ASSAULT DIAGRAM ASSAULT SUMMARY

Similar documents
CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY Define relevant abbreviations at top: o o Crimes Act = Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) o D = accused, V = victim

OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON

Alternative Measures for Adult Offenders ALT 1. March 1, 2018 CHA 1 CHI 1 CRI 1 FIR 1 HAT 1 IPV 1 SEX 1

Multi-Agency Guidance (Non Police)

PENNSYLVANIA TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

PART V LAWS OF ASSAULT

STALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

STALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

TORTS EXAM NOTES 1. TRESPASS: a. FALSE IMPRISONMENT. b. TRESPASS TO LAND. c. DEFENCES (TRESPASS) d. DAMAGES (TRESPASS) 2. NEGLIGENCE. a.

MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL LAW DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL CASSIDY BOSTON COLLEGE LAW SCHOOL

INSTRUCTIONS FOR VACATING MISDEMEANOR AND GROSS MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS

CRIMINAL LAW DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ANTHONY M. DILLOF WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL

CARL Backgrounder on the New Citizenship Act (formerly Bill C-24) INTRODUCTION

MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ISAAC BORENSTEIN SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL

Homicide and Involuntary Manslaughter

Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) Frequently Asked Questions December 4, 2014

Adjourning Licensing Hearings

MARYLAND TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL PAPPAS UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW

Article I: Legislative Branch; Powers of Congress, Powers denied Congress, how Congress functions

INTEGRITY COMMISSION BILL

Dual Court System Chapter 3

CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW

Role Play Magistrate Court Hearings Teacher information

The Genuine Temporary Entrant (GTE) Requirement (Recommendations 1 and 2)

Murder and Involuntary Manslaughter

National Criminal History Record Check (NCHRC) Application Consent to Obtain Personal Information - December 2011

CBA Response to Private Prosecuting Association Consultation entitled. Private Prosecutions Consultation. 6 th March 2019

AGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW

Criminal Procedure and Evidence. By Zohra Arbabzada

FOR RESTRICTED AOs DIPLOMA IN POLICING ASSESSMENT UNITS Banked

Printed copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy in Scouts.ca for the latest version.

TORTS PROFESSOR SHERMAN CLARK UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL

DATA REQUEST GUIDELINES

45-47 Part 1: General & Specified Prohibited Conduct Lecture 11: Consumer Protection Law

SIMPLIFYING SOCIAL MEDIA Learning From Our Youth.

If at all possible, it is strongly recommended that you get advice from a lawyer to help you with this application.

Supervised Legal Practice Guidelines (Legal Profession Act 2008)

Opinions on Choice of Law, Forum Selection, Arbitration, and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments or Arbitral Awards in Cross-Border Transactions

Causation and Remoteness of Damage/Scope of Liability

Criminal Law. Prof. Totten Spring 2018

MICHIGAN CONTRACTS & SALES DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ANNE LAWTON MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

OXON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY

Table of Contents. Topic 1: Principals of Criminal Responsibility Evidence that a child knew it was wrong Direct Liability...

Video Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched

LLB#170#!Law$of$Contract$B"

1. Humanities-oriented academic essays are typically both analytical and argumentative.

PENNSYLVANIA CONFLICT OF LAWS PROFESSOR KEVIN P. OATES DREXEL UNIVERSITY THOMAS R. KLINE SCHOOL OF LAW

SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT AND EXTRAORDINARY TREATMENT. Substituted Judgment--Overview

Community Protection Notices and Public Space Protection Orders. County Policing Command. Superintendent David Buckley

TORTS FULL COURSE SUMMARY AND READINGS. Breach of duty

Delict: The act of a person which in a wrongful and culpable way causes loss/damage.

EVIDENCE NOTES

SUMMARY OF NORTH CAROLINA EXPUNCTIONS. Criteria Filing Requirements Add l Information

TEXAS AGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 July 2000 (28.07) (OR. fr) 10242/00 LIMITE ASILE 30

Engage MAT DBS Policy

TORTS. Prof. Kalt Fall I. Intentional Torts Chapter 1 Intentional Torts Chapter 2 (Affirmative) Defense II. Negligence...

