Case3:13-cv JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 4

Similar documents
Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 345 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES. FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURJD/f /':. - - ' - :_; o~r:r ~ WASHINGTON, D. C., _ fl J I r".~! '''

Case4:08-cv JSW Document320 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case4:08-cv JSW Document253 Filed06/27/14 Page1 of 31

Case4:08-cv JSW Document280 Filed09/18/14 Page1 of 12

CaseM:06-cv VRW Document716 Filed03/19/10 Page1 of 8

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:15-cv TSE Document 116 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) ) ) )

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 557 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 560 Filed 02/11/2009 Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case3:07-cv VRW Document103 Filed08/20/09 Page1 of 43

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case 1:11-cv AJT-MSN Document 188 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 2278

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 230 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 6

Case3:13-cv JSW Document66 Filed12/06/13 Page1 of 63

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case3:08 cv JSW Document119 Filed10/19/12 Page1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3

TOP SECRET//COMINTHNOFORN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

JOINT STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD OF JAMES R. CLAPPER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 104 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:06-cv GK Document 37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 122 Filed 08/26/2005 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:12-cv WWE Document 44 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv GBL -TRJ Document 74 Filed 03/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 661

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 238 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:07-cv VRW Document 31-2 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

Case 1:13-cv TSC-DAR Document 104 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 25 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 192 Filed 03/09/2006 Page 1 of 8

United States District Court

Case 3:07-cv VRW Document 54 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 19

SDNY.\ien'f .TRO~AU.Y'" UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

14 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT DIVISION GENERAL CIVIL RULES

FILED SEP NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK. Case 1:07-cv RBW Document 1 Filed 09/27/07 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 217 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:08-cv VRW Document33 Filed07/13/09 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREBY SUBMIT THE

Case 1:17-cv EGS Document 18 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 105 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 106

Case 1:10-cv RMC Document 46 Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

Case 1:18-cv JMF Document 379 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 7

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case 1:10-cv RMC Document 50 Filed 01/23/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:07-cv VRW Document 49 Filed 09/30/2008 Page 1 of 33

Case 1:10-cr RDB Document 71 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

BILLS PENDING AS OF 9/11/13 THAT RELATE TO NSA SURVEILLANCE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION NOTICE OF APPEAL

Case 1:15-cv TSE Document 103 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 12/22/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:435 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 123 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 2969

smb Doc 142 Filed 06/22/17 Entered 06/22/17 20:45:06 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN//MR UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C.

Case 1:13-cv ER-KNF Document Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:10-cv FJS Document 24 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv RMB Document 35 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 345 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 6

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

Case3:12-cv VC Document88 Filed06/09/15 Page1 of 2

u.s. Foreign Intelligence.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU -PART 47

Transcription:

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STUART F. DELERY Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Deputy Branch Director tony.coppolino@usdoj.gov JAMES J. GILLIGAN Special Litigation Counsel james.gilligan@usdoj.gov MARCIA BERMAN Senior Trial Counsel BRYAN DEARINGER Trial Attorney RODNEY PATTON Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 6102 Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 514-3358; Fax: (202) 616-8470 Attorneys for the Government Defs. in their Official Capacity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) CAROLYN JEWEL, et al., ) Case No. 3:08-cv-04373-JSW ) Case No. 3:13-cv-03287-JSW Plaintiffs, ) v. ) GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS ) RESPONSE TO THE COURT S ORDER NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., ) RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A ) TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Defendants. ) ) Date: March 10, 2014 ) FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF LOS ) Courtroom 11, 19th Floor ANGELES, et al., ) The Honorable Jeffrey S. White ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 25 26 27 28 The Government Defendants respond to the Court s Order re: Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order in the above-captioned actions as follows. Government Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for a TRO, Jewel v. National Security Agency (08-cv-4373-JSW), First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. National Security Agency (13-cv-3287-JSW) 1

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On February 25, 2014, the Government filed a motion before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ( FISC ) asking the FISC to amend its orders governing the NSA s bulk collection of telephony metadata pursuant to Section 215 of the USA-PATRIOT Act, 50 U.S.C. 1861, to permit the retention (off-line) of call-detail records beyond five years after their initial collection. Exh. 1 at 1. The Government made this request for the limited purpose of allowing it to comply with its common-law preservation obligations in several civil actions, including First Unitarian v. NSA, 3:13-cv-03287-JSW, that challenge the legality of the FISC-authorized Section 215 program. Id. at 1, 5, 7. The motion was filed on the public record and Plaintiffs counsel in the above-captioned actions became aware of it (as indicated in communications with Government counsel) no later than February 26, 2014. 1 On March 7, 2014, the FISC denied the Government s Motion. Exh. 2. The FISC noted that under its orders authorizing the NSA s collection of telephony metadata under Section 215, the Government must comply with minimization requirements that include a requirement that call-detail records collected under the FISC s orders be destroyed within five years of their acquisition. Exh. 2 at 2. Although recognizing the general obligation of civil litigants to preserve records that could potentially serve as evidence in a case, the FISC held that the statutory minimization requirements imposed by Section 215, 50 U.S.C. 1861(g)(2), which are 1 In particular, on February 26, after reviewing the Government s motion before the FISC, Plaintiffs contacted the Government Defendants counsel questioning why the Jewel (and Shubert) cases were not mentioned among the cases noted in the Government s motion. In response Government counsel advised that Jewel and Shubert were not listed among the cases referenced in the Government s motion before the FISC because the question of preservation of evidence had already been litigated in those cases and this Court had issued separate preservation orders that govern in those actions. See Pls. TRO Mot., Cohn Decl. Exh. E. Those orders followed the Government s submission of a classified ex parte declaration that described in detail the specific preservation steps the Government was taking. The orders direct the parties in Jewel and Shubert, inter alia, to halt business practices and processes that involve the destruction of materials reasonably anticipated to be subject to discovery in th[ose] action[s] to the extent practicable for the pendency of [the] order[s]. Unlike the cases challenging the legality of the Section 215 program, the claims in the Jewel and Shubert complaints challenge intelligence activities conducted without court approval. Government Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for a TRO, Jewel v. National Security Agency (08-cv-4373-JSW), First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. National Security Agency (13-cv-3287-JSW) 2

