WebRoots Democracy submission to the Speaker s Commission on Digital Democracy

Similar documents
SAMARA S 2017 DEMOCRACY 360: APPENDIX

The case for piloting online voting in elections.

Every Vote Counts! Voting. Register to vote. Find out how you can vote and campaign!

Additional Case study UK electoral system

Elections Alberta Survey of Voters and Non-Voters

AHR SURVEY: NATIONAL RESULTS

Where Have All the Voters Gone?

ST. ANTHONY PARISH TAUNTON, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

3ο Digital Session Social Media Reloaded: The new fundamentals

Voting in Scotland. Scottish Government Consultation on Electoral Reform 2018

The UK General Election 2017

Voter and non-voter survey report

Standing for office in 2017

Local elections. Referendum on the voting system used to elect MPs to the House of Commons

FINAL REPORT. Public Opinion Survey at the 39th General Election. Elections Canada. Prepared for: May MacLaren Street Ottawa, ON K2P 0M6

Survey Research Memo:

Feedback on voter identification pilots

Children's Referendum Poll

Easy Read Guide to Voting in the May local elections in England

Elections for everyone. Experiences of people with disabilities at the 8 June 2017 UK Parliamentary general election

Submission to the Speaker s Digital Democracy Commission

BY Amy Mitchell, Tom Rosenstiel and Leah Christian

Members of Parliament The Houses of Parliament The Labour Party

Nonvoters in America 2012

Local Government and Communities Committee. Scottish Local Government Elections and Voting

British Citizenship Test Answers Equality Review Autumn 2011

Why your members aren t voting. A GUIDE TO INCREASING VOTER TURNOUT AND PARTICIPATION

Nominee the person or group you are nominating

ELITE AND MASS ATTITUDES ON HOW THE UK AND ITS PARTS ARE GOVERNED VOTING AT 16 WHAT NEXT? YEAR OLDS POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND CIVIC EDUCATION

8-12. A Multilingual Treasure Hunt. Subject: Preparation: Learning Outcomes: Total Time: Citizenship, PHSE, Languages, Geography,

Vote Preference in Jefferson Parish Sheriff Election by Gender

ScotlandSeptember18.com. Independence Referendum Survey. January Phase 1 and 2 results TNS. Independence Referendum Survey

Vermonters Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Sprawl Development in 2002

The March 2017 Northern Ireland Assembly election

NEVADA: CLINTON LEADS TRUMP IN TIGHT RACE

Public opinion and the 2002 local elections

Electoral Reform Questionnaire Field Dates: October 12-18, 2016

In Attendance: Sharon Salvanos, Carl Whistlecraft, Spencer Wilson, Diane Sims, Richard Dunne

Awareness of and Attitudes Towards Voting in the 2016 Auckland Council Elections. June 2017 Technical Report 2017/013

FAITH AND CITIZENSHIP

DSB: Increasing member participation in conference

Let s get digital! 1

9. Age is a strong predictor of political engagement: people vote more often. A) middle-aged B) younger C) older D) elderly

Issue Overview: Are social networking sites good for our society?

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH NEW BEDFORD, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Voting and Non-Voting in Christchurch City

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Essential Skills Wales Essential Communication Skills (ECommS) Level 3 Controlled Task Candidate Pack

Scottish Parliamentary election

The Rising American Electorate

SURVEY ON PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF INEC (POST-2015 NIGERIA GENERAL ELECTION) SURVEY ON PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF INEC (POST-2015 NIGERIA GENERAL ELECTION)

P O LL I N G A N A LY TI C S D ATA BA N K S TR ATE G Y

The Hansard Society is the UK s leading independent, non-partisan political research and education charity.

