Case: 1:06-cv Document #: 961 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:18566

Similar documents
Case: 1:06-cv Document #: Filed: 11/18/10 Page 1 of 50 PageID #:13753

Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Will County Marconi, et al. v. City of Joliet, case number 10-MR-0165

Case: 1:06-cv Document #: Filed: 05/11/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:17034

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:96-cv TFH-GMH Document 4234 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 122 Filed: 10/24/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:590

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 64 Filed: 08/25/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:873

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS.

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 353 Filed: 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:4147

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 626 Filed: 04/25/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:23049

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

Filing # E-Filed 04/21/ :36:23 PM

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

Case: 1:07-cv Document #: 32 Filed: 05/21/08 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:90 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Barbara Allen v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC, now known as CIOX Technologies, LLC, Fla. 13 th Jud. Cir. Ct. Case No. 12-CA

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No.

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MACOUPIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS PLAINTIFF S SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 511 Filed: 07/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:11585

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 38 Filed: 01/13/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:167 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 7:16-cv O Document 85 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2792

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF REMOVAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:13-cv ALC-GWG Document 114 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:69-cv Document #: 3762 Filed: 05/15/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:23784

If Your Farm Produced or Pooled Grade A Milk In A Federal Milk Marketing Order During the Period January 2002 Through April 2007

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

CLASS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:08-cv Document #: 30 Filed: 03/24/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:107

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

Case 1:18-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 155 Filed: 12/17/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1288 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 5:14-cv JPB-JES Document Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 57 PageID #: 4967

Case 6:14-cv RWS-KNM Document 81-2 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID #: 994. Exhibit 2

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING

Case 3:12-cv CRB Document 284 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

If You Were Sent a Text Message from CITGO Petroleum Corporation, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

Case: 1:74-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 06/02/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:105

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 11/12/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:725

Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

If you received a call on your cell phone from NCO Financial Systems about a debt, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Daniel L. Alterman Arlene F. Boop. resolution. attorneys and. attorneys time. TRAUB. By: ARLENE F. BOOP. By: DORIS G.

Case 2:00-cv JF Document 257 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

A California Superior Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

If you were a borrower on a mortgage loan account held or serviced by Wells Fargo, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Your Legal Rights and Options as a Class Member In This Settlement Class:

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

If a response is filed, a hearing will be scheduled. Notification of the hearing date will be mailed to both parties.

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Case 1:02-cv RWZ Document 1365 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

ACCORD COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

This is the only way to receive a payment from the Settlement Fund. DO NOTHING

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

RECEIVER S MOTION TO ESTABLISH CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURE AND TO SET CLAIMS BAR DATE

United States District Court District Of New Hampshire

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Alec T. Sabina and Emma L. Sabina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. No. BCD-CV Business and Consumer Court for Cumberland County, Maine If you

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 499 Filed: 12/04/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:6117

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107

Transcription:

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:18566 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KIM YOUNG, RONALD JOHNSON, WILLIAM JONES, ALLEN GORMAN, GERRAD LAMOUR, LEE MERCADO, BRADLEY HYTREK, CARL GRAY, and MATTHEW LIPTAK, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. No. 06-CV-552 JUDGE KENNELLY COUNTY OF COOK and SHERIFF TOM DART in his capacity as Head of the Cook County Sheriff s Department, Defendants. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISTRIBUTE YOUNG INSURANCE FUNDS Plaintiffs hereby move for an order permitting class administrator Rust Consulting to distribute the remaining settlement funds in this case, minus a $100,000 holdback in the event that Class Members who cannot currently be located come forward with contact information. In support of this motion, Plaintiffs state as follows. 1. On September 22, 2017, the Court entered a Final Order approving the settlement of Cook County, et al. v. American International Group, et al., Case No. 12-L-2765 (Cir. Ct. Cook County, Ill.) ( Young Insurance ). 2. The Young Insurance settlement provided an additional $32.5 million common fund for the Class, in addition to the original settlement with Cook County. See, e.g., Dkt. 906 at 5.

