A Memorandum of Agreement Between the Suquamish Tribe And The Department Of Defense/Army Corps Of Engineers Six Years Of Perseverance

Similar documents
Military Installation Real Property and Services: Proposed Legislation in the 111 th Congress

Policy Issues at Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Frequently Asked State Questions August 2010

Program Overview Grants to Tribal Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Coalitions Program

Case 1:08-cv RPM Document 85 Filed 06/19/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

WHEREAS, the Projects lie within the States of South Carolina and Georgia; and,

American Indian & Alaska Native. Tribal Government Policy

SECTION 611 (42 U.S.C. 3057b) PART A--INDIAN PROGRAMFINDINGS

June 2013 Hurricane Sandy Relief Act Includes Changes to Expedite Future Disaster Recovery

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals

ANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FILERS

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 25 - INDIANS CHAPTER 42 AMERICAN INDIAN TRUST FUND MANAGEMENT REFORM

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

National Congress of American Indians SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT AS ENACTED - WITH NOTES FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Enacting and Enforcing Tribal Law to Protect and Restore Natural Resources Part 1: Tribal Law and How it Works RICHARD A. DU BEY

US Army Corps of Engineers Draft

PROVIDING FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES AND THE REPATRIATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN REMAINS AND CULTURAL PATRIMONY

EPA-Funded What s Upstream? Advocacy Campaign Did Not Violate Lobbying Prohibitions

United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. Post Office Box 1306 Albuquerque, New Mexico DEC 0 S 2016

TITLE 44 PUBLIC PRINTING AND DOCUMENTS

Professor Matthew L.M. Fletcher Former Staff Attorney for Suquamish Tribe

LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY UPDATE DIRECT SERVICE TRIBES ANNUAL CONFERENCE JULY 11, 2018

SUMMARY; The National Park Service announces two telephonic government-to-government

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 152 Filed 03/30/18 Page 1 of 5 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Oversight Hearing on Finding Our Way Home: Achieving the Policy Goals of NAGPRA June 16, 2011

SINGLE AUDIT ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1996

ACCG Federal Update. Shawna Watley January 31, Copyright 2009 Holland & Knight LLP All Rights Reserved

FACT SHEET Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works Announces Tribal Initiatives

NATIVE AMERICAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, TRADE PROMOTION, AND TOURISM ACT OF 2000

CAL/EPA POLICY MEMORANDUM NUMBER:

7.2c- The Cabinet (NROC)

ENRD Deputy Assistant Attorneys General and Section Chiefs. Jeffrey H. Wood, Acting Assistant Attorney General

Final WHBE Tribal Consultation Policy

Deportation of Parents of U.S.-Born Citizens

COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES

COMMUNITY FOREST AND OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Department of Veterans Affairs VA Directive 8603 CONSULTATION AND VISITATION WITH AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKAN NATIVES

Opportunities for Tribal State Collaboration Alaska Tribal Court Conference Fairbanks 2016

STANDING RULES OF ORDER

CRS Report for Congress

FY 2014 Omnibus Spending Bill Restores Some Funds to Tribal Programs Bill Rejects Contract Support Costs Caps Proposal

In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

Native American Graves Protection and. Repatriation Act

Report to Congress On Contract Support Cost Funding in Indian Self-Determination Contracts and Compacts. In Response to: House Report No.

HOW TO TALK TO CONGRESS 101

Update on Legislative and Administrative Priorities in 2018 January 22, 2018

Introduction to AUCD Advocacy

THE NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INDIAN EDUCATION LEGAL SUPPORT PROJECT. Tribalizing Indian Education

3.2 Assignments and Assumptions of Responsibilities to Comply with Federal Environmental laws Other Than NEPA

Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470) 1

SENATE BILL No. 808 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 24, Introduced by Senator Mendoza. February 17, 2017

Risk Assessments and Hazardous Waste Cleanup in Indian Country: The Role of the Federal-Indian Trust Relationship

