State Consumer and Protection Laws Enforcement and Litigation Trends in Texas. September 20, 2011

Similar documents
Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN

Senate Bill 487 Ordered by the House June 1 Including Senate Amendments dated April 25 and House Amendments dated June 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 7:16-cv NSR Document 17 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Courthouse News Service

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

D-1-GN PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

76th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3689

CONSUMER PROTECTION (FAIR TRADING) ACT

Case 4:17-cv Document 1-2 Filed in TXSD on 11/15/17 Page 2 of NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

Case 4:16-cv DMR Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 21

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session

CONSUMER LAW BASICS KNOW THE LAW! PRESENTED BY: THE CENTER FOR CONSUMER LAW HOUSTON, TEXAS FRIDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2009

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 703

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION OPINION AND ORDER

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

Advocacy, Practice & Procedure Committee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 68, PENSION FUNDS LAWYERS ASSOCIATION 07 March 2011

Case 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18

Case 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

LAWS OF SOUTHERN SUDAN

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, MISSOURI. Plaintiffs, Defendant. PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.

Superior Court of California

Filing # E-Filed 07/13/ :52:45 AM

LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-fourth Legislature First Regular Session 2017 IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. BY BUSINESS AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE

Case 5:16-cv NC Document 1 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 31 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

510 Introduction to Commercial Law

CONSUMER PROTECTION (FAIR TRADING) ORDER, 2011

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2661

Case 4:14-cv RAS Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

The Consumer Protection Act

Case 5:18-cv TLB Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 2014

CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

Trademark Laws: Pennsylvania

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

One to Keep a Close Eye On Bradford County Permits the Pennsylvania Attorney General to Proceed with Novel Claims against Two Oil and Gas Operators

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/19/18 Page 1 of 55 Page ID #:1

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

2016CI21911 CAUSE NO. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. COMES NOW GRUPO INTEGRADORA SOLAR, SAPI DE CV (hereinafter, GIS ),

2. Model Act Provisions The Idaho registration statute adopts the 1992 version of the Model Act. I.C

Filing # E-Filed 03/07/ :02:15 AM

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 03/09/16 Page 1 of 31 PageID #:97

Creative and Legal Communities

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

City of Stephenville Solicitation Guidelines for Citizens and Applicants

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CV IN RE DOROTHEA BAKER AND KEITH BAKER. Original Proceeding MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1. Code Section The registration of a trademark in Nevada is governed by Nevada Revised Statutes ( NRS ) et seq.

Case 8:16-cv JDW-JSS Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: Section 1. KRS is amended to read as follows:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. STATE OF ARKANSAS ex rel. DUSTIN McDANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL. v. Case No.

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1999 BERMUDA 1999 : 45 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1999

Senate Bill 5 Sponsored by Senator COURTNEY (Presession filed.)

Case 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint

Consumer Class Action Waivers Post-Concepcion

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

15 USC 80b-3. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

THE PUNJAB CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 2005 (Pb. Act II of 2005) C O N T E N T S

CAUSE NO CI STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff,

Chapter 6. Disparagement of Property 8/3/2017. Business Torts and Online Crimes and Torts. Slander of Title Slander of Quality (Trade Libel) Defenses

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:17-cv FDS Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Transcription:

State Consumer and Protection Laws Enforcement and Litigation Trends in Texas September 20, 2011

Panel Members Moderator Nicole Williams Thompson & Knight LLP Panelists David Bragg Law Offices of David F. Bragg & former Assistant Attorney General / Division Chief, Consumer Protection Division Esther Chavez - Assistant Attorney General / Deputy Chief, Consumer Protection Division Mark Kincaid - Kincaid & Horton, L.L.P.

DTPA - Overview Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA)--Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 17.41 et seq.--was enacted in 1973. The DTPA was designed to protect consumers against false, misleading, and deceptive business practices, unconscionable actions, and breaches of warranty and to provide efficient and economical procedures to secure that protection.

DTPA Standing Plaintiff can be any "consumer" under DTPA, which is any: (a) an individual, partnership, corporation, State of Texas, or Texas agency. (b) that either (i) sought to purchase or lease goods or services from defendant; or (ii) actually purchased or leased goods or services from defendant. The term "consumer" does not include a "business consumer" that has assets of $25 million or more, or that is owned or controlled by a corporation or entity with assets of $25 million or more. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 17.45(4)

DTPA Violations A consumer may maintain an action under the DTPA if the consumer has suffered economic damages or damages for mental anguish produced by any one of the following four types of actions: The use or employment of a false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice that is specifically enumerated in Business and Commerce Code Section 17.46(b) and relied on by the consumer to the consumer's detriment. The breach of an express or implied warranty. An unconscionable action or course of action. The use or employment of an act or practice in violation of Insurance Code Chapter 541.

DTPA Violations Prohibited practices are listed in Section 17.46(b), sometimes referred to as "laundry list" violations, and include: Passing off goods or services as those of another Causing confusion or misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods or services Causing confusion or misunderstanding as to affiliation, connection, or association with, or certification by, another Using deceptive representations or designations of geographic origin in connection with goods or services Representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities that they do not have, or that a person has a sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connection that the person does not have Representing that deteriorated, reconditioned, reclaimed, used, or secondhand goods are original or new Falsely representing that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality, or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model And more...

DTPA Tie-In Statutes Tie-in statutes are other statutes that provide that their violation, or a violation of some of their provisions, constitutes a deceptive trade practice. A person injured by a violation of the act or statute in question may bring suit either directly under that statute, under the DTPA, or under both. Examples of tie-in statutes include: Provisions regulating telephone solicitation, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 302.001, et seq. Cancellation of Consumer Transactions Act, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 601.001, et seq. Debt Collection Act, Tex. Fin. Code 392.001, et seq. Provisions governing sellers of real property, see Tex. Prop. Code 5.069(d),(e), 5.070(b),(c), 5.072(e),(f), 5.078(d),(e)

DTPA Damages Damages in a DTPA action include: Economic and mental anguish damages Injunction Court costs and attorney's fees Interest Treble damages for knowing violations Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 17.50(b)

Texas Insurance Code Ch. 541 and 542 Chapter 541 addresses unfair competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the insurance industry. Chapter 541 provides a cause of action for a person who has sustained actual damages caused by another's engaging in an act or practice that is either: (1) declared to be an unfair or deceptive practice under Tex. Ins. Code 541.051-541.061; or (2) specifically enumerated in the DTPA "laundry list" of violations as an unlawful deceptive trade practice. Persons who are victims of unfair or deceptive insurance practices may have a cause of action under the DTPA, under chapter 541 of the Insurance Code, or under both laws.

Consumer Privacy Laws Consumer Protection Against Computer Spyware Act Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 324.001 et seq. Anti-Phishing Act Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 325.001 et seq. Disposal of Business Records Containing Personal Identifying Information Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 72.004

Consumer Privacy Laws Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 521.001 et seq. Identity theft is a deceptive trade practice under the DTPA. Court Order to Declare Individual a Victim of Identity Theft Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 521.101 et seq. Identity Theft Insurance Tex. Ins. Code 706.001 et seq.

AG Civil Investigative Demand Whenever the consumer protection division believes that any person may be in possession, custody, or control of the original copy of any documentary material relevant to the subject matter of an investigation of a possible violation of this subchapter, an authorized agent of the division may execute in writing and serve on the person a civil investigative demand requiring the person to produce the documentary material and permit inspection and copying. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 17.61

Helpful Texas Links Texas Attorney General s Office Consumer Protection Unit https://www.oag.state.tx.us/consumer Texas Department of Insurance http://www.tdi.texas.gov/ Texas Statutes http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/