Willard receives federal Universal Service Fund ( USF ) support as a cost company, not a price cap company.

Similar documents
STATE MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) )

March 20, Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

REPLY COMMENTS OF THE COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (CCIA)

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER

Federal Communications Commission DA Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ORDER

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF XO COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION P.O. BOX 3265, HARRISBURG, PA June 23, 2016

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: August 2, 2010 Released: August 2, 2010

June 30, 2011 in Courtroom B 2101 N. Lincoln Blvd., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Before Maribeth D. Snapp, Administrative Law Judge

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before The Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: October 7, 2008 Released: October 7, 2008

FCC ARMIS REPORTS - Instructions December 2004 Page 1 of 12

Congress made clear its intention that these process improvements should be more ministerial than substantive and generally uncontroversial.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION

The Ruling: 251. Interconnection. (a) General Duty of Telecommunications Carriers

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF COMPTEL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. v. ) NOTICE OF ERRATA TO PETITION FOR REVIEW

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: May 31, 2007 Released: May 31, 2007

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SECOND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION

veri on May 6, 2013 Ex Parte Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 lih Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER. Adopted: September 5, 2017 Released: September 8, 2017

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Re: MPSC Case No. U-14592, Interconnection Agreement Between SBC Michigan and PhoneCo, L.P.

STATE OF ALASKA THE ALASKA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. ation of Reform of Intrastate ) R-97-5 Interexchange Access Charge ) Rules ) ORDER NO.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS ADVOCATE Suite 1102, Commerce Building 300 North Second Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101

Dear Secretary Dortch and Commission Members: Pursuant to the notice published by the Federal Communications Commission on

Closure of FCC Lockbox Used to File Fees, Tariffs, Petitions, and Applications for

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ADOPTING ORDER. Adopted: November 15, 2012 Released: November 15, 2012

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AT&T INC. S OPPOSITION TO FCC S MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE

Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection:

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: April 5, 2016

Dear Ms. Dortch: Sincerely,. Filed via ECFS. September 29, 2011

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Interconnecting with Rural ILECs

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

Agenda Date: 12/12/16 Agenda Item: 4B TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDER OF APPROVAL

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

IMPACT OF POTENTIAL LAPSE IN FUNDING ON COMMISSION OPERATIONS

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No (and consolidated case)

B t NA L. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAl. wr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU] f FOR DITRIT Q QCLJMHA ILtUIt

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Fund. lilnited

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 654

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Beverly Jones Heydinger

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, MARCH 5, 2002

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 12 th Floor Washington, D.C October 30, 2014

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON CP 1511

STATE OF ALASKA THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC ) ) ) ) )

COMPANY Second Revised Title Sheet 1 High Point, North Carolina Canceling First Revised Title Sheet 1 Effective: April 26, 2013 THE

Nos , , Argued Oct. 2, Decided Dec. 4, 2007.

RICHARD P. SCHWEITZER, P.ULC.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF VOICES FOR INTERNET FREEDOM MEMBERS. comments in response to the Federal Communications Commission s ( FCC or

December 1, 2014 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

Review of Foreign Ownership Policies for Broadcast, Common Carrier and Aeronautical

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

224 W. Exchange Owosso, MI Phone: Fax: August 20, 2018

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

CHAPTER 5. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS

The Kennedy Privacy Law Firm

II GreenbergTraurig VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. April 18, 2013

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

BEFORE THE OREGON PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION COMMENTS OF TRACFONE WIRELESS INC.

Adopted: November 19, 1998 Released: November 20, By the Commission: Commissioner Furchtgott-Roth dissenting and issuing a statement.

BEFORE THE UNITED STATATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMl\USSION Washington D.C

November 18, Re: MPSC Case No. U-14694, Interconnection Agreement Between SBC Michigan and Arialink Telecom, LLC

ORDER NO OF OREGON UM 1058 COMMISSION AUTHORITY PREEMPTED

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC CENTURYLINK'S COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION OF TELMATE, LLC FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC No

* Electronic Copy * MS Public Service Commission * 7/24/2018 * MS Public Service Commission * Electronic

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE ALARM INDUSTRY COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE

C H A MB E R O F C O M ME R C E O F T H E U N IT E D S T A T E S OF A M E R IC A

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OPINION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

47 USC 332. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

DT NEON Connect, Inc. Petition for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services. Order Nisi Granting Authorization

