SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants. General of the State of California, hereby alleges as follows:

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

-2- First Amended Complaint for Damages, Injunctive Relief and Restitution SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC ATTORNEY S AT LAW TEL: (510)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Plaintiff, Defendant. JEFF W. REISIG, District Attorney of Yolo County, by LARRY BARLLY, Supervising

Case 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Case 4:16-cv DMR Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

Case4:13-cv YGR Document23 Filed05/03/13 Page1 of 34

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Case No.: COMPLAINT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv DMG-JEM Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

wage statements that comply with California law (or provide wage statements at all). Finally,

Plaintiff Peter Alexander ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all others similarly

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

UNITED S TATES DIS TRICT COURT NORTHERN DIS TRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHELLE RENEE MCGRATH and VERONICA O BOY, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, United States v. Donald Sterling, et al. (C.D. Cal.)

FILED SAN MAteO COUNTY

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:07-cv TEH Document 1 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 13

R. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CA 5. Attorneys for Plaintiffs GREG PALOMARES and JESUS BALLESTEROS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Superior Court of California

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. NAOMI BOINUS-REEHORST, an individual;

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Superior Court of California

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT - 1 -

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: SOLARCITY CORPORATION,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiff proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and proposed Class

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Attorney for Plaintiff Sidney Greenbaum and the Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case3:14-cv LB Document7 Filed12/15/14 Page1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:18-cv DMG-SK Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/18 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:11

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SOUTHWEST JUSTICE CENTER. LYDIA HERNANDEZ, an individual,

("FLSA"). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the New York state law claims, as they. (212) (212) (fax)

Case 3:13-cv BTM-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 10/16/13 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT A

approximately 1,100other similarly situated employees at its facilities in the Freemont,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SARASOTA, MANATEE, DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv DMS-DHB Document 1 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 17

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALICIA HARRIS, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Transcription:

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California MARK J. BRECKLER Senior Assistant Attorney General JON M. ICHINAGA Supervising Deputy Attorney General SATOSHI YANAI Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 00 South Spring Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 001 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1 1 1 1 0 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, v. Plaintiff, AUTO SPA EXPRESS, INC., A CORPORATION; SUNSET CAR WASH, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, JONATHAN MIN KIM, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 0, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, RESTITUTION, AND CIVIL PENALTIES (Business & Professions Code Sections 00, et seq.) Plaintiff, the People of the State of California, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., as Attorney General of the State of California, hereby alleges as follows: PARTIES 1

1 1 1 1 0 1 1. Plaintiff Edmund G. Brown Jr. is the Attorney General of California and is the chief law officer of the State. (Cal. Const., art. V, 1.) The Attorney General is empowered by the California Constitution to take whatever action is necessary to ensure that the laws of the State are uniformly and adequately enforced. He is statutorily authorized to bring actions in the name of the People of the State of California to enforce California s statutes governing unfair competition. (Bus. & Prof. Code 0.). Defendant Auto Spa Express, Inc. ( ASE ) is a California corporation authorized to do business in the State of California. At various relevant times within the past four years, ASE owned and operated a car wash facility at 0 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, California, in the County of Los Angeles.. Defendant Sunset Car Wash, LLC ( SCW ) is a California limited liability corporation authorized to do business in the State of California. SCW succeeded ASE as the owner and operator of the car wash facility located at 0 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, California, in the County of Los Angeles, and currently operates the car wash facility.. Defendant Jonathan Min Kim ( Kim ) is an individual who is a principal and the primary owner of ASE. At all relevant times within the past four years, Kim has resided in Beverly Hills, California, in the County of Los Angeles.. The true names and capacities of defendants sued in the Complaint under the fictitious names DOES 1 through 0, inclusive, presently are unknown to People, who therefore sues such defendants by such fictitious names. The People will seek to amend this Complaint to allege the true names of DOES 1 through 0 when the same have been ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that each of the fictitiously named defendants participated in some part of the acts alleged herein.. Whenever reference is made in this Complaint to any act of ASE, such allegations shall mean that ASE, through its agents, employees, or representatives, performed or authorized such acts while said agents, emloyees, or representatives were acting within the actual or ostensible scope of their authority.

1 1 1 1 0 1. Whenever reference is made in this Complaint to any act of SCW, such allegations shall mean that SCW, through its agents, employees, or representatives, performed or authorized such acts while said agents, employees, or representatives were acting within the actual or ostensible scope of their authority. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATIONS OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 00 BY ASE AND KIM. The People reallege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 through of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.. Defendants ASE and Kim have violated and continue to violate Business and Professions Code Section 00 by engaging in acts of unfair competition within the past four years including, but not limited to, the following: a. failing to pay the State minimum wage to ASE s employees as required by Labor Code 1.1 (for the period beginning January 1, 00) and Cal. Code of Regs. 000 (for the period within the past four years but prior to January 1, 00); b. failing to pay overtime premium pay to ASE s employees as required by Wage Orders and, Cal. Code of Regs. 00 and 0; c. failing to provide accurate itemized statements of hours and wages to ASE s employees as required by Labor Code ; d. failing to report industrial injuries suffered by ASE s employees that resulted in lost time beyond the day of injury, or medical treatment beyond first aid, as required by Labor Code 0.1; e. failing to pay all State Unemployment Fund contributions based on wages paid to ASE employees, as required by Unemp. Ins. Code ; f. failing to pay all State Employment Training Fund contributions based on wages paid to ASE employees, as required by Unemp. Ins. Code.; g. failing to withhold and transmit all State Disability Fund contributions on behalf of ASE employees, as required by Unemp. Ins. Code ;

1 1 1 1 0 1 h. failing to withhold and transmit all State income taxes on behalf of ASE employees, as required by Unemp. Ins. Code 0 and 1. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATIONS OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 00 BY SCW. The People reallege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 through of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.. Defendant SCW has violated and continues to violate Business and Professions Code Section 00 by engaging in acts of unfair competition within the past four years including, but not limited to, the following: a. withholding the unpaid wages of ASE s former employees, which SCW is liable for as a successor employer offering substantially the same services and using substantially the same facilities as its predecessor employer, pursuant to Labor Code Section 0. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the People pray for the following relief: 1. Pursuant to Business and Profession Code Section 0, that defendants, their successors, agents, representatives, employees, and all persons acting in concert or in participation with defendants, be permanently enjoined from engaging in unfair competition as defined in Business & Professions Code Section 00, including, but not limited to, the acts and practices alleged in this Complaint.. Pursuant to Business and Profession Code Section 0, that defendants be ordered to provide restitution to former ASE workers of any unpaid wages, in a total amount of no less than $0,000.00, or as established at trial.. Pursuant to Business and Profession Code Section 0, that the Court assess a civil penalty of two thousand five hundred dollars ($,00.00) against defendants for each violation of Business and Professions Code Section 00, in a total amount of no less than $,000,000.00 each against ASE and Kim, and no less than $0,000.00 against SCW, or as established at trial.. That the People recover their costs of suit.

. Such other and further relief that the Court deems appropriate and just. 1 1 1 1 0 1 Dated: December 1, 00 Respectfully Submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California MARK J. BRECKLER Senior Assistant Attorney General JON M. ICHINAGA Supervising Deputy Attorney General SATOSHI YANAI Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Plaintiff