Geoffrey Robertson QC

Similar documents
Kate O Raghallaigh. Year of Call: Kate specialises in crime, extradition and crime related public law.

Manjit S Gill QC Public Law

OBSTACLES TO FREE SPEECH AND THE SAFETY OF JOURNALISTS. Friday 3 May Speakers Bios

LAW SHEET No.5 THE DISCRETION OF THE CORONER

Martin Westgate QC. Call: 1985 Silk:

!! # % & #! %()) ) +,)

Before : LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES

Before : LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES. Practice Direction (Costs in Criminal Proceedings) 2015

English Law and Terminology. JUSTINE K. COLLINS

Business Crime & Financial Services

SEVEN BEDFORD ROW BARRISTERS CHAMBERS

Before : DAVID CASEMENT QC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) Between :

David Malone. Call: 1998 Phone:

Raj holds a first class undergraduate law degree and postgraduate law degree from Oxford University. Before joining the Bar, Raj qualified as a

Tim Nesbitt QC. Barrister Profiles. New York. London. Abu Dhabi. Manchester. Dubai. Outer Temple Chambers The Outer Temple 222 Strand London WC2R 1BA

Chair of European Law, Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London (since 2013).

HERE S WHAT THEY SAY

HERE S WHAT THEY SAY

Absolutely superb. Kate Grange QC. Practice Areas. Chambers & Partners Year called 1998 Silk 2017

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 11 of 2009

Before : Between :

CASE SUMMARY by Alliff Benjamin Suhaimi

Laura frequently acts for NGOs and both legally aided and high net worth individuals.

LAW SHEET No.1 UNLAWFUL KILLING 1

Coroners and Justice Bill

Dafydd Enoch QC. DX: Leeds Park Square T: +44 (0) E: F: +44 (0)

THE ANTHONY GRAINGER INQUIRY FAMILY S NOTE ON THE LAW ON THE TEST FOR SELF-DEFENCE

GUIDANCE No.25 CORONERS AND THE MEDIA

What is required to satisfy the investigative obligation under Article 2 and/or 3 ECHR? JENNI RICHARDS

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

JUDGMENT. R v Sally Lane and John Letts (AB and CD) (Appellants)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SANJEEV RAMGARIB AND HER WORSHIP MAGISTRATE REHANNA HOSEIN

RT HON SIR ALAN DUNCAN MP

Before : LORD JUSTICE BEAN MRS JUSTICE CARR Between :

Robert specialises in crime, professional discipline, regulatory law, inquests, extradition and sports law.

He has been asked to chair meeting between multinationals and NGO s both overseas and in the United Kingdom.

JUDGMENT. Terrell Neilly v The Queen

Briefing for the Liberal Democrat Policy Review on Asylum, Immigration and Identity

Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS. The trial...3 Hierarchy of the courts...5 Dressing...4 Timeline...4/5

Before: THE QUEEN, ON THE APPLICATIONS OF

Before the Honourable Mr Justice Myers (Acting) Dr Charles Seepersad and Mr Mark Seepersad instructed by Mr Gerald Ramdeen for the Applicant

James Eadie QC He is in a different league an outstanding advocate who deals with the most mind-blowing workload very effectively.

8 Case Digest In Detail G v UK (App. No /08) 9 Gale v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2011] UKSC 49 Her Majesty s Advocate v P [2011] UKSC 44

Nicholas de la Poer. DX: Leeds Park Square T: +44 (0) E: F: +44 (0)

IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CHAPTER 2 OF THE LAWS OF SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES REVISED EDITION 1990.

ARDL CONTENTS QUARTERLY BULLETIN JUNE 2004 PAGE 1 CHRISTOPHER ALDER PAGE 2 PAGE 5 HOW LONG IS TOO LONG?

See Rantsev v Cyprus and Russia, (Application no /04), European Court of Human Rights.