PART XII DOCTRINES OF COMPLICITY

COURT FACILITY EQUAL ACCESS POLICY

CONTRACT LAW IN GENERAL: R

LAW SCHOOL ESSENTIALS TORTS PROFESSOR SHERMAN CLARK UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL

(1) Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for five years.

BRIEFING NOTE. Both these cases involved appeals from judgments of Charles J in the Upper Tribunal, where the Court of Appeal considered:

Joan DUBAERE Racine & Vergels

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AMENDMENT BILL [B2B 2017] TABLE OF CONTENTS

Guardianship & Conservatorship In Virginia

The Terrorism Act 2000 came into force on 20 July

DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I $5,461 - $7,410/Month

OHIO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR RIC SIMMONS THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MORITZ COLLEGE OF LAW

Bob Simpson: Director of Intergovernmental Relations, Inuvialuit Regional Corp.

This tort protects the interests of plaintiffs in maintaining their land free from physical intrusion

2. UNCONSCIENTIOUS DEALING

Incorporating Unemployment Compensation Law Into Your Practice

NOTES. Criminal Procedure 1 CMP201-6

Answer: The issue in this question is whether Donny acted in reliance of Ann s offer to get the reward of $1000.

FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION HEARING

APPENDIX II ISSUES CHECKLIST

Week 1 Lecture. Nature of Tort Law

Measuring Public Opinion

CALIFORNIA TORTS ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW

Evidence Law LAWS5013

US ESTA Application Form

LAWS2114: CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE B

FACULTY OF LAW LAWS5013 EVIDENCE

Establishing the standard of care against which the D will be assessed;

Eyewitness Identification. Professor Nancy K. Steblay Augsburg College Minneapolis

Contract Law Notes - Table of Contents

! 1. Scope of Judicial Review - Performed by superior courts - Concerned with legality of decisions - Limited to reviewing executive power

CRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY (I) GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY. Woolmington v DPP

The British Computer Society. Open Source Specialist Group Constitution

February 6, Interview with WILLIAM J. BAROODY,.JR. William A. Syers Political Scientist and Deputy Director House Republican Policy Committee

Nova Scotia Nominee Program NSNP 200 Employer Information

CALIFORNIA REMEDIES ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW

Nova Scotia Nominee Program NSNP Demand 200 Employer Information

WITH RECENT CHANGES ISSUED BY THE CFPB, FINAL REMITTANCE TRANSFER REGULATIONS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 7, 2013

OHIO CRIMINAL LAW DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR RIC SIMMONS THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MORITZ COLLEGE OF LAW

Alex Castles, The Reception and Status of English law in Australia (1963) pg

MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR BRENDAN HURSON UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW

MHA or MCA a more flexible approach?

GUIDELINES FOR GRANT APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION

Transcription:

ASSAULT DIAGRAM ASSAULT SUMMARY S 61 - Cmmn Assault: Whsever assaults any persn, althugh nt ccasining actual bdily harm, shall be liable t imprisnment fr tw years. ACTUS REUS 1. Unlawful physical cntact (applicatin f frce) - Must be a vluntary act (cannt be missin Fagan but nte flexible use f AR and MR cincidence requirement in that case) - Need nt cause harm r injury (can be spitting see DPP v JWH) - Applicatin f frce can nly give rise t criminal liability if it ccurs withut the ther persn s cnsent (express r implied the circumstance) 2. Act creating apprehensin f imminent unlawful physical cntact - D may be guilty f assault even if n cntact is made with/frce is applied t anther persn - Wrds alne in inapprpriate circumstances can cnstitute assault at cmmn law (Bartn v Armstrng) - Where D creates in V an apprehensin f imminent (immediate) unlawful cntact - Requires a psitive act (Fagan) but there is a brad definitin (see Ireland and Burstw) - IMMINENCE: Knight: Threatening & abusive phne call, absent the ptential fr immediate vilence, did nt cnstitute assault Zanker v Vartzkas: Verbal threat, within the cntext f cntinuing unlawful imprisnment, cnstituted a threat f immediate vilence, cnsequently injury sustained escaping = assault ccasining ABH Ireland & Burstw: Silent phne calls may cnstitute an assault depending n the facts MENS REA P must prve either that D: 1. Intentin: Intended t effect unlawful cntact; r create apprehensins f imminent unlawful cntact; r

