Similar documents
Appendix I UDRP. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. (As Approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999)

Primary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP:

a) to take account of the policy rules that apply to.au domain names, that do not apply to gtld domain names; and

dotcoop will cancel, transfer, or otherwise make changes to domain name registrations as rendered by a WIPO ruling.

DOMAIN NAMES REGISTRANT AGREEMENT

PROPOSED.AU DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) AND RULES. auda Dispute Resolution Working Group. May 2001

UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 11 JANUARY 2012

Dominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012

.VERSICHERUNG. Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names

Act on Protection of the Names of Specific Agricultural, Forestry and

dotberlin GmbH & Co. KG

[.onl] Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

Utility Model Act ( Act No. 123 of 1959)

Act on the Promotion of Technology Transfer from Universities to Private Business Operators (Act No. 52 of May 6, 1998)

Civil Execution Act ( Act No. 4 of 1979)

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy VERSION 1.0

.XN--MGBCA7DZDO SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

GoRemit Shinsei Overseas Remittance Service Manual for Online Remittance Service

1. Requirements. PPH using the national work products from the IMPI

the domain name is not identical to the mark on which the registrant based its Sunrise registration; (2)

Act on Securing, Etc. of Equal Opportunity and Treatment between Men and Women in Employment (Act No. 113 of July 1, 1972)

American Bible Society DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy

Law No. (9) For the year 2002 With regards of Trademarks, Trade Data, Trade names, Geographic indications and the Industrial design and templates

Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure

1. Requirements. PPH using the national work products from NOIP

Rules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (2012)

CLI 社 HaCat(Human Skin keratinocyte:#300493) 使用目的確認書

Dear ICANN, Best regards, ADR.EU, Czech Arbitration Court

Sunrise and DPML Dispute Resolution Policy

Dispute Resolution Service Policy

ARBITRATION AWARD. .IN REGISTRY - NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA.IN domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy INDRP Rules of Procedure

REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 REVISED - NOVEMBER 2010

Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( the Rules )

Act on Authorization of Public Interest Incorporated Associations and Public Interest Incorporated Foundations (Act No.

106TH CONGRESS Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMMUNICATIONS OMNIBUS REFORM ACT OF 1999

Top Level Design LLC January 22, 2015

In the matter of the Domain <Noam-kuris.co.il>

1. Requirements. PPH using the national work products from the MyIPO

特定電子メールの送信の適正化等に関する法律 ( 仮訳 )

. 淡马锡 REGISTRATION POLICIES

2009 年の船舶の安全かつ環境上適正な再生利用のための香港国際条約 ( 仮称 ) 和英対比表 ( 仮訳 ) 1 本文 ( 平成 21 年 5 月 15 日版 )

GUIDELINES IN DISQUALIFICATION OF A FIRM OR INDIVIDUAL FROM COMPETING FOR A CONTRACT (DEBARMENT GUIDELINES)

Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures for the Promotion of New Energy Use, etc. ( Cabinet Order No. 208 of June 20, 1997)

Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act ( Act No. 228 of December 1, 1949)

.BOSTIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Offenders Rehabilitation Services Act (Act No. 86 of 1995)

.HEALTH STARTUP PLAN Version 1.0

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.

2006R0510 EN This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its conte

The seminar will focus on human lifestyles and its impacts on the environment. 授業目的 /Course Objectives

Part I PPH using the national work products from the SIPO

SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

1. Requirements. PPH using the national work products from the TIPO

.BOOKING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

.NIKE DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

.FARMERS DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Attachment to Module 3

The Uniform Rapid Suspension Policy and Rules Summary


Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.

.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

THE INSTITUTE OF ARBITRATORS & MEDIATORS AUSTRALIA ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION MATTER NO. 3167

.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution for Domain Names ( ERDRP )

JAPAN PATENT OFFICE AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS

ANNEX 1: Registry Reserved Names. Capitalized terms have the meaning as specified in Article 1 of the.vistaprint Domain Name Registration Policies.

Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policies

Background on ICANN s Role Concerning the UDRP & Courts. Tim Cole Chief Registrar Liaison ICANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 19 SEPTEMBER 2011

研究報告 A Study on Legislative and Administrative Factors behind Informal Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Mining (ASGM) in Tanzania

"We", "us" and "our" refers to Register Matrix, trading as registermatrix.com.

