the BIC Rules different from the one described in the NOV, the respondent was adequately placed on notice of the nature of the violation by the accurate description of the violation in the narrative portion of the NOV. Business Integrity Comm n v. Jerusalem Carting Inc., OATH Index No. 1194/13 at 2 n.1 (Jan. 14, 2013). The NOV in this case did not place respondent on notice that he would be called upon to defend against a section (b) violation at the hearing. For example, the pre-printed NOV form shows two boxes the inspector can check: one box indicates (a) and the other (b). Only the box for (a) is checked. In the section labeled description of violation and date(s) of unlicensed or unregistered activity, the entry states Unlicensed Activity, which is a section (a) violation. Finally, the narrative portion of the NOV summarizes the inspector s observations, 2 but does not describe the violation in a manner that would alert respondent that he should be prepared to defend any charge other than the stated section (a) violation. 3 In sum, the NOV here, unlike that in Business Integrity Comm n v. Jerusalem Carting Inc., fails to put respondent on notice that he should be prepared to defend against a different violation. 2 The narrative portion of the NOV states: On October 11, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., this commission investigator did observe a 2002 White GMC dump truck. This vehicle had New York State DMV license plate and vehicle identification numbers (see below) and was observed collecting and transporting trade waste (excavated dirt and bricks). By admission of driver, waste was picked up at 355 Barlow Avenue, Staten Island, NY and was being transported to 451 Spencer Street SI, NY (Transfer Station). Driver stated that owner just bought company one month ago. There were no commission issued trade waste license plates affixed to any part of the vehicle. S-Lawn Care nor Amanda Freire have submitted an application for a license or registration with the Commission. 3 The NOV indicates that respondent did not apply for a license or registration, but in the face of the specific notice of the (a) violation, an unexplained reference to registration is insufficient to alert respondent of the need to defend against a (b) charge, given that the NOV clearly alleges only unlicensed activity under section (a).

5 - 5 - Therefore, petitioner s motion for leave to amend its pleading to allege violation of Administrative Code section (b), instead of section (a), is denied. ANALYSIS Any business that collects trade waste is required to obtain a license from the Commission. Admin. Code (a) (Lexis 2012). Trade waste is defined as materials that are discarded by a commercial establishment, including garbage, refuse, street sweepings, rubbish construction and demolition debris... Admin. Code (f) (Lexis 2012). Section (a) provides an exemption for the collection and removal of construction and demolition debris, but only if the exemption is granted by the Commission upon application by the hauler. Admin. Code (a) ( Grant of such exemption shall be made by the commission upon its review of an exemption application ). Petitioner alleges respondent violated section (a) by collecting trade waste in the form of excavated dirt and bricks without a Commission license. At the hearing, petitioner relied on documentary evidence and the testimony of BIC Investigator Albergo. Petitioner produced a copy of NOV number TW-9511 issued to respondent, with attached photographs (Pet. Ex. 2). The NOV states that on October 11, 2012, at about 10:00 a.m., Investigator Albergo observed a white 2002 GMC dump truck collecting trade waste in the form of excavated dirt and bricks. The investigator determined that the vehicle is registered to Amanda Freire and the driver told Investigator Albergo that its owner had recently acquired the company, S-Lawn Care, Inc. (Pet. Ex. 2; Tr. 15, 17). The NOV and photographs indicate that no BIC-issued license plate was affixed to the vehicle, as required by section 5-10(a) of petitioner s rules. See 17 RCNY 5-10(a) (Lexis 2012). The investigator determined that respondent had not applied for or been granted a Commission license or registration (Pet. Ex. 2). Photographs of the inside of the truck show dirt, grass mixed in with the dirt, and five bricks of a type referred to as pavers (Tr. 19). Photographs of the door of the vehicle show S- Lawn Care, Inc., a phone number, and a street address, but no building number. Another photograph shows the words sod, shrubs, flowers, pavers on the side of the vehicle. The NOV indicates that the driver admitted that he picked up the material in the vehicle at 355 Barlow Avenue, Staten Island, New York, and was transporting it to a transfer station located at 451 Spencer Street, Staten Island (Pet. Ex. 2). According to Investigator Albergo, the driver stated he

6 - 6 - had been working on a job at the address where the dirt was collected (Tr ). Investigator Albergo further testified that he observed the truck drive towards a transfer station where debris is deposited, which station is located down the block from where he stopped the vehicle (Tr. 16). Section (a) requires that the collected material constitute trade waste. Here, the evidence makes it more likely than not that the dirt, grass, and brick pavers observed in respondent s vehicle was trade waste. The unrebutted evidence is that Investigator Albergo saw respondent s driver transporting the material towards a transfer station, where debris is discarded, and the driver admitted to the investigator that he was transporting the material to a transfer station. Cf. Business Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC, OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) (had driver stated that material in his truck was being transported to a specified address, it would have been insufficient to show the contents of the truck were being discarded, since it is as plausible that the soil was being used as landscaping material). Therefore, the evidence shows that dirt, grass, and brick pavers observed in respondent s truck were refuse or rubbish, which falls within the definition of trade waste. See Admin. Code (f). The evidence, however, does not satisfy other requirements of section (a). The proof does not support a finding that respondent was operating a business for the purpose of collecting, removing, and disposing of trade waste. Based upon respondent s name, S-Lawn Care, Inc., as well as the dirt, grass, and pavers that were observed in the vehicle, it is reasonable to infer that respondent is a commercial landscaping business. See Business Integrity Comm n v. Lanmarc Management Inc., OATH Index No. 879/13 at 2 (Dec. 20, 2012), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Dec. 31, 2012) (it is fair to infer from respondent s name that it is a commercial landscaping business). Moreover, although the NOV describes the material in respondent s truck as excavated dirt and bricks, there is no evidence to support a conclusion that the material constitutes construction and demolition debris being transported by a contractor, which would require an exemption from the Commission. Section (a) provides that a business solely engaged in the removal of waste materials resulting from building demolition, construction, alteration or excavation shall be exempt from the licensing provisions of section (a), provided they obtain an exemption issued by the Commission. Admin. Code (a) (Lexis 2012). A