Consultation Response: Electoral Pilots at the C.E.P. and Local Elections

Mass Biometric Voter registration Lessons from Kenya

GCSE CITIZENSHIP STUDIES

State of the Facts 2018

Polling Districts and Polling Places Review 2015 Public Consultation Document

DIGITAL NEWS CONSUMPTION IN AUSTRALIA

Public Opinion on Health Care Issues October 2012

THE PORTUGUESE-AMERICAN FORUM SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

WDSU TV & The University of New Orleans Survey Research Center Jefferson Parish Sheriff s Election Survey

DOMESTIC ELECTION OBSERVATION KEY CONCEPTS AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

WELCOME Poll Deputy Primary Election Training

Towards Effective Youth Participation

Topic: Understanding Citizenship

Electoral Reform in Local Government in Wales

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE!

Individual Electoral Registration

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll. Dayton Jumps to Double-Digit Lead Over Emmer

Electoral reform in local government in Wales - Consultation

NATIONAL: TRUMP S TAX TIME TROUBLES

Political Beliefs and Behaviors

Evidence Submission: Inquiry into Voter Engagement

Continued Support for U.S. Drone Strikes

UNLOCK! The Vote. The Georgia Council on Developmental Disabilities June 13, 2018

Election Innovation Challenge. Lauren Thomas Science Leadership Academy

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March, 2017, Large Majorities See Checks and Balances, Right to Protest as Essential for Democracy

Analysis of Compulsory Voting in Gujarat

REPORT ON THE Evaluations of the 41st General Election

This report is formatted for double-sided printing.

NEVADA: TRUMP OVERTAKES CLINTON

Political snakes and ladders. If you decide to cast your vote in person where do you go?

FAQ s Voting Method & Appropriateness to PICC Elections

NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE JAMAICA TRIP REPORT April 11, 2002

Flash Eurobarometer 364 ELECTORAL RIGHTS REPORT

*Embargoed Until Monday, Nov. 7 th at 7am EST* The 2016 Election: A Lead for Clinton with One Day to Go November 2-6, 2016

An introduction to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and electoral reviews

Intro to Doubleclick Democracy

Pew Research News IQ Quiz What the Public Knows about the Political Parties

Orange County Registrar of Voters. Survey Results 72nd Assembly District Special Election

Hatch Opens Narrow Lead Over Pawlenty

MOST NEW JERSEYANS SUPPORT CHRISTIE S APPEARANCE IN STORM ADS BUT THINK COMMERCIALS CREATORS CHOSEN FOR POLITICAL REASONS

Politicians as Media Producers

European Movement Ireland Research Poll. April 2017 Ref:

Minnesota State Politics: Battles Over Constitution and State House

Utilization of Information Technology for Electoral Management. Mr.Cholaraj Phewban Inspector General, Office of The Election Commission of Thailand

European Parliament Elections: Turnout trends,

Social Justice and Tackling Poverty. Scottish Government Joanna Shedden

A Kit for Community Groups to Demystify Voting

Transcription:

WebRoots Democracy submission to the Speaker s Commission on Digital Democracy Introduction. WebRoots Democracy is a pressure group campaigning for the introduction of an online voting option in Local and General Elections in the United Kingdom. In addition to this, we are an organisation that intends to reverse growing political apathy and low electoral turnout in the UK, particularly amongst young people. Whilst political apathy has a variety of causes, we recognise that we live in an age of distraction and rapid technological advances. As such, we are also campaigning for an accessible, informative, and interactive election website to help reach out to new voters. We are working with youth organisations, disability charities, academics, electronic voting providers, political parties, politicians, and other public individuals to achieve the aims of our campaign. WebRoots Democracy is an independent, non-partisan organisation. Recommendation. WebRoots Democracy recommends that the Speaker s Commission supports the introduction of an online voting option in UK elections so as to help create an accessible democracy fit for the 21 st Century.

Initial findings. WebRoots Democracy is currently conducting research into online voting before publishing a detailed report on the subject later this year. As part of this, we are asking people across the UK to take part in our survey into online voting and internet usage. We would like to share our initial findings with the Commission to help inform their view. Current sample size: 164 respondents. 151 of these have completed the survey online. The results from the online survey are detailed below; those from the paper version are not yet available. 54% of respondents are aged 16 to 25. 90% of respondents said they are interested in politics. 89% use Facebook and 87% use Twitter. 53% use Instagram and 45% are on Snapchat. 90% said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take 96% have signed an online petition before. 71% said they would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. 88% think there should be the option of being able to vote online in UK elections. 53% of these respondents are female. 58% are aged between 16 and 25.