IV. RECOMMENDATIONS. A. General Themes

Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program

This Week in Congress: Human Trafficking Legislation

Case 2:11-cv JAM-KJN Document 70 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 5

Effective Communications with Congressional Staff

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

The Florida Legislature

Tribal Law and Order Act Indian Alcohol and Substance Abuse Memorandum of Agreement Federal Register Publication

February 4, 2011 GENERAL MEMORANDUM Department of the Interior Releases Draft Tribal Consultation Policy

When used in sections 371, 376, 377, 412, 417, 433, 462, 466, 478, 493, 494, 500, 501, and 526 of this title

MAINE REPUBLICAN PARTY BYLAWS. Adopted March 11, 1985 Amended June 14, 2014

a GAO GAO INDIAN ISSUES Analysis of the Crow Creek Sioux and Lower Brule Sioux Tribes Additional Compensation Claims

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

2010 Tribal Law and Order Act

5.j REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE LOCAL REUSE AUTHORITY TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL SITTING AS THE LOCAL REUSE AUTHORITY:

AGENDA 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS 3. ADOPTION OF AGENDA [1]

2017), at , available at (last visited Dec. 11, 2017).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. ) No. 1:02 CV 2156 (RWR) DEFENDANTS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Congress and the Budget: 2016 Actions and Events

COLORADO PLATEAU COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT ONE TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between NAVAJO NATION.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:05-cr PLF Document 167 Filed 10/08/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD CHARTER & BYLAWS ADOPTED NOVEMBER

SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD

Self-Governance Negotiation Process

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDERS, MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMANDS

Government Accountability Office The Congressional Watchdog. Office of Congressional Relations (202)

Reports produced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) for Congress between Nov and June 2010 and not posted online, 2010

Principles of Fiscal Law and Government Contracts-Related Funding Issues Joseph G. Martinez K. Tyler Thomas

Stand Up For California! "Citizens making a difference"

SHPO Guidelines for Tribal Government Consultations in National Historic Preservation Act Decision Making Processes

PUBLIC LAW NOV. 29, 1990 Public Law st Congress An Act

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Contract Management Agency INSTRUCTION. Funds Control

State Refugee Resettlement Bills Tennessee Senate Bill 1325 (2013)

The Honorable Phil Mendelson Chairman Council ofthe District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Suite 410 Washington, D.C.

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

IEEE-USA CONGRESSIONAL FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Weekl. Authority. session this human trafficking. also. be a vote on. Last deal will be. good timing

CONSTITUTION. Of the AFFILIATED TRIBES OF NORTHWEST INDIANS PREAMBLE

Sec. 470a. Historic preservation program

Antideficiency Act Violations Reporting Requirements

PUBLIC LAW OCT. 3, STAT. 3765

Statement of. L. Britt Snider. Subcommittee on Intelligence Community Management House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR CHRISTOPHER S. BOND; (as prepared)

THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN

Transcription:

A Memorandum of Agreement Between the Suquamish Tribe And The Department Of Defense/Army Corps Of Engineers Six Years Of Perseverance May 1991 The Suquamish Tribe notified the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE), Washington, D.C., of the Tribe's interest of entering into an agreement under the Defense-State Memorandum of Agreement/Cooperative Agreement program (DSMOA/CA). November 1991 Tribal staff attended a DoD Environmental Workshop in Texas, at the invitation of ACE-HQ. Representatives from DoD, States, ACE-HQ, and other Federal agencies attended the workshop. The Suquamish Tribe was the first Tribe invited to the workshop. March 1992 DoD s general counsel delayed the DSMOA/CA process, so the Tribe submitted a Cooperative Agreement application directly to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Environment). May 1992 A formal meeting regarding the Tribe s application/request was held between the Tribal Chairwoman, Congressional, DoD and ACE representatives at the Pentagon. A few weeks after the meeting, the Tribe was notified that DoD was unable to act favorably on the their request. The reason given was that the definition of State did not extend to Indian Tribes under the regulations/code governing the DSMOA/CA program. The Section quoted 10 U.S.C. 2701(d) stated that the Secretary of Defense may enter into agreements with any other Federal agency or with any State or local government. As a result of the letter, the Tribe decided to work for an amendment of 10 U.S.C. 2701(d) to specifically include American Indians and Alaska Natives. April 1993 Senator John McCain sent a letter to the Secretary of Defense expressing concern at the apparent lack of cooperation between DoD and Federally recognized Tribes. In this letter, he enclosed the Suquamish Tribe's Cooperative Agreement application cover letter and DoD s response. The senator expressed hope that DoD would be able to accommodate the request of the Tribe.

