GOOD PRACTICE DESCRIPTION

Similar documents
Terms of Reference YOUTH SEMINAR: HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES OF FORCED MIGRATIONS. Italy, 2nd -6th May 2012

De facto refugees Family reunification 13,000 14,000 Unaccompanied minors Reception centres 75 66

Country Reports Nordic Region. A brief overview about the Nordic countries on population, the proportion of foreign-born and asylum seekers

Recognizing that priorities for responding to protracted refugee situations are different from those for responding to emergency situations,

2. What are inclusive practices (on national level) in your country with these groups?

IV CONCLUSIONS. Concerning general aspects:

Goals and Achievements. The Separated Children in Europe Programme

Recommendation CP(2013)10 on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Spain

With the financial support of the

BPE: Becoming a part of Europe How youth work can support young migrants, refugees and asylum seekers code EPP IT-EPPKA3-IPI-SOC-IN

StepIn! Building Inclusive Societies through Active Citizenship. National Needs Analysis OVERALL NEEDS ANALYSIS REPORT

European Voluntary Service

A New Beginning Refugee Integration in Europe

WHO S RESPONSIBLE? A TOOL TO STRENGTHEN COOPERATION BETWEEN ACTORS INVOLVED IN THE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR UNACCOMPANIED MIGRANT CHILDREN

Migrant children, their and our future - high-quality education as the best practice for both refugees and the society

COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POSITIONS ON THE RIGHTS OF MINOR MIGRANTS IN AN IRREGULAR SITUATION

Unaccompanied minors in Sweden: Policy trajectories and contemporary issues. Daniel Hedlund Dept of Child and Youth Studies

ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF CROATIA SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW-UP

HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES OF THE SWEDISH TEMPORARY ALIENS ACT HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES OF THE SWEDISH TEMPOR ARY ALIENS ACT

Somalis in Copenhagen

INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION 122 nd Assembly and related meetings Bangkok (Thailand), 27 th March - 1 st April 2010

CONTRIBUTION TO THE THIRTEENTH COORDINATION MEETING ON INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION 1. Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur

Committee on the Rights of the Child. The Rights of All Children in the Context of International Migration OUTLINE FOR PARTICIPANTS

Integrated Action Plan for Integration of Refugees Municipality of Thessaloniki May 2018

Withyou. Annual Report 2011: Our Past Year s Achievements. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Bangkok Office newsletter, 2012 Volume 4

NATIONAL ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING 2015 statistical overview

Integrating young refugees in Europe: Tandem a case study By Mark Perera

EUROCITIES LABOUR MARKET INTEGRATION OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS. December 2017

Policies, Practices and Prospects: The Unaccompanied Minors in Sweden

Improving the situation of older migrants in the European Union

Bosnia and Herzegovina

IOM seminar , House of Estates

Young refugees finding their voice: participation between discourse and practice (draft version)

ENSURING PROTECTION FOR ALL PERSONS OF CONCERN TO UNHCR, with priority given to:

National Society: Implementation Plan Florence Call for Action

CITY MIGRATION PROFILE METROPOLITAN CITY OF TURIN

COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN OVERVIEW

Supporting Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children (UASC)

Current migration situation in the EU: Education

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

Current knowledge about Nordic welfare issues

European Integration Forum Summary report of the first meeting April 2009

Elisabeth Dahlin, Secretary General, Save the Children, Sweden

ESOL Coordinator 28,000

StepIn! Building Inclusive Societies through Active Citizenship. National Needs Analysis SWEDEN. Adult Education Providers

Anna Ludwinek Eurofound (Dublin)

Refugee Inclusion Strategy. Action Plan

Common Grounds. Communitarian experiences to learn and spread intercultural competences. InfoPack. Description and objectives:

Widening Access to Refugees and Asylum Seekers

February July 2014 (6 months) renewable

ERB 2030 Agenda Euroregion Baltic

Emerging Challenges in Response to the Refugee Crisis The state of the Macedonian asylum system

UAM in Sweden. EMN-conference Dublin 2018

Identification of victims of trafficking in human beings in international protection and forced return procedures in Sweden

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 May /10 MIGR 43 SOC 311

Disaggregating SDG indicators by migratory status. Haoyi Chen United Nations Statistics Division