Only 12 respondents said that they are not interested in politics and is thus a figure that currently holds little statistical significance. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note the following: 11 of these respondents believe the internet has made them more aware of political issues. 8 said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take part in political action. 10 have signed an online petition before. 11 said they would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. All 12 said that they think there should be the option of being able to vote online in UK elections. 10 of these respondents are female. 7 are aged between 16 and 25. 72% of respondents said they voted in the May 2014 Local Council and European Parliament election. 91% use Facebook and 87% use Twitter. 49% are on Instagram and 42% use Snapchat. 93% said the internet has made them more aware of political issues. 90% said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take 97% have signed an online petition before. 68% said they would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. 88% think there should be the option of being able to vote online in UK elections.

Of the 28% that did not vote in the May 2014 Local Council and European Parliament election: 86% use Facebook and Twitter. 64% are on Instagram and 60% use Snapchat. 93% said the internet has made them more aware of political issues. 83% said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take 88% have signed an online petition before. 83% said they would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. 91% think there should be the option of being able to vote online in UK elections. 91% of respondents believe the internet has made them more aware of political issues. 89% use Facebook and 87% use Twitter. 54% are on Instagram and 47% use Snapchat. 89% said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take 95% have signed an online petition before. 73% said they would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. 89% think there should be the option of being able to vote online in UK elections.

93% of respondents have signed an online petition before. 89% use Facebook and 87% use Twitter. 53% are on Instagram and 46% use Snapchat. 93% said the internet has made them more aware of political issues. 88% said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take 71% said they would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. 88% think there should be the option of being able to vote online in UK elections. 71% would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. 91% use Facebook and 87% use Twitter. 60% are on Instagram and 51% use Snapchat. 94% said the internet has made them more aware of political issues. 94% said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take 94% have signed an online petition before. 100% think there should be the option of being able to vote online in UK elections. 56% of these respondents are female. 60% are aged between 16 and 25.

88% believe the UK should introduce an online voting option. 91% use Facebook and 87% use Twitter. 53% are on Instagram and 49% use Snapchat. 93% said the internet has made them more aware of political issues. 91% said the internet has made it easier for or been used to encourage them to take 94% have signed an online petition before. 81% said they would be more likely to vote if they could do so online. 56% of these respondents are female. 57% are aged between 16 and 25. What have people been saying? It would make voting more accessible. Half the battle isn t persuading people why they should vote, it s actually about ensuring they take the time to have their say. Online voting would be a more convenient, easier and familiar experience. Modern life revolves around computers and the internet, it s time the political system caught up. More people are likely to engage and the country s leaders would be more reflective of the UK s opinions. It will attract a younger generation to vote for whom the idea of going to a school or parish hall is anathema. An online process would be really beneficial to those who can t be there to vote in person.

Reasons for not voting last May. I was still at work, unable to get to a polling station. Couldn t be bothered. I was away on a business trip. I don t know enough about what I m voting for. Disability issues. I was at work during the day and didn t have childcare to go out and vote. Family emergency. The UK s digital landscape. The UK s current digital landscape (Office for National Statistics - ONS - figures) 37.6million adults log onto the internet every day which is more than double the figure in 2006. 74% of people aged 55 to 64 use the internet daily compared to 36% in 2006. 42% of over 65s use the internet daily compared to 9% in 2006. 86% of 25 to 44 year olds use the internet daily as do 79% of 16 to 24 year olds. 84% of UK households have access to the internet compared with 49% in 2004 (when Facebook was founded) and 9% in 1998 (when Google was founded). 58% of people use the internet on their phones, 34 percentage points higher than 2010. 87% of young people use the internet on their phone. 11% of over 65s use the internet on their phone, and increase of nine percentage points compared to 2010. Figures of on-the-go usage are higher when laptops and tablets are taken into account, with 68% in total using the internet on-the-go. 96% of 16 to 24 year olds use the internet on-the-go as do 80% of 25-34 year olds.