7 - 7 - contractor who removes construction and demolition debris from a job site without a license or an exemption is in violation of section (a). Business Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC, OATH Index No. 1107/13 at 3-4 (Feb. 7, 2013) (citing EdCia Corp. v. McCormack, 44 A.D.3d 991, (2d Dep t 2007); DeCostole Carting, Inc. v. Maldonado, 35 A.D.3d 648, 649 (2d Dep t 2006); Business Integrity Comm n v. Popular Pioneer Contracting, Inc., Violation No. TW-7492, Dep t of Consumer Affairs Appeal Determination at 2 (July 13, 2012)). In this case, the photographs taken by the investigator show dirt mixed with grass and five brick pavers, which are typically used in landscaping. Moreover, during the hearing, the investigator indicated that he did not know how the material in the truck was generated, only the address of the location at which it was collected (Tr ). This evidence does not support finding that respondent was a contractor engaged in the removal of construction and demolition debris from a job site. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the waste was generated by a commercial establishment, as is required by section (a). Therefore, the evidence fails to establish respondent was operating a business for the purpose of collecting trade waste in violation of section (a). See All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC, OATH Index No. 1107/13 at 3-4 (16-505(a) violation dismissed where evidence failed to established that landscaper with dirt in his truck was operating a business for the purpose of collecting trade waste); see also Tidiani, OATH 1189/13 at 3 (16-505(a) violation dismissed where evidence failed to establish that respondent with trade waste in his vehicle was operating a business for the purpose of collecting trade waste); Business Integrity Comm n v. Camara, OATH Index No. 1063/13 at 2-3 (Jan. 15, 2013) (16-505(a) violation dismissed where evidence established only the presence of trade waste inside a commercial vehicle). For the foregoing reasons, the evidence fails to establish that respondent violated section (a) and NOV TWC-9511 should be dismissed. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1) Respondent was properly served with the Notice of Violation and Notice of Hearing and failed to appear at the scheduled hearing.

8 - 8-2) Petitioner s motion for leave to amend its pleadings to allege violation of section (b) of the Administrative Code in lieu of section (a) is denied due to lack of notice to respondent. 3) Petitioner failed to prove that respondent was operating a business for the purpose of collecting of trade waste under section (a) of the Administrative Code. RECOMMENDATION Violation number TWC-9511 should therefore be dismissed. April 10, 2013 Astrid B. Gloade Administrative Law Judge SUBMITTED TO: SHARI C. HYMAN Commissioner & Chair APPEARANCES: AMY BEDFORD, ESQ. Attorney for Petitioner No Appearance by or for Respondent

Business Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9332

Business Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9332 Business Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9332 In a default hearing, the proof failed to establish that landscaper with dirt

More information

Dep't of Buildings v. 67 Greenwich Street, New York County OATH Index No. 1666/09 (Apr. 10, 2009)

Dep't of Buildings v. 67 Greenwich Street, New York County OATH Index No. 1666/09 (Apr. 10, 2009) Dep't of Buildings v. 67 Greenwich Street, New York County OATH Index No. 1666/09 (Apr. 10, 2009) Undisputed evidence at zoning violation proceeding established that property was being used for impermissible

More information

NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS

NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Hidalgo v. Ditmas Park Rehabilitation and Care Center, LLC OATH Index Nos. 2415/13, 2416/13, & 2417/13, mem. dec. (Sept. 25, 2013) Respondents who failed to timely submit

More information

Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Hawkins OATH Index No. 1043/16 (Apr. 19, 2016), adopted, Bd. Dec. (Sept. 22, 2016), appended

Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Hawkins OATH Index No. 1043/16 (Apr. 19, 2016), adopted, Bd. Dec. (Sept. 22, 2016), appended Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Hawkins OATH Index No. 1043/16 (Apr. 19, 2016), adopted, Bd. Dec. (Sept. 22, 2016), appended Respondent, a NYCHA property maintenance supervisor, violated New York City Charter

More information

Prismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 1239/16, mem. dec. (June 30, 2016)

Prismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 1239/16, mem. dec. (June 30, 2016) Prismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 1239/16, mem. dec. (June 30, 2016) General contractor sought extra compensation for costs to install devices that it furnished under the

More information

Dell-Tech Enterprises, Inc. v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 410/16, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2016)

Dell-Tech Enterprises, Inc. v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 410/16, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2016) Dell-Tech Enterprises, Inc. v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 410/16, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2016) Contractor s petition for additional payment dismissed because it was untimely and waived. NEW