Clements: Q&A Public Law. Chapter 7: The Human Rights Act 1998

Proportionality and Legitimate Expectation Jonathan Moffett. Introduction

PRESS SUMMARY. On appeal from R (Conway) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 2447 (Admin)

The Rights of the Defence According to the ECtHR and CJEU

THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM

Deportation and Human Rights

Before : THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES LORD JUSTICE GROSS and MR JUSTICE MITTING Between :

WILLIAMS, K. Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at:

Roger Birch. Overview +44 (0)

JUDGMENT. In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)

Isabel Buchanan EXPERIENCE. Civil Liberties & Human Rights. Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ST. CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PRISONS

Before : THE HON MR JUSTICE OUSELEY Between :

Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Bill [HL]

PRESS SUMMARY. A, K and M were the subject of asset freezes under the TO. The effect on them and their families has been severe.

Additional Material for Chapter 12: Court reporting other restrictions Indefinite anonymity for convicted defendants and others

Counter-Terrorism Bill

5 Essex Court s barristers are at the cutting edge of everything

A go-to silk for clients with a difficult case on their hands. Extremely thorough, quick and entirely reliable.

Before : HIS HONOUR JUDGE RICHARD PARKES QC (Sitting as a Judge of the High Court) Between :

Request for information held by Ministry of Justice relating to investigation by Hon Ian Binnie QC into David Bain s compensation claim

Coroners and Problems Around Disclosure of Documents

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF And

THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ST. CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS JUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL,

EXPLAINING THE COURTS AN INFORMATION BOOKLET

Collins, J., & Ashworth, A. (2016). Householders, Self-Defence and the Right to Life. Law Quarterly Review, 132,

JUDGMENT. BA (Nigeria) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) and others

Draft Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2007

He s an exceptional performer he s very experienced, very reliable and a very persuasive advocate. He always delivers the goods.

OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE

Before: LORD JUSTICE HOLROYDE MRS JUSTICE ANDREWS DBE. - and - J U D G M E N T

Before : LORD JUSTICE THORPE LORD JUSTICE RIX and LORD JUSTICE STANLEY BURNTON Between :

James McCrindell 1993

THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CRIMINAL) -AND-

v HMA) 3. The grounds on which a plea of guilty may be withdrawn fall to be Pleas of Guilty Introduction

Current/Recent House of Lords Cases

B e f o r e: PRESIDENT OF THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT. Between:

Sentencing law in England and Wales Legislation currently in force. Part 5 Post-sentencing matters

JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES. Judge Howard Riddle, Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate) In the Westminster Magistrates Court.

Richard Atkins QC Barrister Called 1989 Silk 2011

JUDGMENT. R (on the application of Sturnham) (Appellant) v The Parole Board of England and Wales and another (Respondents) (No. 2)

JUDGMENT. Earlin White v The Queen

JUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL, Delivered the 22nd May 2003

James McCrindell 1993

Good afternoon. It is a great pleasure to be able to address you on how we in the United Kingdom involve citizens in the criminal process.

City, University of London Institutional Repository. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version.

OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

Submitted by: Robinson LaVende [represented by Interights, London]

Chapter 10: Indictments

RESPONSE by FACULTY OF ADVOCATES To Pre-Recording evidence of Child and Other Vulnerable Witnesses

A Coroner s perspective on a conclusion of suicide. Michael Singleton HM Senior Coroner Blackburn, Hyndburn & Ribble Valley

Briefing on landmark developments under the Human Rights Act

LAW REPORTS. This document explains how to access law reports

Transcription:

Geoffrey Robertson QC Call: 1973 Silk: 1988 Email: g.robertson@doughtystreet.co.uk Profile He has had a distinguished career as a trial and appellate counsel, an international judge, and author of leading textbooks. He has argued many landmark cases in media, constitutional and criminal law, in the European Court of Justice; the European Court of Human Rights; the Supreme Court (House of Lords and Privy Council); the UN War Crimes courts; the World Bank s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and in the highest courts of many commonwealth countries. Geoffrey has, as a jury advocate, appeared in many criminal trials at the Old Bailey and libel trials in the High Court. He has appeared in several hundred reported cases in the Court of Appeal (both civil and criminal divisions) and in judicial reviews in the High Court, and in subsequent appeals. He has a large advisory practice, for clients including governments, media corporations, NGO s and local councils. Education BA LLB (Hons) Sydney

