IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION No. 1:15-CV-559 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Plaintiffs, No. 1:15-cv-00399

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Plaintiffs, No. 1:15-cv-00399

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Consolidated Civil Action ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

COUNTY OF GORDON. This Agreement is made as of the of, 2013, by and between Gordon

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO DIVISION Case No.: 1:17-cv WO/JLW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-CV TDS-JEP. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA PLAINTIFFS PROPOSED QUESTIONS FOR THE SPECIAL MASTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-CV ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-CV ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-1113

COUNTY OF JOHNSTON, Plaintiff v. CITY OF WILSON, Defendant No. COA (Filed 7 March 2000)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 November 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 11-C-1128 DECLARATION OF MICHAEL HAAS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (5:15-cv D)

MOTIONS BY ALL HVJT DEFENDANTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:16-CV-1164 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MARGARET DICKSON, et al., ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) 11 CVS ) ROBERT RUCHO, et al., ) Defendants )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL NO. 4:86CV00291

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW

Adams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1319 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

3 2fl17 (0:9901. Colorado Secretary of State Be it Enacted by the People ofthe State ofcolorado:

South Dakota Constitution

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 1:15-CV-399 ) ) ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : :

(131st General Assembly) (Amended House Bill Number 153) AN ACT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

ESSB H COMM AMD By Committee on State Government, Elections & Information Technology

PLAN OF ORGANIZATION THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE ARTICLE I NAME

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 3:14-cv-213 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS } } } } } EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

(a) Short <<NOTE: 42 USC note.>> Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Help America Vote Act of 2002''.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1995 SESSION CHAPTER 461 HOUSE BILL 1060

CLAY COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER Interim Edition

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

The City of Ypsilanti Notice of Adopted Ordinance Ordinance No. 1256

BY-LAWS OF THE AUGUSTA COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

12 CVS. Scenic NC, Inc., ) Plaintiff ) ) ) North Carolina Department of MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. ) Transportation, ) Defendant )

AMENDED CHARTER OF THE CITY OF WAUCHULA, COUNTY OF HARDEE, STATE OF FLORIDA 2004

The City of Ypsilanti Adopted Ordinance Ordinance No. 1256

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-CV ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 53 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

NUMBERED MEMO

CARLISLE HOME RULE CHARTER. ARTICLE I General Provisions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State AFFIDAVIT OF CANDIDACY

To coordinate, encourage, and assist county growth through the County central committees,

PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

HOUSE BILL No AN ACT concerning city-county consolidation; authorizing the consolidation of the city of Wichita and Sedgwick county.

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

SECRETARY OF STATE S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. (hereinafter the Secretary ) hereby submits his Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

2018 JOINT PRIMARY ELECTION SERVICES CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICER STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW

Home Rule Charter. Approved by Hillsborough County Voters September Amended by Hillsborough County Voters November 2002, 2004, and 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Snell & Wilmer IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Colorado Secretary of State Toni Larson League of Women Voters of Colorado 1410 Grant, Suite B204, Denver, Co Toni.Larsongmail.

Redistricting and North Carolina Elections Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Michigan Recall Procedures -- A General Overview --

Case 2:12-cv JLH-LRS-SWW Document 88 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, Plaintiff A. Donald McEachin, Senator of Virginia, by counsel, and for

Case 3:04-cv JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Charter Changes by Ordinance

Assembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections

3 GCA ELECTIONS CH. 15 CONDUCT OF PRIMARY ELECTIONS

Case: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs the North Carolina State Conference for the National Association for the

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. SUSAN WATERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees.

2016 Primary ELECTION DATE: 03/15/2016

Case 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 224 Filed 07/05/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv DGC Document 36-1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT A

CHARTER [1] Footnotes: --- (1) --- Section 1 - HOME RULE CHARTER. Page 1

INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

After the Blanket Primary Reforming Washington's Primary Election Sytem

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

City Charter. Mankato City Charter Section 2. 07: Vacancies, Forfeiture of Office, Filling of Vacancies. Page 1 of 1

BYLAWS OF THE CITY COMMITTEE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA

March 1 Census Bureau ships North Carolina's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders. June 17 Republicans release redistricting

SECTION 1. HOME RULE CHARTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:15-CV ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Plaintiffs, current and former governors of the State of North Carolina, by and through

REPUBLICAN PARTY COUNTY PLAN OF ORGANIZATION CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA PREAMBLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE CHEROKEE NATION PETITION CHALLENGING ELECTION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS

PLAN OF ORGANIZATION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, INC.