More information

Pavarini McGovern, LLC v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1565/14, mem. dec. (June 20, 2014)

Pavarini McGovern, LLC v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1565/14, mem. dec. (June 20, 2014) Pavarini McGovern, LLC v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1565/14, mem. dec. (June 20, 2014) CDRB determined that contractor waived its claim for interpretation of contract documents. Appeal

More information

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Khouma OATH Index No. 2550/15 (July 2, 2015), adopted, Dep. Comm r Dec. (July 23, 2015), appended

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Khouma OATH Index No. 2550/15 (July 2, 2015), adopted, Dep. Comm r Dec. (July 23, 2015), appended Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Khouma OATH Index No. 2550/15 (July 2, 2015), adopted, Dep. Comm r Dec. (July 23, 2015), appended At summary suspension hearing, petitioner established that respondent taxicab

More information

Taxi and Limousine Comm n v. Manawar OATH Index No. 169/11 (Aug. 13, 2010)

Taxi and Limousine Comm n v. Manawar OATH Index No. 169/11 (Aug. 13, 2010) Taxi and Limousine Comm n v. Manawar OATH Index No. 169/11 (Aug. 13, 2010) In a default proceeding, petitioner proved that a taxicab driver overcharged passengers on 350 occasions. ALJ recommended revocation

More information

Comm n on Human Rights v. Aksoy OATH Index No. 1617/15 (Aug. 24, 2015), rejected, Comm n Dec. & Order (June 21, 2017), appended

Comm n on Human Rights v. Aksoy OATH Index No. 1617/15 (Aug. 24, 2015), rejected, Comm n Dec. & Order (June 21, 2017), appended Comm n on Human Rights v. Aksoy OATH Index No. 1617/15 (Aug. 24, 2015), rejected, Comm n Dec. & Order (June 21, 2017), appended Evidence established that respondent violated New York City s Human Rights

More information

Police Dep't v. Davis OATH Index No. 1297/15, mem. dec. (Dec. 26, 2014)

Police Dep't v. Davis OATH Index No. 1297/15, mem. dec. (Dec. 26, 2014) Police Dep't v. Davis OATH Index No. 1297/15, mem. dec. (Dec. 26, 2014) Respondent s motion to dismiss petition granted where petitioner failed to serve respondent with notice of right to request retention

More information

CDRB determined that contractor waived its claim regarding its contractual responsibility for wiring installation. Appeal denied.

CDRB determined that contractor waived its claim regarding its contractual responsibility for wiring installation. Appeal denied. Summit Construction Services Group, Inc. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 456/15, mem. dec. (Jan. 26, 2015), aff d, Index No. 155253/2015 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. Aug. 20, 2015), appended CDRB

More information

Petition seeking compensation for alleged unpaid work denied. Claim dismissed as untimely. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS

Petition seeking compensation for alleged unpaid work denied. Claim dismissed as untimely. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS Start Elevator, Inc. v. Dep t. of Correction OATH Index No. 1160/11, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2011), aff d, Index No. 104620/11 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. Jan. 9, 2012), appended, aff d, 104 A.D.3d 488 (1 st Dep t

More information

Human Resources Admin. v. Cornelius OATH Index No. 2041/13 (July 10, 2013)

Human Resources Admin. v. Cornelius OATH Index No. 2041/13 (July 10, 2013) Human Resources Admin. v. Cornelius OATH Index No. 2041/13 (July 10, 2013) Undisputed evidence established that respondent was continuously absent without leave (AWOL) for more than a year, from January

More information

Commissioner determined licensee s conduct was sufficiently serious to warrant license revocation and he imposed that penalty.

Commissioner determined licensee s conduct was sufficiently serious to warrant license revocation and he imposed that penalty. Dep't of Buildings v. Inglese OATH Index No. 929/10 (Feb. 4, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 23, 2010), appended, remanded sub nom Inglese v. LiMandri, 2010 NY Slip Op 32967U; 2010 N.Y. Misc.

More information

Fire Dep t v. Buttaro OATH Index No. 2430/14, mem. dec. (July 17, 2014)

Fire Dep t v. Buttaro OATH Index No. 2430/14, mem. dec. (July 17, 2014) Fire Dep t v. Buttaro OATH Index No. 2430/14, mem. dec. (July 17, 2014) Respondent s motion to dismiss is denied in part and denied in part with leave to renew. Respondent s motions to preclude interview

More information

Office of the City Clerk v. Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty OATH Index No. 1940/12, mem. dec. (Aug.

Office of the City Clerk v. Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty OATH Index No. 1940/12, mem. dec. (Aug. Office of the City Clerk v. Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty OATH Index No. 1940/12, mem. dec. (Aug. 30, 2012) Respondent s motion to dismiss for untimeliness denied as the

More information

Skyline Credit Ride, Inc. v. Board of Elections OATH Index No. 878/12, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2012)

Skyline Credit Ride, Inc. v. Board of Elections OATH Index No. 878/12, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2012) Skyline Credit Ride, Inc. v. Board of Elections OATH Index No. 878/12, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2012) Petition dismissed as untimely. The petitioner was late in submitting its Notice of Claim to the Comptroller.