Dispute Resolution for Domain Names

etendering International standards project

Attachment 3..Brand TLD Designation Application

RULES FOR NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM S SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

Period for Exception to Lack of Novelty for Designs Extended to One Year

WOMEN WRITERS PROJECT LICENSE FORM FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

REGISTRANT AGREEMENT Version 1.5

Complaint Resolution Service (CRS)

Challenge!! Open Governance 2016 Application Form for Citizens/Students

Regulations for the Implementation of Trademark Law

日本語総合コース入学願書 Japanese Comprehensive Course Application for Admission to ECC Japanese Language Institute

The FORUM s Supplemental Rules to ICANN s Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy (TDRP)

Current Situations of Bangladeshi Immigrants in Japan: A Case of the Munshiganj Community

MHM Asian Legal Insights

I BASIC PROVISIONS. Subject of the Rules of Procedure

付属資料 I : 投資 ビジネス関連法令リスト

テクニカルインフォメーション 香港における停泊中の燃料規制について TEC 年 6 月 24 日. No. 発行日

A guideline to receive a student status of residence

Dispute Resolution Service Procedure

更生保護法 ( 平成十九年六月十五日法律第八十八号 ) Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of June 15, 2007)

Food Sanitation Act (Act No. 233 of February 24, 1947)

Mining Act (Act No. 289 of 1950)

THE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES (IN EFFECT AS OF 31 JULY 2015)

The U.S. Occupation of Japan

Transcription:

Page 1 of 6 TOP ENGLISH SITEMAP RSS サイト内検索 : 検索 JPNIC はインターネットの円滑な運営を支えるための組織です トップページ > JPNIC ライブラリ > ドキュメントライブラリ J P N I C とは インターネットガバナンス インターネットの技術 ドメイン名 インターネットの歴史 統計 I P アドレス インターネットの基礎 J P N I C 認証局 JPNIC ライブラリ トピックス ドキュメントライブラリイベント 講演会資料ニュースレターメールマガジン執筆記事調査報告書会議資料 JPNICからの提言 This is an unofficial translation provided as reference material to aid in the understanding of this rule. Only the original Japanese texts of the rule have legal effect. http://www.nic.ad.jp/ja/doc/validity.html Publication: July 19, 2000 Revision: October 10, 2000 Revision: February 19, 2002 Revision: March 9, 2007 Implementation: June 1, 2007 JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Art. 1 Purpose This "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy" (hereinafter referred to as "the Policy") has been adopted by Japan Network Information Center (hereinafter referred to as "JPNIC") and is incorporated by reference into the "Registration Rules for Organizational Type and Geographic Type JP Domain Names" and "Registration Rules for General-use JP Domain Names"(hereinafter referred to as "the Registration Rules"), which shall be abided by registrants who have registered their domain names at Japan Registry Service Co., Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as "JPRS") (hereinafter referred to those registrants as "the Registrant"). The Policy has determined the conditions in connection with a dispute between the Registrant and any third party over the domain name arising from the registration and the use of domain name registered by the Registrant. Proceedings on JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution under Art. 4 of the Policy shall be conducted according to the "Rules for Procedure of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy" (hereinafter referred to as "Rules for Procedure") and the supplemental rules of the selected dispute-resolution service provider that is approved by JPNIC (hereinafter referred to as "the dispute-resolution service provider"). Art. 2 Notice of the Registrant and Violation of Duty of Notice By applying to register a domain name, or by asking JPRS to maintain or renew a domain name registration, the Registrant shall notify JPRS of that: a. the contents of statements made in the Registration Application are complete and accurate

Page 2 of 6 b. to the best knowledge of the Registrant, the registration of the domain name will not infringe upon or otherwise violate the rights or interests of any third party c. the Registrant is not registering the domain name for in bad faith (unfair purposes, that is, purposes of gaining unfair interests, of causing damages to others and other unfair purposes. The same shall apply in the followings.) d. the Registrant will not knowingly use the domain name in violation of any applicable laws or regulations In the event that any of the above is not correct, the Registrant agrees that the domain name may be transferred or cancelled pursuant to the Policy. Art. 3 Transfers and Cancellations of Domain Name JPRS will transfer or cancel the domain name registration under the following circumstances: a. Subject to the provisions of Art. 8, the receipt by JPRS of written instructions from the Registrant or its authorized agent to take such action; b. The receipt by JPRS of the original (a copy of the original may be acceptable if circumstances require) of an order from a court or arbitration tribunal, in each case of competent jurisdiction, requiring such action; and/or c. The receipt by JPRS of a decision of an Administrative Panel requiring such action in JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings to which the Registrant was a party and which was conducted under this Policy or a later version of this Policy adopted by JPNIC (See Art. 4 (i) and (k) of the Policy below.) JPRS may also cancel or transfer the domain name registration in accordance with the terms of the Registration Rules or other legal requirements. If the transfer has been made, however, the JPRS will not establish the name server for the domain name unless the qualifications and requirements for registration are satisfied. Art. 4 JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding This Article sets forth the type of disputes for which the Registrant is required to submit to JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings. These proceedings will be conducted before one of the administrative-dispute-resolution service providers listed on the web site of JPNIC. a. Applicable Dispute The Registrant is required to submit to this JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding in the event that a third party (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant") asserts to the applicable dispute-resolution service provider, in compliance with the Rules of Procedure, that i. the domain name of the Registrant is identical or confusingly similar to any mark such as trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights or legitimate interests; and ii. the Registrant has no relevant rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and iii. the domain name of the Registrant has been registered or is being used in bad faith (unfair purpose).