2. Recklessness: was reckless as t whether his/her actins wuld effect unlawful cntact; r create apprehensins f imminent unlawful cntact. Subjective! wether D knws culd give V reasnable grund f apprehensin RECKLESSNESS! fresight f a pssibility (negligence insufficient MacPhersn v Brwn) CL: Particular frm f recklessness is inadvertent recklessness. But, als see CA s 4. AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS ss 32-61 Presence f ne f mre factrs Harm caused Harm intended (r inflicted recklessly) Methd used (e.g. weapn) Status f victim (e.g. plice fficer) Setting (e.g. schl, during public disrder, etc) HARM Actual Bdily Harm (ABH) - defined in CL as any hurt r injury calculated t interfere with the health r cmfrt f the prsecutr need nt be permanent but mre than merely transient and trifling (Dnvan); can be a psychiatric illness (Ireland & Burstw). N statutry MR lk t case law. Grievus Bdily Harm (GBH) nn- exhaustive definitin: Crimes Act s 4: the destructin (ther than in the curse f a medical prcedure) f the fetus f a pregnant wman...any permanent r serius disfiguring f the persn...any grievus bdily disease...really serius" (see DPP v Smith; death f a fetus see King). Can be caused by an missin (s 54) degree f negligence same fr manslaughter (R v D) Wunding defined in CL as an injury invlving the breaking r cutting f the interir layer f the skin (dermis) (R v Smith) Wunding r causing GBH requires intent t cause GBH. Misdirectin f intended harm des nt negate the intentin fr the purpses f prving the ffence. Occasining = there must be causatin! assault ccasining ABH is cmmn assault which happens t cause ABH! MR fr that ffence is identical t that f cmmn assault (Zanker) ACCEPTABLE VIOLENCE CONSENT Absence f cnsent an ingredient f criminal respnsibility perates like a defence Aggravated assault w/harm caused cnsent NO defence (Brwn) Accepted exceptins: tatting, male circumcisin, bdy piercing, branding spuse (Wilsn), sprts (Billinghurst), medical prcedure (vitiated by mistake as t nature f act/identity f persn (Richardsn) CHILD DISCIPLINE Crimes Act, s 61AA defence f lawful crrectin; parents entitled t use reasnable and mderate frce t chastise their children ASSAULT CASES Unlawful physical cntact: Fagan v Cmmissiner f Metrplitan Plice [1969] 1 QB 439 (Fagan) Issue: Was there the necessary cincidence f criminal intent with the physical element f the assault, sufficient t cnstitute a crime? Held: N mere missin t act can amunt t an assault. But, physical element f assault regarded as a cntinuing act. Criminal intent frmed during the curse f cntinuing act Apprehensin f imminent unlawful physical cntact: MacPhersn v Brwn: An assault is any act, which intentinally r recklessly causes anther persn t apprehend immediate and unlawful vilence f physical cntact. The mens rea is D s intentin t prduce such a fear/ reckless as t whether their cnduct wuld give rise t such a fear and cntinues anyway. Rzsa v Samuels: A threat made in a way that implies that vilence will be inflicted nly in certain circumstances will meet the definitin f assault based n apprehensin f immediate vilence if the accused had n right t make the cnditin e.g. ging beynd what was reasnable as self- defence. Knight v R (1988) 35 A Crim R 314 (Knight) Issue: Where a phne call in which threats f vilence were made culd cnstitute an assault Held: Distinctin between apprehending immediate vilence (AR f CL assault) and immediately apprehending vilence (perceptin f ptential victim, may r may nt be justified in the circumstances). Victim must reasnably anticipate the threat f frce e.g. if caller lived in a neighburing street. R v Ireland; R v Burstw [1997] 4 All ER 225 (Ireland & Burstw) Issue: Can silent phne calls prve a sufficient threat f immediate vilence t cnstitute and assault? Held: Yes, in certain circumstances they can. Cntext and facts f each case required. Zanker v Vartzkas (1988) 34 A Crim R 11 (SASC) Issue: can a verbal threat cnstitute a threat f immediate vilence? Held: Yes, within the cntext f cntinuing unlawful imprisnment cnsequently, an injury sustained escaping immediately after the verbal threat was sufficient t sustain a charge f assault ccasining ABH.