STATE OF ALASKA THE ALASKA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. January 8, 2013

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF NEVADA. LCB File No. R December 19, 2007

Mark R. Ortlieb AVP-Senior Legal Counsel Legal/State Regulatory. October 26, 2017

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SECTION 332 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT: A

Transcription:

Craig J. Brown Suite 250 1099 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Phone 303-992-2503 Facsimile 303-896-1107 Senior Associate General Counsel Via ECFS December 10, 2014 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20554 Re: In the Matter of QWEST CORPORATION d/b/a CENTURYLINK QC and WILLARD TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of Study Area Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission s Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 Erratum to November 13, 2014 Joint Petition for Waiver Dear Ms. Dortch: On November 13, 2014, Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC (CenturyLink and Willard Telephone Company, Inc. (Willard filed a Joint Petition for Waiver of the definition of study area contained in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission s rules. By their Petition, CenturyLink seeks to remove a portion of its Sterling Exchange (Transfer Area, with four active subscriber lines and another four non-active subscriber locations, from its Colorado study area and for Willard to add this Transfer Area to its study area. Subsequent to the submission of the Petition and its Public Notice, 1 a textual error came to the attention of Petitioners. On page two of the Petition, in the second full paragraph, the last sentence currently reads as follows: Willard receives federal Universal Service Fund ( USF support as a cost company, not a price cap company. This sentence inadvertently contained an incorrect reference to Willard. Willard is actually an average schedule company. Petitioners accordingly correct the text on page two to replace the reference to Willard being a cost company to it being an average schedule company. Corrected, the sentence on page two now reads as follows: 1 DA 14-1672 (rel. Nov. 20, 2014. Comments are due on December 22, 2014 and Reply Comments on January 6, 2015.

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch December 10, 2014 Page 2 Willard receives federal Universal Service Fund ( USF support as an average schedule company, not a price cap company. Enclosed with this correspondence, Petitioners are re-filing their November 13, 2014 Joint Petition in its entirety. The re-filed Joint Petition continues to be dated November 13, 2014, with the corrected language on page 2 italicized (the petitioners have also noted in the footer of each page: With CORRECTED page 2. Petitioners note that this correction does not in any way affect the relief they seek, but realize the Commission may need to lengthen the cycle for Comments given the filing of this Erratum subsequent to the Petition s Public Notice. Petitioners respectfully renew their request for the Commission to find that their Petition is appropriate for streamlined treatment, as it raises no new issues of law and the supporting facts and circumstances comply with the standard for waiver set forth in the USF/ICC Transformation Order. 2 Sincerely, By: _/s/ Craig J. Brown Craig J. Brown 1099 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 250 Washington, DC 20001 303-992-2503 Craig.J.Brown@CenturyLink.com Counsel for CENTURYLINK By: _/s/ Carrie Klem Carrie Klem Willard Telephone Company 41499 HWY 71 Stoneham, CO 80754 970-228-4571 carriek@willardtell.com Counsel for WILLARD 2 Connect America Fund, A National Broadband Plan for Our Future, Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates for Local Exchange Carriers, High-Cost Universal Service Support, Developing an Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Lifeline and Link-Up, Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 26 FCC Rcd 17663, 17760-65, at 260-67 (rel. Nov. 18, 2011 ( USF/ICC Transformation Order (subsequent history omitted.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter QWEST CORPORATION d/b/a CENTURYLINK QC and WILLARD TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of Study Area Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission s Rules CC Docket No. 96-45 JOINT PETITION FOR WAIVER Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Federal Communication Commission s ( FCC or Commission rules, Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC ( CenturyLink and Willard Telephone Company, Inc. ( Willard, by and through their counsel, request a waiver of the definition of study area contained in the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission s rules. The purpose of this waiver is to allow CenturyLink to remove a portion of its Sterling Exchange (the Transfer Area, with four active subscriber lines and another four non-active subscriber locations, from its Colorado study area and for Willard to add the Transfer Area to its study area. Attachment 1 sets forth the legal description of the Transfer Area. CenturyLink is not transferring any facilities or formally transferring any customers to Willard. Petitioners respectfully request that the Commission find that this Petition is appropriate for streamlined treatment and expeditiously issue a public notice seeking comment on this joint petition for waiver so that it can go into effect in accordance with Section 36.4(a of the 1 With CORRECTED Page 2