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

Transcription:

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION No. 1:15-CV-559 THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, LEWIS A. BRANDON III, JOYCE JOHNSON, NELSON JOHNSON, RICHARD ALAN KORITZ, SANDRA SELF KORITZ, AND CHARLI MAE SYKES, vs. Plaintiffs, GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Defendants. DEFENDANT'S BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT, MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND REQUESTS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF NOW COMES Defendant Guilford County Board of Elections stating its position regarding the Plaintiff's Complaint filed on July 13, 2015, including requests for temporary and permanent injunctive relief and the Plaintiffs' Motions for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction, as follows: I. BACKGROUND On July 2, 2015, eleven (11 days before the Plaintiffs filed this action, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a local act, referred to in the Plaintiff s Complaint as the Greensboro Act. 2015 N.C. Sess. Laws 138. The Greensboro Act, inter alia, set out a new redistricting plan for the cities of Greensboro and Trinity, located respectively in Guilford and Randolph counties.

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 14 Defendant Guilford County Board of Elections is required by N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-1 et seq. to conduct fair, impartial, and lawful elections within the county. In that capacity, Defendant acknowledges that it is a necessary party to this action. In order to carry out its mandate to hold the required elections, it is the opinion of Defendant that it must inform the Court of the necessary processes and appropriate timetables in which it could carry out its statutory duties. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-284 (2011. II. QUESTION PRESENTED The issue before this Court concerns the definition of the role of Guilford County Board of Elections as the sole defendant in this matter, and the appropriate remedy in light of the Plaintiffs Complaint and request for temporary and permanent injunctive relief. III. ARGUMENTS A. THE GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS SERVES A VITAL, BUT STATUTORILY LIMITED, ROLE TO CONDUCT ELECTIONS IN A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL MANNER AND, THUS, PERFORMS A SOLELY ADMINISTRATIVE OR MINISTERIAL FUNCTION. Generally speaking, county boards of elections (hereinafter, also sometimes referred to interchangeably as local boards of elections conduct all elections in North Carolina in their respective jurisdictions. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-33 (2013. The North Carolina General Statutes authorize two types of elections: (1 regular elections of candidates to office, and (2 special elections. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-1 (2015. In conducting those elections, county boards of elections, including the Guilford County 2

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 3 of 14 Board of Elections, are mandated by North Carolina statutes to conduct fair, impartial, and lawful elections in Guilford County. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-166.5 (2002. Further, county boards of elections, including the Guilford County Board of Elections, must act within the regulations and directions of the State Board of Elections (hereinafter, State Board and is subject to review by the state board. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-22 (2012. 1. The Guilford County Board of Elections is a local board of elections that has statutory authority and duties that are limited in scope as prescribed under N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-33 (2013. The Guilford County Board of Elections, like all local boards of elections, does not have discretionary authority in implementation of election rules, regulations, and procedures. By statute, the State Board of Elections has general supervision over the primaries and elections in this State and has the overall responsibility for elections. Id. The duties of the county board of elections fall into the limited categories of administrative duties and quasi-judicial duties in which the county boards of elections are restricted to the following activities: (1 Make and issue rules, regulations, and instructions consistent with directives from the State Board pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-132.4; (2 Appoint all chief judges, judges, assistants, and other officers of elections, and designate the respective precincts; (3 Hear protests about election irregularities and complaints about election officials; (4 Establish, define, provide, rearrange, discontinue and combine election precincts, provide places for registration and for holding primaries and elections; (5 determine the sufficiency of petitions; (6 Advertise and contract for printing of ballots and other election supplies; (7 Provide for the purchase, preservation, 3