May 1993 The Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security), sent a letter to the Senator in response to his letter. In her response, she stated that DoD was... "pursuing ways to include Tribes such as the Suquamish in appropriate cleanup activities", and that DoD was "also reviewing how to incorporate Tribes in our Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement Program". The Suquamish presented a resolution to the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians to support the amendment of 10 U.S.C. 2701(d) to specifically include Tribes. The resolution passed. June 1993 Senators McCain and Daniel Inouye (Vice Chairman and Chairman for the Select Committee on Indian Affairs) sent a letter to Senators Sam Nunn and Strom Thurmond (Chairman and Ranking Minority Member for the Senate Armed Services Committee) requesting that the Committee on Armed Services take action to amend 10 U.S.C. 2701(d) during its consideration of the defense authorization bill for fiscal year 1994. September 1993 The Tribal Chairman, a Tribal Council member, and staff met formally with the Minority Counsel for the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, the Majority Legal Counsel for the Senate Armed Forces Committee and legislative aides. During these discussions it was determined that the amendment would not be included in the authorization bill. April 1994 The Tribal Chairman and Tribal Council members met with the Majority Legal Counsel for the Senate Armed Forces Committee, a staff member for the House Committee on Armed Services and legislative aides. During these discussions, it was determined that the amendment to include Tribes in 10 U.S.C. 2701 would be included in the defense authorization bill July and August 1994 The Senate approved the amendment, and the bill went to a conference committee with the House. The House passed the conference report with the amendment. September 1994 Congress enacted the provisions relating to Tribes, and the Suquamish contacted the ACE-HQ to restart the process.

December 1994 The Tribal Chairman sent a letter to DoD requesting information on the status of their request to enter into an MOA/CA. March 1995 A Tribal Council member and staff met with representatives from DoD and ACE-HQ to enter into an agreement; however, ACE-HQ still required a determination from DoD general counsel prior to initiating a MOA with the Tribe. April 1995 DoD general counsel informed DoD/ACE-HQ that the amendment to 10 U.S.C. 2701(d) clears the way to negotiate an MOA with the Suquamish Tribe. July 1995 The Tribe submitted a draft MOA between the Suquamish and the Department of Defense to ACE-HQ. August 1995 The Tribe was notified that proposed language in a Senate Bill was going to reduce the program funds available by 75%. As a consequence, DoD/ACE-HQ actions on the draft MOA were suspended until the program budget for FY 96 were known. January 1996 The Tribe was notified of the DSMOA program budget for FY96 and discussed Tribal budget needs ACE- HQ for participation. By February, DoD agreed to proceed with the MOA process and informed ACE-HQ. March 1996 The Suquamish were notified by ACE-HQ that the language that allowed the Secretary of Defense to enter into agreements with Indian Tribes had been subsequently removed from 10 U.S.C. 2701(d) and from a new Conference Report. Consequently, the MOA process was at another standstill. May 1996 The Suquamish Tribe was informed that the Senate Armed Services Committee was going initiate an amendment to 10 U.S.C. 2701(d); the amendment would reinstate Tribes as an entity eligible for reimbursement in Defense environmental restoration activities. The Tribe was also advised that the Committee supported a DoD and Suquamish Memorandum of Agreement/Cooperative Agreement for FY 1996 The Tribe sent a letter to DoD with the information stated above. They requested that negotiations to fund the Suquamish during FY 1996 be resumed and that the DoD environmental restoration budget for FY 1997 include the Tribe. June 1996 The Tribe was informed that the DoD and ACE-HQ did not have the authority to work on a Suquamish/DoD MOA under 10 U.S.C. 2701(d), since the amendment was not official. By mid-june, the Senate approved the amendment to include Tribes as an entity eligible for reimbursement in Defense environmental restoration activities. September 1996 The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 amended 10 U.S.C. 2701(d) and reinstated Tribes as an entity eligible for reimbursement in Defense environmental restoration activities. The Suquamish contacted ACE-HQ to re-initiate discussions on the draft MOA between the Tribe and the Department of Defense. ACE-HQ informed the Tribe that they could not pursue issues further until a meeting on the MOA was held between ACE-HQ and DoD staff. It was projected that the meeting would be held in October 1996. October 1996

