December 2016 Voluntary Removal from the Register in Fitness to Practice proceedings.

Similar documents
Guidance on Undertakings

Fitness to Practise Committee 21 October Practice Note: Misuse of the HPC Collective Mark

Undertakings at Medical Practitioners Tribunal hearings

RULES PARAMEDIC ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRUNSWICK

Non-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO

Introduction. Guidance on Warnings July 2017 Page 1 of 6

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 16/10/ /10/2017

Part(s) of the register: Registered Nurse Sub Part 1. Eileen Skinner (Chair Lay member) Colin Kennedy (Lay member) Catherine Gale (Registrant member)

COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. - and - TANIA SCOTT REGISTRATION NO. JE06287 NOTICE OF HEARING

Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance

3.2 The Code to maintain patient safety and public confidence in the profession.

HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE

INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT

NRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE

GENERAL BY LAW. Code of Ethics means the CCSA code of ethics for Members and Students that forms part of the Rules of Professional Conduct;

Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance

Health and Character Declarations Policy

Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE. Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired

Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 15/08/ /08/2018. GMC reference number:

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 23 December 2015 at 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ

4. This guidance is a public document and is available from the GOC s website at:

SOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION

Re: Dr Jonathan Richard Ashton v GMC [2013] EWHC 943 Admin

Nursing and Midwifery Council:


Universities Psychotherapy and Counselling Association. Fitness to Practise Procedures

HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004

PRACTISING RULES COSTS LAWYERS. Regulator: Costs Lawyer Standards Board. Effective date: 9 April 2014

Background. 1 P age. 1. Remove the existing Provisional Class of membership, which is no longer consistent with the College s assessment processes.

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Investigating Committee. Fraudulent/Incorrect Entry. 25 September 2018

Northern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO

Indicative Sanctions Guidance Note

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Monday 17 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BAPU, Raisha Registration No: PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and immediate suspension

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION LADBROKES CORAL GROUP PLC

Equality Impact Assessment. Section One: General Information:

Health and Social Work Professions Order 2001

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting

Declarations guidance for fullyqualified

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004

Declarations guidance for student registrants

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Important changes to NHS Jobs application forms

Guidance on the RIBA Code of Practice for Chartered Practices - complaint procedures.

Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for informants

Regulations for Disclosure and Barring Service Screening

Guide to sanctioning

HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION/ ASSOCIATION DES PROFESSIONNELS EN RESSOURCES HUMAINES

Consolidated Practice Committee Rules

Health and Social Work Professions Order 2001

CONSOLIDATED PRACTICE COMMITTEE RULES

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and - ALLEN PHILLIP DENYS

This case was reviewed on the papers, with the agreement of both parties, by a Legally Qualified Chair.

A guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018

DETERMINATION ON THE FACTS AND IMPAIRMENT - 25/10/2017

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing

Administrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines

Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee

Delegated powers policy

In accordance with Rule 41 of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004 the hearing was held in public.

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Guidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions

HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*

Fitness to Practise Rule 6E Guidance for informants

Council meeting 15 September 2011

If this declaration is more than three months old, we will ask you to complete a new one before we grant your application.

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Date: 03/12/2018. GMC reference number: Review - Misconduct

Allegation and Findings of Fact That being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):

Regulations for the consideration of criminal convictions for students on courses leading to professional registration

The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU. Severe Reprimand and costs to ACCA in the sum of

assist do not programme; is also Determination GSCC means [1]

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal

Joining and leaving chambers, and internal disputes: obligations on chambers and barristers

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 87. (Chapter 11 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2017)

Universiteto. That being registered under the Medical Act 1983, as amended:

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Guidance on the Registrar s Rule 9 power of review (July 2017)

General Regulations Updated October 2016

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Chiropractors Act 1994

The position you have applied for is exempt from the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (as amended in England and Wales).

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and - MARTIN JUGENBURG

LOBBYING PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

1.5 Can the GPhC contact your employer to obtain information about the matters disclosed below?

The Bar Training Regulations ANNEX A

Consultation. Complaints Regulations: Amendment to the Professional Conduct Committee s power to take no further action

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

October Guideline to Disciplinary Committee for Determining Disciplinary Orders

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and -

BOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent.