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 4 of 14 and maintenance of voting booths, and other election equipment and documents; (8 Provide for issuance of all notices, advertisements, and publications concerning elections required by law; (9 Receive returns of primaries and elections, canvass returns, and issuing certificates of election enabling candidates to take office; (10 Appoint and remove the board s clerk, assistant clerks, and other employees as well as precinct transfer assistants; (11 Prepare and submit budget estimates for cost of elections for ensuing fiscal year; (12 Perform its duties under Chapter 163 and as directed by the State Board; hearing challenges to voter registration; (13 Maintain access to ballot boxes, and any other election related materials and equipment; and (14 Make available forms concerning deceased voters. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-33 (2013. In general, county boards of elections are prohibited from acting inconsistent with law or the rules established by the State Board of Elections. Republican Party of North Carolina v. Martin, 682 F. Supp. 834, (M.D.N.C. 1988, rev d on other grounds, 865 F.2d 1259 (4th Cir. 1988(reversing, on appeal, denial of the motion to intervene; see also, N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-33 (2013. 2. The Guilford County Board of Elections is mandated by statute to act in an efficient, impartial, and honest manner concerning election administration. County boards of elections are directed, by the North Carolina statutes and under the rules promulgated by the State Board, to maintain The appearance as well as the reality of care, efficiency, impartiality, and honest election administration. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-166.5 (2002 (emphasis added. It is important to note the dual mandate to 4

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 5 of 14 not only fulfill its role to administer elections in an impartial manner, but to maintain the appearance and the reality of impartiality. The importance of public confidence that local elections are conducted in such a manner and by individuals who have no partisan agenda in fact, whom have no agenda at all, but are fair, impartial and lawful cannot be overemphasized or overstated. Perhaps, the best illustration of this is to consider how impartial an election would be considered if Defendant took a stand, any stand, on the underlying constitutionality issue and this Court ruled otherwise. In administration of elections, the Guilford County Board of Elections, in acting impartial and in a nonpartisan manner, also holds its Team Members to the same standard of care, efficiency, impartiality and honest election administration. In training of the Team Members, the local boards of election are mandated by the State Board to ensure that Team Members provide voter assistance in a nonpartisan manner, will not attempt to influence any decision of a voter being provided any type of assistance, and will not wear any clothing or pins with political messages while assisting voters. 08 N.C. Admin. Code 16.0103 (2015. Therefore, local boards of elections must conduct themselves as administrators or stewards of the statutes and rules for conducting elections; it is not, and cannot, function in a policy-making role in lieu of or in addition to its ministerial function in conducting elections. 3. The Guilford County Board of Elections performs only a ministerial role regarding elections conducted in its precincts. The essential role of the local board of elections, including the Guilford County Board of Elections, is specific and narrow. The county boards of elections have no 5

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 6 of 14 authority to act in a manner inconsistent with the statutes governing elections and are merely acting in a ministerial capacity and can only carry out duties as detailed by statute and the State Board. Martin, 682 F. Supp. 834 at 835. To the extent that the Plaintiffs seek redress from the Guilford County Board of Elections outside election administration, it is superfluous since the Guilford County Board of Elections exercises virtually no discretion in the implementation of stated law and act only in a ministerial capacity. Id. B. THE GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS MAY BE A NECESSARY DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION, BUT ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY TEMPORARY AND/OR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ISSUED BY THE COURT WILL ISSUE DIRECTLY TO THIS LOCAL BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN CARRYING OUT ITS MINISTERIAL DUTIES, BUT NOT TO THE EXTENT THAT GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS CAN PROVIDE ANY REMEDY REGARDING HOUSE BILL 263 (NOW, 2015 N.C. SESS. LAWS 138. Defendant does not contest that it may be a necessary party, at least to the extent necessary to implement any election to be conducted pursuant to the orders of this Court. 1 However, any mandates directed to more appropriate entities, which should be parties to this case, will derive the same effect and in a more practical manner. The role of the State Board is to have general supervision over the primaries and elections in this State and to make such reasonable rules and regulations with respect to the conduct of primaries and elections, not in contradiction with other provisions of 1 It is incumbent upon Defendant to note the case law, including Martin, supra, which suggests a contrary conclusion. Martin did, in fact, dismiss the local board of election as a party. 6

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 7 of 14 Chapter 163, and to make recommendations to the Governor and legislature relative to the conduct and administration of the primaries and elections in the State as it may deem advisable. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-22 (2009. Pursuant to those duties of the State Board as outlined, the local boards of election do not possess and are not authorized by statute to influence policies or procedures regarding primaries and elections administration. Further, the State Board is authorized by statute to assist any county board of elections in any matter in which litigation is contemplated or has been initiated to provide assistance to in that litigation in which uniform administration of Chapter 163 of the North Carolina General Statutes has been, or would be, threatened. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-25 (2011. Further, the State Board has the authority to promulgate reasonable interim temporary rules and regulations regarding elections administration in the event that any State election law is held unconstitutional or invalid by a State or federal court or is unenforceable because of objection interposed by the United States Justice Department under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and such ruling adversely affects the conduct and holding of any pending primary or election. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-22.2 (1986. The State Board is also authorized, upon recommendation of the North Carolina Attorney General (hereinafter, Attorney General, to enter into agreement with the courts in lieu of protracted litigation until such time as the General Assembly convenes. Id. Additionally, the North Carolina Attorney General (hereinafter, Attorney General is mandated under North Carolina law to provide the State Board with legal assistance in the execution of its authority or to recommend private counsel. Id. 7