BCL (Oxon) Rhodes Scholar Honorary Degrees (Doctor of Laws) from Sydney, Brunel and Bucharest Universities. Visiting Professor at Queen Mary College and the New College of the Humanities. Related practice areas International Law & Arbitration Extradition Media, Defamation and Freedom of Expression International Criminal Law International Arbitration International Human Rights Law Public International Law Homicide and Related Grave Offences Geoffrey has defended in many trials of murder and other serious offences, and a number of associated appeals. He defended in R v Wang Yam, a three month Old Bailey trial in 2010 which frequently had to go into camera, but could not appear at the retrial in which the defendant was convicted. He appeared on appeal see R v Wang Yam [2010] EWCA Crim 2072. Amongst his groundbreaking criminal appeal cases are R v Ahluwalia, which established the right of beaten women to plead diminished responsibility for killing their assailant partners as a result of traumatic stress disorders (this case was the subject of several books and a movie). He argued the landmark case of Pratt & Morgan v AG of Jamaica [1994] 2 AC1 in which the Privy Council ruled that the death sentence could not be carried out on men who had served several years on death row: as a consequence of this case, hundreds of convicts facing execution in the Caribbean have had their death sentences commuted. Terrorism Geoffrey appeared in the past in many high profile terrorist cases involving IRA suspects: the Brighton bombing (his client was the only defendant to be acquitted); and he successfully defended the IRA bomb-maker Dessie Ellis, the first Irish national to be extradited to the UK. He also defended in the persons unknown anarchist case (R v Ronan Bennett and ors) and successfully appealed the conviction in the Winchester 3 case (R v McCann & ors, 92 Cr

AppR239). He argued the leading case of R v Al Bashir Mohammed Al Faqih [2007] in which the Court of Appeal determined the definition of Terrorism under the Terrorism Act 2000. Criminal Appeals Geoffrey has handled an array of appeals in criminal matters from the most serious see Pratt, above, and many other successful murder appeals in the Privy Council, such as R v Reid & Dennis[1990] AC 363 (seven convictions quashed through misdirection of eyewitness evidence) to the recent case of R v Mears [2011] EWCA Crim 2651. There, the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction of the man who over-promoted Lapland because a juror had been communicating via mobile telephone with her boyfriend in the public gallery. He has appeared in a number of reference back cases in the Court of Appeal on behalf of the Criminal Cases Review Commission, most recently (and successfully)r v Allen Stevens [2010] EWCA Crim 2630. He has also dealt with national security issues in the House of Lords see R v Shayler [2002] UKHL II and issues such as the right of journalists to protect their sources of information Goodwin v UK, [1996] 22 EHRR 123, a case which he won in the European Court after losing in every court below. Mr. Robertson has conducted many appeals involving important points of criminal law e.g. R v Elizabeth Forsythe [1997] 2 Criminal Appeal reports 299, where he had the conviction of Asil Nadir s assistant quashed, R v Felixstowe Justices ex p David Leigh[1994] 2 AC1, which established the right of the press to know details of Justices trying criminal cases. International Crime Geoffrey Robertson served as a UN appeal judge, as President of the War Crimes Court in Sierra Leone (which indicted Charles Taylor), from 2002-2007, and delivered a number of groundbreaking judgments, e.g. on the illegality of recruiting child soldiers and the limits of amnesty. His book on international criminal law Crimes Against Humanity is now in its fourth edition. He has appeared at the ICTY in the leading case of ex parte Jonathan Randall and the Washington Post, successfully establishing a testamentary privilege for war correspondents. He has a wide advisory practice in respect of war crimes and in 2008 was appointed by the UN to its Justice Council as a distinguished jurist member.