Transcription:

December 2016 Voluntary Removal from the Register in Fitness to Practice proceedings. Introduction 1. This guidance sets out the relevant criteria and factors to consider in making decisions on applications for voluntary removal from UKBHC registered chaplains who are subject to a fitness to practice allegation. 2. A registrant may submit an application for voluntary removal from the register at any point in the fitness to practice process. 3. Voluntary removal however cannot be permitted when the registrant is the subject of a suspension or conditions of practice order. Such orders would first of all need to be revoked by the relevant committee before voluntary removal can be granted. Background 4. The primary purpose for voluntary removal is to allow those chaplains who admit that their fitness to practice is impaired and who do not intend to continue practising to be removed from the register without the need for a hearing and where the public will be best protected by their immediate removal from the register. 5. It will not generally be appropriate for voluntary removal to be allowed until a full investigation into the allegation has been completed and

the extent of the alleged impairment ascertained. This will usually follow the completion of an investigation by the employer and/or faith community or belief group. If the application is made at an early stage in the investigation process the registrant may be invited to resubmit their application at a later stage when the investigation has been completed and the case considered by the Screening Committee. 6. At whatever stage an application is received, it should not be granted unless the Screening Committee is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so. Reaching a decision about voluntary removal 7. In reaching a decision the Screening Committee must have regard to: 7.1 The public interest. 7.2 The interests of the chaplain. 7.3 Any comments from those who have carried out the investigation. 8. It must be borne in mind that voluntary removal is not necessarily permanent. Any application for readmission following voluntary removal would not be granted automatically. Such an application would be referred to the Registrar to consider and any unresolved fitness to practice issues would be taken into consideration. 9. Where there are outstanding fitness to practice concerns voluntary removal is allowed on the basis that removal of the registrant will ensure that patients are protected. 10. The genuineness or sincerity of a registrant s desire to remove themselves from the register is a significant factor for consideration in deciding whether or not it may be appropriate to allow an application for voluntary removal.

11. In assessing the genuineness of the registrant s desire to remove themselves from the register, one of the factors will be whether they are at an early or late stage in their career. Where a registrant can provide evidence to support their intention to permanently retire from chaplaincy this may be seen as a strong indicator that they are unlikely to seek readmission in the future. 12. Registrants in the early stages of their career may demonstrate genuine insight and express their intention to pursue an alternative career path and may be able to give robust evidence of that intention. 13. It is also in the public interest to consider any plans that the registrant may have to pursue work in another health or social care profession. In such circumstances the Registrar should consider the impact on public confidence. 14. If an application for voluntary removal is accepted the registrant s employer and faith community and/or belief group will be informed. Readmission to the Register. 15. Any application for readmission following voluntary removal would not be granted automatically. Such an application will be referred to the Registrar to consider and any unresolved fitness to practice issues will be taken into consideration. 16. In health care cases readmission will not be allowed unless the registrant is able to satisfy the Registrar by means of up to date independent medical evidence that they are now of good health and capable of safe and effective practice.

Applying voluntary removal to particular cases. 17. In reaching a decision on voluntary removal, all aspects of the case and all of the factors outlined above that are relevant should be considered. Health Cases. 18. In situations where the allegations and evidence relate to a registrant s long-term mental or physical health and there are no outstanding conduct issues to consider it will generally be appropriate for an application for voluntary removal to be granted as long as the decision is in the public interest. 19. If the registrant shows insight into their health condition and accepts that their fitness to practice is impaired, the public interest may be better served by allowing the registrant to remove themselves from the register as soon as possible. 20. In such circumstances the voluntary removal on health grounds, although not the details of any medical condition would be recorded and may be disclosed to relevant enquirers including potential employers. Lack of competence cases. 21. Voluntary removal may also be appropriate where the allegation relates to lack of competence and the registrant accepts that their fitness to practice is impaired, has already ceased practising and has no intention of returning to chaplaincy.

22. In such circumstances the voluntary removal will be flagged on the register and disclosed to relevant enquirers. Misconduct cases. 23. If the allegations are primarily about misconduct, or relate to a conviction or determination concerning the registrant s conduct, there are more likely to be arguments in favour of refusing the application for voluntary removal and allowing the case to proceed to a full panel adjudication. This is particularly likely in cases where the allegations are of a serious nature and where a striking off order may be an appropriate sanction. 24. In relation to less serious misconduct and conviction cases it is only ever likely to be appropriate to grant an application to grant an application to grant an application for voluntary removal when: - the allegations, if proved, would not be of sufficient seriousness to warrant a striking off order, and - the allegations of impairment have been admitted or proved. Summary. 25. All the factors set out above will have to be considered by the Registrar in reaching a decision including consideration of issues of public protection and public confidence. (Guidance revised: September 2014)