More information

Police Dep t v. Jaber OATH Index No. 2415/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009)

Police Dep t v. Jaber OATH Index No. 2415/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009) Police Dep t v. Jaber OATH Index No. 2415/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009) Vehicle was seized as the instrumentality of a crime in connection with driver's arrest for selling counterfeit merchandise. Petitioner

More information

Fire Dep t v. Harper OATH Index No. 503/14, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2014)

Fire Dep t v. Harper OATH Index No. 503/14, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2014) Fire Dep t v. Harper OATH Index No. 503/14, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2014) Employee s application for stay based on pendency of state proceeding is denied. Application for discovery and to compel petitioner

More information

Health and Hospitals Corp. (Harlem Hospital Center) v. Norwood OATH Index No. 143/05, mem. dec. (June 20, 2005)

Health and Hospitals Corp. (Harlem Hospital Center) v. Norwood OATH Index No. 143/05, mem. dec. (June 20, 2005) Health and Hospitals Corp. (Harlem Hospital Center) v. Norwood OATH Index No. 143/05, mem. dec. (June 20, 2005) Petitioner's post-report and recommendation motion to reopen the record to submit new evidence

More information

Police Dep t v. Nightstar OATH Index No. 3190/09, mem. dec. (June 19, 2009)

Police Dep t v. Nightstar OATH Index No. 3190/09, mem. dec. (June 19, 2009) Police Dep t v. Nightstar OATH Index No. 3190/09, mem. dec. (June 19, 2009) In vehicle forfeiture proceeding, ALJ found that petitioner proved that owner was not innocent and that the other Krimstock elements

More information

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Behar OATH Index No. 0076/17 (Oct. 14, 2016)

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Behar OATH Index No. 0076/17 (Oct. 14, 2016) Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Behar OATH Index No. 0076/17 (Oct. 14, 2016) In a discretionary revocation proceeding, petitioner proved that taxi driver harassed a passenger by exiting his taxicab and pursuing

More information

Dep t of Buildings v. 74 Targee Street, Staten Island OATH Index No. 1302/09 (May 27, 2009)

Dep t of Buildings v. 74 Targee Street, Staten Island OATH Index No. 1302/09 (May 27, 2009) Dep t of Buildings v. 74 Targee Street, Staten Island OATH Index No. 1302/09 (May 27, 2009) Petitioner established that the premises is being used for an impermissible commercial use. Respondents failed

More information

Dep't of Buildings v. Mascarella OATH Index No. 2757/10 (Dec. 22, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec (Jan. 5, 2011), appended

Dep't of Buildings v. Mascarella OATH Index No. 2757/10 (Dec. 22, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec (Jan. 5, 2011), appended Dep't of Buildings v. Mascarella OATH Index No. 2757/10 (Dec. 22, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec (Jan. 5, 2011), appended Respondent, a licensed hoist machine operator, pled guilty to conspiracy

More information

Dep t of Buildings v. Manchester OATH Index No. 467/15 (Jan. 28, 2015)

Dep t of Buildings v. Manchester OATH Index No. 467/15 (Jan. 28, 2015) Dep t of Buildings v. Manchester OATH Index No. 467/15 (Jan. 28, 2015) Hoist machine operator, whose driver s license was revoked upon his conviction for driving while intoxicated, failed to maintain a

More information

Police Dep t v. Neiss OATH Index No. 2094/09, mem. dec. (Feb. 9, 2009)

Police Dep t v. Neiss OATH Index No. 2094/09, mem. dec. (Feb. 9, 2009) Police Dep t v. Neiss OATH Index No. 2094/09, mem. dec. (Feb. 9, 2009) In vehicle forfeiture proceeding, ALJ found that claimant failed to provide proof she was the registered or titled owner under Krimstock.

More information

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Crow-Martinez OATH Index No. 0084/18 (Aug. 18, 2017)*

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Crow-Martinez OATH Index No. 0084/18 (Aug. 18, 2017)* Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Crow-Martinez OATH Index No. 0084/18 (Aug. 18, 2017)* Following respondent s arrest for unlawfully soliciting ground transportation services at an airport, petitioner suspended

More information

Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Thomas v. Mutual Apartments Inc. OATH Index No. 2399/14, mem. dec. (Sept. 2, 2014)

Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Thomas v. Mutual Apartments Inc. OATH Index No. 2399/14, mem. dec. (Sept. 2, 2014) Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Thomas v. Mutual Apartments Inc. OATH Index No. 2399/14, mem. dec. (Sept. 2, 2014) Petitioner s motion to compel discovery is denied as it requested information about accommodation

More information

Police Dep t v. Weaver OATH Index No. 2419/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009)

Police Dep t v. Weaver OATH Index No. 2419/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009) Police Dep t v. Weaver OATH Index No. 2419/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009) Department is entitled to retain vehicle as the instrumentality of a crime pending a civil forfeiture action. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE

More information

THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : Index No. Petitioner, : 151/94

THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : Index No. Petitioner, : 151/94 THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : Index No. Petitioner,

More information

Police Dep t v. Vertus OATH Index No. 912/09, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 2008)

Police Dep t v. Vertus OATH Index No. 912/09, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 2008) Police Dep t v. Vertus OATH Index No. 912/09, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 2008) Petitioner is entitled to retain vehicle as the instrumentality of a crime pending outcome of a civil forfeiture action. NEW YORK

More information

Carreras v. Dep t of Environmental Protection OATH Index No. 3032/09 (July 23, 2009)

Carreras v. Dep t of Environmental Protection OATH Index No. 3032/09 (July 23, 2009) Carreras v. Dep t of Environmental Protection OATH Index No. 3032/09 (July 23, 2009) Department s denial of variance application was not an abuse of discretion where applicant did not propose adequate

More information

Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Donas OATH Index No. 781/09 (Feb. 13, 2009), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No, CD SA (Nov.

Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Donas OATH Index No. 781/09 (Feb. 13, 2009), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No, CD SA (Nov. Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Donas OATH Index No. 781/09 (Feb. 13, 2009), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No, CD 09-70- SA (Nov. 12, 2009) Respondent used Department s e-mail in violation of

More information

Perfetto Enterprises v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1646/15, mem. dec. (June 11, 2015)

Perfetto Enterprises v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1646/15, mem. dec. (June 11, 2015) Perfetto Enterprises v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1646/15, mem. dec. (June 11, 2015) Petition seeking additional payment for asphalt work denied because claim was untimely, waived, and

More information

NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS

NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS Comm n on Human Rights v. Tantillo OATH Index Nos. 105/11, 106/11 & 107/11 (Feb. 24, 2011), modified on penalty, Comm n Dec. & Order (May 23, 2011), appended In default proceeding, petitioner established

More information

Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014)

Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014) Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014) At a default hearing, petitioner established that respondent s employee discriminated against complainant

More information

Fire Dep't v. Domini OATH Index No. 2047/11, mem. dec. (July 28, 2011)

Fire Dep't v. Domini OATH Index No. 2047/11, mem. dec. (July 28, 2011) Fire Dep't v. Domini OATH Index No. 2047/11, mem. dec. (July 28, 2011) Respondent s motion to dismiss, on the basis of defective pleadings or until a related matter is determined in federal district court,

More information

NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS CONTRACT DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD

NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS CONTRACT DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD Prismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 2405/14, mem. dec. (Oct. 22, 2014), aff d, Index No. 100295/2015 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. 2015), appended Contractor waived claim for extra compensation

More information

Dep t of Probation v. Dixon OATH Index No. 156/11 (Nov. 30, 2010)

Dep t of Probation v. Dixon OATH Index No. 156/11 (Nov. 30, 2010) Dep t of Probation v. Dixon OATH Index No. 156/11 (Nov. 30, 2010) Petitioner demonstrated that probation officer engaged in a confrontation with police officers, acted in a manner to discredit the agency,

More information

Matter of City Bros., Inc. v Business Integrity Commn NY Slip Op 33427(U) December 4, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Matter of City Bros., Inc. v Business Integrity Commn NY Slip Op 33427(U) December 4, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Matter of City Bros., Inc. v Business Integrity Commn. 2013 NY Slip Op 33427(U) December 4, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 101324/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

Sec Definitions:

Sec Definitions: Kane County Code Chapter 11: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, ARTICLE IV. RECYCLING AND HAULER LICENSING ORDINANCE 95-157 Sec. 11-108. Definitions: Commercial Establishment: Any building or any part of a building

More information

Matter of Baumrind v Beddoe 2013 NY Slip Op 30692(U) April 5, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Peter H.

Matter of Baumrind v Beddoe 2013 NY Slip Op 30692(U) April 5, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Peter H. Matter of Baumrind v Beddoe 2013 NY Slip Op 30692(U) April 5, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 103338/12 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts

More information

Rhodes v. Dep t of Correction OATH Index No. 227/05 (July 14, 2005)

Rhodes v. Dep t of Correction OATH Index No. 227/05 (July 14, 2005) Rhodes v. Dep t of Correction OATH Index No. 227/05 (July 14, 2005) Petitioner, a former probationary correction officer, had been terminated in connection with a use of force incident. Petitioner sought

More information

Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Licari OATH Index No. 1685/07 (June 5, 2007)

Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Licari OATH Index No. 1685/07 (June 5, 2007) Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Licari OATH Index No. 1685/07 (June 5, 2007) Respondent did not appear at the hearing because he is currently incarcerated for arson, insurance fraud and larceny. During

More information

Dep t of Correction v. LaSonde OATH Index No. 2526/11 (Aug. 18, 2011)

Dep t of Correction v. LaSonde OATH Index No. 2526/11 (Aug. 18, 2011) Dep t of Correction v. LaSonde OATH Index No. 2526/11 (Aug. 18, 2011) Correction officer refused to answer questions in MEO-16 interview. Termination from employment recommended. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF

More information

LiRo/HAKS, J.V. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 1466/14, mem. dec. (Mar. 31, 2014)

LiRo/HAKS, J.V. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 1466/14, mem. dec. (Mar. 31, 2014) LiRo/HAKS, J.V. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 1466/14, mem. dec. (Mar. 31, 2014) Petition requesting additional compensation for electrical work dismissed as time-barred. NEW YORK CITY

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of JIANA BOONE,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of JIANA BOONE, SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of JIANA BOONE, Index No. Petitioner, For a Judgment Pursuant to CPLR Article 78 against THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT

More information

Dep t of Buildings v. 120 St. Marks Place, Manhattan OATH Index No. 648/09 (Apr. 27, 2009), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 30, 2009), appended

Dep t of Buildings v. 120 St. Marks Place, Manhattan OATH Index No. 648/09 (Apr. 27, 2009), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 30, 2009), appended Dep t of Buildings v. 120 St. Marks Place, Manhattan OATH Index No. 648/09 (Apr. 27, 2009), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 30, 2009), appended Petitioner established that the premises are being used for an

More information

ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF LOYD BREWER, ) DOCKET NO NOV BREWER DIRT WORKS, INC. ) ORDER NO.

ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF LOYD BREWER, ) DOCKET NO NOV BREWER DIRT WORKS, INC. ) ORDER NO. ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF LOYD BREWER, ) DOCKET NO. 05-004-NOV BREWER DIRT WORKS, INC. ) ORDER NO. 3 RECOMMENDED DECISION Appearances: Mr. Loyd Brewer, pro se,

More information

Chapter 113, GARBAGE, RUBBISH AND REFUSE

Chapter 113, GARBAGE, RUBBISH AND REFUSE Chapter 113, GARBAGE, RUBBISH AND REFUSE [HISTORY: Adopted by the Common Council of the City of Rensselaer as indicated in article histories. Amendments noted where applicable.] GENERAL REFERENCES Storage

More information

MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, AS : DECOTIIS IN OPPOSITION TO

MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, AS : DECOTIIS IN OPPOSITION TO SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : INDEX NO.: 190311/2015 ASBESTOS LITIGATION : : This Document Relates To: : : AFFIRMATION OF LEIGH A MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT,

More information

STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of the Alleged Violations of Article 27 of the Environmental Conservation Law ( ECL ) and Part 360 of Title 6 of the Official Compilation

More information

CHAPTER 3 GARBAGE AND REFUSE

CHAPTER 3 GARBAGE AND REFUSE 4-3-1 4-3-1 CHAPTER 3 GARBAGE AND REFUSE SECTION: 4-3-1: Definitions 4-3-2: Collection and Pickup of Garbage 4-3-3: Service Charges 4-3-4: Regulations 4-3-5: Vehicles and Equipment 4-3-6: Inspections 4-3-7:

More information

Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 20, 2016), appended

Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 20, 2016), appended Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Stamm v. E & E Bagels, Inc. OATH Index No. 803/14 (Mar. 21, 2014), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 20, 2016), appended At a default hearing, petitioner established that respondent

More information

Admin. for Children s Services v. Hane OATH Index No. 1460/14 (Aug. 27, 2014)

Admin. for Children s Services v. Hane OATH Index No. 1460/14 (Aug. 27, 2014) Admin. for Children s Services v. Hane OATH Index No. 1460/14 (Aug. 27, 2014) Petitioner proved that respondent, a research assistant, committed the crimes of assault, resisting arrest, intentional property

More information

THE TRAFFIC ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS. (A Political Subdivision of the State of Louisiana)

THE TRAFFIC ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS. (A Political Subdivision of the State of Louisiana) THE TRAFFIC ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS (A Political Subdivision of the State of Louisiana) AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE OF CARTS, DRAYS, WAGONS, AUTOMOBILES,

More information

Dep t of Buildings v. Stamberger OATH Index No. 473/12 (Mar. 30, 2012), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 5, 2012), appended

Dep t of Buildings v. Stamberger OATH Index No. 473/12 (Mar. 30, 2012), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 5, 2012), appended Dep t of Buildings v. Stamberger OATH Index No. 473/12 (Mar. 30, 2012), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 5, 2012), appended Licensed site safety manager pleaded guilty in 2011 to federal charges of conspiracy

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE Effective date: February 2, 1982 Amended date: March 2, 2010 (to take effect April 1, 2010)

More information

STARK COUNTY SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE

STARK COUNTY SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE STARK COUNTY SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE PREAMBLE This ordinance is established to eliminate vectors and nuisances and the transmission of disease organisms resulting from improper storage and inadequate handling

More information

Chapter 103 LITTERING

Chapter 103 LITTERING Chapter 103 LITTERING 103-1. Littering prohibited. 103-2. Use of receptacles. 103-3. Sweeping litter into streets; sidewalks. 103-4. Littering streets from business premises; sidewalks. 103-5. Litter from

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Steven Andrew Maulfair, : Petitioner : : No. 1202 C.D. 2014 v. : Submitted: December 12, 2014 : Pennsylvania Game Commission, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/02/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/02/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DEMOND MOORE and MICHAEL KIMMELMAN, P.C. v. Plaintiffs, CIOX HEALTH LLC and NYU HOSPITALS CENTER, Defendants. Index No. 655060/2016 ASSIGNED JUDGE

More information

TITLE 17 REFUSE AND TRASH DISPOSAL REFUSE

TITLE 17 REFUSE AND TRASH DISPOSAL REFUSE Change 17, February 15, 2018 17-1 TITLE 17 REFUSE AND TRASH DISPOSAL CHAPTER 1. REFUSE. CHAPTER 1 REFUSE SECTION 17-101. Refuse defined. 17-102. Premises to be kept clean. 17-103. Residential, small commercial

More information

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES 1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 CITATION These civil rules should be cited as "Marin County Rule, Civil" or "MCR Civ" followed by the rule number (e.g., Marin County Rule, Civil 1.1 or MCR Civ 1.1).