Commission s rules. 1 No new issues of law are raised by the Petition and the supporting facts and circumstances comply with the standard for waiver set forth in the USF/ICC Transformation Order. 2 I. BACKGROUND CenturyLink is an incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC that serves Colorado, as well as other states. Together with its affiliates, CenturyLink is the largest ILEC operating in Colorado. CenturyLink s study area is referred to by the Universal Service Administrative Company ( USAC as Study Area 465102. Following the proposed transfer, CenturyLink will continue to provide local telephone service within the other areas of Colorado that it serves and will retain its study area for those exchanges. Willard is a rural telephone company providing service within its study area in Colorado, which is referred to by USAC as Study Area 462210. As of October 23, 2014, Willard was providing services to approximately 53 rural residential customers and no rural business customers in Colorado. Willard is classified as a rural telephone company and is an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier under the Communications Act of 1934 as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act. Willard receives federal Universal Service Fund ( USF support as an average schedule company, not a price cap company. 1 47 C.F.R. Part 36.4(a. 2 In the Matter of Connect America Fund, A National Broadband Plan for Our Future, Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates for Local Exchange Carriers, High-Cost Universal Service Support, Developing an Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Lifeline and Link-Up, Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 26 FCC Rcd 17663, 17760-17765, at 260-267 (rel. Nov. 18, 2011 ( USF/ICC Transformation Order (subsequent history omitted. 2 With CORRECTED Page 2

II. THE PROPOSED STUDY AREA WAIVER IS WARRANTED AND WILL SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST Petitioners seek a waiver of the frozen study area boundaries between their serving areas in Colorado. Part 36 of the Commission s Rules freezes the definition of study area to the boundaries that were in existence on November 15, 1984. 3 This freeze was due, in part, to the Commission s concern over the level of interstate cost recovery by LECs from the Universal Service Fund and was intended to ensure that LECs do not set up high cost exchanges within their existing service territories as separate study areas to maximize high cost support. 4 The Commission has recognized that changes that result from the transfer of exchanges in arms-length transactions do not necessarily raise the concerns which prompted the freeze. 5 The failure to waive the rule in such cases would produce an absurd result, forcing the transferor to continue to include exchanges in its study area for which it has no costs, and preventing the transferee from including in its study area exchanges it actually serves. 6 Such a result would not serve the Commission s policy objective of ensuring that carriers actual costs are reflected in their accounting so that they can accurately set just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory rates. 3 See 47 C.F.R. Part 36, Appendix Glossary. 4 In the Matter of US West Communications, Inc. and Eagle Telecommunications, Inc. Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of Study Area Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission s Rules and Eagle Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.41(c of the Commission s Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 1771, 1773, at 10 (rel. Jan. 5, 1995 (citations omitted. 5 See, e.g., Alltel Corporation Petition for Waiver of Section 36.125(f, Sections 36.154(e(1 and (2, and the Definition of Study Area contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission s Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7505, 7505, at 7 (rel. Dec. 14, 1990. 6 See Amendment to Part 36 to the Commission s Rules and Establishment of a Joint Board, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 5 FCC Rcd 5974, 5975-5976, at 17 (rel. Dec. 10, 1990. 3 With CORRECTED Page 2

In the USF/ICC Transformation Order, the Commission established a two-pronged test for deciding whether study area waivers should be granted: (1 the state commission having regulatory authority over the transferred exchanges does not object to the transfer, and (2 the transfer must be in the public interest. 7 The Commission further stated that the evaluation of the public interest benefits of the proposed waiver will include (1 the number of lines at issue; (2 the projected universal service fund cost per line; and (3 whether such a grant would result in consolidation of study areas that facilitates reductions in cost by taking advantage of the economies of scale, i.e., reduction in cost per line due to the increased number of lines. 8 A. The Colorado Public Utilities Commission Does Not Object to the Proposed Transfer On May 1, 2014, CenturyLink and Willard filed a joint application with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission ( Colorado Commission to revise portions of each company s operating area, replace CenturyLink with Willard as the carrier of last resort in the Transfer Area, and address other matters related to implementing these changes. 9 In an Order dated July 25, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge for the Colorado Commission granted the parties joint application. By its terms, that order was deemed approved by the Colorado Commission on 7 USF/ICC Transformation Order, 26 FCC Rcd at 17762, at 265. 8 Id. The Commission stressed, however, that these factors are guidelines and not rigid measures for evaluating a petition for study area waiver. 9 In the Matter of the Joint Application of Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC ( CenturyLink QC and Willard Telephone Company to Rearrange Their Exchange Area Boundaries and CenturyLink QC s Application to Relinquish Designation as Provider of Last Resort and CenturyLink QC s Petition for a Waiver from Compliance with the Commission s Requirement that Newspaper Notice Be Published Concerning the Relinquishment of Its Provider of Last Resort Obligations, Joint Verified Application of CenturyLink QC and Willard Telephone Company, Proceeding No. 14A-0408T, Decision No. R14-0888 (filed May 1, 2014 (Colorado PUC Application (attached as Attachment 2. 4 With CORRECTED Page 2