NEWSLETTER SPRING 2018

National Society: Implementation Plan Florence Call for Action

JUSTICE Strategic Plan

Russian Federation. Operational highlights. Persons of concern

Save the Children s position on the Asylum and Migration Fund

Turkey. Operational highlights. Working environment

PERCO Platform for European Red Cross Cooperation on Refugees, Asylum-seekers and Migrants

UNHCR Accountability Framework for Age, Gender and Diversity Mainstreaming

Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings CP(2017)20. Received 7 September 2017

ANALYSIS: FLOW MONITORING SURVEYS CHILD - SPECIFIC MODULE APRIL 2018

Western Europe. Working environment

COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD. Fortieth session CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION

Protection and Assistance for Migrant Women in Honduras

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

Addressing Human Trafficking, Kidnapping and Smuggling of Persons in Sudan MID-YEAR REPORT JANUARY-JUNE 2017

Summary. Background, objectives and study design. Background

Rapporteur: Luis Miguel PARIZA CASTAÑOS

Challenges in the work of young homelessness asylum seekers in Sweden. The background can be found in the refugee situation

Comments of the European Network against Racism (ENAR) European Commission Green Paper on the Future of the Common European Asylum System.

EC/68/SC/CRP.19. Community-based protection and accountability to affected populations. Executive Committee of the High Commissioner s Programme

Projects funded under National Funding to Promote the Integration of Immigrants

Community-Based Protection Survey Findings and Analysis

Statistical information on Trafficking in Human Beings, provided by the Swedish National Rapporteur, October 2013.

Labour market integration of refugees in Sweden

Submission by Save the Children Sweden related to the Human Rights Council Universal Periodical Review of Sweden 2010

Case Study. Institutional strengthening against gender-based political violence in Bolivia. SDGs ADDRESSED CHAPTERS. More info:

Meanwhile, some 10,250 of the most vulnerable recognized refugees were submitted for resettlement.


THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA OFFICE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RIGHTS OF NATIONAL MINORITIES

TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL LITHUANIAN CHAPTER STRATEGY

Action for the Rights of Children. A Training and Capacity-Building Initiative On Behalf of Refugee Children and Adolescents

Guidance for NGOs to report to GRETA La Strada International and Anti Slavery International

Council of Europe Strategy for the Rights of the Child ( )

SUMMARY REPORT

3. Political and legal developments concerning migration issues

Unaccompanied minors in Denmark - definition by authorities

StepIn! Building Inclusive Societies through Active Citizenship LLP DE-GRUNDTVIG-GMP / Module 4

Workshop Title: Migration Management: Sharing Experiences between Europe and Thailand. Banyan Tree Hotel, Bangkok (13-14 June 2012)

The Swedish Foundation in Support of Human Rights Watch HRW Sweden Impact Report (Effektrapport) December 2016

The Stockholm Conclusions

2017 NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS AND PROTECTION OF VICTIMS

Refugee and Migrant Children in Europe

An EU Strategy towards the eradication of trafficking in Human beings

Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Sweden*

Transcription:

BpE: Becoming a part of Europe project How youth work can support young migrants, refugees and asylum seekers Code 580420- EPP-1-2016-1-IT-EPPKA3-IPI-SOC-IN GOOD PRACTICE DESCRIPTION Project title Project duration Project team: how many persons took part in the implementation of the project? Project coordinator details: name and surname, email Please shortly describe your organisation. Are you involved in similar projects? How many years have you developed your activities in the youth work field? Has the project been cofunded with European funds? PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Skåne Stadsmission May 2016 ongoing Four persons. One project manager, one lawyer and two field workers. All full-time except one field worker on part-time (50%). Klas Herrmansson, klas.herrmansson@skanestadsmission.se YOUR ORGANISATION Skåne Stadsmission is a non-profit organisation working for people living in vulnerability and exclusion in the region of south Sweden, Skåne. The organisation is part of the collaboration Young Forum where lawyers and social workers work together to provide support to children, families, young people and young adults. Our project is a partner to the relatively new project "No children will disappear" managed by the NGO Save the Children in Sweden. We also collaborate with the projects Baba and Habibi in Stockholm. We are also represented regionally in the Swedish County Administrative Board's cooperation group working with and named "Unaccompanied children disappearing". Young Forum has been actively working towards the target group unaccompanied children and youths who are outside the asylum process for one year but was started in April 2014. RESOURCES AND FUNDS No.