More information

Chapter 8 GARBAGE AND REFUSE*

Chapter 8 GARBAGE AND REFUSE* Chapter 8 GARBAGE AND REFUSE* ---------- *Cross reference(s)--fire protection and prevention, Ch. 7; health and sanitation, Ch. 9; housing, Ch. 10; antilitter regulations, 12-191, et seq. ---------- Sec.

More information

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Kowal OATH Index No. 1614/10 (Mar. 16, 2010), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD A (May 4, 2011), appended

Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Kowal OATH Index No. 1614/10 (Mar. 16, 2010), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD A (May 4, 2011), appended Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Kowal OATH Index No. 1614/10 (Mar. 16, 2010), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No. CD 11-26-A (May 4, 2011), appended Inspector unnecessarily engaged an irate taxi driver and

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/08/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/08/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/08/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/08/2012 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/08/2012 INDEX NO. 113967/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF 02/08/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

Chapter 42 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION

Chapter 42 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION Chapter 42 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION 42.01 Adoption of State Statutes 42.02 Code Hearing Unit 42.03 Director 42.04 Compliance Administrators 42.05 Administrative Law Judge 42.06 Notice of Violation (Non-Vehicular)

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2017 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/2017 0627 PM INDEX NO. 651715/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF 06/19/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS PART - - - - - - - - - -

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE DIVISION ORDER AND OPINION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE DIVISION ORDER AND OPINION Administrative: CODE ENFORCEMENT Competent Substantial Evidence There was competent substantial evidence that there were inoperative commercial vehicles on Appellant s residential property. Appellants

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/22/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/22/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/22/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/22/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/22/2014 INDEX NO. 650099/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/22/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK KIMBERLY SLAYTON, Petitioner, Index

More information

The Break-Up: Considerations in Dissolving and Liquidating a Business

The Break-Up: Considerations in Dissolving and Liquidating a Business The Break-Up: Considerations in Dissolving and Liquidating a Business Brian D. Gwitt, Esq., Partner, Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP (BGwitt@woodsoviatt.com) Kelly G. Besaw, CPA, CVA, Partner, Chiampou Travis

More information

Tenesela v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn NY Slip Op 33355(U) December 2, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10

Tenesela v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn NY Slip Op 33355(U) December 2, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Tenesela v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn. 2010 NY Slip Op 33355(U) December 2, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 108805/10 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Republished from New York State

More information

Town of Waldoboro, Maine Transfer Station Committee Meeting Minutes Municipal Building Atlantic Highway Thursday, October 27, :00 p.m.

Town of Waldoboro, Maine Transfer Station Committee Meeting Minutes Municipal Building Atlantic Highway Thursday, October 27, :00 p.m. Town of Waldoboro, Maine Transfer Station Committee Meeting Minutes Municipal Building - 1600 Atlantic Highway Thursday, October 27, 2011 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order Bob Butler, Waldoboro citizen, called

More information

City of Palo Alto Residential Preferential Parking (RPP) Administrative Guidelines

City of Palo Alto Residential Preferential Parking (RPP) Administrative Guidelines City of Palo Alto Residential Preferential Parking (RPP) Administrative Guidelines Updated October 31, 2016 PURPOSE The City of Palo Alto is committed to preserving the quality of life of its residential

More information

CHAPTER 7. SANITATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL. Table of Contents Garbage and Rubbish...Ch. 7 Pg Definitions...Ch. 7 Pg.

CHAPTER 7. SANITATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL. Table of Contents Garbage and Rubbish...Ch. 7 Pg Definitions...Ch. 7 Pg. CHAPTER 7. SANITATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Table of Contents 7.10. Garbage and Rubbish...Ch. 7 Pg. 1 7.11. Definitions...Ch. 7 Pg. 1 7.12. General Regulations...Ch. 7 Pg. 2 7.13. Disposal Required....Ch.

More information

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT 1958

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT 1958 THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT 1958 Act 14/1958 Proclaimed by [Proclamation No. 9 of 1958] w. e. f. 16 th August 1958 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 1 Short title 2 Interpretation 2A

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------x "â - â - â â " â â In the Matter of the Application of LMJ Realty LLC,

More information

NOTICE OF DECISION. Summons Number: FC License Number: B02617 Decision Date: 01/06/2015 Hearing Officer: Ann Macadangdang

NOTICE OF DECISION. Summons Number: FC License Number: B02617 Decision Date: 01/06/2015 Hearing Officer: Ann Macadangdang 33 Beaver Street, 19th Floor New York, NY 10004 NOTICE OF DECISION TAXI AND LIMOUSINE COMMISSION Petitioner -against- WEITER LLC. 27-55 JACKSON AVENUE, LIC, NY 11101 Summons Number: FC0000332 License Number:

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 03/27/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2018

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 03/27/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX MARIA AGUILAR, Index No.: 25084/2016E against Plaintiff ALLIANCE PARKING SERVICES, LLC, ALLIANCE PARKING MAINTENANCE, LLC, ALLIANCE 185TH PARKING,

More information

Tanriverdi v United Skates of Am., Inc NY Slip Op 32865(U) July 29, 2015 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Roy S.