August 14, 2014. The Order noted that the parties would be filing this petition, as well as a Section 214 application, for this Commission s approval prior to closing the transaction. 10 Attachment 2 is a copy of the Colorado Commission s Order. B. The Public Interest Will Be Served By Grant Of The Requested Study Area Waiver As stated in the USF/ICC Transformation Order, the first two factors to be considered in determining whether a study area waiver is in the public interest are the number of lines at issue and the projected universal service fund cost per line. Here, there are only eight customer locations at issue, with CenturyLink currently serving four of those locations. CenturyLink does not currently receive any universal service support for the Transfer Area. If the study area waiver is granted, Willard will at most receive $6.50 per line per month for federal high-cost support for 61 lines of support. Given that the high-cost fund is frozen, there will be very little impact on overall support mechanism levels. The third factor in determining whether a waiver is in the public interest is whether such a grant would result in consolidation of study areas that facilitates reductions in cost by taking advantage of the economies of scale, i.e., reduction in cost per line due to the increased number 10 In the Matter of the Joint Application of Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC ( CenturyLink QC and Willard Telephone Company to Rearrange Their Exchange Area Boundaries and CenturyLink QC s Application to Relinquish Designation as Provider of Last Resort and CenturyLink QC s Petition for a Waiver from Compliance with the Commission s Requirement that Newspaper Notice Be Published Concerning the Relinquishment of Its Provider of Last Resort Obligations, Recommended Decision of Administrative Law Judge Robert I. Garvey Dismissing Intervention and Granting Application for Approval of Rearranged Exchange Area Boundries and For Approval to Change Each Provider s Designation as Provider of Last Resort; Requiring the Filing of Advice Letters; and Granting Waiver of the Commission s Newspaper Notice Rule, Proceeding No. 14A-0408T, Decision No. R14-0888, (Colo. Pub. Utils. Comm n July 25, 2014. CenturyLink has separately filed an application pursuant to Section 214 to discontinue service in the Transfer Area. See In the Matter of Section 63.71 Application of CenturyLink for Authority to Discontinue Service to the Sterling, CO Exchange, Section 63.71 Application (filed Nov. 13, 2014. 5 With CORRECTED Page 2

of lines. In this case, granting the waiver will lead to a reduction in the cost of serving customers. CenturyLink does not have facilities to provide more than basic service to the Transfer Area. Given that this area is on the extreme portion of CenturyLink s Sterling Wire Center but is in close proximity to Willard s facilities, Willard believes it can serve the area in a more economical manner, offering additional services to the affected locations. As noted, all of the affected customers have expressed support for the proposed transfer. 6 With CORRECTED Page 2

III. CONCLUSION For the reasons above, Petitioners respectfully request that the Commission find that Petitioners have filed a complete petition for study area waiver and that the petition is appropriate for streamlined treatment, and that the Commission expeditiously issue a public notice seeking comment on this joint petition for waiver so that it can go into effect in accordance with Section 36.4(a of the Commission s rules. Respectfully submitted, CENTURYLINK By: _/s/ Craig J. Brown Craig J. Brown Attorney for CenturyLink 1099 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 250 Washington, DC 20001 303-992-2503 Craig.J.Brown@CenturyLink.com WILLARD By: _/s/ Carrie Klem Carrie Klem Willard Telephone Company 41499 HWY 71 Stoneham, CO 80754 970-228-4571 carriek@willardtell.com November _13_, 2014 7 With CORRECTED Page 2

CenturyLink Attachment 1

CenturyLink Attachment 2 Colorado PUC E-Filings System

CenturyLink Attachment 2

CenturyLink Attachment 2

CenturyLink Attachment 2

CenturyLink Attachment 2

CenturyLink Attachment 2