Page 3 of 6 In the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding, the Complainant must prove each of these three elements. b. Proof of Registration or Use in In Bad Faith (Unfair Purpose) To determine whether or not there are factual elements provided by this Article (a)(iii), the panel of the dispute-resolution service provider must consider that the registration or use of a domain name is for in bad faith (unfair purpose) if the Panel found especially the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation. i. circumstances indicating that the Registrant has registered or has acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name to the Complainant or to a competitor of that Complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of the out-of-pocket costs (amount to be confirmed by documentation) directly related to the domain name; or ii. the Registrant has registered the domain name in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting any trademarks or other indication in a corresponding domain name, provided that the Registrant has engaged in a plural numbers of such interference; or iii. the Registrant has registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor; or iv. by using the domain name, the Registrant has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to the web site or other on-line location of the Registrant, by intending to make a confusion as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the web site or location or of a product or service thereon. c. How to Demonstrate the Relevant Rights to and Legitimate Interests in the Domain Name When the Registrant receives a complaint, the Registrant should refer to Art. 5 of the Rules of Procedure and submit the response to the dispute-resolution service provider. In order to determine whether or not the factual situation provided by this Article a (ii), if the panel reviewed all evidence presented either by the Complainant or the Registrant and especially found the following circumstance, in particular but without limitation, the Panel must consider that the Registrant holds the relevant rights or legitimate interests to the domain name: i. before the Registrant receives any notice of the dispute related to the subject domain name by any third party or the dispute-resolution service provider, the Registrant uses of, or apparently demonstrate preparations to use of, the domain name or a name corresponding thereto, in order to offer of goods or services for a valid purpose; or ii. the Registrant has been commonly known by any name under the domain name, regardless of registration or others by the Registrant of any trademark and other indications. iii. The Registrant is using the domain name for a noncommercial purpose or is making fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers by utilizing the trademark and other indications of the Complainant or to tarnish any trademark and other indications of the Complainant. d. Selection of dispute-resolution service provider

Page 4 of 6 The Complainant shall select the dispute-resolution service provider from among those approved by JPNIC by submitting the complaint to that dispute-resolution service provider. The selected dispute-resolution service provider shall administer and conduct the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding, except in cases of consolidation as described in this Article (f). e. Initiation of Proceeding and Process and Appointment of Panel. The Rules of Procedure state the process for initiating and conducting a proceeding and for appointing the panel that will decide the dispute. f. Consolidation In the event of multiple disputes between the same Registrant and the Complainant, either the Registrant or the Complainant may petition to consolidate the disputes before a single panel. This petition shall be made to the first panel appointed to hear a pending dispute between the parties. This panel may consolidate before it any or all such disputes at its sole discretion, provided that the consolidated disputes are governed by this Policy or later versions of this Policy adopted by JPNIC. g. Fees All fees charged by a dispute-resolution service provider in connection with any dispute case before a panel pursuant to this Policy shall be paid by the Complainant, except in cases where the Registrant elects to expand the number of panelist from one to three as provided in Art. 5 of the Rules of Procedure, in which case all the fees will be shared evenly between the parties. h. The Involvement of JPNIC and JPRS in the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings JPNIC and JPRS do not, and will not participate in the administration or conduct of any proceeding before a panel. In addition, JPNIC and JPRS will not be liable for decisions itself rendered by the panel. i. Remedies The remedies available to the Complainant pursuant to any proceeding before a panel shall be limited to requiring the cancellation of the domain name of the Registrant or the transfer of the domain name registration to the Complainant. j. Notification and Publication The dispute-resolution service provider shall notify JPNIC and JPRS of any decision made by a panel with respect to the domain name. JPNIC shall reposit and publish all decisions over the Internet, provided, however, that JPNIC may not publish certain portions of its decision when JPNIC determines it necessary. The dispute-resolution service provider shall agree on JPNIC's reposition and the publication of the decisions. k. Availability of Court Proceedings Either of the parties may submit the dispute to a court before the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolutions Proceeding is commenced, whilst such proceeding is pending or after such proceeding is concluded. Any