Inquests and Inquiries Geoffrey has appeared as counsel in some of the most publicised inquests of recent times, including that of Helen Smith (which inspired two books, one by Paul Foot), R v West Yorkshire Coroner, ex parte Smith (No 2), [1985] Q.B.1096. He appeared in the first friendly fire inquest,oxford Coroner s Court, 18th May 1992, on behalf of the families of nine British soldiers killed by American pilots in the first Gulf War. He also appeared for the family of Cynthia Jarrett, (Tottenham Coroner s Court, November 1985), in the inquest into the police raid which started the Broadwater Farm riots. Geoffrey's writing, both in newspaper articles and in his book "Freedom, the Individual and The Law" has contributed to recent changes in coronial procedures. National Security Geoffrey has argued the most important case on national security in recent times at first instance, court of appeal and House of Lords, namely R v Shayler [2002] UKHL 11. He was counsel for the main defendant, Duncan Campbell in the legendary "ABC" case (R v Aubrey, Berry and Campbell, 1978, unreported) which first led to the revelation of the existence of GCHQ. More recently, he was counsel for the New York Times and other international media in the important case of Binyan Mohamed,[2010] EWCA Civ 65, in the Divisional Court and Court of Appeal: he produced the evidence from the US that undermined the government's position. The appeal of Wang Yam, [2010] EWCA Crim 2072, which has a significant national security dimension, is in the Strasbourg court at present. Extradition Geoffrey is frequently consulted on cases of extradition. He has been engaged in recent years on behalf of Mr. Galbaransingh in Trinidad in a long-running case in which extradition has now finally been refused (there are extensive judgments at first instance and in the Court of Appeal),- Galbarasingh v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago, TT 2007 CA 44. He represented Julian Assange in the extradition proceedings before the District Court judge, [2010] EWHC 3473 (Admin), and has written about and provided legal opinions for the press on the attempted extradition of Gary Mackinnon.

Immigration - Asylum and Personal Geoffrey acted for the Human Rights and Equality Commission in the very important case of Najibullah Saeedi v The Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2010] EWCA Civ 990, both in the Court of Appeal and in the European Court of Justice. This was the first case in which the court had interpreted the "right to dignity" in Article 1 of the Lisbon Treaty. The result changed the interpretation of the Dublin Convention and gave greater protection to immigrants and asylum seekers. Geoffrey has also acted in a series of important immigration cases in the High Court and Court of Appeal: see Vasquez v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal [2010] EWCA Civ 491 and MW (DRC) v Secretary of State [2011] EWCA Civ 1240 - the latter an important Court of Appeal decision on the approach to "settled immigrants". Media Law and Defamation Geoffrey has been at the forefront of media law and practice over the past thirty years and is the author of "Robertson & Nicol on Media Law (written with Sir Andrew Nicol, now a High Court judge. He has been counsel in many landmark media law cases such as Jameel v Wall Street Journal (Europe),[2006] UKHL 44, where the House of Lords quashed an adverse jury verdict and developed a public interest defence for the media in defamation cases. Geoffrey acted for The Times, The Guardian and The Economist in the first media case heard by the Supreme Court, AKMQG v Her Majesty s Treasury,[2010] UKSC1, the Alphabet Soup decision where the court deprecated the use of acronyms to anonymise parties to litigation. He also acted in the High Court and Court of Appeal in a case brought to argue for public access to Royal wills: in the matter of The Estate of HM Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother v Robert Andrew Brown [2007] UKHC 1607 (Fam). He conducted the defence of the New York Times in Mardas v New York Times (settled) [2008] EWHC 3135 (QB) and is currently appearing in two major libel actions, for Alexander Lebedev (proprietor of The Independent in Polonsky v Lebedev and for the Magnitsky campaigners in Karpov v Bill Browder and Hermitage. He has an extensive advisory practice and is called upon to provide advice to many newspapers, broadcasters and media corporations.