If yes, which programme did co-fund your project? If not, which organisation, donor, institution did support your project? Did you involve other partners in the implementation of the project? If yes, which ones? What was their role? If not, why? Are there any relationship between the project and the School system? In which context, have you realised the project? What were the initial needs for this kind of project? What were the interests and needs of the promoting institution and its partners? Please, specify the aims and objectives of the project PARTNERS Swedish fund Arvsfonden. - We cooperate with the Association for Unaccompanied Youth who run a social meeting place called Otto. The project conducts legal advice once a week. We also join in a regional cooperation network with, among others, the Swedish County Administrative Board, Save the Children, the police department, the Swedish Migration Agency, Public trustee office, the City of Malmö and Trelleborg Municipality. We collaborate with the School of Social Work in Lund regarding the evaluation of the project. We have also, with the support from a volunteer, begun providing our own education, as many in the target group have been considered being older than they are and thus are not entitled to schooling. CONTEXT There is an extensive demand for projects similar to ours, the target group increases as there were many unaccompanied youths who came in 2015-2016. As the majority of our target group are considered aged 18 or older (e.g. adults), many rights (as they has as youths) disappear the day this becomes official. The target group grows to be more and more extensive every week, and we are contacted by young people, legal guardians and adults from all parts in Sweden. Skåne Stadsmission works perceptive and proactively with people in vulnerable situations, acute and long-term. We strive to defend diversity, make the injustice in society visible and engage individuals and organizations to act for change. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The main objective of the project is to legalize the target group's stay in Sweden. The project wants to guarantee support and include a group that is forced

to live as excluded from society. By offering legal advice/representation, open operation and workshops, we want to reduce the proportion of children and young people living in vulnerability and reduce the number of unaccompanied who disappears. What type of learning was fostered in the project, if any? Please shortly describe the main activities Which were the results you did achieve thanks to the implementation of the project? Which results you did not achieve and why? Did those results have an impact in the context in which the project was realised? If yes, how? If not, why? How far the community was involved? What was its contribution? Since the project and its field work are unique in Sweden, the most of what we do is based on "learning by doing". We develop and learn from our mistakes and work with a solution-focused approach where we focus on what works. MAIN ACTIVITIES Field work towards young people who risks living or already lives outside the asylum process Legal advice and dialogue towards this group Supportive work in applying for financial assistance and social services ACHIEVED RESULTS Through our lawyer, a number of enforcements of residence refusals have been hindered, which means that some out of the target groups have been given the opportunity to retrieve their refusal. Thus, their stay has been temporarily legalized. The project has contributed with knowledge as we are one of the few players who have access and talk with the target group Yes, we have been flexible in our work and always strive to develop the project. Our reference group's voices and stories are included in the National Commitment to Unaccompanied Children who Disappear and the Children's Ombudsman s forthcoming report on the subject. The City of Malmö is one of the members of the regional reference group mentioned earlier. The project's lawyer has conducted a legal lecture, for staff in the support residents for young migrants and

Please, identify the target groups, you involved in the project. Did you involve only migrants/refugees/asylum seekers? Were local youngsters involved? How many? What was their role in the project? Were the adults involved in the project? Which role did they play? Which methodology and methods were used in the implementation of the project activities? refugees in the City of Malmö, on new and temporary asylum legislation. All the legal guardians in the City of Malmö have also been given the opportunity to take part of the document we created with information about the first refusal of an unaccompanied child seeking asylum. TARGET GROUPS The target group is unaccompanied children and youths, which for various reasons is outside the asylum process. As part of our preventive work, we include young people who received a first refusal in their asylum process as they may also get a third refusal. We have only involved asylum seekers and young people up to 25 years old who are outside the asylum process. We have been in contact with approximately 160 young people, of whom about 40 are categorized as active. The target group controls the project. We always strive to realize their wishes regarding the operation. The reference group is important as their voices are used in impact work, debate articles, reporting and presentations of the project. During our first project year, four volunteers have been active. They have participated in our open operation, Swedish courses and planned for English courses in the spring. METHODOLOGY The project is based on a rights-based method where the target group's human rights strive to be fulfilled. When we have activities, they are usually requests from the youth themselves. It is important for us that the wishes and voices of target group are at the centre of our work, as they all have an extremely complicated existence in Sweden. The voices of young people are equally important when it comes to other activities such as workshops and the like. The seminar we organized is an example of our rights-based work, based on the Children's

