UNIAO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Similar documents
THE PORTUGUESE ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL SERVICES AND OPPORTUNITIES SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

PORTUGUESE SOCIAL CLUB PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS February 25, 2010

ST. FRANCIS XAVIER PARISH EAST PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH NEW BEDFORD, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

THE PORTUGUESE-AMERICAN FORUM SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

ST. ANTHONY PARISH PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

SOCIEDADE ESPIRITO SANTO CORP. SANTA CLARA, CA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

ST. ANTHONY PARISH TAUNTON, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

ESPIRITO SANTO PARISH FALL RIVER, MA. EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

PORTUGUESE SOCIAL CLUB PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS July 23, 2007

ST. ANTHONY PARISH TAUNTON, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

AMIGOS DE TERCEIRA STATE OF RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

PORTUGUESE-AMERICAN POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT IN MASSACHUSETTS AND CALIFORNIA 1

Engaging New Voters: The Impact of Nonprofit Voter Outreach on Client and Community Turnout

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? Republicans 28% Democrats 84% 10 6

Historical unit prices - Super - Australian Shares

Working Paper Series. Estimation of Voter Turnout by Age Group and Gender at the 2011 Federal General Election

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America 9/17/2014

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2015, On Immigration Policy, Wider Partisan Divide Over Border Fence Than Path to Legal Status

2018 Election Calendar Wyoming Secretary of State s Office Election Division -

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

INTRODUCING. Wednesday, March 9th 1871

FINAL REPORT. Public Opinion Survey at the 39th General Election. Elections Canada. Prepared for: May MacLaren Street Ottawa, ON K2P 0M6

Florida Statewide January 2016

VOTER ENGAGEMENT FOR OHIO NONPROFITS. Getty Images Gabriel Hackett

Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments Civil Rights. Amendments Civil Rights

Teleconference Invitation

2. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Congress is doing? Sep 08 17% 73 9 Democrats 28% Sep 08 23% 68 8 Republicans 10% 87 3

Texas Voting & Elections (Chapter 04) Dr. Michael Sullivan. Texas State Government GOVT 2306 Houston Community College

Introduction. CJEC Estimated Prison Admissions Versus Actual Admissions* Number of Inmate Admissions 3,000 2,702 2,574 2,394 2,639 2,526 2,374

7 May Questions 1-16 released separately

6. 9. How frustrated and upset are you with [ITEM] these days? (RANDOMIZE)

What to Expect from California s New Motor Voter Law

Schedule DM Sheet 3 MULTIFAMILY ACCOMMODATION - RESIDENTIAL HOTEL - QUALIFYING RV PARK. (Continued)

Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please

The Latino Electorate in 2010: More Voters, More Non-Voters

Cairns Airport financial year passenger totals.

1: HOW DID YOUTH VOTER TURNOUT DIFFER FROM THE REST OF THE 2012 ELECTORATE?

Building the Base: Voter Registration of Low Income Renters and Their Allies

Participatory Voting: How do you create a compelling incentive to improve young voter engagement in local elections?

Obama vs. Romney: Is It the Economy, Stupid?

Political Environment and Congressional Breakdown Charts. November 7, 2017

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, August, 2016, On Immigration Policy, Partisan Differences but Also Some Common Ground

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

LECTURE #1: THE OREGON SYSTEM OF ELECTIONS

2014 VOTERIZATION Plan

Political Environment and Congressional Breakdown Charts. August 23, 2017

Voter Turnout by Income 2012

Millions to the Polls

2018 Election Calendar Wyoming Secretary of State s Office Election Division -

Who is registered to vote in Illinois?

Student Performance Q&A:

FOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018

Political Environment and Congressional Breakdown Charts. October 17, 2017

WELCOME TO STUDENT VOTER REGISTRATION DAY

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll

Political Environment and Congressional Breakdown Charts. December 12, 2017

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, June, 2015, Broad Public Support for Legal Status for Undocumented Immigrants

The situation of refugees in Austria. WAPES Conference, Integration of refugees into the labour market

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

Supreme Court s Favorability Edges Below 50%

Voter Education Lessons on Elections and Voting in Minnesota For English Language and Citizenship Classes

President Election Poll

Voting and Elections. CIVICS Education - KELLY

POLL: CLINTON MAINTAINS BIG LEAD OVER TRUMP IN BAY STATE. As early voting nears, Democrat holds 32-point advantage in presidential race

For Voters It s Still the Economy

Health Care Speech Brings Small Rebound for Democrats and Serious Problems for Republicans

Elections and Voting Behavior

MI-WIC update. Release 4.7 December 10, Web Cast 11/30/10

Secure and Fair Elections (S.A.F.E.) Act Regulations

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 07, 2017

Tariff 9900: OHD Percentage Based Fuel Cost Adjustment Historical Schedule ( )

Nevada Poll Results Tarkanian 39%, Heller 31% (31% undecided) 31% would renominate Heller (51% want someone else, 18% undecided)

9/1/11. Key Terms. Key Terms, cont.

2. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Congress is doing? Dec 07 25% Democrats 62% Nov 07 26% Republicans 19% 74 8

This report is formatted for double-sided printing.

Inside the 2012 Latino Electorate

GOP Seen as Principled, But Out of Touch and Too Extreme

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

The Youth Vote 2004 With a Historical Look at Youth Voting Patterns,

Appendix D: Survey Toplines

Preparing Every Young Voter. The Future of California Elections Los Angeles, California March 8, 2018 By Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg

Nonvoters in America 2012

Chart A Initial Release Decisions for Criminal Justice Reform Eligible Defendants January 1 December 31, 2017

Highlights: The Relationship and Division of Powers between the Federal and State Governments SS.7.C.3.4

A Three Pronged Approach to Improving Civic Engagement

Dynamic Results in Real-Time

Fiscal Year Adopted Budget

University of North Florida Public Opinion Research Lab

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February 2014, Public Divided over Increased Deportation of Unauthorized Immigrants

Objectives and Context

Who Votes for America s Mayors?

The Rising American Electorate

Why Are Millions of Citizens Not Registered to Vote?

CHARLOTTE: FACING THE CHALLENGES OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND MOBILITY

(READ AND RANDOMIZE LIST)

A SPECIAL REPORT ON STUDENT VOTING HABITS FROM 2012 AND 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

Do you feel things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track? 67% 56% 51% 51% 49% 49%

Transcription:

The Portuguese American Citizenship Project A non-partisan initiative to promote citizenship and civic involvement UNIAO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS March 16, 2009 Supported by the

2 REPORT CONTENTS STATISTICS AND SUMMARY OF WORK 3 RESULTS 4 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 APPENDIX 9

3 KEY STATISTICS Number of Members in Stanislaus County: 1,227 Heads of Household registered to vote in Stanislaus County: 357 (29% residing in Stanislaus County) All Household Members registered to vote in Stanislaus County: 604 Heads of Household voter turnout * in February 2008 67% (county-wide turnout 43%) Heads of Household voter turnout in June 2008 44% (county-wide turnout 22%) Heads of Household voter turnout in November 2008 85% (county-wide turnout 71%) SUMMARY OF WORK Uniao Portuguesa do Estado de California (UPEC) has been an active participant in the Portuguese American Citizenship Project since 2003. For the 2008 February, June, and November elections, postcards in Portuguese and English were sent to every registered voter in the organization reminding them of the date and polling hours for each election. * Voter turnout is the number of citizens voting in an election divided by the total number of citizens registered to vote. Voter turnout for each election is based on Stanislaus county residents only.

4 RESULTS In Stanislaus county, UPEC heads of household voter turnout for the 2008 elections was higher than the countywide turnout. Heads of household turnout for the February Presidential Primary elections was 67%, as compared to the countywide turnout of 43%. For the June Primary elections heads of household turnout was 44%, as compared to the countywide turnout of 22%. UPEC heads of household turnout for the November Presidential election was 85%, as compared to the countywide turnout of 71%. Voter turnout for all family members is not uniform across age groups. Voters under 30 years of age and even those between 30 and 40 years old had lower turnout rates than the older voters. This is true for the registered voters who are members of the UPEC and true for the registered voters in the community at large. For example, registered voters associated with UPEC under 30 years old had a 47% turnout rate in the February elections, while voters between 60 and 70 years old had a 77% turnout rate. For the June elections, the under 30 year old associated voters had a 14% turnout rate compared to a 56% turnout rate for voters between 60 and 70 years old. Voters associated with UPEC under 30 years old had a 81% turnout rate in the November Presidential elections, while voters between 60 and 70 years old had a 92% turnout rate. The following graphs for the February, June, and November 2008 elections illustrate the relationship between turnout rates and age. These graphs refer to all family members associated with the organization, not just heads of household.