DoD informed the Tribe that certain issues needed to be resolved with the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Environmental Clean-up. November 1996 The Tribe was informed that discussions on a MOA with the Suquamish could begin and other military entities would be invited to participate. These discussions were not scheduled to begin until January of 1997, however. The Tribe contacted ACE-HQ and expressed a strong desire to begin discussions on the MOA prior to January 1997. The Tribe was informed by ACE-HQ that internal discussions between the military services concerning the DoD-Suquamish Tribe Memorandum of Agreement were necessary before they could meet with the Tribe. The ACE also stated that it had no idea when issues would be resolved. December 1996 DoD informed the Tribe that the military services representative requested additional information about the MOA and raised issues that required the involvement of DoD general counsel. DoD did not anticipate that anything would happen until early 1997. March 1997 Senator Patty Murray and Representative Norm Dicks cosigned a letter to the Secretary of the Army, requesting assistance in resolving the MOA issue with the Suquamish Tribe. They urged the Department to direct the Corps to reenter negotiations with the Suquamish Tribe immediately. April 1997 DoD informed the Tribe that the Army was preparing a response to Senator Murray s and Representative Dicks letter; DoD would coordinate with the Army on the response, which was supposed to be completed by mid-april. Letter from the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) was sent. It acknowledged Senator Murray/Congressman Dicks letter and stated I regret that your request requires additional research and coordination which precludes my providing you an immediate reply. Another letter, this time from the Department of the Army Congressional Actions Coordinator - Congressional Inquiry Division, was also sent to the concerning the MOA issue. This letter stated that Inquiry into this matter has been initiated. The Tribe was informed that Army representatives were investigating the history of the issue with ACE- HQ. May 1997 Another letter from the Department of the Army Congressional Actions Coordinator - Congressional Inquiry Division was sent to Senator Murray concerning the Suquamish MOA issue. This letter stated that Inquiry into this matter is taking more time than expected.... As soon as information becomes available upon which to base a reply, I will advise you further. July 1997 After six years of exercises in futility, the Suquamish Tribal Chairman sent a letter to the Vice President on Defense Department practices regarding Indian Tribes and the environment. Senator Murray, frustrated by the sequence of events, sent another letter to the Secretary of the Army requesting assistance in resolving the MOA issue with the Suquamish. In her letter the Senator stated I fail to understand the apparent difficulties the Department is having resolving this relatively simple issue.... I again reiterate my interest in the Corps entering into a DTMOA with the Suquamish Tribe. August 1997 Department of the Army s Acting Chief of the Environmental Division - Directorate of Military Programs sent a letter to the Suquamish Tribal Chairman. The letter acknowledged the Tribe s letter to the Vice

President and stated that a final response on the MOA issue would be provided within 30 days. That response directed the DoD/ACE-HQ to begin the MOA process, again. October December 1998 After many more meetings and discussions, the MOA was finalized and signed, almost eight years after the Suquamish made their first inquiry. During the years the Tribe struggled with DoD/ACE-HQ, staff from the ACE Seattle District provided both technical advice and emotional support. ACE staff met with Tribal staff as part of an ongoing, informal consultation process that was strengthened over the years it took to get the MOA. This informal process continues to this day.