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 8 of 14 The case law does, however, present interesting questions for this Court to consider. In Republican Party v. Martin, the court upheld the dismissal of the local Boards of Election (including, interestingly, the Guilford County board of Election as superfluous to the matter seeking the inclusion of certain candidates on the local ballots since the local boards must merely follow the guidance and mandates established by the General Assembly and the State Board of Elections. Id. However, in Wright v. North Carolina, Plaintiffs, in an action seeking, as the Plaintiff seek here, to challenge a local bill redistricting matter in Wake County sought to add the Governor, the Senate President Pro Tem and the Speaker for the House. Wright v. North Carolina, 787 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2014. The court in Wright found that the General Assembly officials were not necessary parties and further opined in dicta that the Governor was also not a necessary party. Taken together and read broadly, these cases present an apparent anomaly: local Boards of Elections are not necessary parties since they have no authority to act other than required by rule or statute (Martin while the parties with authority, i.e., the General Assembly and the State, are not necessary parties since they lack a special duty to enforce the challenged Session law. (Wright, 787 F.3d at 262. Perhaps in partial response to this anomaly, in 2013 the General Assembly amended legislation which states that the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tem of the Senate have joint standing as agents of the state in any court case that challenges a state statute or a provision of the North Carolina Constitution. 2014 N.C. Sess. Laws 115. While this statute has clear implications in North Carolina 8

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 9 of 14 Courts, it is less impactful for Federal Court and can serve as no more than a clear statement of intent in this Court s analysis of necessary and permissive parties. Upon more careful analysis, this apparent anomaly is less acute than it may appear. The relief sought in Martin did not require local Boards of Elections to be subject to injunctive relief or other mandate from the court to be successfully resolved; such is clearly not the case here. Even taking the ministerial role of Defendant Guilford County Board of Elections, it will be subject to some form of injunctive relief regarding implementation of its duties whether in the form of an actual injunction from this Court or in the form of temporary rules issued by the State Board of Elections. The Guilford County Board of Elections does not opine in this Brief as to whether there are other necessary parties but does wish to state its position that it has no objection to the inclusion of any appropriate additional parties. C. DEFENDANT S ROLE OF CONDUCTING ELECTIONS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE INSTANT MATTER. The Defendant intends to provide such information as this Court deems necessary to ensure fair, impartial and lawful election as the Court conducts the proceedings in this case and provides guidance to the parties. In order to carry out a proper election, the Guilford County Board of Elections must ensure compliance with the following tasks that adhere to statutory deadlines (or other administrative deadlines: 1. Absentee ballots, for civilian and military/overseas voters, must be available at least 30 days prior to any election, per N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-302(b. 9

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 10 of 14 2. Guilford County Board of Elections staff will need, at minimum, twelve (12 business days to prepare, proof, seek approval from the State Board, pursuant to 163-165.3(a, thoroughly test ballots, and print ballots (either in house or through a vendor. 3. Notice of election, including date, nature of election, and issues submitted to voters, must be published three times (3x once per week in the twenty (20 day period preceding the close of books for an election which occurs twentyfive (25 days prior to the election. N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-33(8 basically gives a forty-five (45 to thirty-eight (38 day window for the first legal advertisement to be placed regarding the October 6th election. D. OTHER ISSUES REQUIRING ATTENTION The intent of Guilford County Board of Elections is to provide to this Court with such demographic information and statistics that may be necessarily relevant to the issues presented to the Court in this matter. The Guilford County Board of Elections prepares, as part of its regular elections administration, the following information that may be relevant to this instant matter. There are additional crucial factors that the Court may find useful in reaching any determinations in this matter. There will be no, or very minimal, cost increases in administering this election under either new or old statutory constructions even if changes are made at a late date but before filing is over. However, holding an election, invalidating the results, and conducting another election will have substantial additional 10