5 TURNOUT BY AGE FEBRUARY 2008 UNIÃO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 90% 80% 70% 60% UPEC TURNOUT 50% STANISLAUS COUNTY TURNOUT 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% AGE<30 30<AGE<40 40<AGE<50 50<AGE<60 60<AGE<70 AGE>70

6 TURNOUT BY AGE JUNE 2008 UNIÃO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 60% 50% UPEC TURNOUT 40% 30% STA NISLAUS COUNTY TURNOUT 20% 10% 0% AGE<30 30<AGE<40 40<AGE<50 50<AGE<60 60<AGE<70 AGE>70

7 TURNOUT BY AGE NOVEMBER 2008 UNIÃO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 100% 90% 80% UPEC TURNOUT 70% STA NISLAUS COUNTY TURNOUT 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% AGE<30 30<AGE<40 40<AGE<50 50<AGE<60 60<AGE<70 AGE>70

8 RECOMMENDATIONS UPEC must determine if and how it will provide funding for the costs of participation in the Citizenship Project. The Luso American Foundation has completed 10 years of financial support for the Project but will terminate this support for 2009 and beyond. In 2009, the Project will continue to provide data processing and assist in the preparation of voter cards. With a mailing permit, the cost of printing and mailing the cards for a June Primary, and November City elections is approximately $700. If UPEC cannot provide the financial support for this mailing and/or cannot accomplish the logistics of printing and mailing the voter cards, interested members of the community should examine the accomplishments of the past ten years and determine how to build on these achievements using alternative methods of promoting civic participation. The voter registration rate for UPEC s heads of household 29 percent is low compared to most other participating groups in the Portuguese American Citizenship Project. Many members are probably not U.S. citizens, and many who are U.S. citizens have not yet registered to vote. These two problems must be addressed both for the benefit of UPEC, but also for the benefit of the individuals themselves. In order to encourage increased voter registration and revive organizational commitment to strong voter turnout, UPEC should consider sending letters to every member family, reminding them of UPEC s commitment to civic involvement and encouraging voter registration for members who are citizens but have not yet registered.

9 APPENDIX Historical Data 10 Registered Voter Turnout Graph 11 Difference in Voter Turnout Graph 12 Registered Voters vs. Actual Voters February 2008 Graph 13 Registered Voters vs. Actual Voters June 2008 Graph 14 Registered Voters vs. Actual Voters November 2008 Graph 15

10 HISTORICAL DATA: UPEC REGISTRATION - VOTING MEMBERS IN THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS 1,227 MEMBERS REGISTERED TO VOTE IN THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS 357 HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD 604 ALL FAMILY MEMBERS VOTING PERFORMANCE OF STANISLAUS RESIDENTS HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD AS PERCENT OF ALL COUNTY WIDE VOTING HISTORY REGISTERED MEMBERS AS PERCENT OF ALL ELIGIBLE TO VOTE REGISTERED VOTERS COMPARABLE STATISTICS VOTERS OCT 2003 87 73.7% 53.2% VOTERS MAR 2004 78 63.4% 38.4% VOTERS NOV 2004 117 91.4% 62.9% VOTERS NOV 2005 99 71.7% 44.4% VOTERS JUN 2006 68 48.6% 31.9% VOTERS NOV 2006 105 73.4% 50.9% VOTERS FEB 2008 239 66.9% 43.0% VOTERS JUN 2008 158 44.3% 22.0% VOTERS NOV 2008 305 85.4% 70.6% Note: Data for 2008 elections are based on registration from 2009

11 REGISTERED VOTER TURNOUT COMPARISON OF STANISLAUS COUNTY AND UNIAO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% UPEC 30% 20% STANISLAUS 10% 0% MAR02 NOV02 OCT03 MAR04 NOV04 NOV05 JUN06 NOV06 FEB08 JUN08 NOV08

12 DIFFERENCE IN VOTER TURNOUT BETWEEN UNIAO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA VOTERS AND STANISLAUS COUNTY VOTERS HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% MAR02 NOV02 OCT03 MAR04 NOV04 NOV05 JUN06 NOV06 FEB08 JUN08 NOV08

13 REGISTERED VOTERS VERSUS ACTUAL VOTERS FEBRUARY 2008 UNIÃO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 REGISTERED VOTERS 40 20 ACTUAL VOTERS 0 AGE<30 30<AGE<40 40<AGE<50 50<AGE<60 60<AGE<70 AGE>70

14 REGISTERED VOTERS VERSUS ACTUAL VOTERS JUNE 2008 UNIÃO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 REGISTERED VOTERS 40 20 ACTUAL VOTERS 0 AGE<30 30<AGE<40 40<AGE<50 50<AGE<60 60<AGE<70 AGE>70

15 REGISTERED VOTERS VERSUS ACTUAL VOTERS NOVEMBER 2008 UNIÃO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 REGISTERED VOTERS ACTUAL VOTERS 20 0 AGE<30 30<AGE<40 40<AGE<50 50<AGE<60 60<AGE<70 AGE>70