Why and how Youth Workers and Youth work methodologies and approaches have been relevant to facilitate migrants inclusion? Were the used methodologies appropriate to work with young people and with young migrants? What kind of civic and citizen dimension is valued in the project? Do you feel that the differences were respected in this process? Were these differences enhanced to promote an intercultural Convention, which emphasizes both play and development as human rights. Since many in the target group are considered to be of age according to the Swedish state, though they claim they are not, we listen to the youth and try to implement the Children's Convention in our work. For us, it is natural to depart work out of the wishes of the target group. This rights-based approach aims to strengthen the youth and we are convinced that their wishes are an essential part of integration work. The rights-based method is a method that we consider to be well functioning. However, there is some problem using the method when many in the target group have been understood as 18 years of age, which means they lose many (youth) rights. However, we try to work rights-based, offering Swedish and English courses and with open activities. These examples are all based on the target market s demand and needs. In the second year, we want the solution-focused approach to become more applicable, based on the fact that we want to get more support with the target group. As we include a target group living illegally in Sweden with the aim of legalizing their stay, of course, the civil society perspective is strengthened. The project also works preventively from the fact that fewer unaccompanied people will disappear and live without identity documents, which also strengthens civil society and the non-profit sector. Today we see how Sweden's system does not work when people without identity documents end up in a form of limbo where they cannot live in Sweden legally but cannot be rejected. Differences are promoted based on the fact that we listen to the individual, for example, how we initially arranged reference group discussions in groups, and as from the second project year, these will be held

society/world? What has your project changed at local, or national or European level? Which criticisms, difficulties and obstacles have you met? How did you overcome them? Which elements of your project could be transferred individually. By listening to the individual, we believe that we increase our understanding of an intercultural society where we can, among other things, use the voices for opinion and influence. CHANGES The project is well established locally in Malmö, but also regionally. In 2017-2018, the project aims to reach more organizations and associations at a national level. We will also try to reach more people within the target group, especially more minors and more different nationalities. Today, as previously mentioned, our target group is homogeneous. In order to broaden the target group, we will continue to broaden our local and regional networks in the sense of presentations and collaborations. During the summer, a new field worker will be employed and we specifically search for female field workers, which may be a bridge to reach more girls. CHALLENGES One major challenge for us is to reach more girls, more minors and more nationalities. Unaccompanied people who disappear are at high risk of being exploited in various ways. Right now, our target group is homogeneous. The majority are Afghans, boys or young men and/or have gotten three (maximum) rejections. In order to extend the target group, we have, among other things, in a newsletter to all the legal guardians in the City of Malmö and informed about the project. We were specifically directed towards guardians whose youngsters are placed in an own support apartment. We also want to expand our outreach work by establishing new contacts with associations and organizations in Malmö, which we believe may come into contact with the target group. TRANSFERABILITY The project is based on voluntary forces. Since we are relatively unique in Sweden to the target group, I

in other contexts? Why and how? think many parts can be disseminated to other contexts. It is a target group that is likely to increase, but their visibility is closely connected to the (lack of) opportunity for them to tell their own stories. Many talk about the target group, but not many listen to them. Why you do think your project can be defined as a good practice? Why? Please mention at least 3 elements that define it as a good practice. Our legal guidance, field work and outreach work are additional examples that can be disseminated both nationally and at European level. GOOD PRACTICES The target group for the project is likely to increase in Sweden as well as in Europe. These parallel shadow communities bring an increased risk that children, young and young adults will be exploited and find themselves in vulnerable situations. Our project wants to legalize the stay for the target group; we also strive to include an excluded group to a social context where young people will be able to be young people. But above all we seek to give the target group a stronger voice in different contexts with the goal of creating debate and opinion regarding unaccompanied youths. ANY OTHER INFO Please, let us know any other details you believe interesting for the BpE project Thanks a lot for your contribution!