UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 460 Filed: 09/25/15 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15864

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.3

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

~/

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-CV DT DISTRICT JUDGE PAUL D.

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON CHAPTER I: HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PRETRIAL ORDERS

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

Third, it should provide for the orderly admission of evidence.

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case4:07-cv PJH Document1171 Filed05/29/12 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RULES OF PROCEDURE. For Applications & Appeals

Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case 3:02-cv AVC Document 188 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 IN RE: AMERANTH CASES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv00 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER REGULATING DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS On February 0,, the Court held a telephonic status conference with counsel for the parties in these consolidated cases. After consulting with counsel and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: - - cv0

Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0. Although Plaintiff s claims for infringement of the 0, and Patents are no longer at issue in light of findings by the PTAB and the Federal Circuit that those Patents are invalid, the Court declines to enter judgment on those claims at this time pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (b). Instead, the Court will enter one final judgment after the claims concerning the 0 Patent are finally adjudicated.. Pursuant to Plaintiff s representation during the status conference, Plaintiff is no longer pursuing any claims of willful infringement against any of the Defendants, including Ticketbiscuit, Fandango, Usablenet and Dominos. Accordingly, those claims are no longer at issue.. Defendants shall withdraw any and all pending motions to dismiss and file Answers to their respective operative Complaints on or before February,. To the extent any Defendants desire to file motions based on failure to state a claim for direct or indirect infringement, they may raise those issues in a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (c) within seven () calendar days after the service of Plaintiff s amended infringement contentions.. The Magistrate Judge shall schedule ENE conferences for all parties to take place as soon as possible after the Answers are filed.. Plaintiff shall file its motion to disqualify counsel on or before February,. Any opposition to Plaintiff s motion to disqualify shall be filed on or before March 0,. Any reply briefs shall be filed on or before March,. The motion shall be heard on April,, at :0 p.m.. Plaintiff shall provide amended infringement contentions as to all Defendants on or before March,. Plaintiff is directed to select no more than five () claims from the 0 Patent to assert against each Defendant. Plaintiff's amended infringement contentions shall consist of one representative version of each Defendant s accused system for the selected claims of the 0 Patent asserted against that Defendant. If Plaintiff asserts indirect infringement (contributory or inducement) by a Defendant, Plaintiff shall provide as part of its infringement contentions an example of how the - - cv0

Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 Defendant indirectly infringes, including the identity of the direct infringer and factual basis for the Defendant's intent.. No later than April,, Defendants shall provide Plaintiff with the source codes for their respective representative system identified in Plaintiff s amended infringement contentions.. No later than May,, Defendants shall serve invalidity contentions pursuant to Patent L.R.. and produce documents as required by Patent L.R... Defendants shall jointly provide a list of prior art they contend individually or in combination invalidates the patent at issue. Defendants shall jointly serve one set of initial invalidity contentions on Plaintiff in accordance with the format set forth in the local rules. The contentions shall be directed at the claims Plaintiff selects for its infringement contentions. Defendants' production of information pursuant to Local Rule.(a), setting forth the technical specifications and other information for their accused system is limited to the system identified in Plaintiff's initial infringement contentions. Defendants' contentions shall include all, if any, prior art they contend invalidates a claim based on anticipation. Defendants shall include no more than five separate prior art combinations they contend invalidate based on obviousness. For the latter purpose, Defendants may assert additional prior art references or combinations at this time only with leave of Court.. Counsel for all parties shall meet and confer and select no more than ten (0) claim terms or phrases from the 0 Patent for construction. 0. On or before June,, the parties shall exchange preliminary claim constructions pursuant to Patent L.R..(a) and identify extrinsic evidence as required by Patent L.R..(b). On or before June,, the parties shall exchange responsive claim constructions pursuant to Patent L.R..(c) and identify extrinsic evidence as required by Patent L.R..(d). In the interests of efficiency and reducing the cost of litigation, Defendants are encouraged to provide an omnibus preliminary claim construction and an omnibus response to Plaintiff. - - cv0

Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0. On or before July,, the parties shall complete and file a joint claim construction chart, joint claim construction worksheet, and joint hearing statement pursuant to Patent L.R.... All discovery intended for use in the claim construction hearing must be completed no later than August,. See Patent L.R.... Defendants shall file one omnibus claim construction brief and response. To the extent any Defendant wishes to present an argument specific to its position, it may do so in a supplemental brief or response not to exceed five () pages. No later than September,, the parties shall simultaneously file their opening claim construction briefs. See Patent L.R..(a). No later than October,, the parties shall simultaneously file their responsive claim construction briefs. See Patent L.R..(b).. On October,, at :0 p.m. the Court will hold a joint telephonic conference to discuss the parties intended presentations at the claim construction hearing, including any tutorial and testimony.. The claim construction hearing will be held on November,, at :00 a.m. See Patent L.R... The Court shall hold a joint case management conference at the end of the claim construction hearing. Counsel shall be prepared to discuss trial dates and case management dates leading up to trial for all cases except the IPDEV case.. As to the IPDEV case only, the following additional schedule shall apply: a. All fact discovery shall be completed on or before August,. All expert discovery shall be completed on or before November,. "Completed" means that all discovery under Rules 0- of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule, must be initiated a sufficient period of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking into account the times for service, notice, and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and any motions and the resolution of any discovery disputes. All disputes concerning discovery shall be brought to the attention of the Magistrate Judge - -

Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 no later than thirty (0) days following the date upon which the event giving rise to the discovery dispute occurred. Counsel shall meet and confer pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. and Local Rule.(a). b. On or before June,, all parties shall exchange with all other parties a list of all expert witnesses expected to be called at trial. The list shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the expert and a brief statement identifying the subject areas as to which the expert is expected to testify. The list shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony. On or before July,, any party may supplement its designation in response to any other party's designation so long as that party has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. c. Each expert witness designated by a party shall prepare a written report to be provided to all other parties no later than August,, containing the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. (a)()(a) and (B). Except as provided in paragraph below, any party that fails to make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P.. d. Any party, through any expert designated, shall in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. (a)()(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P. (e)(), supplement any of its expert reports regarding evidence intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter identified in an expert report submitted by another party. Any such supplemental reports are due on or before September,. e. The Court will set a filing deadline for dispositive motions in its claim construction order. f. Counsel shall serve on each other and file with the Clerk of the Court their Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law in compliance with Local Rule.(f)() (and.(f)(), where applicable) on or before February,. - -

Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 g. Counsel shall confer and take the action required by Local Rule.(f)() on or before February,. At this meeting, counsel shall discuss and attempt to enter into stipulations and agreements resulting in simplification of the triable issues. Counsel shall exchange copies and/or display all exhibits other than those to be used for impeachment, lists of witnesses and their addresses including experts who will be called to testify, and written contentions of applicable facts and law. The exhibits shall be prepared in accordance with Local Rule.(f)()(c). Counsel shall cooperate in the preparation of the proposed final pretrial conference order. h. The proposed final pretrial conference order, including written objections, if any, to any party's Fed. R. Civ. P. (a)() pretrial disclosures, shall be served on opposing counsel and lodged directly with chambers on or before March,, and shall be in the form prescribed in and in compliance with Local Rule.(f)(). In addition, the parties shall include in the proposed pretrial order a statement to be read to the jury, not in excess of one page, of the nature of the case and the claims and defenses. Any objections to pretrial disclosures shall comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. (a)(). Please be advised that the failure to file written objections to a party's pretrial disclosures may result in the waiver of such objections, with the exception of those made pursuant to Rules 0 (relevance) and 0 (prejudice, confusion or waste of time) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. i. The parties shall file and serve their motions in limine on or before April,. Each side shall be limited to five () motions, and each motion shall be no more than five () pages. The parties are admonished, however, to meet and confer to try and resolve their disputes before filing motions in limine. Oppositions to motions in limine shall be filed on or before April,. A hearing on the parties motions in limine shall be held on April,, at :0 p.m. j. The final pretrial conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable Dana M. Sabraw on March,, at 0:0 a.m. The trial is scheduled to commence on April,, at :00 a.m. - -

Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 k. The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February, HON. DANA M. SABRAW United States District Judge - -