75% of people send emails. 74% of people shop online (87% of these transactions involving the provision of credit or debit card details over the internet). 55% of people access news online. 54% of people use social network websites. 53% of people bank online (an increase of 23 percentage points compared to 2007). 32% of the adult population have used the internet to complete and submit official forms. 23% of people use the internet for selling goods and services. 10% of people book GP appointments online. 91% of 16 to 24 year olds use social networking. 73% of 25 to 34 year olds access news online. Concluding comments. Comment from Areeq Chowdhury, WebRoots Democracy founder and chief executive: The method of voting in the UK has remained largely unchanged in the past 142 years since Hugh Childers was re-elected as an MP in the first ballot box election in 1872. Since that time, the way that people live their lives and interact with society has undergone dramatic advances allowing greater ease, efficiency, and accessibility. No longer do people travel by horse and carriage; they use cars, buses, trains and planes. No longer do people prefer homing pigeons, landlines and letters to communicate; they can Skype, WhatsApp, and Facebook each other. And as we have seen from the ONS data provided in this submission, more and more people in the UK, year on year are utilising the opportunities that the internet provides for education, information, and financial transactions. It is time therefore, that we recognise this cultural shift, one which has become greater in recent decades, and adapt our electoral system accordingly.

The ideal has to be to create a system where every citizen votes and votes willingly. Online voting can help move the UK towards this ideal. Whilst it certainly isn t a silver bullet to the political apathy, the introduction of an online voting can help enable millions of the current population (in addition to the future more digital population) have their voice heard in the political process. Issues such as political scandals, foregone elections, and out-of-touch politicians definitely do turn some people away from politics, but we must not ignore the changing culture of the modern age. We live in a society that increasingly turns to email instead of the Royal Mail, is banking online instead of queuing offline, and is communicating with each other at unprecedented levels. I hope the initial findings from our survey provided in this document serves to be a useful indicator of how people, particularly young people (the future of this country), learn about and engage with political issues through the internet. Almost 9 out of 10 of our survey respondents are in favour of online voting, and almost three quarters believe it would make them more likely to vote. Whilst we have not finished this research, our initial findings are reflective of similar studies both carried out this year by Sky News but also in 2007 within the Citizenship Foundation Survey on the issue. Online voting has a plethora of benefits not only for accessibility, but for creating more informed voters, eliminating accidentally spoilt ballots, and boosting turnout and legitimacy not just in national elections, but for smaller elections such as by-elections and PCC elections. However, what I believe to be the most important consideration on this issue is that an online voting option would not simply provide another way to tick a box, it could revolutionise the way we run elections and future-proof them for the generations of UK citizens in the rest of the 21 st Century. I would urge to Commission to consider the concerns about security and risk with an online voting option that those who are against the reform are likely to highlight. However, risk and security issues exist in every corner of life and society. What is important is mitigating that risk and weighing it up against the benefits. There are numerous examples of electronic elections that have been secured across the world and within the UK. There are even more examples of sensitive online services used such as online banking, but also within the Government. The 2011 Census is a good example of this, but also the Government s use of cloud storage services for sensitive documents across Whitehall.

In addition to this, the tens of millions of UK citizens that use social media, online banking, and online shopping is strong evidence that citizens have trust in internet services. Going back to the beginning of this statement, at every stage of technological cultural advancement, there will have been questions of risk and security. History has shown that these issues can be overcome and that the benefits have been immense. The UK is often pointed to as a leader in democracy. However, with regards to digital democratic reforms, in particular with the introduction of online voting, the UK has been noticeably lacking. I hope the Commission s recommendations can spark the beginning of the UK s leadership in this area. WebRoots Democracy will be releasing a report later this year that will look into the potential for online voting in greater detail, in particular looking at costs, benefits, pilots, and security. Kind regards and good luck. Areeq Chowdhury