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:18567 3. After deducting notice costs of approximately $500,000, Dkt. 906 at 5 n.3, and the Court-awarded one-third contingency fee, the Young Insurance settlement provided approximately $21,500,000 for the 64,836 Class Members who submitted timely, valid claims for payment from the original settlement with Cook County. 4. Rust Consulting made an initial distribution of the Young Insurance proceeds to Class Members in the amount of $18,953,305.74 in January 2018. To account for the fact that Rust was unable to locate some Class Members, it held back the remaining proceeds for a future distribution. The amount it held back would have been sufficient to satisfy all claims from any Class Members who surfaced after the January 2018 payments went out. See Dkt. 945 7; Dkt. 945-1 3-4 (Rust Consulting Declaration). 5. Since it sent the original checks in January 2018, some additional Class Members who could not previously be located have contacted Rust or Class Counsel with updated address information, and so a total of $19,028,170.08 in checks have now been sent to 63,288 Class Members. Ex. 1 (J. Stinehart Declaration) 5. 6. As of today, approximately 43,000 checks have been cashed, meaning that approximately 20,000 checks have not been cashed, either because the checks were returned with no forwarding address available, or because the checks were not returned but were simply not cashed. Ex. 1 5(a); id. 5(b)(i),(ii). 7. With the exception of approximately 200 checks that were recently reissued at the request of Class Members, the approximately 20,000 uncashed checks are now past the void dates listed on the checks. Ex. 1 5(b). 8. Rust Consulting submits that it has exhausted all reasonable efforts to locate the approximately 20,000 Class Members with uncashed checks. Ex. 1 8. 2

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:18568 9. Because Rust Consulting has exhausted all reasonable efforts to locate the remaining Class Members with uncashed checks, Class Counsel, in consultation with Rust, seeks leave to distribute the remaining funds to the approximately 43,000 Class Members who have cashed their first checks from the Young Insurance settlement. See Ex. 1 9. 10. To account for the possibility that some of the Class Members with uncashed checks will contact Rust or Class Counsel with updated address information, Class Counsel, in consultation with Rust, proposes to hold back $100,000 from the distribution. That money can then be used to satisfy claims of Class Members who may surface after the proposed distribution is made. 11. When Class Counsel originally sought approval of the Young Insurance settlement and proposed a two-distribution plan, it noted that one reason for making two distributions rather than distributing everything at once was the fact that there was an additional lawsuit that might provide compensation for the Class in this case. That case, County of Cook v. USI, Case No. 12-L-8066 (Cir. Ct. Cook County), resulted in a verdict for Plaintiff in the amount of $9,050,000 in March 2018. Ex. 2 (USI Judgment). Both sides in the USI case have filed posttrial motions, which remain pending, and it appears likely that there will be an appeal following the resolution of those motions. The ultimate amount and timing of any payment from that case is uncertain, and Class Counsel submits that it would no longer be in the Class s best interest to wait for the final resolution of the USI case to make the final distribution of the Young Insurance funds. 12. Waiting for the final resolution of the USI case increases the possibility that additional Class Members may lose contact with Class Counsel and Rust, which would mean they might not get the second distribution at all. In addition, costs of administration increase the 3

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:18569 longer that Rust holds the funds, including costs for responding to the substantial number of inquiries from Class Members (and non-class Members) regarding the timing of future distributions. Thus, Class Counsel submits that distributing the remaining Young Insurance funds now is in the best interest of Class Members. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs seek leave to have Rust Consulting distribute the remaining funds from the Young Insurance settlement, minus a $100,000 holdback, to Class Members who have cashed their first checks from that settlement. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Scott Rauscher Michael Kanovitz Jon Loevy Scott Rauscher LOEVY & LOEVY 311 N. Aberdeen St., Third Floor Chicago, IL 60607 (312) 243-5900 Class Counsel 4

