FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

Similar documents
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012)

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

GUAM CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 6 EVIDENCE UPDATED THROUGH P.L (JUNE 12, 2015)

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

FEDERAL RULES EVIDENCE

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. The New Hampshire Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules will

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows:

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

How to Testify. Qualifications for Testimony. Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS FRE

Thinking Evidentially

J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE effective March 1, 2013

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE

The scope of the Alabama Rules of Evidence is stated in Rule 101: So it makes some sense to go straight to Rule 1101, even though it is

DISTRICT COURT EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 885 E. Chambers Road P.O. Box 597 Eagle, Colorado Plaintiff: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO.

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1

COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS

Non-Scientific Expert Testimony in Child Abuse Trials

Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee

Discussion. Discussion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION * * * * * * * * *

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline

The IllInoIs Rules of evidence

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence

Eyewitness identification is evidence received from a witness who has actually seen an event and can so testify in court.

Case 3:07-cr EDL Document 49 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 8

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence

Federal Rules of Evidence

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES

1980, No. 27 Evidence Amendment (No. 2) 173

California Bar Examination

PlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v.

Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney

Court Filings 2000 Trial

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

ARTICLE IX DISCIPLINE

Evidence Prof. Jane Aiken Spring 2004

EVIDENCE. Professor Franks. Final Examination, Fall 2013 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense

A JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE. (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee. Senior Resident Superior Court Judge.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

6.17. Impeachment by Instances of Misconduct

9i;RK, U.S~CE'F,T COURT

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.

KXL: Surprise! Economists Do Not Agree

Criminal Evidence 6th Edition

E. Expert Testimony Issue. 1. Defendants may assert that before any photographs or video evidence from a camera

Rules of the National High School Mock Trial Competition Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2010

Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No MDA 2013

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL

DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy

Transcription:

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018 Effective July 1, 1975, as amended to Dec. 1, 2017 The goal of this 2018 edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence 1 is to provide the practitioner with a convenient copy to bring to court or the office. Other titles such as Louisiana Civil Code, Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are available at www.gulfcoastlegalpublishing.com. For bulk and academic discount inquiries, email info@gulfcoastlegalpublishing.com. ISBN-13: 978-1979389198 ISBN-10: 1979389195 Gulf Coast Legal Publishing, LLC New Orleans, Louisiana 1 No part of this edition of the Federal Rules of Evidence may be sold, commercially distributed, or used for any other commercial purpose without the written permission of Gulf Coast Legal Publishing.

Table of Contents ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 5 Rule 101. Scope; Definitions... 5 Rule 102. Purpose... 5 Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence... 5 Rule 104. Preliminary Questions... 6 Rule 105. Limiting Evidence That Is Not Admissible Against Other Parties or for Other Purposes... 6 Rule 106. Remainder of or Related Writings or Recorded Statements... 6 ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE... 7 Rule 201. Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts... 7 ARTICLE III. PRESUMPTIONS IN CIVIL CASES... 8 Rule 301. Presumptions in Civil Cases Generally... 8 Rule 302. Applying State Law to Presumptions in Civil Cases... 8 ARTICLE IV. RELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS... 9 Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence... 9 Rule 402. General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence... 9 Rule 403. Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons... 9 Rule 404. Character Evidence; Crimes or Other Acts... 9 Rule 405. Methods of Proving Character... 10 Rule 406. Habit; Routine Practice... 10 Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures... 10 Rule 408. Compromise Offers and Negotiations... 11 Rule 409. Offers to Pay Medical and Similar Expenses... 11 Rule 410. Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements... 11 Rule 411. Liability Insurance... 11 Rule 412. Sex-Offense Cases: The Victim s Sexual Behavior or Predisposition... 11 Rule 413. Similar Crimes in Sexual-Assault Cases... 12 Rule 414. Similar Crimes in Child Molestation Cases... 13 Rule 415. Similar Acts in Civil Cases Involving Sexual Assault or Child Molestation... 13 ARTICLE V. PRIVILEGES... 14 Rule 501. Privilege in General... 14 Rule 502. Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product; Limitations on Waiver... 14 ARTICLE VI. WITNESSES... 16 Rule 601. Competency to Testify in General... 16 Rule 602. Need for Personal Knowledge... 16 Rule 603. Oath or Affirmation to Testify Truthfully... 16 Rule 604. Interpreter... 16 Rule 605. Judge s Competency as a Witness... 16 2

Rule 606. Juror s Competency as a Witness... 16 Rule 607. Who May Impeach a Witness... 17 Rule 608. A Witness s Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness... 17 Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction... 17 Rule 610. Religious Beliefs or Opinions... 18 Rule 611. Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence... 18 Rule 612. Writing Used to Refresh a Witness s Memory... 18 Rule 613. Witness s Prior Statement... 19 Rule 614. Court s Calling or Examining a Witness... 19 Rule 615. Excluding Witnesses... 19 ARTICLE VII. OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY... 20 Rule 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses... 20 Rule 702. Testimony by Expert Witnesses... 20 Rule 703. Bases of an Expert s Opinion Testimony... 20 Rule 704. Opinion on an Ultimate Issue... 20 Rule 705. Disclosing the Facts or Data Underlying an Expert... 21 Rule 706. Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses... 21 ARTICLE VIII. HEARSAY... 22 Rule 801. Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay... 22 Rule 802. The Rule Against Hearsay... 22 Rule 803. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness... 23 Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable... 25 Rule 805. Hearsay Within Hearsay... 26 Rule 806. Attacking and Supporting the Declarant s Credibility... 26 Rule 807. Residual Exception... 27 ARTICLE IX. AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION... 28 Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence... 28 Rule 902. Evidence That Is Self-Authenticating... 28 Rule 903. Subscribing Witness s Testimony... 30 ARTICLE X. CONTENTS OF WRITINGS, RECORDINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS... 31 Rule 1001. Definitions That Apply to This Article... 31 Rule 1002. Requirement of the Original... 31 Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates... 31 Rule 1004. Admissibility of Other Evidence of Content... 31 Rule 1005. Copies of Public Records to Prove Content... 32 Rule 1006. Summaries to Prove Content... 32 Rule 1007. Testimony or Statement of a Party to Prove Content... 32 Rule 1008. Functions of the Court and Jury... 32 3