Page 5 of 6 requirement set forth in this Article shall not prevent the parties from submitting the dispute to a court under this clause. If the panel decides that the domain name registration of the Registrant should be canceled or transferred, JPRS will wait ten (10) business days (as observed in the location of the head office of JPRS) after JPRS is informed by the applicable dispute-resolution service provider of the Panel's decision before implementing that decision. JPRS will then implement the decision unless JPRS has received from the Registrant during the ten (10) business day period officially certified copy of document(such as a copy of a complaint, file-stamped by the clerk of the court) that the Registrant has commenced a lawsuit against the Complainant in a jurisdiction to which the Complainant has submitted under Art. 3 (b) (xii) of the Rules of Procedure. (In general, that jurisdiction is either the Tokyo District Court or the location of the address of the Registrant as shown in the domain name's registration data in JPRS. See Art. 1 and Art. 3 (b) (xii) of the Rules of Procedure.) If JPRS receives such officially certified copy of the document within the ten (10) business day period, JPRS will not implement the panel's decision. JPRS will take no further action concerning the implementation of the Panel's decision until JPRS receives (i)the certified copy of settlement agreement between the parties made in notarized documentation, (ii) the officially certified copy of the petition for withdrawing the action brought by the Registrant and of consent for the withdraw by the Complainant, or (iii) the officially certified copy of a final judgment or the documentation equivalent to it of such court dismissing the lawsuit or ordering that the Registrant does not have the right to continue to use the domain name. Any copy may be submitted instead of the officially certified copy of the document mentioned above. Art. 5 All Other Disputes and Litigation All other disputes between the Registrant and the Complainant regarding the domain name registration, which are not brought pursuant to Art. 4 of the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding, shall be resolved between the parties through any court, arbitration or other proceeding that may be available. Art. 6 The Involvement of JPNIC and JPRS in Disputes Both JPNIC and JPRS will not participate in any way in any dispute between the Registrant and any third party regarding the registration and use of the domain name. The Registrant shall not name JPNIC and/or JPRS as a party/parties or otherwise include JPNIC and/or JPRS in any such proceeding. In the event that JPNIC and/or JPRS are/is named as a party/parties in any such proceeding, JPNIC and/or JPRS reserve(s) the right to raise any and all defenses deemed appropriate, and to take any other action necessary to defend itself/themselves. Art. 7 Maintaining the Status Quo JPRS will not transfer, cancel or otherwise change the status of any domain name registration under this Policy except as provided in Art. 3 of this Policy and in the Registration Rules. Art. 8 Transfers of Domain Name During a Dispute The Registrant may not transfer the domain name registration to another holder under each of the following conditions. i. during a pending JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding pursuant to Art. 4 or for a period of fifteen (15) business days

Page 6 of 6 (as observed in the location of the head office of JPRS) after such proceeding is concluded; or ii. during a pending court proceeding or arbitration unless the party to whom the domain name registration is being transferred agrees, in writing, to be bound by the decision of the court or arbitrator. JPRS reserves the right to delete any registration of a domain name transferred to another holder or to disapprove of any application for transfer of registration which are made in violation of this Article. Art. 9 Policy Modifications JPNIC reserves the right to modify this Policy at any time. JPNIC and JPRS will post the revised Policy on each website at least thirty (30) calendar days before it becomes effective. When the Proceeding was initiated by the submission of a complaint to the dispute-resolution service provider, the Policy in effect at the time it was invoked will continue to be applied to the proceeding until it is concluded. In the event that the proceeding was not initiated under this Policy, all the changes shall be applied to all JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding, whether the dispute arose before, on or after the effective date of the change. In the event that the Registrant objects to a change in this Policy, the sole remedy for the Registrant is to cancel the domain name registration with JPRS, provided that the Registrant will not be entitled to a refund of any fees paid to JPRS. The revised Policy will apply to the Registrant until the Registrant completes the cancellation of domain name registration. Art. 10 Applicable Law in this Policy All the provisions in this Policy shall be construed in accordance with the laws of Japan. The panel that will conduct dispute resolution under this Policy shall render decisions pursuant to the laws of Japan. ページトップへ お問い合わせ先著作権 / リンク JPNIC 個人情報保護方針 Q&A Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Japan Network Information Center. All Rights Reserved.