Mens Rea MacPhersn v Brwn: Recklessness must be a fresight f pssibility; subjective test. R v Cleman: under CL, frm f recklessness required is advertent recklessness. D must realise that a wund r GBH might be inflicted as a cnsequence f his/her cnduct. Culter v R: Nt necessary fr prsecutin t establish a specific intent t cause ABH. R v Williams: Sufficient if D intentinally r recklessly assaults V and ABH is ccasined. Cnsent: t harm Brwn [1994] 1 AC 212 Issue: can cnsensual, sad- maschistic activities that cause ABH/Wunding/GBH give rise t assault? Held: Yes, certain acts are unlawful regardless f cnsent. In this case, drink and drugs were emplyed t btain cnsent. There is als a public risk f spreading HIV/AIDS R v Wilsn [1997] QB 47: degree f injury and dangerus risk branding spuse lgically n different than tatt. Cnsent: vilence in sprt Billinghurst: Participant s cnsent; reasnable be expected, cases which crss the line Stanley: Must be within the bjects f the game/in accrdance with the rules What cnstitutes ABH? R v Dnvan: any hurt/injury calculated t interfere with the health r cmfrt f V. Must be mre than transient/trifling. Need nt be permanent. It is an unlawful act t beat anther persn with such a degree f vilence that the inflictin f bdily harm is a prbable cnsequence and when such an act is prved, cnsent is immaterial. Ireland & Burstw: Can include psychiatric injury, but nt mere emtins (fear, distress, panic). State f mind must be a symptm f an identifiable clinical cnditins, e.g. severe depressin/anxiety disrder. Zanker v Vartzkas: Injuries incurred by V while escaping frm D, caused by D if circumstances cmprising an assault exist (apprehensin f immediate physical vilence) Williams v R: Whether ABH has been ccasined is determined bjectively. What is wunding? R v Smith: An injury t the interir layer f the skin (dermis) withut breaking the uter layer (epidermis) was sufficient fr a wunding. Injury must invlve a breaking f the dermis, breaking f the uter layer f the skin is nt sufficient. Grievus Bdily Harm DPP v Smith [1961] AC 290: Bdily harm held t have its rdinary meaning, and grievus was held t mean really serius. I.e. GBH = bdily injury f a really serius kind. R v King [2003] NSWCCA 399: Killing an unbrn fetus (ther than by medical prcedure) culd be regarded as inflicting GBH n the mther. Assault n law enfrcement fficials Reynhudt (1962) 107 CLR 381: The accused need nt knw the victim was a plice fficer ASSAULT STATUTE Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Assault Categry NSW Pints t prve Basic (nn- injurius) assault ffence Cmmn law, charged under the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61 Sme injury/harm Crimes Act s 59 - An assault must be cmmitted by D n V - That ccasins ABH Serius injury/harm Crimes Act s 33 Crimes Act s 35 Crimes Act s 54 4 Definitins Grievus bdily harm includes: (a) the destructin (ther than in the curse f a medical prcedure) f the fetus f a pregnant wman, whether r nt the wman suffers any ther harm, and (b) any permanent r serius disfiguring f the persn, and (c) any grievus bdily disease (in which case a reference t the inflictin f grievus bdily harm includes a reference t

causing a persn t cntract a grievus bdily disease). Offensive weapn r instrument means: (a) a dangerus weapn, r (b) any thing that is made r adapted fr ffensive purpses, r (c) any thing that, in the circumstances, is used, intended fr use r threatened t be used fr ffensive purpses, whether r nt it is rdinarily used fr ffensive purpses r is capable f causing harm. 4A Recklessness Fr the purpses f this Act, if an element f an ffence is recklessness, that element may als be established by prf f intentin r knwledge. 33 Wunding r grievus bdily harm with intent (1) Intent t cause grievus bdily harm A persn wh: (a) wunds any persn, r (b) causes grievus bdily harm t any persn, with intent t cause grievus bdily harm t that r any ther persn is guilty f an ffence. Maximum penalty: Imprisnment fr 25 years. (2) Intent t resist arrest A persn wh: (a) wunds any persn, r (b) causes grievus bdily harm t any persn, with intent t resist r prevent his r her (r anther persn s) lawful arrest r detentin is guilty f an ffence. Maximum penalty: Imprisnment fr 25 years. 35 Reckless grievus bdily harm r wunding (2) Reckless grievus bdily harm A persn wh: (a) causes grievus bdily harm t any persn, and (b) is reckless as t causing actual bdily harm t that r any ther persn, is guilty f an ffence. Maximum penalty: Imprisnment fr 10 years (14 years if in cmpany) (4) Reckless wunding A persn wh: (a) wunds any persn, and (b) is reckless as t causing actual bdily harm t that r any ther persn, is guilty f an ffence. Maximum penalty: Imprisnment fr 7 years (10 years if in cmpany) 54 Causing grievus bdily harm Whsever by any unlawful r negligent act, r missin, causes grievus bdily harm t any persn, shall be liable t imprisnment fr tw years. 59 Assault ccasining actual bdily harm (1) Whsever assaults any persn, and thereby ccasins actual bdily harm, shall be liable t imprisnment fr five years. (2) A persn is guilty f an ffence under this subsectin if the persn cmmits an ffence under subsectin (1) in the cmpany f anther persn r persns. A persn cnvicted f an ffence under this subsectin is liable t imprisnment fr 7 years. 61 Cmmn assault prsecuted by indictment