ARTICLE XI. MISCELLANEOUS RULES... 33 Rule 1101. Applicability of the Rules... 33 Rule 1102. Amendments... 33 Rule 1103. Title... 33 4

ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope; Definitions (a) Scope. These rules apply to proceedings in United States courts. The specific courts and proceedings to which the rules apply, along with exceptions, are set out in Rule 1101. (b) Definitions. In these rules: (1) civil case means a civil action or proceeding; (2) criminal case includes a criminal proceeding; (3) public office includes a public agency; (4) record includes a memorandum, report, or data compilation; (5) a rule prescribed by the Supreme Court means a rule adopted by the Supreme Court under statutory authority; and (6) a reference to any kind of written material or any other medium includes electronically stored information. Rule 102. Purpose These rules should be construed so as to administer every proceeding fairly, eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and promote the development of evidence law, to the end of ascertaining the truth and securing a just determination. Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and: (1) if the ruling admits evidence, a party, on the record: (A) timely objects or moves to strike; and (B) states the specific ground, unless it was apparent from the context; or (2) if the ruling excludes evidence, a party informs the court of its substance by an offer of proof, unless the substance was apparent from the context. (b) Not Needing to Renew an Objection or Offer of Proof. Once the court rules definitively on the record either before or at trial a party need not renew an objection or offer of proof to preserve a claim of error for appeal. (c) Court s Statement About the Ruling; Directing an Offer of Proof. The court may make any statement about the character or form of the evidence, the objection made, and the ruling. The court may direct that an offer of proof be made in question-and-answer form. (d) Preventing the Jury from Hearing Inadmissible Evidence. To the extent practicable, the court must conduct a jury trial so that inadmissible evidence is not suggested to the jury by any means. (e) Taking Notice of Plain Error. A court may take notice of a plain error affecting a substantial right, even if the claim of error was not properly preserved. 5

Rule 104. Preliminary Questions (a) In General. The court must decide any preliminary question about whether a witness is qualified, a privilege exists, or evidence is admissible. In so deciding, the court is not bound by evidence rules, except those on privilege. (b) Relevance That Depends on a Fact. When the relevance of evidence depends on whether a fact exists, proof must be introduced sufficient to support a finding that the fact does exist. The court may admit the proposed evidence on the condition that the proof be introduced later. (c) Conducting a Hearing So That the Jury Cannot Hear It. The court must conduct any hearing on a preliminary question so that the jury cannot hear it if: (1) the hearing involves the admissibility of a confession; (2) a defendant in a criminal case is a witness and so requests; or (3) justice so requires. (d) Cross-Examining a Defendant in a Criminal Case. By testifying on a preliminary question, a defendant in a criminal case does not become subject to cross-examination on other issues in the case. (e) Evidence Relevant to Weight and Credibility. This rule does not limit a party s right to introduce before the jury evidence that is relevant to the weight or credibility of other evidence. Rule 105. Limiting Evidence That Is Not Admissible Against Other Parties or for Other Purposes If the court admits evidence that is admissible against a party or for a purpose but not against another party or for another purpose the court, on timely request, must restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly. Rule 106. Remainder of or Related Writings or Recorded Statements If a party introduces all or part of a writing or recorded statement, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part or any other writing or recorded statement that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time. 6

ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE Rule 201. Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts (a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact. (b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it: (1) is generally known within the trial court s territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. (c) Taking Notice. The court: (1) may take judicial notice on its own; or (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information. (d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding. (e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard. (f) Instructing the Jury. In a civil case, the court must instruct the jury to accept the noticed fact as conclusive. In a criminal case, the court must instruct the jury that it may or may not accept the noticed fact as conclusive. 7

ARTICLE III. PRESUMPTIONS IN CIVIL CASES Rule 301. Presumptions in Civil Cases Generally In a civil case, unless a federal statute or these rules provide otherwise, the party against whom a presumption is directed has the burden of producing evidence to rebut the presumption. But this rule does not shift the burden of persuasion, which remains on the party who had it originally. Rule 302. Applying State Law to Presumptions in Civil Cases In a civil case, state law governs the effect of a presumption regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision. 8

ARTICLE IV. RELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action. Rule 402. General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence Relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise: the United States Constitution; a federal statute; these rules; or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. Irrelevant evidence is not admissible. Rule 403. Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. Rule 404. Character Evidence; Crimes or Other Acts (a) Character Evidence. (1) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of a person s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait. (2) Exceptions for a Defendant or Victim in a Criminal Case. The following exceptions apply in a criminal case: (A) a defendant may offer evidence of the defendant s pertinent trait, and if the evidence is admitted, the prosecutor may offer evidence to rebut it; (B) subject to the limitations in Rule 412, a defendant may offer evidence of an alleged victim s pertinent trait, and if the evidence is admitted, the prosecutor may: (i) offer evidence to rebut it; and (ii) offer evidence of the defendant s same trait; and (C) in a homicide case, the prosecutor may offer evidence of the alleged victim s trait of peacefulness to rebut evidence that the victim was the first aggressor. (3) Exceptions for a Witness. Evidence of a witness s character may be admitted under Rules 607, 608, and 609. 9