ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Similar documents
ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. SIERRA CLUB; and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER AND HOLD CASES IN ABEYANCE

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

HARVARD LAW SCHOOL Environmental Law Program

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

BEFORE THE UNITED STATATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v.

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT LEON H. RIDEOUT; ANDREW LANGOIS; BRANDON D. ROSS. Plaintiff - Appellees

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 13, 2012 No and consolidated cases (COMPLEX)

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

NO CV. In the Court of Appeals. For the Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas. Austin, Texas JAMES BOONE

Case 2:11-cv FMO-SS Document 256 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:11349

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:15-cv IMK Document 8 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 137

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. CASE NO. 4:08-cv RH-WCS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. ULTRAMERCIAL, LLC and ULTRAMERCIAL, INC., and WILDTANGENT, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SEVENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FILING CHECKLIST

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case 2:13-cv Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE THE UNITED STATATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 19- In the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Transcription:

USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 1 of 6 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association, et al., Petitioners, v. No. 15-1056 (Consolidated with 15-1140) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES Respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) moves to extend the briefing schedule by 150 days, during which time EPA will propose administrative actions regarding the regulation at issue in these consolidated cases. Petitioner Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association ( HPBA ) (No. 15-1056) and Petitioner Pellet Fuels Institute ( PFI ) (No. 15-1140) support this motion. Respondent-Intervenors American Lung Association, Clean Air Council, and Environmental and Human Health, Inc. do not oppose this motion. In support of this motion, EPA states as follows: 1. Petitioners challenge various aspects of EPA s final rule entitled Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential (Page 1 of Total) 1

USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 2 of 6 Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces. 80 Fed. Reg. 13,672 (Mar. 16, 2015) (the Rule ) 2. Petitioners have discussed the issues that they are likely to raise in litigation with EPA, and the Court granted multiple unopposed extensions of the briefing schedule to permit time for the parties to engage in these discussions. Under the current briefing schedule, Petitioners Brief(s) are due April 23, 2018; Respondent s Brief is due July 24, 2018; Intervenors Brief is due August 20, 2018; Petitioners Reply Brief(s) are due September 10, 2018; the Deferred Appendix is due September 17, 2018; and Final Briefs are due September 24, 2018. 3. EPA has now determined that certain issues concerning the Rule warrant an opportunity for public comment, which may lead to revisions of the Rule. See Ex. 1, Declaration of Peter Tsirigotis, 3. 4. EPA intends to issue a series of Federal Register notices concerning the Rule. Id. 4. Specifically, EPA expects to issue the first proposed rule regarding issues raised by the existing Rule this spring, and EPA intends to take final action on this first proposed rule by this fall. Id. Concurrently with or shortly after the first proposed rule, EPA expects to issue an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking to take comment on additional issues. Id. EPA intends to develop a second proposed rule, based in part of comments received on the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking. Id. EPA intends 2 (Page 2 of Total)

USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 3 of 6 to issue this second proposed rule this fall and to take final action on the second proposed rule by spring 2019. Id. 5. It is possible that EPA s anticipated proposed rules will result in final actions on the Rule that may affect the issues in this litigation. 6. EPA therefore requests a 150-day extension of the briefing schedule to allow the Agency time to issue the proposed rules. 7. EPA does not anticipate that any party would be prejudiced by the requested extension, which is supported by Petitioners, and is not opposed by Respondent-Intervenors. No merits briefs have been filed, and oral argument is not yet scheduled. For the foregoing reasons, EPA respectfully requests that the Court grant this motion to extend the briefing schedule by 150 days and enter the following briefing schedule: Petitioners Brief(s) September 20, 2018 Respondent s Brief December 21, 2018 Respondent-Intervenors Brief January 17, 2019 Petitioners Reply Brief February 7, 2019 Deferred Appendix February 14, 2019 Final Briefs February 21, 2019 (Page 3 of Total) 3

USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 4 of 6 Dated: April 16, 2018 Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General /s/ Simi Bhat SIMI BHAT U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 (202) 532-5563 (202) 514-8865 (fax) simi.bhat@usdoj.gov Counsel for Respondent EPA (Page 4 of Total) 4

USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMIT, TYPEFACE REQUIREMENTS, AND TYPE-STYLE REQUIREMENTS I hereby certify that this motion complies with the type-volume limitation of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2) because it contains 739 words, excluding the parts of the brief exempted under Rule 27(a)(2)(B), according to the count of Microsoft Word. I further certify that this motion complies with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5) and (6) because it has been prepared in Microsoft Word using 14- point Garamond, a proportionally spaced font. /s/ Simi Bhat Simi Bhat Counsel for Respondent EPA Dated: December 16, 2016 (Page 5 of Total) 5

USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing document using the Electronic Case Filing ( ECF ) system of this Court. The ECF system will send a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys of record. /s/ Simi Bhat Simi Bhat Counsel for Respondent EPA Dated: April 16, 2018 (Page 6 of Total) 6

USCA Case #15-1056 (Page 7 of Total) Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 1 of 2

USCA Case #15-1056 (Page 8 of Total) Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 2 of 2