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 intended to prevent the retention or dissemination of U.S. person information except as necessary to obtain, produce, or disseminate foreign intelligence information, supersede the Government s common-law preservation obligations, at least on the record before it. Exh. 2 at 3-7. The FISC reasoned that the purpose for which the Government sought to retain the data beyond five years was not related to obtaining, producing, or disseminating foreign intelligence information, and therefore that, at least on the record before it, could not find that an exception to Section 215 s minimization requirements was permissible. Exh. 2 at 7-8. Therefore, in light of the FISC s March 7 order, the Government currently remains subject to orders of the FISC the Article II Court established by Congress with authority to issue orders pursuant to FISA and to impose specific minimization requirements which orders require the destruction of call-details records collected by the NSA pursuant to Section 215 that are more than five years old. In light of the obligations created by those orders, on March 7, 2014, upon receipt of the FISC s decision, the Government filed a notice in First Unitarian and other cases challenging the legality of the Section 215 telephony metadata program of the Government s intention, as of the morning of Tuesday, March 11, 2014, to comply with applicable FISC orders requiring the destruction of call-detail records at this time, absent a court order to the contrary. Exh. 3. The Government respectfully continues to believe that, absent a court order to the contrary. it must follow this course in order to discharge its obligations under the FISC s orders. Dated: March 10, 2014 Government Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for a TRO, Jewel v. National Security Agency (08-cv-4373-JSW), First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. National Security Agency (13-cv-3287-JSW) 3

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Respectfully Submitted, STUART F. DELERY Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Deputy Branch Director tony.coppolino@usdoj.gov MARCIA BERMAN Senior Trial Counsel BRYAN DEARINGER Trial Attorney RODNEY PATTON Trial Attorney By: /s/ James J. Gilligan JAMES J. GILLIGAN Special Litigation Counsel james.gilligan@usdoj.gov U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 6102 Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 514-3358 Fax: (202) 616-8470 Attorneys for the Government Defendants Sued in their Official Capacities 23 24 25 26 27 28 Government Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for a TRO, Jewel v. National Security Agency (08-cv-4373-JSW), First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. National Security Agency (13-cv-3287-JSW) 4

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 15 EXHIBIT 1

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page2 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page3 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page4 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page5 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page6 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page7 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page8 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page9 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page10 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page11 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page12 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page13 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page14 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-1 Filed03/10/14 Page15 of 15

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 13 EXHIBIT 2

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page2 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page3 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page4 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page5 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page6 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page7 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page8 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page9 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page10 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page11 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page12 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-2 Filed03/10/14 Page13 of 13

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-3 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 3 EXHIBIT 3

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-3 Document85 Filed03/07/14 Filed03/10/14 Page1 Page2 of of 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STUART F. DELERY Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Deputy Branch Director JAMES J. GILLIGAN Special Litigation Counsel MARCIA BERMAN Senior Trial Counsel marcia.berman@usdoj.gov BRYAN DEARINGER Trial Attorney RODNEY PATTON Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 7132 Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 514-2205; Fax: (202) 616-8470 Attorneys for the Government Defs. in their Official Capacities UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF LOS ANGELES, et al., v. Plaintiffs, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:13-cv-03287-JSW ) ) GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS ) NOTICE REGARDING ORDER OF ) THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ) SURVEILLANCE COURT ) The Government Defendants hereby provide notice regarding an order issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) today. On February 25, 2014, the United States filed a motion with the FISC for leave to retain call-detail records collected under the National Security Agency (NSA) bulk telephony metadata program beyond the five-year deadline by which FISC orders require the records to be destroyed. See Exh. 1, attached hereto. The United States filed that motion in order to ensure compliance with any preservation obligations the Government may have in this and other civil actions respecting those records. Today, the FISC Gov t Defs. Notice Regarding Order of the Foreign Intell. Surveillance Court (3:13-cv-03287-JSW)

Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document88-3 Document85 Filed03/07/14 Filed03/10/14 Page2 Page3 of of 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 issued an order denying that motion. See Exh. 2, attached hereto. Consistent with that order, as of the morning of Tuesday, March 11, 2014, absent a contrary court order, the United States will commence complying with applicable FISC orders requiring the destruction of call-detail records at this time. Dated: March 7, 2014 Respectfully submitted, STUART F. DELERY Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Deputy Branch Director /s/ Marcia Berman JAMES J. GILLIGAN Special Litigation Counsel MARCIA BERMAN Senior Trial Counsel BRYAN DEARINGER Trial Attorney RODNEY PATTON Trial Attorney U.S Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Room 6102 Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 514-3358 Fax: (202) 616-8202 Counsel for the Government Defendants Gov t Defs. Notice Regarding Order of the Foreign Intell. Surveillance Court (3:13-cv-03287-JSW) 2