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961-1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:18570 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KIM YOUNG, RONALD JOHNSON, WILLIAM JONES, ALLEN GORMAN, GERRAD LAMOUR, LEE MERCADO, BRADLEY HYTREK, CARL GRAY, and MATTHEW LIPTAK, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, COUNTY OF COOK and SHERIFF TOM DART in his capacity as Head of the Cook County Sheriff s Department, Defendants. No. 06-CV-552 JUDGE KENNELLY DECLARATION OF JASON M. STINEHART CONCERNING EFFORTS TO LOCATE CLASS MEMBERS I, Jason M. Stinehart, hereby declare as follows: 1. I am employed as a Program Manager by Rust Consulting, the Settlement Administrator in the above-entitled action. Our main office address is 625 Marquette Avenue, Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402. I am over twenty-one years of age and authorized to make this declaration on behalf of Rust Consulting and myself. 2. I am submitting this Declaration to discuss the efforts that have been made to locate Class Members and distribute their shares of the Young Insurance settlement. EFFORTS TO LOCATE CLASS MEMBERS 3. Rust Consulting carried out the Court-approved notice plan to inform Class Members about the Young Insurance settlement. As part of that process, on or about May 17, 2017, Rust Consulting extracted a list of those who submitted a valid claim form from Young I (the original Young settlement with Cook County) to provide notice to Class Members of the settlement in the Young Insurance case, as only those Class Members who submitted a timely, EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961-1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:18571 valid claim to the Young I settlement are eligible to participate in the Young Insurance settlement. 4. In compiling the Class List for mailing the Class Notice, Rust Consulting used the data it had from Young I, which entailed 64,838 records of claimants who submitted valid claims for the Young I settlement. In sending out the Class Notice, Rust Consulting used the mailing address of Young v Cook County II - 5614, P.O. Box 2599, Faribault, MN 55021-9599 in order to receive undeliverable Class Notices, Requests for Objection and Settlement Class Member correspondence. After sending out notice of the Young Insurance settlement, Rust received a total of 26,760 undeliverable notices without a forwarding address. Before sending out checks to Class Members, Rust employed the below-described tiered approach to locate as many Class Members as possible. Through that approach, described below, Rust identified addresses for all but 1,801 of the undeliverables: a. Rust first sent all 26,760 undeliverable notices without a forwarding address to Transunion for skip tracing. Transunion address traces are performed by running records through an automated batch process where last known name and address information will be used to find more current address information. Transunion provides additional locator services using an assortment of consumer footprint information. The Transunion skip tracing returned 15,538 successful updated addresses. b. Following the Transunion skip trace, the remaining undeliverables were sent to Experian for further skip tracing. Experian utilized its proprietary matching process to identify the individuals Rust was attempting to contact, and attempted to identify any more recent addresses that Experian has in its databases for these individuals. Experian s matching process utilizes information submitted by Rust; the class member s Name, SSN, and Address information, to find that individual in their systems. Any individuals with more recent addresses were delivered back to Rust. Experian s databases include identification and mailing data from a multitude EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961-1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:18572 of sources that they have access to internally. That skip tracing resulted in an addition, 1,047 address updates. c. In addition to the Transunion and Experian skip tracing, 6,968 class members contacted Rust Consulting directly with address updates, and 226 class members provided Loevy and Loevy with address updates, which Loevy and Loevy in turn provided to Rust. d. As an additional step, the Illinois Department of Corrections provided a list of all current inmates, as well as the last known address for inmates on parole. Rust Consulting checked those addresses against the Class List, which resulted in 302 additional updated addresses. e. Finally, for addresses that could not be located using any of the above steps, Rust Consulting conducted a final round of skip tracing through Clear Trace. Clear Trace combines real-time data with advanced skip tracing tools which looks at contact information, including new or moved information. Clear Trace skip tracing resulted in 878 successful address updates. FUND DISTRIBUTION 5. As of June 27, 2018, 63,288 checks have been mailed to class members, each in the amount of $300.66, for a total of $19,028,170.08. As of the most recent reconciliation: a. 42,899 checks have cashed, for a total of $12,898,013.34. b. 20,389 checks that were sent out have not been cashed. Those checks can be further broken out as follows: i. 13,703 checks were mailed out and not returned, and thus presumed to be delivered, have reached the void date listed on those checks, for a total of $4,119,943.98 in uncashed checks. ii. 6,478 checks have been returned as undeliverable, for a total of $1,947,675.48 in uncashed checks. EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961-1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:18573 iii. 208 Class Members have requested that Rust Consulting reissue their checks have been sent checks, but have not yet cashed those checks, for a total of $62,537.28 in outstanding checks with a July 29, 2018 void date. Because those 208 Class Members specifically requested these checks and provided an address to send the checks, Rust reasonably expects that these checks will be cashed. 6. As of June 27, 2018, in addition to the 63,288 checks which were sent, there were 1,548 Class Members who could not be located in the notice plan, and who did not contact Rust to provide an updated address. Those 1,548 Class Members were therefore not sent checks. 7. On April 30, 2018, in an effort to locate and learn about those who had a returned check, Rust sent, at the time, all 7,748 checks which were returned to the Social Security Administration database for a deceased search. 406 records were returned as deceased and no further action will be taken on these records. 8. Through the above-described measures, Rust Consulting submits that it has exhausted reasonable efforts to locate updated addresses for Class Members. 9. In consultation with Class Counsel, Rust recommends distributing nearly all of the remaining funds, including the amount of the uncashed checks that have reached their void dates, to the 42,899 Class Members who have cashed their initial checks from the Young Insurance settlement (plus the 208 Class Members who have contacted Rust with updated address information and requested new checks). Although this means that approximately 20,000 Class Members will not receive payment from the Young Insurance case, Rust submits that it does not have a reasonable method to find those Class Members. Nonetheless, given that there is one more round in distribution of funds, in consultation with Class Counsel, Rust recommends holding back $100,000 from the Young Insurance settlement to compensate additional Class Members who cannot currently be located but who might contact Rust or Class Counsel (for example, if they contact Class Counsel or Rust with an updated address). EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961-1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:18574 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 2 nd day of July, 2018, in Minneapolis, MN. Jason M. Stinehart EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:06-cv-00552 Document #: 961-2 Filed: 07/03/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:18575 EXHIBIT 2