E-FILED on 12/11/03 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Similar documents
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 44 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:04-cv JW Document 20 Filed 06/23/2004 Page 1 of 6 WECHSLER HARWOOD, LLP SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARY LOU BENNEK, Derivatively on ) Behalf of THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DATE FILED:21. Case 1:13-cv RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:17-cv YGR Document 19 Filed 04/26/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 16 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:08-cv LAK Document 78 Filed 01/09/2009 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF ALABAMA CIVIL DIVISION BIRMINGHAM DIFFERENTIAL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN ADOPTED 1990, REVISED 2008

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

Page 1 of 13. Case 1: 05-cv-003-LY Document 23 Filed 01/2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION OS CV-923

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:05-cv DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv ER

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv WB

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #1

Case GLT Doc 644 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 13:52:10 FILED Desc Main Document Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case Doc 635 Filed 10/13/15 Entered 10/13/15 13:45:41 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Docket Number: SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE 0:15-cv JRT Document 17 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

U.S. District Court Central District Of California (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04-cv PA-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Case No. 3:16-cv DRH Master Docket In Re: Just For Men Mass Tort Litigation

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv AJN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Proposed Rules for First Reading page 2. Rule 4.3 Withdrawal page 2. Rule 5.1 Prompt Completion page 5

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case4:09-cv CW Document69 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

JUL SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY FILED CASE NO. 295 IN RE ALLODERM LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Docket Number: 1468 WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. Thomas J. Stallings, Esquire Jack M. Stover, Esquire Charles I. Artz, Esquire CLOSED VS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:10 cv 00071

LOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION

U.S. District Court Northern District of Alabama (Southern) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:00-cv WMA

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

scc Doc 51 Filed 07/16/15 Entered 07/16/15 15:54:38 Main Document Pg 1 of 23

State of Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Case No. CIV M ORDER

14 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT DIVISION GENERAL CIVIL RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE, CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. It is, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, unless later modified by Order of this Court,

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv GBD

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri (LIVE) (St. Louis) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:11-cv AGF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

Case 3:16-md FLW-LHG Document 115 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1596 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MDL 2738

: : Upon the motion dated as of November 8, 2010 (the Motion ), 1 of Ambac Financial

Docket Number: 4010 PENN STATE CONSTRUCTION, J&D, LLC. John G. Milakovic, Esquire Charles O. Beckley, Esquire VS.

Honorable James J. Wechler v. San Juan River Adjudication. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Claims of Navajo Nation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Guidelines & Procedures Civil Div. 35

Consolidated Arbitration Rules

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. I

New York Athletic Club of the City of N.Y. v Florio 2013 NY Slip Op 31882(U) August 9, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge:

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:12-cv VMC-TGW

Case: CJP Doc #: 45 Filed: 01/26/17 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Policies and Procedures for Circuit Civil Division 35

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2011 Page 1 of 6

Rhode Island False Claims Act

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Phoenix Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:17-cv HRH

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (White Plains) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 7:12-cv ER

Case 1:18-cv JGK Document 26 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Guidelines & Procedures Civil Div. 37

Transcription:

E-FILED on //0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IN READ-RITE CORPORATION : SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All actions captioned below. JAMES ALTMAN, RAYMOND LIU, No. C-0-0 RMW ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF RELATED CASES, APPOINTMENT OF RAND SHARAF AND BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL [Re Docket No.,, ] No. C-0-00 RMW No. C-0-0 RMW BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC

RAND SHARAF, JASON SZPILZINGER, No. C-0-0 MJJ No. C-0-0 MJJ TOMMIITA SENGVILAY, TODD ARNOLDUSSEN, I. BACKGROUND No. C-0-0 SBA No. C-0-0 MJJ Plaintiffs Rand Sharaf and Bisser Dimitrov move to consolidate related cases, to be appointed as lead plaintiff, and for approval of the selection of lead counsel. Originally, Shoji and Chieko Takasugi filed a competing motion for appointment as lead plaintiff, but they subsequently withdrew their motion on BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC

Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed //0 Page of September, 0. Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to the motions of Sharaf and Dimitro The motions were submitted on the papers. The court grants the motions. II. ORDER. Motion to Consolidate Related Cases A. The following actions pending in the Norther District are, until further order of this court, consolidated for all purposes pursuant to Rule (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before the Honorable Ronald M. Whyte: Martin Steinberg Alan S. Lowe, et al., C-0-0 (RMW); James Altman Alan S. Lowe, et al., C-0-00 (RMW); Raymond Liu Alan S. Lowe, et al., C-0-0 (RMW), Rand Sharaf Alan S. Lowe, et al., C-0-0 (MJJ); Jason Szpilzinger Alan S. Lowe, et al., C-0-0 (MJJ); Tommiita Sengvilay Alan S. Lowe, et al., C-0-0 (SBA); and Todd Arnoldussen Alan S. Lowe, et al., C-0-0 (MJJ). B. These actions shall be referred to herein as the Consolidated Actions. This Order shall apply to the Consolidated Actions and to each case that is subsequently filed in this court or transferred to this court that relates to the same subject matter as in the Consolidated Actions: () The short caption of the Consolidated Actions shall be In re Read-Rite Corporation Securities Litigation. Any other action now pending or hereafter filed in this District as a class action on behalf of acquirers of Read-Rite Corporation securities between October 0, 0 and June, 0, inclusive, which arises out of the same facts as alleged in the Consolidated Actions, shall be consolidated for all purposes as soon as it is brought to the court s attention. () The terms of this Order shall not have the effect of making any person, firm, or corporation a party to any action in which he, she, or it has not been named, served or added as such, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. () A Master Docket and a Master File are hereby established for the Consolidated Actions under Master File No. 0 CV 0 (RMW). Entries in said Master Docket shall be applicable to these Consolidated Actions as more fully set forth below. Separate dockets shall also be maintained for each of these Consolidated Actions, and entries shall be made therein in accordance with the regular procedures of the Clerk of the court, except as modified by this Order. BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC

Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed //0 Page of () Every pleading filed in this proceeding, or in any separate action included herein shall bear the following caption: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ---------------------------------------------------------------x IN READ-RITE CORPORATION : SECURITIES LITIGATION : C-0-0 RMW ---------------------------------------------------------------x THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ---------------------------------------------------------------x () When a pleading is intended to be applicable to all actions to which this Order is applicable, the words All Actions shall appear immediately after the words This Document Relates To: in the caption set out above. When a pleading is intended to be applicable only to some, but not all, of such actions, the court s docket number for each individual action to which the paper is intended to be applicable and the last name of the plaintiff in such action shall appear immediately after the words This Document Relates To: in the caption described above. () When a pleading is filed and the caption shows that it is to be applicable to All Actions, the Clerk shall file such pleading in the Master File and note such filing in the Master Docket. No further copies need be filed or docket entries made. () When a pleading is filed and the caption shows that it is to be applicable to fewer than all of the Consolidated Actions, the Clerk need file such pleading only in the Master File but, nonetheless, shall note such filing in both the Master Docket and in the docket of each such action. () When a case that relates to the subject matter of the Consolidated Actions is hereafter filed in this court or transferred here from another court, the Clerk of the court shall: (a) place a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action; BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC

Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed //0 Page of (b) (c) mail a copy of the Order of assignment to counsel for plaintiffs and to counsel for defendants in the Consolidated Actions; mail to the attorneys for the plaintiff(s) and to any new defendant(s) in the newly filed or transferred action a copy of this Order; and (d) make an appropriate entry in the Master Docket. () The court requests the assistance of counsel in calling to the attention of the Clerk of this court the filing or transfer of any case that might properly be consolidated as a part of In re Read- Rite Corporation Securities Litigation. () Lead plaintiff shall serve upon defendants a single, consolidated, amended class action complaint (the Complaint ). The Complaint shall be served within sixty (0) days of the entry of an Order appointing lead plaintiff and lead counsel for plaintiffs and the class, or such other time as may be mutually agreed by the parties. The Complaint shall supersede all existing complaints in the actions. No defendant is required to answer, move, or otherwise respond to any of the initial complaints filed in the Action. Defendants shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint within forty-five () days after its service on them, or such other time as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties. In the event that defendants move to dismiss the Complaint, plaintiffs shall have forty-five () days or such other time as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties to oppose such motion and defendants shall have fifteen () days from the date of service of the opposition to reply. () This Order shall apply to each case subsequently filed in this court or transferred to this court, unless a party objecting to the consolidation of such case or to any other provision of this Order files, within ten () days after the date upon which a copy of this Order is mailed to counsel for such party, an application for relief from this Order or any provision herein and this court deems it appropriate to grant such application.. Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Lead Counsel A. Rand Sharaf and Bisser Dimitrov are appointed as lead plaintiffs for the putative class and any subsequently consolidated or related action to represent the interests of the putative class. BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC

Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed //0 Page of B. Lead plaintiffs selection of lead counsel for the putative class is hereby approved. The law firms of Wechsler Harwood LLP and Charles J. Piven, P.A. are appointed co-lead counsel pursuant to D(a)()(B)(v) of the Exchange Act. C. Co-Lead counsel shall have authority to speak for all plaintiffs and putative class members in all matters regarding the litigation including, but not limited to, pretrial proceedings, motion practice, trial, and settlement, and shall make all work assignments in such a manner as to facilitate the orderly and efficient prosecution of this litigation and to avoid duplicative or unproductive effort. Additionally, co-lead counsel shall have the following responsibilities: () to brief and argue motions and file opposing briefs in proceedings initiated by other parties; () to initiate and conduct discovery proceedings, including, but not limited to, the preparation of discovery materials and discussions or negotiations concerning discovery issues; () to direct and coordinate the examination of witnesses in depositions and on oral interrogatories; () to act as spokespersons at court conferences and hearings; () to delegate responsibilities for specific tasks to other counsel in a manner to assure that pretrial preparation for the plaintiffs is conducted effectively, efficiently, and economically; () to consult with and call meetings of plaintiffs counsel when they deem it appropriate; () to consult with and employ experts; () to negotiate with and enter into agreements with defendants counsel with respect to settlement and other matters; () to coordinate this action with any related state or Federal court proceeding that involves issues similar to those raised in this consolidated action in order to avoid unnecessary duplication, expense, and effort; () to conduct all pretrial, trial, and post-trial proceedings; and BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC

Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed //0 Page of () to perform such other duties as they deem necessary, or as may be expressly authorized by further order of the court. C. Co-Lead counsel shall be responsible for coordinating all activities and appearances on behalf of the putative class and for disseminating notices and orders of this court. D. No motion, application or request for discovery shall be served or filed, or other pretrial proceedings initiated, on behalf of lead plaintiff, except through co-lead counsel. E. All notices, proposed orders, pleadings, motions, discovery, and memoranda shall be served upon co-lead counsel by overnight mail service, telecopy, or hand delivery. F. Co-Lead counsel for the putative class shall be available and responsible for communications to and from the court. Co-Lead counsel shall be responsible for the creation and maintenance of a master service list of all parties and their respective counsel. G. Defendants counsel may rely upon all agreements made with co-lead counsel. H. During the pendency of this litigation, or until further order of this court, the parties shall take reasonable steps to preserve all documents within their possession, custody, or control, including computer-generated and stored information and materials such as computerized data and electronic mail, containing information that is relevant to or which may lead to the discovery of information relevant to the subject matter of the pending litigation. I. This Order shall apply to each case subsequently filed in this court or transferred to this court, unless a party objecting to the consolidation of such case or to any other provision of this Order files within ten () days after the date upon which a copy of this Order is mailed to counsel for such party, an application for relief from this Order or any provision herein and this court deems it appropriate to grant such application. DATED: //0 /s/ Ronald M. Whyte RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC

Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed //0 Page of Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff(s): William S. Lerach Robert S. Green billl@mwbhl.com rsg@classcounsel.com Marc S. Henzel mhenzel@aol.com Robert I. Harwood rharwood@whesq.com Charles J. Piven piven@pivenlaw.com Counsel for Defendant(s): Gregory L. Watts gwatts@wsgr.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: //0 /s/ BDC Chambers of Judge Whyte BISSER DIMITROV AS LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVAL OF SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL C-0-0 RMW BDC