Whsever assaults any persn, althugh nt ccasining actual bdily harm, shall be liable t imprisnment fr tw years. 61AA Defence f lawful crrectin (1) In criminal prceedings brught against a persn arising ut f the applicatin f physical frce t a child, it is a defence that the frce was applied fr the purpse f the punishment f the child, but nly if: (a) the physical frce was applied by the parent f the child r by a persn acting fr a parent f the child, and (b) the applicatin f that physical frce was reasnable having regard t the age, health, maturity r ther characteristics f the child, the nature f the alleged misbehaviur r ther circumstances. (2) The applicatin f physical frce, unless that frce culd reasnably be cnsidered trivial r negligible in all the circumstances, is nt reasnable if the frce is applied: (a) t any part f the head r neck f the child, r (b) t any ther part f the bdy f the child in such a way as t be likely t cause harm t the child that lasts fr mre than a shrt perid. (3) Subsectin (2) des nt limit the circumstances in which the applicatin f physical frce is nt reasnable. (4) This sectin des nt dergate frm r affect any defence at cmmn law (ther than t mdify the defence f lawful crrectin). (5) Nthing in this sectin alters the cmmn law cncerning the management, cntrl r restraint f a child by means f physical cntact r frce fr purpses ther than punishment. (6) In this sectin: child means a persn under 18 years f age. parent f a child means a persn having all the duties, pwers, respnsibilities and authrity in respect f the child which, by law, parents have in relatin t their children. persn acting fr a parent f a child means a persn: (a) wh: (i) is a step- parent f the child, a de fact partner f a parent f the child, a relative (by bld r marriage) f a parent f the child r a persn t whm the parent has entrusted the care and management f the child, and (ii) is authrised by a parent f the child t use physical frce t punish the child, r (b) wh, in the case f a child wh is an Abriginal r Trres Strait Islander (within the meaning f the Children and Yung Persns (Care and Prtectin) Act 1998), is recgnised by the Abriginal r Trres Strait Islander cmmunity t which the child belngs as being an apprpriate persn t exercise special respnsibilities in relatin t the child. BACKGROUND OF ASSAULT Scial cntext: e.g. sprt, parents, schl basic assault ffence (s 61) max penalty f imprisnment 2 yrs 5 yrs basic larceny ffence (s 117) and malicius damage t prperty (s 195) rise in reprting f dmestic assault Legal categries: assault (assault and battery) still a distinctin between the tw! assault: putting anther persn in fear r apprehensin f an unlawful cntact battery: actual applicatin f frce withut cnsent Statistics cmmn assault - secnd mst cmmn ffence prsecuted in Lcal Curts in 2007 imprisnment a less frequent utcme Patterns f victimisatin Rethinking Law & Order R Hgg & D Brwn vilence amng men! interpersnal vilence; excessive use f alchl vilence amng family members! inequalities f pwer and strength; bund up in intimate relatinships; unemplyed/receiving welfare marginalisatin and vilence in Abriginal cmmunities! due t under- emplyment, vercrwded husing, bad health standards, high levels f alchlism, limited educatinal pprtunities fr the yung! lead t sense f hpelessness and alienatin,! als due t legacy f gvernment plicies f dispssessin, frcible resettlement, segregatin and the breaking up f families and cmmunities e.g. by systematic remval f children