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 11 of 14 costs (double the cost. The City of Greensboro reimburses the Guilford County Board of Elections for one hundred percent (100% of direct costs to administer the election pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 163-284. The Guilford County Board of Elections can revert to the old districts with a few hours notice prior to any filing date. Once actions in the first section of this document have begun, change will be very difficult and challenging. Though not statutorily required, postcards with the new districts would be mailed to all city voters at a cost to the Guilford County Board of Elections of approximately ninety-thousand dollars and 00/100 cents ($90,000.00 for which the City of Greensboro would be invoiced. Under different circumstances than this lawsuit, North Carolina law does allow the movement of municipal elections into the next year s election schedule pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 160A-23.1(d. If necessary, filing could be accomplished in less than one (1 week, as long as the August 7, 2015 deadline is retained. House Bill 263 changes the city council terms from 2-year to 4-year terms (Sec 2.(c of the HB263; however, the terms are not staggered. House Bill 263 formulates those changes through the city charter (Section 3.01 of the charter, but it does not change all of the references to the old twoyear terms (Section 2.41 (2-3. Thus, it is necessary for the Guilford County Board of Elections to proceed with its next required election, however the Court determines that election to be structured, which must be conducted without further modification by August 7, 2015. Simply stated, the next election can be conducted in a manner as described under the current statute or in 11

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 12 of 14 some modified version for the next election, so long as all the necessary components for conducting the election are established by that date. IV. CONCLUSION The Plaintiffs, in their Complaint, challenges the Constitutionality a bill adopted by the General Assembly; however, the defendant Guilford County Board of Elections has no authority over drawing of districts, the manner of election of Greensboro council members or their terms or any other governance issues involving Greensboro council members. Defendant Guilford County Board of Elections merely conducts the elections within the mandates established by statute and, where challenged, to the extent upheld by judicial review. The Guilford County Board of Elections is charged by statute with acting in a fair, impartial, and lawful manner both in appearance and in fact. Guilford County Board of Elections has acted and will continue to act within the scope and authority granted to it under North Carolina law, including any mandates issued by this Court. Additionally, the Guilford County Board of Elections is available to provide additional information for the Court s review and consideration as the Court provides guidance through this process. This the 20th day of July, 2015. /s/j. Mark Payne J. Mark Payne (N.C.S.B. No. 11046 Attorney for Guilford County Board of Elections mpayne@co.guilford.nc.us 12

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 13 of 14 OFFICE OF GUILFORD COUNTY ATTORNEY 301 W. Market Street PO Box 3427 (27402 Greensboro, N.C. 27401 Phone: (336 641-3852 Fax: (336 641-3642 13

Case 1:15-cv-00559-CCE-JLW Document 27 Filed 07/20/15 Page 14 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 20 day of July, 2015, a copy of the foregoing Defendant's Brief In Opposition To Plaintiffs' Complaint, Motion For Temporary Restraining Order, Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Requests For Temporary And Permanent Injunctive Relief was served upon all parties in accordance with the provisions of Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by: Hand delivering a copy hereof to the attorney for each said party addressed as follows: X Depositing a copy hereof, postage prepaid, in the United States Mail, addressed as follows: Teleco pying a copy thereof to the attorney for each said party and to each party as follows: Sending a copy thereof to the attorney for each said party and to each party by electronic mail ( e-mail as follows: Jim W. Phillips, Jr. Julia C. Ambrose Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP Humphrey & Leonard, LLP Post Office Box 26000 Post Office Box 26000 Greensboro, NC 27420 Greensboro, NC 27420 jphillips@brookspierce.com jambrose@brookspierce.com Attorney for Plaintiff City of Attorney for Plaintiff City of Daniel F.E. Smith Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP Post Office Box 26000 Greensboro, NC 27420 dsmith@brookspierce.com Attorney for Plaintiff City of Greensboro Greensboro Greensboro Anita S. Earls Allison J. Riggs Southern Coalition for Social Justice 1415 W. Hwy 54, Ste 101 Durham, NC 27707 anita@southerncoalition.org Allison@southerncoalition.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lewis A. Brandon, III, Joyce Johnson, Nelson Johnson, Richard Alan Koritz, Sandra Self Koritz, and Charli Mae Sykes X Use of the Court s CM/ECF electronic filing system which will send notification of such filing to the Plaintiffs counsel of record. This the 20 day of July, 2015. /s/ J. Mark Payne J. Mark Payne 14