Tanriverdi v United Skates of Am., Inc NY Slip Op 32865(U) July 29, 2015 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Roy S. Tanriverdi v United Skates of Am., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 32865(U) July 29, 2015 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 601784/12 Judge: Roy S. Mahon Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/25/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/25/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF NEW YORK, - against - Plaintiff, Index No. 451648/2017 Mot. Seq. No. 002 FC 42 ND STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF

More information

Cullum, Paulette v. K-Mac Holding Corp d/b/a Taco Bell

Cullum, Paulette v. K-Mac Holding Corp d/b/a Taco Bell University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 12-23-2014 Cullum, Paulette

More information

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION } In re North East Materials Group, LLC } Docket No. 143-10-12 Vtec (Appeal of Neighbors for Healthy Communities) } } Decision on Motion for Summary

More information

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY. LCB File No. R Effective October 24, 2014

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY. LCB File No. R Effective October 24, 2014 ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY LCB File No. R106-12 Effective October 24, 2014 EXPLANATION Matter in italics is new; matter in brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 518 OF GARBAGE, TRASH, REFUSE AND INCONSISTENT WITH CLEANLINESS AND HEALTH IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, ALABAMA, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE

ORDINANCE NO. 518 OF GARBAGE, TRASH, REFUSE AND INCONSISTENT WITH CLEANLINESS AND HEALTH IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, ALABAMA, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE 33 r AN ORDINANCE NO. 58 AN ORDINANCE TO LEVY A FEE OR CHARGE FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE, TRASH, REFUSE, DEAD ANIMALS AND FOWLS, ALL THINGS OFFENSIVE TO HEALTH, IN THE NATURE OF GARBAGE,

More information

PREPARING A CASE FOR APPEAL

PREPARING A CASE FOR APPEAL PREPARING A CASE FOR APPEAL Presented by Randy Glasser, Esq. November 6, 2013 77 Conklin Street Farmingdale, New York 11735 24 Century Hill Drive Latham, New York 12110 1 INTRODUCTION The Individuals with

More information

TITLE 17 REFUSE AND TRASH DISPOSAL¹ CHAPTER 1 REFUSE²

TITLE 17 REFUSE AND TRASH DISPOSAL¹ CHAPTER 1 REFUSE² 1 1/2013 CHAPTER 1. REFUSE. 2. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL. TITLE 17 REFUSE AND TRASH DISPOSAL¹ CHAPTER 1 REFUSE² SECTION 17-101. Definitions. 17-102. Containers. 17-103. Disposal or burning. 17-104. Swill, handling

More information

Plaintiff, : OPINION AND ORDER 04 Civ (LTS) (GWG) -v.- :

Plaintiff, : OPINION AND ORDER 04 Civ (LTS) (GWG) -v.- : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X ANDREW YOUNG, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, : Plaintiff,

More information

SCC NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SHOPPING CARTS

SCC NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SHOPPING CARTS SCC NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SHOPPING CARTS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sacramento, State of California, ordains as follows: SECTION 1.

More information

Li Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G.

Li Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G. Li Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 117222/2008E Judge: Paul G. Feinman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

Matter of Kroynik v New York State Office of Temporary & Disability Assistance 2013 NY Slip Op 30912(U) April 25, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket

Matter of Kroynik v New York State Office of Temporary & Disability Assistance 2013 NY Slip Op 30912(U) April 25, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Matter of Kroynik v New York State Office of Temporary & Disability Assistance 2013 NY Slip Op 30912(U) April 25, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 402559/12 Judge: Joan B. Lobis Republished

More information

NEW YORK STATE: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of Alleged

NEW YORK STATE: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of Alleged NEW YORK STATE: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of Alleged Violations of the New York State Ruling on Department Navigation Law (ECL) article 12, Staff s Second Motion for and Title

More information

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION. Petitioner, RULING AND ORDER JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION. Petitioner, RULING AND ORDER JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON: STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION TITAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., DOCKET NO. 04-T-204 Petitioner, vs. RULING AND ORDER WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:

More information

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE AMENDING PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.16 RELATING TO SOLID WASTE COLLECTION

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE AMENDING PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.16 RELATING TO SOLID WASTE COLLECTION ORDINANCE NO. 15 007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE AMENDING PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.16 RELATING TO SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WHEREAS, state regulations related to solid waste continue

More information

Matter of DiMattia v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33033(U) October 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 85126/2018 Judge: Thomas

Matter of DiMattia v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33033(U) October 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 85126/2018 Judge: Thomas Matter of DiMattia v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33033(U) October 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 85126/2018 Judge: Thomas P. Aliotta Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 30 PEDDLERS, VENDORS AND CANVASSERS

ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 30 PEDDLERS, VENDORS AND CANVASSERS ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE Chapter 30 30-1. Permit Required. 30-1. Permit Required. 30-2. Definitions. 30-2.1. Exemption From Permit Requirements. 30-3. Application for Permit or Exemption. 30-4. Investigation

More information

: : Plaintiff Bruno Pierre ( Plaintiff ) filed this diversity action against Defendants Hilton

: : Plaintiff Bruno Pierre ( Plaintiff ) filed this diversity action against Defendants Hilton Pierre v. Hilton Rose Hall Resort & Spa et al Doc. 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ X BRUNO PIERRE, Plaintiff, -against-

More information

CITATION

CITATION Neighborhood & Community Services 707 E. Main Ave. PO Box 430 Bowling Green, KY 42102-0430 Violation of Bowling Green Code of Ordinances' Chapter 27, Property Code CITATION 2017-00000323 PVA Recorded Property

More information