UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) vs. ) ) PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC. ) ) Defendant.

Similar documents
Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECARATORY RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP. and AVX CORPORATION CIVIL NO.: Plaintiffs, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs. PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC. Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs American Technical Ceramics Corp. ("ATC" and AVX Corporation ("AVX" (collectively "Plaintiffs", by their attorneys, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P.C. and Nutter, McClennen & Fish LLP, as and for its Complaint against Defendant Presidio Components, Inc. ("Presidio" or "Defendant" allege as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 1400(b. 2. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a. 3. Venue is proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b, and (c and PARTIES 4. Plaintiff ATC is a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at 1 Norden Lane, Huntington Station, New York 11746.

5. Plaintiff AVX is a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at One AVX Boulevard, Fountain Inn, South Carolina 29644. 6. Upon information and belief, Defendant Presidio is a California corporation having its principal place of business at 7169 Construction Court, San Diego, California 92121. Upon further information and belief, Presidio is doing business in this judicial district, either directly or through a distribution network, and is committing acts of patent infringement in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. COUNT I (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,337,791 7. The allegations of paragraphs 1-6 above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 8. This claim is made under the provisions of the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 9. ATC owns U.S. Patent No. 6,337,791 ("the '791 patent", which was duly and legally issued on January 8, 2002 and is entitled "Capacitor Featuring Internal Electrode With Pad." Richard Monsorno is listed as the sole inventor of the '791 patent. A copy of the '791 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 10. In violation of ATC's patent rights under the '791 Patent, Presidio has been and is infringing one or more of the claims of the '791 Patent by importing, making, using, selling and/or offering for sale certain of its capacitors, including, but not limited to, its Surface Mount Buried Broadband Capacitors and Surface Mount Buried Single Layer Capacitors, in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States, all without the authorization or consent of ATC. 2

11. Presidio knew of the existence of the '791 patent at least as early as February 11, 2005, when it disclosed the '791 patent to the PTO during prosecution of its own patent application which later issued as U.S. Patent No. 7,035,080. On information and belief, Presidio is actively monitoring and analyzing other capacitor manufacturers' patents and products, including ATC's, and keeps such technological developments in mind when designing and customizing its own products. Despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constitute or are highly likely to constitute infringement of the '791 patent given Presidio's actual knowledge of the '791 patent and its practice of developing capacitors, Presidio continues to import, make, use, sell or offer for sale certain of its capacitors, including, but not limited to, its Surface Mount Buried Broadband Capacitors and Surface Mount Buried Single Layer Capacitors, in violation of ATC's patent rights in the '791 patent. Accordingly, Presidio's acts of infringement are willful. 12. Presidio's acts of infringement have left ATC with no adequate remedy at law and have caused, are causing, and if not enjoined will continue to cause, irreparable damage to ATC. 13. Presidio's acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause ATC to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT II (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,992,879 14. The allegations of paragraphs 1-13 above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 15. This claim is made under the provisions of the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 16. ATC owns U.S. Patent No. 6,992,879 ("the '879 patent", which was duly and legally issued on January 31, 2006 and is entitled "Capacitor With Buried Electrode." Richard 3

Monsorno is listed as the sole inventor of the '879 patent. A copy of the '879 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 17. In violation of ATC's patent rights under the '879 Patent, Presidio has been and is infringing one or more of the claims of the '879 Patent by importing, making, using, selling and/or offering for sale certain of its capacitors, including, but not limited to, its Surface Mount Buried Broadband Capacitors, in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States, all without the authorization or consent of ATC. 18. On information and belief, Presidio knew of the existence of the '879 patent on or about the time of its issuance on January 31, 2006. The PTO cited U.S. application publication no. 2002/0067588 corresponding to the '879 patent to Presidio during prosecution of Presidio's patent application which later issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,970,341. On information and belief, Presidio is actively monitoring and analyzing other capacitor manufacturers' patents and products, including ATC's, and keeps such technological developments in mind when designing and customizing its own products. Despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constitute or are highly likely to constitute infringement of the '879 patent given Presidio's knowledge of the '879 patent and its practice of developing capacitors, Presidio continues to import, make, use, sell or offer for sale certain of its capacitors, including, but not limited to, its Surface Mount Buried Broadband Capacitors, in violation of ATC's patent rights in the '879 patent. Accordingly, Presidio's acts of infringement are willful. 19. Presidio's acts of infringement have left ATC with no adequate remedy at law and have caused, are causing, and if not enjoined will continue to cause, irreparable damage to ATC. 20. Presidio's acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause ATC to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 4

COUNT III (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,144,547 21. The allegations of paragraphs 1-20 above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 22. This claim is made under the provisions of the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 23. AVX owns U.S. Patent No. 6,144,547 ("the '547 patent", which was duly and legally issued on November 7, 2000 and is entitled "Miniature surface mount capacitor and method of making same." Gennady Retseptor is listed as the sole inventor of the '547 patent. ATC is the exclusive licensee of the '547 patent with the right to sue for past and present infringement. A copy of the '547 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 24. In violation of ATC's patent rights under the '547 Patent, Presidio has been and is infringing one or more of the claims of the '547 Patent by importing, making, using, selling and/or offering for sale certain of its capacitors, including, but not limited to, its Surface Mount Buried Broadband Capacitors and Surface Mount Buried Single Layer Capacitors, in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States, all without the authorization or consent of Plaintiffs. 25. Presidio's acts of infringement have left Plaintiffs with no adequate remedy at law and have caused, are causing, and if not enjoined will continue to cause irreparable damage to Plaintiffs. 26. Presidio's acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause Plaintiffs to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that the Court: A. Enter judgment that Presidio has infringed, and continues to infringe, U.S. Patents 5

Nos. 6,337,791, 6,992,879 and 6,144,547; B. Enter judgment that Presidio's acts of patent infringement are willful; C. Permanently enjoin Presidio, its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, officers, agents, servants, employees, directors, partners, representatives, all individuals and entities in active concert and/or participation with it, and all individuals and/or entities within its control from engaging in the aforesaid unlawful acts of infringement; D. Order Presidio to account for and pay to Plaintiffs all damages caused to Plaintiffs by Presidio's unlawful acts of patent infringement; E. Award Plaintiffs increased damages and attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285; F. Award Plaintiffs the interest and costs incurred in this action; and G. Grant Plaintiffs such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. Dated: November 6, 2014 By: Marvin S. Gittes, Esq. (MG - 6112 Timur E. Slonim, Esq. (TS - 0915 Peter F. Snell, Esq. (PS - 0796 Brad M. Scheller, Esq. (BD - 4603 666 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Tel.: (212 935-3000 Fax: (212 983-3115 Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP. and AVX CORPORATION OF COUNSEL: 6

Ronald E. Cahill, Esq. E-mail: rcahill@nutter.com Heather Repicky, Esq. E-mail: hrepicky@nutter.com NUTTER, MCCLENNEN & FISH LLP Seaport West 155 Seaport Boulevard, Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: (617 439-2782 Facsimile: (617 310-9782